Skip to content

Month: June 2011

Tweaking the lizard brain

Tweaking the lizard brain

by digby

I don’t think it can get any more offensive than this, but I’m sure they’ll be trying hard to top it over the next year and a half:

TPM reports:

The spot is produced by Ladd Ehlinger, Jr., best known for his wildly popular Dale “Don’t Give A Rip” Peterson campaign video in the 2010 race for Alabama secretary of agriculture. Turn Right USA, the sponsor, is a brand new political action committee which only filed its paperwork with the Federal Election Commission on Monday. The paperwork indicates that Turn Right USA intends to operate as a so-called “super PAC,” capable of raising funds in unlimited amount, but will not use those funds to directly support federal candidates or committees. Claude Todoroff serves as treasurer for the group, which is based in Gardena, Calif. G. Rick Marshall serves as the group’s designated agent.

I’m fairly sure Todoroff this guy, but it would be a fair guess that he’s not the brains or cash behind the group.

This ad is designed to create controversy, of course, and will succeed in doing that. But there’s a reason for it beyond just pissing off liberals. These kinds of ads are also designed to ooze certain primal impulses into the atmosphere. I would guess a lot of right wingers are going to enjoy it. It speaks directly to their lizard brains. And it reinforces certain tribal bonds, which seems to be this ad maker’s specialty.

.

The owners lay down the law: raise the debt ceiling or “we’ll get rid of you.”

Who could have ever predicted …

by digby

… that when the Chamber of Commerce president Thomas Donohue was asked if Congress was going to raise the debt ceiling, he would say:

Yes, it will be raised, Donohue answered, mainly because the country can not afford to not pay its bills. To those newly-elected representatives who say they aren’t going to raise the debt ceiling and will shut down government, Donohue said the U.S. Chamber has its own message: “We’ll get rid of you.”

He then went on to praise U.S. House Speaker John Boehner for his Congressional leadership.

“He’s growing into his shorts,” Donohue said. “He’s put on his big boy pants.”

The Big Money Boyz were never going to let the tea party muck around with things they consider to be above their pay grade. (In that respect, democracy itself is the big kabuki game.) I’m sure they’ve sent the same message to the Democrats who are dutifully putting on their “big boy pants” too and it’s very likely that Obama will get a nice, tidy bipartisan vote on the debt ceiling.

Brad DeLong thinks this means they will also get a clean vote which would actually be the best possible outcome and I fervently hope that’s what happens. But if I had to guess, I’d say that both sides will get what they wanted out of these “negotiations.” The Republicans wanted cuts, we know that. What the Democrats wanted out of this remains a mystery. But seeing as this raising of the debt limit has always been a foregone conclusion, we’ll know what it is when we see the “deal.”

The Big Money Boyz just freed the hostages.

.

The soft bigotry of low expectations

The soft bigotry of low expectations

by digby

Like Ed Kilgore, I’ve been a little discombobulated by the reviews of the GOP debate last night which hold that it was such a nice surprise to see that the field isn’t crazy after all. According to who?

Ed cites this piece by Jake Weisberg and notes:

In other words, the candidates did not howl at the moon, and did not go out of the way to associate themselves with a dangerously specific and unpopular Medicare proposal.

They did, however, with the exception of Herman Cain’s brief endorsement of food safety inspections, uniformly reject any positive government role in domestic affairs, and more specifically, any legitimate government role in the economy, other than keeping money tight and getting rid of its own regulations. If anyone thought government could do anything at all to help the unemployed other than give more tax dollars and power to the people who had laid them off and/or foreclosed on their mortgages, they kept it to themselves. They engaged in an orgy of angry union-bashing that was entirely unlike anything that’s ever happened in a debate among people running for president. And the sort of reticence Weisberg perceived on cultural issues basically meant that candidates who favor criminalization of abortion and re-stigmatization of gay people say they won’t make it a major campaign issue. And why should they? They all agree on these extremist positions.

I guess they expected them all to wear tri-corner hats and start screaming about birth certificates and when they didn’t, their ideological lunacy suddenly seems to be “moderate.” What a racket.

Kilgore attributes this to the fact that the Republicans are now unified around ideological lunacy and so have calmed down. And that’s a very creepy thought:

When the political center of a party, or a country, is in the process of shifting, there’s a lot of noise and conflict. When it settles in its new place, however, it gets very quiet. To a very great extent, that’s what has happened in the GOP. It is not a sign of “sanity” or “moderation;” simply one of consensus.

Michelle Bachman is an extremist and a dumb one at that. But she is also a professional politician, unlike the grifter Palin to whom she is often compared and who literally cannot communicate clearly at all. So yes, she came across as lucid last night, which surprised people. (Newt, on the other hand, gave Palin a run for her money in the word salad department.)

But make no mistake, all of them are extremists, even the vaunted “moderate” Mitt, who, if he wins will be at the total mercy of the wing nuts in the congress. These people are waaaay outside what we considered to be the mainstream of the GOP just a few years ago. The reason they seem calm is that the fight over that is over.

And according the Village rules, that makes Ben Nelson a leftist. Hell, that makes Orrin Hatch a leftist.

.

Chart ‘o the day: workers’ share of national income

Chart ‘O The Day

by digby

Workers’ share of U.S, national income is collapsing:

David Frum asks:

Two questions for the Republican presidential candidates:

1) Is this a problem?

2) If yes, what can be done about it?

I’d want to ask the Democratic presidential candidate he same thing.But I’m sure that the Republicans will all say it’s not rally a problem but that to the extent it is, we only need to drastically cut entitlements and lower taxes on the “producers” and all will be well. When have they ever said anything else in the last 30 years?

This is a tough question, however, for those who might truly want to solve the problem. And unfortunately, in the age of Citizens United, the political incentives are all going the wrong way as well. Wealth concentration makes the system lean ever further in that direction.

That’s a very scary chart for a country that has long had a pretty stable society and a thriving middle class. Even in the gilded age there was still something of a frontier and vast entrepreneurial opportunity. I don’t know where this ends up.

.

What will we tell the children? : Tea Party Reeducation Camp

What will we tell the children?

by digby

Camp!

TAMPA – Here’s another option now that the kids are out of school: a weeklong seminar about our nation’s founding principles, courtesy of the Tampa 912 Project.

The organization, which falls under the tea party umbrella, hopes to introduce kids ages 8 to 12 to principles that include “America is good,” “I believe in God,” and “I work hard for what I have and I will share it with who I want to. Government cannot force me to be charitable.”

Organized by conservative writer Jeff Lukens and staffed by volunteers from the 912 Project, Tampa Liberty School will meet every morning July 11-15 in borrowed space at the Paideia Christian school in Temple Terrace.

“We want to impart to our children what our nation is about, and what they may or may not be told,” Lukens said.

He said he was not familiar with public school curriculum, but, “I do know they have a lot of political correctness. We are a faithful people, and when you talk about natural law, you have to talk about God. When you take that out of the discussion, you miss the whole thing.”

Lest you think it’s all about God, God, God all day, they’ve got tons of really fun activities for the kiddies planned:

One example at Liberty: Children will win hard, wrapped candies to use as currency for a store, symbolizing the gold standard. On the second day, the “banker” will issue paper money instead. Over time, students will realize their paper money buys less and less, while the candies retain their value.

“Some of the kids will fall for it,” Lukens said. “Others kids will wise up.”

Another example: Starting in an austere room where they are made to sit quietly, symbolizing Europe, the children will pass through an obstacle course to arrive at a brightly decorated party room (the New World).

Red-white-and-blue confetti will be thrown. But afterward the kids will have to clean up the confetti, learning that with freedom comes responsibility.

Still another example: Children will blow bubbles from a single container of soapy solution, and then pop each other’s bubbles with squirt guns in an arrangement that mimics socialism. They are to count how many bubbles they pop. Then they will work with individual bottles of solution and pop their own bubbles.

“What they will find out is that you can do a lot more with individual freedom,” Lukens said.

These people are raising their kids to be insufferable, proselytizing Ayn Rand adolescents or black-clad teen-age loners who love Death Metal and hate their parents. (The latter have a far better chance of becoming productive human beings.)

But doesn’t anyone see the irony of indoctrination into individualism? Bueller?

h/t to @tarkloon
.

Pietism in the face

Pietism in the face

by digby

Oh God. Get ready for some lugubrious sanctimony like you’ve never seen before from the the Republicans. I don’t know whether or not I can take it:

Here’s another example from the noted empathetic altruist Rich Lowry:

Pres. Barack Obama is given to cute vehicular metaphors about the state of the economy. We were “in a ditch,” then got out and hit a “bump in the road.” This is studiously folksy. It also vastly understates the nature of our situation.

President Obama is presiding over an unspooling social catastrophe in the form of unemployment, and especially long-term unemployment. For all those people who are chronically unemployed, it’s as if they have been hit by the proverbial car and then backed over by it again and again.

Now many liberals are going to immediately roll their eyes and proclaim such over-the-top sentiment to be absurd. (And coming from Romney the job killer, it is). But it would be a mistake to underestimate the power of this message and if Romlenty can successfully persuade people that they feel their pain and will offer solutions, it will make a race.

As Dave Johnson wrote today:

In the middle of the worst job crisis since the Depression many Democrats forgot about jobs and got all in a tizzy about cutting budgets. All the usual suspects made a lot of noise about deficit reduction, and the cocktail-party and dinner-party circuits all knowingly nodded and told each other they were so smart, they could see that these entitlements were killing the country, these deficits were killing the country, these entitlements were killing the country… So in the DC bubble many Democrats forgot about who and where those deficits came from (tax cuts, military spending and an economic crash caused by deregulation), and got caught up instead worrying about how to cut budgets. And now, wham, the trap is sprung, Republicans are campaigning on how Democrats didn’t provide jobs.

GOP strategist Alex Castellanos telegraphed this last fall:

ALEX CASTELLANOS, CNN POLITICAL ANALYST: Priority No. 1 for the Republicans is going to be an agenda for jobs and growth, and that’s what they’re going to try to put, I think, on the table.

BLITZER: Does that mean repealing the health-care law?

CASTELLANOS: I think the health-care law is going to be part of that, but it’s not going to be, I think, what you see on day one. We don’t want to fall in the same traps, I think, the Democrats did, which is they spent the year they should have been talking about the economy talking about health care. We don’t want to flip that problem on its head.

Johnson sees the release of the Ryan plan as a trap and maybe they were that smart. But I doubt it. They just got lucky with unemployment taking a turn for the worse and the administration’s fumbling. But there’s no doubt it gives them a weapon to hit the President over the head with, something that would be far less potent if the White House had stayed focused on the economy directly instead of the abstract nonsense about deficits. They are the ones who had the most to lose politically if the economy went south, after all.

The sad fact is that the President has not conveyed a sense that he cares passionately about the problem of unemployment and very, very foolishly bought into the finance boys’ advice that the key to economic success was in the hands of the bond vigilantes and confidence fairies. The “recovery summer” stuff last year was hubristic in the extreme and they are now heading into the election having to face this dolorous bullshit from people we know can’t wait to enact politics that will make things even worse. And the way the pendulum has been swinging I wouldn’t count on it not working. They need to get their act together quickly or this may not be the cakewalk that I and everyone else have assumed it was going to be.

.

Outreach: Kabuki with Big Money Boyz is sadly inevitable, but there’s no point in trying to appease the rightwing. Really.

Outreach

by digby

The NY Times reports today that the administration has been wining and dining Wall Street for the 2012 campaign. They report that he will have some serious fence mending to do before they will be forgiven for hurting their precious feelings by calling them fat cats:

[E]ven as some criticize the president for listening too closely, they say, to Wall Street on issues like the 2008 bailout and financial regulation, he has suffered some unusually public defections and criticism by some former Wall Street supporters, who view his policies and rhetoric as unfair to their industry. Many are Republicans whose support last time around burnished his image as a post-partisan problem solver.

Right. The financial industry has really had a tough time under Obama’s policies.

Seeing that the campaign is going to need a hundred billion, nobody can be surprised that they are are begging the Big Money Boyz to cough up. The playing to the refs on the name calling was necessary to give cover for the friendly policies that produced that nice chart above. They are all playing their tiresome roles.

But this is just stupid and gratuitous bad politics:

Newsmax met with President Barack Obama and his senior advisers at a special White House Summit to discuss a wide range of serious economic issues facing the United States and the world.

In a first for the administration, the White House brought together 22 of the country’s leading online media — including Newsmax, Forbes, The Economist, Kiplinger, MSN, Yahoo, and AOL/Huffington Post — to create a platform to better communicate the administration’s economic message.

Newsmax Editorial Director Steve Coz and Newsmax magazine Editor in Chief Ken Chandler attended the summit Wednesday and spoke with Obama and his advisers.

Newsmax is a hardcore Republican publication. They might as well have invited Fox or NRO. But I guess hope springs eternal that by being nice to the Republican establishment everyone will love them. It’s just sad at this point.

h/t to RP

.

Coupla billion here and coupla billion there and pretty soon you’re talking about real money

A couple of billion here and a couple of billion there …

by digby

From the “we can’t afford to pay for schools and firefighters file”

A leaked Pentagon memo has revealed the cost of the U.S. military involvement in Libya is soaring and is set to soon exceed the Pentagon’s initial estimate of $750 million. In other Libya news, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is examining whether Goldman Sachs and some other financial companies violated bribery laws in dealings with Libya’s sovereign-wealth fund.

But hey, that’s nothing! We spent trillions on Iraq and Afghanistan. This is a bargain. In fact, we spent so much that we can’t even account for many billions of dollars.

You all remember the missing billions in Iraq, right? I wrote about it a lot at the time it was revealed. This post from 2005 discussed it in detail and talked about why it happened:

Too bad we can’t lay our hands on the 8 Billion Dollars of the Iraqis own money that went missing under Paul Bremer’s Coalition provisional Government.

When Paul Bremer, the American pro consul in Baghdad until June last year, arrived in Iraq soon after the official end of hostilities, there was $6bn left over from the UN Oil for Food Programme, as well as sequestered and frozen assets, and at least $10bn from resumed Iraqi oil exports. Under Security Council Resolution 1483, passed on May 22 2003, all these funds were transferred into a new account held at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, called the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI), and intended to be spent by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) “in a transparent manner … for the benefit of the Iraqi people”.

The US Congress also voted to spend $18.4bn of US taxpayers’ money on the redevelopment of Iraq. By June 28 last year, however, when Bremer left Baghdad two days early to avoid possible attack on the way to the airport, his CPA had spent up to $20bn of Iraqi money, compared with $300m of US funds. The “reconstruction” of Iraq is the largest American-led occupation programme since the Marshall Plan – but the US government funded the Marshall Plan. Defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Bremer have made sure that the reconstruction of Iraq is paid for by the “liberated” country, by the Iraqis themselves.

The CPA maintained one fund of nearly $600m cash for which there is no paperwork: $200m of it was kept in a room in one of Saddam’s former palaces. The US soldier in charge used to keep the key to the room in his backpack, which he left on his desk when he popped out for lunch. Again, this is Iraqi money, not US funds…

The auditors have so far referred more than a hundred contracts, involving billions of dollars paid to American personnel and corporations, for investigation and possible criminal prosecution. They have also discovered that $8.8bn that passed through the new Iraqi government ministries in Baghdad while Bremer was in charge is unaccounted for, with little prospect of finding out where it has gone. A further $3.4bn appropriated by Congress for Iraqi development has since been siphoned off to finance “security”.

[…]

Lack of accountability does not stop with the Americans. In January this year, the Sigir issued a report detailing evidence of fraud, corruption and waste by the Iraqi Interim Government when Bremer was in charge. They found that $8.8bn – the entire Iraqi Interim Government spending from October 2003 through June 2004 – was not properly accounted for. The Iraqi Office of Budget and Management at one point had only six staff, all of them inexperienced, and most of the ministries had no budget departments. Iraq’s newly appointed ministers and their senior officials were free to hand out hundreds of millions of dollars in cash as they pleased, while American “advisers” looked on.

“CPA personnel did not review and compare financial, budgetary and operational performance to planned or expected results,” the auditors explained. One ministry gave out $430m in contracts without its CPA advisers seeing any of the paperwork. Another claimed to be paying 8,206 guards, but only 602 could be found. There is simply no way of knowing how much of the $8.8bn has gone to pay for private militias and into private pockets.

“It’s remarkable that the inspector general’s office could have produced even a draft report with so many misconceptions and inaccuracies,” Bremer said in his reply to the Sigir report. “At liberation, the Iraqi economy was dead in the water. So CPA’s top priority was to get the economy going.”

The Sigir has responded by releasing another audit this April, an investigation into the way Bremer’s CPA managed cash payments from Iraqi funds in just one part of Iraq, the region around Hillah: “During the course of the audit, we identified deficiencies in the control of cash … of such magnitude as to require prompt attention. Those deficiencies were so significant that we were precluded from accomplishing our stated objectives.” They found that CPA headquarters in Baghdad “did not maintain full control and accountability for approximately $119.9m”, and that agents in the field “cannot properly account for or support over $96.6m in cash and receipts”. The agents were mostly Americans in Iraq on short-term contracts. One agent’s account balance was “overstated by $2,825,755, and the error went undetected”. Another agent was given $25m cash for which Bremer’s office “acknowledged not having any supporting documentation”. Of more than $23m given to another agent, there are only records for $6,306,836 paid to contractors.

Many of the American agents submitted their paperwork only hours before they headed to the airport. Two left Iraq without accounting for $750,000 each, which has never been found. CPA head office cleared several agents’ balances of between $250,000 and $12m without any receipts. One agent who did submit receipts, on being told that he still owed $1,878,870, turned up three days later with exactly that amount. The auditors thought that “this suggests that the agent had a reserve of cash”, pointing out that if his original figures had been correct, he would have accounted to the CPA for approximately $3.8m more than he had been given in the first place, which “suggests that the receipt documents provided to the DFI account manager were unreliable”.

The CPA was a very special boondoggle, if you’ll recall. It was an experiment in Republican Party governance. They refused to allow anyone on “the team” who didn’t pass the GOP litmus test. They would not hire experts nor would they allow foreign or domestic political actors who were not deemed sufficiently loyal to Bush to help with planning and implementation. So much so that they were finally reduced to hiring kids who had posted resumes on the Heritage Foundation web-site in order to ensure ideological purity. If I recall correctly, Ari Fleischer’s brother was put in charge of setting up the new Iraqi stock market despite the fact that he knew absolutely zero about stock markets. But he had the right contacts, that’s for sure.

And, let’s not forget that all this happened because we were in such a hurry to “disarm” Iraq that we couldn’t take even a minute to think through how we might re-start their economy and rebuild their infrastructure in a planned and rational way. We just invaded come hell or high water and then sent in a bunch of college Republicans with planeloads of cash. This is one of the aspects of the DSM’s that hasn’t yet been properly discussed. The minutes make clear that it wasn’t that our plans just didn’t forsee the particular problems we encountered. We didn’t plan for the post war period at all.

This is a huge story for someone to truly unravel although I think it will probably take a novelist or a filmmaker to do it justice. The grand Neocon experiment turns out to be a corrupt boondoggle of unprecedented, epic proportions. Perhaps that plot is just too predictable to sell… I can tell you one thing, though: I don’t want to hear one more goddamned self-righteous word from any Republican about the “Oil For Food” scandal. Not one.

The story was told in a great book called Imperial Life in the Emerald City. But until they turn it into a Broadway musical or a film by Bunuel, I don’t think anyone’s ever going to get the true, surrealistic feel for what happened.

The LA Times reports today on the results of the latest audit. Guess what?

This month, the Pentagon and the Iraqi government are finally closing the books on the program that handled all those Benjamins. But despite years of audits and investigations, U.S. Defense officials still cannot say what happened to $6.6 billion in cash — enough to run the Los Angeles Unified School District or the Chicago Public Schools for a year, among many other things.

For the first time, federal auditors are suggesting that some or all of the cash may have been stolen, not just mislaid in an accounting error. Stuart Bowen, special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, an office created by Congress, said the missing $6.6 billion may be “the largest theft of funds in national history.”

The mystery is a growing embarrassment to the Pentagon, and an irritant to Washington’s relations with Baghdad. Iraqi officials are threatening to go to court to reclaim the money, which came from Iraqi oil sales, seized Iraqi assets and surplus funds from the United Nations’ oil-for-food program…

Pentagon officials have contended for the last six years that they could account for the money if given enough time to track down the records. But repeated attempts to find the documentation, or better yet the cash, were fruitless.

I suspect the Iraqis will be told to take a hike on their request for compensation. In fact, last week Congressman Dana Rohrabacher went even further than that:

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher spoke during a one-day visit by a group of six U.S. congressman. The California Republican said he raised the suggestion during a meeting with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki that some day when Iraq is a “prosperous” nation it pay back the U.S. for everything that it has done here.

“We would hope that some consideration be given to repaying the United States some of the megadollars we have spent here in the last eight years,” Rohrabacher told reporters at the U.S. Embassy after the meeting.

You can’t say he doesn’t have chutzpah.

By the way, he also expects the Libyans to ante up so that’s good.

They used to call this plundering and pillaging, but since we are Exceptional we send an invoice for the invasion and demand a thank you note.

.

Are you ready for another Texas theocrat?

Are you ready for another Texas theocrat?

by digby

It’s looking more and more as if the GOP field will end up being Romney vs Perry with a bunch of other clowns falling our of a clown car. (Perry may not get in, but he probably should. He will end up making Romney look much saner by comparison and it Mitt pulls off the nomination potentially lure some of the vaunted Independents to the GOP.)

Anyway, here’s just one little anecdote about Perry, who truly is as thick as Palin and as extreme as Bachman. (But the press is going to be dazzled by him and will give him a lot more room to be idiotic.)

During an appearance on James Robison’s Life Today television program, Perry says he sees a silver lining to the devastating recession that has cost millions of families their jobs, homes, and livelihoods: it will return America to “Biblical principles” and free us from the slavery of big government:

PERRY: I think in America from time to time we have to go through some difficult times — and I think we’re going through those difficult economic times for a purpose, to bring us back to those Biblical principles of you know, you don’t spend all the money. You work hard for those six years and you put up that seventh year in the warehouse to take you through the hard times. And not spending all of our money. Not asking for Pharaoh to give everything to everybody and to take care of folks because at the end of the day, it’s slavery. We become slaves to government.

So the Great Recession is God’s will. Hallelujah and pass the tax cuts.

Perry’s wingnut credentials are unparalleled. He called for secession. He’s a Tenther. But this is probably the most important validating signal:

Another politician joins forces with the apostles. Texas Governor Rick Perry is leading an event in Houston on August 6 with the “apostolic and prophetic” movement, including leaders from Lou Engle’s “The Call,” Mike Bickle’s International House of Prayer, and the American Family Association. The Call is a virulently anti-gay and anti-abortion event held in stadiums and large venues, including one in Uganda that featured speakers promoting the “Kill the Gays” bill. The International House of Prayer (IHOP) is a growing worldwide movement led by Bickle, leader of a Kansas City-based 24/7 prayer in an effort to raise up a generation of young end time warriors. Part of the IHOP’s agenda is the “Israel Mandate” to proselytize Jews in order to advance the end times.

The event in Houston on August 6 is advertised as The Response: A Call to Prayer for a Nation in Crisis and the organizers include: Luis and Jill Cataldo, on the staff of IHOP in Kansas City; Randy and Kelsey Bohlender with IHOP and The Call; Apostle Doug Stringer; Dave Silker of IHOP; leaders of the American Family Association; Jim Garlow, who headed the campaign for Proposition Eight and heads Newt Ginrich’s Renewing American Leadership; and several other Religious Right activists.Rick Perry’s partnership with the apostles and prophets just prior to his possible announcement of a run for president, would appear to give credence to the warnings of several contributors to Talk2action about the growing political power of the New Apostolic “prayer warrior” networks. The New Apostolic Reformation is where the anti-gay, anti-abortion, and Christian Zionist networks converge with an aggressive form of Christian “dominionism,” or the belief that Christians must take control over society and government.This network began as part of the campaign in the 1980s and 1990s to evangelize the world prior to the year 2000. One of the major leaders of this mission effort was C. Peter Wagner, [Video] a thirty-year professor of church growth at Fuller Theological Seminary. He left that position to continue these efforts under the banner of the New Apostolic Reformation, moving to Colorado Springs to work with Ted Haggard to develop the World Prayer Center. Haggard wrote that that in 1999 their outreach included 40,000,000 participants worldwide. Since that time, leading Apostles Dutch Sheets, Chuck Pierce, Cindy Jacobs, and others, have developed a fifty-state communications and mobilization network of “prayer warriors.” Under the leadership of Apostle Ed Silvoso, head of the International Transformation Network, the prayer warrior networks in some American cities are now divided into precincts, with one person assigned specifically to each street – a political organizers dream.Politicians competing for the support of this prayer warrior network prior to the presidential primaries include Sarah Palin, who has an over twenty-year relationship with Alaskan Apostle Mary Glazier; Newt Gingrich, who was anointed by Lou Engleon an internationally televised broadcast in 2009; Michelle Bachman, Rick Santorum, and now, apparently, Rick Perry.

Read Rachel Tabachnick’s entire article for the extreme creepiness of this group, particularly its stand on Israel, which is literally apocalyptic. Rick Perry isn’t just dogwhistling these people, he’s standing there with pounds of raw red meat in his hands.

He’s dumb as a post about nearly everything — think Bush Junior without the pedigree and DC experience and better hair. But he’s a virulent wingnut of the theocratic variety who could con the lazy press corps with his November 2010 message of a “Texas miracle” (which like Bush’s before him will have already fallen apart but nobody will report it.) I think they run for president in their 6th year to make their escape.

As I said, the greatest threat here is probably in making Romney look like a reasonable alternative to normal people (if the economy is still in terrible shape in November 2012.) But he might be able to pull it off too — you never know what could happen. And we can’t afford to have this man as president.

.