Skip to content

Month: December 2013

Bad news for the GOP and possible good news for average Americans

Bad news for the GOP and possible good news for average Americans

by digby

who just happen to be out of work:

House Republicans, including Speaker John Boehner, face a sharp backlash from voters for pushing a budget deal that denies the extension of unemployment benefits for 1.3 million Americans past Dec. 28, according to a collection of polls being released Monday.

In Boehner’s Ohio district, for example, 63 percent of voters support extending the benefits, 34 percent don’t. As part of the budget compromise and at the urging of the GOP, the benefits were not extended.

In his district, according to the Democratic poll firm PPP, just 31 percent are more likely to vote to re-elect Boehner, while 33 wouldn’t. The same poll finds that Boehner’s approval ratings are upside down: 40 percent approve, 50 percent disapprove. The sample of Republicans in the poll was 42 percent, Democrats 28 percent, and independents 31 percent.

It’s hard to know for sure if Boehner’s unpopular because he’s seen as a sell-out by the Tea partiers or if he’s unpopular because he’s acting like Ebenezer Scrooge on steroids. But the good news for Real Americans is that this might just mean the congress will come back and pass a UI extension. These numbers are pretty clear. The public does not like the idea of cutting people off when there are no jobs. gee, it turns out that the majority of Americans aren’t complete jerks. Somebody tell the GOP.

.

When the monster eats its master

When the monster eats its master

by digby

I wonder how John Cornyn feels being on the receiving end of the right wing’s nastiest jabs?

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: it’s your Frankenstein monster Republicans. How do you like him now?

Could GOP salivating over Obamacare help get immigration reform passed? by @DavidOAtkins

Could GOP salivating over Obamacare help get immigration reform passed?

by David Atkins

Don’t do anything to take the public’s eyes off of Obamacare. That appears to be the Republican strategy given the smoothness of the budget negotiations and the GOP’s current unwillingness to stir fiscal controversy. The bet is that problems with the ACA will yield political dividends for the GOP over the course of 2014, and that any reckless shutdown-style behavior can only harm their chances as Dems shoot themselves in the foot.

It’s a risky strategy for the GOP, to be sure. Most of the public doesn’t want to see the ACA repealed; many more people are signing up every day, and many millions more will do so particularly when the private insurers begin barrage the public with television ads. The feel-good success stories will also begin popping up more as well. That doesn’t mean the GOP is making a bad bet necessarily: distrust and negative feelings about the ACA may well be baked into the cake at this point, and Republicans may well profit electorally come November.

But regardless of the wisdom of the bet, there may be another silver lining: a chance for immigration reform as Republicans look to minimize damage from Latinos this cycle. Already there are some indications that immigration reform isn’t as dead as some might think:

A key House Republican said that if Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) secures several legislative wins early next year, an immigration bill could clear the lower chamber by next summer.

Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) was careful to say that the battles ahead for Congress and the White House — such as raising the debt ceiling — could shape whether the House acts on immigration reform in early 2014. Cole serves as a deputy whip on Boehner’s leadership team.

With the caveat that the House will not vote on the Senate-passed bill, Cole envisions a situation where Boehner allows a vote on a couple or all of the four-House-Judiciary Committee-passed measures on immigration reform/border security.
Noting that Boehner has made it “abundantly clear” that he’d like to move immigration bills, Cole said that “we just saw a budget deal that made progress that brought people together from both sides from very different perspectives and I suspect that can be done on immigration as well.”

The calculation may well be that the GOP base has nowhere else to go, so why not throw them under the bus on immigration while continuing to howl about the ACA? That strategy also has risks for the GOP, but if it means the passage of a decent comprehensive immigration reform plan it would be good for the country regardless of its impact on 2014.

.

Ruminations on race featuring Richard Pryor and Ta-Nehisi Coates #FundDigby

This post will stay at the top of the page for a while.  Please scroll down for new material.


Ruminations on race featuring Richard Pryor and Ta-Nehisi Coates

by digby

He was funny even when he wasn’t dirty:

When they censored his TV show, this was how he handled it. (The show didn’t last long …)

He may be my top favorite comedian of all time. Maybe it’s because I had an important cultural epiphany at one of his live shows back in the 70s, when I was just a teen-ager. I wrote about it when he died:

I’d never seen anything like Pryor before. It was more than comedy, and it sure as hell was more than “R” rated. It was cultural observation so universal and so penetrating that I saw the world differently from that night on. He didn’t just talk about race, although he talked about it a lot and in the most bracing, uncompromising terms possible. He also talked about men and women, age, relationships, family, politics and culture so hilariously that my jaw literally ached the next day. He was rude, profane and sexist. But there was also this undercurrent of vulnerability and melancholy running beneath the comedy that exposed a canny understanding of human foible. His personal angst seemed to me to be almost uncomfortably plain.

I looked around me in the audience that night, in which my little friend Kathy and I were among the fairly good sized minority of white people, and realized that we were all laughing uproariously together at this shocking, dirty, racially charged stuff. As someone who grew up in a rather typically racist American household it was an enormous, overwhelming relief. I understood Richard Pryor, the African Americans in the audience understood Richard Pryor and Richard Pryor and the African Americans understood me. He was right up front, saying it all clearly and without restraint. He wasn’t being polite and pretending that race wasn’t an issue. And it didn’t matter. Not one person in that audience was angry. In fact, not one person in that audience was anything but doubled over in paroxysms of hysterical laughter. He had our number, all of us, the whole flawed species.

Race is a topic I’ve been trying to write about since I started this blog. It’s so fundamental to American culture and politics that if you discuss those topics you simply have to write about it. I come at it from the perspective of a middle aged, white liberal women which may seem like the least likely person on earth to have anything to offer on this subject. But the time in which I grew up has been enormously eventful on this subject — and I’ve been paying close attention.

And I continue to read and absorb everything I can on this subject. It’s extremely important in trying to understand the dynamics that underlie the differences between the two political factions in America. In recent years the writer who has been most influential in my thinking on these matters is Ta-Nehisi Coates who writes so elegantly and so thoughtfully about his own experience and observations on the subject that I feel I have developed a whole new dimension of understanding. Rick Perlstein also continues to illuminate on the real history (as opposed to the disco-Hollywood version) of race during my lifetime.

I honestly cannot think of a subject that is more important for Americans to think about and challenge themselves. As you can see from this year’s embarrassing Deen and Duck controversies, it continues to divide and define who we are and reveal what we are as a society and I think it’s vital for members of all races to grapple with it as honestly as we can.

If you think our ongoing discussions here about race’s continuing relevance to the evolution of America’s national character, I hope you’ll think about throwing a couple of bucks into the kitty to keep this blog going for another year.

One of the best Christmas stories ever

One of the best Christmas stories ever

by digby

Just watch it:

There’s more:

After the video of Santana hugging Malone ran on KRON 4 Friday evening, more former members have come forward.
“My name is Rod Harper I just read your article about Carlos n Marcus,” the former Santana Blues Band percussionists said in an e-mail to Stanley. “Carlos, Marcus and I played together in that same band. We started on the same day with David Brown. Marcus n I left at the same time. It was emotional to see Marcus. He and I were pretty close.”
Santana producer and vocal arranger Bobby Scott says he would also like to reconnect with Marcus.
“Wow.. you found Marcus Malone,” Scott writes to Stanley. “I was in the band with him when and one day he vanished. God bless you this Christmas. Seeing those two hug brought tears to my eyes.”

Mine too.

This story came to me via Dennis Hartley who said:

Carlos is one of the good ones (even if he is one of those lefty 60s hippie idealists)

It’s holiday fundraiser time …

QOTD: Keeping it all in perspective

QOTD: Keeping it all in perspective

by digby

This is what I’ll never understand:

How is it possible that anyone could believe that a mechanism to buy private health insurance is comparable to death camps? Twisted doesn’t even begin to describe it.

Meanwhile, check out the latest defense of the Duck guy and his stupid comments.

In December 1955, Rosa Parks took a stand against an unjust societal persecution of black people, and in December 2013, Robertson took a stand against persecution of Christians,” wrote Bayne in an email to supporters.

“What Parks did was courageous,” said Bayne. “What Mr. Robertson did was courageous too.”

It’s only early afternoon here but I think it’s time for a little egg nog, don’t you? Oy …

Update: Roy has a doozy from Jonah Goldberg, who evidently looks in the mirror and sees some combination of Stephen Sagal and Dirty Harry. Oh Dear God. Forget the egg, just give me the nog …

Neat.

It’s annual holiday fundraising time …

.

War against entitlements is over (if you want it). Guess what? They don’t.

War against entitlements is over (if you want it).  Guess what?  They don’t. 


by digby

So, it looks as thought the endless obsession with the deficit and relentless drive to cut the safety net is finally over, at least among Democrats. Fix the Debt is rumored to be folding its tent and there is a new optimism in liberal circles that we may have finally turned the corner on this pernicious set of Grand Bargain policies.

Not so fast:

Neera Tanden, president of the Center for American Progress, argued that raising taxes on the wealthy is a fair-play way toward short-term deficit reduction, rather than a fix for the U.S.’ long-term debt problem. She added that economic growth — not wealth redistribution — is an equally high priority for alleviating income inequality.

“Our view is that we should be focusing on economic growth in the immediate term, and long term deficit reduction,” she said…One of the things I think we were particularly successful at [this year] was resetting the terms of the fiscal debate. We did a big paper this spring called ‘Time for a Fiscal Reset,'” Tanden said. “We kind of took a step back and saw that deficit projections were coming down, and unemployment projections were not coming down at the same velocity.”

“I want to be 100 percent crystal clear in this: the country has long term deficit challenges, so we believe that we should address those, and put good ideas around both taxes and entitlements on the table,” she said. “But now I think the priority for the country should be economic growth.”

Every time a Villager talks about “entitlements” and deficits in the same breath, another rich jackass gets his (right) wing.

I guess I don’t get why everyone’s talking about these comments. They’re exactly what the president’s been saying for the last five years — and this is the result:

That worked out so well, you can see why they don’t feel any need to change it.

It’s holiday fundraiser time …




Learning empathy before they die

Learning empathy before they die

by digby

This is nice, but it’s also another illustration of the fact that way too many conservatives only understand empathy when something terrible happens to them or one of their loved ones. Sometimes it takes them until they reach their old age:

One of the most partisan Republicans in the Senate, Oklahoma’s Jim Inhofe, said Sunday that his “attitude” toward Senate Democrats has changed as a result of the outpouring of sympathy he received from colleagues after the death of his son. Perry Inhofe, 52, was killed in a plane crash in November.

“I probably shouldn’t say this, but I seem to have gotten more — well at least as many, maybe more — communications from some of my Democrat friends,” Sen. Inhofe told host David Gregory on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “And I’m a pretty partisan Republican.”

In the wake of his personal tragedy, Inhofe said, “all of a sudden the old barriers that were there — the old differences, those things that keep us apart — just disappear. It’s not just a recognition that I know how much more important this is, but they do, too. And they look out. And they realize that you’ve lost someone. And that brings us closer together.”

That’s called being a decent human being. And you don’t have to know someone personally to feel sympathy for them when they are in tragic circumstances. In fact, most normal people learn this when they are children. And those who consider themselves Christians, as Inhofe does, supposedly learn all about this compassion stuff in Sunday School.

Inhofe suggested the change is also likely to extend beyond personal dynamics to his work in the Senate. “I can’t help but think when I’m confronting someone on something in which we disagree, I’ll know how they responded to my loss. And how we got closer. And it’ll stay that way,” he said.

It’s all about him.Which I think says everything you need to know about the conservative worldview.

Ooops, Rand Paul did it again

Ooops, he did it again

by digby

Just when I start to feel a little bit of sympathy for Rand Paul for being the latest target of the most authoritarian congressman in America, I turn around and see his little white slip showing again:

Paul doesn’t seem to know that he’s on shaky ground with racial issues. To wit, earlier this fall, he endorsed Greg Brannon, a Republican primary candidate for Senate in North Carolina. As Molly Redden reports for Mother Jones, Brannon is far outside the mainstream of American politics. He opposes public education, rejects the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over national law, and has lent his support to a pro-nullification rally held by the League of the South, a self-described “Southern nationalist” organization that is an obvious vehicle for neo-Confederate and white supremacist ideas.

Like Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Brannon sees the late Senator Jesse Helms, who represented North Carolina from 1973 to 2003, as a model for legislative behavior. “He was the one I most identified with,” said Brannon during a gathering this summer, “Senator No.” Helms, it should be said, was an unrepentant segregationist who used his power to institutionalize homophobia with attacks on gays and assaults on AIDS funding. To Helms, LGBT Americans were “weak, morally sick wretches,” and AIDS education was “obscene” and “revolting.”

Brannon stands with ugly forces in American life, and is the kind of far-right candidate who ought to be attacked and marginalized by Republican leaders. Like extremist candidates in Indiana, Missouri, and Nevada, his presence in the “tent” of the GOP is certain to alienate the voters who want to shift political gears without giving the car to a maniac. But, with endorsements from Rand Paul—“I support Greg Brannon, and expect him to be North Carolina’s next Senator”—and conservative activists like Red State’s Erick Erickson, there’s a fair chance he’ll make it through the primary and into the general election. And with a high profile comes a greater chance for disaster; given his history, I would be surprised if Brannon didn’t say something on race or gender that embarrassed him and his party.

Rand Paul doesn’t like being questioned about this sort of thing. He thinks it’s out of line to even suspect that he might even be a teensy bit sympathetic to racism despite the comments and endorsements that can only lead to to that conclusion.

As Jamelle Bouie, the author of the above piece, points out, Republicans always hate being accused of racism and you can’t blame them. It’s not exactly a popular position. He has some advice for them to avoid all this unpleasantness:

[H]ere’s the thing: If Rand Paul wants to avoid these questions, then he should avoid people who sympathize with white supremacists. And the same is true of the GOP writ large; if Republicans want to avoid accusations of prejudice or insensitivity, then the first step is to end the party’s association with lawmakers, officials, and activists who can’t help but indulge their worst instincts. After all, the Republican Party isn’t racist, and it shouldn’t be too hard to filter these people from the pool.

Zactly.

It’s holiday fundraiser time …

Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley — Bad hair decade: “American Hustle”

Saturday Night at the Movies




Bad hair decade: American Hustle



By Dennis Hartley














While I was waiting for the lights to go down at a packed sneak preview for David O. Russell’s American Hustle, a  Gandalf-looking fellow wearing what can only be described as a Jed Clampett hat squeezed in next to me, gave me a nudge and asked, “So, what’ve ya heard about this one…is it kinda like American Gigolo?” (They always find me…I don’t know how, but they do). Now praying for the lights to go down, I forced a polite smile and said “No, I don’t believe it’s about male hustlers. It’s about con artists, although it does take place in the 1970s.” He paused for a moment of contemplation. “Ah!” he exclaimed, “so it’s kinda like Boogie Nights?” While stealing a quick visual check of the house for any other available seats, I replied “No, I don’t think it’s about the porn industry. I understand that it’s based on the Abscam scandal…if you remember it.” Huge mistake. “Ah! We must be about the same age! What year were ya born? Tell me, do ya have a good home life?” Please…don’t weep for me; mercifully, I was saved by the lights.

My new BBF may have inadvertently stumbled onto something. It turns out that American Hustle actually is one of those “kinda like” movies. It’s kinda like Goodfellas , just not as stylish. It’s kinda like Jackie Brown, just not as clever. It’s kinda like Married to the Mob just not as funny. And if you’re expecting All the Presidents Men, fuhgettaboutit. Consequently, it is neither a candy nor a breath mint. It’s best described as New Yorkers screaming at each other for an interminable 2 hours and 18 minutes (with guest conniptions from the Jersey side). After the winking disclaimer “Some of this actually happened“, we are introduced to sleazy con man Irving (Christian Bale), who preys on marks with the help of his “British” girlfriend Sydney (Amy Adams). When the two stingers get stung by an undercover FBI operation, the hotshot agent in charge (Bradley Cooper) offers them a deal if they help him catch bigger fish by conning a mobbed-up Camden, NJ mayor (Jeremy Renner) into serving as unsuspecting facilitator.

The “sting” here is on the audience, because Russell and his co-writer Eric Singer, while proving quite skilled at window-dressing this as some kind of rollicking, vaguely socio-political 70s period piece, use the retro vibe as sucker bait to string us along waiting for something interesting to happen; by the time we realize we’ve been had, the credits roll. There is far too little focus on story or character development and too much fixation on fashion, furniture and hair (Bale’s Rube Goldberg comb-over, Cooper’s perm and Renner’s pompadour deserve their own credits). And while I’m nitpicking, about that music. While I love those super hits of the 70s as much as anyone else, if the story is set in 1978, why are 90% of the songs on the soundtrack from the early 70s? It’s a drag to see such a good cast wasted. Bale, Adams, Cooper, Renner and Jennifer Lawrence (playing Bale’s estranged wife with aplomb) are skilled, but even the best actors need some direction every now and then (like when to dial it down to a dull roar, an instruction that apparently went either unspoken or unheeded). So don’t be conned. Have a nice day!

Previous posts with related themes:



It’s annual holiday fundraiser time …