Skip to content

Month: November 2012

Joe Lieberman to ride again?

Joe Lieberman to ride again?

by digby

Feel the magic:

In the race for U.S. Senate in Nebraska, Democrat Bob Kerrey received a cross-party endorsement from former senator and Republican Chuck Hagel.

Kerrey is in a heated battle with Republican state Sen. Deb Fischer to replace the retiring Democrat Sen. Ben Nelson.

The Nebraska Democratic Party announced the former, two-term GOP senator’s endorsement Thursday.

In the battle for a majority in the upper chamber, Democrats are vying to maintain control, 53 seats to Republican’s 47, but are defending 23 of the 33 seats up for grabs.

The Nebraska race is one to watch as it’s become close enough that it has joined others tight races that will determine the party control of the Senate which is hanging in the balance. In the reliably conservative state, Fischer has been considered a favorite in the race but a recent poll indicates a narrowing contest in the Cornhusker State.

A poll released Wednesday from the Omaha World-Herald showed 48% percent of likely voters in Nebraska support Fischer and 45% supported Kerrey, the former governor and U.S. senator from the state.

Oy Veh. If you loved Joe Lieberman you’re going to adore Bob Kerrey. Here’s just a tiny taste of what you have to look forward to:

August 28, 1996

CHICAGO – Sen. Bob Kerrey smells an odor coming from the Republican and Democratic stands on entitlements.

“It’s one of the cruelest things we do, when we say, Republicans or Democrats, `Oh, we can wait and reform Social Security later,’ ” the Nebraska Democrat said.

Mr. Kerrey says that without reform, entitlements will claim 100 percent of the Treasury in 2012.

“This is not caused by liberals, not caused by conservatives, but by a simple demographic fact,” Mr. Kerrey warned at a meeting of the Democratic Leadership Council.

“We [will have] converted the federal government into an ATM machine.”

Read all about him here.

.

Ole Mormon Mitt

Ole Mormon Mitt


by digby

I have written many times before that Mitt Romney is obviously sincere in his religious views and that he truly  is a patriarchal, conservative and emphatically anti-choice Mormon. Here he is more animated than I’ve ever seen him. (This is from 2008, by the way.)

The interesting thing to note here is his name-checking of Glenn Beck’s muse, Cleon Skousen. Romney professes not to be familiar with his 10ther, bircher tracts but says this

But Romney did recommend a Skousen book later in the discussion, when the subject turned to Mormon eschatology. “Cleon Skousen has a book called The Thousand Years,” Romney told Mickelson. The Thousand Years is actually a trilogy that details the 4,000 years that elapsed between the creation of the earth and the birth of Christ. The book, Romney said, could set Mickelson straight on what he actually believes. “It’s throughout the Bible. Christ appears in Jerusalem, splits the Mount of Olives to stop the war that’s coming in to kill all the Jews…That’s when the coming and glory of Christ occurs.”

Is Mitt Romney a creationist?

.

The Bloomberg Obsession, by @DavidOAtkins

The Bloomberg Obsession

by David Atkins

As grateful as I am for Mayor Bloomberg’s positive activism on climate change and his endorsement of the President, the media’s reaction to it has been nothing short of comical. The right-wing is predictably incensed about it. Chris Matthews seems to believe it matters a great deal, with the nodding approval of his guests.

So much so that when asked whether the Bloomberg endorsement would matter less or more than the Des Moines Register’s endorsement of Mitt Romney, they all resoundingly agreed that Bloomberg’s endorsement would matter more. And they stated as evidence that Bloomberg has started up PACs for centrist organizations, and is thus seen as a trustworthy voice.

Now, I’m the first one to state that newspaper endorsements don’t matter much. But to suggest that a persuadable voter in suburban Iowa cares more about Michael Bloomberg’s endorsement than the local paper’s is solipsistic navel-gazing of the worst kind. Or that voters know or care about Bloomberg’s self-serving neoliberal PACs is a joke.

The biggest joke is that people who believe these things serve as the supposed voices of the left on cable news. Being a reality-based progressive doesn’t have to mean being a barn-burning anger machine. But it should mean that the political importance and value of people like Bloomberg should be relegated to the asterisks they are.

.

They still dream of bipartisan comity

They still dream of bipartisan comity

by digby

I just heard yet another Democratic “strategist” state that an Obama victory will take the air out of all the GOP obstruction and likely create a new environment for bipartisanship. And I can’t help but be reminded of all the people who said that Republican extremism was dead after the last Obama election.

One guy didn’t. Remember this?

Barack Obama has not yet taken office, and Rush Limbaugh is already rooting for his failure. On his radio show last Friday, Limbaugh said, “I disagree fervently with the people on our [Republican] side of the aisle who have caved and who say, ‘Well, I hope he succeeds.’”

Limbaugh told his listeners that he was asked by “a major American print publication” to offer a 400-word statement explaining his “hope for the Obama presidency.” He responded:

So I’m thinking of replying to the guy, “Okay, I’ll send you a response, but I don’t need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails.” (interruption) What are you laughing at? See, here’s the point. Everybody thinks it’s outrageous to say. Look, even my staff, “Oh, you can’t do that.” Why not? Why is it any different, what’s new, what is unfair about my saying I hope liberalism fails? Liberalism is our problem. Liberalism is what’s gotten us dangerously close to the precipice here. Why do I want more of it? I don’t care what the Drive-By story is. I would be honored if the Drive-By Media headlined me all day long: “Limbaugh: I Hope Obama Fails.” Somebody’s gotta say it.

Even Pat Robertson clutched his pearls over that one. How’d that work out?

People should not forget who really leads this Republican Party. And they will be playing for 2016 as much as they were playing for 2012.

.

Destabilizing the fundamental mechanism of democracy

Destabilizing the fundamental mechanism of democracy


by digby

Boy, I sure am hearing a lot of complacency among liberals right now about the awesome superiority of the Obama GOTV operation and the lousy GOP effort by comparison. That may be true, although there’s some reason to believe that the right has organized pretty well outside the presidential campaign.

But this sort of thing is designed to delay voting for legitimate voters in the hope that it will create chaos at the polls and force people to give up.  If it’s close it will serve as fodder for their predictable claim that the vote was stolen and/or to contest the results:

A new ThinkProgress investigation has found that in Iowa, Romney poll watchers are being trained to watch for voters who show up without a photo ID, even though no voter ID law exists in the state.

In a training video for Romney poll watchers in Iowa, the narrator tells volunteers to be on the lookout for anytime “a voter fails to show a voter ID and they are still permitted to vote.” If that happens, he says, “alert the legal team so they can handle the problem.” The text of the campaign’s slide, however, says something contradictory, instructing volunteers when poll workers should check the voter’s ID. Despite the mixed messages, the slide ends with: “If an election worker is not checking photo ID, please call the legal hotline immediately.”

NARRATOR: Naturally, you’re probably wondering what irregularities may come up throughout the day. We’ll walk you through some quick examples. First, there may be an instance where a voter fails to show a voter ID and they are still permitted to vote. If you notice this, use the legal help button to alert the legal team so they can handle the problem and you can get back to checking voters.

This video is part of Romney’s massive nationwide poll-watcher effort on Election Day. The campaign is training 34,000 volunteers to fan out in swing states across the country and monitor for voter fraud. Romney personally touted Project ORCA in a video released Wednesday evening, telling poll watchers that they’ll “be the key link in providing critical, real-time information to me.” Because of the program, Romney said, “our campaign will have an unprecedented advantage on Election Day.”

The “critical, real-time information” is unlikely to be about which Grandmas haven’t been taken to the polls yet, I’m afraid. They are looking for ways to gum up the works and create a voter fraud narrative.

The Republican Party had convinced itself that the Reagan election ushered in a thousand year reign and that Democrats simply could never win again.  When that proved to be false in the 90s they started this scheme to destabilize and delegitimize the people’s choice — the most fundamental mechanism of our democracy.  First they tried to force Clinton to resign from office through a series of trumped up scandals and then impeached him for a personal indiscretion. The following years brought the debacle of the 2000 election, unprecedented gerrymandering in out years, the politicization of the Department of Justice voting rights division, the firing of Attorneys General who refused to interfere in elections and prosecute bogus voter fraud issues, the institutionalization of “voter ID”, and now this. Another close presidential election will further put their plans to the test.

One can only hope that the Democrats are prepared for how the nation will react in an era of extreme polarization. After all, if Republicans already believe that President Obama is a hardcore socialist muslim backed by the powerful vote-stealing Black Panthers so it’s fairly sure that they will see any contested election in that light.  And the rest of use will see this plan at work and be gaslighted by the press and the political establishment just as we were last time. The fact is that the system has already been successfully destabilized. On purpose.  By the right. And I’m not sure how we fix it.

.

The arguments in brief: one’s based on fantasy, one’s based on abstraction

The arguments in brief: one’s based on personal fantasy, one’s based on historical abstraction

by digby

I think these two essays in the latest issue of TIME magazine spell out pretty clearly how the two sides see this election:

The essays making the case for each nominee are by E.J. Dionne, the author and liberal Washington Post columnist, and Rich Lowry, the author and editor of the conservative National Review. Lowry’s closing argument strikes some petty notes (calling Obama “high handed,” contemptuous of opposing political views and displaying “shocking classlessness”) while Dionne makes a historical case for the gulf between the parties today (arguing Romney’s plans are “more suited to the Gilded Age” while Obama’s belief in a safety net harkens to the Progressive Era”).

The Republicans are making a highly personal case against a fantasy Obama who has been a hardcore leftist contemptuous of bipartisanship, while the Democrats are making an abstract case against GOP elitism and extremism. Sounds about right.

.

Cold Civil War

Cold Civil War


by digby

I saw this segment yesterday and wondered if the wingnuts were going to have a Breitbartian breakdown over it. (The fact that it’s obvious and has been since 2004 is irrelevant):

And yes, they did. Take a look at the comments at FoxNation:

Hey CHARMSDAD, If you think that their desperation is bad now just wait untill they loose.

hawaii556 minutes ago
Who paid for this man’s education? What a waste!!

Former gilgamish5 minutes ago
@hawaii55 The taxpayers

charmsdad13 minutes ago
The left is, predictably, screaming “racism” as we approach the election. This is nothing more than an act of desperation.

bigctex14 minutes ago
If I have one more liberal tell me I’m a racist I just mite become one

samking7314 minutes ago
@bigctex I know.

cunov615 minutes ago
Might be time to accept it and move on with life with Mitt Romney as your President. BTW, he will be President of all the United States, blacks included. That’s the way it works, right Toure?

samking7314 minutes ago
@cunov6 Unlike Obama who chose to be president for a third of the country only.

keltic117 minutes ago
Are these guys wacko? When I served from 70-77. I served with many a Southerner that swore an oath to defend the Republic & they loved this nation. My Father served in WWII same thing. Korean vets I have talked with same thing.

keonigohan_jr17 minutes ago
Will someone tell this obama slave slavery is over.

hiv30yr21 minutes ago
…could it POSSIBLY be the state flags?

Former gilgamish14 minutes ago
@hiv30yr Out of the states that WILL vote for Romney just how many of them exactly incorperate the image of the Confederate battle flag?

mcveigh21 minutes ago
If you bump your leg on the tv stand, you can watch your knee grow

Tx_SouthernGrace23 minutes ago
Toure isn’t just a racist … he is a militant racist.

fredlvnv397 minutes ago
@Tx_SouthernGrace why does any “intellegent” person even watch these LIBSCUM anyway?

blight144 minutes ago
@Tx_SouthernGrace How can that be, by defintion it implies a feeling of superiority over other races….SURELY these cretins aren’t that stupid……to whom are they superior, they’re about the bottom of the barrel……

mamadore26 minutes ago
Another black racist liberal. I am so sick and tired of them and their racist rhetoric.

astroglidebarry26 minutes ago
Aw, poor little guy. He knows that without racísm the ‘cøward-in-chief’ Obama has nothing at all.

308bthp30 minutes ago
liberals living in the past. pathetic. so 1800’s

I wonder what these people are going to do if they lose?

.

God’s candidate

God’s candidate

by digby

photo by Jeff Prant

From what I can gather, the organization Americans For The Mormon Awakening exists solely as a Facebook group. But they obviously sold some bumper stickers so they are following Mitt’s creed.

.

When The Onion does better journalism than the journalists, by @DavidOAtkins

When The Onion does better journalism than the journalists

by David Atkins

The Onion reports:

Following Hurricane Sandy’s destructive tear through the Northeast this week, the nation’s 300 million citizens looked upon the trail of devastation and fully realized, for the first time, that this is just going to be something that happens from now on.

Gradually comprehending that this sort of thing is now just a fact of life, citizens all across America stared blankly at images of destroyed homes, major cities paralyzed by flooding, and ravaged communities covered in debris, and finally acknowledged that this, apparently, is now a regular part of the human experience.

“Oh, I see—this is just going to be how it is from here on out,” said New York City resident Brian Marcello, coming to terms with the fact that an immense storm that cripples mass transit systems and knocks out power for millions in the nation’s largest metropolitan area can no longer be regarded as an isolated, freak incident, and will henceforth be just a normal thing that happens. “Hugely destructive weather events are going to keep happening, and they are going to get worse and worse, and living through them is something that will be a part of all our lives from now on, whether we like it or not.”

“I get it now,” Marcello added.

It continues for a while in that vein, then closes with the punchline:

“Right now, Americans all across the country are watching the aftermath of this storm and at long last recognizing that this is what life is like now,” said Dr. Richard Morales, a climatologist at the University of Pennsylvania. “Admittedly, it could take a little while for some to fully acknowledge it, but at the end of the day, people will be much happier once they accept that they and their loved ones will likely suffer the consequences of an even stronger, more deadly hurricane at some point very soon. It’s going to happen.”

“I went through something very similar a few years ago when I finally came to terms with the fact that no one would ever listen to anything I said about global warming,” Morales added. “And that it is entirely too late to do anything about it.”

What’s most depressing is that the time to figure out a real solution to this problem was ten to twenty years ago. Now we’re at a point where mitigation simply saves us from a world-burning, cataclysmic, extinction level 5C increase. The 2C rise that will lead to an increasing frequency of catastrophic weather events is already inevitable.

Throw it onto the pile of short-term thinking and unsustainable legacy of a dying economic model eating itself and the world alive.

.