Skip to content

Month: May 2016

Character is destiny by @BloggersRUs

Character is destiny
by Tom Sullivan

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. – Constitution of the United States, Article II, Section 1

Jon Stewart wonders what I’ve been wondering: Did the Founders err in merely specifying chronological age as a prerequisite for the presidency and overlook psychological age? We’re speaking of Donald Trump, of course. From Raw Story:

“Are you eligible to run if you’re a man-baby, or a baby-man?” Stewart asked David Axelrod during a live taping of Axelrod’s podcast in Chicago. “I don’t know if they’re referred to as man-baby Americans. He is a man-baby. He has the physical countenance of a man and a baby’s temperament and hands.”

Stewart recalled the argument that ensued online when the Republican presidential candidate revealed his full name on Twitter, prompting the show to begin calling him “F*ckface von Clownstick.”

“I don’t know that a man-baby can be president,” Stewart explained. “Character is destiny. And he is the most thin-skinned individual.”

Character is destiny. What you see is what you get.

He’ll throw something together in time for the inauguration #donworryaboudit

He’ll throw something together in time for the inauguration

by digby

… don’t worry your pretty little heads about it:

Politico has a story today about all the Republicans who are refusing to ever work in a Trump administration.  Not that it matters to him:

A source familiar with Trump’s thinking explained that the billionaire businessman was reluctant to add new layers of policy experts now, feeling it would only muddy his populist message that has been hyperfocused on illegal immigration, trade and fighting Islamic extremists.

“He doesn’t want to waste time on policy and thinks it would make him less effective on the stump,” the Trump source said. “It won’t be until after he is elected but before he’s inaugurated that he will figure out exactly what he is going to do and who he is going to try to hire.”

How much could there be to do? After all, he’s put together a bunch of deals to put his name on steaks and ties and he’s gone through several business bankruptcies. Running the most powerful nation on earth is nothing to that kind of experience. He’ll just go in, issue some orders and it will be done.

Policy is a waste of time when you’re running for president for sure. No need to understand it. Besides, who has time? He’s got to keep up on twitter and instagram and read the National Enquirer and watch “the shows.” And he’s got to all in regularly on top of doing a rally. The man isn’t a machine fergawdsakes.

I heard he’s putting Chris Christie in charge of heading up his transition and scrubbing down his shower stall so that’s good.

.

QOTD: A prominent Republican

QOTD: A prominent Republican

by digby

John McCain’s alter ego Mark Salter:

“He’s going to lose, and I think he’s got kind of an unstable personality to begin with. I think he could come apart, you know, in some kind of visible way. I think that’s quite possible. … I’m not a psychiatrist, but there is something wrong with [the] guy.”

He says he’ll vote for Clinton over Trump but holds out some hope for a third party candidate.

.

The enemy of your enemy can still be your enemy

The enemy of your enemy can still be your enemy

by digby



Billionaire Sheldon Adelson said last week that he was going to vote for Trump.  He had a personal chat with him and was convinced that Trump is good for Israel so he’s fine with him.  Trump made a big speech at AIPAC that went over very well with the crowd. (AIPAC issued an apology but only for Trump’s rudeness toward the president.)

I wonder if the Jewish conservatives who think Trump’s nomination is good for their cause have thought this through:

Julia Ioffe has filed a report with the D.C. police department over the anti-Semitic threats that she received — many from apparent Trump supporters — after writing a penetrating profile of Melania Trump in GQ.

The alleged offense is listed as “threat to kidnap or injure a person,” as outlined under the Code of the District of Columbia 22-1810. Said threats came through phone calls and email, notes the report. And the “public narrative” section reads as follows: “C-1 states that an unknown person sent her a caricature of a person being shot in the back of the head by another, among other harassing calls and disturbing emails depicting violent scenarios.”

Melania Trump responded to the story (which as really quite benign) with an angry Facebook post almost certainly dictated by her husband and this happened:

Hate site the Daily Stormer responded with a story titled, “Empress Melania Attacked by Filthy Russian Kike Julia Ioffe in GQ!” The attacks against Ioffe then started flowing over social media, email and phone. The Erik Wemple Blog cited some examples of the vileness in this post. Several of the blasts came from people who showed signs that they supported Trump. “The Trumps have a record of kind of whistling their followers into action,” the 33-year-old Ioffe told the Erik Wemple Blog. A quarter-century ago, Ioffe and her family fled anti-Semitism in Russia and moved to the United States. She has worked at the New Republic and written for the New York Times Magazine; she recently joined Politico Magazine as a contributing writer.

In an interview last week with Wolf Blitzer of CNN, Trump said, “I haven’t read the article, but I heard it was a very inaccurate article, and I heard it was a nasty article,” said Trump, showing off his intellectual independence. Speaking of Melania Trump, the candidate said, “She doesn’t need to have bad things said about her.” Pressed on the anti-Semitic threats, Trump said he didn’t know anything about the situation. “You’ll have to talk to them about it,” he told Blitzer, before ripping the press for being “dishonest.”

Donald Trump has a harder time disowning white supremacists than he does the Repubican political establishment. These are his people. And he seems to know it.

I’m sure I don’t have to tell Sheldon Adelson and the members of AIPAC that just because Trump hates Muslims and Mexicans it naturally follows that he loves Jews. The White Supremacists who love Trump put them all in the same basket of hate. And Trump doesn’t seem to mind.

Update: Former KKK leader Tom Metzger recently gave an interview about Trump. Most of it was silly trolling but this seemed right:

Do you believe Donald Trump is flirting with white supremacists to get their vote?I think the white supremacist vote is very small. There is little for him there. But I do think that there is a third or a quarter of this country who are closeted racists. When I talk to the blacks they agree with me. Too many white people are ashamed to say they’re proud to be white or that they want to marry white. So, this is a chance for them to come out and flex their muscles.

.

Bully pulpit

Bully pulpit

by digby

You will congratulate me young man and you will do it with enthusiasm each time we meet:

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on Monday morning bristled when questioned about his attacks on former President Bill Clinton’s past infidelity.

CNN host Chris Cuomo jumped into an interview by asking Trump about his comments labeling Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton as an “enabler” of her husband.

Cuomo pointed to a panel of independent voters, saying, “Most of them don’t like it. They see it as a distraction, they see it as hypocritical coming from you, and mostly they see it as potential proof that you may have no real ideas to offer as president. What is your thinking on this line of attack?”

“Well this is a nice way to start off the interview,” Trump responded in the phone interview. “First of all, you should congratulate me for having won the race. I thought there at least would be a small congratulations. But I’m not surprised with CNN.”

Cuomo pushed back, saying he had congratulated Trump, but the businessman responded, “We haven’t spoken. Last week, toward the end, I was essentially the nominee of the party and you start off with this question, which is not surprising because I understand CNN perhaps better than you do.”

Trump went on to deny that his opening attack in the general election campaign targeted Bill Clinton’s infidelity, pointing to his remarks on trade, the military and illegal immigration.

Trump took a swipe at Clinton at a rally Friday night. He then ramped up the attacks by going after his impeachment Saturday night and knocking Hillary Clinton as an “enabler.”

Later in the CNN interview on Monday, Trump called the initial question “totally inappropriate.”

“I spoke very little about that compared to other things. You took a small amount of the speech and you build it up like it’s the biggest thing in the world,” Trump said.

“But it is a big thing. Look, he was the worst abuser of women,” Trump continued.

“You just said I’m making too much of it, now you say it’s a big thing,” Cuomo interjected.

“Excuse me — as a politician, in the history of our country,” Trump finished.

“He was impeached, and then he lied about it,” Trump continued. “The guy was impeached for lying.”

They’ve nominated a 12 year old boy for president.

.

Wrong within normal parameters

Wrong within normal parameters

by digby

He’s a wingnut but he’s not insane:

PJ O’Rourke: Well, Peter, I have a little announcement to make. Yeah, I have a little announcement to make.

I mean, my whole purpose in life basically is to offend everyone who listens to NPR, OK? No matter what position they take on anything, like, I’m on the other side of it, you know.

I’m votin’ for Hillary.

I am endorsing Hillary. And all her lies and all her empty promises. I am endorsing Hillary. The second worst thing that could happen to this country. But she’s way behind in second place, you know? She’s wrong about absolutely everything — but she’s wrong within normal parameters!

Peter Sagal: That is a ringing endorsement! …

O’Rourke: I mean, this man just can’t be president of the US. I mean, they got this button, it’s in a briefcase, he’s gonna find it.

He can’t be the only one who sees this.

.

The crack-up is real this time

The crack-up is real this time


by digby

I wrote about the conservative crack-up for Salon this morning:

Ever since M. Emmett Tyrrell wrote “The Coming Conservative Crack-up” in The American Spectator back in 1987  (he wrote a book with the same title five years later) the idea that the modern conservative movement that was incubated in the pages of the National Review and John Birch Society pamphlets and hatched in the embers of the epic flame-out of the Goldwater campaign was in crisis has been in circulation.

Tyrrell had written an earlier book cleverly called “The Liberal Crack-up” in which he concluded that the left had achieved all it could have reasonably achieve by the 1970s and had turned to dilletantish radicalism obsessed with silly cultural irrelevancies like feminism. But he was no less concerned for his own tribe which he saw in the tumult of the Iran-Contra scandal as being dangerously parochial and self-serving, unable to “insulate their President against dissolving into sentimental appeasement against his Iranian foes.”  That was nearly thirty years ago and someone’s been crying wolf about this impending crack-up on a regular basis ever since then (often preceded by a fund-raising ask to fend it off.)  This time it’s for real.

If you doubt that, all you have to do is watch any cable news network since the realization hit that Donald Trump is going to be the 2016 nominee to see that the party is completely disoriented  with some people taking strong positions for and against while others are clearly weighing whether their own careers are better served one way or the other. Newspaper pundits are analyzing what went wrong and trying to provide guidance for conservatives who have devoted themselves to the cause for decades as they watch their party burst into flames while others analyze the potential upside to a Trump victory for the cause. Comedians and cartoonists are having a field day.

Weirdly, Tyrrell’s analysis of the crack-up from way back when seems to have been premature rather than outright wrong which lends credence to the notion that this has been happening in slow motion for quite a while. He saw a movement that was in love with its own voice and thought it had all the answers:

Throughout the Reagan years the conservatives have been off pursuing their one way to save  the Republic; The Seminar! The Commemorative Banquet! Fund raisers! The narrowness of America’s conservatives is a mystery.I have seen it retard fuddy-duddies like Russell Kirk and the libertarians, who can become violent at the first departure from orthodoxy. But it also overcomes conservatism’s new recruits the noconservative who gave up on Liberalism when its utopianism became intolerable Th neoconservatives too adopt on way to save the world: The Quarterly Journal! The News Letter! Anti-Communism! Economic Growth!

The result is a conservatism composed of conservatives who do not integrate their narrow values into the broad range of human experience. Their views are sound enough but each is only one recipe on life’s menu. Coq au vin is delicious and good for you but man cannot live by squiffed chicken alone. Too often conservatives have insisted that only their favorite dish leads to good health. In this they are as bizarre as vegetarians and as unwholesome.

It’s fair to say that the average Trump voter likely has as much disdain for coq au vin as he does for Vegan lasagna. His favorite dishes weren’t ever on the printed menu — they were the “politically incorrect” specials the politicians offered with delightful sounding descriptions to disguise their more prosaic elements (like “Salisbury steak”)  — or what we routinely think of as dogwhistles that only the unreconstructed racists and xenophobes can hear. Trump came along and made it the specialty of the house and folks are lining up around the block for it.

Watching the final crack-up is one of he most fascinating political events of the past 40 years and we’ve had some fascinating political events during that period from epic scandals to presidential disgrace to impeachment and stolen elections.  And it’s true that the liberal coalition came apart at the beginning of the period with the schism over civil rights, the anti-war movement and tumultuous social change. However, say what you will about George McGovern but he was a war hero and mainstream politician not an unqualified, demagogic TV celebrity. And in the dark period of the post-Watergate 70s, which was just as cynical about politics as today, their turn to an “outsider” was a straight-laced Governor from Georgia.

Now we have the spectacle of the last two Republican presidents, George HW Bush and George W, along with along with the last Republican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, refusing to vote for the 2016 nominee. The 2008 candidate once known for his independence and integrity is in a tough Senate race and is playing so many angles he’s not making any more sense than his old running mate Sarah Palin. The smarmy Republican majority leader of the Senate whispers that he thinks he can manipulate the amateur Trump to his will so he isn’t too worried. And the Speaker of the House, the once and future Republican king Paul Ryan is hedging his bets unwilling to say if he will support the nominee even though he is the chairman of the convention that will nominate the man. He is between the proverbial rock and a hard place with the GOP base now intractably hostile to him over his inability to single-handedly pass their agenda while at the same time needing to preserve some semblance of credibility to lead the party once the fall’s epic debacle is done.

Former VP nominee Sarah Palin may be a word-salad spinning crackpot but she spoke for many members of the GOP in her appearance yesterday with Jake Tapper on CNN. She compared Ryan to Eric Cantor, the former House majority leader who was unexpectedly ousted in a 2014 primary by a far right anti-immigration zealot, and pledged for Ryan’s Trumpish primary challenger Paul Nehlen, saying:

Paul Ryan and his ilk, their problem is they have become so disconnected from the people they were elected to represent. Their problem is they feel so threatened at this point that their power, their prestige, their purse will be adversely affected by this change that is coming with Trump.

It seems unlikely that Nehlen can win a primary against a sitting Speaker but they said the same thing about Eric Cantor.

Oddly, Ryan’s current unpopularity is one unifying aspect of the conservative movement which also finds itself splitting into warring factions between the Trumpies and the Cruzers. Ryan, you see, is stuck in the past with a conservative vision that has gone completely out of fashion. He says he wants to take the GOP back to the ideals of Jack Kemp, former congressman, VP candidate and Ryan’s mentor. To get a flavor of what that is, this op-ed by Kemp from 2004 spells it out:

A struggle is under way for the soul of the Republican Party between a minority of protectionist xenophobes and those who are pro-trade and pro-immigration. It’s beneath the radar screen, but it’s not so quiet. 

I was enormously gratified last week to see voters send a powerful message to Nervous Nellies in the party who remain reluctant to stand on their principles in an election year. In two critical primaries, one for the Senate seat in South Carolina and one for the House seat in Utah, Republican voters rejected reactionary candidates and awarded politicians who took courageous positions on immigration, trade and Social Security reform.

The victory for Kemp’s version of compassionate conservatism was short-lived.The House seat in Utah to which he refers was held by Chris Cannon until 2010 when he was defeated in a primary by right wing Tea Partyer Jason Chaffetz. Jim DeMint boldly declared that Obamacare would be the president’s “Waterloo” and then decamped to the Heritage Foundation, to which Donald Trump is outsourcing his Supreme Court vetting process.

Kemp wrote:

The votes in recent primaries should be a shot across the bow not only of these reactionary Republicans but also of John Kerry and other Democrats buying into the notion that CEOs of companies with overseas operations are somehow unpatriotic. These votes clarify that the voters realize the blame for jobs going overseas should not be directed at foreign people or countries but at bad policies and the elected officials who enact them, burdening American businesses and making American operations uncompetitive in a global economy. 

The results of the DeMint and Cannon elections highlight how wrong conventional wisdom usually is. These elections should also remind those running for office this fall that voters will often reward politicians who have the courage of their convictions so long as their convictions appeal to voters’ best hopes and confidence rather than their worst fears and doubts.

That’s Paul Ryan’s philosophy. He might as well call himself a Whig for how relevant that is today.

Meanwhile, old hands like Limbaugh are struggling mightily to bring the Cruzers back to the fold with daily incoherent ramblings while Cruz supporter and  OG movement leader Richard Viguerie now says that if Trump chooses a movement conservative as his VP all will be forgiven. He’s also using an interesting rhetorical feint to pretend that Trump and his followers are actually doctrinaire movement conservatives as well, just by tacking on the word “populist” and railing against the Washington elites:

“Right now conservatives are mostly on the sidelines waiting to see if Trump will govern as a conservative,” said Mr. Viguerie. “And conservatives will remain Doubting Thomas until they see the hard evidence of Trump’s personnel choices – his VP candidate, Supreme Court nominee, White House team and whether or not he remakes the RNC with conservatives.” 

“Only a conservative – populist coalition that unites all three legs of the old Reagan coalition – national security conservatives, economic conservatives and cultural conservatives – with the 21st century political movements of the Tea Party and limited government constitutional conservatives can generate enough votes to defeat Hillary Clinton and a Democratic Party now completely taken over by the far-left.”

It’s unclear who that’s supposed to fool, but you’ll notice he forgot to include actual populists on that list. The three legs of the Reagan coalition, the Tea Party and the “limited government constitutional conservatives” are all the same people who’ve been members of the conservative movement for decades. Now it’s true that many of them are probably xenophobes and religious bigots which makes some of them support Trump but his unique form of right wing populism would definitely be an extra appendage on that stool. There’s nothing in the doctrinaire movement playbook that includes blowing up America’s global alliances, putting huge tariffs on imports or banning Muslim immigration.

Viguerie can be forgiven for whatever he says because he’s never made any secret of the fact that he profits most when the Republicans lose elections. One might expect that many conservative movement professionals are actually looking forward to a Trump loss which they believe will reinvigorate their cause and bring in an influx of money and activists who want to cleanse the party of Trumpism and bring on the conservative rapture once and for all. It remains to be seen if the smoking wreck of the GOP can sustain life well enough for another run at it.

Meanwhile, right wing media is as divided as the party itself with anti-Trump voices like Mark Levin giving no ground. Newt Gingrich, who is often mentioned as a possible VP is all over TV and social media singing Trump’s praises clearly trolling for some kind of position on the inside. Limbaugh continues to speak in tongues trying to straddle the various conservative fault lines without falling into one and having the earth close up around him. Mostly he’s just trying to find ways to say “Keep Calm and Carry On” in as many different ways as possible.

Emmett Tyrrell was right that conservative movement orthodoxy was already stale by the late 1980s. It took a carnival showman like Newt Gingrich to put some lipstick on it back in the 1990s and liven it up for a decade or so and then Big Money and Osama bin laden kept it breathing past its natural expiration date. But in 2016, with the demise of 17 presidential candidacies representing every element of the Republican Party and the conservative movement as we’ve known it for the past 40 years and voters choosing an unreconstructed know-nothing bigot, it’s well and truly dead. The only question now is whether it will come back in zombie form or if Trumpism or something else will replace it. Right now there’s just no way of knowing how it’s going to come out.

The way the politicians and movement actors are reacting to that fact is telling us something new about who they really are. Perhaps that’s the one thing for which we can thank Donald Trump.

Who’s that sitting beside you? by @BloggersRUs

Who’s that sitting beside you?
by Tom Sullivan


Bank of America Stadium, Charlotte, NC.
Photo by HangingCurve via Wikimedia Commons.

Today is the deadline the U.S. Department of Justice has given the state of North Carolina to cease and desist in enforcing its HB2 transgender discrimination law. Reports suggest the state will defy the order.

State Rep. Paul Stam, one of the bill’s sponsors, told NPR this morning he hoped that the governor would stand firm against the federal government enforcing an “Obama-type” bathroom policy. Seriously.

After a Twitter debate with N.C. House Majority Leader Mike Hager about North Carolina’s HB2 transgender discrimination bill and whether the NBA All-Star Game would take place in Charlotte, former TV talk show host Montel Williams last week sent Hager a cake festooned with “#lovewins” and “#repealHB2” written in icing. Williams, a conservative who campaigned for Republican candidate John Kasich, opposes the law.

I was already thinking about illustrating the absurdity of HB2 with a sports analogy. But not with the game itself. My April 17 post on “intersex” babies noted that children are born with ambiguous genitalia at the rate of about 1 in 1,500 to 1 in 2,000. And that is only one of several forms of sex/gender variation. I cited intersex in talking about transgender discrimination because there is no questioning whether this is all in people’s heads. This is not what is derisively called “a lifestyle choice.” (When did you decide your were intersex?) It is a documented medical fact. Transgender is different and less understood, but several studies suggest that 0.3 percent of adults identify as transgender.

Here’s where the sports part comes in. At a capacity football game where the stadium holds roughly 80,000 fans — the Carolina Panthers’ Bank of America Stadium holds 75,412 — then statistically, about 40 or more fans were born intersex (using 1 in 2,000). Where does the government propose these ambiguous-at-birth, paying customers flush their used beer and soda? How about Clemson’s Death Valley, South Carolina? You proposed a bill similar to HB2. Death Valley seats 81,500.

Again, statistically, another 240 paying customers standing in lines to use the Carolina Panthers’ restrooms during the game identify as transgender. Which one is that fan sitting beside you supposed to use, Gov. Pat McCrory? Men’s or Women’s? Can we put you on speed-dial to sort it out?

Sunday funnies

Sunday funnies

by digby

Not actually all that funny …

But this was nice, I thought, although ironic since the Republicans have nominated Trump for president …