Skip to content

Month: June 2012

Onward Christian Flyboys

Onward Christian Flyboys

by digby

This is the very definition of chutzpah:

More than 60 Republican lawmakers have signed a letter to U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta accusing the U.S. Air Force of being “hostile to religion,” according to Fox News.

The letter, drafted by Reps. Todd Akin (R-MO), Diane Black (R-TN) and Randy Forbes (R-VA), calls on Panetta to investigate a series of cases where the Air Force “succumbed” to pressure from outside groups, such as the removal of a paragraph from a Squadron Officer School training document saying, “if you attend chapel regularly, both officers and Airmen are likely to follow this example. If you are morally lax in your personal life, a general moral indifference within the command can be expected.”

The document was taken out following a complaint by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation that the line “creates the inescapable impression that regular church attendance is a requirement for commissioned Air Force officers in order to demonstrate positive morals to subordinates.” The foundation said it violates the constitutional ban on religious tests for U.S. office holders.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation was created because the US Air Force was becoming a fundamentalist Christian cult. I’m surprised it’s taken them this long to start a full-blown pushback.

.

A week’s worth of Krugman

A week’s worth of Krugman

by digby

Lot’s of great stuff coming from Paul Krugman at various venues. Obviously, his homebase at the NY Times, but also PBS, which featured a week long series of interviews with Paul Solomon, including this one:

Watch Paul Krugman on the ‘Cartoon Physics’ of the 2008 Crash on PBS. See more from PBS NewsHour.

Also:

Krugman on European austerity, with a response from Jacob Kirekegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics: Paul Krugman on Germany’s ‘Whips and Scourges’

Krugman focused on Spain and Germany with critique from Terence Burnham: Paul Krugman on Europe ‘Doing the Unthinkable’

Krugman on his former boss, Ben Bernanke: Paul Krugman on Ben Bernanke’s ‘Green Shoots’

And this one with economist Robin Wells, Krugman’s wife and writing partner:

Finally, here’s Krugman and Wells in the NYRB reviewing The Escape Artists: How Obama’s Team Fumbled the Recovery by Noam Scheiber, Pity the Billionaire: The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right by Thomas Frank and The Age of Austerity: How Scarcity Will Remake American Politics by Thomas Byrne Edsall.

And excerpt:

If Geithner is the active designer of the Wall Street bailout, Obama is the passive enabler of Republican intransigence. Scheiber describes how, time and time again, Obama’s reflexive search for bipartisanship handed the advantage to the Republicans. Scheiber observes that “in Obama’s mind, ‘partisan’ equaled ‘parochial,’ or even ‘corrupt,’” leading to “making huge concessions before the [stimulus] negotiation had even started,” that Obama’s hunger for acceptance through bipartisanship was “deeply confused,” and, perhaps most damningly, that in contrast to Obama’s approach, “partisan muscle-flexing may very well serve the public interest, since there’s no other way to pass legislation.”

Obama’s innate centrism led him to adopt the preoccupation with the budget deficit of Geithner and Peter Orszag (his head of the Office of Management and Budget and another Rubin protégé) in opposition to vocal protests from both Summers and Romer that now was not the time to worry about deficits. As a result, Obama would never acknowledge that the original stimulus was not big enough, a position that left him boxed in when it became clear—as it already had by summer of 2010, if not earlier—that it had indeed been far too small.

An old story, told many times before by some of us, including Krugman, while it was happening. Again, I come back to the “believed their own hype” theory, in which it was supposed that Obama had an unnatural ability to bring Republicans on board. And as it turned out he actually had the effect of making them more intransigent.

There’s a lot in this to chew over, all of it worthwhile.

.

Issa goes down the rabbit hole

Issa goes down the rabbit hole

by digby

The other day I wondered when the right wingers had stopped believing that “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” and I mentioned that not even Darrel Issa could believe the silly conspiracy theory they’ve contrived around “Fast and Furious” to explain their sudden concern with guns getting into the hands of the wrong people.

I was wrong:

This morning on “This Week,” Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., continued pressing a conspiracy theory that the botched “Fast and Furious” operation could have been part of a larger plan by the Obama administration to push through tougher gun laws in the United States. But Issa had no firm evidence to back the claim, and said he could not be certain that gun control efforts were ever an original aim of sending guns across the border.

Face it. It’s all they’ve got. Otherwise, they’re turning tripping all over their own contradictions. After all, normally they would have been defending the gun sellers who sold the guns and criticizing the government for interfering with their constitutional right to bear arms. (Surely they’re not saying that government should have stopped these gun sales?)

No, they have to weave some completely ludicrous narrative to explain why they are suddenly concerned with guns getting into the hands of criminals and killing law enforcement officers and this is the best they can do.

.

I envy us. @Chrislhayes is coming to LA to chat w/@theharryshearer and drink liberally.

Chris Hayes coming to LA to drink with liberals and talk with Harry Shearer

by digby

I don’t often embed bloggingheads talks on the blog because I figure that most of you who are into that sort of thing already watch them. I’m publishing this one between Mike Konczal and Chris Hayes because it’s particularly good and because Chris is coming to LA tomorrow where he will be speaking at the Writer’s Guild Theatre with Harry Shearer at 7:30 (reservations required) and then hanging out at Drinking Liberally in Santa Monica around 9:30 or so.

I watched his talk at the New School when it was livestreamed and it was fascinating. (This one should be especially fun because it’s with Derek Smalls.) Chris will already be punch drunk from jet lag and new dad sleep deprivation so who knows what hilarity will ensue at Drinking Liberally? See you there!

.

A friendly reminder for Sunday morning, by @DavidOAtkins

A friendly reminder for Sunday morning

by David Atkins

Just a friendly reminder on Sunday morning: next time your wingnut uncle or brother-in-law talks about the government’s “out-of-control and irresponsible spending,” remind him that it was just ten years ago that after eight years of Democratic governance, the federal government supposedly had too much money. Some of us had suggested using some of that money for a Social Security “lockbox” for a rainy day, and were roundly mocked for it. Others had insisted to thunderous applause that we instead give a bunch of tax cuts mostly to rich people in a profligate orgy of government giveaways to the nation’s wealthiest people.

Amusingly enough, they called the second group of people “conservatives.” They got their way. Two mostly pointless wars, a drowned city and a deregulation-fueled economic collapse later, and the rest is history.

Also, there’s this:

Don’t play nice, and don’t back down. The last ten years of “conservative” governing philosophy has been such a reckless disaster that each and every one of us must make constant reminders of it to a forgetful public, lest the memory hole swallow it all forever. The “journalistic” profession certainly won’t do it on our behalf. It’s up to each and every one of us to do it, one person at a time.

.

Saturday Night at the Movies: Strange bedfellows — “Grassroots” and “True Wolf”

Saturday Night at the Movies

Strange bedfellows: Grassroots and True Wolf

By Dennis Hartley














Seattle politician in natural habitat: Grassroots

There aren’t too many political biopics I can think of offhand that open with the candidate-to-be dressed in a bear suit and screaming at traffic. But then again, there aren’t many cities I have lived in that have a political climate quite like Seattle. I’ve never forgotten what a standup comic pal (and long-time resident) told me when I first moved here 20 years ago. “Don’t let anybody bullshit you about how ‘hip’ and ‘metropolitan’ this town is,” he advised, “…Because it will always be Mayberry with a Space Needle.”

A case in point would be the brief but colorful political career of Grant Cogswell, which has provided fodder for a film from director Stephen Gyellenhaal (yes, the well-known acting siblings are his progeny). Cogswell (Joel David Moore) was an unemployed music critic (a polite term for “slacker”) with no prior political experience, who made a run for a city council seat back in 2001. His unconventional grassroots campaign was managed (“babysat” might be more a more apt description) by his friend and fellow political neophyte Phil Campbell (Jason Biggs). The film opens with Campbell getting fired from his gig writing for The Stranger (Seattle’s long-running alt-weekly hipster rag). “You can’t get any lower (than getting fired from The Stranger),” a self-pitying Campbell whines to his live-in girlfriend (Lauren Ambrose). What’s he to do with all his time now?

The answer soon arrives when he is roped (against his better judgment) into joining his eccentric pal Grant on a quest to unseat incumbent councilman Richard McIver (Cedric the Entertainer). Cogswell sees McIver as the quintessential self serving politician who is in bed with the Big Money Boys; in this case emptying the city coffers for an ambitious and expensive light rail project, when the answer to Seattle’s traffic congestion has been sitting right there in front of everybody since the 1962 World’s Fair: the monorail. Why not expand this cheaper, green-friendly “…super-ass modern transportation system”? Launching his campaign armed with this “electro-strategy” (and little else)…they’re off.

While hardcore political junkies may take umbrage that Gyllenhaal’s screenplay (co-written with Justin Rhodes and based on Campbell’s campaign memoir Zioncheck for President) takes a broad approach by favoring the kookier elements of the story, I think most viewers will find his film quite engaging. The cast’s energy and enthusiasm is palpable, and whilst Gyllenhaal’s film lacks the verbal agility and pacing of, say, The Great Mcginty (particularly with lines like “Politics, bitches!”), he seems to be channeling Preston Sturges at times. I think it was wise for Gyllenhaal to eschew the political minutiae; otherwise he may have ended up with something of little interest to anyone besides Seattleites. In fact, the best thing about this film is that it (dare I say it?) renews your faith in the democratic process. In these cynical times, that is a good thing.















Canis lupus in unnatural habitat: True Wolf

It’s often said that “politics makes strange bedfellows”, but have you ever heard of a “wolf ambassador”? Before I screened Rob Whitehair’s modest but engrossing new documentary True Wolf, I certainly hadn’t. A cross between Born Free and Never Cry Wolf, Whitehair’s film tells the story of how a wolf named Koani became an environmental activist (in a manner of speaking) and touched the lives of thousands. Born into captivity, Koani was raised by Montana couple Bruce Weide and Pat Tucker, who co-founded Wild Sentry: The Northern Rockies Ambassador Wolf Program back in 1991. The star of the show was Koani, who travelled around the country with Tucker (and the family dog) to appear at schools and museums. Together, they helped dispel wolf myths.

The film mixes newer interviews with footage culled over the 16 years of Koani’s life, which was both a trial by fire and labor of love for her empathetic human “parents”. Ever cognizant of the inherent “wrong” (no matter how noble one’s intentions) in keeping such a magnificent wild creature enclosed or on a leash, Weide and Tucker nonetheless overcame the challenges and found a way to truly make Koani’s life matter, and it makes for an amazingly moving story. Whitehair balances the political side of the tale (which recounts the couple’s involvement in the uproar over wolf reintroduction to the Northern Rockies) by also giving screen time to detractors. The film also gives food for thought regarding the striking commonalities between wolves and humans, begging two key questions: a) who is living on whose turf, anyway? And, b)…can’t we all just get along?

Yeah, we’re coordinating. Waddaya gonna do about it?

Yeah, we’re coordinating. What are you gonna do about it?
by digby

Excuse me, but is this legal?

While most Americans will be enjoying the first weekend of summer outside and away from work, Mitt Romney will host his richest campaign donors at a retreat in Utah where they’ll have access to high-profile Republicans who would likely be in the candidate’s administration if he wins the race.

Usually, party bigwigs and donors have to wait until the conventions to hear leaders speak and rub elbows with the GOP elite, but not this summer, as many will be descending on the tony Deer Valley resort area of Park City beginning today.

The guest list is impressive — James Baker, Mike Leavitt, Bobby Jindal, Meg Whitman, Paul Ryan, John Thune, Condoleezza Rice, Rob Portman, Bob McDonnell, Tim Pawlenty, and many more recognizable GOP figures.

Including Karl Rove, the mastermind of George W. Bush’s presidency whose super PAC is raising millions of dollars to spend against President Obama in commercials. The confab in Utah is a reward for so-called campaign bundlers who have gathered donations for Romney, many of them around $150,000. But that money is limited by campaign finance law, whereas super PAC money is unrestricted. Just as the bundlers will have access to potential VPs, Rove will be in the same room as all of the donors, many of whom probably have more money to spend and know lots of other rich supporters who do, too.

Who knows if it’s legal? Furthermore, who cares?:

[W]hile the Federal Election Commission has established elaborate, though narrow, guidelines for determining whether the creation of a specific campaign advertisement violates the coordination ban, it has not focused on other kinds of activities between all PACs and candidates. Rules the commission adopted in 2003, still on the books, allow for regulation of this gray area, but they have been largely ignored.

“Most of the focus so far has been on the ads, but there may be a lot of other activity that is being coordinated between the campaigns and the super PACs that could be seen as resulting in a benefit to the campaign,” said Lawrence M. Noble, a campaign-finance lawyer at Skadden, Arps and a former general counsel for the election commission.

The regulations on coordination include a general prohibition on expenditures “made in cooperation, consultation or concert with, or at the request or suggestion” of candidates and their representatives. The commission’s records show that when devising this rule, it turned aside pleas from political groups to limit enforcement only to ads, saying such a narrow focus was not what Congress intended.

Nine years later, however, there is little evidence that the commission has followed through on this intent.

The commission, made up of three Republicans and three Democrats, has long been divided along partisan lines on how far to go in enforcing rules on coordinated expenditures, often resulting in paralysis.

Last fall, the commission was asked by American Crossroads if it could broadcast certain ads, “fully coordinated” with a candidate, who would be consulted about the script and appear in the advertisement. The group argued that it would not be improper as long as the ad ran outside of a time window established by the commission for “electioneering communications.”

The commission deadlocked and could reach no conclusion.

“The campaigns know the F.E.C. isn’t going to enforce the law, and so they’ve decided to do whatever they want,” said Fred Wertheimer, whose watchdog group, Democracy 21, has complained to the Justice Department about the lack of enforcement. “What is going on is just absurd.”

Who says we have a dysfunctional political system?

We have reached a point at which people like Karl Rove aren’t even trying to keep up the appearance of independence anymore, and Mitt Romney couldn’t care less. They know there will be no sanction, legal or social. Anything goes.

And this is exactly the sort of thing that plays into the “resistance is futile” strategy. Breaking the letter and spirit of the law completely out in the open and daring anyone to do something about it (knowing they won’t) reinforces the idea that it’s pointless to even try to oppose them.

Meanwhile, here’s a picture of a Very Serious Attendee who will be lecturing us all about morality just as soon as the unethical confab is over.

.

Mitt Romney creates a journalistic crisis, by @DavidOAtkins

Mitt Romney creates a journalistic crisis

by David Atkins

Close followers of the presidential election on both sides know that Mitt Romney has waged a campaign of breathtaking mendacity. His Republican primary opponents and their supporters know it, having been deluged with truth-bending attacks and mischaracterizations during debates. And, of course, Romney is now lying constantly about both his own and Democratic policies.

Steve Benen at the Maddow Blog has a list of thirty lies Mitt Romney has publicly told in just past week alone, his 23rd such weekly chronicle. Here are just the top ten:

1. In an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity, Romney claimed it’s fiscally responsible to eliminate the entirety of the Affordable Care Act: “It saves $100 billion a year to get rid of it.”

That’s the opposite of the truth. According to the CBO and other nonpartisan budget estimates, killing the law would make the deficit go up, not down, and would cost, not save, the country hundreds of billions of dollars in the coming years.

2. In the same interview, Romney said, “I think a lot of people forgetting is there is only one president in history that’s cut Medicare by $500 billion and that is President Obama.”

Romney says this a lot. He’s not telling the truth.

3. Romney also said, “I see people holding up signs, ‘Don’t touch my Medicare.’ It’s like, hey, I’m not touching your Medicare.”

Romney endorsed Paul Ryan’s House Republican Budget plan, which ends the Medicare program and replaces it with a private voucher scheme.

4. In the same interview, Romney said President Obama has “never had the experience of working in the private sector.”

Actually, that’s not true. Obama worked at a private-sector law firm before entering public service.

5. Romney also told Hannity Obama went on “an apology tour” in his first year.

As Romney surely knows by now, he’s lying.

6. Romney, trying to talk about foreign policy, said Syria is Iran’s “route to the sea.”

Iran doesn’t share a border with Syria, and Iran already borders two bodies of water.

7. At a campaign event in Stratham, New Hampshire, Romney claimed, “Bill Clinton and so many other mainstream Democrats are revolting against the backward direction President Obama is taking his party and our country.”

In reality, Bill Clinton supports the president’s re-election and recently said a Romney presidency would be “calamitous for our country and the world.”

8. At an event in Cornwall, Pennsylvania, shared an anecdote about a local optometrist who was forced to fill out a “33-page” change-of-address form — several times — at the post office.

There is no such change-of-address form.

9. At the same event, Romney said Obama is “taking away” scholarships and charter schools for “kids in Washington, D.C.”

This has become a line in Romney’s stump speech, but it isn’t in any way true.

10. Romney also claimed, “This president has put together almost as much public debt as all the prior presidents combined.”

That’s a lie.

And there are twenty more. Just this week.

This is not just a challenge for Romney’s Democratic and progressive opponents. At a structural and cultural level, it’s in large part a challenge for the studiously “objective” press. As Michael Cohen says at The Guardian:

This is perhaps the most interesting and disturbing element of Romney’s tireless obfuscation: that even when corrected, it has little impact on the presumptive GOP nominee’s behavior. This is happening at a time when fact-checking operations in major media outlets have increased significantly, yet that appears to have no effect on the Romney campaign.

What is the proper response when, even after it’s pointed out that the candidate is not telling the truth, he keeps doing it? Romney actually has a telling rejoinder for this. When a reporter challenged his oft-stated assertion that President Obama had made the economy worse (factually, not correct), he denied ever saying it in the first place. It’s a lie on top of a lie…

Back in the old days (that is, pre-2008) it would have been considered unimaginable that a politician would lie as brazenly as Romney does – for fear of embarrassment or greater scrutiny. When Joe Biden was accused of plagiarizing British Labor Leader Neil Kinnock’s speeches in 1988, it derailed his presidential aspirations. When Al Gore was accused of exaggerating his role in “inventing the internet” (which, actually, was sort of true), it became a frequent attack line that hamstrung his credibility. Romney has done far worse than either of these candidates – yet it’s hard to discern the negative impact on his candidacy.

Romney has figured out a loophole – one can lie over and over, and those lies quickly become part of the political narrative, practically immune to “fact-checking”. Ironically, the more Romney lies, the harder it then becomes to correct the record. Even if an enterprising reporter can knock down two or three falsehoods, there are still so many more that slip past.

Reporters can do one of two things in this context: either serve as dutiful stenographers for these lies and let his political opponents spin their wheels trying to debunk each one, or actually do their jobs in service of the truth and the public interest. Our ability as voters and informed citizens to make reasoned decisions hangs in the balance.

.
(h/t davidkc)

And Bigfoot is Santa Claus

And Bigfoot is Santa Claus

by digby

Here’s the latest dispatch from retrograde America, via Alternet:

This 2012-2013 school year, thanks to a bill pushed through by governor Bobby Jindal, thousands of students in Louisiana will receive state voucher money, transferred from public school funding, to attend private religious schools, some of which teach from a Christian curriculum that suggests the Loch Ness Monster disproves evolution and states that the alleged creature, which has never been demonstrated to even exist, has been tracked by submarine and is probably a plesiosaur. The curriculum also claims that a Japanese fishing boat caught a dinosaur.

On the list of schools approved to receive funding through the new voucher funding, that critics warn could eventually cut public school funding in half, are schools that teach from the Christian fundamentalist A Beka Book, Bob Jones University Press, and Accelerated Christian Education curriculum.

The rundown of everything that’s wrong with these textbooks is chilling. This is just a sample of what they’re teaching:

– Only ten percent of Africans can read or write, because Christian mission schools have been shut down by communists.

– “the [Ku Klux] Klan in some areas of the country tried to be a means of reform, fighting the decline in morality and using the symbol of the cross… In some communities it achieved a certain respectability as it worked with politicians.”

– “God used the ‘Trail of Tears’ to bring many Indians to Christ.”

– It “cannot be shown scientifically that that man-made pollutants will one day drastically reduce the depth of the atmosphere’s ozone layer.”

– “God has provided certain ‘checks and balances’ in creation to prevent many of the global upsets that have been predicted by environmentalists.”

– the Great Depression was exaggerated by propagandists, including John Steinbeck, to advance a socialist agenda.

– “Unions have always been plagued by socialists and anarchists who use laborers to destroy the free-enterprise system that hardworking Americans have created.”

– Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential win was due to an imaginary economic crisis created by the media.

– “The greatest struggle of all time, the Battle of Armageddon, will occur in the Middle East when Christ returns to set up his kingdom on earth.”

I joke all the time saying that it offends my religious beliefs to spend money on this, that or the other, mocking the right wingers’ religious liberty strategy. But this really is beyond the pale. I guess the parents who don’t want their kids taught this drivel can always send their kids to public school, but they’ll probably end up having to be in classes with 50 kids because the funding’s been slashed. Either way, an awful lot of kids will be filled full of fairy tales and right wing propaganda. I guess they’ll be taught to read at least, so that’s something …

.