Skip to content

Month: February 2017

The unctuous Jason Caffetz’s latest hits

The unctuous Jason Caffetz’s latest hits

by digby

Utah congressman Jason Chaffetz first said that the angry people at his townhall were all paid protesters and now he says they are just a small minority and that the rest of Utah loves him very much.

He also said that he is completely unbiased when it comes to doing his job as the Chairman of the House oversight committee and that nothing will deter him from doing it:

The congressman, who chairs the House Oversight Committee, dismissed suggestions that he is overlooking President Donald Trump’s potential conflicts of interest at the President’s request.

Chaffetz said Trump told him in January during a Republican retreat in Philadelphia that he has “a job to do” and not to “slow down.”

“‘You go after everything you want to go after,’” Chaffetz said Trump told him.

He probably did say that. But how much do you want to bet that the context of the conversation was about whether Trump would be upset if Chaffetz decided to pursue his jihad against Hillary Clinton.

Come on. January? Look at what he wrote in that instagram above.

Chaffetz has already made it clear that is is impossible for President Trump to be corrupt. Indeed, even if he were seen taking bags of money directly from Phillippines president Ricardo Duterte in the oval office in return for free aircraft carriers, there is nothing anyone could do about it because there is no specific law against a president taking bribes in the oval office. He’s the president. He can do whatever he believes is necessary to “protect” the country.

His hands are tied.

.

A moment of zen

A moment of zen

by digby

I know you’ve seen it by now. But I just had to memorialize it on the blog.

Trump has a history of awkward, weird, and cringe-inducing handshakes, such as when he bro-hugged Kanye West at Trump Tower, and when he jerked Judge Neil Gorsuch’s arm so hard, he pulled him off-balance. In fact, that wasn’t even his first strange handshake with Abe that day; when Abe arrived at the White House, Trump greeted him as he emerged from his car, hugged him, clasped both of Abe’s hands, then hugged him again. He also recently pulled the arm-jerking move on Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who then jerked back, and the the two played tug of war until it looked like they were sawing an imaginary log together. His method with Vice President Mike Pence varies; sometimes he jerks his arm, sometimes he tries to kiss him.

I’m so old I remember when Americans insisted they had to have a regular guy president they’d like to have a beer with. Those same people voted for this freak.

.

Don’t invest in a weed company just yet

Don’t invest in a weed company just yet

by digby

My rop financial advice for 2017, based upon my piece for Salon this morning about the odious Jeff Sessions:

From the flurry of leaks coming out of the Trump administration over the weekend it appears that the chaos is only getting worse. National security adviser Michael Flynn is under fire over lying about talking to the Russian embassy about sanctions during the transition. The White House is already said to be looking for replacements for chief of staff Reince Priebus and press secretary Sean Spicer. The Japanese prime minister’s state visit was a bit of a mess, culminating with a bizarre and somewhat frightening story about Trump and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe discussing secret information about the North Korean missile launch at a public dinner table at Mar-a-Lago surrounded by customers, some of whom were taking pictures of the national security staff.

no worries guys. it’s cool. the woman who shot that photo of Trump is a rando from Jupiter, FL who used to work at Juicy Couture pic.twitter.com/Rc9yIizPFk

— Tim Dickinson (@7im) February 13, 2017

Up until that point, one might have assumed that the appearances of top Trump adviser Stephen Miller on all the Sunday morning shows would be the scariest moments of the day, particularly the one on “Face the Nation” where the 31-year-old White House wunderkind proclaimed:

… our opponents, the media and the whole world will soon see as we begin to take further actions, that the powers of the president to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned.

The president tweeted that he was very pleased with Miller’s performances, which isn’t surprising since the two have had a meeting of the minds ever since Miller left the cozy confines of Jeff Sessions’ Senate office for the Trump campaign in January of 2016.

Indeed, the best part of Trump’s week had to have been the vote to confirm his attorney general. With Sessions in place at the Justice Department, the likelihood of Trump being able to avoid any serious investigation into his corrupt business activities or foreign influence are substantially increased. That is surely a relief.

While the White House may be a total mess and much of the executive branch is being run by neophytes and fools, the Justice Department is likely to be one agency that functions. Its most obvious and immediate focus will be on immigration and vote suppression, two issues of very special concern to both Trump and Sessions. But the Department of Justice has a vast area of responsibility and Sessions is sure to apply his specific brand of extremism to all of them. He’s been waiting for this opportunity for many, many years.

Jeff Sessions was a hardcore “law and order” prosecutor and a hanging judge, and he has not mellowed with age. He publicly admired Trump for his notorious “Central Park Five” ad in which he called for the death penalty for five suspects who were later found to be innocent of the crime. Those who are wrongfully convicted should probably not look to the Department of Justice to admit wrongdoing. His stated view is that charges of prosecutorial misconduct are a form of abuse by defense attorneys, who he contends are constantly “outgunning the prosecutors.” He will do everything in his power to protect even the dirtiest of prosecutors, because he sees them as the real victims in the justice system.

Sessions likewise believes that the police are at a terrible disadvantage in America, under siege by criminals and a politically correct society that subjects them to unfair restrictions. He is on record against the use of federal investigations and enforcement of consent decrees to compel corrupt and violent police department to change their cultures, saying that “one of the most dangerous, and rarely discussed, exercises of raw power is the issuance of expansive court decrees. Consent decrees have a profound effect on our legal system as they constitute an end run around the democratic process.”

By that, Sessions essentially meant that local police departments should not be subject to federal civil rights enforcement. If people of color or other minority groups don’t like the way they’re treated they can vote out the politicians who hire the police officers. (Assuming, of course, that they will be allowed to vote.) Whatever the Justice Department may have once done to combat discrimination, excessive force and unfair sentencing it will do no longer.

We can say goodbye to any thoughts of the attorney general’s office supporting sentencing reform. Indeed, Sessions appears to believe that most sentences are far too short, particularly for drug crimes, on which he is a full-fledged zealot. With a couple of rare exceptions has been opposed to all the recent efforts at prison and sentencing reform. He believes that the only way to reduce demand for drugs is to send drug users to prison for long mandatory terms.

Addressing the current opioid epidemic last year, Sessions said, “We can wish that we could just turn away and reduce law enforcement, but I do believe that we’re going to have to enhance prosecutions. There just is no other solution.” He is convinced that the drug war was a huge success, and people are only using drugs today because the government gave up and backed down.

Nobody knows just yet how Sessions will deal with the burgeoning legal marijuana industry in various states. He is on record saying that “good people don’t smoke marijuana,” a statement that apparently embraced both medical and recreational use. Let’s just say that if you’re thinking of making a big investment in that industry, you might want to wait and see how the new DOJ decides to treat this issue.

Sessions will also be in charge of terrorist prosecutions, and we already know he won’t be terribly concerned with domestic terrorism committed by non-Muslims (unless they happen to be left-wingers or “eco-terrorists”). He’ll be likely to let the FBI do whatever it wants when it comes to surveillance and domestic spying. There will be little or no restraint on the basis of civil liberties.

Jeff Sessions is an angry man who believes that American society is under threat not just from foreigners or immigrants or rival powers. He believes American is also under threat from within — from American citizens who must be kept under control by harsh discipline inflicted by government authorities. He is a definitely an old-line traditionalist, but not one of those conservatives who talks a lot about freedom and liberty. That’s because he doesn’t really believe in them.

Gaslighting the corruption

Gaslighting the corruption

by digby

Look at this:

U.S. President Donald Trump’s sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump are expected to visit Dubai this week to open a Trump-branded golf complex.

Trump’s sons will be the guests of honor for the opening of the Trump International Golf Club Dubai on Feb. 18, according to an invitation sent to guests by Dubai-listed developer DAMAC Properties.

DAMAC and real-estate mogul Trump announced in 2013 it would build the complex in its $6-billion, 28-million-square-foot ‘Akoya by DAMAC’ development. DAMAC pays a licensing fee to the Trump Organization to use the Trump brand.

Last month, then-President-elect Trump said he turned down a $2-billion deal offered by DAMAC Chairman Hussain Sajwani because he did not want to “take advantage”. DAMAC later confirmed the offer.

Trump has been criticized for not distancing himself enough from his family business, the Trump Organization, since he was elected president in November.

The New York Times ran a huge front page story today about the boys quest to make zillions to make their president daddy proud:

Back home in the United States, they are planning to open a new boutique hotel chain, Scion, in perhaps 30 cities.

With the aggressive push forward, though, comes the persistent thrum of ethical qualm.

Just last week, news that Eric had traveled to the Dominican Republic to restart a stalled project there prompted controversy, given the Trump Organization’s pledge of no new overseas deals. The Washington Post reported that when Eric visited Uruguay on business in January, the trip cost taxpayers nearly $100,000 in hotel bills for the required Secret Service agents and for embassy staff members. Also echoing through the office at Trump Tower was the dust-up over the decision by Nordstrom and several other retailers to stop selling their sister Ivanka’s clothing line.

Don Jr. called that “disgusting,” and both brothers said their father was right to take Nordstrom and other retailers to task publicly in Ivanka’s defense.

“He’s Papa Bear,” Eric said.

Despite pressure to do so, President Trump has not sold any of his assets, which include a stake in a half-dozen office buildings, more than a dozen golf courses and at least 15 hotels that the company owns or manages. Instead, he has signed over control of day-to-day operations of his privately held company to the two sons and Allen Weisselberg, a trusted lieutenant at the Trump Organization, with an agreement not to discuss company business.

The arrangement and the president’s decision to not release his taxes have brought widespread criticism from liberal groups and even the federal government’s top ethics watchdog, Walter M. Shaub Jr., the director of the Office of Government Ethics. President Trump has continued to frequent his commercial properties, including over the weekend in Florida, bringing them global media attention and potential new customers.

But the brothers say they are convinced that they and their father have taken sufficient steps to create a management structure that will allow them to avoid creating the kind of appearance of conflict of interest that plagued Hillary Clinton as secretary of state while her husband continued to operate the Clinton Foundation. The measures they have taken, they say, have included explicit instructions to their domestic and international business partners not to reach out to anyone in the United States government for help.

Oh,ok. As long as they have given explicit instructions to the staff it’s all good. And they certainly won’t say anything to their daddy because they crossed their hearts and hoped to die.

What is it like — after a lifetime as the sons of Donald Trump, and now business executives in their own right, and even co-stars in a reality television show — to be the sons of the president of the United States?

“It’s bigger, it’s bigger,” Eric said, struggling for the right word, then turning to a superlative, a habit inherited from his father. “This is really the biggest thing in the world.”

You have to read the whole thing to get the full flavor of the brothers’ weirdly confident delusion that what they’re saying is normal.

I cannot get over the fact that this is ok. It’s mind-boggling and not just because they ran a campaign against “crooked Hillary” who was ripped to shreds for giving speeches and having a family charity. It’s as if they are determined to make us feel as if we’ve lost our minds.

But it appears they’re going to get away this because Donald Trump and his band of extremist weirdos are incompetent in every way that their epic corruption and self-dealing is a secondary story.

.

Can “institutional inertia” save the EPA? by @Gaius_Publius

Can “institutional inertia” save the EPA?

by Gaius Publius

In Trump World, an example of unsound science (source: National Academy of Science)

Is it an emergency yet?

Trump’s plans for changes to and at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been leaked to a site called “Axios” and outlets like New York Magazine are treating the information as viable. We will as well.

From NYMag’s writeup (my emphasis throughout):

Anyone laboring under the impression that the new Trump administration will be all bark and no bite when it comes to overturning long-established bipartisan policies should watch Team Trump’s assault on the Environmental Protection Agency closely. Aside from appointing Scott Pruitt, who is mainly familiar with EPA as a hated adversary in court, to be in charge of that agency, plans for an initial regulatory wave and budgetary policies amount to a 180-degree turn in environmental enforcement, as reported today by Axios. They include the complete elimination of climate-change programs; a half-billion-dollars in funding cuts for EPA grants to state and local governments; an immediate halt to Clean Air Act regulations affecting new and existing power plants; an about-face on auto emissions standards; and a general defanging of EPA’s crucial ability to overrule federal and state regulations that pose environmental dangers.

That’s probably just the beginning, because these plans were formulated by Trump’s EPA transition director, Myron Ebell, mostly famous as a climate-change skeptic, but more generally active as a policy wonk at a very prominent libertarian-ish think tank called the Competitive Enterprise Institute, financed mostly by a rogue’s gallery of fossil-fuel industries and right-wing foundations.

That’s quite a wish-list.

From the Axios article by Jonathan Swan and Mike Allen (bolded emphasis mine):

We got a sneaky look at the Trump transition team’s EPA “agency action” plan. It’s the guiding (aspirational) document written by Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
One of the striking aspects of the document was its language about the agency’s use of scientific research and economic analysis to justify its actions. A section titled ‘Addendum on the problems with EPA science’ leads with this paragraph:

EPA does not use science to guide regulatory policy as much as it uses regulatory policy to steer the science. This is an old problem at EPA. In 1992, a blue-ribbon panel of EPA science advisers that [sic] ‘science should not be adjusted to fit policy.’ But rather than heed this advice, EPA has greatly increased its science manipulation.

The document goes on to recommend what can be done to “improve the use of science by EPA”:

  • EPA should not be funding scientific research
  • If EPA uses scientific data for regulation, that data must be publicly available so independent scientists can review it
  • EPA’s science advisory process needs to be overhauled to eliminate conflicts of interest and inherent bias
  • Science standards need to be developed and implemented to ensure that science policy decisions and epidemiological practices are based on sound science

If you look again at the italicized paragraph (quoted from the leaked document), you can see the Orwellian “up is down” basis for the statements in the bullets, the unsupported assertion that the EPA engages in “science manipulation.” From that “given” follows the rest: The first bulleted item is plain, no more science for you, EPA. The second hinges on the word “independent” (refer again to the quoted paragraph to see what kind of “independence” Trump’s team is looking for). The third turns on the meaning of “inherent bias.” The fourth turns on the meaning of “sound science” (as determined by the Administrator).

One person’s “overhaul” is another person’s “gutting.” Looks like the EPA is headed for a gutting.

Institutional inertia

I asked a person I know who was formerly high up at the EPA, a career civil servant, not a political appointee, about the effect of Pruitt on the EPA. This person advised me that it takes more than 20 months (almost two years) to overturn rulings and programs in an organization as big and complex as the EPA, which oversees laws, regulations and processes that are themselves very complex. I call that slow rate of change “institutional inertia.”

Can institutional inertia save the EPA, at least for a while? We’ll see. The writers at Axios are asking the same question and turned to a “tipster” for some context:

A tipster gives us three important contextual points regarding the executive orders:

  • They may be able to implement some of them administratively, but there will be discomfort amongst some Republicans and it will cost the Administration political capital.
  • It is not a binary process. In other words, they can’t just overturn them, it may take some time if they are already in the process of being implemented and opponents will have legal recourse to challenge some of the actions.
  • There are huge, entrenched bureaucracies at these agencies, and especially at EPA, which is filled with true believers on the environmental movement, climate change, clean water and air. These thousands of people will dig in and make it very difficult for the thin layer of political appointees atop these agencies to move quickly to undo their years of work to put these things in place.

Take the prejudicial description — “true believers” — as showing the tipster to be a climate-denying Republican source. As to people “digging in,” I suspect they’ll do more than that. The “thin layer of political appointees” is very thin indeed, with extremely experienced career employees heading up each of the arms of the huge agency, with nothing but career employees beneath them. Will they revolt by pouring virtual molasses into the already-slow-moving gears of change? We’ll see.

If they do, Trump and Pruitt are likely to respond by developing enemies lists within the organization — civil servants and career employees they want to fire for (trumped up) cause. Or they may do this anyway, proactively. This could very well spark retaliation on the part of the rest of the employees. In other words, war, of a bureaucratic sort.

Stay tuned — as a spectator sport, this should be interesting. And as a spectacle with huge environmental and climate implications, read “interesting” in the sense of the Chinese curse.

Also, watch what happens at NASA and NOAA, agencies also deeply involved — as you’ve seen many times — in both responding to and creating the science around climate change. I’m sure they’re next to be “overhauled,” if that isn’t happening already.

Is it an emergency yet? If it is, what do you suggest we do to prevent it? Don’t despair; humans are resourceful. I’m sure someone will come up with an response.

(A version of this piece appeared at Down With Tyranny. GP article archive here.)

GP

.

Sinclair Lewis is being recognized more and more, I notice by @BloggersRUs

Sinclair Lewis is being recognized more and more, I notice*
by Tom Sullivan

Wasn’t this guy was supposed to be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross?

Think Progress on White House policy advisor, Stephen Miller:

Senior White House Policy Advisor Stephen Miller raised plenty of eyebrows on Sunday as the perused the talk-show circuit talking about cases of voter fraud (that don’t exist) and Steve Bannon’s lack of involvement in drafting executive orders (which, according to most reports, is the exact opposite of the truth).

But perhaps his most alarming statement was in reference to the federal judges in Washington rejecting President Donald Trump’s Muslim ban.

“I think that it’s been an important reminder to all Americans that we have a judiciary that has taken far too much power and become in many cases a supreme branch of government,” Miller told John Dickerson of CBS News, as first noted by Will Saletan of Slate. “The end result of this, though, is that our opponents, the media, and the whole world will soon see, as we begin to take further actions, that the powers of the president to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned.”

Mein Führer! I can walk!

sorry.

We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.

sorry.

Or maybe not:

It’s no wonder Trump likes Miller. Secondhand hearsay is his idea of proof. (In a proper, Trumpish court, that will be enough to convict.) Deliberately implying registration discrepancies are the same as fraudulent votes without having to produce any illegal votes or fraudulent voters is a Machiavellian artifice. It doesn’t matter to members of this White House what the truth is, only what they can get enough people to believe.

To build support for even harsher voting restrictions on American citizens of the wrong persuasion, they need the right kind of people to believe “massive numbers” of the wrong kind of people are “cancelling out the franchise of lawful citizens.” They don’t need no evidence. They don’t have to show you any stinkin’ perpetrators, either. Perhaps this is another reason evangelicals bought into Trump: because he and his people can spew bullshit forcefully and with such supreme confidence.

As Bill McKibben once wrote:

The power of the Christian right rests largely in the fact that they boldly claim religious authority, and by their boldness convince the rest of us that they must know what they’re talking about. They’re like the guy who gives you directions with such loud confidence that you drive on even though the road appears to be turning into a faint, rutted track.

Look straight into the camera and lie through your teeth. Boldly. Do it with enough panache and you will fool some of the people all of the time. At this pace, the Trump White House will be moving up soon to selling prayer cloths and prosperity plans. After all, Trump did that once already with his phony university.

*(Yes, I know.)

Sinking like a stone

Sinking like a stone

by digby
Trump’s Gallup approval rating started out at 45/45 on inauguration day. It’s now 55 disapprove and 40 approve. And it getting worse every single day. There is not a single poll which shows his approval rating rising. 
And weirdly, it doesn’t seem to have anything to do with the economy:
Apparently, people weren’t paying close attention. Because he hasn’t done one unpredictable thing since he took office. This chaotic, racist, incompetent, ignorant administration is exactly as he advertised it would be.
.

QOTW: Scott Pelley

QOTW: Scott Pelley

by digby

On Monday night he led the CBS Evening News with this:

Today President Trump told a U.S. military audience there gave been terrorist attacks that no one knows about because the media choose not to report them.

It has been a busy day for presidential statements divorced from reality.

Mr. Trump said this morning that any polls, that show disapproval of his immigration ban are fake.

He singled out a federal judge for ridicule after the judge suspended his ban and Mr. Trump said that the ruling now means that anyone can enter the country.

The President’s fictitious claims whether imaginary or fabricated are now worrying even his backers, particularly after he insisted that millions of people voted illegally giving Hillary Clinton her popular vote victory. There’s not one state election official—Democrat or Republican—who supports that claim.

What else can they do? He is divorced from reality. At this point the most important thing is to keep pointing out that the emperor has no clothes.

.