Skip to content

Month: August 2013

Cokie Roberts, telling it like it is

Cokie Roberts, telling it like it is

by digby

No really:

In a roundtable discussion on ‘This Week’, ABC News’ Cokie Roberts reflected on the progress in our country 50 years after the March on Washington and Martin Luther King Jr.’s ‘I have a Dream’ speech.

“Growing up in the Deep South in the era of Jim Crow, the difference is dramatic… It’s a great testament to the fact that when you do something like pass a voting rights bill. That makes a difference.”

Still, Robert’s expressed concern over recent legislation on the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In June the Supreme Court invalidated key parts of this law, which spurred contentious debates on race and equal opportunity. Critics of the ruling call it a regression. Proponents argue that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is outdated.

Robert’s said, “What’s going on about voting rights is downright evil because it is something that really needs to keep going forward not backward.”

When she’s right, she’s right.

The are all terrorists now

The are all terrorists now

by digby

It was only a matter of time. They had been using the “T” word to justify their crackdown for a while. (It makes everything so much more efficient for the government, don’t you know, to just call everything terrorism.)  Now they’ve taken the next logical step:

Having crushed the Muslim Brotherhood, the Egyptian authorities have begun cracking down on other dissenters, sometimes labeling even liberal activists or labor organizers as dangerous Islamists.

Ten days ago, the police arrested two left-leaning Canadians — one of them a filmmaker specializing in highly un-Islamic movies about sexual politics — and implausibly announced that they were members of the Brotherhood, the conservative Islamist group backing the deposed president, Mohamed Morsi. In Suez this month, police and military forces breaking up a steelworkers strike charged that its organizers were part of a Brotherhood plot to destabilize Egypt.

On Saturday, the chief prosecutor ordered an investigation into charges of spying against two prominent activists associated with the progressive April 6 group.

I think the great American war president George W. Bush said it best: “You’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists.”

.

Meditations on The Village

Meditations on The Village

by digby

This excerpt comes from a piece by Michael Winship on how much Washington has  changed since the Nixon years.  The social and cultural changes are quite striking.  But this says it all:

[T]he biggest difference between then and now, as the great Washington journalist Bob Kaiser titled a book not too long ago, is that there’s “So Damn Much Money,” with lobbyists spending almost three times what they did a dozen years ago and an ever-increasing number of ex-members of Congress, staffers and regulators running full tilt through the revolving door and joining the ranks of the extravagantly paid.

“People talk about the size of the federal government,” my brother noted, “and yet that hasn’t changed enormously. Instead, it’s the emergence of all the ancillaries to government — law firms, lobbyists, communications companies, government service providers — that have flooded the city with people and money.” What’s more, there’s “the explosion of the permanent military-industrial complex, which Eisenhower warned about and the Cold War made real. The post 9/11 world has just mushroomed this corporate impact, aided and abetted by the penchant for outsourcing that has essentially created contractor-led defense and security establishments that parallel/shadow (and profit from) their government counterparts.”

Washington has become the most affluent metropolitan area in the country. A 2012 Gallup poll rated it the most economically confident region of the United States. And with so damn much money has come a building boom: a once dying downtown has turned into office buildings, restaurants, stores and luxury apartments, forcing others out of the way. African Americans were as much as 71 percent of the District’s population when I lived there in the seventies; today that number has fallen to a little less than half, with many having to move outside the city.
[…]
“They are not one-dimensional and certainly not bad people,” Leibovich writes. “They come with varied backgrounds, intentions, and, in many cases – maybe most cases – for the right reasons. As they become entrenched, maybe their hearts get a bit muddled and their motives, too…” Too often, the game becomes more important than those for whom government should exist to help.

As an observer from far away, one of the more irritating characteristics one sees in some DC denizens is their unwillingness to admit the effect of big money and the celebrity culture. Many members of the political culture, particularly the media, insist on pretending that they are still just down home folks who shop at Walmart. That’s the essence of my critique of the Village — this obnoxious insistence that money, fame and power haven’t changed them despite all evidence to the contrary. What this translates to to, especially among liberals, is the belief that their concerns match the concerns of the average American. And it just ain’t so.

Anyway, yeah. It’s all about the flood of money that is flowing around and through our political system and the media that’s supposed to inform the citizens. I honestly don’t know what has to happen to change it.

.

John McCain itching to lob more bombs, by @DavidOAtkins

John McCain itching to lob more bombs

by David Atkins

One shudders to imagine a John McCain presidency:

The ongoing delays on a White House decision to take military action against embattled Syrian President Bashar Assad are essentially a “green light” to the regime to continue its bloody campaign against rebel forces in the country, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said late Friday.

“When we do nothing, not only do they have a green light, but this gives a green light to brutal dictators all over the world they can do the same thing,” McCain said.

McCain’s comments come after recent reports of chemical weapon use by Assad forces against anti-government rebels in and around the capital city of Damascus.

First off, the evidence is not fully in that this was indeed an attack by Assad. It’s highly likely, but unproven as yet. It wouldn’t be the first time John McCain has advocated war based on uncertain evidence of weapons of mass destruction.

But beyond that, it isn’t clear that the United States has any “good” options in Syria. On one side is a brutal dictator with no compunction about murdering his people; on the other is a group partly made up of decent oppressed Syrians, but partly also made up of of Islamist fundamentalists and Al Qaeda sympathizers. Even if the United States were to take sides in the mess (presumably against Assad), it’s not clear that the cure would not be worse than the disease.

Finally, it’s not really up to the United States to give green lights to dictators except through direct support. As it happens, the United States has given green lights to many murderous dictators like Augusto Pinochet and Saddam Hussein, both of whom were supported by both sides of the Washington establishment. But to effectively stop Assad would require the cooperation of the nations of the world in a truly international peacekeeping effort. Action by the United States alone would set off a series of unpleasant and counterproductive dominoes.

John McCain and many other hawks seem far less interested in what will help the Syrian people, and far more interested in what will make them look and feel “tough” as Americans and conservative politicians. It’s a good thing they’re not in control of the launch codes.

.

Saturday night at the movies by Dennis Hartley: Looking for comedy in the gentile world

Saturday night at the movies


Looking for comedy in the gentile world


By Dennis Hartley

Now say something funny: When Comedy Went to School
















Regular readers will likely roll their eyes if I kick off yet one more post with “Back in my stand up days…” So anyway, back in my stand up days, I developed a “hook” for the act based on being a Jew from Alaska. “Feast your eyes,” I would tell the stone-faced crowd by way of introduction, “You’re looking at an actual Jew from Alaska. We’re a rarity. We call ourselves ‘Jewskimos’.” Sporadic chuckles. Wait a beat. “God’s Frozen People.” HUGE laughs (usually). Okay, you’ve got ‘em. Don’t lose momentum. “In fact…and I have to say I don’t share this with every audience,” I would confide, “My Jewskimo name is ‘Kvetches With Wolves’. That was given to me by my rabbi…Rabbi Iceberg.” Hearty guffaws, occasionally light applause. If I didn’t have them by then, I knew I was fucked.

I never really stopped to analyze why I made a conscious decision to play up my “Jewishness” to milk laughs/approval from a roomful of drunken strangers night after night. After all, my father is a WASP farm boy from rural Ohio, and my mother is a nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn, so technically speaking, I’m not 100 per cent Kosher…I could swing either way. Why not play up my WASP-y “half”? Why did I eschew the straw hat for the yarmulke? Is it the Jewish half (DNA?) that makes me “ha-ha” funny?

It so happens that there is a new documentary called When Comedy Went to School, in which co-directors Ron Frank and Mevlut Akaaya tackle the age-old question: Why are there so many Jewish comedians? Apparently, back in 1970, a survey found that while Jews only comprised 3% of the total U.S. population, they accounted for 80% of the professional comics working at the time. Who better to ask than some Jewish comedians? Robert Klein narrates, providing some historical context (my Jewish grandfather emigrated from Russia to escape Tsar Nicholas’ pogroms, so I wasn’t too surprised by the filmmaker’s revelation that it can all be traced back to the shtetls of Eastern Europe).

Unfortunately, after a perfunctory nod to Vaudeville, Frank and Akaaya kind of drop the ball as per any further parsing of the symbiotic evolution of the Jewish-American experience with the development of modern comedy, instead leaning on the old shtick of parading veteran Borscht Belt comics like Jerry Lewis, Sid Caesar, Jerry Stiller, Mort Sahl and Jackie Mason in front of the cameras to swap war stories about the halcyon days of the Catskill resorts (which is where, the filmmakers posit, comedy “went to school”).

There is some fun vintage performance footage (Totie Fields! Buddy Hackett!), and an overall genial tone to the affair that makes it hard not to like on a casual level, but the film is ultimately a somewhat superficial affair (and c’mon guys…a slow motion montage of performers synched to ”Send in the Clowns”…again?). It is very similar in presentation and tone to the 2009 PBS mini-series Make ‘Em Laugh: The Funny Business Of America of America; and at a short 76 minutes, it somehow feels destined for the teevee.














OK, so that didn’t work for me, what to watch this weekend? Keeping with the theme, I thought I’d offer my “Top 5” picks for the best films about the business of funny. Enjoy!

Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work-“Do you want to know what ‘fear’ looks like?” exclaims Joan Rivers, pointing to a blank page in her weekly planner, “THAT is what ‘fear’ looks like.” Later, she laments “This (show) business is all about rejection.” Any aspiring stand-ups out there need to heed those words of wisdom (and I will back her up on this). Fear and rejection-that’s the reality of stand-up comedy. One could also take away much inspiration from Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg’s engaging “one year in the life” portrait of the plucky, riotously profane 75 year-old, as she rushes from nightclub and casino gigs to TV tapings, taking meetings and sweating over the writing and production of her one-woman stage play. The film also reviews her rollercoaster career, from Borscht Belt beginnings to anointment (and infamously, subsequent blackballing) by Johnny Carson, then slowly back up to middling. What emerges is a portrait of a performer who is still working her ass off, putting people 1/3 her age to shame with her fierce drive to succeed.

The King of Comedy– Jerry Langford (Jerry Lewis) is an urbane, intensely private man by day, and a wildly successful TV talk show host by night. Rupert Pupkin (Robert De Niro) is a boorish, pushy autograph hound by day and an aspiring stand-up comic by night (in his mother’s basement). Rupert dreams of getting his big “break” on Jerry’s show. When his demo tape fails to land him an audition, an increasingly delusional Rupert attempts to ingratiate himself by stalking his idol. This does not set well, leaving the desperately fame-hungry Rupert only one option: kidnap Jerry and demand a spot on his show as ransom. The outstanding direction from Martin Scorsese, sharp screenplay by Paul D. Zimmerman, and top-notch performances bolster a dark satire about the ups and downs of the show-biz ladder (as well as our unhealthy obsession with celebrity culture).

Lenny– Directed by Bob Fosse, adapted by Julian Barry from his own play and shot in gorgeous B&W by DP Bruce Surtees, this 1974 biopic is an idiosyncratic yet ultimately illuminating look at the life and legacy of groundbreaking “dirty” comic Lenny Bruce, brilliantly portrayed by Dustin Hoffman. Don’t expect a hagiography; Fosse is not shy about taking side trips from the faux-documentary framework to revel in the seedier elements of Bruce’s personal life, especially his heroin addiction and dysfunctional marriage to a stripper (Valerie Perrine, in a heartbreaking performance that earned her an Oscar nomination and a Best Actress win at Cannes). Hoffman’s transformation from the fresh-faced, “anything for a laugh” show biz up-and-comer to the puffy-faced, embittered junkie who spent the waning days of his career burning up stage time to recite transcripts from his obscenity trials and rant against his persecutors is nothing short of extraordinary.   

Mickey One– Warren Beatty is a comic who is on the run from the mob. The reasons are never made clear, but one thing is for certain: the viewer will find him or herself becoming as unsettled as the twitchy, paranoid protagonist. It’s a Kafkaesque nightmare, with echoes of Godard’s Breathless . A true rarity-an American art film, photographed in expressive, moody chiaroscuro by DP Ghislain Cloquet (who also did the cinematography for Bresson’s Au Hasard Balthazar and Woody Allen’s Love and Death). Directed by Arthur Penn, who also teamed up with Beatty for Bonnie and Clyde .

Tall Guy– Whether it slipped under the public’s radar or was poorly marketed is up for debate, but this underrated gem is the stuff cult films are made of. Jeff Goldblum is an American actor working on the London stage, who is love struck by a nurse (Emma Thompson). Rowan Atkinson is a hoot as Goldblum’s employer, a stage comic beloved by his audience but known as a backstage terror to fellow cast members and crew. The most hilariously choreographed lovemaking scene ever put on film is worth the price of admission, but a stage musical version of Elephant Man, The (mercilessly skewering Andrew Lloyd Webber) literally had me rolling on the floor. Actor-comedian Mel Smith directs with a mix of high-brow/low-brow cleverness and vulgarity that somehow works.

Previous posts with related themes:

Tracking the “most dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country”

Tracking the “most dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country”

by digby

It’s the perfect day to remind everyone of this:

Hoping to prove the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was under the influence of Communists, the FBI kept the civil rights leader under constant surveillance.

The agency’s hidden tape recorders turned up almost nothing about communism.

But they did reveal embarrassing details about King’s sex life — details the FBI was able to use against him.

The almost fanatical zeal with which the FBI pursued King is disclosed in tens of thousands of FBI memos from the 1960s.

The FBI paper trail spells out in detail the government agency’s concerted efforts to derail King’s efforts on behalf of the civil rights movement.

The FBI’s interest in King intensified after the March on Washington in August 1963, when King delivered his “I have a dream speech,” which many historians consider the most important speech of the 20th century. After the speech, an FBI memo called King the “most dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country.”

The bureau convened a meeting of department heads to “explore how best to carry on our investigation [of King] to produce the desired results without embarrassment to the Bureau,” which included “a complete analysis of the avenues of approach aimed at neutralizing King as an effective Negro leader.”

The FBI began secretly tracking King’s flights and watching his associates. In July 1963, a month before the March on Washington, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover filed a request with Attorney General Robert Kennedy to tap King’s and his associates’ phones and to bug their homes and offices.

In September, Kennedy consented to the technical surveillance. Kennedy gave the FBI permission to break into King’s office and home to install the bugs, as long as agents recognized the “delicacy of this particular matter” and didn’t get caught installing them. Kennedy added a proviso — he wanted to be personally informed of any pertinent information.

While King did have associates who had been members of the Communist Party, by all accounts they severed those ties when they started working in the civil rights movement. What’s more, the FBI bugs never picked up evidence that King himself was a Communist, or was interested in toeing the party line.

But the long list of bugs in his hotel rooms picked up just enough about King’s love life.

And yes, it was our Democratic Party heroes, John and Robert Kennedy who agreed to it. I’m sure they felt it was necessary at the time. Powerful politicians almost always do.

But not to worry. I’m sure they’ll never do anything like that again.

.

Democrats can appeal to emotion too if they choose to

Democrats can appeal to emotion too if they choose to

by digby

Read and learn Democrats: if you want to defend Obamacare — government social insurance in general — this is how you do it:

The excitement at the Kentucky Farm Bureau Country Ham Breakfast is usually over how high the bids will go when a ham is auctioned. But this year, it came when Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear made an emotional case for the Affordable Care Act as a chance to change his state’s long history of poor health.

It was not what anyone expected—least of all Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul, who sat stone-faced onstage with Beshear as he unloaded on them without using names.
Thus did the 50th annual ham breakfast at the state fair become a showcase for national divisions and passions, with some 1,600 diners as witnesses.

The mayor of Louisville, Democrat Greg Fischer, set a light mood with a brag-fest about his city’s food and restaurant scene and the nearby farmers who have helped make Louisville “the national leader” in the local food movement, “on all the right lists” from Zagat to Southern Living.

But within moments the breakfast crowd found themselves watching a heated Obamacare debate—the kind that normally goes on in Washington, not at Kentucky agricultural events.

Beshear was the homespun populist, appealing to people’s instincts to want the best for their friends, relatives, and neighbors. The senators, surprised by the full-bore politics, struck back at the expense of the health law and its impact on business. Those were familiar arguments made by the many vocal opponents of the law, strengthened this week here by UPS’s announcement that it was eliminating coverage for spouses who could be expected to get or buy coverage Jan. 1 under ACA.

Beshear’s advocacy, by contrast, was striking in its intensity and in how personally he approached the issue, picking up on the idea that many people who don’t have health insurance are embarrassed by that and don’t talk about it.

The governor compared health insurance to “the safety net of crop insurance” and said farmers need both. He said 640,000 Kentuckians—15 percent of the state—don’t have health insurance and “trust me, you know many of those 640,000 people. You’re friends with them. You’re probably related to them. Some may be your sons and daughters. You go to church with them. Shop with them. Help them harvest their fields. Sit in the stands with them as you watch your kids play football or basketball or ride a horse in competition. Heck, you may even be one of them.”

Beshear went on to say that “it’s no fun” hoping and praying you don’t get sick, or choosing whether to pay for food or medicine. He also said Kentucky is at or near the top of the charts on bad-health indicators, including heart disease, diabetes, cancer deaths, and preventable hospitalizations. He said all that affects everything from productivity and school attendance to health costs and the state’s image.

“We’ve ranked that bad for a long, long time,” he said. “The Affordable Care Act is our historic opportunity to address this weakness and to change the course of the future of the commonwealth. We’re going to make insurance available for the very first time in our history to every single citizen of the commonwealth of Kentucky.”

About half the audience burst into applause at that point while the other half sat on their hands. But he wasn’t done. He cited a study that showed the law would inject about $15.6 billion into the Kentucky economy over eight years, create 17,000 new jobs, and generate $802 million for the state budget.

“It’s amazing to me how people who are pouring time and money and energy into trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act sure haven’t put that kind of energy into trying to improve the health of Kentuckians. And think of the decades that they have had to make some kind of difference,” Beshear finished pointedly.

McConnell and Paul whined about how this meet n greet wasn’t supposed to be about health care and then Mitch complained about UPS firing a bunch of people and Rand spouted some mumbo jumbo about the Federal Reserve. I’m sure their most hardcore followers were very impressed.

But there are whole lot of Kentuckians I’m going to assume are decent human beings who don’t care as much about “bending the cost curve” or rewarding “the producers” as they do about their family, friends and neighbors going without health care. And I’d imagine some of them are even smart enough to know that they themselves are only one job loss away from losing their own health insurance. They know this. It’s political leaders’ jobs to acknowledge this publicly in terms that make it clear this is a moral issue — and invite people to share their values.

McConnell and Paul and their ilk have to make abstract arguments about how high taxes affect rich people and so you can’t get a job or that the Fed’s monetary policy is too loose and we need to go back to the gold standard, all of which is cold and distant. Their emotional appeals have to be uttered by the noise machine (or Steve King) because they are based on resentment and racial hatred and that’s not something a politician can just come right out and do anymore.

It’s one of the Democrats’ advantages in national politics that their politicians can speak openly in emotional language that resonates and the Republicans have to leave their emotional appeals to Rush Limbaugh. It’s just odd that they don’t use it more often.

.

It doesn’t happen a lot but often enough that there’s a word for it

It doesn’t happen a lot but often enough that there’s a word for it

by digby

Juan Cole:

We have HUMINT, or human intelligence gathered from agents. We have SIGINT or signals intelligence. And now we have LOVEINT or NSA analysts occasionally reading the emails of ex-lovers. It doesn’t happen a lot, the NSA told the WSJ, but often enough that there is a word for it.

There’s another violation we all heard about way back in 2009 but which doesn’t appear to be of much concern to anyone.

I wonder if it’s called GOPINT:

He said he and other analysts were trained to use a secret database, code-named Pinwale, in 2005 that archived foreign and domestic e-mail messages. He said Pinwale allowed N.S.A. analysts to read large volumes of e-mail messages to and from Americans as long as they fell within certain limits — no more than 30 percent of any database search, he recalled being told — and Americans were not explicitly singled out in the searches.

The former analyst added that his instructors had warned against committing any abuses, telling his class that another analyst had been investigated because he had improperly accessed the personal e-mail of former President Bill Clinton.

Yeah, I’m very sure sure it only happened that one time. The NSA and Dianne Feinstein assured us that it hardly ever happens. After they told us that it never happened at all. For years.

.