Skip to content

Month: May 2013

Double trouble: Get ready for the next IRS “scandal”

Double trouble: Get ready for the next IRS “scandal”

by digby

Yes, they’re already on it:

On top of the troubles the administration is facing over its handling of the attack on the Benghazi mission, the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups, and the Justice Department’s seizure of Associated Press phone records, Republicans hope to target Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

They are questioning her soliciting of funds on behalf of a non-profit group, called Enroll America, from two private entities, a practice which if not unprecedented is at the very least unusual. Federal law bars officials from soliciting any organization or individual with whom they do business or regulate.

Enroll America is run by the president’s former campaign backers to do something Congress refused to fund: sell “Obamacare” to the public.

An HHS statement last week said that since March Sebelius solicited financial donations for Enroll America from H&R Block Inc, the tax preparation company, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a philanthropic entity devoted to public health issues. Asked Monday for a list of all solicitations before or after March, an HHS spokesman referred Reuters to the department’s original statement.

Neither H&R Block nor the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation are regulated by HHS, the department’s spokesman said, so there was nothing improper or illegal about soliciting them.
[…]

The Enroll America issue is complicated by the fact that Republicans in Congress have succeeded in blocking proposed government spending that otherwise could have been used to achieve the ends pursued by the independent group.

That has given lawmakers, such as Republican U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander, an opening to allege a violation of the federal “anti-deficiency” act, which bars agencies from accepting “voluntary” services except when authorized by law.

In defense of the help the department is getting from Enroll America, an HHS spokesman said it is permitted by a section of the Public Health Service Act that allows the secretary to encourage support for new and innovative health programs.

Some conservative legal experts say finding a clear-cut violation of the law is a long shot. “I would be skeptical of the claim that it’s illegal, unless someone made a really compelling case. However, the appearance is such that it at least raises questions,” said Jonathan Adler, a law professor at Case Western University who opposes healthcare reform.

But legal issues may be the least of the concerns for supporters of the healthcare law.

They worry that a political storm over Obamacare, with congressional hearings likely, could discourage private donors to Enroll America and jeopardize the administration’s ability to find the funds needed to reach a public that is already largely unaware of the healthcare reforms.

I wrote about this building pseudo-scandal the other day, and it appears it’s gaining steam. I noticed that on Fox yesterday it came up several times as “yet another case of the Obama administration shaking down private industry.” When I first read about it, the suggestion was that Sebelius was appealing to insurance companies rather than trying to find corporate sponsors for the purpose of educating the public about Obamacare, which is slightly different, but still not particularly scandalous.

After all, if the congress would agree to fund the outreach as any sane government would do for a big new government program, this wouldn’t be necessary.  But naturally, they are trying to make it fail so they don’t want the public to be informed of what the new benefits are and what they need to do to get enrolled in insurance and obtain the subsidies.

But this administration rationale doesn’t make sense to me to be honest:

“The danger” to the health program, said former Obama healthcare adviser Nancy-Ann DeParle, “is that people don’t come and enroll and get insured. That leaves the health plans in the exchanges trying to cover people without any young, healthy people, and it drives the price up.”

I think we can probably count on the insurance companies to handle that, don’t you? After all, these young healthy people who are mandated to buy insurance are the new money machine for the insurance companies. The reason they agreed to offer coverage for pre-existing conditions and preventive care was so they could get all these young healthy people paying for their product. I have a feeling they’ll be more than willing to “reach-out” to this population and help them navigate the new system.

As for using an outside group, sponsored by the private sector, to help educate the public about the new IRS rule well, Houston, we’ve got a problem, and it’s not the one the Republicans cite in that article. (Indeed, one would have thought the GOP would be thrilled to have the private sector step up instead of Big Gummint, right?)

No, the article talks about Sebelius going to H&R Block and there’s a reason for that — somebody has to educate millions of people about how these subsidies are going to work. If it can’t be the government, then logically you’d think that the tax preparation industry might want to step up and do it. It’s advertising for their services, after all. Unfortunately the IRS “Tea party” hysteria is flowing directly into this one with the right wing already screeching incoherently about how the IRS is going to kill conservatives in their sleep by denying them access to health care or some such nonsense. I’m going to guess that these companies are not going to be too anxious to step into that quick sand unless there’s a huge financial incentive to do so — and I don’t think there is.

So Sebelius is in a tough position with this one. However, I would bet anything that there will be plenty of information available via this here internet to guide most people through. Certainly the government web-sites and offices will be able to provide information. I’m just not sure that it’s entirely necessary to have a huge TV/radio/newspaper campaign. Yes, it would be nice for the administration to be able to tout all the improvements in the system and make it as easy as possible. But I don’t think the lack of that will actually inhibit people from finding out what they need to find out. Between the insurance companies, the internet and the usual tax forms, I’d guess we’ll muddle by.

I sure hope so because from the looks of things the Republicans are going to have a field day shutting down this Sebelius plan and keeping the IRS on its heels. Implementation was never going to be easy, but they’re going to do everything they have at making sure it’s as difficult as possible. (And they call themselves patriots…)

As for whether the administration gets credit for the health care improvements in the public’s mind — well, if it all works out, the smartest thing they ever did was stop resisting the term “Obamacare.” That will last a very long time.

If it doesn’t they were screwed anyway, so no harm no foul.

.

Your Daily Grayson

Your Daily Grayson

by digby

Howie filled in the background of the House maneuver in this post and concluded:

House Rules define an earmark as legislation authorizing a grant to an entity outside of statutory, administrative, or competitive award process. Section 6 of H.R. 3 grants a right-of-way and a temporary use permit, outside of an established statutory, administrative, or competitive award process, to only one entity: the Keystone XL pipeline. The bill also is unconstitutional because it violates the separation of powers, and offends the principle underlying the prohibition of bills of attainder.

Speaker John Boehner has two days to consider and respond to Grayson’s resolution.

“The Keystone XL Pipeline deal is an earmark to a foreign corporation, plain and simple,” Grayson said. “House Republicans claim to have been incredibly keen on ridding our legislative system of Congressional earmarks– yet here they are– hypocritically sneaking one in for a foreign corporation. They seem to believe that the ‘no earmarks’ rule does not apply to them. That’s just unacceptable.”

I’m pretty sure the Republicans (and a fair number of Democrats) think that giveaways to oil companies are what they’ve been sent to congress to do. They certainly don’t think of them as “earmarks” which I believe are defined as “any local project that doesn’t benefit one of my rich donors.”

I’m all for congressional authority and I would guess that in this case, the President might even welcome them taking that Keystone hot potato off his hands.  But this is a a crude (pardon the pun) usurpation of executive power,  in order to favor a specific, and extremely controversial, project is brazen, even by this congress’ standards.

.

Wolf Blitzer makes America cringe, by @DavidOAtkins

Wolf Blitzer makes America cringe

by David Atkins

This is hard to watch:

I don’t know what Blitzer’s personal religious views are, but he comes across in this segment as attempting to talk down to the “little people” of Oklahoma as one of them by using their religious vernacular. Blitzer doesn’t seem like the Bible-thumping type, but he is extremely condescending and constantly out of his depth. Fantastically for her, the tornado victim he was interviewing had the courage of her convictions and embarrassed the heck out of him.

CNN is such a mess.

.

Another great survival story in the midst of devastation: a mom reunited with her young son

Another great survival story in the midst of devastation: a mom reunited with her young son

by digby

He was apparently kept safe by his teacher. You can just feel her overwhelming relief:

And people are going the extra mile to help:

Kevin Durant is doing what he can to help. The Oklahoma City Thunder star has donated $1 million to the American Red Cross for disaster relief, according to Red Cross Oklahoma.

Durant on Monday encouraged his Twitter followers to text “REDCROSS” to 90999 for $10 donations to help tornado victims.

It’s easy.  I just did it.

If you’re in Oklahoma, these relief agencies and volunteer organizations are all looking for help.

.

Stock market highs — and high unemployment: the new normal?

Stock market highs — and high unemployment: the new normal?

by digby

The Washington Post rather blandly reports today that nobody in the government gives a damn about unemployment anymore because the stock market is roaring and the wealthy donor class in both parties is partying like rock stars. No really:

Washington has all but abandoned efforts to help the economy recover faster — and lawmakers don’t seem worried that voters will punish them for it.

There are no serious negotiations underway between the White House and congressional leaders on legislation to spur growth, and no bipartisan “gangs” of senators are huddling to craft a compromise job-creation package.

Yet economic growth remains slow by historical standards, and 11.5 million Americans are still looking for work. More than 4 million people have been unemployed for longer than six months. A Washington Post-ABC News poll found in April that two-thirds of Americans said jobs were difficult to find in their communities.
[…]
“I’m disappointed that there isn’t more of an effort being made” on the economy, said John Engler, the Republican former governor of Michigan who is now president of the Business Roundtable. “I don’t know if people have concluded that there’s been a reset — we’ve accepted these higher levels [of unemployment] and that’s a new normal. I hope not.”

Why? CEOs and stockholders are doing just fine. I’m sure they’ll get to job creatin’ any day now:

One key Washington constituency is feeling a new normal: stock market highs.

Fifty-two percent of white Americans earning $50,000 a year or more are optimistic about the national economy, a 13-percentage-point increase from December, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll. Thanks largely to that shift and to persistent optimism among higher- income nonwhites, economic optimism among all Americans is at its highest level since early 2009.

The change tracks the performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, which has risen 20 percent in the past six months. Higher-income Democrats and, perhaps most notably, Republicans are all feeling the effects. Obama’s approval rating for handling the economy among higher-income Republicans and GOP-leaning independents, while dismal, has more than doubled over the past six months.

Well, as long as they’re happy. But it does raise the question: with all this confidence, why aren’t they creating more jobs?

Oh right. I forgot. They’re worried about regulations now. But hey, at least we’ve made sure that labor costs stay low even as the moneyed elite are cleaning up on their investments. I’m sure they’ll get to dismantling all the consumer and safety regulations in due time:

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), vice chairman of the Congress Joint Economic Committee, said her efforts have moved past a “crisis mentality” and talk of “stimulus” and into measures to boost America’s economic competiveness in the long term, including skills training for workers, infrastructure improvements, export promotion and streamlining some government regulations.

She’s optimistic some of those initiatives could win enough bipartisan support in both the Senate and the House to become law this year. “If it was up to me,” she said, “this is all we’d be doing.”

There ya go.

The tone of this piece is so blase — simply observing the phenomenon as if it’s an act of nature — that I have to assume this is just Village conventional wisdom. 7+ percent unemployment for years on end is kind of a shame, but there’s no need to get all hot and bothered about it. It’s just the way it is. The new normal. Is that sustainable?

.

Too big to fire, by @DavidOAtkins

Too big to fire

by David Atkins

We already knew that JP Morgan is too big to fail, and its powerful CEO Jame Dimon too big to jail. But now it appears that even after a string of multi-billion dollar losses, Dimon is too big to fire:

Jamie Dimon, the nation’s most powerful banker, can hold onto his title of chairman after JPMorgan Chase’s shareholders decisively defeated a proposal to split the two top jobs.

The vote to split the roles of chairman and chief executive — both of which have been held by Mr. Dimon since 2006 — received only 32.2 percent of shares voted. That is down from a vote of roughly 40 percent in support of a similar proposal last year.

All 11 directors of the bank’s board were also re-elected.

Shares of JPMorgan were up more than 2 percent in midday trading.

The votes were a convincing show of shareholder support for Mr. Dimon and the board even amid persistent questions about the bank’s controls and its dealings with regulators. Those questions have emerged after a multibillion-dollar trading loss in the bank’s chief investment office in London surprised investors last year.

Why did shareholders re-elect him?

The shareholder vote on the proposal for an independent chairman was closely watched and provided some uncomfortable scrutiny of Mr. Dimon’s leadership.

Yet some industry analysts have said that a vote in support of Mr. Dimon was assured by the complexity of JPMorgan Chase. A vote to divest Mr. Dimon of the chairman title might have prompted him to walk away, threatening to disrupt the rosy stream of profits the bank has earned for three years.

So Jamie Dimon uses his connections to assure that the government bails out his business that would otherwise have gone defunct, while continuing to extract enormous rents from the real American economy to enrich himself and his predatory friends. His business is too big and too complex to be allowed to fail, a fact which he uses to his advantage.

And even after enormous losses to the bank are revealed–losses that accrued in large part due to the complexity of the banking system–shareholders are too fond of the ill-gotten gains he provides and too fearful that no one else will understand the overwrought complexity of the business to even consider firing him.

We essentially have a class of totally unaccountable royalty on Wall Street today.

.

Hey progressive Los Angeles: don’t forget to vote. It’s important for today and the future

Hey progressive Los Angeles: don’t forget to vote. It’s important for today and the future.

by digby

I live in Santa Monica so I can’t vote in today’s election. But if I could I’d vote for Eric Garcetti for mayor. And if you want to know why, read Howie’s glowing endorsement. I’ll just quote the opening:

I don’t recall any L.A. Mayor going on to be President of the United States. Eric Garcetti could be the first.

(I would only add that he’s one of the most normal politicians I’ve ever met, which may just disqualify him for that office.)

He’s a real progressive and a good politician. If you’re an LA voter don’t wimp out and say it doesn’t matter. It does. He’ll be good for LA, and Lord knows this city needs some smart leadership. But we need good, smart, young progressives like Garcetti in the pipeline. This is step one.

.

There’s hypocrisy … and then there’s Inhofe

There’s hypocrisy … and then there’s James Inhofe

by digby

Look, he’s never been the most consistent guy around and it’s pretty obvious he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed. But this really takes the cake. Here’s Joan Walsh:

Inhofe, of course, believes his state deserves those resources, even though he voted down aid to Hurricane Sandy victims. On MSNBC, Chris Jansing confronted Inhofe about his calling the Sandy aid bill a “slush fund,” and the brazen right-winger insisted the two issues shouldn’t be linked.

“Let’s look at that, that was totally different,” Inhofe told Jansing. “They were getting things—for instance that was supposed to be in New Jersey, they had things in the Virgin Islands, they were fixing roads there, they were putting roofs on houses in Washington D.C., everyone was getting in and exploiting the tragedy taking place. That won’t happen in Oklahoma.”

Inhofe’s answer is too dishonest to fully parse. First of all, there was Sandy damage way beyond New Jersey, including in the Caribbean and Washington D.C. too. And Inhofe had different objections to the Sandy bill at the time. In a rambling, hard to follow Senate floor speech blocking Sandy aid last December, the Oklahoma conservative objected to the bill’s timing – “There’s always a lot of theater right before Christmas time… We shouldn’t be talking about it right before Christmas” – even though it was already going on two months since the storm ravaged the east coast.

Here’s the Youtube of Inhofe’s incoherent rant against Hurricane Sandy funding. One of the commenters writes:

Do you think New Yorkers will be as kind to us as you were to them?

I hope not.

They won’t. They actually believe we are one country. James Inhofe doesn’t.

By the way, President Obama’s BRFF Tom Coburn is being consistent saying he won’t vote for disaster funding for his own state unless there are offsetting cuts elsewhere. And that means he not only thinks it’s cool that some states already pay far more in taxes and get less back than Oklahoma, but their citizens — only the poorer ones natch — should also give up what little they do get for Oklahoma’s disasters. Win, win, win for Tom Coburn.

Harry Reid should bring a funding bill to the floor and make Tom Coburn vote against it. Maybe his constituents will be impressed by his consistency. Maybe …

.

Dispatch from Taser Nation: dealing humanely with peaceful protesters is just too much trouble

Dispatch from Taser Nation: dealing humanely with peaceful protesters is just too much trouble

by digby

You may have heard about the protests at the DOJ by foreclosed upon homeowners demanding that Eric Holder prosecute some bankers for their criminal activity. If you haven’t, you can read all about it here.

Unfortunately, I received reports last night that citizens exercising their right to peacefully protest were being casually tasered by the authorities.

This came from my friend Jason Rosenbaum, who was there:

At the start of the action, when the protesters and homeowners arrived at the south entrance of the DOJ, we were greeted by half a dozen police in tactical gear or uniforms and a metal barrier cutting off access to a small courtyard in front of the large DOJ doors. The group of protesters rallied at the barrier and the planters next to it that made up the square and homeowners slowly climbed over the barriers in an attempt to gain an audience at the DOJ and register their complaints. At that point, the police were keeping people from climbing over, but eventually the police retreated and a few homeowners and protesters made it over and sat down to occupy that space. More joined them. After about 10 minutes, as more climbed over the barrier and the crowd occupied more space, the police retreated up the few steps leading to the door, and eventually ceded the square entirely by going inside the DOJ, leaving the protesters and homeowners alone in the square. The protesters took down the barriers at that point and everyone occupied the square, complete with signs, chants, couches, tents, and the like. (There’s video/photos of this on my Twitter feed, @j_ro.)

That was phase one — for the next phase, the protest split into three groups, with one staying at the south entrance and the two others to take entrances on the north and west sides of the building. I went with the group going to the west, and we were met again by police presence at the west entrance. We pushed on through to the north entrance around the block, and again were met by police. After sitting down there for a bit and taking the intersection down the block, we were notified that our brethren needed our help back at the south entrance and we marched over.

When I got there with the crowd in my group, the police had about a dozen homeowners in plastic cuffs on the south steps and had set up a police line around the original square in front of the door. The people in my group rushed through the line to sit down with their fellow protesters and homeowners being arrested, and it was at this point that at least one officer took out his taser gun, pulled the trigger, and started using it to push back those in the crowd coming to the support of those being arrested. That’s what you see in my video. As Matt noted, it was over very quickly, with protesters looking to peacefully support those who were being arrested being tased and pushed back, and those being arrested led into a police van and driven away for processing.

At this point, as the arrests were being loaded into the van, another group of about a dozen sat down inside the police barrier and as far as I know they’re still there (I had to leave about an hour after the initial arrests). So there may be more arrests to come shortly.

There is nothing new about protesters gathering at government buildings. And it has never been a problem for the police to arrest protesters in an orderly fashion, even when the protesters are not cooperating by sitting down and refusing to move. This is the way civil disobedience has worked for many a moon.

Shooting protesters full of electricity in order to get them to fall to the ground in excruciating pain, dazed and compliant, however, is new. And it’s completely unnecessary, not to mention contrary to our long tradition of peaceful protest. I thought this sort of thing went out with the use of firehoses and police dogs.

It happened again today, this time well captured on video:

Note the casual sadism. The young woman is surrounded by three men as she links arms with another protester. She does not appear to be in any way violent or threatening. The big man behind her holds her around the neck and whispers in her ear (who knows what he told her, but if it’s the usual, he says “cooperate right now or you’re going to be tased.”) As a peaceful protester engaged in civil disobedience she naturally refuses. At this point, they would normally pick her up bodily and carry her to the paddy wagon. Instead, they hit her with 50,000 volts of electricity, she crumbles to the ground as her whole body is overwhelmed by pain.

And then they blithely walk away, leaving her writhing on the ground. Let’s just say they were lucky she wasn’t one of the thousands of people who’ve died from tasers. I guess they would have noticed at some point when she stopped screaming.

This makes me sick to my stomach. And that it happened on the steps of the United States Department of Justice makes me ashamed to be an American.

The woman who was tasered is named Carmen Pittman. Here’s her story. I guess she just hasn’t been punished enough.

.