Skip to content

Month: September 2008

Of Course They Cheated And Broke The Truce. Duh.

by tristero

Salon:

The two presidential campaigns had declared a truce for the anniversary of 9/11. Traditional campaigning, especially of the negative sort, was supposed to be put on hold. But John McCain’s campaign, it’s now clear, broke that truce — and did so with an ad that nonpartisan watchdog FactCheck.org calls “particularly egregious” for its distortions.

And what did you expect? We’re talking about a race to become leader of the world. Of course, They – the big Them that are Republicans – are gonna pull every trick in the book. And I mean every single trick in the book. And don’t say you weren’t well warned that floating above the fray wouldn’t work.

Unless he starts fighting back now, and hard, Obama won’t merely be defeated. He will be utterly destroyed, his national reputation thoroughly besmirched, his influence in the party nil.

Cue numerous exasperated comments to the effect I couldn’t possibly know what I’m talking about, that Obama has so much support, there’s not a chance in hell he won’t have major Democratic party influence in the future. My response:

From the bottom of my heart, I certainly hope you’re right.

Free tip to Obama’s campaign: Ads and interviews debunking the lies and distortions won’t cut it anymore. They’re just going to get drowned out in the carnage spewing out of McCain/Bush. You are going to have to make some real news with your candidate. What should you do? That’s your job, folks.

Oh, and you’ve missed your chance to give McCain a taste of his own medicine. The moment you start running seriously negative ads, like you should have from Day One, McCain will simply take the high road now. And you’re sunk.

Make some real news, Obama-people. Like you should have the day after the Republican hate-fest in St. Paul.

Note: Am I saying Obama will, inevitably, lose? NO. But due to the Democratic party’s unbelievably awful “support” for Obama – did you hear that Biden said Clinton would make a better veep candidate than he ? – and the campaign’s own failure to press the advantage when they had it for the five minutes beginning the moment Obama’s acceptance speech ended to the unveiling of She-Who-You-Dare-Not-Criticize-You-Fucking-Sexist, it will now be much harder.

And it should have been a complete rout.

UPDATE: Link to Biden’s comment added.

UPDATE: And, as awful as it is to think of pr at a time like this, where is the Obama campaign now that a truly awful hurricane is about to strike? He could easily make the point that he takes real threats seriously, as opposed to McCain’s fakery.

Roadblocks In Cheese Country

by digby

The race in Wisconsin is tightening. Therefore:

A state election official said today a lawsuit by Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen would affect more than 1 million voters, four times as many voters as the Department of Justice had estimated.

Also today, critics accused Van Hollen – a Republican serving as the state co-chair of John McCain’s presidential campaign – of filing the suit for partisan gain and trying to purge legitimate voters from poll lists.

Van Hollen sued the state Government Accountability Board Wednesday, saying it must crosscheck voter names with driver’s license records for voters who registered to vote or changed their addresses on or after Jan. 1, 2006.

Such checks were required under federal law as of that date, but the board didn’t start performing them until last month because of technical problems.

Nat Robinson, the board’s elections administrator, said the board’s reading of the suit is that the attorney general is asking local clerks to check the names of everyone who filed registration papers on or after Jan. 1, 2006 – more than 1 million people.

Department of Justice officials have said they want election officials to check only the names of those who filed paperwork by mail or with special registration deputies that work for volunteer groups. That would affect about 241,000 voters.

Election officials say either requirement would cripple efforts to prepare for the Nov. 4 presidential election because they don’t have the staff to check so many names in the next eight weeks.

Also at issue is what would happen to those who fail the crosschecks. Board officials say it is common for voters to have data that does not match for innocent reasons, such as missing middle initials or mistyped driver’s license IDs. One in five voters who registered to vote last month initially failed the data check.

[…]

State Sen. Jon Erpenbach (D-Waunakee) said as the highest-ranking elected Republican in Wisconsin, Van Hollen “should be careful not to use his office to try to undermine democracy. Bureaucratic failures should not deny someone’s right to vote.”

That all sounds familiar enough. A Republican flunkie in charge of an election trying to keep people from voting because they know they can’t win otherwise.

But this is a real howler:

One Wisconsin Now, a group that has been criticizing McCain and other Republicans, said Van Hollen should step aside in the case because of his role with the McCain campaign.

St. John said the attacks were baseless.

“Fair elections is not a partisan issue,” he said.

These Republicans are hilarious.

H/T to JN

.

State Of The Race

by digby

Here’s the latest in my ongoing series of memos from an insider I call Deep Insight:

Under Bush and Cheney, oil and gas, drug companies, defense contractors, insurers and usurers control the e government of the United States, it does what they want. This is the predator state.
Jamie Galbraith, Professor
University of Texas

Professor Galbraith does not mince words, but there is plenty of evidence from the last eight years to support him. These interests have controlled federal regulatory policy and emptied the Treasury. Working hand-in-glove with their appointees in every part of the Executive Branch, they have turned the role of government upon itself. This not only helps their commercial interests but also denigrates the capacity and public esteem of the government. The ability of the public sector to build the social trust necessary to confront societal problems is undermined by the same people who want to “drown the government in the bathtub.” It is a win/win for them.

It remains to be seen how these interests react in the final two months of this campaign. With little chance that Republicans will win back the House or Senate, the Obama campaign must be prepared for these interests to spend heavily to save John McCain. Trade associations, new advocacy c4s, and 527s all allow them to advertise. A $30 or $40 million national or state-based advertising campaign would be a rounding error for these interests. Already done is a $3 million c4 ad campaign in Ohio and Michigan funded by a Texas billionaire associating Obama with SDS bomber Bill Ayers.

Karl Rove has signed on with a 527 named Freedom Watch. He has just been quoted as saying that he is trying to raise $100 million. Now he is an official “advisor” to McCain as well. Rove’s acolytes now run the McCain campaign so we shall see well-coordinated character assaults on Mr. Obama from inside and outside the McCain campaign. Whether ads are true or not, the mainstream media will duly cooperate by playing the ads explaining that they are a current “controversy.”

The McCain campaign itself has decided to run very highly produced ads featuring Paris Hilton and one other featuring a young white woman who says Barack has “dreamy eyes.” The subtext is clear. The overall strategy is to turn the facts of Obama’s life upside down. In this lie, Obama has led a sheltered and privileged life while McCain represents the gritty Horatio Alger story. Of course, in reality McCain is the son and grandson of Admirals and married to a woman worth a hundred million dollars. Rove’s comment that Obama is the “cool guy at the country club with the beautiful girl on his arm” needs no further exposition. Fear and resentment are the goals.

Ludicrously, David Broder stated that John McCain resorted to the low road because Obama would not do enough town halls with him. Obama is somewhat boxed in because if he draws attention to the GOP’s “race” strategy, he is accused of injecting the issue of race. This is a major crutch John McCain is using. In recent New York Times polling, 19% of white voters admitted thinking race relations in the US would be “worse” if Obama were elected. This line of “thinking” also shows up in focus groups. Twelve percent of the public thinks Obama is a Muslim. There are other heuristics that the GOP hopes low information voters will rely upon. As one indicator of the white working class vote, McCain led by 9 points prior to the Democratic convention in suburban MacComb County outside of Detroit. Obama has problems with white voters over 50 including married women.

With wages stagnant and affirmative action as the context, one GOP strategy will be clear. There will be a targeted appeal to white voters, implying that their economic misfortune is due to unfair advantage for minorities. It is a variation of the infamous Jesse Helms ad showing a pair of white hands crumbling a letter, captioned, “You deserved that promotion.” The Obama campaign had better be prepared for the next generation of ads in this vein.

In the words of one GOP strategist, part of the GOP appeal is to “old America.” This is the America of nostalgia associated with the 1950s. While many Americans would welcome the wage levels of the ‘50s and ‘60s, the rest of the decade can be mercifully forgotten. McCain will also continue to play the “patriot” card. In the vile words of Joe Lieberman, “McCain, not Obama, puts the country first.” Lieberman lied throughout his speech at the Republican convention. Democrats in the Senate really must do without him as soon as possible.

John McCain shook up the race with his VP choice. It appears a smart political move, aimed not at independent women, but to energize the religious right. She is more of a social conservative than George Bush. This will translate into volunteers walking the streets and handling the phone banks. Given Palin’s past performance in Alaska, the fossil and fuel industries and the NRA are also thrilled with her.

On a symbolic level, Palin will be marketed as the working mom of a conservative populist family, a combination of Annie Oakley and Working Girl. She will pretend to be a “maverick,” the image the Hollywood firm is trying to resurrect for McCain. She helps in the West and in the South. Obviously, the McCain campaign did not vet her properly. Once unfavorable news circulated through the Internet, the established media ran her through its gauntlet. She is quite unqualified to be President, so much for the McCain slogan, “Country First.”

The voters, of course, are screaming for policy change. When asked whether the current economic situation most resembles the ‘30s, ‘70s, or ‘90s, by a 10-point margin the public chooses the ‘30s. While objectively off, the perception is what matters. Encouraged by the weak dollar, the nation is exporting plenty of commodities like wheat, but not the manufactured goods necessary for broader based prosperity. Many areas of this country are really hurting and the situation is getting worse. Unemployment is at a 5-year high and the federal government just nationalized half the mortgage industry. Next up will be more banks and investment firms tumbling down.

The McCain campaign is running away from his GOP record with its advertising buy stating that the average voter is worse off than four years ago and then hilariously moves into how John McCain fights “big oil.” The McCain ads are completely misleading. The press is not going to correct the McCain campaign lies in these ads. As Duncan Black noted, repeating debunked lies is a feature – not a bug – in the GOP system.

The D.C. press will continue its kid glove treatment of McCain, in John Marshall’s words, “grading on a curve.” It is ludicrous to watch the GOP once again attack the media for asking some questions about Palin’s qualifications. The press has once again been cowed by the Republicans, and she can only be interviewed by handpicked press who show deference. I suppose like Charles Gibson. Cokie Roberts criticized Obama for vacationing in the home of his youth and visiting his grandmother. Bodysurfing in Hawaii instead of golfing at Myrtle Beach is apparently too exotic for Ms. Roberts. She is vying with the Post’s Sally Quinn as the social arbiter of what is acceptable to the Beltway elite.

In The Way of the World, Ron Suskind’s explosive new book on Iraq, he says that the US government bribed the former Iraq intelligence chief and relocated him to Jordan. Agents then produced a bogus memo from him to Saddam saying the intelligence chief had met with a 9/11 bomber. One might think this would deserve screaming headlines but the story was only given attention by Keith Oberman and Jon Stewart. The press now treats Bush as irrelevant. As part of this scenario, seeing George Bush in public before November will be a game of “Where’s Waldo?”

In his acceptance speech Obama developed a very useful overall line of attack against McCain. He needs to continue a clear critique of the current economic situation and also offer a forward-looking message about the next generation of jobs. Some of his advertising has been good in this vein but he has to attack Bush-McCain economics every day.
Obama also needs to continue right after McCain on his Bush like foreign policy. McCain certainly looks like he is itching for more combat, as one wag put it; he is President Sonny Corleone after 8 years of Fredo. He has turned Iraq into a story about “winning” and is now trying to turn the Russian/Georgia border war into an international revival of the Cold War.

It is very helpful that Obama’s August “rope a dope” is over. One cannot win a Presidential election playing defense or nice. There is little paid communication on the Presidential race from left of center organizations. This would have been useful if for no other reason than to keep George Bush and his failed policies front and center. The Obama campaign has the communication landscape to itself.

The Republicans have been winning the day-to-day “free” press war. Of course it helps if much of the press is your “base.” To date, the McCain campaign has had better though highly misleading ads. The Obama advertising does not yet reflect the quality of his candidacy. It looks and sounds like traditional political advertising.

McCain has outspent Obama in traditional battleground states like Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan, in some cases by large margins, such as by $1 million in Ohio. On the other hand, Obama has had to himself traditional GOP states like North Carolina, Virginia and North Dakota. Granted that McCain was forced to burn through his primary money ahead of the GOP convention. But one wonders why the Obama campaign was spending ad dollars in Georgia. At the end of the day when outside conservative groups are added in, Obama will likely not command that significant a financial advantage over the final two months.

The GOP is far better at employing surrogates. In a 24/7 news cycle, the Democrats need better attacks that make news. Of course some of the attacks are ridiculous as in the GOP “lipstick on a pig” smear. But it is the reality, the modern media as a clown show. It was a mistake of the Obama campaign to take Wes Clark out of the equation for stating the obvious about McCain’s military record. The Democrats do not have an excess of 4 star generals ready for appearance on TV. Joe Biden is fine as the Vice Presidential candidate, but he has to match the Republicans with defense of Barack Obama and attacks on McCain. He has already said John McCain is a friend, now it is time to go after their ticket and its priorities. He is not going to garner the type of coverage as Palin unless he is provocative.

The Obama field program will be unprecedented, but will only make the deciding difference if the fundamental framework of the election is for a referendum on failed Republican policy. The campaign still has an enthusiasm advantage that will result in more committed volunteers willing to walk precincts in their neighborhoods. But Republicans know how to turn out the conservative base, now more energized with Palin. On the other hand, this is the first election where the Democrats should have a technology advantage due to the superiority in digital communications like text messaging.

After both conventions, the race is now essentially tied in the polls. One interesting wild card in this election is the dwindling undecided vote. Is this a threshold election? Are these voters the persuadable ones who only focus on elections in October? As Obama establishes himself as a plausible President, will they break his way because of their underlying dissatisfaction with the direction of the country? This mirrors the scenario in 1980. Is there an element of prejudice present that voters will not reveal to a pollster? Or are pollsters consistently understating the turnout potential of young people and minorities who only use cell phones?

.

Win, Win, Lose, Lose

by digby

I get accused of being unnecessarily gloomy, but I’m positively giddy with optimism compared to K-Drum:

John McCain has obviously decided that he can’t win a straight-up fight, so he’s decided instead to wage a battle of character assassination, relentless lies, and culture war armageddon. So what happens on November 5th?

If McCain wins, he’ll face a Democratic congress that’s beyond furious. Losing is one thing, but after eight years of George Bush and Karl Rove, losing a vicious campaign like this one will cause Dems to go berserk. They won’t even return McCain’s phone calls, let alone work with him on legislation. It’ll be four years of all-out war.

And what if Obama wins? The last time a Democrat won after a resurgence of the culture war right, we got eight years of madness, climaxing in an impeachment spectacle unlike anything we’d seen in a century. If it happens again, with the lunatic brigade newly empowered and shrieking for blood, Obama will be another Clinton and we’ll be in for another eight years of near psychotic dementia.

Am I exaggerating? Sure. Am I exaggerating a lot? I don’t think so. McCain, in his overwhelming desire for office, is unloosing forces that are likely to make the country only barely governable no matter who wins. This would be very bad juju at any time, but George Bush has so seriously weakened the country over the course of his administration that we don’t have a lot of room for error left if we want to avoid losing the war on terror for good and turning America into a banana republic while we’re at it. We need to start turning the ship around now.

I think he’s probably right. However, I actually don’t think it’s because of McCain’s choice to wage a scorched earth presidential campaign. It’s because Republicans believe in scorched earth politics.

Until the modern conservative movement of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan has run its course, there will be no “post partisanship.” This kind of politics defines them. Even if Obama were comfortably ahead and the Republicans had no chance they would wage this kind of campaign and unless they lose by a substantial margin to someone who has completely repudiated their program, they will always fight a Democratic president with psychotic dementia. For them, the action is the juice. Conservatism itself has to be soundly defeated, not accommodated.

I’m not gloomy about that because I accept it as a necessary fight. I’m pretty sure that people are pretty tired of stale Reagonomics, preening chauvanism and culture wars, but they don’t have a clear picture of the alternative. I believe that if Democrats would make the arguments and take the battle to the Republicans, they might be able to break this deadlock. Call me a glass half broken kind of person.

.

Celebrity Watch

by digby

Paris and Britney can only dreeam of such attention:

She may have traveled to Dulles International Airport in style — with much of I-66 and the Dulles Toll Road closed to traffic to accommodate the vice presidential motorcade — but Gov. Sarah Palin’s departure for Alaska has been delayed by an excessive amount of baggage. That’s actual, not metaphorical, baggage. “We’re overweight. We’re not taking off until we lose 10 bags,” Cecil Wallace, a press advance lead on the trip, announced. He and other logistics organizers pleaded with network camera crews to leave some of their gear behind because the cargo hold was too overloaded and the plane too heavy to make the entire trip. […]
In addition to the networks, the campaign has in tow an “Entertainment Tonight” contingent. It is unclear whether the “Straight Talk II” will be on the record or not. On a previous flight, Palin advisers tried to impose an off the record policy for the governor, who so far in the campaign has only responded to questions from People magazine.

“I know you are but what am I” politics in full effect.

.

Spike

by dday

Digby already mentioned the breaking story about John McCain’s strong-arming of the DEA to stop them from investigating his wife’s prescription drug theft. Raw Story adds more to the case.

Tom Gosinski, a former employee of the medical-aid charity Cindy McCain used as personal supplier of Percocet and Vicodin, is speaking out publicly for the first time.

On Wednesday, Gosinski sat down with RAW STORY and other outlets to tell his story and distribute copies of his personal journal from his time with the American Voluntary Medical Team in the last half of 1992, where he voiced ever more acute concerns and frustrations over McCain’s drug use and its impact on her mood and job performance.

“My journal wasn’t to trash Cindy or anything,” he says. “My journal was kept because I came in contact with so many people. It was a way of keeping an ongoing biography of all the people I met, so I could refer back to it.”

He says he can’t buy the official McCain camp line that Cindy’s drug abuse was kept from her husband, he saw and heard too much for any of their stories to make sense — like the time Cindy was allegedly taken to the hospital after an overdose and John rushed in to berate the doctors and nurses there before moving Cindy to their secluded Sedona ranch. Then there were the Hensley family interventions and the fact that Cindy’s drug abuse came to be something of an open secret among employees of the charity.

There’s a lot here, from Gosinski being fired and blackballed for knowing too much about Cindy’s drug abuse, to Cindy getting a diplomatic passport from her husband’s Senate office so she wouldn’t be searched in airports with all of these drugs, and on and on.

It’s a dense story. But there’s another aspect to it revealed today by John Aravosis. Apparently, the Washington Post recorded an interview with Gosinski that they are hiding from the public.

Go to Google. Type in the name “gosinski.” Look at the sixth result.

John Mccain abused his power to keep it a…. secret, perhaps? This isn’t a story about the wife, it’s a story about the Senator possibly using his office to obstruct justice for personal gain. Sounds a lot like Troopergate in fact. Definitely a story.

But when you click the link and go to the Washington Post’s Web site, there’s nothing there, just a blank template with no content.

I just checked this a second ago. It’s still on Google, and there’s still a blank template at WaPo when you click on the link.

This is a spiked story. There’s plenty of precedent for this in 2004, when 60 Minutes delayed broadcast of a story about Iraq, Niger and yellowcake that would have been very damaging to President Bush until after the election. There are other examples as well.

This now becomes the scandal. It is completely inappropriate for the Washington Post to spike a legitimate news story about the corruption of a Presidential candidate, especially considering that candidate is running on this platform of reform. And all the other news outlets need to be informed of this as well. If there’s enough pressure, one of them may see the tactical value in going forward with interviewing a willing witness before their competitors. If that’s how the news business still works, anyway.

Some phone calls need to be made.

LATE UPDATE: That story did finally appear in the WaPo pages today. My commentary on it is here. They seem to have left out some key details.

.

Because They Can

by digby

They never quit:

Mississippi’s governor, Haley Barbour, and its secretary of state have come up with a particularly cynical dirty trick for the November election. Let’s call it: “Where’s the Senate race?”

Defying state law, they have decided to hide a hard-fought race for the United States Senate at the bottom of the ballot, where they clearly are hoping some voters will overlook it. Their proposed design is not only illegal. It shows a deep contempt for Mississippi’s voters.

Republicans have long had a lock on the state’s two Senate seats. But this year, former Gov. Ronnie Musgrove, a Democrat, has been running close to Senator Roger Wicker, a Republican, in the polls. Mr. Wicker was appointed to the seat by Governor Barbour in late December after Trent Lott stepped down.

Mississippi election law clearly states that federal elections must go at the top of ballots. And the secretary of state, Delbert Hosemann, plans to list the state’s other Senate race — incumbent Thad Cochran is running far ahead of his Democratic challenger, Erik Fleming — where it belongs, right below the presidential contest.

But Mr. Hosemann argues that because the Wicker-Musgrove race is a special election to fill the remainder of Mr. Lott’s term, he is free to place it at the bottom, below state and county races.

Mr. Hosemann is insisting on that placement even after the state attorney general’s office notified him that his ballot design violates state law.

This is flat out vote suppression and they aren’t even trying to hide it. In fact, they’re proud of it. If they could get away with using the state police to run roadblocks and ask everyone who they plan to vote for before letting them through, they’d do that too.

I hope that there will be some of that big Dem money spent on voter education for stuff like this, but I don’t know if there’s enough of it or if it’s considered part of the program. But it shouldn’t have to be. The law is clear and the principle is even clearer.

The Republican party is basically a criminal operation at this point and they are operating in plain sight. Gawd help us if they stay in power for four more years.

Oh, and anyone who thinks McCain will do anything about this stuff is living in a dream world. He could do something about it right now if he wanted to. And let’s just say his behavior of the past few days doesn’t exactly lend itself to any more bragging about his honor and integrity. He’s as much a vicious partisan as Karl Rove or Tom Delay.

Dday has more in his long post about GOTV from this morning.

.

Heckuva Job

by digby

Bushie:

Seven years after 9/11, al Qaida and its allies are gaining ground across the region where the plot was hatched, staging their most lethal attacks yet against NATO forces and posing a growing threat to the U.S.-backed governments in Afghanistan and nuclear-armed Pakistan. While there have been no new strikes on the U.S. homeland, the Islamic insurrection inspired by Osama bin Laden has claimed thousands of casualties and displaced tens of thousands of people and shows no sign of slackening in the face of history’s most powerful military alliance.The insurgency now stretches from Afghanistan’s border with Iran through the southern half of the country. The Taliban now are able to interdict three of the four major highways that connect Kabul, the capital, to the rest of the country. “I am not convinced we are winning it in Afghanistan,” Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, conceded before a congressional committee on Tuesday.

And heckuva job to McCain as well who, on the day of the attacks began agitating for the US to disperse its forces in stupid useless wars against countries that hadn’t attacked us and weren’t harboring terrorists. Great job. Let’s not change horses in mid stream.

.

Stop “Helping”

by digby

As we watch the Kewl Kidz pat themselves on the backs for rejecting McCain’s horrible lies and distortions, we might consider this before we start writing them letters of appreciation:

Campaign ads-that-aren’t are “the oldest trick going,” says Kenneth Goldstein, a University of Wisconsin political scientist who tracks political advertising. “You call a press conference, announce the ad, then run it once or twice. It’s like Lucy pulling the football from Charlie Brown.”

This time around, both major-party candidates have been playing the game, reaping a small bonanza of attention from cable and local news stations that have given the ads a free ride. McCain’s campaign has been more aggressive and arguably more effective than Obama’s, launching spots that have undercut Obama just when he seemed to be on the ascent.

Yesterday, for instance, the McCain campaign released a commercial called “Lipstick,” which attacks Obama for allegedly smearing vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin by saying “You can’t put lipstick on a pig.” The ad, however, appears to be more of a video press release than a traditional commercial. McCain hasn’t announced any airtime buys for it, and at 35 seconds, its length isn’t standard for a TV commercial.

Obama’s representatives have repeatedly complained about the content of McCain’s vapor ads, as well as about the media’s coverage of them. Obama spokesman Nick Shapiro blasted McCain for the strategy, saying in a statement that McCain was using “Bush political tactics” to try to “distract the media.”

One ad unveiled by McCain quotes unfavorable comments about Obama made by the Democratic nominee’s running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, during the primaries; this ad has aired just seven times since it was announced two weeks ago, according to Campaign Media Analysis Group (CMAG), an Arlington-based firm that tracks political advertising. Another McCain spot that claimed — erroneously — that Obama “made time to go the gym” instead of visiting wounded troops during his visit to Europe this summer has aired just nine times, appearing in only three cities.

In each case, however, broadcast and print reporters gave McCain’s claims wide circulation.

All day long yesterday, as they repeatedly told their audience that this kind of “dirty politics” was no longer viable, they showed that stupid Lipstick ad. Again and again. And again.

I know they’re very proud of themselves and all for arguing with Republicans for hours about an ad the McCain campaign sought to circulate on the cheap and create a controversy, but if they really wanted to stop this kind of politics they wouldn’t preen for the cameras and tell the audience how much integrity they have because they disagree with the ad. They wouldn’t show it.

.

Senator Strongarm

by digby

Stoller has a scoop:

A whistleblower is coming forth against John and Cindy McCain, and the picture he is painting is not a pretty one. You’ve probably heard about Cindy McCain stealing prescription drugs from her charity in the 1990s. Today, Tom Gosinski, her former employee and a close friend of the McCain’s, came out on the record about the entire sordid episode. And it appears that McCain used his Senate staff and resources to cover up Cindy’s drug use, and potentially to prevent the Drug Enforcement Agency from investigating his wife’s theft of illegal prescription drugs. John McCain certainly used his political connections to begin a campaign of intimidation against Gosinski, because at the time – this was after the Keating 5 scandal – another major scandal would have derailed his career. Gosinski stayed quiet out of fear until today; a recent fight with cancer has strengthened his resolve. As he told me today, if he can beat cancer, he can go on the record regarding how the McCain’s do business. There’s More..


There’s Video too.

I don’t blame the whistleblower for keeping quiet all this time. McNasty has a serious problem with his temper and this is exactly the kind of thing that makes him lose it.

.