Skip to content

Month: September 2015

A needed antidote to GOP dystopian hellscape propaganda @chrislhayes #inners

A needed antidote to GOP dystopian hellscape propaganda 

by digby

While we were all downing shots and glibly exchanging bon mots on twitter last night, Chris Hayes was interviewing Ahmed Mohammed, the 14 year old budding inventor from Texas who was held by police for making a clock earlier this week.

The exchange literally brought tears to my eyes.  In a good way.  And lord knows, I needed it. I think we all do:

This did too:

Twitter and Facebook have invited him to their headquarters with Twitter asking if he’d like to intern with them. And as you can see, MIT and Harvard have invited him to come see them.

This is a much needed corrective to the dystopian hellscape all those Republicans were trying to get Americans to believe their country has become — because of the foreign invaders from all over the world who are raping and killing us in our beds.

There is another America, the one that can instantly see that this is an All-American kid who has the moxie, intelligence and imagination to lead this country into a better future.

It’s interesting that his story went viral at the same time as another meme was coursing through social media:

And, by the way, Hullabaloo’s movie guy, Dennis Hartley who happened to review the new Steve Jobs movie last week-end  noted the meme and wrote this at the end:

There is a corollary linking the Jobs legacy to the current Syrian refugee crisis in the form of an internet meme that has been gaining momentum over the past week. As you may (or may not) be aware, Jobs’ biological father was a Syrian political refugee. It’s a hopeful reminder of what America is supposed to be about, and an immunization against the moronic, knee-jerk fear-mongering already being propagated about how ISIS operatives will surely embed themselves with U.S bound Syrian refugees. 


Send these, the homeless, the tempest-tossed, to me. Except for you. I didn’t mean you.

You can watch the whole interview over at MSNBC.

Buddies in the clown car

Buddies in the clown car

by digby

This is fascinating:

In fairness, I’m pretty sure I’d rate pretty low on this too. But it’s interesting that Cruz is the most sophisticated speaker.

Sam Seder has an interesting theory that has me thinking. He says that Trump doesn’t really want to be president and is going to drop out come time next year and endorse Cruz. I could see that. Cruz has never criticized Trump and they appeared together at the Iran deal rally a couple of weeks ago and were on friendly terms. It could happen …

.

A blast from the past

A blast from the past

by digby

With all the Fiorina love this morning I thought it might be fun to take a look back at the 2012 race. Does anyone remember this?

WASHINGTON — Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann opened the first big Republican debate in New Hampshire on Monday by announcing she had filed the paper work for her presidential campaign.

By the evening’s end, she had launched it there.

On a crowded stage, Bachmann was lively, confident, personable — she managed to mention her 23 foster children three times — and unremittingly critical of President Obama’s policies from health care to Libya. Against other contenders with longer resumes and more experience, she emerged from the pack in way that is likely to make it easier for her to raise money, attract grass-roots support — and even emerge as a Tea Party favorite to rival Sarah Palin.

Critics point out her lack of experience on a national stage, her embarrassing gaffes in discussing American history, the turmoil and turnover in her small House staff, the fact that she has only fledgling or non-existent political organizations in the key early states. Not since the 19th century has a sitting member of the House been elected president.

None of that was enough to chill the moment for Bachmann, who returned to Washington Tuesday morning to accolades from pundits as the new break-out star of a Republican presidential race that is finally taking shape.

Conservative Republican leaders affiliated with the Tea Party movement in New Hampshire praised Bachmann’s performance in the debate — her introduction to many voters in the state. She has been spending more time and effort in Iowa, which is where she was born and is next to her home state of Minnesota. Iowa holds the first caucuses and New Hampshire the first primary.

That was fun too.

Yet more SuperCarlytrumpaliciousExtraBraggadocious

Yet more SuperCarlytrumpaliciousExtraBraggadocious

by digby

(I can’t compete with Tom Sullivan’s great title from earlier this morning, so I just stole it) wrote about Fiorina too, of course, for Salon this morning. An excerpt:

Fiorina has come a long way since the days of the “Demon Sheep.”
Last night, CNN’s Jake Tapper asked her about Trump’s rude comments insulting her looks in Rolling Stone. She smoothly used something Trump had said earlier to segue into a prepared line, that she thought “women all over this country heard very clearly what Mr. Trump said.” Then she stood still and stone-faced, staring forward while Trump stammered that he thought she had a “beautiful face” and was a beautiful woman. She never looked at him. It may have gotten the biggest applause of the night.
MSNBC’s Chris Matthews seemed especially excited that she was going for Hillary Clinton’s throat in a way that others could not, but he is apparently unaware that this is one of the reasons she’s in the race in the first place. Recall this from an earlier piece I wrote about Fiorina:
A pro-Cruz super PAC controlled by millionaire Robert Mercer (who had written checks for 5 million to Cruz’s effort) sent $500,0000 to Carly Fiorina’s super PAC. How often does it happen that a PAC for one candidate helps one of its rivals in a primary campaign? But New York Times reporter Amy Chozick cleared up the mystery when she tweeted:
“Fiorina finance chairs told me supporters of other candidates have thrown them $$$ to have a woman in race attacking HRC.”
Going hard after Clinton is job number one, and unlike her tenure as CEO of HP (and contrary to her claims about that in the debate last night) she’s doing it well.
But that is not to say she isn’t making a legitimate run for the nomination. She is, after all, a hard core conservative. How often do you find a candidate who has the ability to demagogue on Iran and Planned Parenthood in the same sentence? That’s a skill usually limited to only the best hate talk radio hosts. But Fiorina did it last night to great acclaim from right wingers and the media alike. Without taking a breath, she rattled off this speech in less than a minute:
“On day one in the Oval office I will make two phone calls the first to my good friend Bibi Netanyahu to assure him we will stand with the state of Israel. The second to the Supreme leader to tell him that unless and until he opens every nuclear facility to real anytime inspections by our people not his,we the United States of America will make it as difficult as possible to move money around the global financial system. We can do that we don’t need anyone’s cooperation to do it. And every ally and every adversary in this world will know that the United States of America is back in the leadership business which is how we must stand with out allies. As regards Planned Parenthood, anyone who has watched this videotape, I dare Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama to watch these tapes, watch a fully formed fetus on the table, it’s heart beating, its legs kicking while someone says we have to keep it alive to harvest its brain. This is about the character of our nation and if we will not stand up and force President Obama to veto this bill shame on us.”
Unfortunately, what she said about the tape is untrue. According to Sarah Kliff at Vox, who has watched the entire set of videos, there is no scene like this. (CNN Fact Check claimed the comment was “true but misleading” because the tape has an unrelated and out of context flash of a scene like this which was edited in after the fact by the videographers. That’s what would normally be called “false” or more precisely “a hoax”.) But it doesn’t matter. The folks in the audience loved it and judging by the Twitter commentary so did conservatives. After all, it may have been the most extreme rhetoric of the entire debate.
In fact, much of what Fiorina says is either untrue or incoherent, which her polished style of rapid-fire answers containing long lists of memorized specifics obscures. She is a master at what we used to call “dazzling them with BS.” She claims to have a well thought out plan for everything from dealing with the Ayatollah (only after conferring with her “good friend” Bibi Netanyahu) — by calling him up and demanding that he allows Americans to inspect his nuclear facilities anytime we choose or we’ll start “moving his money around the financial system” — to enlarging the sixth fleet and putting missile defense into Poland. The first bit of magical thinking is so common among the Republican candidates that it’s not worth commenting upon except to say that the presidency would be a part time job if it was that easy. As for her military “prescriptions,” let’s just say they are vacuous nonsense. Here’s what she said she would do about Russia
“What I would do, immediately, is begin rebuilding the Sixth Fleet, I would begin rebuilding the missile defense program in Poland, I would conduct regular, aggressive military exercises in the Baltic states. I’d probably send a few thousand more troops into Germany. Vladimir Putin would get the message. By the way, the reason it is so critically important that every one of us know General Suleimani’s name is because Russia is in Syria right now, because the head of the Quds force traveled to Russia and talked Vladimir Putin into aligning themselves with Iran and Syria to prop up Bashar al- Assad.”
That sounds very impressive, except, as Ezra Klein pointed out, the nuclear armed Sixth Fleet is gigantic already, the U.S. is already conducting military exercises in the Baltics and we already have 40,000 troops in Germany. Oh, and Vladimir Putin, General Suleimani and Bashar al-Assad will have been dead for decades, if not centuries, by the time a missile shield is installed in Poland.
Her comments on immigration were likewise factually challenged as was her tedious, mind-numbing list of alleged accomplishments as CEO of Hewlett Packard. (She’s been repeatedly fact checked on this and just keeps on saying it anyway.) She didn’t go into it last night, but in previous interviews her comments on climate change were wrong in every way.

Update: Politifact has this:

The Center for Medical Progress video does not show actually show footage of O’Donnell’s experience, and there’s nothing else in the video to corroborate O’Donnell’s story. Additionally, the supervisor in O’Donnell’s story does not say anything about keeping the fetus alive specifically for the purpose of harvesting the brain.
To dramatize O’Donnell’s interview, the video cuts to a fetus outside the womb, placed on what appears to be some sort of examination surface, and the fetus’ legs are moving. The Center for Medical Progress says the source of the footage is the Grantham Collection, an organization that hopes to stem abortion by promoting graphic images of the procedure. We don’t know the circumstances behind this video: where it came from, under what conditions it was obtained, or even if this fetus was actually aborted (as opposed to a premature birth or miscarriage). 

Our ruling 


Fiorina said one of the Planned Parenthood videos shows “a fully formed fetus on the table, its heart beating, its legs kicking, while someone says we have to keep it alive to harvest its brain.” 

One of the Center for Medical Progress’ videos attacking Planned Parenthood shows an interview with a woman identified as a former tissue procurement technician, who tells about an experience in a Planned Parenthood pathology lab where she sees a fetus outside the womb with its heart still beating. According to the woman, her supervisor said they would procure the fetus’ brain. The video’s creators added footage of an aborted fetus on what appears to be an examination table, and its legs are moving. But Fiorina makes it sound as if the footage shows what Planned Parenthood is alleged to have done. In fact, the stock footage was added to the video to dramatize its content. We rate her statement Mostly False.

Everything she says is mostly false.

.

“Bankruptcy Joe” Biden? Really? by @Gaius_Publius

“Bankruptcy Joe” Biden? Really?

by Gaius Publius

Student debt burden as of March 2015 (source)

As many readers know, I’m watching the Biden phenomenon (the “Biden bulge” in media attention) with interest. Part of this attention is driven by the Biden camp, but the media is playing its role by playing up the “Joe Biden, regular guy” angle, crossed with “Joe Biden, heartbroken father,” in a way that stamps his tentative entry into the Democratic primary with the Mainstream Media Seal of Approval. Heartbroken father he certainly is. “Regular guy” he’s not, as you’ll see shortly.

Yet if there’s critical big-media reporting on Biden — CBS, (MS)NBC, CNN, New York Times, etc. — I can’t find it. Even Stephen Colbert has blessed Biden in a way I can neither rewatch nor link to.

For his part, Biden’s playing coy, partly because he needs more than media blessing — he needs major insider blessing — before he can announce. In addition, Biden needs:

  • Hillary Clinton to falter, either publicly or privately
  • Bernie Sanders to fail to pick up Clinton supporters if she exits

About the first, Clinton faltering, several things could cause that. Clinton could lose the support she now enjoys among insiders who will never endorse Sanders. That loss of endorsement could occur publicly (she could stagger in the polls or in the first four or five races) or privately (a reason “she can’t win,” true or not, might spread among Democratic insiders, a reason that would not be shared with the public).

About the second, Sanders remaining unacceptable in Clinton’s absence, Biden needs to look “better than Clinton” to some Sanders- and Warren-supporting voters so that he can present himself to everyone as the acceptable “mainstream” alternative to Clinton. (Definition: Mainstream alternative means “someone who will keep the insider game going, making changes only at the margins, while appearing to be a populist.”)

One aspect of the insider game, for example, is high-speed Wall Street trading. It’s a license to print money, to steal from the trading floor. No “acceptable to insiders” candidate would offer to ban or tax that operation. Another is the racket called “student debt,” a license to steal huge amounts from college students and their parents. No “acceptable to insiders” candidate will do anything but offer forgiveness at the margins, as Obama has recently done.

This piece is about Joe Biden and the insider-protected student debt racket. (If you wish, you can help Sanders here; adjust the split any way you like at the link.)

Joe Biden and the Student Debt Crisis

As I write, the total student debt burden in the U.S. is $1.2 trillion. For comparison, total credit card debt in the U.S. is expected to be “just shy of $900 billion” by the end of 2015. How did total student debt get so large? Joe Biden helped.

Before Biden was rebranded as the kindly, well-liked Vice President, he was a long-serving senator from Delaware, the “senator from MBNA” as he was often called for a number of very good reasons. Delaware is the state that attracted a great many credit card company headquarters by offering little in the way of usury laws — limits to interest rates that banks could charge their customers. As a result, one of Delaware’s most important industries is those who profit from debt-creation.

Being in the consumer debt business, especially student debt and credit card debt, is a license to print money, and protecting that lucrative source of money is the job of Delaware senators like Biden, just as protecting Boeing’s access to government money via the Export-Import Bank is the job of senators like Washington’s Patty Murray, the so-called “senators from Boeing.”

Joe Biden is, and has been for years, a friend and enabler of his state’s debt industry. How much a friend? International Business Times (my emphasis throughout):

Joe Biden Backed Bills To Make It Harder For Americans To Reduce Their Student Debt

Jennifer Ryan did not love the idea of taking on debt, but she figured she was investing in her future. Eager to further her teaching career, she took out loans to gain certification and later pursued an advanced degree. But her studies came at a massive cost, leaving her confronting $192,000 in student loan debt.

“It’s overwhelming,” Ryan told International Business Times of her debts. “I can’t pay it back on the schedule the lenders have demanded.”

In the past, debtors in her position could have used bankruptcy court to shield them from some of their creditors. But a provision slipped into federal law in 2005 effectively bars most Americans from accessing bankruptcy protections for their private student loans.

In recent months, Democrats have touted legislation to roll back that law, as Americans now face more than $1.2 trillion in total outstanding debt from their government and private student loans. The bill is a crucial component of the party’s pro-middle-class economic message heading into 2016. Yet one of the lawmakers most responsible for limiting the legal options of Ryan and students like her is the man who some Democrats hope will be their party’s standard-bearer in 2016: Vice President Joe Biden.

Note the phrase “private student loans” in the next-to-last paragraph above. To understand why that’s important, you have to understand how the whole plunder operation works. Of the $1.2 trillion student debt, most is backed by the government in one form or another. That is, issuers of that debt have a guarantee from the government that if a loan goes bad, the government will make them whole with taxpayer money.

Thus, for lenders in the government-guaranteed loan program, there’s no way to lose money. In fact, the incentives make them issue as many student loans as they can, to as many people as they can, for any educational program under the sun — even, or especially, for programs at for-profit mills like Corinthian Colleges, Inc., where students almost never graduate with a degree.

It’s a racket all around, but especially at places like a Corinthian “campus.” As I wrote earlier, the plan at a place like that is simple:

Offer the least education you can get away with …
To the greatest number of students you can enroll …
Carrying the greatest debt burden you can saddle them with …
Then hope they drop out.

The faster students drop out (leave without a degree), the more classroom space is left for the next batch of debt-saddled enrollees.

But the predation isn’t limited to places like Corinthian. The whole system is a racket, which accounts for what’s shown in the chart at the top. Because of the highly profitable nature of the student loan program in general (loans earn interest until they are paid regardless of graduation or post-grad jobs), and because of the government guarantees and the number of loans issued, college tuition is encouraged to rise, which further encourages loan amounts to rise, which further increases profit from interest payments, in a near-endless cycle.

In fact, no one loses in this trillion-dollar operation but the students. Far too many students leave college with:

  • Sometimes a degree, sometimes not
  • Debt often as high as Jennifer Ryan’s in the example above ($192,000)
  • Little hope of discharging that debt with a service- or retail-sector job (iPhone sales, Starbucks coffee-puller, all the cool jobs in this left-behind economy)
  • Interest payments for the rest of their working lives, or most of it

It’s a predatory racket, and the government is part of it, in fact, its chief enabler.

“Private” Student Debt and Joe Biden

Not all student debt is government-guaranteed. Some students make the mistake of going directly to a private lender for education loans, bypassing the government-guaranteed system. Of the $1.2 trillion in total student debt, about $150 billion is private debt — at-risk debt, from the standpoint of the issuer, since if the borrower (the student) could discharge that debt via bankruptcy, the lender would lose the principal of the loan. No government guarantee as a backstop against failure to pay.

For lenders of private education loans, that was a problem that needed solving. Which is where Joe Biden comes in. Biden helped close the bankruptcy loophole in 2005 by making sure borrowers couldn’t discharge their private student debt via bankruptcy court. IBD again:

As a senator from Delaware — a corporate tax haven where the financial industry is one of the state’s largest employers — Biden was one of the key proponents of the 2005 legislation that is now bearing down on students like Ryan. That bill effectively prevents the $150 billion worth of private student debt from being discharged, rescheduled or renegotiated as other debt can be in bankruptcy court.

Joe Biden, senator from MBNA, served the money that kept him in office. Here’s Howie, writing in 2007, about that 2005 law:

One of the most hated pieces of legislation to come out of the heinous Bush Regime was the 2005 Bankruptcy Bill, a law put together by the credit card industry and pushed primarily by corrupt members of Congress– on both sides of the aisle– who get gigantic payoffs from these same companies. The bill poisoned progressives against bought-off reactionary Democrats like Joe Biden (D-DE) and Al Wynn (D-MD).

Back to IBD:

Biden’s efforts in 2005 were no anomaly. Though the vice president has long portrayed himself as a champion of the struggling middle class — a man who famously commutes on Amtrak and mixes enthusiastically with blue-collar workers — the Delaware lawmaker has played a consistent and pivotal role in the financial industry’s four-decade campaign to make it harder for students to shield themselves and their families from creditors, according to an IBT review of bankruptcy legislation going back to the 1970s.

Biden’s political fortunes rose in tandem with the financial industry’s. At 29, he won the first of seven elections to the U.S. Senate, rising to chairman of the powerful Judiciary Committee, which vets bankruptcy legislation. On that committee, Biden helped lenders make it more difficult for Americans to reduce debt through bankruptcy — a trend that experts say encouraged banks to loan more freely with less fear that courts could erase their customers’ repayment obligations. At the same time, with more debtors barred from bankruptcy protections, the average American’s debt load went up by two-thirds over the last 40 years. Today, there is more than $10,000 of personal debt for every person in the country, as compared to roughly $6,000 in the early 1970s.

That increase — and its attendant interest payments — have generated huge profits for a financial industry that delivered more than $1.9 million of campaign contributions to Biden over his career, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.

This is “retail” politics, as in “retail sales” — things bought and sold. People like Joe Biden sell their services to the very wealthy — in Biden’s case, to the consumer debt industry and their CEOs — for almost $2 million in “campaign contributions,” and they in turn become even wealthier, all at the expense of people like you and me.

See why I say Joe Biden’s no “regular guy” or friend of working women and men? He’s in fact the opposite. He worked for the people who prey on them. He’s the reason so many of them are as deep in debt as they are. Biden helped keep them in debt.

The senator from MBNA in action

Yet if Clinton falters, the party may turn to him. If so, he will turn to “Bernie Sanders Democrats” for their blessing. Will they remember enough about Biden to withhold it (like his role in putting Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court)? It’s an interesting question.

Will “Bernie Sanders Democrats” Be Taken in by “Bankruptcy Joe” Biden?

It would be incredibly ironic, wouldn’t it, if the very people savaged by the industry Biden served — the consumer and student debt industry — were to fall for Biden’s “man of the people” shtick and turn to him as the acceptable mainstream alternative to Hillary Clinton.

Clinton has a “friend of money” tag on her, one she’s trying (I think) to get rid of. Biden should wear that tag as well, on his forehead, despite the public media blessing he gets from (I shudder to recall it) people like Stephen Colbert, who really should know better.

“Bankruptcy Joe” Biden, has a ring to it. Maybe someone should tell Colbert about this stuff. He may want to “correct the record” with an interview do-over.

(A version of this piece appeared at Down With Tyranny. GP article archive here.)

GP

.

SuperCarlyTrumpoliciousExtraBraggadocious by @BloggersRUs

SuperCarlyTrumpoliciousExtraBraggadocious
by Tom Sullivan

“I’m Donald Trump. I wrote the art of the deal. I say not in a braggadocious way. I’ve made billions and billions of dollars.”

Something Teagan Goddard said about last night’s debate keys into something I observed:

Carly Fiorina was an obvious winner because she was clear, forceful and stood out among the 11 candidates on stage. Ben Carson was a winner, because he rose above the food fight. Donald Trump dominated the air time once again but likely won over few new supporters. It speaks volumes that all three have never been elected to anything.

Carson was a snooze, as Digby observed. But if anyone gained ground last night it was Fiorina. Her fabricated attack on Planned Parenthood aside, she drew wild applause for her smackdown of Trump over his comments about her face:

“I think women all over this country heard very clearly what Mr. Trump said.”

She was well rehearsed.

But the spectacle of the never-elected Fiorina and Trump bragging about their questionable skills in running businesses as qualifications for running a country was disturbing. Business, the logic of the marketplace, has become the raison d’être of American governance since Reagan. The ascendancy of the logic of the corporation (and its capture of the levers of government) parallels the decline in the American middle class over the last decades. Americans are feeling the pinch, the middle-class squeeze of which Sen. Elizabeth Warren speaks, and on which Bernie Sanders campaigns.

And if the after-action reports on the second GOP debate come in as expected, to whom are struggling Americans turning for salvation? To people who offer more of the very same corporate opiate, only in purer form.

Fiorina’s rise

Fiorina’s rise

by digby

Just a little note about her claims to have risen from the bowels of the pink collar ghetto as a secretary: it’s not exactly true. She did work as a part time secretary during her summers while in college and briefly as a receptionist for a real estate firm between dropping out of law school and getting her MBA. When she graduated from business school she entered AT&T’s management training program and was promoted through that.  She didn’t start out in the typing pool. Very few women did. No matter how well you did your job in those days — and many women were the ones who actually did the work of the executives they served — there was virtually no way to break out except in rare cases you might get a middle management gig in human resources or administration.

That is not to say that very many women rose through management training programs either and I don’t want to cast too many aspersions on her achievement in rising to the top of a corporation.  It is still rare, no matter the route to get there. But Fiorina’s myth is designed to make it sound as though she rose up from the very bottom and that’s just not true. She had an MBA and was anointed from the beginning of her career as a woman headed for the executive suite.  Good for her.  But she’s not a working class hero.

.

Trump and his great big gun

Trump and his great big gun

by digby

Trump gave an exciting speech last night at the USS Iowa. His fans were delirious. Here’s a video of the event you can watch while you wait for the big debate:

“Bing, bong … when we were strong …”

“Bing, bong … when we were strong …”

by digby



Everybody’s been laughing Trump off from the beginning. But as they watch their anointed “mainstream” candidates sink like rocks in the polls, the establishment is starting to sweat. I wrote about it for Salon this morning.

As we await how they choose to confront him tonight, you might find it interesting to read. An excerpt:

Let’s face it, Trump sounds more like a cheap gangster than a politician most of the time. His rhetoric is full of threats and swaggering braggadocio. That’s just who he is. When he sounds like a cheap cartoon villain saying “I hope they attack me, because everybody who attacks me is doomed,” that’s what his followers like about him. But what’s even more interesting is the fact that the political media seems to be adopting his rhetorical style. Trumpism must be catching.
Take, for example, the usually mild-mannered Mark Halperin, the man who sets the beltway’s daily mood and passes down the approved talking points. Check out how he described the Trump situation going into tonight’s debate:
Publicly, former Texas Governor Rick Perry ended his presidential run on Fridayafternoon. Privately, those who do this for a living used a bloodier term of the trade: He was killed (politically, of course), the first of what may turn into many campaign scalps claimed by the fiercest killer in this race, Trump.
In the modern era, the Republican nomination has been won by the combatant who is best at playing a game of kill-or-be-killed. In the end, becoming the standard bearer has not been about the daily polls, the staff hires, the policy speeches, the fundraising, the cattle calls, the promised agenda. It’s been about having the skill and confidence to stamp out anyone who threatens you, using a combination of negative TV ads, candidate and major surrogate attacks, and planted opposition research.
All the Republican presidential nominees since 1988 have deployed these weapons in a rapid-fire flurry of assaults. The losers failed to respond quickly, handle the pressure, or maintain image control—and were pulverized. You win the nomination when you define yourself on your own (positive) terms and force your opponent to be defined in the public eye on negative terms. That is how you kill the enemy and prevail.
And to think I once thought the inevitable macho sports metaphors were creepy.
This is Trumpism run amok. And Halperin has caught a bad case of it. Scalping andassaulting and stomping and pulverizing — it almost makes Trump’s little references to “counter-punching” sound, dare I say it, a little weak. But regardless of his excessive rhetorical violence, Halperin is reflecting a very real concern among Republicans who are beginning to seriously worry that Trump is right: They are doomed. And they just might be. The New York Times revealed last night that their latest polling shows that only 15 percent of Republicans would not back Donald Trump if he were to get the nomination. Roll that around in your mind for a moment.
And it appears that the 15 percent who refuse are all members of the Republican Party elite. Bill Kristol is probably the most openly hystericalm but he’s likely representative of most of his buds when he says, “I doubt I’d support Donald. I doubt I’d support the Democrat. I think I’d support getting someone good on the ballot as a third party candidate.” (His choice would be Dick Cheney. Seriously.) Then again, this is the man who “discovered” Sarah Palin, so perhaps his electoral instincts aren’t all that reliable. Nonetheless, Trump seems to be sapping his confidence:
“I’ve wondered if I’ve had it backwards. Maybe I’m wrong … I kept saying ‘it’s not going to happen, it would be so unusual,’ but I don’t know.”
The Masters of the Universe are even more concerned. Politico reports that Wall Street is calling for the fainting couch:
[A] dozen Wall Street executives interviewed for this article could not say what might dent Trump’s appeal or when it might happen. ‘I don’t know anyone who is a Donald Trump supporter. I don’t know anyone who knows anyone who is a Donald Trump supporter. They are like this huge mystery group,” the CEO said…” So it’s a combination of shock and bewilderment. No one really knows why this is happening.”
Imagine that. If a CEO doesn’t know anyone who likes Trump can they possibly exist? According to the article they’ve all gone a little sour on Bush, Walker and Rubio and are so desperate they’re looking to John Kasich because, according to one top New York Republican, he’s “a true businessman in contrast to Trump,” which proves just how frightened they are. For all the things Trump pretends he is, if there’s one title he can legitimately claim, “true businessman” is it. (Bankruptcies be damned.) Kasich by contrast is a career politician who left and went to work for Lehman brothers for a few years to make his bundle marketing his political contacts.
Halperin writes that these panicked political and business elites have been unable to agree on the best way to “take [Trump] out” and offers up a few different possible scenarios he heard from his sources.

Read on to see their laughable plans. They are sounding desperate. And the media seems to be taking on the cartoon dialog of the Trump campaign. Which is darkly humorous in a creepy “Goodfellas” sort of way.

QOTD: yet another xenophobe

QOTD: yet another xenophobe

by digby

The Trump phenomenon is being treated like a big curiosity by all the pundits. But the truth is that xenophobes have been out there screaming about the foreign hordes for quite some time.

Here’s another one who thinks that we are about to be overrun with terrorists and that we need to arm up. You may remember this gun range owner from last year when she banned Muslims from her business:

This is not a coffee and donut shop. This is a live fire indoor shooting range. People come here to buy, rent, and shoot lethal weapons.

In the range, people are shooting guns in close proximity to each other, so my patrons depend on me and my discretion regarding who I allow to shoot beside them.

One mistake in judgement [sic] on my part could cost innocent people their lives.

Now she is speaking out about the possibility that the US may generously take 10,000 Syrian refugees and the threat they obviously pose. She appeared on Fox where the host asked her a very interesting question:

You have to worry about guns getting into the hands of the wrong people, so when you look at the idea of President Obama bringing 10,000 refugees in, many of whom could be extreme Muslims, that worries you, yes?

Guns could get into the hands of the wrong people? Say it ain’t so!