Skip to content

Month: January 2015

Happy days are here again

Happy days are here again

by digby

… for the super-rich. As usual:

The world’s 400 richest people added some $92 billion to their collective wealth in 2014, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. As of Dec. 29, they were all worth a combined $4.1 trillion.

According to Bloomberg, 2014’s biggest earner was Jack Ma, the co-founder of Alibaba, China’s largest e-commerce company, who added $25.1 billion to his fortune after Alibaba’s initial public offering in September. Microsoft’s Bill Gates remains the world’s richest man, adding some $9 billion to his net worth, which is valued at $87.6 billion.

In any event, these eye-popping figures should not be a surprise. Global inequality is deepening, with millions of poorer people around the world affected by rising rates of joblessness and decreasing incomes. At the same time, the world’s population of billionaires is growing as this Statista chart shows below.

The good news is that some Russian mega-rich lost their shirts. USA!USA!

This seems like a good time to post my little illustration of just how much money these people have compared to you:

The Kochs have over a hundred of those 1 billion dollar rooms. Lets just say that contributing a few hundred million to political campaigns isn’t going to make a dent in their fortunes. It’s the equivalent of tip money.

Also too this:



(Those charts are from this illuminating article in Mother Jones.) 
.

QOTD: Frank Serpico

QOTD: Frank Serpico

by digby

He wrote this piece about the NYPD for Politico a while back. It’s scathing as you might expect. This excerpt says it all:

And today the Blue Wall of Silence endures in towns and cities across America. Whistleblowers in police departments — or as I like to call them, “lamp lighters,” after Paul Revere — are still turned into permanent pariahs. The complaint I continue to hear is that when they try to bring injustice to light they are told by government officials: “We can’t afford a scandal; it would undermine public confidence in our police.” That confidence, I dare say, is already seriously undermined.

It is. But if people dare to express that loss of confidence the police will just refuse to respect legal authority and stop doing their jobs to shut the public up. It’s quite a racket.

h/t to @atinyrevolution

.

They did it again

They did it again

by digby

Some members of NYPD had another toddler tantrum today:

According to reports from the scene, scores of NYPD officers again turned their backs to Mayor Bill de Blasio at the funeral for slain officer Wenjian Liu Sunday morning. This was despite a memo from Police Commissioner Bill Bratton urging officers not to repeat the performance from the last week’s memorial for Rafael Ramos.

Ramos and Liu were murdered in an ambush-style shooting three weeks ago in Bedstuy, an incident that inflamed tensions between the department and City Hall. Yestersay officers saluted de Blasio and Bratton at Liu’s wake.

It was unclear how many officers turned their backs. View photos from the scene below:

So basically the NYPD is putting the city on notice that they do whatever they want and answer to no one, not even the families of slain fellow officers or the police commissioner. That’s good to know. I guess citizens just have to hope that all these fine fellows don’t decide they can literally get away with murder. Oh wait …

.

Huckabee!

Huckabee!

by digby

I wrote this for Salon a few months back. Don’t count him out.

Anyone starting to pay attention to the wide open Republican 2016 presidential field has to have wondered why in the world the charismatic, rock-star preacher TV celebrity from Arkansas hadn’t made any moves to join the race.  In a field dominated by, well … nobody … you’d think that the guitar-playing former Gov. Mike Huckabee would see that the nation is inevitably going to turn its desperate eyes to him. But until a poll out of Iowa showed Huckabee in first place — way ahead of his next rival Paul Ryan — there was hardly even a whisper of his name in pundit circles. Now it’s everywhere.

Byron York reported that Huckabee called reporters together yesterday for a wide-ranging conversation about the Middle East (he’s very concerned) and a possible presidential run and it looks like he’s getting back in the saddle. York observes that unlike his run in 2008 where he lamented all the chatter about Iraq, he’s going straight at foreign policy as the focus of his campaign, rather than domestic issues, which would appear to signal that the GOP is getting back in its comfortable groove. (Not that this should come as a surprise — Benghazi!

Some of this reticence to put their hopes and dreams once again in the other man from Hope is understandable.  After all, he declined to join the losing GOP clown show in 2012 after having made a fairly decent showing in 2008. (What most people would call having good political instincts is often seen among the faithful as a sign of disloyalty.)  In that race, Rick Santorum was left to carry the banner for the Christian right pretty much by himself and while he did a surprisingly respectable job of sticking it out to the bitter end, there’s really nobody in the world who can see him sitting in the Oval Office, not even his own voters.  Huckabee, on the other hand, has long been seen as a serious contender and for good reason. Nobody else in the Republican game today has his particular combination of political gifts. Why they’re almost, dare I say it, Reaganesque.

David Freedlander of the Daily Beasta few months back and observed that his once sunny-ish persona has been replaced with an angry fire-and-brimstone messenger of doom. It appears that the “Caring Mike” who once angered Grover Norquist with his “populist” apostasy about taxing a couple of rich guys for the illusory common good has transformed into “Mean Mike” who says the women of America “believe that they are helpless with Uncle Sugar coming in and providing for them a prescription each month for birth control because they cannot control their libido or their reproductive system without the help of government,” and wonders why it is that Christians “take it in the teeth time and time again.” Freedlander says that people who know Huckabee are divided about what’s responsible for this change. One side says it’s Huckabee the politician who has adapted his style to the political zeitgeist. The world is darker and meaner than it was in 2008, they say, and so he is simply reflecting the mood of the people. The other side says that he’s acquired a special conservative form of Stockholm syndrome, which happens to those who spend all their time in the right-wing noise machine, which is a very, very angry place.

And there may be a little truth in both theories. After all, Huckabee laid out of the 2012 race for very good political reasons — it was likely unwinnable, after all, and Romney was the favorite to win as the “turnaround artist” in a moribund economy. But he was also making serious money for the first time in his life as a TV and radio celebrity in the dark world of conservative media. He immersed himself in the anger and resentment required to thrive there and he did.

Regardless of his motives for changing his approach from a compassionate conservative to hardcore right-wing zealot, people are wondering just which one is the real Mike. And the fact is that it’s both. And it’s always been both. Mike Huckabee has that rare political ability to reach around to deliver a stiletto to the back while smiling to your face. Just as Reagan was able to make people laugh at others’ expense while seeming to stay above his own insults
case in point: “A hippie is someone who looks like Tarzan, walks like Jane and smells like Cheetah”), Huckabee can deliver a nasty line with the kind of humor that will appeal to the insensitive among us without getting in too much trouble with the normal people. Here’s just: “We’ve had a Congress that’s spent money like John Edwards at a beauty shop.”

That line embodies everything creepy about Mike Huckabee — and that conservatives love about him. It comes from that beloved anti-government, small town, 1950s perspective, it’s personal and nasty and it’s got a nice tinge of macho homophobia. It’s also clever (at least compared to the usual drab humor offered by conservative politicians). But perhaps this illustrates his talent even better: “Whether we need to send somebody to Mars, I don’t know. But I’ll tell you what, if we do, I’ve got a few suggestions, and maybe Hillary could be on the first rocket.” (Did I mention the 1950s perspective To the moon, Alice.) Here’s another one. When asked whether he believed in evolution he dodged with this bon mot: “If anybody wants to believe they’re the descendants of a primate, they’e welcome to do it.” He’s that good.

Back in 2012, Ed Kilgore wondered whether Huckabee could actually make the move since the big shots in the party like Norquist and the big money boys didn’t care for Huck’s populist tendencies. And the idea of giving up his lucrative career as a media celebrity had to play into it as well. But it appears that he may have successfully transformed himself into a vicious Tea Partying wingnut without missing a beat and he’s certainly earned himself millions in the intervening years between 2008 and today. The only question now is whether he can raise money.

Yesterday he said he didn’t think he would have any problem doing that and announced that he’s started an organization called America Takes Action, which he claims has already managed to collect over seven figures. His foreign policy commentary seemed virtually designed to appeal to mega-billionaire Sheldon Adelson, so perhaps he’s got the inside track on that as well.

In any case, Huckabee’s back on the political scene and it’s a mistake to count him out. Who else in the Republican Party can appeal to their macho side like Chris Christie while also filling the Christian right’s love tank like Rick Santorum? And doing it all with the nasty politics of Ted Cruz and the smug smile of Ronald Reagan? He has real political talent.

The bad news (aside from the prospect of him somehow winning) is that we will likely be treated to a reprise of him playing “Cat scratch fever” on his guitar alongside his good friend Ted Nugent. Yes, that happened:

I welcome him to the race. It makes it much more interesting.

Which one are you working for? by @BloggersRUs

Which one are you working for?
by Tom Sullivan

Those of us already pondering how to approach 2106 campaigns follow in Robert Woolley’s footsteps. The strategist for Woodrow Wilson’s 1916 presidential reelection campaign originated using message control, targeting, and opposition research, say Washington Post’s Dan Balz and John Maxwell Hamilton of Louisiana State University and the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Campaign technologies have changed more than many tactics, they argue.

But to fight its way back after a disastrous 2014, Democrats will have to do better than more of the same in 2016. The left will have to step up its game, writes Sean McElwee. Much more than a standard bearer, the left needs a movement:

The left must remember that leaders do not make movements; rather, movements make leaders. Instead of vacillating from one hero to another, the left must create a formidable power base from which to both defeat Republicans and shift Democrats to the left.

Turnout increases with income, McElwee writes, which leads Democrats to target higher income voters groups that do turn out. This compounds with them favoring policies that appeal to higher income voters, leaving poor non-voters even less incentive to go to the polls.

Mass mobilization of core constituencies is the first key to winning. Problem is, the very solutions McElwee offers are the ones Republicans — now in control of roughly 70 percent of state legislatures — are systematically targeting: eliminating same-day registration and expanding ID requirements. Not to mention eliminating or shortening early voting.

Party leaders cultivating more progressive candidates would help, especially more workers and African American candidates to help boost turnout among the half of Americans with working-class jobs. “The good news,” McElwee reports, “is that research suggests that people of color are actually just as likely as white candidates to win: the problem is that they often don’t run.”

Obviously. But there’s a reason for that besides old-boy gatekeepers among Democrats’ leadership. Money.

Legislation and regulations aimed at getting money out of politics is another obvious solution McElwee offers (like same-day registration, etc.) that both lower barriers to entry and tend to favor the left’s base voters. But we have a chicken-and-egg problem. If you expect to pass them, you have to have control, but how do you get control unless you pass them?

But McElwee nails the master solution, saying, “a progressive America will require work.” Working Families Party and groups such as New York Communities for Change have busted their tails to advance just the kind of policies that benefit Democratic constituencies and candidates.

I can’t count the times I’ve heard from a disgruntled progressive, “We need a third party in this country.” My response is always the same.

“I can name a half-dozen third parties off the top of my head. Which one are you working for?”

Sadly, that usually ends the conversation.

Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley: Girls just wanna play 7th Flat 9th Chords “Girls in the Band” and the Top 5 Jazz Movies

Saturday Night at the Movies

Dennis is still recuperating from surgery.  I thought I’d rerun this favorite of mine from earlier in 2014 — digby

Girls just wanna play 7th Flat 9th Chords


By Dennis Hartley



In the pocket: The Girls in the Band










“I have a dream that my four little children will live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr.

Contextual to a curiously overlooked component within the annals of American jazz music, it’s tempting to extrapolate on Dr. King’s dream. Wouldn’t it be great to live in a nation where one is not only primarily judged by the content of their character, but can also be appreciated on the merits of their creativity, or the pure aesthetics of their artistic expression, as opposed to being judged solely by the color of their skin…or perhaps even gender? At the end of the day, what is a “black”, or a “female” jazz musician, anyway? Why is it that a Dave Brubeck is never referred to as a “white” or “male” jazz musician?

Of course, in these (allegedly) enlightened times, these might be considered trite questions. But there was a time, not so long ago, in a galaxy pretty close by, when these questions would be considered heresy by some. For example, back in 1938, the venerable (and otherwise progressively-minded) music magazine Down Beat ran an article entitled “Why Women Musicians Are Inferior”. This is but one of the eye-openers in an overall eye-opening documentary by Judy Chaikin called The Girls in the Band, which (to my knowledge) is the first film to chronicle the largely unsung contributions that female jazz musicians have made (and continue to make) to this highly influential American art form.

I know what you’re thinking. Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald, Dinah Washington…they’ve had plenty of press over the years, right? Yes, they have. But (and not to denigrate those jazz giants) there is an important distinction…they are vocalists. Traditionally, as Chaikin points out in her film, that was a woman’s most accepted “place” in jazz. Piano? Sure, that was “allowed” (Hazel Scott, Jane Jarvis, Dorothy Donegan were early pioneers), but drums, vibes, guitar, horns, sax…fuhgettaboutit. Those take a man’s strength and stamina! But it turns out that female players have been acing it all along, having no problem keeping it (as my friend’s dad, a veteran jazz pianist, was fond of saying) “in the pocket”.

Utilizing rare archival footage and interviews with veteran and contemporary players, Chaikin has assembled an absorbing, poignant, and celebratory piece. Among the veteran interviewees, 88 year-old saxophonist Roz Cron gives the most fascinating perspective regarding the double roadblock of sexism and racism that she and her contemporaries bumped up against time and again (and not just from their male counterparts, who at times out-and-out mutinied against band leaders who invited female players to join or even merely sit in). As the only white musician in the all-female outfit, The International Sweethearts of Rhythm, she experienced some Kafkaesque moments while the band was touring through the South. Thanks to the pretzel logic of then still-extant Jim Crow “laws”, Cron was once arrested and jailed on a charge of “associating with negroes”. Oy.

While things have since obviously (and thankfully) loosened up on the “judging by gender” front, some of the old prejudices die hard. One interviewee, composer/band leader Maria Schneider recounts one experience with an interviewer, who opened with “So, what’s it like to be a woman composer?” To which she replied “What’s it like to be a male journalist?” But there is optimism as well. As Schneider offers later in the film “I hope we get to the day soon where it’s not something people think about, and categorize.” I suppose you could say that Maria Schneider also has a dream…and it is a good dream.





(Pt. 2) Angel-headed hipsters on celluloid: Top 5 Jazz Movies


















In keeping with the spirit of jazz, I thought I would improvise a bit on tonight’s theme and offer all you hep cats and kittens my righteous picks for the Top 5 jazz movies. Dig:

All Night Long– Directed by Basil Deardon (The League of Gentlemen, The Assassination Bureau) this 1962 UK film stars Patrick McGoohan (still a couple years shy of achieving international fame as TV’s Secret Agent Man) chewing all the available scenery as an ambitious, conniving jazz drummer. Nel King and Paul Jarrico based their screenplay on Shakespeare’s Othello, with the action taking place in an upscale London jazz club over the course of one evening. While it’s quite entertaining on its own merits, the film’s rep is bolstered by the then-contemporary jazz heavyweights who appear onscreen (most notably, Dave Brubeck and Charles Mingus). Richard Attenborough and Betsy Blair are also on board, and McGoohan proves that he isn’t half bad on the skins!


Jazz on a Summer’s Day– Bert Stern’s groundbreaking documentary about the 1958 Newport Jazz Festival is not so much a “concert film” as it is a pristine, richly colorful time capsule of late 50s American life. Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of gorgeously filmed numbers spotlighting the formidable chops of Thelonius Monk, Anita O’Day, Dinah Washington, Louis Armstrong, etc., but the film is equally captivating whenever cameras turn away from the artists and casually linger on the audience or the environs (like showing sailboats lazily puffing past the festival grounds), while the music continues in the background. The effect truly is like “being there” in 1958 Newport on a languid summer’s day, because if you’ve ever attended an outdoor music festival, half the fun is people-watching; rarely do you affix your gaze on the stage the entire time. In fact, Stern is breaking with filmmaking conventions of the era; you are witnessing the genesis of the cinema verite music documentary, which wouldn’t flower until nearly a decade later with films like Don’t Look Back , Monterey Pop , Woodstock and Gimme Shelter.



Let’s Get Lost– The life of horn player/vocalist Chet Baker is a tragedian’s dream; a classic tale of a talented artist who peaked early, then promptly set about self-destructing. Sort of the Montgomery Clift of jazz, he was graced by the gods with an otherworldly physical beauty and a gift for expressing his art. By age 24 he had already gigged with Stan Getz, Charlie Parker and Gerry Mulligan. He began chasing the dragon in the 1950s, leading to jail time and a career slide. There are conflicting versions of the circumstances that led to a brutal beating in 1968, but the resultant injuries to his mouth impaired his playing abilities. While he never kicked the substance abuse, he eventually got his mojo back, and enjoyed a resurgence of his career in his final decade (he was only 58 when he died). The nodded-out Chet Baker we see in Bruce Weber’s extraordinary warts-and-all 1988 documentary (beautifully shot in B&W) is a man who appears several decades older than his chronological age (and sadly, as it turned out, has about a year left to live). Still, there are amazing (if fleeting) moments of clarity, where we get a glimpse of the genius that still burned within this tortured soul. One scene in particular, where Weber holds a close up of Baker’s ravaged road map of a face while he croons a plaintive rendition of Elvis Costello’s “Almost Blue”, has to be one of the most naked, heartbreaking vocal  performances  ever captured on film. Haunting and one-of-a-kind, this is a must-see doc.



‘Round Midnight– Legendary sax player Dexter Gordon gives a knockout performance in Bertrand Tavernier’s 1986 drama (set in the late 1950s) about an American jazz musician who is invited to Paris for an extended engagement. Gordon’s character, Dale Turner, has been fighting a losing battle with the bottle, which has led to a dearth of gigs stateside. Turner is initially taken aback, but soon bolstered by his apparent cachet amongst the French (it’s no secret that African-American musicians were held in higher regard and treated with more respect abroad in those days that they were back home). Still, every day is a struggle for an addict, and as they say, “Wherever you go-there you are.” Excellent performances and magnificent playing from Gordon make this film a winner.



The Warped Ones– The protagonist in this New Wave-influenced offering from director Koreyoshi Kurahara may not be a musician, but the film itself is permeated by an energetic jazz soundtrack, and assaults the senses like the atonal screeches in an improvisational sax solo. Tamio Kawachi gives a surly and unpredictable turn as Akira, a jazz-obsessed young hood who bilks tourists at the seedy jazz club he hangs out at every night with his hooker girlfriend (Noriko Matsumoto). A nosy reporter narks him out and he does a stint in jail. After Akira gets out, he and his girlfriend are tooling around one of their favorite beach haunts in a stolen car when they happen upon said reporter, strolling with his fiancée. On the spur of the moment, Akira runs the reporter down and kidnaps his fiancée; launching a spree of uninhibitedly narcissistic and decidedly anti-social behavior by this rebel without a cause. Not for all tastes (the film truly lives up to its title) but a prime sample of Japan’s unique take on the late 50s/early 60s youth rebellion genre.



…and here’s the “next five” that I’d recommend for your queue: Bird, The Gene Krupa Story, A Man Called Adam, Pete Kelly’s Blues, Sweet and Lowdown.



Previous posts with related themes:
Venus in Furs


Saturday Night at the Movies review archive

Slednecks to the rescue

Slednecks to the rescue

by digby

A very good deed, indeed!

A moose caught in an avalanche in Hatcher Pass may have three passing snowmachiners to thank for making it into the new year.

The men dug the moose — a young cow, they think — out of the snow, apparently unharmed, after it was caught in an avalanche Dec. 28. One of the men, Marty Mobley, 44, said the moose probably caused the slide that swallowed it and that without the group’s help, it would not have survived.

“There was just enough of its snout sticking above the snow that it could breathe,” Mobley said.

Mobley said he and friends Rob Uphus, 30, and Avery Vucinich, 27 — all of them Valley residents — had gone snowmachining on the Willow side of Hatcher Pass, about 55 miles northeast of Anchorage, in an area known to locals as “God’s Country.” They rode carefully, he said, because of the constant fear of avalanches. Mobley’s best friend, Aaron Arthur, was killed along with five others while snowmachining in Turnagain Pass on March 21, 1999.

They saw a small bowl covered in moose tracks. Ski tracks were also easy to spot — something Mobley said he doesn’t often see in the area.

“We figured we scared the moose off and saw his tracks go up the side and over the crest,” Mobley said.

About an hour later, coming back through the same area, the trio saw an avalanche had come down in the bowl, obliterating both the moose and ski tracks. Mobley said the men were worried a skier got caught in the slide, so they took a closer look, nervous about the possibility of more avalanches.

“We had about 2,500 feet of mountain above us still,” Mobley said. “Half slid, half didn’t, so we didn’t want to screw around a bunch there.”

Mobley said as he got closer, he could see something brown and moving sticking above the hard-packed snow of the avalanche debris field.

“It looked like a guy’s arm at first because we were expecting to see a skier,” Mobley said. “But it was moaning and groaning and moving and we realized it was a moose, even though only his ears and some of its snout was sticking out of the snow.”

Mobley said the men grabbed their shovels and began to dig the moose out of the snow. Mobley said it didn’t move as they worked and even seemed to get calmer as they cleared snow away. Mobley said two men dug while the other served as an avalanche lookout.

“It didn’t even fight us,” Mobley said. “It was like, ‘Help me. Help me.’ It was totally docile and let us touch it. It just (lay) there,” Mobley said.

After about 10 minutes of digging, Mobley said, the men were able to free about three-quarters of the animal and weren’t sure if it was injured. So one of the men gently poked the moose’s backside with a shovel.

“It stood right up and towered over us, because we were in kind of a hole from the digging,” Mobley said. “It looked like the abominable snowman because its fur was so packed with snow and it looked at us, shook the snow off it, and off it went.”

Mobley said the moose was “at full steam” when it ran down the mountain and appeared to be completely uninjured, something that surprised the men.

He said he hoped their kind act would be rewarded with good karma. I think it will be.

See, Alaskans aren’t all like Palin — who probably would have just shot the poor thing.

.

Oh Huck

Oh Huck

by digby

Huckleberry Graham is leading from behind:

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham said in Jerusalem that the Senate will vote on an Iran sanctions bill next month.

Graham (R-S.C.), who is expected to take over as chairman of the Foreign Appropriations Subcommittee when the Republicans assume control of the Senate in January, met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Israeli capital on Saturday night.

Graham told Netanyahu that “the Congress will follow your lead” and will want to have a say about any final deal.

Young Turks has more:

I’m so old I remember when right wingers, including Graham, railed against any judge even referencing a foreign law in their opinions. But outsourcing the leadership on an important national security issue to a foreign leader is a-ok. Good to know.

I suspect that if say, Harry Reid were to tell Japan’s leader that the Congress would follow his lead, the right wing might just get a little bit agitated. In fact, they’d say he committed treason.

.

What’s in a name? A lot as it turns out.

What’s in a name? A lot as it turns out.

by digby

I confess this surprises even me:

A 2001 study catalogued all the ways in which the term “Black” carried connotations that were more negative than those of “African American.” This is troubling on the level of an individual’s decision making, and these labels are also institutionalized: Only last month, the U.S. Army finally stopped permitting use of the term “Negro” in its official documents, and the American Psychological Association currently says “African American” and “Black” can be used interchangeably in academic writing.

But if it was known that “Black” people were viewed differently from “African Americans,” researchers, until now, hadn’t identified what that gap in perception was derived from. A study, to be published next month in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, found that “Black” people are viewed more negatively than “African Americans” because of a perceived difference in socioeconomic status. As a result, “Black” people are thought of as less competent and as having colder personalities.

The study’s most striking findings shed light on the racial biases undergirding the professional world. Even seemingly innocuous details on a resume, it appears, can tap into recruiters’ biases. A job application might mention affiliations with groups such as the “Wisconsin Association of African-American Lawyers” or the “National Black Employees Association,” the names of which apparently have consequences—and are also beyond their members’ control.

In one of the study’s experiments, subjects were given a brief description of a man from Chicago with the last name Williams. To one group, he was identified as “African-American,” and another was told he was “Black.” With little else to go on, they were asked to estimate Mr. Williams’s salary, professional standing, and educational background.

The “African-American” group estimated that he earned about $37,000 a year and had a two-year college degree. The “Black” group, on the other hand, put his salary at about $29,000, and guessed that he had only “some” college experience. Nearly three-quarters of the first group guessed that Mr. Williams worked at a managerial level, while 38.5 percent of the second group thought so.

I can’t imagine where anyone comes up with that kind of illustration anyway, but perhaps I’m missing some important details in the description of Mr Williams that might lead the subjects to make these judgements. But whatever they were it’s obvious that this particular descriptor carries some very specific weight.

It explains something I noticed a while back when talking to some police officers investigating a robbery in my neighborhood.As is so often the case they were milling around for hours talking to one another and it was a hot day so I came out an offered them some cold water. We got to chatting and one of the guys told me about how he saw an actor from CSI on the street and couldn’t remember where he knew him from. He described him to me as an African American guy with blue eyes. The alleged robber had been referred to as black throughout the entire exchange.

The article goes over the long fraught history of words used in the US to describe our African American fellow citizens and suggests that African American may not be the last one we come up with. I think “American” would be good. Or maybe just “human.”

.

The big payoff: Freeh and easy after public service.

Freeh and easy after public service

by digby

Just in case you aren’t cynical enough about our elites, you should probably read these pieces by Ken Silverstein at The Intercept. He’s following the money of failed government officials like George Tenent and Louis Freeh after they enter the private sector. It’s quite interesting. Here’s just one bit of the story on Freeh:

Freeh resigned from the FBI two months before 9/11. When he worked there he was making an annual salary of $145,000 and lived “in a heavily mortgaged house in Great Falls, a Virginia suburb,” according to an old and admiring New Yorker profile. He and his wife now own at least four lavish estates worth many millions of dollars, including a residence in Wilmington, Delaware, a six-bedroom summerhouse worth more than $3 million in Vermont, and a beachfront penthouse at 100 Worth Avenue in Palm Beach, Florida, which was bought for $1.4 million and now has an estimated value of $3 million.

How’d that happen? Well, Freeh is one of many former U.S. officials who got paid big speaking fees (reportedly up to $50,000 a pop) by a creepy Iranian group called the People’s Mujahedin, also known as Mojahedin-e-Khalq, or MEK, to successfully advocate for its removal from the State Department’s list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. He also opened up a consulting firm whose clients have included Saudi Arabia’s Prince Bandar, who the U.S. Department of Justice accused of taking massive bribes from a British defense contractor. That’s right, Freeh represented a prince from America’s old pal Saudi Arabia, home to fifteen of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers, and whose export of Wahhabism is credited with giving rising to the Islamic State.

Freeh is also hired to conduct investigations, like the controversial report he produced about Penn State’s football program. Nasser Kazeminy, a Minnesota businessman who in 2008 was accused of bribing former Senator Norm Coleman, also hired Freeh to conduct a “thorough investigation” of the allegations against him in the hopes of clearing his name.

In 2011, Freeh issued a public statement saying that his investigation had “completely vindicated” both Kazeminy and Coleman. Sure, Kazeminy had bought Coleman $100,000 worth of presents, but, Freeh said at a press conference, “There was no quid pro quo in the gifts. There was no wrongdoing.” Freeh also met with the Justice Department – which was investigating the bribery charges but declined to bring a case—on Kazeminy’s behalf.

Oh yeah, about Freeh’s Palm Beach penthouse. As I discovered through Florida property records, Freeh’s wife co-owns it with Kazeminy, which kind of makes you wonder about just how thorough and impartial his investigation was. The quit claim deed giving Freeh’s wife one-half ownership of the penthouse was signed nine days after Freeh’s vindication of Kazeminy.

Basically, Freeh is trading on his completely bogus reputation as a straight shooting son-of-a-gun (he isn’t — he’s little better than a right wing operative) to “investigate” wrongdoers and exonerate them. If you want a peek at the libertarian paradise in which the government police functions are privatized, Freeh’s firm is probably a good place to start.

.