Skip to content

Month: October 2016

‘What are you a girl???”

‘What are you a girl???”
by digby

I didn’t think it could get any stupider but by God, it has. Via C&L:

Fox News host Tucker Carlson asserted on Sunday that “science” was on the side of a doctor claiming male Hillary Clinton supporters suffered from low testosterone.

“A doctor [is] under fire for claiming men who support Hillary Clinton likely suffer from low testosterone,” Carlson teased before a commercial break. “It’s science. You can’t deny it.” 

“Are you a Low T denier?” he quipped. 

Following the break, Carlson explained that Fort Myers Dr. Dareld Morris was offering a free testosterone test to men who support the Democratic nominee. 

“The question is, can you argue with science?” Carlson said.

Business genius

Business genius

by digby

Seriously, people. This business genius lost money in the biggest economic expansion of our lifetime:

This morning Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s top adviser, said Trump is a great man, compared him to Steve Jobs and Winston Churchill and called him a business genius.

My God …

.

Trump’s something for nothing by @BloggersRUs

Trump’s something for nothing
by Tom Sullivan

Donald Trump knows the U.S. tax code so well he could probably resolve the national debt by finding a clever way to write it off.

The New York Times’ Susanne Craig last month received an envelope in the mail containing pages from Donald Trump’s 1995 federal tax return. (Craig has written in the past about Trump’s finances.) That year Trump claimed more than $900 million in losses. The envelope contains a return address purporting to have come from Trump Tower. It appears, says Think Progress, Trump has a mole:

That means Trump could have made over $50 million a year for nearly two decades and paid nothing in federal taxes. (The I.R.S. lets taxpayers apply loses for up to 18 years to offset future and past income.)

The losses stem from “a dizzying array of deduction, business expenses, real estate depreciation, losses from the sale of business assets and event operating lawsuits” that flow from various entities control by Trump to his “personal tax returns.”

Trump’s assets at the time were “hemorrhaging money,” according to the Times.

Trump is the first presidential candidate in decades to refuse to release his tax returns, claiming he cannot do it because he is under IRS audit while claiming in nearly the same breath during Monday’s debate, “I will release my tax returns against my lawyers wishes, when she [Clinton] releases her 33,000 deleted emails.”

The Times contacted Jack Mitnick, the retired attorney and accountant whose name appeared on the document as the tax preparer. Mitnick declared the document and his signature genuine. Experts the Times called in to examine the pages found no evidence of wrongdoing by Trump even though the $916 million in losses had to be eye-popping for the IRS:

“He has a vast benefit from his destruction” in the early 1990s, said one of the experts, Joel Rosenfeld, an assistant professor at New York University’s Schack Institute of Real Estate. Mr. Rosenfeld offered this description of what he would advise a client who came to him with a tax return like Mr. Trump’s: “Do you realize you can create $916 million in income without paying a nickel in taxes?”

Mr. Trump declined to comment on the documents. Instead, the campaign released a statement that neither challenged nor confirmed the $916 million loss.

“Mr. Trump is a highly-skilled businessman who has a fiduciary responsibility to his business, his family and his employees to pay no more tax than legally required,” the statement said. “That being said, Mr. Trump has paid hundreds of millions of dollars in property taxes, sales and excise taxes, real estate taxes, city taxes, state taxes, employee taxes and federal taxes.”

The statement continued, “Mr. Trump knows the tax code far better than anyone who has ever run for President and he is the only one that knows how to fix it.”

One presumes the Trump campaign did not intend fix in the definition 7 sense.

The Times observes that the pages it obtained revealed little about Trump’s charitable giving:

Because the documents sent to The Times did not include any pages from Mr. Trump’s 1995 federal tax return, it is impossible to determine how much he may have donated to charity that year. The state documents do show, though, that Mr. Trump declined the opportunity to contribute to the New Jersey Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial Fund, the New Jersey Wildlife Conservation Fund or the Children’s Trust Fund. He also declined to contribute $1 toward public financing of New Jersey’s elections for governor.

His rival for the presidency has been both more forthcoming and more charitable:

For Hillary and Bill Clinton, the total is $23.2 million between 2001 and 2015. That figure comes from the Clintons’ joint tax returns, which the Democratic nominee has released.

In that 15-year period — the years since the Clintons left the White House — they earned about $237 million in adjusted gross income, much of it from speaking fees and book royalties. So Clinton and her husband donated about 9.8 percent of their adjusted gross income.

Trump says he is worth far more than the Clintons. He recently claimed his net worth as more than $10 billion.

But it appears he has donated far less.

The Washington Post has identified about $3.9 million in donations since 2001 from Trump’s own pocket.

At ten percent, the Clintons’ charitable giving looks downright biblical. Contrary to the email from your wingnut uncle, the money the Clintons contributed did not go into their own pockets. Trump, however, seems to have used others’ donations to his private foundation to pay off his debts:

The Donald J. Trump Foundation has raised very little money over the years and appears to have done little in the way of charitable giving. That’s not the scandal, however. More troubling is the way in which Trump has funded his foundation and then used its resources. Thanks to the dogged reporting of David Fahrenthold of the Washington Post, we now know that Trump has apparently directed those who owe him money to donate to the foundation. He has then used money in the foundation to make political donations, buy a portrait of himself, and, even more disturbing, to settle personal and business disputes. That behavior evinces a shocking disregard for the law—one that makes Trump’s boasts about fighting to pay as little income tax as possible even more ominous than they initially sounded.

Tax returns Clinton released for 2015 show she paid taxes at a rate of 34 percent, and more than $43 million in federal taxes since 2007. By Trump’s rules, that either makes Hillary Clinton not as smart as he is or more patriotic. She isn’t trying her damndest to get America’s blessings for nothing.

Trump, of course, is threatening legal action against the Times for the release of the pages. It’s a thing the thin-skinned mogul has done before over a joke he doesn’t like.

Standard Operating Procedure: Wish you were here by Dennis Hartley

Saturday Night At The Movies


* Dennis is recovering from surgery so I’m re-running this older post that seems unfortunately relevant…
 
Standard Operating Procedure: Wish you were here


by Dennis Hartley

Auschwitz staff, 1944 (Holocaust Memorial Museum)


Abu Ghraib staff, 2004



There was a fascinating documentary that aired recently on the National Geographic Channel calledNazi Scrapbooks from Hell. It was the most harrowing depiction of the Holocaust I’ve seen, but it offered nary a glimpse of the oft-shown photographs of the atrocities themselves. Rather, it focused on photos from a recently discovered scrapbook that belonged to an SS officer assigned to Auschwitz. Essentially an organized, affably annotated gallery of the “after hours” lifestyle of a “workaday” concentration camp staff, it shows cheerful participants enjoying a little outdoor nosh, catching some sun, and even the odd sing-along, all in the shadow of the notorious death factory where they “worked”. If it weren’t for the Nazi uniforms, you might think it was just a bunch of guys from the office, hamming it up for the camera at a company picnic. As the filmmakers point out, it is the everyday “banality” of this evil that makes it so chilling. The most amazing fact is that these pictures were taken in the first place. What were they thinking?

This is the same rhetorical question posed by one of the interviewees in Standard Operating Procedure, a new documentary about the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal from renowned filmmaker Errol Morris. The gentleman is a military C.I.D. investigator who had the unenviable task of sifting through the thousands of damning photos taken by several of the perpetrators. Since this is primarily a movie review, I don’t feel a need to rehash the back story for you (especially when a Google search of “Abu Ghraib” yields over 3 million results). We’ve all viewed those thoroughly repulsive photos ad nauseam, and the cold hard facts of the case have been well-documented and endlessly dissected.

The next logical question might be, what was Erroll Morris thinking? What startling new insight could he offer on this well-worn subject? This guy is no slouch-he has been responsible for several of the most well-crafted and compelling American documentaries of the last 30 years, from his 1978 debut Gates of Heaven, (a knockout doc about pet cemeteries) to the true crime classic The Thin Blue Line (1988), and his most recent critical success The Fog of War (2003). Once again, Morris serves up a unique blend of disarmingly intimate confessions, delivered directly into a modified teleprompter by his interviewees, accented by the highly stylized recreations of certain events.

Perhaps in an attempt to avoid flogging a dead torture victim (in a manner of speaking) Morris makes an interesting choice here. He aims his spotlight not so much on analyzing the glaringly obvious inhumanity on display in those sickening photos, but rather on our perception of them. So just who are these people that took them? What was the actual intent behind the self-documentation? Can we conclusively pass judgment on the actions of the people involved, based solely on what we “think” these photographs show us? In a weird way, Morris’ insistence on drawing us “behind” the photo sessions made me flash on Antonioni’s 1966 classic Blow Up. The protagonist in that film is a fashion photographer who becomes obsessed with examining a series of seemingly benign pictures that he takes in a public park. He begins to believe that he has inadvertently documented a murder taking place in the background of the photos…or is he just seeing what he wants to see? The film challenges our perception of what we “see” as reality.

According to Abu Ghraib poster girl Lyddie England and several other of the convicted MPs who Morris interviews in the film, the “reality” behind the prisoner “abuse” was (in their perception ) “standard operating procedure”; they were merely “softening up” the subjects for the CIA interrogators. You know-just doing their job. One phrase you hear over and over is “everybody knew what was going on”, which sounds suspiciously like that old Nuremberg line “we were only following orders”. And so it goes.

Morris also plays up the bizarre “love triangle” aspect of the tale. When asked to explain her willingness to ham it up for the most infamous prisoner humiliation photos, England blames it on amore. “What can I say,” she shrugs, “I was in love.” She is referring to Charles Graner, her then lover/now estranged father of their lovechild, currently serving 10 years for his part in the scandal (Morris was denied permission by the military to interview him). As we now know, Graner was concurrently “dating” another MP, Megan Ambuhl, who has since become his wife (it’s all so…Jerry Springer). Here’s a sobering thought: Thanks to the methodical “softening up” of America’s prestige conducted by the Bush white house during its first four years, all it took was a taxpayer-funded white trash scrapbook from hell to drive the final nail into its coffin.

Morris has taken some flak for focusing only on those who some may consider the low-level “scapegoats” of the Abu Ghraib debacle; these critics seem to be implying that he is not targeting high enough in the food chain. There is some merit in this assertion; the only “brass” featured in the film is the palpably embittered ex-brigadier general and former Abu Ghraib overseer Janis Karpinski, who angrily asserts that she was treated to a dog and pony show whenever she visited the facilities. But in all fairness, Morris does not have the hindsight of history on his side in this case. We can’t expect anything close to that great final shot in All the President’s Men of the teletype keys pounding out the Nixon resignation bulletin. In a truly fair and balanced universe, the only satisfactory denouement to any story about the Iraq “war” should be a closing shot of a spinning newspaper, finally righting itself to declare “Bush and Cheney to be Impeached For War Crimes!” The Nixon administration is history. We’re still living this nightmare.



.

The sloppy Don

The sloppy Don

by digby

The next time one of Trump’s shameless surrogates smears Alicia Machado with an alleged relationship with Mexican drug lords (based on Drudge laundered lies in the Daily Mail) maybe someone should mention this from Slate last spring which is actually well-sourced:

[T]here is another figure from that era [the 1980s] whose connections to Trump have been covered less, but might be more troubling: Joseph Weichselbaum. A 1991 piece in Spy, a 1992 book by reporter Wayne Barrett, and a recent investigation by theSmoking Gun detailed the Weichselbaum-Trump relationship; here’s a summary. (I don’t have Barrett’s book—I’m working off this 1992 piece about it.)

In the mid-’80s, Spy/Barrett/the Smoking Gun say, Weichselbaum worked for a helicopter company that shuttled clients to and from Trump’s Atlantic City casinos. Spy and TSG say Weichselbaum had previously been convicted of grand theft auto and embezzlement. Spy says Weichselbaum was the general manager of the Trump-connected helicopter company from 1983 until 1986 and that his brother Frank Weichselbaum was one of the men who owned it.

In October 1985, Weichselbaum was charged with trafficking cocaine and marijuana through Florida to Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina. He wasindicted in Ohio and ultimately pleaded guilty to two felonies in the case. Spyand TSG say he cooperated with authorities in the case.

After Weichselbaum was indicted but before he went to prison, per Spy andTSG, he began renting an apartment in the Trump Plaza building in Manhattan. The Smoking Gun says that Trump owned the individual unit and rented it directly to Weichselbaum as a landlord.
Both Spy and the Smoking Gun say that while Weichselbaum’s trafficking case was pending the Trump Plaza unit was partly paid for in “barter”—i.e. in-kind services provided by Weichselbaum’s helicopter company. 

During this time, Weichselbaum applied for a change of venue in his cocaine case. The case was transferred from Ohio to Newark, New Jersey, where the new judge in his case was … 

Maryanne Trump Barry, Donald Trump’s sister! She then handed the case off to a different judge, to whom Trump wrote a letter asking for leniency for Weichselbaum before his November 1987 sentencing. (Spy, TSG, and Barrett’s book all report on the letter.) 


Weichselbaum was convicted of two felony charges and ultimately received a three-year sentence. He spent about 18 months in prison beginning in January 1988. After he was released, he moved into a different Trump property—Trump Tower—in an apartment that TSG and Spy say his girlfriend had purchased. Spysays Weichselbaum told his parole board he planned to work for Trump after his release. 

Spy, Barrett, and TSG say Trump continued to pay Weichselbaum’s erstwhile company—which per Spy went bankrupt and re-formed itself under a new name twice during the time Trump was paying it—for helicopter services after his indictment. Spy specifically says the payments continued until 1990. 

Trump launched his own New York–Atlantic City helicopter service in 1988.

Per the Smoking Gun, Weichselbaum is now 74 and living in Los Angeles and does not appear to have had further troubles with the law. (His son, however, at one point spent 46 months in prison an now, according to the Smoking Gun, runs a X-rated webcam business.)

In summary, multiple outlets have reported that Donald Trump vouched for and rented an apartment to Joseph Weichselbaum—a known felon and soon-to-be-convicted drug trafficker. For some still-unknown reason, Weichselbaum’s drug prosecution passed briefly through Trump’s sister’s courtroom in a state that had no apparent connection to the case. And Trump continued to pay Weichselbaum’s helicopter company after Weichselbaum was convicted and (according to Spy) after Trump had founded his own helicopter business.

A Trump campaign spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment about Trump’s relationship with Weichselbaum.

Now why would Trump, of all people, the man who stiff virtually everyone, continue to pay for the service he didn’t need that was owned by a convicted felon?

There are so many stories of Trump’s involvement with mobsters and people like this he really should be more careful about opening these cans of worms. He was in the gambling business fergawdsakes. Of course he’s connected. Why anyone in his position would think it’s a good idea to run for office is beyond me.

His trio of Fredos are no better:

.

.

He warned her he would hit her hard if she played the “woman card” months ago

He warned her he was going to hit her hard if she played the “woman card”

by digby

… she said “go ahead and try it, Donald.”

Trump’s good friend Roger Stone has been in his ear the entire campaign. He wrote a book called “Hillary Clinton’s War on Women” in anticipation of this moment. And the Clinton campaign knew it too.

Remember this?

CBS NEWS December 24, 2015, 6:44 AM

Trump warns Clinton about playing “the war on women” card

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump is taking aim at Hillary Clinton after the Democratic front-runner referred to the real estate mogul as “sexist.” Clinton was responding to a question about Trump’s use of a vulgar term [“schlonged”] to describe her 2008 primary loss to Barack Obama.

Trump issued a warning on Twitter, telling Clinton to “be careful as you play the war on women or women being degraded card.” He later tweeted, “I have great respect for women” and again warned her to “BE CAREFUL!”

Clinton and her team don’t seem too concerned about Trump’s warnings, reports CBS News correspondent Julianna Goldman. Unlike Trump’s Republican rivals who have struggled to confront him, Clinton is playing offense and urging their supporters to step up and express their displeasure with the real estate mogul’s choice of language.

“I don’t know that he has any boundaries at all,” Clinton said in an interview with the Des Moines Register Tuesday.

Clinton said Trump should be held accountable for his language.

“I think he has to answer for what he says … it’s not the first time he’s demonstrated a penchant for sexism. And so, I’m not sure, again, anybody’s surprised,” she said.

Trump fired back Wednesday night.

“I really haven’t gone after Hillary yet and there’s a lot to go after,” Trump said

And so did his political director, Michael Glassner.

“I think it’s ironic that Hillary Clinton is playing the sexism card considering the record of her husband and his term in the White House. He was impeached by the House of Representatives for his behavior,” Glassner said on CNN.

Earlier this week, Clinton’s staff urged supporters to use the campaign’s hashtag #imwithher to combat Trump’s “degrading language.”

They’re also capitalizing on one of Trump’s few polling weaknesses.

A recent survey shows 61 percent of women nationally have an unfavorable opinion of Trump, including nearly 30 percent of Republican women.

I wrote about it at the time for Salon. The Republicans chose the most outrageous misogynist they could find to run against the first woman candidate and he laid out his he-man rules months ago.

His battle with Megyn Kelly was a warning:

This whole thing ostensibly blew up because Trump does not like Fox News’ brightest star Megyn Kelly and wanted her removed as one of the moderators of the debate. It was made abundantly clear that if Fox kept Kelly on the panel there would be consequences:

In a call on Saturday with a FOX News executive, [Trump campaign manager Corey] Lewandowski stated that Megyn had a ‘rough couple of days after that last debate’ and he ‘would hate to have her go through that again.’

Trump himself had said something similar, ominously adding,“maybe I know too much about her.” This is patented Trump.

The professional consensus among the Republicans up until now was that this was a mistake because it would turn off women. I’m guessing they feel that ship has sailed. From reading Kellyanne Conway’s twitter feed and watching Sean Hannity,  it looks more like they think they can push Sanders voting millennials to vote third party giving Trump a plurality. It’s really their only hope.

This particular fight is central to Trump’s plan.  In fact,  it is Trump’s plan. He knew he was going to be running against a woman and in his juvenile, sexist brain, that’s all he needed.

It was always going to end this way.
.

A snapshot

A snapshot

by digby

So the polls show that Clinton holds on to a slim lead in the polls and it appears she’s bounced back a little bit after her bravura performance in the debate.

The New York Times Upshot:

Here’s a chart of the probability of Clinton vs Trump victory over the past few months from the New York Times Upshot:

538:

This is specifically where it’s changed in the last two weeks according to the New York Times:

It looks like Trump has nailed down Nebraska.

.

Rudy’s been spending too much time at Trump rallies

Rudy’s been spending too much time at Trump rallies

by digby

He’s forgotten that most Americans don’t like their racist rap:

The remarks Giuliani made to the Commercial Finance Association Thursday have not been publicly reported. But an attendee told the Observer the crowd was “shocked” by Giuliani’s comments and that some people began complaining about his speech almost immediately after it was over. 

“Rudy talked about immigration and made a really, really inappropriate comment about the quote-unquote Mexicans in the kitchen at the Waldorf,” the attendee said. “It was bad. You could hear a pin drop. I think he was looking for applause.” 

A second person in attendance also recalled a remark about Mexicans coming to the country to work illegally in kitchens. 

In his apology email, Trojan does not make any specific references to what Giuliani said—but he included an entire paragraph decrying discrimination in an effort to “underscore and clarify CFA’s beliefs and political approach.” 

“CFA abhors discrimination of any kind whether it is focused on race, age or gender. We are a nonpartisan organization with relationships spanning both sides of the aisle, which is vital to ensure that our positions are understood no matter which party is in office. These beliefs and approaches will never change,” the email reads. “You participated in our 40 Under 40 Awards because you support CFA’s effort to attract and retain the next generation of talent by illuminating and celebrating their achievements. You want to encourage young people, regardless of ethnicity, age, gender or religious belief to embrace our industry.” 

The attendee who related the kitchen remark said Giuliani seemed to be a poor choice to speak at the event for young financial professionals—the speech was not at all tailored to the audience, and focused on issues like immigration and terrorism rather than Giuliani’s leadership of New York City. 

“We got old school Rudy,” the attendee said, “and Trump, Trump, Trump.” 

Giuliani has courted controversy recently in his role as Trump’s attack dog. After Monday night’s debate between Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, Giuliani said that if he were the candidate, he wouldn’t agree to the next two debates unless the moderator backed off. The former mayor, who ended a marriage amid an affair and informed his then-wife of the split via a press conference, also said if he were debating, he would have brought up former President Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky. He went on to call Clinton “too stupid” to be president. 

And over the summer he was met with harsh criticism for his comments about Black Lives Matter protesters, calling the group “inherently racist.” Earlier, he took heat for saying President Barack Obama “doesn’t love America“—and that the president (who Trump for years insisted was not born in the United States) “wasn’t brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up.”

Trump and his pack of wild dogs are living in their own world. If he loses they’ll both be going back to New York. One hopes they will be shunned by their former peers when this is all over. It would be nice if the world makes it clear the “Trump brand” is permanently associated with white supremacy. There’s probably a market for that but it’s usually stuff people buy and keep in their basement.

If he wins, he’ll probably make a whole lot of money selling “President Trump” merchandise all over he world right out of the White House. Plenty of people will want to buy his favor.

.

No problemo, comrade by @BloggersRUs

No problemo, comrade
by Tom Sullivan

Donald Trump treats women as objects? No problemo. He lies by reflex? No problemo? He sleeps with a copy of The Tao of Putin beside his bed? No problemo, comrade.

The Daily Beast reports:

Suspicion is mounting about Donald Trump’s ties to Russian officials and business interests, as well as possible links between his campaign and the Russian hacking of U.S. political organizations. But GOP leaders have refused to support efforts by Democrats to investigate any possible Trump-Russia connections, which have been raised in news reports and closed-door intelligence briefings. And without their support, Democrats, as the minority in both chambers of Congress, cannot issue subpoenas to potential witnesses and have less leverage to probe Trump.

Privately, Republican congressional staff told The Daily Beast that Trump and his aides’ connections to Russian officials and businesses interests haven’t gone unnoticed and are concerning. And GOP lawmakers have reviewed Democrats’ written requests to the FBI that it investigate Trump before they were made public.

Not much seems to slow down the Trump train and the GOP is slow to apply any brakes. At the debate Monday night, there was this stunning admission in response Hillary Clinton questioning whether he pays his taxes:

CLINTON: Maybe he doesn’t want the American people, all of you watching tonight, to know that he’s paid nothing in federal taxes, because the only years that anybody’s ever seen were a couple of years when he had to turn them over to state authorities when he was trying to get a casino license, and they showed he didn’t pay any federal income tax.

TRUMP: That makes me smart.

James Fallows reports:

That makes me smart. Among the several hundred people watching the debate at the site where I saw it, there was an audible gasp at this line.

But likely it wasn’t a Trump audience anyway. Trumpsters probably nodded in agreement. They probably would not have cared that Trump used his charitable foundation (is “charitable” too charitable?) to which he’s contributed essentially nothing as a tax dodge and used foundation funds to settle his own debts.

Then there was the revelation this week in Newsweek that his company violated the Cuba embargo:

Documents show that the Trump company spent a minimum of $68,000 for its 1998 foray into Cuba at a time when the corporate expenditure of even a penny in the Caribbean country was prohibited without U.S. government approval. But the company did not spend the money directly. Instead, with Trump’s knowledge, executives funneled the cash for the Cuba trip through an American consulting firm called Seven Arrows Investment and Development Corp. Once the business consultants traveled to the island and incurred the expenses for the venture, Seven Arrows instructed senior officers with Trump’s company—then called Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts—how to make it appear legal by linking it after the fact to a charitable effort.

Besides this being illegal, Kurt Eichenwald reports, Trump later told Cuban-Americans in Miami (during his 1998 presidential bid) he would maintain the embargo and never spend company funds there until Fidel Castro was removed.

At Washington Monthly, Martin Longman notes wryly:

It’s quite a trick to simultaneously demonstrate pro-communist, pro-Russian disloyalty to the country and get the strongest possible endorsement from the Ku Klux Klan.

Oddly, it seems like the only thing that really hurts him is when he insults regular citizens, whether that’s a disabled reporter or the parents of a fallen solider or a former Miss Universe who he called “Miss Piggy.”

Since Monday, Donald Trump has been unsubtly and uncleverly “not bringing up” Bill Clinton’s sexual history since the first debate as a way of diverting attention from his own and hurting Hillary Clinton. And probably because he can’t help himself. “I can be nastier than she ever can be,” he told the New York Times.

The man who would be president couldn’t help himself from tweeting accusations about the former Miss Universe at 3 a.m. Friday morning. “Is that presidential?” asked Anderson Cooper. “What does presidential mean?” replied Trump surrogate Jeffrey Lord. Trump’s supporters don’t know either, and apparently they don’t care.