Skip to content

Month: June 2016

The end of the Christian Right?

The end of the Christian Right?

by digby

I wouldn’t be so sure. But this guy seems to think so:

I attended the very first meeting of the Moral Majority held in Indianapolis in February of 1980. I was the Washington state director of the MM and have been a leader of the “Christian right” ever since.

Today an estimated 1,000 evangelical leaders are making a pilgrimage to Trump Tower to “listen” to Donald Trump.

The organizer of this meeting came to my office to tell me in person why I wasn’t being invited. I had been too vocal in my anti-Trump views.

I appreciated his courtesy in coming to me and he agreed that the obvious implication of the meeting was to rally support for Trump.

While I don’t question the motives of those who are trekking to the Tower, I strongly dissent from the wisdom of their chosen path.

This meeting marks the end of the Christian Right.

The premise of the meeting in 1980 was that only candidates that reflected a biblical worldview and good character would gain our support.

Today, a candidate whose worldview is greed and whose god is his appetites (Philippians 3) is being tacitly endorsed by this throng.

They are saying we are Republicans no matter what the candidate believes and no matter how vile and unrepentant his character.

They are not a phalanx of God’s prophets confronting a wicked leader, this is a parade of elephants.

In 1980 I believed that Christians could dramatically influence politics. Today, we see politics fully influencing a thousand Christian leaders.

This is a day of mourning.

Here’s what came out of that meeting:

They seem to be happy to work with him. Even Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention who has been a harsh critic.

Let’s hear no more from these people about “morals and values” ok? Or even the Bible. Or the weather.

Update: Right Wing Watch has the dossier on all these fine folks.

.

From the man who says he’s never had to ask God for forgiveness

From the man who says he’s never had to ask God for forgiveness

by digby

Just as he has called President Obama’s religious faith into question, the degenerate pig at the top of the GOP ticket is now calling Hillary Clinton’s into question as well:

Donald Trump questioned Hillary Clinton’s commitment to her Christian faith on Tuesday, saying that little is known about her spiritual life even though she’s been in the public eye for decades. 

Speaking to a group of top social conservative evangelical Christian leaders at a gathering in New York City, Trump said, “we don’t know anything about Hillary in terms of religion.” 

“Now, she’s been in the public eye for years and years, and yet there’s no — there’s nothing out there,” Trump said. “There’s like nothing out there. It’s going to be an extension of Obama but it’s going to be worse, because with Obama you had your guard up. With Hillary you don’t, and it’s going to be worse.”

He’s such a moron. Clinton is famously Methodist and she’s always been very open about it. Anyone who’s followed politics over the past 25 years is very aware of her religious affiliation. Bill is the Baptist, she’s the Methodist.

But I’m curious about what Trump is suggesting here. We know he believes Obama is a secret Muslim. When he says “you had your guard up” that was in reference to the fact that he’s black and that his middle name is “Hussein.” But what does he suspect Clinton is hiding? Wicca?

Anyway, it’s total nonsense.  Here’s a nice story about Clinton’s religious mentor:

In the spring of 1962, Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most controversial men in America. One night in Chicago’s Orchestra Hall after delivering a stirring speech on civil rights and the future of America, he shook hands with a standout 15-year-old with conservative parents, Hillary Rodham.

More than 50 years later, the moment still resonates profoundly with Clinton, who has had an illustrious political career and could again seek to make history as the first woman president.

“Probably my great privilege as a young woman was going to hear Dr. Martin Luther King speak,” Clinton said earlier this year at an event at the University of Miami. “I sat on the edge of my seat as this preacher challenged us to participate in the cause of justice, not to slumber while the world changed around us. And that made such an impression on me.”

Clinton has traced much of her life in politics and activism to King’s words that night. But there was another minister, not famous like King, who also influenced her views on social justice and stoked an intensity for action.

Don Jones was the Methodist youth pastor who organized the trip of like-minded teens to see King, and mentored her for the rest of his life.

“Don opened up a new world to me,” Clinton said in 2009, the year he died, “and helped guide me on a spiritual, social and political journey of over 40 years.”

Jones became the youth minister at First Methodist Church in Park Ridge in 1961.
Jones became the youth minister at First Methodist Church in Park Ridge in 1961.

Park Ridge, Illinois, was a conservative Chicago suburb in the 1960s, made up of hard-working, middle and upper class families. It wasn’t diverse in politics or race.

“We lived in a suburb that was all white basically and everybody in Park Ridge was a Republican,” said Ernest Ricketts, a childhood friend of Clinton’s who attended elementary, middle and high school with her.

Clinton’s parents, especially her father, seemed to fit the town. Hugh was a small business owner and a vocal supporter of Barry Goldwater in 1965, while Dorothy, Clinton’s mother, was a closeted Democrat.

The former first lady attended First United Methodist Church with many of the same friends that she attended school with, and her life and experiences, from school to sports to church, revolved around Park Ridge.

That wasn’t the case for Don Jones, a Depression-era child who spent most of his youth in South Dakota and later attended South Dakota State. Before graduating, Jones enlisted in the Navy and served in Korea during the war.

A young veteran by the late 50s, Jones finished his degree at Augustana College and later enrolled in divinity school at Drew University in Madison, New Jersey, in 1958.

Peter Jones, Don’s youngest son, described his father as “naturally outgoing” and “inquisitive.” His oldest son, David, said his father had friends across the country and was fiercely loyal.

Politically, Don Jones also was inspired by a larger-than-life public figure. His sons said President Franklin Roosevelt “had an effect on his outlook on politics and what government can and can’t do for people.”

Upon graduating from Drew in 1961, Jones landed in Park Ridge at First Methodist, a conservative church that didn’t quite match his worldliness. For many, including Clinton, Jones was dramatically different than anyone they had ever met.

Jones started University of Life when he came to Park Ridge, a youth group for a few dozen high schoolers that met two times a week – Sundays and Thursdays. But meetings were not just bible readings and prayer. Jones, according to the young Methodists who attend the group with Clinton, was determined to broaden their outlook on life.

In an interview with Donnie Radcliffe for the 1992 book “A First Lady for Our Time,” Jones said he hoped the Park Ridge kids would “become aware of life outside Park Ridge.”

At one meeting, Jones arranged for an avowed atheist to debate a Christian on the existence of God. At another, Jones brought the group to a local synagogue and held a public discussion with a rabbi about Judaism and Israel. He held discussions about teenage pregnancy, drugs and crime and introduced his congregation to new authors and artists.

Jones also took his students to Chicago’s rough South Side and introduced them to the lives that other kids their age live – one of drugs, gangs and death. During the height of the civil rights movement, this kind of trip for kids like Hillary Rodham were unheard of.

“He came a very important time in our lives,” said Betsy Ebeling, a longtime Clinton friend who attended Jones’ youth group. In short, she described Jones as “very influential.”

Ricketts went further, telling CNN that Jones wasn’t only influential, he was life altering.

“He was very influential in giving us a different perspective, a different world view,” he said. “It wasn’t revolutionary, but he challenged us to look at things in a different way and a broader perspective.”

From the moment Jones arrived in Park Ridge, he was on thin ice, according to a number of people close to him. He was not a “fundamentalist” or “literalist,” said Peter Jones and that rubbed some in the community the wrong way.

“It was a conservative community and church,” his son said, “And he was a free thinker.”

“He wasn’t a religious figure that tried to indoctrinate or tell people what to think or feel or believe,” said David Jones. “He used a method that really drew people out and questioned them.”

So just two years after he moved to Park Ridge, Jones left. And although it is not totally clear, Ricketts and others said his unorthodox style may have been the reason.

“The things that Don did didn’t exactly endear him to the people who were the movers in shakers in Park Ridge,” said Ricketts, who vividly remembers when Jones left the community. “They were rather more conservative and weren’t entirely sure that they wanted the kids exposed to so many different ideas.”

Jones returned to Drew in 1966, a place he where he remained for the next four decades.
To Clinton, the mark the Jones left was already deeply cemented. The two stayed friends, regularly exchanging letters until Jones died in April 2009 at 78.

According to Radcliffe’s book, Clinton wrote him in 1964 and told him that she wasn’t getting along with the new youth minister.

“I think he believes I’m a little radical,” she wrote.

The letters continued when Clinton arrived at Wellesley College. In April 1966, she wrote Jones to talk about her new identities at college and in later that year she wrote him to talk about her changing view on politics.

“I wonder if it’s possible to be a mental conservative and a heart liberal,” she wrote.

Ricketts, who has kept up with Clinton since their years in Park Ridge, said Jones continued to mentor the budding politician long into her career.

“She has a very close relationship with him,” he said, noting that Jones attended both of Bill Clinton’s inaugurations and would visit Washington during the presidency. “He held her in very, very high regard,” said David Jones.

When Jones died, the university remembered him as “a beloved professor” and icon in the small New Jersey town. Clinton honored him as “a lifelong friend and mentor.”

“Don taught me the meaning of the words ‘faith in action’ and the importance of social justice and human rights,” she said in a letter. “I will miss him and will be grateful forever for the gift of his intelligence, counsel, kindness and support over many years.”

Although the former first lady, senator and secretary of state has mentioned more prominent figures as inspirations — like former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt and activists Malala Yousafzai — the faith leadership that Jones provided appeared especially enduring.

At a 2007 faith forum put on by CNN when Clinton was running for president, she mentioned her “old friend” and youth minister in a question about prayer.

“I was raised to pray,” Clinton said. “As a little girl, you know, saying my prayers at night, saying grace at meals, praying in church.”

Jones’ impact on Clinton came up again in at another CNN faith forum in 2008 when Clinton’s description of her faith foundation tracked very close to what Jones taught her in the 1960s.

“I have tried to take my beliefs, my faith, and put it to work my entire life,” she said. “And it has been gratifying to do the little I’ve done to try to help other people, which is really what motivates me.”
To people close to Clinton, including old friends from Chicago, Jones’ impact on the Democratic frontrunner remains clear as she contemplates another presidential run.

Faith continues to be an important part of Clinton’s life, according to Burns Strider, Clinton’s friend and faith adviser. Clinton carries a bible in her purse, Strider said, and will occasionally argue biblical texts while traveling.

“I think she lives based on how her faith and her experience within her faith, be it the youth trips into the city, the service trips, and different things, has informed her,” he said.
And to Ricketts, Jones’ impact was unmistakable.

“Hillary is the sum of all of these experiences and all of these philosophical expressions in her youth,” he said. “She has absorbed all of the experiences that she has had and benefited from the really positive influence of Don.”

But yeah, she’s never mentioned her religious faith. The Donald is so well-informed.

.

They’d do it all over again

They’d do it all over again

by digby

Huffington Post reports:

Plenty of Republican and Republican-leaning voters are less than thrilled with their presumptive nominee. While 44 percent consider him the best option out of this year’s pool of candidates, an equal 44 percent say he wasn’t the best choice, according to the survey, which was taken June 7-9.

Look at all those ex Governors, current Governors and Senators. And after everything people know, Trump still wins.

That says a lot about the Republican party. And it says a lot about Republican voters. All that “talent” and they don’t particularly like any of them.

.

He’ll kill them all with his tiny bare hands

He’ll kill them all with his tiny bare hands

by digby

According to Jerry Falwell Jr, the terrorists are going to run and hide when Trump becomes president because he’s so darned manly!

Via Right Wing watch:

Today, Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr. hailed Donald Trump as a “bold and fearless leader” ready to fight America’s enemies and bad trade partners. 

Falwell, speaking at the Religious Right meeting with the presumptive GOP nominee, said that just as Ronald Reagan freed the hostages in Iran upon taking office (he didn’t), Trump will similarly scare terrorism out of existence: “In my opinion, the day after Trump becomes president, every terrorist in the world will crawl under a rock in similar fashion.”

Sure they will.

Trump runs his campaign like he runs his casinos #andthatsnotgood

Trump runs his campaign like he runs his casinos

by digby

I wrote about Trump’s alleged business acumen for Salon today:

Yesterday’s bombshell that Trump had finally fired his incompetent campaign manager Corey Lewandowski hit the news networks like a lightning bolt. It had been clear for months the man was in over his head but Trump was loyal to him apparently under the assumption that he’d ushered him through the primaries and therefore knew what he was doing. According to news reports it took the Trump heirs gathering Lewandowski and The Donald in a room together to confront the campaign manager with the campaign’s lack of organization.

Trump apparently didn’t have a clue about any of it, and quickly dispatched his loyal servant when he was informed, which suggests that his only reading these days is old clippings of his once promising poll numbers. (Either that or he signed off on Lewandowski’s plans and pretended otherwise in front of the offspring which is more likely.) Whatever the case, he’s decided to make a change, presumably to put his dark despot wrangler Paul Manafort fully in charge.

And that’s not the even the biggest Trump news. Last night it was revealed that the Trump campaign only has $1.3 million on hand. That is less than many incumbent congressional campaigns. This comports with other reporting revealing that Trump is having a lot of trouble wooing donors raising the ultimate question as to why he doesn’t simply write himself a check. He claims to be worth $10 billion dollars. If that were true he could finance this campaign entirely with a small dent in his fortune. For “some reason” he won’t do that, insisting that the campaign can be run on the cheap.


None of this should be surprising. Trump has a long history of financial malfeasance. We’ve heard all about Trump University and ACN and various other low-rent branding schemes. But if the horror of Orlando had not intervened, the most significant part of his business history is probably all we would have been talking about over the past week. The morning of the massacre, the New York Times published an exposé of Trump’s 25 years of running gambling enterprises in Atlantic City and it was devastating. For obvious reasons most people did not pay attention to it in the wake of such an unspeakable tragedy. But it’s time to take a closer look.

The article was entitled “How Donald Trump Bankrupted His Atlantic City Casinos, but Still Earned Millions.” Let’s just say Trump always managed to take care of himself first. Everybody else got burned — “bigly.”

His audacious personality and opulent properties brought attention — and countless players — to Atlantic City as it sought to overtake Las Vegas as the country’s gambling capital. But a close examination of regulatory reviews, court records and security filings by The New York Times leaves little doubt that Mr. Trump’s casino business was a protracted failure. Though he now says his casinos were overtaken by the same tidal wave that eventually slammed this seaside city’s gambling industry, in reality he was failing in Atlantic City long before Atlantic City itself was failing.

But even as his companies did poorly, Mr. Trump did well. He put up little of his own money, shifted personal debts to the casinos and collected millions of dollars in salary, bonuses and other payments. The burden of his failures fell on investors and others who had bet on his business acumen.

It was a set-up:

“He assembled his casino empire by borrowing money at such high interest rates — after telling regulators he would not — that the businesses had almost no chance to succeed.”

It happened repeatedly. He would buy at the top, and then mortgage the property to the hilt hyping himself to investors as a supreme business genius, the bottom would fall out and the whole thing collapses for lack of funds. But being the consummate hustler he is, he persuades the investors to take huge losses then loan him money all over again for yet another venture with the same phony prospectus. He, of course, was taking tons of money from the enterprise the whole time for himself. He is estimated to have cost his investors more than 1.5 billion dollars in losses.

He did that four times in Atlantic City, four bankruptcies, until he finally ran out the string in 2010.

Despite his protestations that he “got out” before Atlantic City crashed, the truth is that he was in long after everyone knew it was failing, licensing his name to his derelict casinos and dirty hotels, making them buy his silly Trump swag at inflated prices and generally stiffing thousands of workers and contractors over and over again even was he was making millions. It’s fair to say that the allegedly sophisticated Wall Street investors should have known better than to believe the Trump hype, especially more than once, but unfortunately their foolishness took down a lot of smaller investors with them, people who put their retirement savings on the line and lost it all.

This investigative report came on the heels of an earlier expose in USA Today with the headline “Hundreds allege Donald Trump doesn’t pay his bills” about the more than 3500 lawsuits filed against him.. Basically, the scam was that he would contract with a company for some kind of work on the hotels, approve the work and then refuse to pay the final invoices telling them to take him to court if they didn’t like it, in some cases “advising” them to take the offer of a lower fee if they wanted any more work in the future. The legal fees would eat them alive and they would often drop the case or be ruined. And those weren’t even the scores of businesses and employees who were destroyed by his serial bankruptcies.

This is how he operates his businesses so it shouldn’t be too surprising that he’s running the same scams on his campaign. His May FEC reports show that 20% of the nearly 7 million spent in May went to Trump-owned businesses or family members. The campaign pays for his sons and daughter to travel for appearances. It “rented” Trump’s Palm beach club Mar-a-Lago and paid for Trump’s private 767 757. According to Market Watch, “the filing suggests that Trump himself is drawing a salary from the campaign, which would be highly unusual.” That would be unusual for a normal candidate, it’s standard operating procedure for Trump. Whether these expenses are commonly charged to campaigns is irrelevant. There is no law against a candidate paying his own expenses out of his own pocket. Trump is choosing not to do that for some reason.

He has loaned his campaign about 45 million dollars, which he insists is only a loan on paper and has no intention of paying back to himself from campaign funds. He’s using some of those funds to “pay expenses” apparently which, for him, is actually quite generous. But if I were a contractor or a vendor doing business with the Trump campaign, I’d insist on payment in full before delivery. There is very little chance you’ll ever see your money otherwise. Trump gets his take before everyone anyone else. There’s rarely anything left when he’s done.

.

Seth Meyers makes Donald Trump an offer he shouldn’t refuse, by @Gaius_Publius

Seth Meyers makes Donald Trump an offer he shouldn’t refuse

by Gaius Publius

This video is great fun. Plus, it hits the nail where nails need hitting.

“You’d still get to be president, but without any of the hassle of being president…” (or words to that effect). Because we all want to know what a President Trump would be like; we just don’t want the consequences. Meyers has a plan.

Watch. You won’t regret it.

GP

.

You were expecting, what? by @BloggersRUs

You were expecting, what?
by Tom Sullivan

From the Guardian:

The US Senate failed to advance new restrictions aimed at curtailing gun violence on Monday, as lawmakers voted down four separate measures just one week after a terrorist attack in Orlando marked the deadliest mass shooting in the nation’s history.

Democrats and Republicans had put forth competing amendments to both strengthen background checks and prevent suspected terrorists from purchasing firearms. But all four bills fell short of the 60 votes needed to clear a procedural hurdle in the Senate, in a near replica of a vote held in December when a pair of shooters killed 14 people and wounded 22 more in San Bernardino, California.

The scene is all too familiar for the families of past mass shooting victims From the New York Times:

With every mass shooting in America, a somber scene replays itself here. Victims’ families and survivors of massacres — Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Tucson, Sandy Hook, Charleston, San Bernardino — traipse up to Capitol Hill. They knock on lawmakers’ doors, attend news conferences and bear witness to Senate votes on gun measures that almost never pass.

So there was a sense of déjà vu here on Monday as the Senate rejected four gun safety measures, one week after the Pulse nightclub massacre, which killed 49 and injured 53, in Orlando, Fla.

“This is like a very, very, very bad Groundhog Day movie,” Lori Haas, Virginia state director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, told the Post from Orlando. Her daughter was injured in the Virginia Tech shooting.

The specifics of the proposed bills almost don’t matter, do they? Until mass shootings start happening at Capitol Hill bars where legislators unwind after their long days of frenzied inaction, the aftermath of every new mass shooting will look like Groundhog Day. Except in the movie, the only one who kept dying was Phil — by suicide.

Groundhog Day was a redemption story. Tomorrow didn’t come until Phil regained his humanity and a sense of community. It won’t come for us either until we as a country do. How many
Groundhog Days will we have to relive until finally we get it right?

QOTD: Justice Sotomayor

QOTD: Justice Sotomayor

by digby

This was from a dissent in the 5-3 decision today allowing evidence gleaned from otherwise illegal police searches into court if the defendant was discovered to have an outstanding warrant (including a parking ticket!) Justice Breyer joined the wingnuts.

Justice Sotomayor issued a blistering dissent. Here’s Mark Joseph Stern at Slate:

Sotomayor, who dominated oral arguments in Strieff, refused to let the majority get away with this Fourth Amendment diminution without a fight. In a stunning dissent, Sotomayor explains the startling breadth of the court’s decision. “This case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants—even if you are doing nothing wrong,” Sotomayor writes, in a dissent joined in part by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “If the officer discovers a warrant for a fine you forgot to pay, courts will now excuse his illegal stop and will admit into evidence anything he happens to find by searching you after arresting you on the warrant.”

“Most striking about the Court’s opinion,” Sotomayor notes “is its insistence that the event here was ‘isolated,’ with ‘no indication that this unlawful stop was part of any systemic or recurrent police misconduct.’ ” But in truth, “nothing about this case is isolated.” Sotomayor then dives into the widespread police misconduct that has dominated headlines for several years, focusing on the Department of Justice’s Ferguson report to demonstrate that “outstanding warrants are surprisingly common.”

The Department of Justice, Sotomayor writes, “recently reported that in the town of Ferguson, Missouri, with a population of 21,000, 16,000 people had outstanding warrants against them.” That means 76 percent of Ferguson residents have, under the court’s decision, effectively surrendered their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizure. “In the St. Louis metropolitan area,” moreover, “officers ‘routinely’ stop people—on the street, at bus stops, or even in court—for no reason other than ‘an officer’s desire to check whether the subject had a municipal arrest warrant pending.’ ”

Then she really lets fly:

“writing only for myself, and drawing on my professional experiences, I would add that unlawful ‘stops’ have severe consequences much greater than the inconvenience suggested by the name.” (Sotomayor cites previous opinions, citations that I’ve excised for clarity.)

This Court has given officers an array of instruments to probe and examine you. When we condone officers’ use of these devices without adequate cause, we give them reason to target pedestrians in an arbitrary manner. We also risk treating members of our communities as second-class citizens. Although many Americans have been stopped for speeding or jaywalking, few may realize how degrading a stop can be when the officer is looking for more.

The indignity of the stop is not limited to an officer telling you that you look like a criminal. … If the officer thinks you might be dangerous, he may then “frisk” you for weapons. This involves more than just a pat down. As onlookers pass by, the officer may “feel with sensitive fingers every portion of [your] body. A thorough search [may] be made of [your] arms and armpits, waistline and back, the groin and area about the testicles, and entire surface of the legs down to the feet.”

The officer’s control over you does not end with the stop. If the officer chooses, he may handcuff you and take you to jail for doing nothing more than speeding, jaywalking, or “driving [your] pickup truck . . . with [your] 3-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter . . . without [your] seatbelt fastened.” At the jail, he can fingerprint you, swab DNA from the inside of your mouth, and force you to “shower with a delousing agent” while you “lift [your] tongue, hold out [your] arms, turn around, and lift [your] genitals.” Even if you are innocent, you will now join the 65 million Americans with an arrest record and experience the “civil death” of discrimination by employers, landlords, and whoever else conducts a background check. And, of course, if you fail to pay bail or appear for court, a judge will issue a warrant to render you “arrestable on sight” in the future.

“It is no secret that people of color are disproportionate victims of this type of scrutiny,” Sotomayor continues, citing Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow and Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between the World and Me:

For generations, black and brown parents have given their children “the talk”— instructing them never to run down the street; always keep your hands where they can be seen; do not even think of talking back to a stranger—all out of fear of how an officer with a gun will react to them.

Finally, Sotomayor builds to her jaw-dropping peroration:

By legitimizing the conduct that produces this double consciousness, this case tells everyone, white and black, guilty and innocent, that an officer can verify your legal status at any time. It says that your body is subject to invasion while courts excuse the violation of your rights. It implies that you are not a citizen of a democracy but the subject of a carceral state, just waiting to be cataloged. We must not pretend that the countless people who are routinely targeted by police are “isolated.” They are the canaries in the coal mine whose deaths, civil and literal, warn us that no one can breathe in this atmosphere. They are the ones who recognize that unlawful police stops corrode all our civil liberties and threaten all our lives. Until their voices matter too, our justice system will continue to be anything but.

I’m going to take a wild guess that like his pal Jeff Sessions, this proves Sotomayor is unable to be “fair” because of her Puerto Rican heritage. That’s how people like him think. Which is why we need more people like Sotomayor on the court.

.

Poor Paulie and all his great big wonderful plans

Poor Paulie and all his great big wonderful plans

by digby

This piece by Brian Beutler about Ryan’s dilemma is a real work of insight.  Not only does he get at why Ryan is so stymied but also at the essential void at the center of his Big Strategy. An excerpt:

For a man as close to achieving what no conservative in the history of the movement has achieved, Ryan’s crass expediency isn’t nearly as baffling as it seems. His plan for igniting a conservative revolution has always been fairly straightforward: First, Republicans have to win control of government, and then they can ignite a conservative revolution.

The details of Ryan’s vision have always remained somewhat foggy. The conservative revolution Ryan has in mind isn’t a popular or cultural one; it is entirely legislative. And the predicate for enacting it isn’t to sell a set of ideas to the public, but to steel the spines of legislators to vote for Ryan’s ideas no matter what the public thinks.
Ryan’s revolutionary ideas themselves aren’t entirely clear, either, though that wasn’t always the case. Before he became the undisputed intellectual leader of the conservative movement in the Obama era, he laid out a series of specific and radical reforms–including Social Security and Medicare privatization–in a 2008 bill called the Roadmap for America’s Future. When it fell to him as chairman of the House budget committee to draft a governing agenda for the whole party, though, many of the details vanished.
Ryan still wants to devolve Medicare into a subsidized system of competition between insurance carriers, but only for seniors in the distant future. He still wants to hand Medicaid over to the states and slash its budgets by hundreds of billions of dollars. He still wants to cut income tax rates for the wealthy to about a third of their current level. He still wants to spend lavishly on the military. But when asked how to pay for it all, he’s exceedingly vague. He promises to cut tax expenditures, but doesn’t say how or which ones. He promises to slash the domestic discretionary budget (which disproportionately benefits the poor), but won’t say which programs, or by how much. 

All of that was to be decided after Republicans won the White House. That was Ryan’s game plan when he was budget chairman; it remained his game plan as the GOP’s vice presidential nominee in 2012. And the plan seemed to be well within reach when Republicans finally consolidated control of Congress in 2015, and a raft of talented candidates were lining up to fill the last piece of the puzzle: the presidency.
Donald Trump’s GOP presidential primary victory has almost surely blown up Ryan’s plans. Trump has the Republican Party poised not just to lose the White House, but to suffer a devastating down-ballot wipeout that could conceivably end the GOP’s congressional majority. And even if he weren’t a generationally bad candidate, Trump has shown little interest in Ryan’s fiscal agenda. “This is called the Republican Party, it’s not called the Conservative Party,” he reminded the conservative movement last month.
But Ryan has been unable to accept that reality has departed irrevocably from his expectations.

And that is why he finds himself lashed to the mast of the sinking ship Trump.

And evidently he still thinks this great plan might be possible. He’ll just present trump with the legislation and Trump will sign it like a good boy. Because that’s just the type of guy he is …

.

It’s not just the Mexicans and the Muslims …

It’s not just the Mexicans and the Muslims …

by digby

Via Mother Jones:

A well-educated black has a tremendous advantage over a well-educated white in terms of the job market. And, I think, sometimes a black may think that they don’t really have the advantage or this or that but in actuality today, currently, it’s, uh, it’s a, it’s a great. I’ve said on occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today I would love to be a well-educated black because I really believe they do have an actual advantage today.

This is the Trump voter’s most fundamental belief about America today. And when Trump says he’s going to make America great again, they hear him saying that he’s going to reverse this terrible injustice. That’s what the anti-PC anger is all about.

But make no mistake. He loves “his” African Americans. In fact, it’s worth noting that most Americans in 1989 didn’t use the phrase “a well-educated black” instead of “well-educated black person.”  He was already way out of date.  So I suppose he’s evolved.  But keep in mind that when he said that he was 43, old enough to know better that’s for sure.

.