Skip to content

Month: March 2015

Go Donna Go

Go Donna Go

by digby

Politico reports:

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid’s endorsement of Rep. Chris Van Hollen in the Maryland Senate race last week was a sign that national Democrats hope to clear the field for Van Hollen, a seven-term congressman from Montgomery County who’s held posts in party leadership.

But it’s not likely to work — and Maryland could be the next example of the simmering divide between the Democratic establishment and liberals who would rather see Sen. Elizabeth Warren on the 2016 ticket than Hillary Clinton.

Progressive allies are increasingly convinced that Rep. Donna Edwards is about to enter the contest to succeed Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), who announced her retirement earlier this week. Two potential national allies of Edwards told POLITICO Campaign Pro they expect her to announce a Senate bid this week.

“I’m totally confident she’s serious and will run,” a national progressive activist said. “At this point, I would be surprised if she didn’t.”

Edwards’ campaign declined to confirm she’s entering the race but accelerated her timeline for a decision. “Congresswoman Edwards is seriously considering a run for the U.S. Senate and will make a decision in the coming days,” Edwards spokesman Ben Gerdes wrote in an e-mail last Friday.

There are a lot of good candidates in Maryland. But I’d really like to see us not lose any more female representation in the Senate if we could help it. (It seems like it’s always one step forward two steps back…) And Edwards has been a stalwart movement progressive from the beginning of her congressional career. We were there for her and she’s been there for us. She would be a really great Senator.

If you’d like to send a little token to let her know that you’d like her to run, Blue America was the first to call for a Draft Donna campaign. You can join that campaign here.

.

Chicken Little is very, very, very afraid. Of everything.

Chicken Little is very, very, very afraid. Of everything.

by digby

Huckleberry Graham is going to have a heart attack. As you recall he’s been consistently calling for the smelling salts over ISIS:

We’re in a religious war. These are not terrorists. They’re radical Islamists who are trying to replace our way of life with their way of life. Their way of life is motivated by religious teachings that require me and you to be killed, or enslaved, or converted. The President of the United States tip-toes around the threats we face, and he is trying to diminish the religious aspect of this war. Why? I don’t know. And he is not engaging the enemy in an aggressive fashion, which makes it more likely we’ll get attacked. 

What he’s doing is pretending to want to destroy ISIL when in fact, he’s trying to get out of office without having to commit American ground forces to do the job as part of a team in the region, because he made a campaign promise. His campaign promises, Hugh, are getting a lot of people killed.

Scary, huh? I’d say so. How about this:

“[T]hey’re intending to come here. So, I will not let this president suggest to the American people we can outsource our security and this is not about our safety. There is no way in hell you can form an army on the ground to go into Syria, to destroy ISIL without a substantial American component. And to destroy ISIL, you have to kill or capture their leaders, take the territory they hold back, cut off their financing and destroy their capability to regenerate.This is a war we’re fighting, not a counterterrorism operation. This is not Somalia, this is not Yemen. This is a turning point in the war on terror. Our strategy will fail yet again.

This president needs to rise to the occasion before we all get killed back here at home!”

Oh my God! What could be worse than this? Well it turns out that these ruthless killers who are coming to kill us all here at home are nothing compared to the evil monsters on the other side of ISIS. It’s hard to believe it’s possible that such a thing exists, but this morning he named an even greater enemy:

Potential 2016 presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Sunday he fears Iran more than the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

“Absolutely,” he said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “It’s not even close.”

“They’re an evil regime,” he said. “A cold-blooded regime.” 

“I fear them more than I fear [ISIS],” he added.

I think the question is, who isn’t Graham afraid of? And why does he think that anyone would want to vote for Chicken Little as commander in chief?

.

Sunday funnies

Sunday funnies

by digby

This is a hilarious impression of Hillary Clinton, you must admit:

Also this from McFadden:

And the loser is… by @BloggersRUs

And the loser is…
by Tom Sullivan

Remember Solyndra, that failed solar tech startup the GOP tried to hang around President Obama’s neck like an albatross? Mitt Romney campaigned in front of the closed Solyndra factory in 2012, trying to deflect attention from his vulture capitalist record at Bain Capital. See, the problem was that Big Gummint was perturbing the economic gods with clean energy subsidies, “stifling free market competition by picking economic winners and losers.”

Yesterday, I concluded a post noting that it is some kind of article of faith on the right that “government shouldn’t pick winners and losers.” Rather than call them hypocrites this fine Sunday morning, let’s just say they apply that principle somewhat unevenly.

The Washington Post this morning looks at the growing threat rooftop solar poses to the big utility companies. Industry executives met in Colorado three years ago to plan how to fight back, Joby Warrick reports:

If demand for residential solar continued to soar, traditional utilities could soon face serious problems, from “declining retail sales” and a “loss of customers” to “potential obsolescence,” according to a presentation prepared for the group. “Industry must prepare an action plan to address the challenges,” it said.

The warning, delivered to a private meeting of the utility industry’s main trade association, became a call to arms for electricity providers in nearly every corner of the nation. Three years later, the industry and its fossil-fuel supporters are waging a determined campaign to stop a home-solar insurgency that is rattling the boardrooms of the country’s government-regulated electric monopolies.

Those free-market zealots among the Koch-backed American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) have been trying to roll back solar expansion that threatens the fossil fuels industry with “potential obsolescence,” as the Post described it above. They’ve been trying to leverage their influence with Republican lawmakers. The free-marketeers want government help in guaranteeing they stay winners. There’s one big problem:

The average price of photovoltaic cells has plummeted 60 percent since 2010, thanks to lower production costs and more-efficient designs. Solar’s share of global energy production is climbing steadily, and a study last week by researchers from Cambridge University concluded that photovoltaics will soon be able to out-compete fossil fuels, even if oil prices drop to as low as $10 a barrel.

Turns out that instilling that free-market fervor can really bite when you’re operating a government-sanctioned monopoly and even conservatives and evangelicals in red states like Utah like putting solar panels on their church roofs. Trying to impose a solar surcharge offends their free-market sensibilities, so carefully cultivated by the right. Legislative efforts in Indiana and Utah to slow down solar’s expansion by outlawing “net metering” (homeowners selling excess power they generate back to the grid) have failed. “Some of the proposals were virtual copies of model legislation drafted two years ago by the American Legislative Exchange Council,” Warrick writes.

It’s not easy being mean.

Saturday Night at the Movies by Dennis Hartley — I bling the body electric: “Chappie”

Saturday Night at the Movies


I bling the body electric

By Dennis Hartley

Baby’s first tag: Chappie

The mathematician/cryptologist I.J. Good (an Alan Turing associate) once famously postulated:

Let an ultra-intelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man…however clever. Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultra-intelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an ‘intelligence explosion’, and the intelligence of man would be left far behind. Thus, the first ultra-intelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control.

Good raised this warning in 1965, about the same time director Stanley Kubrick and sci-fi writer Arthur C. Clarke were formulating the narrative that would evolve into both the novel and film versions of 2001: a Space Odyssey. And it’s no coincidence that the “heavy” in 2001 was an ultra-intelligent machine that wreaks havoc once its human overseers lose “control” …Good was a consultant on the film. While the “A-I gone awry” prototype dates as far back as the metallic “Maria” in the 1927 silent Metropolis, it was “HAL 9000” that took technophobia to a new level, spawning a sci-fi film subgenre that includes The Demon Seed, Colossus: The Forbin Project, Blade Runner, The Terminator, Robocop, I, Robot, and (of course) A.I. Artificial Intelligence.

There are echoes of all the aforementioned (plus a large orange soda) in Chappie, the third feature film from South African writer-director Neill Blomkamp. In this outing, Blomkamp returns to his native Johannesburg (which provided the backdrop for his 2009 debut, District 9). And for the third time in a row, his story takes place in a dystopian near-future (call me Sherlock, but I’m sensing a theme). Johannesburg has become a crime-riddled hellhole, ruled by ultra-violent drug lords and roving gangs of thugs. In fact, the streets are so dangerous that the police department is reticent to put its officers on the front lines. So they do what any self-respecting police department of the dystopian near-future does…they send droids out to apprehend bad guys.

The popularity of these programmable robocops has created lucrative contracts for a company called Tetravaal, which employs mild-mannered designer Deon (Dev Patel). In his spare time at home, Deon has been working on an A.I. chip that approximates “consciousness”. Jacked on Red Bull, Deon pulls an all-nighter and makes his breakthrough. Excited, Deon approaches Tetravaal’s CEO (Sigourney Weaver) with a proposal to work up a prototype. Unfortunately, she doesn’t seem to share his vision, and Deon is essentially laughed out of her office. I mean, who needs a police droid with “feelings”, right? Determined to carry out his experiment, Deon surreptitiously re-appropriates a damaged droid scheduled for destruction and absconds with it. However, before he can make it safely home on Johannesburg’s mean streets, he is carjacked and abducted by a trio of somewhat inept gangbangers (Ninja, Yolandi Visser, and Jose Pablo Cantillo) who figure they can coerce Deon into securing them a remote control that shuts down the police droids (even though they are only speculating that such a device even exists). They may not get that, but what they do end up with is a droid with self-awareness and the ability to absorb and mimic human behavior. Will he “grow up” as the enlightened being that his Gepetto-like creator intended, or will he turn into the “gangsta” that his thug “Daddy” wants him to be?

Through their creation of the character “Chappie”, Blomkamp and co-writer Terri Tatchell have managed to put a fresh spin on a well-worn trope. When you cut through all the bombast and the obligatory action tropes in the narrative, “his” story resonates at its core with a universal, even timeless kind of appeal. In fact, you could say that the film has more in common with Oliver Twist than it does with, say, Robocop. Chappie is, almost by the very definition of his inception, an “orphan”; innocent and pure of heart. Through no fault of his own, the child-like droid is quickly shuffled by fate and circumstance into the thug life, where he is tutored in street smarts and criminal behavior by “Ninja”, who sort of plays Fagin to his Oliver. On another level, Blomkamp and Tatchell are exploring the “Nature vs Nurture” theme as well in their screenplay.

This is a return to form for the director, especially after his slightly disappointing sophomore effort Elysium (a film that I enjoyed, but didn’t find quite as exciting and original as District 9). I really got a kick out of the performances, especially scene-stealers Ninja and Visser, who are actually slumming from their day job here as the rap outfit Die Antwoord (apparently very popular with the “zef” crowd…I’ll let you look that up, like grandpa had to prepping this review). Hugh Jackman seems to be having a blast hamming it up as a heavy, and Blomkamp’s favorite leading man Sharlto Copley does a marvelous job breathing “life” and personality into Chappie  (move over, Andy Serkis!). BTW, despite my references to Pinocchio and David Copperfield, this one is definitely not for the kids; it’s rated ‘R’ (which stands for Robots Are Under the Bed!).

Previous posts with related themes:

9

Surprise, surprise, surprise

Surprise, surprise, surprise

by digby

Gosh, it turns out that all those Republicans who wanted to make birth control available over the counter in the last election aren’t rushing to make that happen:

Remember how a bunch of Republicans, right before the election, started to get really excited about how much they loved contraception and how they wanted to make it easier for women to get by making prescription birth control pills available over-the-counter? Don’t feel bad if you forgot. I did, and I wrote multiple pieces at the time explaining some of the logistical problems with this plan, as well as expressing skepticism about their sincerity in offering this as an actual solution to women’s birth control woes. The issue, which was getting so much glowing coverage in the months before November, fell off the radar so abruptly after Election Day that it was almost as if it never happened.

But I was reminded of it again this week when Sen. Thom Tillis—who made a big, honking fuss during the election about how he loved the pill so much he wanted to make it as easy as gum and batteries for women to buy—hired a legislative director named Katy Talento. Talento is not a fan of the birth control pill, which she has falsely claimed causes infertility and works by aborting pregnancies. Perhaps Tillis’ opposition to mandatory insurance coverage of birth control is not rooted in a love of the “free market,” as he claimed prior to the election, or else he wouldn’t be so cozy with people who just don’t want you to have access to the pill at all. Seems like his stance regarding contraception was simply a cynical ploy to hoodwink moderates into voting for him after all. (Tillis has released a statement on the matter directing members of the public to see his campaign statements for his views on birth control.)

On the off chance this was a one-time situation, I thought I’d follow up with some of the other Republicans who burnished their pro-woman bona fides by touting their supposed support for over-the-counter (OTC) birth control. Are they busy drafting bills to make this happen? Are they pressuring the FDA to work on it? Asking drug companies to apply for OTC status for birth control?

Ha, no. Cory Gardner, who edged Mark Udall out in a tight race to win a senate seat for Colorado by trumpeting, in part, his new-found love for hormonal contraception, has not shown an ounce of enthusiasm for the subject since the election returns came in. A Google search for public statements on the issue or legislative efforts starting from November 5, the day after Election Day, produces zip in the way of attempts to make those OTC birth control pills a reality. But he’s had plenty of time to co-sponsor multiple bills intended to repeal Obamacare, even though he and his fellow Republicans know that those bills would, if they ever passed, be immediately vetoed by President Obama. Priorities, I guess.

Same story with Barbara Comstock, who won a congressional race in Virginia trying to downplay her opposition to reproductive health-care access by talking a big game about OTC birth control pills. That gusto has vanished into thin air since the election. Her legislative record shows zero interest or movement on this issue, though she too has co-sponsored go-nowhere legislation intended to repeal Obamacare.

I suspect if we check in with these folks a year from now, we’ll get the same results.

A very safe bet.

Libertarian theocrat

Libertarian theocrat

by digby

You know who I’m talking about:

Potential 2016 Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul said on Friday affording the distinction to marriage to same-sex couples “offends myself and a lot of other people.”

In an interview with Bret Baier of Fox News, the Kentucky Republican, who described himself as a “libertarian conservative,” made the remarks when asked about his views on gay rights.

“I’m for tradition marriage,” Paul said. “I think marriage is between a man and a woman.

Ultimately, we could have fixed this a long time ago if we just allowed contracts between adults. We didn’t have to call it marriage, which offends myself and a lot of people.”

Paul continued, “I think having competing contracts that would give them equivalency before the law would have solved a lot of these problems, and it may be where we’re still headed.”

For Paul’s vision of equal rights for same-sex couples through contracts to become a reality, the first step would be have to be a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court in June upholding state prohibitions on gay nuptials.

This is why it’s hard to take libertarianism seriously. This man is the acknowledged leader of that faction. And he is unable to say that it’s none of his business who marries whom or admit that women own their own bodies (but says they do own their children!)It’s inconsistent on such a fundamental level that it gives away the game: he’s either whoring for the social conservative vote or he’s philosophically incoherent. Libertarians believe they are the “principled” members of our political family and yet when push comes to shove the only principle most of them really care about is the one that says they shouldn’t have to pay a dime toward the greater good.

.

By their friends we shall know them

By their friends we shall know them

by digby

The right wing which tried to bring down Bob Menendez with a phony sex scandal is now rending their garments over the DOJ going after him for corruption:

Senator Ted Cruz has alleged that the leak of the pending indictment of the New Jersey Democratic senator Bob Menendez may be a politically motivated act of retaliation by Barack Obama and the Department of Justice.

Speaking to reporters at the Iowa Agricultural Summit in Des Moines on Saturday, the Texas Republican said he found it “awfully coincidental” that charges were reportedly set to be brought against Menendez, a leading Democratic critic of Obama’s Middle East policy, during such a fraught period in US negotiations with Iran.

The two-term New Jersey senator has long been under investigation regarding his ties to Salomon Melgen, a wealthy donor. The two have vacationed together in the Dominican Republic and Menendez has advocated for policy changes to Medicare which would financially benefit Melgen, an ophthalmologist.

To Cruz, it was “a troubling coincidence” that a two-year investigation into Menendez was culminating in the same week the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, addressed a joint session of Congress to condemn the negotiations.

Cruz went on to say that this “raises suggestions to other Democrats if you dare part from [the] Obama White House that criminal prosecutions will be used potentially as a weapon against you as well”.

Lulz. yeah, the DOJ is probing every Democrats and has a case all lined up in the event they cross the Tyrant Obama on Iran …

Making a mockery of the bad guys

Making a mockery of the bad guys

by digby

Dennis Hartley reminded me that back when we actually had an existential threat and were fighting a war on many fronts all over the globe with people who really did want to kill us in our beds, we weren’t quite so sensitive about making fun of our self-declared enemies:

I wonder if SNL will come back this week with another ISIS satire or if they’ll cave to the deep thinkers like Elizabeth Hasselback who thinks it’s insensitive to mock psychopathic killers. I guess it makes them feel bad about themselves or something.

.