Skip to content

Month: October 2013

Yes, New Democrat dogma is to blame

Yes, New Democrat dogma is to blame

by digby

Mike Konczal has written a provocative post that is getting quite a bit of play today and is well worth reading. He posits that the rough Obamacare rollout is a direct consequence of misplaced faith in neo-liberal solutions, which he defines in this instance as a reliance on means testing, privatization, devolution to the states, all in the pursuit of “choice” and “competition” as the best ways to provide services at an affordable choice. He contrasts that with the New Deal style programs which are universal, federal government run programs:

Conservatives in particular think this website has broad implications for liberalism as a philosophical and political project. I think it does, but for the exact opposite reasons: it highlights the problems inherent in the move to a neoliberal form of a governance and social insurance, while demonstrating the superiorities in the older, New Deal form of liberalism. This point is floating out there, and it turns out to be a major problem for conservatives as well, so let’s make it clear and explicit here.

He goes on to discuss the issues in depth and concludes:

Some of the more cartoony conservatives argue that this is a failure of liberalism because it is a failure of government planning, evidently confusing the concept of economic “central planning” with “the government makes a plan to do something.”

However, the smarter conservatives who are thinking several moves ahead (e.g. Ross Douthat) understand that this failed rollout is a significant problem for conservatives. Because if all the problems are driven by means-testing, state-level decisions and privatization of social insurance, the fact that the core conservative plan for social insurance is focused like a laser beam on means-testing, block-granting and privatization is a rather large problem. As Ezra Klein notes, “Paul Ryan’s health-care plan — and his Medicare plan — would also require the government to run online insurance marketplaces.” Additionally, the Medicaid expansion is working well where it is being implemented, and the ACA is perhaps even bending the cost curve of Medicare, the two paths forward that conservatives don’t want to take.

I find this particularly fascinating since over the years I’ve written quite a bit about my own evolution from mainstream 70s liberal to being willing to experiment with New Dem ideas and back again. Back in the late 80s and early 90s all this neo-liberal talk sounded promising, particularly since it was clear to me that the Republicans had convinced the nation, as Barack Obama admiringly said two decades later that “all the excesses of the 1960s and 1970s and government had grown and grown but there wasn’t much sense of accountability in terms of how it was operating” and so they wanted “that sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing.”

For a time I was willing to entertain the idea that we might be able to attain progressive goals with “market” oriented processes but it didn’t take me long to realize that it was all just an excuse for rich people to keep more of their money (as usual.) Unfortunately, the Democratic Party bought into it heavily, some of it due to the proliferation of big money in politics and the necessity of getting their hands on it to compete. But I think generally they have thought it was a good idea on the merits for the past two decades. Certainly, they have been unwilling to publicly back anything that smacks of traditional welfare state programs.

This all has its roots in “the best and the brightest” fetish in the 1960s when John F. Kennedy called in the smart industry guys with pocket protectors to run his administration. I suppose it is, therefore, no surprise that Bill Clinton would be the neo-liberal hero of the modern era. Here’s how he defined the New Democrat philosophy back in 1992:

In the global economy of the 1990s, economic growth won’t come from government spending. It will come instead from individuals working smarter and learning more, from entrepreneurs taking more risks and going after new markets, and from corporations designing better products and taking a longer view…

Too many Washington insiders of both parties think the only way to provide more services is to spend more on programs already on the books in education, housing, and health care. But if we reinvent government to deliver new services in different ways, eliminate unnecessary layers of management, and offer people more choices, we really can give taxpayers more services with fewer bureaucrats for the same or less money.

That sounded very nice, but I don’t think anybody ever really understood exactly why this was a superior way to accomplish liberal goals. Here’s my favorite example of an elite New Democrat’s explanation of why we should “reform” Social Security. It’s Joe Klein:

Government was, and very much still remains, the last of our major institutions that stuck in the Industrial Age, where the paradigm is top-down, centralized command and control, assembly line, standardization, and one size fits all.

In the Information Age, Clinton knew that the paradigm was the computer, that the government had to be more decentralized, that bureaucracies had to become more flexible, and that our social safety net had to reflect that–the fact that people had more information and have to have more choices about where they get their health care, where their money for their retirement is held, and so on.

He just asserts that people must need more choices about where their retirement money is held and where they get their health care because the world is now like a computer. I don’t know why. And considering what we’re currently going through with the Obamacare web-site rollout, that statement is more hilariously absurd than ever.

Matt Yglesias caught Joe Klein making similar statements some years later:

Josh Marshall wonders about Joe Klein’s contention on Meet The Press that “private accounts [are] a terrific policy and that in the information age, you’re going to need different kinds of structures in the entitlement area than you had in the industrial age.” Josh wants to know “if anyone knows of an example where he explains this argument.” To make a long story short, I don’t believe that he has. Nexising for “industrial age” or “information age” and Social Security you get a few repetitions of the meme, but nothing one would call an argument. The closest you get is his February 6 column “The Incredible Shrinking Democrats” which states:

There is, then, a profitable discussion to be had between ‘ownership’ Republicans and ‘third-way’ Democrats about transforming the stagnant bureaucracies of the Industrial Age.

To Klein, then, the problem with Social Security is that it’s mired in stagnant bureacracy. Needless to say, Social Security’s associated bureacracy is, in fact, very small compared to the (large) overall scale of the program. Much smaller, in fact, than the administrative costs that would be entailed by the information age alternative of private accounts. In a September 22, 2003 column, Klein dismissed Dick Gephardt’s attack on Howard Dean’s past support for raising the retirement age as “an utterly transparent industrial age process, like a steam locomotive creaking out of a station.”

I’ll be rude and quote myself here:

Klein’s DLC catechism has all the markings of someone who jumped on a sexy trend when he was younger and hasn’t realized the fashion has changed. There is no there there. He’s like one of those e-venture capitalists of the late 90’s spewing fast talking bullshit about “new organizational paradigms where knowledge is defined in terms of potential for action as distinguished from information and its more intimate link with performance.” In other words, gibberish.

Unfortunately, it was much more than just a sexy trend. It became an article of faith in the Democratic Party. This faith in complex technocratic designs for the sake of technocratic design and our insistence on kludgeocracy just because has always been a mistake. Most of us saw that pretty early on (and certainly predicted that there would be no political advantage to it) but the Democratic Party has adopted this view so fully that very few people even notice what it is anymore.  And it must be said that as with so many of our current problems, there is a lot of money to be made in privatization, out-sourcing, devolution and the like. The incentives are obvious.

Konczal predicts that this argument about neo-liberal governance is going to characterize much of the debate in the next decade. All I can say is, “it’s about time.”

.

I’m sure the feeling was mutual

I’m sure the feeling was mutual

by digby

… but the president has enough class not to say it out loud:

“In a ‘negotiation’ meeting with the president, one GOP House Leader told the president: ‘I cannot even stand to look at you.'”

— Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL)

I am, once again, impressed by the right’s civility. We on the left really should be more careful with our rhetoric.

.

Can the oceans be saved?

Can the oceans be saved?

by digby

The other day I wrote about the overfishing and massive garbage dumping that’s killing our ocean. And the depressing fact that the amount of fuel used to clean them up will apparently be more destructive to the environment than dong nothing.

Well, out of the fertile minds of babes:

A Dutch teenager has invented a device that he claims could clean up some 20 billion tonnes of plastic waste from the world’s oceans.

Boyan Slat, 19, came up with the idea of a series of floating booms and processing platforms designed to collect floating plastic rubbish.

The ‘ocean cleanup’ concept is designed to capture the floating plastic but allow life like fish and plankton to pass through unharmed, while saving the waste materials to be recycled.

The engineering student believes that once operational, his device could dramatically reduce the amount of rubbish in the oceans in just five years time.

Millions of tonnes of plastic debris are littering oceans and have accumulated in areas of high concentration called gyres – which are essentially floating rubbish tips.

While he believes humans must end their reliance on disposable plastic items and manage waste responsibly, his innovation could make a big difference to the cleanliness of oceans in the shorter-term.

He proposes fixing sea water processors to the sea bed, which are also attached to the floating platform so that the water can move through them and generate energy.

His concept also includes using floating booms instead of nets to cover vast areas of water effectively, while no mesh and a very low speed, means there will be ‘virtually no by-catch’ and unfortunate animals getting tangled in nets that are meant to help conserve their habitat. read on …

I know nothing of this sort of technology so perhaps it’s totally ridiculous. But it sure sounds good.

.

Ted Cruz, King of the Seventh Mountain, by @DavidOAtkins

Ted Cruz, King of the Seventh Mountain

by David Atkins

This is what Ted Cruz was born to do:

In a sermon last year at an Irving, Texas, megachurch that helped elect Ted Cruz to the United States Senate, Cruz’ father Rafael Cruz indicated that his son was among the evangelical Christians who are anointed as “kings” to take control of all sectors of society, an agenda commonly referred to as the “Seven Mountains” mandate, and “bring the spoils of war to the priests”, thus helping to bring about a prophesied “great transfer of wealth”, from the “wicked” to righteous gentile believers. link to video of Rafael Cruz describing the “great transfer of wealth” and the role of anointed “kings” in various sectors of society, including government, who are to “bring the spoils of war to the priests”.

Rafael Cruz’ dominionist sermon given August 26, 2012, at the New Beginnings Church of pastor Larry Huch, in Irving, Texas has already received considerable scrutiny due to an excellent Huffington Post commentary by Methodist Associate Pastor Morgan Guyton, who noted the explicitly dominionist nature of pastor Cruz’ sermon, which concerned the divine mandate for believers, with anointing of “kings” in their respective spheres, to take control over all sectors of society.

Cruz spoke of “Kings who are anointed to go to war, win the war, and bring the spoils of war to the priests.”

Discussion of the now-notorious speech by Rafael Cruz has missed the fact that Ted Cruz was subsequently blessed and anointed by prominent dominionist pastors, in effect as a “king” in the political/governmental sphere, at a special blessing ceremony at the Marriott Hotel in Des Moines, Iowa, at a July 19th-20th 2013 rally designed to draw pastors into politics.

In case you don’t know what this is all about, here it is from their own mouths:

In 1975 Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade,
and Loren Cunningham, founder of Youth With a Mission,
had lunch together.

God simultaneously gave each of them a message to give to the other: “The culture is shaped by seven mind-molders or mountains in society. If we can influence each of these areas for Christ, we will win the culture of our nation.”

These 7 mountains are:

Media Mountain
Government Mountain
Education Mountain
Business Mountain
Church Mountain
Arts and Entertainment Mountain
Family Mountain

These 7 mountains will influence our culture. At the top of each mountain is a principal, controlling party (we call them mind molders). These mind molders are either governed by God’s principals or they are governed by darkness and satan. Right now in your city, these 7 mountains are under the control of satan and his kingdom…but that is about to change.
How did this happen?

This has happened because we have limited the Gospel of Salvation to forgiveness of sins only, and not the transforming of nations. By doing this, we’ve reduced our relationship with God as our savior for all things. Somehow, over time, we have allowed God to get pushed out of these 7 areas, we’ve lost the revelation that:

as ‘King of Kings’…. He is the Lord of government
as ‘The Great Teacher’…. He is Lord of education
as ‘Johovah Jira’…. He is our provider and Lord of business
as ‘The Living Word’…. He is Lord of all media
as ‘The Potter/Gardener/Architect’…. He is Lord of all arts and entertainment
as ‘The Father’…. He is Lord of the family
as ‘The Messiah or Lord of Lords’…. He is Lord of the Church However, there is great news.

God is our savior for everything and that is a wonderful revelation. It is time to not only invite God back into these 7 mountains, but it is time to put Him in charge of them. All it takes is the willingness of each of us to step up and make it happen.

Retake Your City is calling on you to make the decision that you have had enough, and that God has been removed for too long from our culture. Accept the calling God has on your life in whatever area He has called you. Decide that God will no longer take a back seat but instead, will be the driver. If you are ready to step up, if you are ready to go to battle for Jesus then start today.

They’re on a mission from God to anoint their King of America and take the money away from you moocher heathens and give to the righteous producers of salvation.

But that’s OK. I’m sure that if Obama just “leads” more, he can convince these people to put country first and do right by the downtrodden and uninsured. He just needs to host a few more cocktail parties or something.

.

Moment of zen: Jan Brewer junior

Moment of zen

by digby

Move over, Jan Brewer this lady’s stealing your act:

Meet Christine Jones, Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate. She’s got a strong conservative streak, some trouble with geography, and apparently a desire to sing her way to the governor’s office.

All of this was on display Wednesday night when the deep-pocketed former executive of the internet company GoDaddy serenaded the audience at a charity event for Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio (R). Jones, who could play a major role in the 2014 GOP primary, told the crowd she has been trying to win the sheriff’s support.

In addition to her song, a tune from the musical “Wicked” that at one point she forgot the lyrics to, Jones managed to make an eyebrow-raising comment about Arpaio, who was recently slapped with by a federal judge over his treatment of immigrants.

“It turns out that [Arpaio] does a lot of cool stuff that nobody knows about,” Jones said at one point. “Do you know this guy goes down into the desert and puts out water so people won’t die coming across the Rio Grande?”

The Rio Grande flows through Colorado, New Mexico and Texas. Officials for Arpaio’s office said they had no knowledge of Arpaio ever putting water in the desert for people, according to Phoenix TV station KTVK, which broadcasted Jones’ remarks.

In a separate interview, Jones was also asked about some of the hardline anti-illegal immigration policies that Arpaio prides himself on. In particular, KTVK asked Jones about the immigration sweeps by Arpaio’s office, where deputies question people’s citizenship status, even if they are stopped over a minor traffic violation.

“I honestly don’t know about somebody pulling somebody over or targeting particular people,” Jones said.

She also told KTVK she did not think Arpaio was a racist because most of his deputies were Hispanic.

“You might think he’s a racist, but he’s not. He actually has a majority of his officers that are of Hispanic decent,” Jones told KTVK.

She seems smart.

.

Headline ‘O the Day: Tax breaks could soften blow of JPMorgan deal

Headline ‘O the Day: Tax breaks could soften blow of JPMorgan deal

by digby

Hahahahaha:

JPMorgan Chase has struck a tentative deal with the Justice Department to pay a record $13 billion over dodgy mortgage products — but the biggest U.S. bank may be able to slash that bill by paying Uncle Sam less in taxes.

Details of the pact are now being finalized, but it is expected to include $9 billion paid to the government and $4 billion in relief for wronged customers.

The silver lining for JPMorgan: The bank will likely be able to write off a good chunk of those funds by calling them business expenses, tax experts said.

Section 162(f) of the tax code bars deductions for fines and penalties paid to the government, but JPMorgan might be able to negotiate an agreement to classify the payments as something else. Those payments labeled compensatory or for restitution are more likely to be deductible.

“These are big numbers,” said Alan Feld, a law professor at Boston University. “I’m not sure that I as a taxpayer am so happy about helping JPMorgan to pay.”

Huh? People didn’t think JP Morgan was going to lose all that money, did they? How silly.

One might make the argument that this is one of the reasons why jail time is a better form of punishment. But that would be silly too.

.

Go ahead and spark up. Nobody cares.

Go ahead and spark up. Nobody cares.

by digby

The times they are a changin’

For the first time, more than half of Americans think that marijuana usage should be made legal, according to a Gallup poll released Tuesday.

Fifty-eight percent of Americans now back legalizing marijuana. That represents an 8-point increase from the previous record of 50 percent in 2011, and a 10-point increase from November 2012, just after Colorado and Washington voted for legalization.
[…]
Much of the new support for legalization comes among independent voters, 62 percent of whom now support it, up from just 50 percent last November. Majorities of all age groups up to age 64 also support legalization, including two-thirds of those from 18 to 29.

Since most of us under the age of 64 have tried it have lived to tell the tale — (spoiler alert — it’s no big deal) it makes sense that the country is finally coming to its senses. The question now is whether the governments that are making a tidy profit at prohibition will go quietly.

.

More shutdown fallout: McAuliffe 50, Cuccinelli 33

More shutdown fallout: McAuliffe 50, Cuccinelli 33

by David Atkins

The evidence is coming in stronger and stronger that the shutdown is really hurting the GOP. Right-leaning Rasmussen has some fairly amazing poll numbers on the Virginia governor’s race:

Democrat Terry McAuliffe has jumped to a 17-point lead over Republican Ken Cuccinelli in the Virginia gubernatorial race following the federal government shutdown that hit Northern Virginia hard and Hillary Clinton’s weekend visit to the state.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Virginia Voters finds McAuliffe with 50% support to Cuccinelli’s 33%. Libertarian candidate Robert Sarvis is a distant third with eight percent (8%) of the vote. Three percent (3%) like some other candidate, while five percent (5%) remain undecided.

Granted, Cuccinelli is a noted loon, he’s being outspent heavily, and Virginia is particularly susceptible to anger over a federal government shutdown.

That said, Terry McAuliffe isn’t exactly the most attractive candidate, either, and he’s practically a symbolic embodiment of establishment Washington. If the shutdown were creating a universal distaste for Washington establishment politicians and a craving for straight-talking outsiders (as many in the media are suggesting), then Cuccinelli should be doing much better.

But no. It appears that the shutdown fiasco is almost unilaterally hurting conservatives and Republicans at this point.

And that’s as it should be.

.

Oh no, somebody was rude to the Tea Party

Oh no, somebody was rude to the Tea Party

by digby

So I hear that people are upset with Alan Grayson for characterizing the Tea Party as racist and comparing it to the KKK. It’s very rude, dontcha know, to compare a far right group of the present to another far right group of the past and especially the Tea Party who’ve never shown the slightest bit of racist behavior that might make the comparison apt.

Well, not much:

I’m sure people will shriek that the Tea Party is not a violent group and so just because they show a teensy bit of racial intolerance there’s no reason to compare them to a violent group like the KKK for goodness sakes. So, I hesitate to mention this because it’s so very impolite, but there’s actually been quite a bit of right wing violence in recent years, much of which is based on the kind of slogans and rhetoric you commonly see and hear at Tea Party rallies.  This list is incomplete and only goes up to 2011, but it gives a pretty good picture of what’s been going on:

— July 2008A gunman named Jim David Adkisson, agitated at how “liberals” are “destroying America,” walks into a Unitarian Church and opens fire, killing two churchgoers and wounding four others. 

— October 2008Two neo-Nazis are arrested in Tennessee in a plot to murder dozens of African-Americans, culminating in the assassination of President Obama. 

— December 2008: A pair of “Patriot” movement radicals — the father-son team of Bruce and Joshua Turnidge, who wanted “to attack the political infrastructure” — threaten a bank in Woodburn, Oregon, with a bomb in the hopes of extorting money that would end their financial difficulties, for which they blamed the government. Instead, the bomb goes off and kills two police officers. The men eventually are convicted and sentenced to death for the crime

— December 2008In Belfast, Maine, police discover the makings of a nuclear “dirty bomb” in the basement of a white supremacist shot dead by his wife. The man, who was independently wealthy, reportedly was agitated about the election of President Obama and was crafting a plan to set off the bomb. 

— January 2009A white supremacist named Keith Luke embarks on a killing rampagein Brockton, Mass., raping and wounding a black woman and killing her sister, then killing a homeless man before being captured by police as he is en route to a Jewish community center. 

— February 2009: A Marine named Kody Brittingham is arrested and charged with plotting to assassinate President Obama. Brittingham also collected white-supremacist material. 

— February 2009: A 60-year-old former Republican Party campaign volunteer opens fire on a gathering of Chilena exchange students in an apartment complex in Miramar Beach, Fla., after telling a neighbor he wanted to start a “revolution” against Latino immigrants. 

— April 2009A white supremacist named Richard Poplawski opens fire on three Pittsburgh police officers who come to his house on a domestic-violence call and kills all three, because he believed President Obama intended to take away the guns of white citizens like himself. Poplawski is currently awaiting trial. 

— April 2009Another gunman in Okaloosa County, Florida, similarly fearful of Obama’s purported gun-grabbing plans, kills two deputies when they come to arrest him in a domestic-violence matter, then is killed himself in a shootout with police. 

— May 2009A “sovereign citizen” named Scott Roeder walks into a church in Wichita, Kansas, and assassinates abortion provider Dr. George Tiller. 

— June 2009: A Holocaust denier and right-wing tax protester named James Von Brunn opens fire at the Holocaust Museum, killing a security guard. 

— February 2010An angry tax protester named Joseph Ray Stack flies an airplane into the building housing IRS offices in Austin, Texas. (Media are reluctant to label this one “domestic terrorism” too.

— March 2010Seven militiamen from the Hutaree Militia in Michigan and Ohio are arrested and charged with plotting to assassinate local police officers with the intent of sparking a new civil war. 

— March 2010An anti-government extremist named John Patrick Bedell walks into the Pentagon and opens fire, wounding two officers before he is himself shot dead. 

— May 2010A “sovereign citizen” from Georgia is arrested in Tennessee and charged with plotting the violent takeover of a local county courthouse. 

— May 2010A still-unidentified white man walks into a Jacksonville, Fla., mosque and sets it afire, simultaneously setting off a pipe bomb. 

— May 2010Two “sovereign citizens” named Jerry and Joe Kane gun down two police officers who pull them over for a traffic violation, and then wound two more officers in a shootout in which both of them are eventually killed. 

— July 2010An agitated right-winger and convict named Byron Williams loads up on weapons and drives to the Bay Area intent on attacking the offices of the Tides Foundation and the ACLU, but is intercepted by state patrolmen and engages them in a shootout and armed standoff in which two officers and Williams are wounded. 

— September 2010: A Concord, N.C., man is arrested and charged with plotting to blow up a North Carolina abortion clinic. The man, 26-year–old Justin Carl Moose, referred to himself as the “Christian counterpart to (Osama) bin Laden” in a taped undercover meeting with a federal informant. 

— January 2011: A 22-year-old gunman named Jared Lee Loughner with a long grudge against Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and a paranoid hatred of the government walks into a public Giffords event and shoots her in the head, then keeps firing, killing six people and wounding 14 more. Gifford miraculously survives. 

— January 2011: A backpack bomb with the potential of killing or injuring dozens of people is found along the route of a Martin Luther King Day “unity march” in downtown Spokane. 

— January 31, 2011: An Army veteran from California with a previous arrest record for making threats against President Bush is arrested for making terrorist outside a mosque in Michigan inside a car whose trunk was filled with Class C explosives. 

— March 2011: Five people in the Fairbanks area are arrested on charges of plotting to kidnap or kill state troopers and a Fairbanks judge. All five are self-proclaimed “sovereign citizens,” including local militia leader Schaeffer Cox. 

— March 2011: A man from Madera, CA, named Donny Eugene Mower is arrested for the firebombing of a Planned Parenthood clinic and the vandalization of a local Islamic religious center. The crimes were committed in the name of Mower’s one-man hate group, the American Nationalist Brotherhood. His ‘manifesto’ asked: ‘Isn’t it time that someone hit back?’

Tea Partiers will say they have nothing to do with any of that. But they do have quite a history of welcoming individuals and members of groups that espouse violence to the stage with them. This report documented Tea Party rallies featuring violent right wing extremists in their midst.

So yeah, the Tea Party isn’t violent like the KKK. It just has a tremendous tolerance for people who are.

Look, it’s always been considered incendiary to call it like it is when it comes to the Tea Party. For some reason, despite the clear evidence that they are a revanchist, white minority that sees its hold on political and cultural power slipping away (and is deeply offended by the election of an African American to the presidency) liberals start screaming “ACORN” and hide under the bed whenever anyone has the temerity to bring it up. I guess they think it’s morally wrong to point out how the Tea Party movement tracks with America’s long history with white supremacy. But it doesn’t change the fact that it does.

Update: Here you have a bunch of villagers saying that what Grayson said was “wrong”.

And yet he’s right.  Here’s a Confederate flag flying at the anti-Obamacare Tea Party rally just last week:

I’m sure all those Tea partiers asked those who were flying such flags in front of the White House to please put them away right after that picture was taken. They would never stand for anything that looks like it might be racist.

Here’s featured speaker Larry Klayman, who spoke along with Tea Party politicians Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Mike Lee and former Governor Sarah Palin:

“We are now ruled by a President who bows down to Allah…this President is not a President of “we the people.” He’s the President of his people. He needs to be the President of all of us….I call upon all of you to wage a second American nonviolent revolution– To use civil disobedience, and to demand that this President leave town–to get out, to put the Quran down, to get up off his knees, and to figuratively come up with his hands up.“

Well, he did say “non-violent” and “figuratively” so he’s not really comparable to someone who is calling for violence. Certainly the sorts who fly confederate flags and carry guns everywhere and think the government is communist because it wants people to have affordable health insurance would never take such words the wrong way.

The Tea Party is extremist. Calling the Tea Party what it is, is not extremist. But by all means, liberals, clutch your pearls and start screaming “Betrayus” because it’s always gotten you so very far before.

.

QOTD: Pope Francis

QOTD: Pope Francis

by digby

I think he just threw down the gauntlet at certain Catholics who seem to have confused religion and politics.

“The faith passes, so to speak, through a distiller and becomes ideology. And ideology does not beckon [people]. In ideologies there is not Jesus: in his tenderness, his love, his meekness. And ideologies are rigid, always. Of every sign: rigid.

“And when a Christian becomes a disciple of the ideology, he has lost the faith: he is no longer a disciple of Jesus, he is a disciple of this attitude of thought… For this reason Jesus said to them: ‘You have taken away the key of knowledge.’ The knowledge of Jesus is transformed into an ideological and also moralistic knowledge, because these close the door with many requirements.”

“The faith becomes ideology and ideology frightens, ideology chases away the people, distances, distances the people and distances of the Church of the people. But it is a serious illness, this of ideological Christians. It is an illness, but it is not new, eh?”

Yo, Bill Donohue? UCCB? You listening?

.