Skip to content

Month: June 2008

Oh No

by digby

I knew John McCain would make some sort of overt play for Hillary voters, particularly older women, but I never dreamed he’d go this route:

Senator John McCain’s campaign is taking a more lighthearted approach to chatting up these women, at least in a new blog it debuted last night, The McCain Report.

The latest entry says, “Attention disaffected Hillary supporters, John McCain is a huge ABBA fan. Seriously.” Embedded is a YouTube video with the famous refrain:

If you change your mind,
I’m the first in line
Honey I’m still free
Take a chance on me

Let’s hope he doesn’t continue in this vein or we are likely to see him sing “Do You Think I’m Sexy” at some karaoke night in Ohio and start dishing with the gals about which cast member of “Sex In The City” he most identifies with.

For the love of all that is good and decent about America, please, I beg him, don’t go there.

.

Saturday Night At The Movies

SIFF-ting Through Celluloid: The Wrecking Crew & Sita Sings the Blues

By Dennis Hartley

The 2008 Seattle International Film Festival is in full swing, so I thought that for the next few posts I would take you along to some of this year’s screenings.

Navigating a film festival is no easy task, even for a dedicated buff. This year’s SIFF is screening nearly 400 features and documentaries, over a period just shy of four weeks. It must be a wonderful opportunity for independently wealthy slackers, but for those of us who have to work for a living, it’s a little tough catching the North American premiere of that hot new documentary from Uzbekistan that is only screening once at 11:45am on a Tuesday. I’m lucky if I can catch a dozen films each year, but I do take consolation from my observation that the ratio of less-than-stellar (too many) to quality films (too few) at a film festival differs little from any Friday night crapshoot at the multiplex. The trick lies in developing a sixth sense for which titles “feel” like they would be up your alley (or, in my case, embracing your OCD and channeling it like a cinematic divining rod.)

Some of the films I will be reviewing will hopefully be “coming to a theatre near you” in the near future; on the other hand there may be a few that will only be accessible via DVD (the Netflix queue is our friend!). BTW, if you are lucky enough to go to Sundance, Toronto or Cannes, let’s get this out of the way now-Yes, I am quite aware that Seattle gets sloppy seconds from some of the more prestigious festivals; so go ahead, we’ll wait while you do your little “superior dance”. Okay, feel better? Good! Now let’s move on.

The Wrecking Crew: Girls just wanna read charts.

First up-a breezy and highly entertaining music biz documentary called The Wrecking Crew (not to be confused with the 1969 “Matt Helm” caper). “The Wrecking Crew” was a moniker given to a relatively small group of crack L.A. session players who in essence created the “sound” of classic American pop music that dominated the Top 40 radio charts from the late 50s through the mid 70s. With several notable exceptions (Glen Campbell, Leon Russell and Mac “Dr. John” Rebennack) their names remain obscure to the casual listener, even though the music they helped create is forever burned into our collective neurons.

The film was a labor of love in every sense of the word for first-time director Denny Tedesco, whose late father was the guitarist extraordinaire Tommy Tedesco, a premier member of the crew. Tedesco traces the origins of the aggregation, from its participation in helping to create the legendary “Wall of Sound” of the early 60s (lorded over by mercurial pop savant Phil Spector) to collaborations with Brian Wilson (most notably, on the Beach Boys’ seminal “Pet Sounds” album) and backing sessions with just about any other popular artist of the era you would care to mention (Sam Cooke, Ray Charles, The Righteous Brothers, Henry Mancini, Ike & Tina Turner, The Monkees, The Association, Nancy Sinatra, The Fifth Dimension, The Byrds, Sonny & Cher, The Mamas and the Papas, Frank Zappa, etc.). Not to mention a myriad of TV show themes.

Tedesco features some incredibly cool vintage studio footage, as well as archival and present day interviews with key players. You also hear from some of the producers who utilized their talents (Herb Alpert, Brian Wilson and Jack Nitzsche). Tedesco assembled a group of surviving members to swap anecdotes (and as you can imagine, these guys have got some great stories to tell). One of my favorite reminiscences concerned the first recording sessions for The Monkees. An apparently uninformed Peter Tork showed up in the studio, guitar in hand-and was greeted by a roomful of bemused session players, giving him a “WTF are YOU doing here?!” look before he slunk away in embarrassment.

One of the revelations in the film is bass player/guitarist Carol Kaye, a quietly unassuming pioneer who commanded a lot of respect in a traditionally male-dominated niche of the music industry. In a great scene, she modestly demonstrates a few signature bass lines that you may have heard, oh, once or twice; the opening riffs for “The Beat Goes On”, “California Girls”, the “Mission Impossible Theme”, even that subtle 5 note run that opens Glen Campbell’s “Witchita Lineman” proves to be distinctively all hers.

Judging from audience reaction, however, the star of the film is drummer Hal Blaine, who may very well be the most recorded drummer in the history of pop music. Blaine was at the screening I attended, and did a Q & A along with the director after the film. He told the audience that he is currently in the midst of compiling his discography (with the help of several researchers); he said so far they have been able to annotate “only” about 5,000 sessions (some estimates top the 10,000 mark). Blaine tells colorful and hilarious stories; he reminds me a lot of musician/comedian Pete Barbuti, who never failed to put me on the floor in his numerous appearances on The Tonight Show throughout the 70s.

Tedesco’s film makes a perfect companion to the 2003 doc Standing In The Shadows of Motown. That film profiled another group of unheralded session players (aka the “Funk Brothers”) who backed nearly every Motown hit. I know that there are some who look down their nose at this “lunch pail” approach to creating music, but there is no denying the chops that these players bring to the table, and I say more power to ‘em, myself. Tedesco’s film is a joyous celebration of a body of popular art that (love it or loathe it), literally provided the “soundtrack of our lives” for those of a (ahem) certain age.

Sita Sings the Blues: Cry me a river

Another film that looks to be an early audience favorite at SIFF this year is a wholly original animated musical called Sita Sings the Blues. This is the first full-length animated feature from cartoonist turned filmmaker Nina Paley, whose alt-comic strip “Nina’s Adventures” has appeared in the San Francisco Examiner and the L.A. Reader. She is now being called a “one-woman Pixar”, for producing this film on her home P.C.

Paley cheekily adapts the Ramayana, an ancient and highly revered Sanskrit epic about the doomed love between Prince Rama (an incarnation of the god Vishnu) and the ever-devoted Sita. She juxtaposes it with a neurotic examination of her own failed marriage; the result is perhaps best described as Annie Hall meets Yellow Submarine in Bollywood.

Borrowing a device from the 1981 film Pennies From Heaven, Paley literally “jazzes up” the tale with musical interludes featuring the long suffering Sita lip synching to scratchy recordings by 1920s vocal stylist Annette Henshaw. Modern context is also provided by a parallel narrative concerning a present day yuppie couple living in NYC. The contemporary scenes are demarcated by a stylistic departure from the colorful computer generated animation that informs Sita’s story; Paley switches to a mix of stop-motion line drawings and rotoscoping. She also uses three narrators, who frequently (and hilariously) break through the fourth wall to debate with each other about the subtexts of the tale.

Paley’s film is actually not the first animated adaptation of this story; Ramayana – The Legend of Prince Rama (a Japanese anime from 1992) and Ramayana – Epic of Ram (an Indian production aimed at kids) have preceded it. Keeping in mind that the original Ramayana is a 24,000 couplet epic poem, and that this is an 80 minute film with a Cliff’s Notes vibe, it obviously may not sit well with scholarly purists. But for those who harbor no objection to an imaginative and fun deconstruction of such a culturally venerable tale, Sita Sings the Blues makes for a lively, tuneful, funny and eye-popping cinematic treat.

.

What’s The Rush?

by digby

Nick Beaudrot asks:

Who’s going to be the First Woman President? I know Obama-Sebelius is trendy, but I’m putting my money on Stephanie Herseth Sandlin at the top of the ticket in 2024.

.

Criminal

by digby

A reader sent me this link to the Cunningrealist from May 5 and I was surprised by what it contained. Were you aware that John McCain wrote the foreward to an edition of The Best And the Brightest? And were you aware that it said this?

It was a shameful thing to ask men to suffer and die, to persevere through god-awful afflictions and heartache, to endure the dehumanizing experiences that are unavoidable in combat, for a cause that the country wouldn’t support over time and that our leaders so wrongly believed could be achieved at a smaller cost than our enemy was prepared to make us pay. No other national endeavor requires as much unshakable resolve as war. If the nation and the government lack that resolve, it is criminal to expect men in the field to carry it alone.

Will anyone ask him about this?

.

Eye Opener

by digby

Clinton has officially suspended her campaign and thrown her support to Obama. I’m sure we’ll hear a lot of very nice encomiums over the next few days. The media never loves a Democrat more than immediately after he (or she) concedes.

C&L has the video of Clinton’s speech. I thought it was very, very strong — inspiring, conciliatory, intelligent and respectful of her supporters and her rival. John King and Chris Matthews insist she was “auditioning” for VP. (The implication being, naturally, that she doesn’t mean a word of it unless she gets what she wants.) Carl Bernstein said that she made a good start but needs to do much, much more before anyone will believe her. Clearly, the media is going to have a hard time giving up their obsessions.

These people are asserting, without apparent irony, that if she had asserted her feminist credentials more forcefully and run “as a woman” she could have won. I don’t have the energy to write much more about this right now, but I will eventually. It’s been a long campaign and I tried my best to deal with the subject in real time as it became clear to me that there was something truly ugly going on with the media, even by their low standards. It wasn’t the most popular thing I’ve ever done. (I’ll never forget the reaction, that’s for sure.)

Watch this and keep your lunch down if you can:

And that was far from comprehensive. Media Matters has many more examples.

I have written before that I don’t believe Obama’s win is attributed to this phenomenon. He won it fair and square, carrying a heavy historical burden of his own. But that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Acknowledging that doesn’t create a “toxic legacy” and neither is it just the sad lament of “lonely people” (translation: lonely old women.) But I’m sure those memes will catch on and we’ll all be told that we imagined it all. (Youtube is our new best friend.)

Clinton’s campaign ripped open a hole in our culture and forced us to look inside. And what we found was a simmering cauldron of crude, sophomoric sexism and ugly misogyny that a lot of us knew existed but didn’t realize was still so socially acceptable that it could be broadcast on national television and garner nary a complaint from anybody but a few internet scolds like me. It was eye-opening, to say the least.


.

Peace With Honor

by dday

It took me a little while to figure out what this new John McCain ad reminded me of.

“Only a fool or a fraud talks tough or romantically about war,” McCain tells the camera. “I was shot down over Vietnam and spent five years as a POW. Some of the friends I served with never came home. I hate war. And I know how terrible its costs are.”

Never mind that McCain routinely romanticizes war, such as in his books like Faith of My Fathers or Worth The Fighting For (yes, for some reason there’s a “the” in there). But let’s try and determine what’s really going on here. In the midst of a war he’s cheerleaded for five years, he comes out and tells us how much he hates war, leaving unsaid any desiresor strategies to end the current one.

It reminded me an awful lot of this Richard Nixon ad from 1968:

Nixon talked in slightly more explicit terms about new leadership and an honorable end to Vietnam. But there was no substance behind the talk. While the visual styles are different, each suited to its time period, these are basically the same ads. Rick Perlstein writes about the Nixon ads in his book Nixonland on page 333:

Nixon’s commercials would run without narration as well. The sound would only be music and snippets from stump speeches. The images, rapid-fire collages of still photographs, told the story just as effectively with the sound off, a visual semaphore. TV specialist Harry Treleaven was so proud of their aesthetic force that he screened them for curators at the Museum of Modern Art, hoping they might be added to the collection. The aesthetes were unimpressed: “The good guys are either soldiers, children, or over fifty years old.” It was a telling moment: that’s why Treleaven believed they belonged in the museum. He responded, “Nixon has not only developed the use of the platitude, he’s raised it to an art form” – a mirror of Americans’ “delightful misconceptions of themselves and their country.” (He meant it as a compliment.) (Gene, the combat photographer who created the spots) Jones’s assistant imagined staging the State of the Union the same way – intercut with heart-tugging stills.

While McCain’s spots have that personal touch of narration, they really are meant to evoke the same “delightful misconceptions” – meant to make the viewer feel good instead of informed about any agenda or plan for the future. If you felt good about Nixon pursuing an honorable end to the war in Vietnam, you were comfortable with his escalation into Cambodia and carper-bombing of the North. If you feel satisfied with McCain’s explanation about his hatred of war, you won’t mind so much when he declares it approximately once every 28.4 seconds upon reaching the Oval Office.

This is a blurring strategy, making war into an abstraction that is excruciating but necessary, and avoiding the unnecessary invasion that has saddled us with the occupation of Iraq. The idea that nobody likes war but sometimes there is no choice is a powerful mainstream opinion in America. It has absolutely nothing to do with the current war in Iraq or proposed wars with Iran or Syria or whatever other tiny adversary we have, which is why McCain feels on more solid ground going with the abstraction.

Watch out for this. It’s bound to be effective.

.

Bold Assertion

by digby

Douglas Holtz-Eakin said the only similarity between McCain’s economic plan and Bush’s is a commitment to keep taxes low. “Sadly, it seems that is all President Bush understood in the economy,” Holtz-Eakin said in an interview to be broadcast this weekend on Bloomberg Television’s “Conversations with Judy Woodruff.” It is Barack Obama‘s budget plan, not Senator McCain’s, that resembles Bush’s policies, he said. “It’s dedicated to the recent Bush tradition of spending money on everything,” Holtz-Eakin said.

I have said for ages that the conservatives would purge the Bush men and proclaim that conservatism could never fail it could only be failed. But I never dreamed they’d try to turn George W. Bush into a Democrat. That’s bold. Ridiculous, but bold.

.

Taking It Personally

by tristero

Only weeks after 9/11 Steve Dunleavy called me a traitor.

In 2005, George Packer said I had a second-rate mind.

Now, the head of one of Pastor Hagee’s scams calls me a moral myopic.

But it wasn’t I who supported a president who failed to protect us on 9/11, lied us into a catastrophic war, and partied while his fellow citizens drowned in their own shit. It wasn’t I who failed to perceive the patently obvious evil that was the Bush/Iraq war before it began. Nor am I someone who so hates himself and his ethnic identity so profoundly he is actually paid to defend some anti-Semitic psychopath who thinks Hitler did God’s work and that those who died in the gas chambers sinned against God because they couldn’t flee Germany for an Israel that didn’t exist.

So…if refusing to support a president who shreds the Constitution makes me a traitor, Mr. Dunleavy, then I wear that label as a badge of honor. If knowing I was right about the Bush/Iraq war before the first pointless death makes me a second-rate mind, Mr. Packer, then God save us from further ideas of your first-rate mentality. And finally, Mr. Brog, if seeing a Jew hater for exactly what he is means I”m myopic, then it is not I who needs a new pair of moral eyeglasses.

One word of advice to all three of you. If you spent as much time carefully thinking about the world’s problems as you waste dissing me and other liberals, perhaps you wouldn’t be so utterly, totally, irrevocably, and completely, wrong about everything.

But then again, perhaps not.

h/t Digby

Pilgrimages

by digby

So, earlier this week, Obama and Clinton both appeared before AIPAC and asked for their support. I really don’t have the energy for a pie fight, so I’ll just say that we are talking about politics here and people have to appeal across a wide range of constituencies and leave it at that.

But there is something so wrong with this:

Hagee wasn’t at AIPAC in person, but he got a big hand nonetheless; The Forward reports:

Speakers at the session, titled “Friends in Faith: Evangelical Christians and the Pro-Israel Movement,” included Gary Bauer, president of American Values; John Buhler, founder of Christian Advocates for Israel, and David Brog, executive director of Christians United for Israel, the group led by Hagee. “I want to take a moment to discuss with you a good man, evangelical pastor John Hagee,” Brog said to the audience. Before Brog could finish the sentence, the crowd broke into a lengthy round of applause, ending in a standing ovation. Among the few attendees who did not cheer at the mention of Hagee’s name was the Anti-Defamation League’s national director, Abraham Foxman, who has occasionally been critical of the ties between the Jewish community and Christian Zionists.

Brog, who runs CUFI on behalf of Hagee, has been busy defending the pastor over the past week or so, putting forward the argument that Hagee’s detractors are guilty of religious prejudice.

I have grave reservations about religion playing such a central role in politics because of stuff like this. It makes it nearly impossible to decide how to deal with issues using the methods agreed upon in our constitution — reasoned debate and compromise. There’s no compromise on Armageddon.

A huge amount of this is driven by much more prosaic, material reasons than God’s chosen people or The Rapture, but we can’t discuss those things without running into people’s faith. This is true across a wide range of issues and it’s one reason why the Big Money Boyz are so willing to make common cause with the social conservatives. It provides the best cover an immoral capitalist could possibly hope for.

.

CIC Doesn’t Mean What He Thinks It Means

by digby

FDL points out that McCain is dissing Bush big time when he says that nobody should romanticize war. After all, the guy who trash talked his way through 2002 through 2004 is the poster boy for childish, armchair warrior bravado. Recently he told the troops in the trenches he wishes he could be there with them, fighting for God and glory:

“I must say, I’m a little envious,” Bush said. “If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed.”

“It must be exciting for you … in some ways romantic, in some ways, you know, confronting danger. You’re really making history, and thanks,” Bush said.

But as someone who has chronicled Bush’s GI Joe Action figure routine for years,even I think this one is a doozy:

During a videoconference with his national security team and generals, Sanchez writes, Bush launched into what he described as a “confused” pep talk:

“Kick ass!” he quotes the president as saying. “If somebody tries to stop the march to democracy, we will seek them out and kill them! We must be tougher than hell! This Vietnam stuff, this is not even close. It is a mind-set. We can’t send that message. It’s an excuse to prepare us for withdrawal.” “There is a series of moments and this is one of them. Our will is being tested, but we are resolute. We have a better way. Stay strong! Stay the course! Kill them! Be confident! Prevail! We are going to wipe them out! We are not blinking!”

When you think about it, it actually does make sense on some level, even if what he’s saying is completely incoherent. George W. Bush may have been unqualified, unintelligent and incompetent world leader, but there is one thing at which he’s always excelled, and for quite some time during his administration, it’s the only thing the media in America cared about:

.