Skip to content

Month: February 2014

This country is just plain crazy

This country is just plain crazy

by digby

No, this is not a joke:

A blind man in Florida who was acquitted after shooting his friend to death under Florida’s “stand your ground” law got his guns back on Thursday, according to WESH Orlando.

It’s hard to know where to start with the absurdity.

Blind man has a gun.
Blind man shoots a friend of his with that gun.
Blind man is acquitted of killing his friend under stand your ground law which says you can shoot anyone who scares you (after all he couldn’t see it was his friend.)
Blind man gets his guns back

Police confiscated both of John Wayne Rogers’ guns when he was arrested for shooting a friend in the chest during a fight in his Geneva, Fla. home in March 2012. He was granted immunity after citing Florida’s “stand your ground” law in January.

Rogers fought to get his weapons back in court after his acquittal.

“It’s my constitutional right. I wasn’t carrying these firearms around. I was in my house on a private road in Geneva out of the way,” Rogers said, explaining that he needs guns for protection.

Judge John Galluzzo reluctantly ordered authorities to return Rogers both of his firearms, a 10mm Glock and a rifle, even though he said he didn’t want to.

“I have to return property that was taken under the circumstance,” Galluzzo said. “I have researched and haven’t found case law to say otherwise.”

Of course not. Wasn’t it Thomas Jefferson who said that it was far better for innocent people to die than for the government to deny a blind man the right to shoot people he cannot see? Or was that George Jefferson?

.

.

Oh heck. You mean Republicans are bashing Democrats for proposing to cut Social Security again?

Oh heck. You mean Republicans are bashing Democrats for proposing to cut Social Security again?

by digby

I have never understood why Democrats who have to run for office are so wedded to the idea that they will be rewarded for being “the adults in the room” and doing the “hard stuff” like cutting Social Security and Medicare benefits but they do. You’d think they’d remember what happened to them in 2010 when the Republicans ran against the Medicare cuts in the health care reforms by portraying them as monsters turning old people into Soylent Green. But they didn’t.

The president may have decided to keep his proposal to cut benefits from his new budget, but it’s quite clear from the talking points that they still very much want to get “credit” for being willing to do it. And I suppose if what you want is credit from the Masters of the Universe and wealthy donors that does make some sense. Many of them insist they are willing to kick in some chump change but only if everyone has “skin in the game” (although it must be noted that their “skin” is a small hangnail compared to the full field dress that’s being proposed for the elderly poor.)They are also big on “fiscal responsibility” and low debt — for everyone but themselves. Because they’re so good.

But if a Democrat thinks he or she is going to get credit from voters or that the Republicans are playing by some kind of Marquess of Queensbury rules that stipulate one mustn’t be ever so hypocritical, he or she needs to think it through a little bit more clearly.

For example:

[The National Republican Campaign Committee] sought to turn former state CFO Alex Sink’s attacks on David Jolly on Social Security against her. Sink, the Democratic candidate, takes on Republican Jolly and Libertarian Lucas Overby in a special congressional election for an open seat in Pinellas County on March 11.

On Thursday, the NRCC bashed Sink for saying she supported Simpson-Bowles.

“Alex Sink supports a plan that raises the retirement age for Social Security recipients, raises Social Security taxes and cuts Medicare, all while making it harder for Pinellas seniors to keep their doctors that they know and love,” said Katie Prill, a spokeswoman for the NRCC. “Sending Alex Sink to Washington guarantees that seniors right here in Pinellas County are in jeopardy of losing the Social Security and Medicare benefits that they have earned and deserve.”

Yeah, I’m going to guess that her opponents will get plenty of mileage out of her support for cutting Social Security … in Florida.

A Chevron lobbyist now runs the Congressional Science Committee, by @DavidOAtkins

A Chevron lobbyist now runs the Congressional Science Committee

by David Atkins

This is what happens when you put Republicans in charge of things:

For Chevron, the second largest oil company in the country with $26.2 billion in annual profits, it helps to have friends in high places. With little fanfare, one of Chevron’s top lobbyists, Stephen Sayle, has become a senior staff member of the House Committee on Science, the standing congressional committee charged with “maintaining our scientific and technical leadership in the world.”

Throughout much of 2013, Sayle was the chief executive officer of Dow Lohnes Government Strategies, a lobbying firm retained by Chevron to influence Congress. For fees that total $320,000 a year, Sayle and his team lobbied on a range of energy-related issues, including implementation of EPA rules under the Clean Air Act, regulation of ozone standards, as well as “Congressional and agency oversight related to offshore oil, natural gas development and oil spills.”

Sayle’s ethics disclosure, obtained by Republic Report, shows that he was paid $500,000 by Chevron’s lobbying firm before taking his current gig atop the Science Committee.

In recent months, the House Science Committee has become a cudgel for the oil industry, issuing subpoenas and holding hearings to demonize efforts to improve the environment. Some of the work by the committee reflect the lobbying priorities of Chevron.

In December, the Science Committee, now chaired by Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), held yet another hearing to try to discredit manmade global warming. In August, the committee issued the first subpoena in 21 years, demanding “all the raw data from a number of federally funded studies linking air pollution to disease.”

I have never understood how people sleep at night having thrown away all human decency in order to make an extra buck. I doubly don’t understand how those people have managed to take control of one of America’s two political parties.

No matter how often spineless and inept Democrats can be, as long as this is what Republicans are made of there’s no choice but to man the barricades and everything possible to keep them out of power.

.

“Some refer to them as mothers”

“Some refer to them as mothers”

by digby

I frequently use the inflammatory phrase “birthing vessels” to describe how the anti-abortion zealots see women, and have taken a fair amount of grief for it from liberal allies who think I’m unnecessarily upsetting all those millions of truly decent people who are morally unsettled by the idea that women are just getting themselves pregnant willy-nilly and killing little babies for their own convenience. After all, nobody really thinks that women are just vessels, right?

“I don’t expect to be in the room or will I do anything to prevent you from obtaining a contraceptive,” Martin wrote. “However, once a child does exist in your womb, I’m not going to assume a right to kill it just because the child’s host (some refer to them as mothers) doesn’t want it.”

That’s what a woman is to these people: a “host” for a child. Not even a human being.

From the beginning women have been, at best, second class citizens. First they were property, now they are “hosts”, but no matter what, their basic human rights are always tenuous and always subject to being redefined.

The man who revealed this little insight into his true beliefs has changed the word “host” on his Facebook page to say “bearer of the child” instead. I think he actually believes that makes a difference.

.

Governor catfight

Governor catfight

by digby

This sounds like a scene that was left on the House of Cards cutting room floor, but apparently it actually happened:

It started as a Kumbaya moment of bi-partisanship: A group of Democratic and Republican governors gathered at the White House talking to reporters about “common goals” and “working together.”

And then possible Republican presidential candidate Gov. Bobby Jindal, R-La., stepped to the microphones.

Jindal blasted President Obama for slow-walking a decision on the Keystone Pipeline and trashed his proposal to raise the minimum wage.

“This president and the White House seems to be waving the white flag of surrender,” Jindal said, flanked by several Democratic governors. “The Obama economy is now the minimum wage economy. I think we can do better than that. I think America can do better than that.”

With the gauntlet thrown down, the claws came out.

“That’s the most insane statement I’ve ever heard,” retorted Gov. Dan Malloy, D-Conn., who elbowed his way to the microphones to say he disagreed with Jindal on the minimum wage and the Keystone Pipeline.

“You just heard what I think just ended up being the partisan statement we heard all weekend,” Malloy said of Jindal’s comments.

That prompted Jindal to come back to the microphones to further criticize the president on health care. A few minutes later Gov. Martin O’Malley, D-Md., reminded reporters that Jindal had failed to pay his dues to the National Governor’s Association.

Kumbaya no more.

Bobby Jindal is a first class jerk and deserved to be slapped hard for that. But you just have to love the fact that Malloy is mad because he’s not being bipartisan and O’Malley comes back back at him with personal accusations about his Governor’s Association dues. Seriously? That’s the best a Democratic Governor can do?

Sheesh, it’s not hard to see why so many people reject the Democratic Party even though they agree more with its policies than with the GOP’s. It’s just too … embarrassing.

Update: The full story is even better than that original little blurb. Still a catfight but it turns out the Democratic governors got some pretty good licks in:

Louisiana Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal lashed out first, saying if Obama were serious about growing the economy he would approve the Keystone XL pipeline project and take other executive actions.

Instead, Jindal said, Obama “seems to be waving the white flag of surrender” on the economy by focusing on raising the federal minimum wage to $10.10, up from $7.25. “The Obama economy is now the minimum wage economy. I think we can do better than that,” Jindal said.

Jindal’s statements were the kind that Republicans often make on television appearances or at partisan events, but don’t usually come from potential presidential candidates standing yards from the Oval Office. Other governors had been instead expressing wide agreement and appreciation for the president’s time. As Jindal spoke, some of his colleagues began shaking their heads, and Hawaii Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie began audibly mumbling to others around him.

Connecticut Democratic Gov. Dannel Malloy took over the microphone from Jindal and responded sharply, “Wait a second, until a few moments ago we were going down a pretty cooperative road. So let me just say that we don’t all agree that moving Canadian oil through the United States is necessarily the best thing for the United States economy.”

Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin, a Republican who chairs the National Governors Association and supports Keystone, earlier said she asked Obama when the administration would decide whether to allow it and he told her there would be an answer in the next couple months.

Obama Looks to Governors for Help With EconomyPlay videoObama Looks to Governors for Help With Economy
Malloy said Jindal’s “white flag statement” was the most partisan of their weekend conference and that many governors support a minimum wage increase.

“What the heck was a reference to white flag when it comes to people making $404 a week?” Malloy snapped. “I mean, that’s the most insane statement I’ve ever heard.”

Jindal did not the back down.

“If that’s the most partisan thing he’s heard all weekend, I want to make sure he hears a more partisan statement,” the Louisiana governor responded. “I think we can grow the economy more if we would delay more of these Obamacare mandates.”

But Malloy was already walking away from the news conference. He called Jindal a “cheap shot artist” as he departed the White House grounds.

.

Bipartisan Executive CYA: we *will* not be embarrassed

Bipartisan Executive CYA: we *will* not be embarrassed

by digby

Gosh, I wonder why the framers of the Constitution thought it was a good idea to have freedom of the press, due process and public trials?

After seven years of litigation, two trips to a federal appeals court and $3.8 million worth of lawyer time, the public has finally learned why a wheelchair-bound Stanford University scholar was cuffed, detained and denied a flight from San Francisco to Hawaii: FBI human error.

FBI agent Kevin Kelley was investigating Muslims in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2004 when he checked the wrong box on a terrorism form, erroneously placing Rahinah Ibrahim on the no-fly list.

What happened next was the real shame. Instead of admitting to the error, high-ranking President Barack Obama administration officials spent years covering it up. Attorney General Eric Holder, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and a litany of other government officials claimed repeatedly that disclosing the reason Ibrahim was detained, or even acknowledging that she’d been placed on a watch list, would cause serious damage to the U.S. national security. Again and again they asserted the so-called “state secrets privilege” to block the 48-year-old woman’s lawsuit, which sought only to clear her name.

Holder went so far as to tell the judge presiding over the case that this assertion of the state secrets privilege was fully in keeping with Obama’s much-ballyhooed 2009 executive branch reforms of the privilege, which stated the administration would invoke state secrets sparingly.

“Under this policy, the Department of Justice will defend an assertion of the state secrets privilege in litigation, and seek dismissal of a claim on that basis, only when necessary to protect against the risk of significant harm to national security,” reads an April signed declaration from the attorney general to U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who presided over the Ibrahim litigation in San Francisco.

The state secrets privilege was first upheld by the Supreme Court in a McCarthy-era case and generally requires judges to dismiss lawsuits against the United States when the government asserts a trial threatens national security.

In his declaration, Holder assured Judge Alsup that the government would not be claiming national security to conceal “administrative error” or to “prevent embarrassment” — an assertion that is now nearly impossible to square with the facts.

Elizabeth Pipkin, the San Jose attorney who represented Ibrahim in her legal odyssey pro bono, said the Obama administration should be embarrassed.

“The idea that any of this poses any threat to national security is ridiculous,” Pipkin said in a telephone interview. “These government state secret privileges are to protect national security. They are not supposed to be used to cover up government errors.”

The Justice Department did not respond for comment.

It must be noted that this was a continuation of a Bush administration legal strategy, so anyone who claims that the Obama administration failed to act in a bipartisan manner isn’t seeing the whole picture.

This is why we have to be skeptical of government claims that all this spying is necessary to keep us safe from the boogeyman. They lie.

.

Democrats can’t tell sick voters they’re full of it, no matter if they’re angry, deluded, dishonest or justified.

Democrats can’t tell sick voters they’re full of it, no matter if they’re angry, deluded, dishonest or justified.

by digby

This is going to be a problem. Brian Buetler explores the latest right wing campaign to discredit Obamacare: deploy lying conservatives (a large pool) to claim they’ve been hurt by the reforms and dare a Democratic politician to challenge them:

[I]t places Democratic politicians on the horns of an awkward dilemma, because even if the story is completely bunk, it’s still a human tale, and no elected official comes out well by questioning a constituent who claims to have been harmed in some way.

Rep. Gary Peters, D-Mich., knows all about this dilemma. The right’s derp Howitzer spray-fired at Peters all weekend, because his lawyers sent threatening letters to station managers in Michigan who are running an Americans for Prosperity ad featuring Julie Boonstra, whose Obamacare “horror story” isn’t supported by the facts.

“The fact that Representative Peters would sic his legal team on a Michigan mother battling cancer to muzzle her tells you everything you need to know about his record of putting politics over people,” reads a statement from AFP’s Michigan state directer Scott Hagerstrom. “Julie Boonstra was brave enough to tell her story about how Obamacare is making her life worse and instead of offering compassion and solutions, Rep. Peters responded with intimidation … This attack on her credibility is disgusting, unwarranted, and inexcusable. Congressman Peters and his indecent campaign team should be ashamed of themselves.”

Peters is running for retiring Sen. Carl Levin’s Senate seat, so it’s of considerable interest to him not to create the perception that he’s bullying an innocent cancer patient. And of course he’s not. But the facts at the center of the controversy over Boonstra’s ad suggest a better way to expose the scam AFP is perpetrating.

Boonstra clearly doesn’t like the law. And she doesn’t have to like the law. But any other woman suffering with the exact same medical condition, and the exact same interactions with Obamacare — but minus a motivated hatred of the law — would be ecstatic about the savings and the new protections the law provides, and we would all be very happy for her.

Beutler cleverly shows just how much this person would likely truly suffer if her favorite politicians have their way and Obamacare is repealed but I feel fairly sure that the Republicans will not be able to get that accomplished. It’s such a good cudgel with which to beat Democrats, why would they take the chance of having repeal blow back on them? Unless they can assure themselves of a landslide national victory, which is not going to happen any time soon, they are far better off with the status quo.

All this does is create unhappiness among some members of their base of voters who would apparently rather die th than admit the insurance market was terrible before and better now. And yes, there are obviously some losers in this private market reform who are paying more, and they resent it. (But deep down they know very well that they were paying more every year anyway — we always did.) If we know one things by now we should know that any problem in healthcare going forward is going to be blamed on Obamacare by conservatives, whether it’s the line at the pharmacy or the mistake in the operating room, despite the fact that these things have always happened. That’s just the reality of the situation. The new baseline belief among conservatives is that the “best health care system in the world” was destroyed by the government. You knew that was coming, right?

These stories aren’t going away — there are deluded, angry, lying and sometimes totally justified constituents out there who are going to publicly confront Democrats for quite some time and these Democrats are going to have to have a strategy for dealing with it. They certainly can’t demean or contradict these voters. So, what do they do? It’s not a simple problem. And I don’t have the answer.

.

Wingnut welfare goes global

Wingnut welfare goes global

by digby

There’s a reason why they went to the right wing for this.  It’s the first place you’d look for that very special combination of corruption and authoritarianism:

Several conservative bloggers repeated talking points given to them by a proxy group for the Ukrainian government — and at least one writer was paid by a representative of the Ukrainian group, according to documents and emails obtained by BuzzFeed.

The Ukrainian campaign began in the run-up to high-stakes Ukrainian parliamentary elections last year, and sought to convince skeptical American conservatives that the pro-Russian Party of Regions, led by President Viktor Yanukovych, deserved American support. During that period, articles echoing Ukrainian government talking points appeared on leading conservative online outlets, including RedState, Breitbart, and Pajamas Media.

The emails and documents, which include prepackaged quotes from election officials and talking points that some writers copied nearly word-for-word, offer a glimpse into how foreign governments dodge tight Justice Department regulations on foreign propaganda to covertly lobby in the United States: The payments were routed through a front group in Belgium to an American consultant, who has urged writers not to cooperate with a reporter investigating the campaign.

The model resembles a recent stealth campaign in which bloggers were paid by the Malaysian government to write favorable stories, though the Ukraine campaign appears to have involved smaller sums of money.

Maybe I’m out of the loop but I’ve never heard of any “special interest” much less a foreign government approaching liberal bloggers with offers of payola. I suppose it might have happened, but it sure hasn’t happened to me.

This little gambit was reportedly cooked up by someone Buzzfeed calls a libertarian named George Scovill. That link leads to the Leadership Institute which is not a libertarian outfit — it’s a conservative movement institution that’s been around for decades:

The Leadership Institute is a 501(c) non-profit organization located in Arlington, Virginia that teaches “political technology.”.

The Institute was founded in 1979 by conservative activist Morton C. Blackwell. Its mission is to “increase the number and effectiveness of conservative activists” and to “identify, train, recruit and place conservatives in politics, government, and media.”

The Leadership Institute offers 40 types of training seminars at its Arlington headquarters, around the United States, and occasionally in foreign countries.[3] In 2009, the Institute trained more than 9,500 students. Since its 1979 founding, the Leadership Institute has trained more than 91,475 students. Notable alumni include Grover Norquist, Ralph Reed, Jeff Gannon, Senator Mitch McConnell, Congressman Mike Pence, James O’Keefe, and seven new members of the 112th Congress.

I suppose there are people who call themselves libertarians among the graduates. But they serve the conservative movement. As do most libertarians for reasons that can only be explained by their mutual love of money over human beings.

But lest anyone get the idea that the progressive side of the dial isn’t implicated in this sort of thing, let’s just say they keep it in the civilized elite circles where the big money plays:

An email from October 26, 2012 shows Scoville inviting writers to join a conference with Mikhail Okhendovskyy of Ukraine’s Central Election Commission. The call was organized by the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine, a Brussels-based group headed by Leonid Khazara, a former senior member of parliament from the pro-Russian Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych’s Party of Regions. According to its website, it is a “a unique ‘Modern Ukraine’ organisation based in Brussels and operating internationally as an advocate for enhancing EU-Ukraine relations.”

In practical terms, the ECFMU exists to promote Yanukovych and the party — but its nominal independence means that its representatives in Washington do not need to register as foreign agents and make the extensive disclosures required under that program. Instead, the only evidence of its activity comes in the far more relaxed domestic lobbying disclosure law, which shows that the Brussels-based group employs two well-connected Washington lobbying firms, The Podesta Group and Mercury/Clark and Weinstock.

See, one thing the Village liberals understand it’s that you don’t get the riff-raff involved in these things. They just don’t have enough to lose.

.

The dull roar of ongoing tragedy, by @DavidOAtkins

The dull roar of ongoing tragedy

by David Atkins

Remember when there was a vague hope of doing something about this?

It turns out that no matter how many kids get murdered, we’re just not going to do anything about it at all. In fact, we’re going to make it even easier to people to murder people who play the wrong kinds of music and get away with it.

Because freedom. USA! USA!