Skip to content

Month: March 2016

The GOP’s reckoning by @BloggersRUs

The GOP’s reckoning
by Tom Sullivan


“What does not kill me, makes me stronger.” – Friedrich Nietzsche
(By Hartmann, Basel. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons)

Much digital ink has been spread about how Republicans created Donald Trump and now are paying the price for it. But Trump is not the only nemesis they helped create.

First, writing yesterday from Chattanooga, Tennessee, Charlie Pierce spoke of the Super Tuesday reckoning facing the Republican party:

The facts are as stark as the slopes of Lookout Mountain in the early morning light. It is a consummation devoutly to be wished, especially by those of us who see the Republicans as having been cruising for this particular bruising ever since it so greedily ate the monkeybrains in the 1980s. But, from the people who make their living at being Republicans, we are seeing the kind of existential panic that you only see once or twice in a century. It’s Watership Down, with Super PACs and Mitch McConnell.

Indeed, this morning’s online headline at the Washington Post described it as a “nightmarish Super Tuesday” for the GOP establishment. Trump won seven of the states in play. Hillary Clinton also won seven Super Tuesday states.

Paul Krugman yesterday tweeted a Storify by hilzoy explaining “how cynical know-nothingism led to Trump.” Having spent decades and billions to systematically inoculate their base against the truth and to undermine confidence in government, politics and politicians, the GOP and its allies now find themselves choking on the fallout from their own weapons of mass deception. Hilzoy explains that GOP supporters’ capacity to trust anyone – including the GOP – has been destroyed.

In engineering this autoimmune disease, the Machiavellis of the vast right-wing conspiracy forgot their Nietzsche. Twenty-five years of near-constant political assault was not potent enough to destroy Hillary Clinton. Now, not only is the Republican Party facing a Trump of its own creation, but a stronger Hillary Clinton as well.

Clinton spoke last month with Anderson Cooper about the years of attacks:

“It is a brutal experience and when it first started happening to me … I was just stunned. I could not understand how they got away with it.

“So now that I’ve been through this for so many years,” the former first lady continued, “my understanding of the political tactics that the other side uses is pretty well versed. They play to keep. They play to destroy.

“I know I have to keep defending against them,” Clinton added. “But I’m the one who has the experience to do that.

Like a punching clown, you can knock Hillary Clinton down, but she just will not stay down. Which is why they fear her.

Trump’s mob

Trump’s mob

by digby

I don’t know what to say about this except … yikes:

The 29-year-old Mandel, who writes for The Federalist, a conservative/libertarian web site that often inveighs against Trump, is a pugnacious online presence who frequently crosses swords with self-avowed acolytes of the Republican presidential frontrunner.

She has especially tangled with Breitbart News, the rabble-rousing, Trump-friendly Web site—named for its late founder, culture warrior Andrew Breitbart—that regularly savages the GOP establishment, the media elite, the Washington consultant class, and the Fox News Channel, which it likes to portray as the willing enabler of all these sinister forces.

“When I went to my local police department and applied for the gun permit, they said, ‘Maybe you should stop writing things that make people angry,’” Mandel recounts. “And I said, ‘OK, I’ll give that some consideration.’

‘You have kids. Why would you do that?’

‘Because I want to leave them a world that is worth living in.’”

Yet one can hardly fault Mandel’s feelings of vulnerability. Typical online insults (screenshots of which she provided to The Daily Beast) included “you deserve the oven,” complete with the image of a Domino’s Pizza oven—this from an apparent Trump fan who goes by the Twitter handle @dinguscout.

After Mandel observed: “Another night blocking all the anti-Semites who are helping Trump make American[sic] great again,” a second apparent Trump supporter, @unusr1, tweeted at her: “Missed one, you slimy Jewess.”

It is entirely predictable that, among other news outlets—including The Drudge Report, The New York Times and The Washington Post—the Twitter feeds of Mandel’s Trump-fan assailants often include links to stories on Breitbart News, and even to audio clips from Breitbart News Daily, the SiriusXM satellite radio program hosted by Breitbart executive chairman Stephen K. Bannon and Breitbart News editor in chief Alex Marlow.

Nick-named “Trumpbart” by detractors, the outlet claims 17 million readers, and is widely seen as a credulous purveyor of Trump’s angry populist, anti-immigration, anti-Muslim message, and as an enthusiastic booster of the reality show billionaire’s candidacy.

Thus Mandel—who prefers Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio or, as a desperate last resort, even Hillary Clinton to Trump—recently engaged in an online skirmish with Breitbart’s Washington political editor, Matthew Boyle.

The night of last Thursday’s raucous Republican debate in Houston—which the mainstream media reported as the frontrunner’s defensive attempts to fend off sharp attacks by Rubio and Cruz—the 28-year-old Boyle tweeted: “The story of the night: @realDonaldTrump: ‘WE ARE BUILDING A NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY.’”

Mandel retorted: “A dispatch from Trump headquarters, delivered via their secretly paid surrogate.”

“I wish I got paid,” Boyle replied to Mandel, rejecting an oft-denied but persistent rumor that Trump allegedly helps finance the news site. “I don’t [get paid] by anyone other than Breitbart & Breitbart is completely independent of any candidates.”

Mandel has disregarded the recent warning of a Trump fan with the Twitter handle @johnny-nimble.

“Never fuck with Breitbart. Ever,” @johnny-nimble cautioned.

This pseudonymous tweeter had earlier answered Mandel’s observation—“I never received so many anti-Semitic tweets since Trump’s rise. Not even when I tweeted about Israel during wars”—with the vow: “Ain’t seen nothing yet.”

Both Bannon and Marlow disown such malevolence.

“It has nothing to do with Breitbart—we don’t direct people on social media,” Marlow tells The Daily Beast. “I think this is more about what it’s like in the Twitterverse. It’s toxic the way we talk to one another in that place.”

Bannon, meanwhile, calls the notion that his news site is stoking the ugliness “absurd.”

But, he adds, “If a guy comes after our audience—starts calling working-class people vulgarians and brownshirts and Nazis and post-literate—we’re going to leave a mark. We’re not shy about it at all. We’ve got some lads that like to mix it up.”

Trump naysayer and Breitbart critic John Podhoretz, editor of the neoconservative journal Commentary, received the Breitbart treatment in an article that derided him as a “boorish” establishment pundit who “likes to throw hissy fits” and “believes the ‘unwashed masses’ should not know about the cozy and incestuous relationships in the permanent political and media class that Trump is exposing.”

Podhoretz compares Breitbart News to a fanzine. “They’re like a Tiger Beat for Trump, a Sixteen magazine for Trump. It’s kind of a nonsense fan site,” he says.

Without asserting a cause-and-effect relationship, Podhoretz says that in the months since being featured on Breitbart he’s traded Twitter insults daily with “literally neo-Nazi White supremacists, all anonymous… and there is some overlap here [with Breitbart and Trump]. Something happened in 2015 with the emergence of Trump—who I’m loath to admit has millions of people who are going to end up voting for him, and it looks like he’ll be the Republican nominee for president.

“I don’t think I can attribute being a supporter of Trump to being a validator or an expresser of these opinions,” Podhoretz continues, “but something was let loose by him. This code language—‘It’s time to stop being politically correct’—is something he never defines. One can presume what he meant by it is that before you were not allowed to say Mexicans should be deported, Muslims should be arrested or to talk about the terrorism problem or the Muslim problem. It’s liberating, but there’s no limiting factor, and somehow he has let loose this dark force and turned over these rocks.”

Podhoretz adds: “I feel no compunction about insulting and making fun of these anti-Semites on Twitter, which makes my wife nervous. She thinks I should stop it.”

Radio host and conservative activist Erick Erickson, another prominent Trump detractor, has been the target of unpleasant and occasionally threatening communications from anonymous Trump enthusiasts.

Erickson says that in the wake of Breitbart News stories concerning his anti-Trump statements and actions, he and his family have been victimized by a torrent of abuse from anonymous strangers—not only online, but via letters in his mail box, phone calls to his home, and worse, prompting the occasional complaint to law enforcement authorities.

“There have been a couple of staff-reporter pieces on Breitbart, and Trump himself has come after me on Twitter,” says the Georgia-based Erickson, the former chief executive of the conservative site RedState, who famously disinvited Trump from a RedState gathering last August after the candidate attacked Fox News’s Megyn Kelly with an apparently misogynistic reference to her menstrual cycle. (Erickson is a Fox News contributor.)

Shortly after Erickson issued his condemnation of the candidate, he was featured in an Aug. 11 Breitbart story that led with Trump’s tweet calling him “a major sleaze and buffoon who has saved me time and money.”

“The Donald may be on to something,” opined Breitbart News’s Kevin Scholla, adding that Erickson is a hypocrite and a “RINO on steroids.”

“Somehow or other, our address got out there,” Erickson says, “and for awhile, my wife and I have had to have our mail screened and won’t let the kids get the mail. It’s pretty nasty, angry mail, more unhinged than I expected, with vulgarities written on the outside of the envelope. ‘Fuck you,’ ‘Go to hell,’ that kind of thing.”

Erickson says that as a result of his dustup with Trump, “some of my advertisers on my radio show were harassed by clearly organized phone calls to get them to ditch me as an advertiser. All of them very graciously stood by me.”

Florida Republican political consultant Rick Wilson, an ardent supporter of Rubio—whom Breitbart’s writers continually portray as a liar who favors amnesty for illegals—has become a favorite Breitbart target since Trump’s rise in public opinion polls.

During a confrontational CNN appearance opposite Breitbart’s Marlow in August, Wilson derided the news site as Trump’s “Pravda” and referred to Trump fans as “low-information supporters.”

The next day, Bannon used his radio show to essentially declare war on the Rubio backer. He referred to Wilson as “a Republican paid consultant [who] viciously attacked the grass roots.”

The bald, bespectacled Wilson, who has written for The Daily Beast, quickly became a Breitbart whipping boy in a series of articles that variously described him as “Republican establishment cheerleader” and “Gollum-in-glasses” (Breitbart columnist John Nolte’s epithet is a reference to the slimy, power-mad character in Lord of the Rings.).

“It was a planned deployment,” Wilson says. “After I criticized Breitbart and criticized Trump, they decided they were going to weaponize themselves and go after me.”

Around the same time, Wilson says, strange and alarming incidents began befalling him and members of his family.

Internal emails obtained by The Daily Beast indicate that Bannon and Breitbart’s Boyle worked to obtain a comprehensive list of Wilson’s political clients (with the intention of making them feel uncomfortable about hiring him, Wilson believes).

Around the same time, Breitbart reporter Katie McHugh “made repeated calls to the press office of my U.S. Senate candidate [Rubio ally Carlos Lopez Cantera], asking, ‘When will you fire Rick Wilson?’” he says.

A list of questions emailed by a Breitbart reporter to the Cantera campaign cited Wilson’s retweeting of blog post in which Breitbart News was criticized as “racist,” and demanded, “Why are you employing someone who is calling conservatives racists?’” (Breitbart editor in chief Marlow defended the tone of the inquiry. “When a staffer/consultant voluntarily puts opinions into the public domain,” he emailed, “it is absolutely appropriate to ask the people he represents if that viewpoint is a reflection of how they feel as well. If they don’t like that, maybe they should instruct their consultants to be more guarded about their personal opinions. We will aggressively pursue stories like this in the future.”)

Meanwhile, Wilson says he learned that his credit report had been ordered by an unknown third party, and anonymous trolls—some apparently active on an online forum associated with white supremacists—posted photoshopped sexual images of his college-age daughter, claimed she’d had a child with an African American, threatened gang-rape, and claimed Wilson’s teenage son was a pimp.

When Wilson tweeted complaints about the online abuse, Breitbart’s Nolte accused him of “us[ing] a threat of rape against his own daughter as a political talking point to attack Breitbart News.” The situation got even more heated when Trump backer Ann Coulter tweeted: “Hilarious public meltdown: THEY’RE THREATENING TO RAPE MY DAUGHTER! #RickWilsonIsAGirlInAPinkPartyDress”—and Wilson replied to Coulter, “Does Trump pay you more for anal?”

Prompted by his wife Molly, who was less than thrilled with her spouse’s crude riposte, Wilson deleted the offending tweet and apologized, but not to Coulter.

“My comment was shocking to many of you,” he tweeted to his followers, “and for that I offer a sincere apology. I’m more sorry for the people this impacted in my family, and my circle of friends.” (Breitbart News, of course, covered Wilson’s angry outburst in excruciating detail.)

Meanwhile, according to Molly Wilson, an art gallery owner, the “targeted harassment” against her family, as she calls it, has included deliveries of unordered pizzas, packing boxes, Qurans and various religious tracts, incessant prank phone calls and, earlier this month, a bogus Craigslist ad for a yard sale at their home.

“It said we were selling and giving away the entire contents of our house because we were going to Africa for mission work,” she says. “People were coming up to the house and driving into our yard.”

Early one morning, Rick, an avid gun enthusiast, “almost killed a guy on the back porch who was looking in with a flashlight,” Molly Wilson says.

“If there’s one guy on earth I wouldn’t fuck with, it’s a guy who builds AR-15’s as a hobby,” says Wilson’s close friend, fellow Rubio backer and Republican consultant Jacob Perry (also a Breitbart target, who says he sustained a sore thumb from the repetitive stress of blocking hundreds of nasty tweeters, and also fielded half a dozen abusive phone calls and voicemail messages from anonymous apparent Trump supporters, after the news site profiled him as a member of “The Consultant Class” experiencing a “serial-meltdown over the rise of Donald Trump”).

Trump campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks didn’t respond to a detailed email requesting comment, though Trump acolyte Roger Stone, a longtime operative famous for his hardball tactics, speculates that whatever trouble Wilson has experienced “is probably the handiwork of overzealous and misguided supporters of Trump. The idea that Trump himself or his people would do this is absurd. They have bigger fish to fry. When you go on social media and say controversial things, you’re going to have consequences. If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.”

In an interview, Bannon claimed zero knowledge of the misery allegedly being visited upon Wilson and his family, but Breitbart’s publicist, Kurt Bardella, wrote in a follow-up email: “Bannon wanted to make sure you knew and had in the story that the direction on Rick Wilson came from him specifically.”

Bannon revels in what he likes to call a Fight Club ethos. A Breitbart insider, who spoke on condition of anonymity, says that “they’re the kind of people who, if you accidentally brushed against their shopping cart in the supermarket, their response is to burn down your house.”

Asked about this characterization, Bannon didn’t deny it. Quite the opposite, he laughed uproariously.

This never-back-down philosophy was reflected in the way top editor Marlow responded when presented with a series of tweets by Breitbart reporter Katie McHugh that many people would find highly offensive. Among them: “It’s important to keep families together. We must deport anchor babies along with their illegal alien parents”; “Mexicans wrecked Mexico & think invading the USA will magically cure them of their retarded dysfunction. LOL”; and “Indian tribes never bothered to build any kind of civilization. They killed each other and chased bison. Yawn~”.

Marlow’s reaction: “Neither Steve nor I are big fans of Twitter, but after reviewing these tweets, we’re considering giving Katie a weekly column.”
Perhaps such a column could elaborate on a McHugh tweet from last September: “British settlers built the USA. “Slaves” built the country much as cows “built” McDonald’s. Amateur…”
The site has been especially disparaging of Florida Sen. Rubio, the reality show billionaire’s most persistent antagonist in the recent days, and a declared enemy of Breitbart during an appearance a week ago Saturday on the Fox News Channel.

Rubio condemned the news site, claiming “they’re basically conspiracy theories and oftentimes manipulated.” He added, “We don’t even credential them for our events.”

Breitbart.com fired back a few hours later with a story by Washington political editor Boyle under the headline: “Full Panic Mode: Rubio Caught Lying…” and pointing out that Rubio had given an interview only a few days earlier to Breitbart reporter Charlie Spierling.

“We’re going to be relentless on Rubio,” Bannon promises. “Every time he opens his mouth he virtually has a misrepresentation, and if Fox is not going to hold him accountable, and the rest of the Republican media establishment who depends on Fox, if they’re not going to correct him, then we’re going to be guardians of truth. We’ve never had to retract one thing we’ve written about Rubio. They’ve never asked for a correction. Trust me, brother, we’re coming. We’re not backing off.”

“I don’t have anything to add to what Marco said on FOX,” Rubio campaign spokesman Alex Conant emailed The Daily Beast.

As for Matthew Boyle, jaws dropped during a recent dinner attended by political journalists—around the time of the Iowa caucuses, according to a witness—when he was heard boasting that he will be named White House press secretary in the incoming Trump administration.

It wasn’t clear if Boyle was joking, says the witness, when he announced that one of his first acts on behalf of President Trump will be to ban Fox News from the White House press room. “I talk a lot of trash at private dinners over beers—just like any guy from Boston,” Boyle emailed The Daily Beast when asked about these comments. “Deal with it.”

Ok….

Hitlers aren’t “tameable”

Hitlers aren’t “tameable”

by digby

A midwestern couple named Jon and Elsa Sands wrote a letter to the editor that’s making the rounds:

Sir, My wife and I are affluent Americans with postgraduate degrees. We are socially liberal and fiscally mildly conservative. We are not the sans-culottes you see as the prototypical Trump voter. We are well aware of his vulgarity and nous deficiency yet we contemplate voting for him. Why?

Electing the standard-bearer of the Democratic Party seems purposeless. The neanderthal Republicans barely respected the legitimacy of Bill Clinton’s or Barack Obama’s election, let alone that of Hillary who would arrive tainted with scandal and the email lapses hanging over her head. We would get four years of gridlock and “hearings”. The Republican tribunes, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, are backward, foolish and inexperienced. John Kasich, a moderate with extensive governmental experience and a willingness to compromise, is an also-ran. That leaves The Donald, really a moderate in wolf’s garb, who would owe nothing to either party and might strike deals, for instance on tax reform.

Yes, we could be like the good citizens who voted for a “tameable” Hitler in 1933 to get things back on track. But the alternatives look worse.

I have listened to a whole lot of Trump’s speeches, more than I care to admit. (I get OAN network which shows almost all of them in complete form with no talking heads.) I listen to what he says.

This woman does not, obviously. She hears what she wants to hear and filters out the rest:

Sands, who teaches English to refugees and described herself as a big supporter of refugee resettlement, said that even though Trump is a “big jerk, brash, over the top and egomaniacal” he was also a “big-mouth pragmatist who can get things done.” She also said that he was a moderate who “doesn’t go around hating people” and called him a “brilliant communicator.”

“He tends to be flamboyant and like New Yorkers talks in hyperbole,” Sands said. “He exaggerated it to get attention, because a moderate cannot run in the Republican Party.” Sands believes that the media has “distorted” Trump’s statements and are making him out to be someone they want him to be.

“He’s not one of them,” Sands said. “He’s a Rockefeller Republican. There aren’t any more of those around.”

The couple believes that the Republicans consider Democratic presidents to be illegitimate and will not make deals or compromise with them. “They set out to destroy Obama,” Sands said. “What are they going to do to Hillary who carries all this baggage with her?”

Sands, who voted for Obama in 2008, and who has worked for liberal causes, said it was Trump who supported Planned Parenthood after the Republicans “trashed it.”

She said that the Republican party leadership dislike Trump because they believe he will destroy the party. “That might be a reason to vote for him,” she said.

She said that with a “corrupt Hillary, silly little Rubio, and mean-spirited Ted Cruz,” they have “nowhere else to go” besides Trump, even though she admitted she was nervous about considering voting for him.

“It’s a very scary hope, if we vote for him, that he might be pragmatic and listen to advisers,” Sands said. “It’s a sorry state we’ve come to that we have Trump running out there and we’re considering voting for him.”

Yes it is. It’s terrifying, actually.

He doesn’t go around hating people? Seriously?

“Mayor Koch has stated that hate and rancor should be removed from our hearts. I do not think so. I want to hate these muggers and murderers. They should be forced to suffer and, when they kill, they should be executed for their crimes. They must serve as examples so that others will think long and hard before committing a crime or an act of violence.” 

“Yes, Mayor Koch. I want to hate these murderers and I always will. I am not looking to psychoanalyze or understand them. I am looking to punish them. If the punishment is strong, the attacks on innocent people will stop. I recently watched a newscast trying to explain the “anger in these young men.” I no longer want to understand their anger. I want them to understand our anger. I want them to be afraid.

They were innocent.

When they were released and the city settled years later he called the settlement “a disgrace.”

And then there’s this:

Just because Trump promises to make the trains run on time and likes dogs and children, it doesn’t make him a moderate.

QOTD: The Ben Carson campaign

QOTD: The Ben Carson campaign

by digby

When asked how they expected to win the race:

“Well, we clearly don’t know. We don’t have a well defined path to victory,” Carson campaign chairman Bob Dees told the Washington Examiner Tuesday in an interview. “But we think the opportunity still exists for people to wake up and that’s what we’re hoping.” 

“Thomas Jefferson talked about that. He said that democracy depends on well-informed voters,” Dees continued. “He also said that he thought America would go down this path and the people would be manipulated [but] just before it was too late, people would wake up and regain their senses and start doing the right thing. We are hopeful that that occurs, and that along the way, people start doing the right thing.”

Just don’t wake up before you send the last few dollars in your savings account to Ben Carson’s magical presidential campaign headquarters. Somebody’s going to need a fancy vacation this summer.

.

Suddenly they notice that some of their flock are lying hypocrites

Suddenly they notice that some of their flock are lying hypocrites

by digby

This piece by Southern Baptist Convention’s Russell Moore in today’s Washington Post is more evidence that the schisms on the right are not just confined to the DC/grassroots.  It’s happening on all fronts and the Christian Right is yet another example:

The word “evangelical” has become almost meaningless this year, and in many ways the word itself is at the moment subverting the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Part of the problem is that more secular people have for a long time misunderstood the meaning of “evangelical,” seeing us almost exclusively in terms of election-year voting blocs or our most buffoonish television personalities. That’s especially true when media don’t distinguish in election exit polls between churchgoers and those who merely self-identify as “born again” or “evangelical.”

Many of those who tell pollsters they are “evangelical” may well be drunk right now, and haven’t been into a church since someone invited them to Vacation Bible School sometime back when Seinfeld was in first-run episodes.

The other problem is the behavior of some evangelical leaders. I have watched as some of these who gave stem-winding speeches about “character” in office during the Clinton administration now minimize the spewing of profanities in campaign speeches, race-baiting and courting white supremacists, boasting of adulterous affairs, debauching public morality and justice through the casino and pornography industries.

I watched one evangelical leader pronounce a candidate a Christian, though he explicitly states that he has never repented of sin, because he displays the fruit of the Spirit in job creation. That’s not a political problem; it’s a gospel problem.

Why are many evangelical leaders, including some who pontificate on nearly everything else, scared silent as evangelicalism is associated with everything from authoritarianism and bigotry to violations of religious freedom? How can they look the other way in silence when politicians praise Planned Parenthood and demur about white supremacists and neo-Nazis?

Worst of all, what happens when evangelicalism is no longer even clear about what it takes to be saved: repentance from sin and personal trust in Jesus Christ?

For years, secular progressives have said that evangelical social action in America is not about religious conviction but all about power. They have implied that the goal of the Religious Right is to cynically use the “moral” to get to the “majority,” not the other way around.

This year, a group of high-profile old-guard evangelicals has proven these critics right.

For some reason I don’t think this is something that just materialized this year. I’m fairly sure that all this phony evangelicalism has been around for many a moon. But everyone was content to pretend that there was a gigantic faction of devout Bible-believing Christians who were obsessed with the breakdown of moral values in our country. It served the right wing well to ignore the divorce rates and vast numbers of teen-age pregnancies and drug addiction and crime among their alleged moral majority, particularly in Southern states so they could preen about “moral authority” and “traditional values.”

This is nothing new — it’s been there for a very long time. It’s just that now Donald Trump has given these debauched, authoritarian white nationalists someone who really represents them.

.

“Build a wall, build a wall — brick by brick. Obama you’re fired”

“Build a wall, build a wall — brick by brick. Obama you’re fired”

by digby

Bun B is a Houston-based MC, activist, and Rice University lecturer, who makes up one half of the legendary rap duo U.G.K. that’s credited with pioneering the sound of Southern hip hop. He’s also VICE’s newest political correspondent, covering the garish and unpredictable rockfight that is the 2016 presidential race.

This week, we sent him to join the traveling circus in South Carolina, where Donald Trump is expected to win the Republican primary on Saturday. For a two days, he immersed himself in the state’s red-meat brand of conservative politics, talking to the Tea Partiers, Trump supporters, and GOP presidential candidates to find out what’s really going on in the lead up to the first Southern primary vote of 2016.




Back in the 40s and 50s when there were jobs it was a beautiful place. Let’s get jobs going, it’s gonna help your kind of people and my kind of people.”

It’s an interesting look at  the Republican state of mind, particularly those who are excited to vote for Trump. They are very upset about the loss of their way of life.  I explored that issue in this piece for Salon a while back: The America they want to “take back” doesn’t exist anymore.

.

The latest addition to Trump’s “Bigots and Bullies endorsement list”

The latest addition to Trump’s “Bigots and Bullies endorsement list”

by digby

I wrote about Trump’s latest endorsement for Salon today:

I mentioned yesterday that Trump had secured the endorsements of the most notorious bullies, racists and xenophobes in the country. Going into Super Tuesday, he doesn’t need super-delegates, he’s got the Super-bigots: Senator Jeff Sessions, Former Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, Former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke, Maine governor Paul LePage, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, nativist and anti-Semite Pat Buchanan and now Kris Kobach, the anti-immigrant activist and Kansas Secretary of State.
I wrote about Kobach a while back, noting his history as former Attorney General John Ashcroft’s special adviser on immigration, who had proposed a federal law that would have required local police to stop and arrest people “suspected” of being undocumented immigrants. It went nowhere in the Bush administration, but it served as the template for what became the Arizona’s infamous SB 1070 and similar proposals that were very hot around the nation until the courts struck them down.
Kobach would later turn his attention to vote suppression and helped push many of the Voter ID laws now in force around the states. He ran for his current office in the Tea Party wave of of 2010 on a “voter integrity” platform and managed to enact some of the most draconian voter ID laws in the country based upon the notion that hordes of undocumented immigrants were preparing to steal elections in Kansas on behalf of the Democratic Party.  So it comes as no surprise that he would be among the bullies and bigots endorsing Donald Trump.
His endorsement was really something. In a laudatory statement on official Kansas Secretary of State letterhead, Kobach wrote: 
For me the most important issue in the Republican presidential contest is immigration and its effect on our nationals security. On that issue Mt. Trump stands head and shoulders above the other candidates. He has made it clear that ramping up the enforcement of our immigration laws will be his top priority. And he had forcefully rejected the notion of giving amnesty to illegal aliens living in the United States.
Now, more than ever, America needs Mr. Trump’s aggressive approach to the problem of illegal immigration. Our porous borders constitute a huge national security threat, and our refugee system has been abused by terrorists in the past and is likely to be abused by ISIS terrorists today.
You’ll notice he even still uses the loaded term “illegal aliens.”
He also explained that he’s spoken with Trump about a legal justification to force Mexico to pay for that wall of his:
As I have discussed with Mr. Trump, the PATRIOT Act contains a provision that the United States can and should use as leverage with the Government of Mexico. We have the ability to shut down the flow of remittances to Mexico from illegal aliens working in the United States. Mexico will then have to make a choice: either make a single payment of $5-10 billion to the United States to pay for the wall, or lose most of the $23 billion in remittances that Mexico receives every year from its nationals working illegally in the United States.
That sounds like a thuggish Trump gambit alright. It’s hard to see how the PATRIOT Act could be construed to allow the government to  blackmail another country to pay for a vanity project, but you never know. It’s certainly easy enough to believe Trump would try it.
In a telephone interview with the Kansas City Star , Kobach had nothing but praise for the frontrunner. He said his lack of experience was positive because “the way he would operate as president is he would surround himself with a talented, conservative team.That’s exactly what Reagan did.” Reagan, of course, had been the governor of the most populous state in the country and had the entire GOP establishment behind him when he took office. But no matter. Selling ties and steaks with your name on them, bankrupting four companies and doing a reality TV show is all the experience anyone needs to lead the most powerful nation on earth.
To give credit where credit is due, Kobach did have an original defense of Trump’s crude, juvenile insults:
“Trump is actually doing it himself, and in some ways that’s more honest than having a super PAC do your insulting for you,” Kobach said.
At least he’s honest about something.
Today Republicans are going to the polls in 11 states to make their choice for the presidential nomination. And citizens of five of them  — Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia — will have to deal with the kind of voter ID laws passed by Kris Kobach and others like him in recent years ostensibly to keep African Americans and Latinos from stealing elections for the Democrats, but actually to make voting as difficult as possible so they just won’t bother to vote at all. It’s designed for general elections, but today is primary day and Republicans had better hope their onerous rules don’t keep their own voters from the polls.
If you are curious about the voting requirements in your state, this handy web-site from the National Conference of State Legislatures can help.  If you’re a Republican and you find that trying to vote for Donald Trump is more complicated than filling out your federal income tax return, don’t blame “big government.” Blame his biggest fan, Kris Kobach, and the other GOP architects of the vote suppression schemes around the country.

Have we crossed a tipping point in the Arctic? by @Gaius_Publius

Have we crossed a tipping point in the Arctic?

by Gaius Publius

Dr. Michael Mann giving us the latest news about Arctic sea ice (source)

We’ve covered what’s happening in the Arctic before. For example:

Now comes climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann to tell us it’s much worse, and the changes are coming much faster, than we thought even last year. As Hartmann says in his introduction, temperatures in the Arctic in January were 4°C (more than 7°F) higher than average. It’s all in Dr. Mann’s interview with Thom Hartmann (above).

A few excerpts:

(1:52) “Even I find myself surprised sometimes at the rate at which some of these changes are taking place — taking place faster than we expected, faster than our models predicted would be the case…”

(2:40) “[This year, winter Arctic sea ice] appears to have come to a peak about a month earlier and at a much lower level than we normally see at [winter] peak. And if it continues on this trajectory, we are afraid we will see levels of [sea ice] retreat this summer unlike anything we’ve seen before.”

(4:10) “With all that warmth in the Arctic escaping into the atmosphere, it changes the pattern of the northern hemisphere jet stream … [which gives us] some of the unusual weather we’ve seen in recent winters….”

(5:17) “This El Niño has been a very unusual El Niño, and all bets are off….” (I found this discussion fascinating. This is a most unusual El Niño, and global warming has almost completely removed the “heavy rainfall” effect that places like California were counting on to relieve their drought.)

(7:58) The tipping points discussion starts here. Have we passed a tipping point about ice in the Arctic? What other tipping points should we be concerned about?

Dr. Mann’s answer begins, “Tipping points are like land mines. You don’t know exactly where they lie, and you certainly don’t want to step on one. What we’re doing with climate change right now is we are risking stepping on more and more of these land mines.”

Mann talks about the tipping point we have passed in the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet that commits us to 10-12 feet of sea level rise.

The good news — if we stop emissions, free ice in the Arctic is restorable, unlike ice in the Greenland or Antarctic ice sheets. (Of course, we do have to stop emissions to do that.)

(10:35) “The climate change deniers often like to complain about how much it will cost to reduce our carbon emissions … and the sad fact is it’s going to cost us a whole lot more simply not having acted on this problem soon enough. And we’re already seeing the costs…”

To the final question, why doesn’t this get covered more in the press, the answer was enlightening. In part, Mann said that is seems this is a slowly evolving problem.

Me: It’s not slowly evolving. If you live another 10 years, you’ll see the start of the panic. For reference, here’s what’s been happening to Arctic sea ice extent (as opposed to volume) year after year. The blue band shows the upper and lower range of a set of IPCC model predictions (here are many models). The red line is observations. Note that the chart shows data through 2009 only. 2012 was even worse, dipping to 3.6 million km2.

(Click to enlarge.)

By the way, the Arctic is heating because the northern hemisphere is where all the, well, hot air is. Take a look at this NASA animation and note which hemisphere has all the industrialization. You can almost watch it rise and then move north.

Time for a mobilization to actually address this? I think it’s long past time.

(A version of this piece appeared at Down With Tyranny. GP article archive here.)

GP
 

.

A certain moral flexibility by @BloggersRUs

A certain moral flexibility
by Tom Sullivan

Nick Naylor (lobbyist for the Academy of Tobacco Studies): My job requires a certain… moral flexibility.

Thank You for Smoking (2005)

Martin Blank (contract killer): When I left, I joined the Army, and when I took the service exam, my psych profile fit a certain… “moral flexibility” would be the best way to describe it. I was loaned out to a CIA-sponsored program – it’s called “mechanical operations” – and we sort of found each other.

Grosse Pointe Blank (1997)

Perhaps it is a class thing. We already know the rich live by a different set of rules from the hoi polloi. One fascinating thing about moralizing by many conservatives is their flexibility about accepting people (among their tribe) who bend the rules and get away with it. If an opponent does it, that’s wrong. If they do it – say, waterboarding or carpet bombing – well, you can’t make an omelet, etc., etc. Beating the system or rigging the game in one’s favor is a sign of strength. Cleverness and guile are the marks of a leader.

So the latest from BuzzFeed Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith should have no impact whatsoever on Donald Trump:

The New York Times is sitting on an audio recording that some of its staff believes could deal a serious blow to Donald Trump, who, in an off-the-record meeting with the newspaper, called into question whether he would stand by his own immigration views.

Smith suggests a bombshell in the unreleased tapes from the off-the-record part of the interview:

On Saturday, columnist Gail Collins, one of the attendees at the meeting (which also included editor-in-chief Dean Baquet), floated a bit of speculation in her column:

The most optimistic analysis of Trump as a presidential candidate is that he just doesn’t believe in positions, except the ones you adopt for strategic purposes when you’re making a deal. So you obviously can’t explain how you’re going to deport 11 million undocumented immigrants, because it’s going to be the first bid in some future monster negotiation session.

Trump’s fans (he calls them that) want Trump the celebrity deal-maker. Someone skilled in the art of manipulation. They don’t care if they are the ones being manipulated. The fact that Trump can put one over on them is proof that he should be a ruler, and that they deserve to be subjects. It is entertaining to be fooled. But not by David Blaine in a tee shirt. By someone flashier, more Las Vegas, more Siegfried and Roy.

Asked about the tape and whether building a border wall is negotiable, Trump told Sean Hannity, “By the way, it is negotiable. Things are negotiable. I’ll be honest with you, I’ll make it two feet shorter or something. I mean everything’s negotiable.”

Bill Clinton got impeached for dissembling over the meaning of is and sex. What Trump pomises to get elected? Negotiable. Clinton didn’t know how to negotiate.

The fact that Trump is an ostentatious showman, that he’s a fake and a manipulator just makes democracy political entertainment, and isn’t that what we want? The fact that he himself can be duped into retweeting real quotes from Mussolini and fake ones from Gandhi just adds to the show.

I have to admit that when I wrote about the professional wrestling entertainment flavor of Trump’s run for president, I did not realize he had actually participated in WrestleMania:

It’s all fake. Sports entertainment. Are you not entertained?

And it’s Super Tuesday. Trump doesn’t need to buy votes, but I’m surprised he isn’t selling tickets.