Skip to content

Month: February 2017

Makes you proud to be an American

Makes you proud to be an American

by digby

Yesterday, our president held a press conference with Benjamin Netanyahu.  He did us proud as usual, showing that the world’s only superpower is run by a gibbering fool:

Q    Mr. President, since your election campaign and even after your victory, we’ve seen a sharp rise in anti-Semitic incidents across the United States.  And I wonder what you say to those among the Jewish community in the States, and in Israel, and maybe around the world who believe and feel that your administration is playing with xenophobia and maybe racist tones.

PRESIDENT TRUMP:  Well, I just want to say that we are very honored by the victory that we had — 306 Electoral College votes.  We were not supposed to crack 220.  You know that, right?  There was no way to 221, but then they said there’s no way to 270.  And there’s tremendous enthusiasm out there.  

I will say that we are going to have peace in this country.  We are going to stop crime in this country.  We are going to do everything within our power to stop long-simmering racism and every other thing that’s going on, because lot of bad things have been taking place over a long period of time.  

I think one of the reasons I won the election is we have a very, very divided nation.  Very divided.  And, hopefully, I’ll be able to do something about that.  And, you know, it was something that was very important to me.

As far as people — Jewish people — so many friends, a daughter who happens to be here right now, a son-in-law, and three beautiful grandchildren.  I think that you’re going to see a lot different United States of America over the next three, four, or eight years.  I think a lot of good things are happening, and you’re going to see a lot of love.  You’re going to see a lot of love.  Okay?  Thank you.

He also said casually that he doesn’t care about a two state solution, changing decades of American policy and told Netanyahu that he wants him to take a break from building settlements, which was nice, although it’s pretty clear he had no earthly idea what he was saying.

He also only took questions from sycophantic wingnut media outlets Christian Broadcast Network and Townhall.com.

.
.

Sessions needs to recuse himself

Sessions needs to recuse himself


by digby

I wrote about “the investigation” for Salon this morning:

Remember the final debate of the presidential campaign? That was when Donald Trump looked right at Hillary Clinton and growled, “If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation because there has never been so many lies, so much deception.” If he were president, he told her, “you’d be in jail.” Well, the worm has turned.

Trump may be president now, but one month into his presidency there are already calls for a special prosecutor and an independent bipartisan commission to investigate his ties to the Russian government and its involvement in the election. All this comes, of course, in the wake of the resignation of Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Flynn. There is also growing consternation over new Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ involvement in any investigation. Considering that he was heavily involved in Trump’s campaign — which would presumably be a central subject of that investigation — it is totally inappropriate for him to oversee the case.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer issued a statement on Wednesday demanding that Sessions recuse himself from the investigation.

[Flynn’s] resignation raises more questions than it answers and the American people deserve the truth. . . . I believe that Attorney General Sessions has no choice but to recuse himself, and then he should and must put an independent investigative authority in charge.

Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., went even further, saying, “This really merits an independent investigation. It’s not an investigation that should take place by Jeff Sessions. Jeff Sessions is too tied to the campaign, too tied to the president. It needs to be an independent or a special prosecutor.” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi called for a 9/11-style commission.

And as MSNBC’s Chris Hayes tweeted on Wednesday:
If Lynch had to recuse herself to being on an airplane w Bill Clinton for 30 minutes, then *clearly* Sessions has to recuse himself.

It’s worth briefly revisiting the Loretta Lynch “tarmac meeting” to get a little perspective. Last June the then-attorney general and former President Bill Clinton had a chance 30-minute meeting at the Phoenix airport. This was seen by the Republicans as obvious proof that Lynch was colluding with the campaign to let Hillary Clinton off the hook for having kept a private email server when she was secretary of state. Lynch quickly recused herself from the case, saying she would accept the recommendation of the prosecutors. James Comey, the FBI director, subsequently announced there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing in the email case, and that should have been that.

But that’s not what happened, as we know. Just three days before the election, former New York mayor and top Trump surrogate Rudy Giuliani wrote this:

Attorney General Lynch and former President Clinton met on the Phoenix, Arizona tarmac days before Secretary Clinton was to be interviewed by the FBI for possible criminal activity. It has been reported that her staff ordered witnesses not to take pictures and no one was present during their 39-minute conversation. General Lynch never recused herself from decisions on the Clinton investigation after her self-admitted “mistake,” as it has also been reported that she continues to deny the FBI the authority to convene a Grand Jury, which is necessary for any meaningful investigation.

Yes, the Trump forces tried to insist on a grand jury to investigate that single meeting. Today we have an attorney general who was knee-deep in the presidential campaign that now is (or soon will be) under investigation. Sessions stumped for Trump all over the country, gave a nomination speech at the Republican convention and was touted as “the clearinghouse for policy and philosophy” for the Trump administration.


Most importantly, Sessions was the chairman of Trump’s national security advisory committee during the campaign. When he was named to that position in March, Sessions said, “I am grateful for the opportunity to recommend and facilitate discussions among exceptional and experienced American military and diplomatic leaders to share insight and advice with Donald Trump, regardless of their political views.” Does it seem appropriate for someone in that post to be in charge of the investigation of the Trump campaign’s suspected connections to the Russian government?

At this moment there’s no evidence that Sessions was involved with or aware of the Russian contacts during the campaign, but there were certainly many more opportunities for him to hear about them than, say, during a one half-hour chat on a tarmac.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., asked Sessions if he planned to recuse himself from any investigation pertaining to Flynn’s communications. He replied, “I am not aware of a basis to recuse myself from such matters,” but promised to consult the Justice Department’s ethics officials if he felt his “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

One issue here is that the Justice Department regulation requiring employees to recuse themselves if they have a personal or political relationship with anyone “substantially involved” in an investigation applies only to criminal cases. It appears Michael Flynn will not be charged with any criminal wrongdoing. After the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee asked the Justice Department to hand over documents and briefings on Flynn’s resignation on Wednesday, the FBI precipitously announced that Flynn would face no criminal charges. That serendipitously lets Sessions off the hook, at least in that regard.

Whether the attorney general’s “impartiality might reasonably be questioned” is quite another matter, to be sure. Over the years Sessions has proved himself to be a ruthless partisan player when it comes to special prosecutors. He is full of praise for them when it suits his purpose and disdainful when they are not. Think Progress turned up one memorably ironic example from 1999, when Sessions defended independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s successor Robert Ray by saying:

[T]o say it is like Russia, I don’t appreciate that one bit. What is like Russia is when leaders lie, cheat, steal, and maintain their office. That is what happens in a country such as Russia, not in a free democracy where all Americans are equal and have a right to know that every other public official is equal and subject to the law just as they are.

Considering that we are already looking at a major scandal in which the president is accused of lying, cheating and potentially stealing, it appears that President Trump has put Sessions in a tough spot. But as Jonathan Schwarz pointed out for the Intercept, Trump can very easily put his Republican defenders out of their misery and end the scandal immediately if he really wants to: He could declassify the government intercepts of communications between Russian nationals and anyone connected to his campaign.

Unfortunately, this is a president who has refused to release his tax returns, as all his recent predecessors have done, so transparency and openness obviously won’t be hallmarks of the Trump administration. But if the president truly has nothing to hide, he has the means to prove it.

.

Just give a toy and let him play in the corner

Just give a toy and let him play in the corner

by digby

Whatever you do, don’t tell him anything you don’t want spilled to others:

U.S. intelligence officials have withheld sensitive intelligence from President Donald Trump because they are concerned it could be leaked or compromised, according to current and former officials familiar with the matter.

The officials’ decision to keep information from Mr. Trump underscores the deep mistrust that has developed between the intelligence community and the president over his team’s contacts with the Russian government, as well as the enmity he has shown toward U.S. spy agencies. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump accused the agencies of leaking information to undermine him.

In some of these cases of withheld information, officials have decided not to show Mr. Trump the sources and methods that the intelligence agencies use to collect information, the current and former officials said. Those sources and methods could include, for instance, the means that an agency uses to spy on a foreign government.

A White House official said: “There is nothing that leads us to believe that this is an accurate account of what is actually happening.”

A spokesman for the Office of Director of National Intelligence said: “Any suggestion that the U.S. intelligence community is withholding information and not providing the best possible intelligence to the president and his national security team is not true.”

Intelligence officials have in the past not told a president or members of Congress about the ins and outs of how they ply their trade. At times, they have decided that secrecy is essential for protecting a source, and that all a president needs to know is what that source revealed and what the intelligence community thinks is important about it.

But in these previous cases in which information was withheld, the decision wasn’t motivated by a concern about a president’s trustworthiness or discretion, the current and former officials said.

It wasn’t clear Wednesday how many times officials have held back information from Mr. Trump.

The officials emphasized that they know of no instance in which crucial information about security threats or potential plotting has been omitted. Still, the misgivings that have emerged among intelligence officials point to the fissures spreading between the White House and the U.S. spy agencies.
[…]
“I’ve talked with people in the intelligence community that do have concerns about the White House, about the president, and I think those concerns take a number of forms,” Mr. Schiff said, without confirming any specific incidents. “What the intelligence community considers their most sacred obligation is to protect the very best intelligence and to protect the people that are producing it.”

“I’m sure there are people in the community who feel they don’t know where he’s coming from on Russia,” Mr. Schiff said.

Tensions between the spy agencies and Mr. Trump were pronounced even before he took office, after he publicly accused the Central Intelligence Agency and others of leaking information about alleged Russian hacking operations to undermine the legitimacy of his election win. In a meandering speech in front of a revered CIA memorial the day after his inauguration, Mr. Trump boasted about the size of his inaugural crowd and accused the media of inventing a conflict between him and the agencies.

In a news conference on Wednesday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, Mr. Trump again lashed out at the media and intelligence officials, whom he accused of “criminal” leaks about Mr. Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador last December.

Mr. Trump didn’t explain Wednesday why he asked for Mr. Flynn’s resignation. Instead, he suggested the leaks and the media were to blame for his ouster.

“General Flynn is a wonderful man. I think he’s been treated very, very unfairly by the media,” Mr. Trump said. “And I think it’s really a sad thing that he was treated so badly.”

“I think in addition to that from intelligence, papers are being leaked, things are being leaked,” Mr. Trump said. “It’s criminal action. It’s a criminal act and it’s been going on for a long time before me but now it’s really going on.”

Reviving his line of criticism against intelligence officials during the transition, Mr. Trump said the “illegally leaked” information was from people with political motivations. “People are trying to cover up for a terrible loss that the Democrats had under Hillary Clinton,” Mr. Trump said.

A person close to Mr. Trump said he was reluctant to let go of Mr. Flynn because Mr. Flynn had vigorously supported him at a stage of his presidential campaign when few people did. Mr. Trump also felt Mr. Flynn did nothing wrong in his conversations with the U.S. ambassador to Russia and had good intentions.

“They both continue to support each other,” this person said.

For intelligence veterans, who had hoped that Mr. Trump’s feud with the agencies might have subsided, Wednesday’s comments renewed and deepened concerns.

“This is not about who won the election. This is about concerns about institutional integrity,” said Mark Lowenthal, a former senior intelligence official.

“It’s probably unprecedented to have this difficult a relationship between a president and the intelligence agencies,” Mr. Lowenthal said. “I can’t recall ever seeing this level of friction. And it’s just not good for the country.”

The president is a childish imbecile. That’s just a fact.

In the midst of all this, when his administration is coming apart at the seams, they’ve decided he needs a little outing. They’ve planned another one of his Nuremberg rallies this week-end to pick up his spirits and so he can delude himself that everyone loves him.

He’s a pathetic piece of work and everyone in Washington is scared to death he’s going to somehow kill us all. Well, not the congressional Republicans who are working as fast as they can to put whatever odious wet dream legislation they can get done in front of the fool’s nose before this whole thing implodes.

Meanwhile, the chaos continues.

.

Trump: King of kings by @BloggersRUs

Trump: King of kings
by Tom Sullivan

Rather than having President Donald Trump take the witness stand and asking what he knew and when he knew it, we ought to ask the same of the people who voted for him. Instead of court, maybe they ought to go to confession, and his party with them.

Trump’s un-presidency already recalls a B. Kliban cartoon of people standing around the “Nixon Monument” staring into a hole in the ground.

Responding to this week’s controversies, the usually mild-mannered E.J. Dionne has sharpened his pen and is already calling for a select committee to investigate Trump’s loyalties:

The Michael Flynn fiasco was the entirely predictable product of the indiscipline, deceit, incompetence and moral indifference that characterize Donald Trump’s approach to leadership.

Even worse, Trump’s loyalties are now in doubt. Questions about his relationship with Vladimir Putin and Russia will not go away, even if congressional Republicans try to slow-walk a transparent investigation into what ties Trump has with Putin’s Russia — and who on his campaign did what, and when, with Russian intelligence officials and diplomats.

People voted for Trump because they liked his style. He would shake up Washington and wrest control from career politicians. He would run it like his business. Indeed he is: he’s being sued from coast to coast.

One month into his presidency, his chief of staff is scrambling “to bring order to a White House that looks to be spiraling out of control.”

One month into his presidency, the Republican-led House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is inching (albeit reluctantly) towards investigating Michael Flynn’s and the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia and “serious concerns about the potential protection of classified information.”

One month into his presidency, acting on those concerns and to protect sources and methods, intelligence agencies are keeping some sensitive information from the president of the United States.

Dionne asks whether the so-recently-elected Trump deserves some benefit of the doubt:

The answer is no, because the Trump we are seeing now is fully consistent with the vindictive, self-involved and scattered man we saw during the 17 months of his campaign. In one of the primary debates, Jeb Bush said of Trump: “He’s a chaos candidate and he’d be a chaos president.” Rarely has a politician been so prophetic.

Ozymandias, king of kings.

QOTD: A general

QOTD: A general

by digby

Uhm:

“Our government continues to be in unbelievable turmoil. I hope they sort it out soon because we’re a nation at war,” Army Gen. Raymond “Tony” Thomas told a symposium in Maryland. 

Asked later about his comments, Thomas, a veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan, said: “As a commander, I’m concerned our government be as stable as possible.”

As a citizen I agree.

Here’s the thing. The White House is leaking like a sieve. Career civil servants are leaking too. The intelligence community and federal law enforcement are leaking like crazy. Now we have generals speaking publicly about how the government is in turmoil.

This is not a question of the spooks stabbing the president in the back because he promised to shake things up and they don’t like it. It’s entirely possible that’s part of it and Deep State players exerting their power that way is normally cause for great concern. But Donald Trump has not given any indication that he is an enemy of their prerogatives generally. He loves torture and thinks surveillance should be expanded to everyone. He wants Snowden executed. So the only beef they have with him is the fact that he called them Nazis on twitter and this reaction seems a little extreme if that’s their problem.

Clearly something much bigger is at work here and it’s not just coming from the jackboots and the spooks. Everyone in government, including some members of  his own staff, is trying to slow down or somehow contain this narcissistic imbecile and his band of fascist weirdos. And that’s not because thee leakers are a bunch of neoliberal elites trying to thwart the agenda of the one true voice of the working man. It’s because what they are seeing unfold is scaring the living shit out of them.

.

Why people shouldn’t stop caring about the Trump Organization’s corrupt dealings

Why people shouldn’t stop caring about the Trump Organization’s corrupt dealings

by digby

According to this Newsweek report, foreign allies are collecting intel on Trump’;s ties to Russia, which I think we probably knew. (We knew about the British anyway.)

But this is of continuing interest — to me, at least:

To date, the Republican-controlled Congress has declined to conduct hearings to investigate the links between Trump’s overseas business partners and foreign governments, or the activities between Russia and officials in the Trump campaign and administration—the very areas being examined by the intelligence services of at least two American allies.

Some details about Trump’s business partners were passed to the American government months ago. For example, long before the president’s inauguration, German electronic surveillance determined that the father of Trump’s Azerbaijani business partner is a government official who laundered money for the Iranian military; that information was shared with the CIA, according to a European source with direct knowledge of the situation.

Of equal concern to our allies is Trump’s business partner in the Philippines, who is also the special representative to Washington of that country’s president, Rodrigo Duterte. This government official, Jose E.B. Antonio, is the head of Century Properties, which in turn is a partner with the president’s business in the construction of Trump Tower at Century City in Makati, Philippines. According to people with direct knowledge of the situation, a European intelligence service has obtained the contracts and other legal documents in the deal between the Trump Organization and Antonio. That deal has already resulted in large payments to Trump’s business, with millions of dollars more on the way—all coming from an agent of the Philippine president.

The financial relationship between an American president and the Philippine government comes at a time when the historic alliance between the West and the Southeast Asian country is under great stress. Since the election last year of Duterte, a campaign of slaughter has gripped the Philippines, with death squads murdering thousands of suspected drug users in the streets. The carnage, which intelligence officials have concluded is being conducted with Duterte’s involvement, has been condemned throughout the Western world; the Parliament of the European Union and two United Nations human rights experts have urged Duterte to end the massacre.

Duterte has responded by signaling his government could tilt its alliances away from the West, instead turning to China as its primary ally. Such a move could be devastating, given that the American armed forces maintains large military bases there. The situation with the Philippines “is already an enormous challenge,” one official with direct knowledge of the European intelligence operations said. “President Trump’s business there is a complicating factor that we are trying to assess.”

There’s more about Rex Tillerson and the Russian energy sector which is a very live subject in Europe, for obvious reasons.

I know it’s all like something out of a cheap novel. But the Trump Organization, now being run day to day by Uday and Qusay, is not withdrawing from its global business dealings. They’re pretty much doing whatever they want knowing there’s nothing anyone will do to stop them and that nobody really cares if they become the richest men in the world by selling the United States foreign policy to the highest bidder.

It is causing lots of problems regardless, since the world order that’s been in place for 60 years has just been completely upended by the election of this corrupt imbecile as the leader of the world’s only super power. Regardless of how you feel about America’s role, simply blowing everything up and hoping with all your might that everything turns out ok is not a rational way to change things. Trump’s half-wit boys are running all over the world making “deals” without having the first clue about the larger ramifications.

.

Sucking the air out of the room … literally

Sucking the air out of the room

by digby

Making America Polluted Again. NYC, 1966

So this should change the subject for a few minutes…

President Trump aims to sign executive orders cutting into the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) climate work shortly after his nominee to lead the agency is confirmed by the Senate, according to a report.

Trump will attend a swearing-in ceremony for EPA Administrator nominee Scott Pruitt at agency headquarters after the Senate confirms Pruitt, Inside EPA reported this week.

At that event, an administration source told Inside EPA that Trump will sign executive orders related to the agency’s climate work and that they could “suck the air out of the room,” according to the report.

The official did not say how many orders Trump will sign or what they will address. But the planned event could be similar to one Trump held at the Pentagon after Defense Secretary James Mattis was sworn in.

At that event, Trump signed an executive order cracking down on immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days and halting the U.S. refugee program for 120, including indefinitely banning Syrian refugees.

An administration official said a potential Trump visit to EPA headquarters has yet to be confirmed.

Senate Republicans are aiming to vote on Pruitt’s nomination this week. Nearly every Democrat is likely to oppose Pruitt, but he is expected to have enough Republican support to win confirmation.

Trump has vowed to roll back Obama-era EPA actions, including major climate change regulations like the Clean Power Plan and a water jurisdiction rule opposed by many conservatives.

One executive order, according to Inside EPA’s report, could be aimed at the State Department, suggesting Trump will take a position on the United States’s participation in the Paris climate deal. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told the Senate last month that he hopes to stay in that climate pact.

Trump’s actions are likely to cheer fossil fuel groups and conservatives who resisted Obama’s climate work. But environmentalists are certain to oppose Trump’s efforts.

Responding to the report on Wednesday, the Sierra Club said, “It would mean he is declaring open season on our air, water and climate while further destabilizing our role in the world.”

Yeah, well. It’s all a Chinese hoax.  And fake news. Don’t worry your pretty little heads about it.

And buy gas mask futures.

.

Trump is not a peacenik #776

Trump is not a peacenik #776

by digby

December 2015:

MIKA BRZEZINSKI (HOST): Yeah, do you like Vladmir Putin’s comments about you?

DONALD TRUMP: Sure. When people call you brilliant it’s always good, especially when the person heads up Russia.

JOE SCARBOROUGH (HOST): Well, also is a person that kills journalists, political opponents

WILLIE GEIST: And invades countries.

SCARBOROUGH: And invades countries, obviously, that would be a concern, would it not?

TRUMP: He’s running his country and at least he’s a leader, unlike what we have in this country.

SCARBOROUGH: But again, he kills journalist that don’t agree with him.

TRUMP: Well, I think our country does plenty of killing also, Joe. You know. There’s a lot of stuff going on in the world right now, Joe. A lot of killing going on and a lot of stupidity, and that’s the way it is. You didn’t ask me the question. You asked me a different question. That’s fine.

SCARBOROUGH: I’m confused. So you obviously condemn Vladimir Putin killing journalists and political opponents, right?

TRUMP: Oh sure, absolutely.

SCARBOROUGH: Alright. So how would America’s relationship with Russia change if you were president?

TRUMP: Well, i think it would be good. I’ve always felt fine about Putin. I think he is a strong leader. He’s a powerful leader. He’s represented his country, and that’s the way the country is being represented. He’s actually got popularity within his country. They respect him as a leader. Certainly over the last couple of years they’ve respected him as the leader. I think he’s up in the 80s, which is you see where Obama’s in 30s and low 40s, and he’s up in the 80s.

I’m not a big believer in American exceptionalism, as people who have read this blog for years know.  But I’m really not crazy about thuggish autocrats like Vladimir Putin either. Trump admires him for being a “strong leader” and that’s because he’s willing to bring the hammer down on people who disagree with him. That’s what “respect” is to Trump — fear and power.   And he thinks that America has been way too soft in this regard.

I uhm, disagree with that. The “American exceptionalism” line has infuriated me, but it’s also true that millions of people have worked hard to evolve and have succeeded, if only in fits and starts.  America’s behavior has been shameful in hundreds of different ways  I’ve spent my life opposing wars and violent interference overseas and police state behavior at home.  But just because we have been hypocritical doesn’t mean we should just say “to hell with it” and openly embrace Vladimir Putin’s approach instead.

I know it’s hard to believe, but there are actually worse things in this world than being hypocritical. And using hypocrisy as a way to show that “both sides” are equally wrong is just as lazy as anything David Broder ever said.

By the way, Trump’s approval rating is stuck at 40%.

.

How’d this work out for us?

How’d this work out for us?

by digby

The New York Times front page the week before the election:

Yesterday:

The authorities knew about this before the election.

This is another layer to this story that hopefully will be exposed some day. What was going on in the FBI before the election? Are they happy with their work today? If they are, we have bigger problems than we know.

.

Poor Trumpie doesn’t like being mocked

Poor Trumpie doesn’t like being mocked

by digby

Has there ever been a more childish president?

“Saturday Night Live” has taken to habitually poking fun at the Trump administration, but a skit depicting White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon as the Grim Reaper manipulating President Trump reportedly struck a chord with Trump, The Washington Post said Tuesday.

In the sketch, which aired earlier this month, Bannon — portrayed by an actor in a Grim Reaper costume — encourages Trump to engage in a number of unprofessional and confrontational phone calls with world leaders, including Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Bannon then asks Trump, portrayed by Alec Baldwin, to get up from his desk. Trump responds, “Yes, of course, Mr. President,” before sitting at a smaller desk and playing with a toy.

Trump also reportedly got upset with the late-night sketch comedy show after actress Melissa McCarthy portrayed White House press secretary Sean Spicer. Of particular issue to the president, Politico reported, was that his press secretary was played by a woman.

He’s going to crack up.

.