Skip to content

Month: May 2010

Los Suns — And TNT speak out on SB 1070

Los Suns

by digby

I don’t think anyone can underestimate just how powerful it is to have these major sports figures coming out against SB 1070. Amato’s been all over the sports angle and caught this excellent moment. I happened to catch this segment last night myself because even though I don’t even like basketball I’ve developed an absurd adolescent crush on Steve Nash for his outspoken decency and leadership of his team around this issue. These guys were great too:

Los Suns are wearing their shirts again, showing that it wasn’t just a Cinco de Mayo one off but a true sign of solidarity. Good for them.

.

BBC Live Feed — their pundits are better than our pundits

BBC Live Feed

by digby

Oh dear, it looks like they may have something of a Florida situation on their hands in Britain. People turned away from the polls, bad exit polls etc. In any case it’s unknown at this point if they’re going to have a hung parliament, if the conservatives have eked out enough to form a majority or if the Lib Dems made an even respectable showing much less the upheaval they seemed to promise.

The BBC’s got very entertaining live coverage going. Their pundits are much more fun than ours:

Still, Baby, Still — BPs call boys and girls

Still Baby Still

by digby

This comes from the bonafide, sanctioned Institute for Southern Studies, not some soy swallowing California liberal douchebag like* me:

With oil still gushing from the site of BP’s failed Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf — a disaster that’s now likely to eclipse the scale of the Exxon Valdez — some politicians are rethinking the “drill, baby, drill” push for expanded offshore drilling.

But for others — including many leading Republicans and a few Democrats — the message seems to be: “Still, baby, still!”

Facing South took a tally of where key politicians stand in the wake of the Gulf oil disaster:

GULF COAST

The political fallout from the spill has been most interesting in the states nearest to the disaster:

* In Alabama, GOP Gov. Bob Riley is reconsidering his once-staunch support for drilling. In 2008, he said “we need to drill” and found it “astonishing” Congress wouldn’t lift a drilling moratorium. But when asked about his views on Wednesday, Riley said he will have “a completely different attitude” if the state’s efforts to protect their shoreline failed.

* Riley’s fellow AL Republican Sen. Richard Shelby was less reflective, saying Congress should “absolutely” move forward with offshore drilling: “We can learn something from this.”

* Gov. Haley Barbour in Mississippi doesn’t appear to think there’s anything to be learned at all: In an interview with CNN, he downplayed any potential fallout from the spill, saying it’s “not particularly damaging.” He’s still pro-drill.

* In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) has focused his statements on the immediate disaster response, as has Rep. Joseph Cao (R). But Sen. Mary Landrieu (D) immediately made a statement from the floor: “It is more risky to import our oil in tankers than it is to drill for it offshore, even considering this disaster that we’re dealing with today. Retreat is not an option. … We must continue to drill.” Sen. David Vitter (R) also encouraged Obama to press forward with new drilling projects.

* As for Texas, Gov. Rick Perry (R) drew criticism for describing the disaster as an unavoidable “Act of God” en route to calling to stay the course on drilling.

[…]

UPDATE: We’d be remiss not to include Blue Dog Rep. Gene Taylor’s (D) gem from earlier in the week, which seemed to compare the catastrophe to a school lunch mishap:

What I want people to know is this isn’t Katrina. This is not Armageddon. I did this for the Coast Guard many years ago. Yeah, it’s bad. And it’s terrible that there’s a spill out there. But I would remind people that the oil is twenty miles from any marsh. … That chocolate milk looking spill starts breaking up in smaller pieces … It is tending to break up naturally.

Meanwhile:

BP has long touted itself as a “green” company interested not only in oil and other fossil fuels, but in renewable energy like wind and solar. But as Rebecca Lefton reported on ThinkProgress last week, BP barely invests anything in clean energy — most of its green campaign is actually just a massive advertising gimmick to conceal the truth about the company. While BP has spent hundreds of millions building its brand, it has offshored the dirty work of promoting expanded drilling to right-wing front groups and trade associations. In a 2007 PowerPoint presentation obtained by ThinkProgress, BP appears to have been interested in fighting to open up protected waters to new offshore drilling. The presentation, organized by the BP-funded front group “Consumer Energy Alliance,” was delivered at the American Gas Association’s marketing meeting in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida. The presentation calls for a five-year plan to build grassroots support to open wide swaths of both the East and West coasts to new drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf.

How much money has BP given to these Gulf state politicians?

A lot.

* Bitchy thing for me to say and I regret it. Bad day. Mea culpa.

.

The MOU’s play with fire — Wall Street jokers think nobody’s listening

The MOUs Play With Fire

by digby

I’ve been watching the riots in Greece all morning as people are burning down banks and all manner of violence is hitting the streets there. As I write this, the DOW is down 980 points. Looks like we’ve a problem.

For some reason my thoughts wandered to this:

Already, Fabulous Fab—as he calls himself in e-mails released by the SEC—has two Facebook fan pages devoted to him. New York magazine breathlessly reported on his life, including the $4,000-a-month Manhattan apartment he once rented. The 15 Wall Street employees—20- and 30-something bankers, traders, and former Goldman employees—whom NEWSWEEK interviewed for this piece say they admire the way Tourre foresaw the collapse in the housing market and structured a lucrative deal for his client, hedge-fund impresario John Paulson. Goldman Sachs refused to comment or to pass along Tourre’s contact information. “Everyone thinks he has a bit of swagger,” says former investment banker and Columbia Business School professor David Beim. “Everyone is cheering for him.”

[…]

For these young Wall Street types, Tourre embodies the culture of the financial world and offers a road map for success. He’s the real-life Gordon Gekko from the movie Wall Street: the cocky alpha male who writes e-mails in which he calls himself the “only potential survivor … standing in the middle of all of these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades.” He’s a doppelgänger to Michael Lewis’s autobiographical protagonist in Liar’s Poker, who sells bad products to unknowing chump investors, and he’s becoming a cultural icon to his contemporaries because they empathize with him. One of them could just as easily have been the salesman on the Abacus deal, if only they had been that smart or lucky. “There’s a self-serving role in this. If what he did is wrong, then what they do is wrong on a daily basis,” says Adam Galinsky, professor of ethics and leadership at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management. “It’s not wrong to them, because it’s the water they swim in.”

This fascination with Tourre also spells disaster for transforming or regulating Wall Street. The future Fabulous Fabs of the world will not be deterred by this case, says Wall Street historian Charles Geisst, because this line of work will continue to appeal to those who want to make piles of money or develop financial products in lieu of curing cancer, building bridges, or marketing tangible products. To the bankers, Tourre’s e-mails in which he expresses doubt about the validity of the products he’s selling only make him that much more likable. “The fact that his e-mails have a slight sarcastic bentd to them makes them more noteworthy,” says Galinsky. “He’s not just a machine. He has a playful nature. At some level, the tone mitigates it. At some level, it makes it more horrific.”

Keep swaggering boys. Keep patting yourselves on the back. Keep telling the dumb rubes you deserve these million dollar bonuses for treating them like your playthings. And pray that this situation doesn’t get any worse.

MSNBC anchor: Is what we’re seeing here a preview of what we’re seeing in Greece?

Ratigan: Yes. What you have is a corrupt government rigging the game for special interests … the banking industry being the most obvious right now where we subsidize the TBTF banks. And when that is done where the government comes out and says, Alex, “we’re going to have an austerity measure for you and we’re going to raise taxes on you,” and the people say, “hang on a moment, the government is corrupt and rigging the game for special interests, has given all this money away to bankers and is now turning its attention back to the American people — basically to say they’re going to cut our social security in order to pay for the banks.”

That’s the sort of thing that gets people pretty upset.

Update: CNBC is saying the drop in the DOW is because of financial reform. Now that’s funny.

Update II: now they’re saying it was a “glitch.”
Evidently, the fact that there were pics all over the TV at that very moment of banks burning in Greece for the second night, couldn’t possibly have contributed to a bunch of heroic Galts fouling their trousers.

h/t to JS

Rule ‘O Law Yadda, Yadda, Yadda — Hugh Hewitt teaches law? What kind? Murphy’s?

Rule ‘O Law — Yadda, Yadda, Yadda

by digby

Instaputz caught the perfect illustration of how the lawless Right really sees the constitution in this exchange between Michael Isikoff and Hugh Hewitt:

MI: And he waived, and he waived his Miranda rights. Look, there probably will be a discussion of this. But all I’m saying is we are still a country of laws. You can’t just make it up as you go along.

HH: But that’s cliché.

MI: And you know, maybe…

HH: That’s just cliché. We’re a country of laws. I know that. I teach it.

As Instaputz points out: this is a cliché authored by John Adams. But what did he know?

BTW: Did you know they’re calling Lieberman’s new citizen strip bill the TEA act? Those Tea Party protectors of the constitution must be so proud.

But they also should worry just a little bit about this, don’t you think? After an evil socialist usurper is in the White House and a communist succubus is running the State Department, which will be given the power to decide who should and shouldn’t be stripped of citizenship and sent off to FEMA camps Gitmo. Can they really be trusted not to go after the nice law abiding tea partiers?

.

Netroots In Solidarity — with our service workers brothers and sisters.

Netroots In Solidarity

by digby

Netroots Nation is doing some activist work with the help of a Rhode Island state Rep (and local blogger!) And they need your help:

Hi — this is Rhode Island State Rep. David Segal. The folks at Netroots Nation and RIFuture.org have done a great job of shining the spotlight on a labor dispute we are facing locally in Providence — the outcome of which will directly decide whether the Netroots Nation conference will bring approximately $2 million in economic activity to our area in 2011. As a progressive elected official who’s worked with the hotel workers and other service employees across the city and state for nearly a decade, I want to do my part to increase pressure on management on behalf of workers. (And as co-founder of local progressive blogs RIFuture.org and ProvidenceDailyDose.com, I especially look forward to welcoming progressives from around the nation to Providence.) Today, I’m asking for your help, by signing a petition in support of the workers that I will deliver directly to the hotel management — and will invite local media to cover. You can sign it here.$2 million is just the immediate pay-off our state would get from the Netroots Nation conference. Providence has a burgeoning tech and online community, and as we look to brand ourselves as a tech-savvy city, it’s difficult to think of a bigger opportunity that could have fallen into our lap.
The Netroots has an opportunity to leverage both its media megaphone and its pocketbook to do some direct good for these hotel workers. We may be cheeto-munching nerds but if we want a real progressive movement, showing solidarity with our service worker brothers and sisters is an important part of the deal.
This one doesn’t require any money, just a few minutes of your time:
Please support the effort to win this fight for workers — and the state of Rhode Island — here.

.

84 Stories — Thats how many Politico ran on the White House correspondents dinner

84 Stories

by digby

That’s how many Politico ran — on the breaking news and important analysis of the White House Correspondents dinner:

This gathering has about as much to do with covering the American presidency as a beauty contest has to do with — well, let’s just leave it as a beauty contest. Each year, the dinner, according to press coverage, seems to grow in size and glamour, flooded with beautiful and handsome Hollywood stars and television entertainers as guests of journalists, who have also grown to become stars, and news organizations. It is a testimonial to the celebrity culture that dominates much of Washington and New York journalism. (The New York Times, to its great credit, in my opinion, does not attend.) It is also, in my opinion, an embarrassment, just one more brick on the pile that buries confidence in the U.S. press. The hot new face of American journalism and political reporting, Politico, posted 84 stories about the dinner by my last count. All of it great stuff, no doubt.

This year for some reason was the giddiest I’ve ever seen the press act publicly about this thing. (For all I know they always behave like fools in private over the stupid thing.) The fans of teen dream Justin Bieber — who attended by the way — actually behaved in a much more restrained manner.

The DC press should be embarrassed to be seen by the whole world as giggling school girls but they aren’t. They actually think people like this stuff — they covered it like it was the Oscars and they were the stars. But what Michael Getler says is correct; it’s just another way in which they are eroding people’s trust in journalism. But then sometimes I think that’s the Politico‘s real mission.

.

Used Up -Dave Obey’s farewell is depressing

Used Up

by digby

This is rather heartbreaking:

May 5, 2010

Statement by Congressman David R. Obey

Seventh District Congressman Dave Obey (D-WI) released the following
statement today:

In December I will have been in public service for 48 years – over 6
years in the Wisconsin State Legislature and almost 42 years in the
U.S. Congress. I have served in the House longer than anyone in
Wisconsin history. God and my constituents have been incredibly good
to me.

When I was a kid growing up in Wausau I never dreamed that I would
have even one-tenth of the opportunities that have come my way. I
hope that I have used those opportunities to do the most that could be
done for the causes I believe in: fairer taxes; greater economic
opportunity; better schools; affordable health care; expanded
education and health care benefits for veterans; research that will
help us fight diseases like cancer, diabetes and Parkinson’s; better
health, safety, and economic security for workers; cleaner air; and
water and preservation of National Parks and public places.

The people of Northern Wisconsin have given me the honor and the
privilege of representing them on the great issues of our times,
ranging from Vietnam to Watergate, the Iranian hostage crisis, the
Reagan deficits, Iran-Contra, the collapse of communism, two Gulf
Wars, the economic and budget reforms of the early 1990s, the
government shut down, 9/11, and the economic meltdown of the past
decade.

For a decade, as Chairman of the Foreign Operations Subcommittee, I
had the privilege of helping lead the effort to meet our
responsibilities to our fellow human beings around the globe who share
this planet with us, but do not share our same good fortune. During
that time, we consistently moved foreign aid money away from support
of military dictators to the expansion of long-term development
activities and through programs like UNICEF contributed to saving
millions of children’s lives.

I’m especially proud of the role I paid in resisting American
colonialism in Central America, working with people like James Baker,
Dave Bonior, Jim Wright, Lee Hamilton, Matt McHugh, Joe Moakley, and
Tom Foley to end the Contra War in Nicaragua. Probably, the most
important historic role the committee played was the bipartisan work
we did with the George H. Bush Administration and officials like
Secretary Lawrence Eagleburger in helping Eastern European countries
to transition from communist authoritarianism to Western capitalist
democracies after the fall of the Berlin wall and the collapse of the
Soviet Union.

Although it happened a long time ago, I am especially proud of the
losing fight that I helped wage with Congressmen Henry Reuss and Mo
Udall to prevent the passage of the fiscally irresponsible Reagan
budgets, which at a time of devastating inflation cut taxes at the
same time the defense budget was being doubled, all paid for with
borrowed money, more than tripling the long-term budget deficit
picture. The Obey-Udall-Reuss alternative budget was a progressive
alternative to the budgets of both parties, which spent less, borrowed
less, and produced smaller deficits than either the Democratic or
Republican base bills, and won the support of a majority of
Democrats. At the time our actions were hugely unpopular. About 70%
of the voters in my district supported Reagan’s budget, but time has
proven us right.

Today, I am similarly proud that I was the principle author of the
much maligned but absolutely essential Economic Recovery Act of 2009,
which in the midst of the deepest and most dangerous economic
catastrophe in 70 years, has pumped desperately needed purchasing
power into the economy to cushion the fall and reduced the number of
families whose breadwinners were thrown out of work. When it was
passed last year, the American economy was losing 750,000 jobs per
month. Last month, by contrast, the economy added 162,000 jobs, the
largest increase in three years. That corner could not have been
turned without the Recovery Act. My only apology is that it should
have been larger, but it was the most that the system would bear at
the time.

I am especially pleased to have had the privilege of presiding over
the House when it passed the historic health insurance reform
legislation three weeks ago. I have been waiting for that moment for
41 years and its arrival – finally – made all the frustrations of
public life worth it.

During my Congressional service, I have also tried to do what I could
to keep us out of misguided wars and I have fought to reform the
political institutions – especially, the Congress – to improve the
quality of their work and to strengthen public confidence in them.
And despite the misguided and disastrously destructive decisions of
the U.S. Supreme Court that have put the system of American elections
on the auction block, I have worked to limit the influence of private
money in elections that by definition should be public events.

I think that along the way I have made a difference for the district
and state that I represent and for the country.

But there is a time to stay and a time to go. And this is my time to
go. I hate to do it. There is so much that needs to be done. But,
frankly, I am bone tired. When I first put my name on the ballot for
the State Assembly in 1962, I was 23 years old. Now, 48 years later,
I will soon be 72. When I went to Congress in 1969, I was the
youngest member of the House of Representatives. I’m not anymore.
Since that first day in 1962, I have gone through 25 elections and
engaged in countless battles.

I’m ready to turn the page, and I think, frankly, that my district is
ready for someone new to make a fresh start. Not someone who poses as
a fresh face, but would in reality take us back to the “good old days”
of Bush tax cuts for the rich and a misguided Iraq war. Not someone
whose idea of a fresh idea is to say: “Let the market do it,” which
translated means: “Let the corporate elites, big banks, and Wall
Street big shots and insurance company CEO’s do anything they want
with no regulation to protect investors and consumers.” There is
nothing fresh about that. No, what the 7th district deserves and what
the country deserves is for someone to step up who can be counted on
to put working people first, someone who will bring fresh eyes and
fresh energy to the battle, someone who won’t use slick words and an
actor’s ability to hide the fact that he is willing to gut and
privatize Social Security and Medicare and abandon working people to
the arbitrary power of America’s corporate and economic elite.

When I first ran for Congress I wanted to do three things:

1) The first was to help make our economic system more fair for the
poor and for middle class working families. Unfortunately, powerful
economic and political forces have largely frustrated that effort.
Over the last 30 years we have seen the largest transfer of income up
the income scale in history. In fact, for six straight years under
George W. Bush, over 90% of all the income growth in the country went
into the pockets of the wealthiest 10%. The other 90% of the
population – the regular people of the country – got table scraps. I
regret not being able to do more to turn that around. That, and the
inability of the political system to achieve the public financing of
political campaigns, represent the biggest disappointments of my
public life.

2) My second goal was to expand federal support for education in order
to expand opportunity for every American. That has been a hard slog,
but, especially in the last three years, we have been able to move a
large amount of federal resources to do just that. Just this last
year, we were able to greatly enhance federal support for student
aid. It is not enough, but it makes a difference.

3) My third goal was to help move this country into the ranks of
civilized nations by making it possible for almost every American to
receive quality health care without begging. For years I despaired of
ever getting that done. But last month, I had the great privilege of
presiding over the House of Representatives as it finally completed
action on historic health insurance reform legislation.

Over the past few years, whenever a member of the press asked if I was
contemplating retirement, I would respond by saying that I did not
want to leave Congress until we had passed health care reform. Well,
now it has. And I can leave with the knowledge that thanks to Speaker
Pelosi and President Obama and so many others, we got the job done. I
haven’t done all the big things that I wanted to do when I started
out, but I’ve done all the big things I’m likely to do.

Frankly, I had considered retiring after the 2000 election, but I
became so angered by the policies of the Bush administration that I
decided to stick around as long as he was here. In 2002, after a year-
long reapportionment struggle, which devoured my time and the time of
my colleague Jim Sensenbrenner, I publicly stated I would not be
around for another one. That is exactly what I would face if I
returned to Congress next year. I simply don’t want to do it.

Many years ago, in an interview with Richard Cohen, I told him that
the way I looked at public service, I believe the job of a good
politician was to be used up fighting on behalf of causes you believed
in, and when you are used up, to step aside and let someone else carry
on the battle. Well, today I feel used up.

In the last months, two colleagues, Charlie Wilson and Jack Murtha,
have died. Both were 76. For me, that is only four years away. At
the end of this term I will have served in the House longer than all
but 18 of the 10,637 men and women who have ever served there. The
wear and tear is beginning to take its toll. Given that fact, I have
to ask myself how I want to spend the time I have left. Frankly, I do
not know what I will do next. All I do know is that there has to be
more to life than explaining the ridiculous, accountability destroying
rules of the Senate to confused, angry, and frustrated constituents.

I absolutely believe that, after the economy returns to a decent
level of growth, we must attack our long-term budget deficit. But,
perhaps I expect too much because, in addition to an attack on the
federal budget deficit, I also want to see an equal determination to
attack the family security deficit, the family income deficit, and the
opportunity deficit which also plague the American people.

I am, frankly, weary of having to beg on a daily basis that both
parties recognize that we do no favor for the country if we neglect to
make the long-term investments in education, science, health, and
energy that are necessary to modernize our economy and decline to
raise the revenue needed to pay for those crucial investments. I do
not want to be in a position as Chairman of the Appropriations
Committee of producing and defending lowest common denominator
legislation that is inadequate to that task and, given the mood of the
country, that is what I would have to do if I stayed.

I am also increasingly weary of having to deal with a press which has
become increasingly focused on trivia, driven at least in part by the
financial collapse of the news industry and the need, with the 24-hour
news cycle, to fill the air waves with hot air. I say that
regretfully because I regard what is happening to the news profession
as nothing short of a national catastrophe which I know pains many
quality journalists as much as it pains me. Both our professions have
been coarsened in recent years and the nation is the loser for it.

Let me close by thanking some people.

First, let me thank my wife, Joan, who has put up with so much and
endured so much so that I might follow my dream of public service.
When she agreed to marry me, she thought she was getting a college
teacher. Instead, she got stuck with the “charms” of political life.
Whatever good I’ve done, I could not have done without her.

Let me also thank my two sons, Craig and Douglas, who have also
shared in the burden of public service. Craig has spent his adult
life trying to bring health care to people who needed it, trying to
protect workers in the work place, and trying to protect our precious
public lands from abuse by special interests and their mouthpieces in
government. Doug has spent his life as a working journalist, first
covering Capitol Hill, and then informing his readers about the
realities of the politics of environmental protection and the
interaction between science and politics on the profoundly important
issue of global climate change.

Let me thank all those who have worked with me as staff through the
years – those who have worked in my district offices in Wisconsin, in
my personal office in Washington, my Joint Economic Committee staff,
and my Appropriations Committee staff. Your ability, your decency,
and your fierce loyalty to me are gratefully appreciated. You have
been not just my counselors, but my protectors, and my understanding
friends.

Let me thank those special friends who have helped me get through 25
elections and everything that has happened in between. You know who
you are. By giving me your political and emotional support, you have
sustained me through the pressures and the ups and downs of political
and public life. I will not forget. I hope you feel that your
support helped to make possible whatever good I have done through the
years.

Let me thank Bob Huber, Frank Nikolay, Dick Bolling, and Gaylord
Nelson for teaching me how to be a legislator – in Madison and in
Wisconsin. And let me express a special thanks to Speaker Nancy
Pelosi whose heart, guts, and soul have provided the steel necessary
to accomplish some extraordinary things.

Let me also thank so many of my Congressional colleagues, past and
present, who have worked shoulder to shoulder with me in pursuit of so
many causes – some won, some lost, and who have on occasion forgiven
me for my excessive passion. It has been said that in life our
strength can also be our weakness as I have demonstrated on more than
one occasion.

And let me profoundly thank everyone who has ever cast a vote for me
for the privilege of representing you in Madison and Washington all
these years.

I hope that in whatever years I may have remaining, I will still find
occasion to help move the needle forward. But for now, after 48
years, it is time to pass the torch.

To be a liberal in a conservative era is very frustrating indeed. But guys like him tried to hold the line and they succeeded as often as not. It’s not a very satisfying career, I’m sure. But it was important.

.

Knowing it In My Gut

Knowing It In My Gut

by digby

Yesterday I wrote this post recounting a conversation between Mary Landrieu and John King on CNN in which Landrieu pretty much groveled at the feet of the oil industry and indicated that she had absolutely no intention of calling for any kind of reevaluation of off shore drilling in light of the catastrophic oil spill in the gulf.

This is the extent of my commentary:

Is there a bigger lackey than Mary Landrieu in the congress? I honestly don’t think so. She is facing an environmental devastation of her state’s shoreline and the destruction of its fishing and tourism industries and she was on John King’s show this afternoon defending the oil industry and promoting more offshore drilling:

[INSERT TRANSCRIPT]

Governor Bob Riley of Alabama may have something to say about it. It’s kind of hard to make Louisiana bear the entire risk in case of that one out of a thousand catastrophic oil spill, isn’t it?

[INSERT TRANSCRIPT]

Come on Bob. You can’t just “throw up your hands in hysteria” because of one little massively destructive oil spill. After all it hardly ever happens. Who knows, it might not be so bad. And anyway, the oil companies are really good citizens who have lots of tough regulations already and we need to drill, baby, drill to keep the babies safe and keep the oil companies giving you lots of money for your campaigns. Get your priorities straight.

Landrieu really couldn’t be more bought and paid for. This isn’t your normal “industry vs government” argument. She has a whole bunch of constituents who are going to be ruined by this. And unless Rush and the boys succeed in brainwashing all of them that Obama personally blew up this well for political reasons, they are going to want someone to pay. It sure doesn’t sound like Landrieu’s willing to fight for them on that.

We’ll see. Maybe everyone in the Gulf is philosophical about some multinational corporations buying off their political representatives and ruining their state and way of life.

Landrieu probably shouldn’t count on it though.

This guy, an ostensible fan of mine, writes that I called Louisianans “ignorant hicks” and complains:

See, I live in Austin, and have for almost 10 years. My wife’s family is in Louisiana, and we got there as often as we can. So I kind of have a different perspective than your garden-variety California progressive. And in one of her posts yesterday, digby’s attitude, more than what she said, really kind of rankled. (Fortunately, Mike Madden of Salon had a partial antidote today–thanks, Mike!) digby’s posts often have the subtext (or even the overt text!) of, “If only they would listed to us California Liberals, we’d all be doing so much better.” This time, while she kept it below full-on digby bore, it was still discomfiting.

See, here’s the thing: I’m reasonably sure that digby simply has no idea what life in the Gulf states, and particularly in Louisiana, is like. None. It can’t be explained, it can only be experienced.

My in-laws are from Louisiana. My father-in-law works in the oil bidness for Halliburton. It’s easy for people in California–I was one of them!–to think that Louisianans are clueless, back-country hicks who don’t know what’s good for them. The fact is, though, that it ain’t true…

I think digby (and other non-Southern progressives) know this stuff intellectually, but until you’ve been there, lived there, had relatives working there, you can’t understand it really, not in your gut. And until you do, your opinons are going to sound like those of an arrogant Yankee carpet-bagging liberal who thinks he or she knows what’s best for those dumb, swamp-dwelling, gumbo-eating hicks. Even if that’s not what you’re thinking, that attitude seeps through. Believe me; Sami whacks me often enough over it.

I have enormous respect for digby. Huge. Hers is one of only three or four blogs that I read every day. But when it comes to the oil business, and the people who make their livlihoods from it, I don’t think you really understand. So kvetch about Landrieu all you want–Lord knows she deserves it. But bear in mind that there’s far worse out there than her. Louisianans know. They know, because they’ve lived through them.

Just something to think about.

Consider me schooled.

Except I lived a good part of my childhood in Bay St Louis, Mississippi and spent more than a decade in Alaska. I helped build the fucking Alaska Pipeline. I worked for pipeline service companies like Fluor and Bechtel etc. in my youth and both my father and my brother were/are in or affiliated with the oil business, stationed everywhere from Saudi to Thailand to Texas to Norway. Many of my closest friends worked on the clean-up of the Exxon Valdez spill. Soooo, I actually do know quite a bit about the south and the oil business — in my gut.

But, you know, I don’t think a person has to give their resume or life story to be allowed to have an opinion about such things. Everyone has a right to weigh in on these matters of public concern regardless of their personal experience or where they live. I’ve never been to Iraq, but I write about the war. And I’ve never lived in new York, but I certainly opine every day about what goes on on Wall Street. The fact is that the Gulf belongs to everyone and we all have a right to be concerned about what’s going on there. It’s a disaster with global implications.

Just to be clear, I don’t blame the people of Louisiana for wanting good paying jobs in the oil industry. I never wrote or even thought such a thing. In fact, I know dozens of people who do the same, even members of my own family. But I saw the devastation to the Alaskan fishing, tourism and wildlife economy after the Valdez spill so I do feel very sorry for those who make their living on a body of water that is now a disgusting oil slick. I feel horrified by the environmental damage, the wildlife, the whole ugly mess.

Does that really make me an “arrogant Yankee carpet-bagging liberal who thinks he or she knows what’s best for those dumb, swamp-dwelling, gumbo-eating hicks?” Really? I assume that like people everywhere, Louisianans value their home and their way of life and would expect the industries doing business there to do everything possible to make sure that way of life is protected. (How about the poor roughnecks on that oil rig who got blown up. Can we spare a couple of moments to feel bad about that at least?)

But in that interview Mary Landrieu couldn’t seem to summon up much sympathy or concern for anyone but British Petroleum. She comes from a long standing Louisiana political family, to be sure, and I don’t doubt that people are fond of her there. But she isn’t some good ole girl in the colorful tradition of Huey Long or even Edwin Edwards. She’s a wealthy, powerful international elite who is protecting the people she works for. And believe me that isn’t the people of Louisiana. Whatever bacon she brings home is leftovers.

I still honestly don’t know how this person read all this contempt for the people of Louisiana into my post. But if it’s because I think that politicians like Mary Landrieu are corrupt swine, that these unaccountable oil companies are rapacious blights on the planet, that the Gulf of Mexico is a glorious natural treasure that should be protected along with the people who make a living on it and its shores — well then I guess it’s fine to call me an arrogant California liberal bigot if that’s how you define such things. After all, bigotry is in the eye of the beholder — people know it when they see it. I know I do.

.

Killer Drones

Killer Drones

by digby

So the Times Square bomber comes from an elite Pakistani family and was upset by the drone attacks. The first is interesting because it flies in the face of the common assumption that these guys are all messed up lower class kids who would never go this way if they only had Best Buy and porn at their disposal. This incident and the similar class identity of the Christmas bomber speaks to something quite different going on. We might want to start looking beyond our facile “they hate us for our freedom” (and money) explanation.

The fact that he’s upset about the drone attacks is especially interesting considering this story from 1989 that’s up on Michael Moore’s site today, ‘quoting the suspects Dad, a high level Pakistani military officer. He complains about attacks coming from Afghanistan under the Russian occupation in the same area. Strange how these things seem to all come back to the same thing, doesn’t it? Plus ca change yadda, yadda, yadda.

And it also points out just how dumb it was for Obama to be making jokes about those drone attacks on national TV at that stupid White House Correspondence Dinner. I’m not saying anyone should be censored But he is the president, innocent people are dying in those attacks and it’s causing a huge amount of unrest in Pakistan. It wasn’t that funny and certainly wasn’t political satire or some kind of important blow for free speech. All presidents should probably make it a rule not to yuk it up over WMD and air attacks. It’s unnecessary.

.