Skip to content

Month: January 2017

He’s off to a great start

He’s off to a great start

by digby


Check out the latest numbers from Gallup:


As Donald Trump prepares to take the presidential oath on Jan. 20, less than half of Americans are confident in his ability to handle an international crisis (46%), to use military force wisely (47%) or to prevent major scandals in his administration (44%). At least seven in 10 Americans were confident in Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton in these areas before they took office.

Americans express somewhat more confidence in Trump to work effectively with Congress (60%), to handle the economy effectively (59%), to defend U.S. interests abroad as president (55%), and to manage the executive branch effectively (53%). But even in these areas, Americans are far less confident in Trump than they were in his predecessors, when comparisons are available.

The results for Trump are based on a Dec. 7-11 Gallup poll. They are consistent with prior Gallup polling showing Trump having a much lower favorable ratingthan prior presidents-elect and a much lower approval rating for how he has handled his presidential transition.

The deficits for Trump versus the average for his predecessors range from a low of 15 percentage points on defending U.S. interests abroad to a high of 32 points for preventing major scandals.

Among the seven issues tested in the poll, Americans are most confident in Trump to work effectively with Congress (60%) and handle the economy (59%). Trump will have the benefit of working with Republican majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. However, Obama and Bush — both of whom also took office with a friendly Congress — engendered even greater confidence than Trump in this area.

Trump’s business background may contribute to Americans’ relatively positive expectations for his presidential performance on the economy. The economy was also a relative issue strength for Trump during the campaign.

Relatively few Democrats express confidence in Trump to handle the various presidential responsibilities, from a low of 14% for preventing scandals to a high of 35% for working effectively with Congress. Meanwhile, between 77% and 90% of Republicans are confident in the president-elect, expressing greater confidence in his ability to handle the economy and work with Congress, and less in his being able to prevent scandals.

The deficits in Trump’s ratings relative to his predecessors’ are largely because of the low scores he gets from supporters of the opposing party. On average, 21% of Democrats have confidence in Trump across the five presidential duties for which Americans also rated Bush and Obama (all except handling the economy and defending U.S. interests abroad). By contrast, for the same five areas, an average of 60% of Republicans were confident in Obama and an average of 57% of Democrats were confident in Bush. These data underscore the much more polarized partisan environment in which Trump will be taking office.

Trump also fares much worse among independents on the same five tasks (50%) than Obama (79%) and Bush (75%) did.

Confidence in Trump among his own party’s supporters (84%) is closer to that of Obama (94% among Democrats) and Bush (95% among Republicans), but still trails their levels by a significant margin.

Trump defied political experts as well as some historical election patterns in winning the presidency. Emerging the victor in a contentious campaign featuring two of the least well-liked candidates in modern presidential election history, Trump prepares to take office with a majority of Americans viewing him unfavorably. Trump is also much less well-liked than any recent president-elect.

As such, the public is much less confident in Trump than in his predecessors to handle several of a president’s major tasks, including dealing with challenging foreign policy matters such as handling an international crisis or using U.S. military force.

You might think the flip side is that he can only go up. But the truth is that he can still go lower. Some of those independents are giving him a shot but if he blows it, they’re out.

Great start to a new administration. And considering his New Year message, he couldn’t be happier:

.

Closing the Gap by @BloggersRUs

Closing the Gap
by Tom Sullivan


Deaths by terrorism, 2001-2014.

Progressive activists this year will be inclined to fight hard to preserve meaningful policies and programs both in the nation’s capitol and in states across the country. But that might not be the real fight.

During budget-balancing sessions as revenues fell during the Great Recession, legislators confronted gut-wrenching decisions. They were forced to make across-the-board cuts including to programs about which they cared deeply. To education, mental health programs, and more. People would be hurt. Legislators arrived home on weekends here looking as if they’d been physically beaten. (The stress of it, I believe, contributed to the early death of a beloved state senator.) I expect to see those looks again this year, just not because of budget shortfalls.

Heading into 2017, defending favorite programs may be the least of our worries. Defending democracy itself is the order of the day, E.J. Dionne cautions:

There should be no mistaking the dangers democracy confronts. The rise of far-right parties in Europe, the authoritarian behavior of governments in Turkey, Hungary and Poland, and the ebbing of center-left and center-right parties that were part of the postwar democratic consensus would be troubling even without the rise of Donald Trump. His emergence should sharpen our concern. “A right-wing demagogue in charge of the world’s most influential repository of democratic values,” wrote Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf, “is a devastating fact.”

The Washington Post Editorial Board concurs, seeing Trump’s arrival “as a challenge to a democratic system that has held the country together since the Civil War.”

Paul Krugman worries aloud in the New York Times that the United States risks becoming another corrupt “stan” like those of Central Asia:

Americans used to find the antics of these regimes, with their tinpot dictators, funny. But who’s laughing now?

We are, after all, about to hand over power to a man who has spent his whole adult life trying to build a cult of personality around himself; remember, his “charitable” foundation spent a lot of money buying a six-foot portrait of its founder. Meanwhile, one look at his Twitter account is enough to show that victory has done nothing to slake his thirst for ego gratification. So we can expect lots of self-aggrandizement once he’s in office. I don’t think it will go as far as gold-plated statues, but really, who knows?

Essentially, welcome to Trumpistan.

Krugman’s reference to Central Asia reminded me of Thomas P.M. Barnett’s “The Pentagon’s New Map” and his notion that the sources of conflict in the world are concentrated in the non-integrating “gap” areas under cultural stress and disconnected from the broader economy.

A post-election tweet from Barnett suggests he believes his analogy is applicable to a certain nation-state as well:

At this point we all face a bit of cultural and economic stress. I, for one, do not welcome the thought of the Gap growing to include this country any more than it has. The world has enough chaos. (A friend’s foreign cousin is recovering from gunshot wounds from the Istanbul attack.) Democracy itself is at risk, and repairing the breach right here may have a salutary effect not only at home, but abroad as well. It may be helpful to the seriousness of our purpose to remember that.

QOTD: Trump

QOTD: Trump

by digby

Fergawdsakes:

President-elect Donald J. Trump, expressing lingering skepticism about intelligence assessments of Russian interference in the election, said on Saturday evening that he knew “things that other people don’t know” about the hacking, and that the information would be revealed “on Tuesday or Wednesday.”

Speaking to a handful of reporters outside his Palm Beach, Fla., club, Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump cast his declarations of doubt as an effort to seek the truth.

“I just want them to be sure because it’s a pretty serious charge,” Mr. Trump said of the intelligence agencies. “If you look at the weapons of mass destruction, that was a disaster, and they were wrong,” he added, referring to intelligence cited by the George W. Bush administration to support its march to war in 2003. “So I want them to be sure,” the president-elect said. “I think it’s unfair if they don’t know.”

He added: “And I know a lot about hacking. And hacking is a very hard thing to prove. So it could be somebody else. And I also know things that other people don’t know, and so they cannot be sure of the situation.”

When asked what he knew that others did not, Mr. Trump demurred, saying only, “You’ll find out on Tuesday or Wednesday.”

Mr. Trump, who does not use email, also advised people to avoid computers when dealing with delicate material. “It’s very important, if you have something really important, write it out and have it delivered by courier, the old-fashioned way, because I’ll tell you what, no computer is safe,” Mr. Trump said.

“I don’t care what they say, no computer is safe,” he added. “I have a boy who’s 10 years old; he can do anything with a computer. You want something to really go without detection, write it out and have it sent by courier.”

Oh. My. God.

.

Dispatch from the Big Blue State hellhole

Dispatch from the Big Blue State hellhole

by digby

Weed’s actually been legal here for a few weeks. And it’s been quasi-legal for years. Thank God. We’re going to need it.

Here’s a nice list of all the new laws in California taking effect today. Since Real American Trump voters (and plenty of others) believe California’s only function in this country is to shut up and send them our money it’s probably not relevant.

But FWIW, this is Blue America 2017:

Employers are prohibited from paying women less than male colleagues based on prior salary. Workers in “substantially similar” jobs but of different race or ethnicity will also need to be paid equal wages.

Employers won’t be allowed to ask a job applicant to disclose information about an arrest, detention or court case — if it happened while the person was younger than 18.

Children younger than 2 must sit in rear-facing car seats.

Those convicted of driving under the influence must install a device in their cars that would ensure they are sober before they can start the ignition.

The state’s ban on texting while driving expands to include other distractions, such as searching for “Pokemon Go” characters.

Once a gray area for motorcyclists, new rules will be established by the California Highway Patrol for how fast they can drive when riding between cars along the lane line.

Companies including Uber and Lyft can no longer hire drivers who are registered sex offenders, have been convicted of violent felonies or have had a DUI conviction within the last seven years.

Drivers for companies like Uber and Lyft can’t have a blood alcohol content of 0.04% or more.

Charter bus drivers must provide written or video instructions to passengers on how to use the vehicle’s safety equipment and emergency exits.

School districts must improve bus driver training to avoid students being left alone on buses and must notify the Department of Motor Vehicles if students are left behind.

There will be new protections against foreclosure for surviving spouses who own their home but are not listed on the mortgage.

A program providing electric-car rebates will now only be available to those making $150,000 a year or less.

To help the state’s housing crisis, it will be easier for California homeowners to construct additional small units on their properties, whether in their garages or as freestanding second structures.

The cost for lead-acid batteries like those used to start cars and trucks will increase to help pay for cleaning up contaminated sites like the former Exide battery plant in Los Angeles County. Consumers will see the new $1 fee starting in April.

Inspired by the sexual assault allegations against comedian Bill Cosby, California eliminated statutes of limitations for rape and some other sex crimes. That means if a crime happens after Dec. 31, 2016, the victim can report it at any point in the future and see it prosecuted; previous law generally limited prosecution to within 10 years.

In response to outrage over the six-month sentence for sexual assault given to former Stanford student Brock Turner, prison time will be mandatory for those convicted of assault in which the victim was unconscious or not capable of giving consent because of intoxication.

County prosecutors can pursue felony charges against people caught with the most common date-rape drugs and who also have demonstrated the intent to commit a sexual assault.

Convicted sex offenders involved in Internet-related crimes must report their email addresses, user names and other Internet identifiers to police.

It will be tougher for law enforcement to seize someone’s cash, cars or property. A criminal conviction is now required before the police can permanently take from a suspect any assets valued under $40,000.

A ban is imposed on publishing the addresses of domestic violence victims

A ban is in place on possession of a synthetic drug called “spice.” The first offense would be an infraction; the second or third offense would be a misdemeanor.

Children can no longer be charged with prostitution, given the high incidence of human trafficking of people younger than 18. Adults who perform or solicit prostitution would not face mandatory minimum sentences.

It is now a crime to use ransomware, malware or intrusive software injected into a computer or network to hold data hostage until money is paid.

Public schools can now expel students for bullying through video or sexting. State education officials will be required to publish information on sexual cyberbullying online and encourage schools to teach students about sexting.

People will no longer be able to buy semi-automatic rifles that have a bullet button allowing removal of the ammunition magazine, commonly used in mass shootings. Those that have such weapons will have to register them with the state.

People who falsely report a firearm is lost or stolen would face a misdemeanor charge, and would face a 10-year ban on owning a firearm upon conviction.

Licenses to carry a concealed weapon will no longer vary from county to county. State justice department officials will create a uniform license.

Law enforcement officers and concealed-weapon permit holders who leave firearms in cars are now required to lock them in a safe box or in the trunk.

Bathrooms in public buildings with a single toilet must be designated as all-gender, open to anyone. The law will take effect March 1.

The state can’t fund or require public employees to travel to states believed to discriminate against lesbians, gays, bisexual or transgender people.

Smoking or use of electronic cigarettes within 250 feet of any Little League baseball game or other youth sports event is now illegal.

Beauty salons and barbershops can now offer patrons a free beer or glass of wine.

Denim is now the state’s official fabric to recognize its role in California history. (Levis)

Every autographed collectible sold in California must come with a certificate that verifies it’s not a forgery, under a bill backed by famed “Star Wars” actor Mark Hamill.

Patients who go to their insurance’s in-network hospital, lab or other health facility will not face surprise, larger charges if the doctor or health worker treating them is not in the network.

California businesses and public agencies are authorized to have on hand medicine designed to combat severe, emergency allergic reactions.

Women can pick up an entire year’s worth of birth control pills at once, and health plans must cover the cost.

To counter a spike in opioid overdose deaths, prescribers must check a state database to see whether their patients also have received drugs from other physicians.

Terminally ill Californians will have the “right to try” experimental drugs that do not yet have full federal approval for clinical trials.

Want to save an animal trapped in a car in heat or cold? As long as you call authorities first, you won’t be held legally liable for breaking into the car.

Dog kennels and pet hotels must check on animals once a day and provide elevated platforms in cat enclosures.

A dog seized from criminal fighting rings will no longer automatically be labeled “vicious” — which leads to it being euthanized. Instead, each dog will be evaluated to see whether it can be rehabilitated to safely re-enter society or be placed in a sanctuary.

Carbon monoxide gas chambers are banned in animal shelters for euthanizing animals.

Orca breeding and performance programs, like the one formerly run by SeaWorld theme parks, will be outlawed starting in June.

Felons serving sentences in county jails will be able to vote in California elections as part of an effort to speed their transition back into society.

Voters can now legally take a selfie with their completed ballot.

Voters are permitted to legally hand off their sealed ballot to anyone to mail or deliver in person.

More cities and counties can offer public financing of political campaigns.

City councils and county boards of supervisors are required to publicly announce pay and benefit increases for government executives before they are approved by a vote.

I know we’re a bunch of politically correct, latte sipping, out of touch elite losers. But that’s just how we roll.

Oh, and then there’s this:

If the state were stacked up against nations, California would be the seventh-largest economy, with an equivalent gross domestic product greater than Brazil’s. It’s not just big, but also booming. California had a 3.29 percent growth rate last year, more than five times that of No. 3 Japan, almost twice No. 4 Germany, about half again as much as No. 5 U.K., almost three times No. 6 France and a third more than No. 1 U.S.

California last year created the most jobs of any state, 483,000, more than the second- and third-most-populous states Florida and Texas combined (they added 257,900 and 175,700) and at a faster rate than any of the world’s developed economies. The pace of employment growth was almost triple the rate of job creation for the 19 countries that make up the euro zone and more than 3.5 times that of Japan, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The high taxes and ubiquitous regulation critics cite when assailing Golden State government are proving no impediment to business and investment. They may even be a benefit, as public policy and people’s preferences converge. Four of the world’s 10 largest companies are based in California. Two of them — Alphabet and Facebook — were conceived in the past 18 years. San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, the world’s largest bank by market capitalization, routinely outperforms any of its peers from Wall Street.

California produces almost all of the country’s almonds, apricots, dates, figs, kiwifruit, nectarines, olives, pistachios, prunes and walnuts among dozens of crops that make it No. 1 in the U.S., with an equivalent GDP from agriculture, forestry and hunting totaling more than $37.7 billion, dwarfing No. 2 Iowa’s $12.1 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. No state comes close to California in manufacturing totaling $255.6 billion. Texas is next with $239.1 billion. The trailing 12-month revenue from California technology companies totaled $732 billion, or 53 percent of all tech revenues in the U.S.

But, you know, we suck. Let’s see if Trump can “fix” us. You know he’ll try.

.

Donald Trump action figure

Donald Trump action figure

by digby

The Trump administration wants you to stop mocking him and start giving him credit for tweeting, lying and making a fool of America and himself as well as taking credit for things he hasn’t done. Oh and jump starting a new nuclear arms race and ginning up a war with China, our most important trading partner and military rival.

Here’s Trump press secretary Sean Spicer this morning:

So the idea is everyone wants to talk about the tweets he sent. But I would actually focus on the action he’s getting. Donald Trump is not president yet and he’s getting action, successes and wins, both abroad and here at home. 

Everything he does right now, he gets — he speaks for the head of Sprint, gets 5,000 jobs moved from abroad. And everyone starts to mock him. Oh, those jobs were already announced. They weren’t. The sales jobs have been a previous announce. These jobs were coming from abroad to America. 

And instead of trying to mock him or undermine him, it’s time that people started to give him credit for actually getting things done.

They really seem to think that people will believe these pathetic little cons are the most important things a president does. And that’s if they believe the lie that he actually did them, which he didn’t. All of his “announcements” were for things the companies were already planning to do.

And yes, I recognize that his cult followers think he’s a superhero who is “getting things done.” But it’s a fraud. But then that’s apparently what they like about him. He’s sticking it to the liberals and that’s more important than anything else in their lives. In fact, it’s more important than their lives.

.

The amoral president’s club

The amoral president’s club

by digby
I thought this was already well known but I guess this is just further proof:

Richard M. Nixon always denied it: to David Frost, to historians and to Lyndon B. Johnson, who had the strongest suspicions and the most cause for outrage at his successor’s rumored treachery. To them all, Nixon insisted that he had not sabotaged Johnson’s 1968 peace initiative to bring the war in Vietnam to an early conclusion. “My God. I would never do anything to encourage” South Vietnam “not to come to the table,” Nixon told Johnson, in a conversation captured on the White House taping system. 

Now we know Nixon lied. A newfound cache of notes left by H. R. Haldeman, his closest aide, shows that Nixon directed his campaign’s efforts to scuttle the peace talks, which he feared could give his opponent, Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey, an edge in the 1968 election. On Oct. 22, 1968, he ordered Haldeman to “monkey wrench” the initiative.

He was an amoral bastard. And not the last of his kind, sadly. We’re about to find out if an amoral bastard without brains is better than one who has them.

.

Repeat defenders by @BloggersRUs

Repeat defenders
by Tom Sullivan

A few weeks from now, Donald J. Trump will take the oath of office, becoming the country’s 45th president. He issued twisted New Year’s greetings yesterday to “my many enemies and those who have fought me and lost so badly they just don’t know what to do. Love!.” Based on the popular vote count that is over half the United States of America. In Trump’s old neighborhood, his message might amount to a throw down, as in it’s on.

Already the resistance is forming. Overnight, an invitation arrived to join a group, “I am a Resistor.” The group’s name and logo cleverly repurposes the circuitry symbol for an electrical resistor:

The group issues a call to action for January 19 to “RESIST in any (peaceful) way you can.” The site offers bland suggestions like writing your members of Congress, donating to the ACLU, and challenging people to visit a museum and bring friends wearing RESIST stickers. oh-kay.

It recalls that scene in Aliens when the Marine squad members receive orders to give up their live ammunition:

Private Hudson: Is he fuckin’ crazy?
Private Frost: What the hell are we supposed to use, man, harsh language?

Perhaps more effective than stickers will be a return to 1960s-style “democracy is in the streets,” as Jelani Cobb writes at the New Yorker:

Movements are born in the moments when abstract principles become concrete concerns. MoveOn arose in response to what was perceived as the Republican congressional overreach that resulted in the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. The Occupy movement was a backlash to the financial crisis. The message of Black Lives Matter was inspired by the death of Trayvon Martin and the unrest in Ferguson, Missouri. Occupy’s version of anti-corporate populism helped to create the climate in which Senator Bernie Sanders’s insurgent campaign could not only exist but essentially shape the Democratic Party platform. Black Lives Matter brought national attention to local instances of police brutality, prompting the Obama Administration to launch the Task Force on 21st Century Policing and helping defeat prosecutors in Chicago and Cleveland, who had sought reëlection after initially failing to bring charges against police officers accused of using excessive force.

[…]

In that context, the waves of protests in Portland, Los Angeles, Oakland, New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C., in the days after the election look less like spontaneous outrage and more like a preview of what the next four years may hold. Unlike the specific protests that emerged during the Obama Administration, the post-election demonstrations have been directed at the general state of American democracy. Two hundred thousand women are expected to assemble in front of the Capitol, on January 21st, the day after the Inauguration, for the Women’s March on Washington. Born of one woman’s invitation to forty friends, the event is meant as a rejoinder to the fact that a candidate with a troubling history regarding women’s rights—one who actually bragged about committing sexual assault—has made it to the White House.

But the most effective of the protests from half a century ago were those led by black clergy including Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. With the passage of the Voting Rights (1965) and Civil Rights Acts (1968) and the end of the Vietnam War, the American left’s partnership with black churches waned. With voting rights under assault again across the country, it is time to renew that partnership. Perhaps by repenting for letting it wane in the first place.

That partnership is already renewed in the Moral Monday protests that began in 2013 in North Carolina. Those protests against radical legislation included about 1,000 civil disobedience arrests, and are credited with helping defeat Gov. Pat McCrory in November. Some of those committed protesters — repeat defenders — were arrested again last month. Tom Jensen at Raleigh-based Public Policy Polling wrote:

But the Moral Monday movement pushed back hard. Its constant visibility forced all of these issues to stay in the headlines. Its efforts ensured that voters in the state were educated about what was going on in Raleigh, and as voters became aware of what was going on, they got mad. All those people who had seen McCrory as a moderate, as a different kind of Republican, had those views quickly changed. By July McCrory had a negative approval rating- 40% of voters approving of him to 49% who disapproved. By September it was all the way down to 35/53, and he never did fully recover from the damage the rest of his term.

Moral Mondays became a very rare thing- a popular protest movement. In August 2013 we found 49% of voters had a favorable opinion of the protesters to only 35% with an unfavorable opinion of them. And their message was resonating- 50% of voters in the state felt state government was causing North Carolina national embarrassment to only 34% who disagreed with that notion.

How effective similar actions might be against a Trump who enters office with his approval rating already under water remains to be seen, but applying pressure at the state level is where the Republican legislatures are most vulnerable. Trump may have won the presidency, but he won by defeating not one but two weakened parties. His is in control in most state capitols.

Ross Douthat observes today:

I had thought that the G.O.P. was run by true believers in a dated catechism. But really it was run by people for whom the Reaganite catechism only mattered because they controlled the inquisition, and once Trump’s army of heretics refused to disperse they had no stomach for a fight.

Even after Trump’s surprise win, that may still be true. The next question is do Democrats in the states have the stomach for a fight? Reverend Dr. William Barber II, leader of the Moral Mondays movement, was in Washington, D.C. last night gearing up to take North Carolina’s movement national. The Trump train is not the only one inviting people to get on board.

Happy New Year.

“Somebody will say, oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech. These are foolish people”

This post will stay at the top of the page for a while. Please scroll down for newer material.




“Somebody will say, ‘oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.’ These are foolish people”

by digby

Heading into the New Year week-end I just wanted to give another shout-out to all my readers who have contributed to the holiday fundraiser this year. I am deeply appreciative and grateful for the opportunity to write each day about the remarkable events in our world these days. So, thank you.

I don’t know what the next year will bring. I gave up predicting some time back. But I think it’s more than fair to assume it’s going to be eventful. We are in uncharted territory with a new leader at the top of a political party that has reached peak insanity in a world in which the very concept of truth is being challenged. It feels as though everything liberals and progressives care about is about to come under assault from a dozen different directions. It’s going to take a concerted effort just to understand it all much less figure out how to resist it.

I don’t have the answers about how to do that. But I do have a willingness to keep my eyes open and my mind as clear as I can keep it to sort through all the day to day chaos and try to see things as clearly as I can. If we can do that in this chaotic media environment I think we’re halfway there.

I hope you will come back to the site often as we try to get through what’s about to come. We’ll be here, day in and day out — at least until Trump “sees Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what’s happening to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that Internet up in some way.”

To which he added, of course, “somebody will say, ‘Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.’ These are foolish people.”

If you have not yet contributed to the holiday fundraiser but planned to do it, you can still do so below. And again, thanks for your kind generosity

Happy New Year everyone.



.

Saturday Night at the Movies

Saturday Night at the Movies

If you really must pry: Top 10 films of 2016

By Dennis Hartley

It’s hard to believe it’s been 10 years since my pal Digby graciously offered me a crayon, a sippy cup and a weekly play date on her otherwise grownup site so I can scribble about pop culture. I’d like to take this opportunity to thank everybody who continues to support Hullabaloo and wish you and yours the best in 2017! ‘Tis the season to do a year-end roundup of the best films I reviewed in 2016. Alphabetically, not in order of preference:

The Curve – It’s tempting to synopsize Rifqi Assaf’s road movie as “Little Miss Sunshine in the Arabian Desert” but that would be shortchanging this humanistic, warmly compassionate study of life in the modern Arab world. It’s essentially a three-character chamber piece, set in a VW van as it traverses desolate stretches of Jordan. Fate and circumstance unite a taciturn Palestinian who has been living in his van, with a chatty Palestinian divorcee returning to a Syrian refugee camp and an exiled Lebanese TV director. A beautifully directed and acted treatise on the commonalities that defy borders.
(Full review)

Eat That Question – If there’s a missing link between today’s creative types who risk persecution in the (virtual) court of public opinion for the sake of their art, and Lenny Bruce’s battles in the actual courts for the right to even continue practicing his art, I would nominate composer-musician-producer-actor-satirist-provocateur Frank Zappa, who is profiled in Thorsten Schutte’s documentary. Admittedly, the film plays best for members of the choir. If you’ve never been a fan, the largely non-contextualized pastiche of vintage clips will likely do little to win you over. Still, if you’re patient enough to observe, and absorb, the impressionistic approach manages to paint a compelling portrait.
(Full review)

Hail, Caesar! – Truth be told, the narrative is actually a bit thin in this fluffier-than-usual Coen Brothers outing; it’s primarily a skeleton around which they are able to construct a portmanteau of 50s movie parodies. That said, there is another level to the film, one which (similar to the 2015 film Trumbo) depicts the Red Scare-induced fear and paranoia that permeated the movie industry in the 1950s through the eyes of a slightly fictionalized real-life participant (in this case, a Hollywood “fixer” played by Josh Brolin). George Clooney hams it up as a dim-witted leading man who gets snatched off the set of his latest picture (a sword-and-sandal epic bearing a striking resemblance to Spartacus) by an enigmatic organization called The Future (don’t ask). It’s supremely silly, yet enjoyable.
(Full review)

Home Care – The “Kubler-Ross Model” postulates that there are five distinct emotional stages humans experience when brought face-to-face with mortality: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. All five are served up with a side of compassion, a dash of low-key anarchy and a large orange soda in this touching dramedy from Czech director Slavek Horak. An empathic, sunny-side-up Moravian home care nurse (Alena Mihulova) is so oriented to taking care of others that when the time comes to deal with her own health crisis, she’s stymied. A deft blend of family melodrama with gentle social satire. Mihulova and Boleslav Polivka (as her husband) make an endearing screen couple.
(Full review)

Jackie – Who among us (old enough to remember) hasn’t speculated on what it must have been like to be inside Jacqueline Kennedy’s head on November 22, 1963? Pablo Larrain’s film fearlessly wades right inside its protagonist’s psyche, fueled by a precisely measured, career-best performance from Natalie Portman in the titular role, and framed by a (fictional) interview session that the recently widowed Jackie has granted to a probing yet acquiescing journalist (Billy Crudup), which serves as the convenient launching platform for a series of flashbacks and flash-forwards. The narrative (and crucially, Portman’s performance) is largely internalized; resulting in a film that is more meditative, impressionistic and personalized than your standard-issue historical drama. The question of “why now?” might arise, to which I say (paraphrasing JFK)…“why not?”
(Full review)

Mekko – Director Sterlin Harjo’s tough, lean, neorealist character study takes place in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Rod Rondeaux (Meek’s Cutoff) is outstanding as the eponymous character, a Muscogee Indian who gets out of jail after 19 years of hard time. Bereft of funds and family support, he finds tenuous shelter amongst the rough-and-tumble “street chief” community of homeless Native Americans as he sorts out how he’s going to get back on his feet. Harjo coaxes naturalistic performances from all. There’s more here than meets the eye, with subtexts about Native American identity, assimilation and spirituality.
(Full review)

Older Than Ireland – “They” say with age, comes wisdom. Just don’t ask a centenarian to impart any, because they are likely to smack you. Not that there is any violence in Alex Fegan and Garry Walsh’s doc, but there is a consensus among interviewees (aged from 100-113 years) that the question they find most irksome is: “What’s your secret to living so long?” Once that hurdle is cleared, Fegan and Walsh’s subjects have much to impart in this wonderfully entertaining (and ultimately moving) pastiche of the human experience. Do yourself a favor: turn off your personal devices for 80 minutes, watch this wondrous film and plug into humankind’s forgotten backup system: the Oral Tradition.
(Full review)

Snowden – Oliver Stone had a tough act to follow (Laura Poitras’ Oscar-winning 2014 documentary, Citizenfour) when he tackled his biopic about Edgar Snowden, the former National Security Agency subcontractor who ignited an international political firestorm (and became a wanted fugitive) when he leaked top secret information to The Guardian back in 2013 regarding certain NSA surveillance practices, but he pulls it off quite well. This is actually a surprisingly restrained dramatization by Stone, which is not to say it is a weak one. In fact, quite the contrary-this time out, Stone had no need to take a magical trip to the wrong side of the wardrobe. That’s because the Orwellian machinations (casually conducted on a daily basis by our government) that came to light after Snowden lifted up the rock are beyond the most feverish imaginings of the tin foil hat society. Stylistically speaking, the film recalls cerebral cold war thrillers from the 1960s like The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, with a nuanced performance by Joseph Gordon-Levitt.
(Full review)

The Tunnel – Kim Seong-hun’s film is a (no pun intended) cracking good disaster thriller from South Korea, concerning a harried Everyman (Ha Jung-woo) who gets trapped in his car when a mountain tunnel collapses on top of him. Now, I should make it clear that this is not a Hollywood-style disaster thriller, a la Roland Emmerich. That said, it does have thrills, and spectacle, but not at the expense of its humanity. This, combined with emphasis on characterization, makes it the antithesis of formulaic big-budget disaster flicks (typically agog with CGI yet bereft of IQ). There’s more than meets the eye here; much akin to Billy Wilder’s Ace in the Hole, Seong-hun uses the “big carnival” allusions of the mise-en-scene outside the tunnel to commentate on how members of the media and the political establishment share an alchemist’s knack for turning calamity into capital.
(Full review)

Weiner – Co-directors Josh Kriegman and Elyse Steinberg were given remarkable access to Anthony Weiner, his family and campaign staffers during the course of his ill-fated 2013 N.Y.C. mayoral run. Their no-holes-barred film raises many interesting questions prompted in the wake of the former congressman’s “sexting” scandal (which led to his resignation from the U.S. House of Representatives in 2011)…the most obvious one being: should ‘we’ be willing to forgive personal indiscretions (barring prosecutable criminal offenses) of those we have voted into office? After all, if making boneheaded decisions in one’s love life was a crime, there would be barely enough politicians left outside of prison to run the country. Then there’s this chestnut: WTF were you thinking?! If you’re curious to see the film because you think it answers that one, don’t waste your time. However, if you want to see an uncompromising, refreshingly honest documentary about how down and dirty campaigns can get for those in the trenches, this is a must-see.
(Full review)

Posts with related themes:

Top 10 films of 2015

More reviews at Den of Cinema

–Dennis Hartley

Happy New Year everyone.


.