Skip to content

Month: February 2017

Who’s Bannon’s daddy?

Who’s Bannon’s daddy?

by digby

It just goes to show you how uneducated I am about these things, but I had never heard of this philosopher before I read this chilling long read in the New York Times.

Those trying to divine the roots of Stephen K. Bannon’s dark and at times apocalyptic worldview have repeatedly combed over a speech that Mr. Bannon, President Trump’s ideological guru, made in 2014 to a Vatican conference, where he expounded on Islam, populism and capitalism.

But for all the examination of those remarks, a passing reference by Mr. Bannon to an esoteric Italian philosopher has gone little noticed, except perhaps by scholars and followers of the deeply taboo, Nazi-affiliated thinker, Julius Evola.

“The fact that Bannon even knows Evola is significant,” said Mark Sedgwick, a leading scholar of Traditionalists at Aarhus University in Denmark.

Evola, who died in 1974, wrote on everything from Eastern religions to the metaphysics of sex to alchemy. But he is best known as a leading proponent of Traditionalism, a worldview popular in far-right and alternative religious circles that believes progress and equality are poisonous illusions.

Evola became a darling of Italian Fascists, and Italy’s post-Fascist terrorists of the 1960s and 1970s looked to him as a spiritual and intellectual godfather.

They called themselves Children of the Sun after Evola’s vision of a bourgeoisie-smashing new order that he called the Solar Civilization. Today, the Greek neo-Nazi party Golden Dawn includes his works on its suggested reading list, and the leader of Jobbik, the Hungarian nationalist party, admires Evola and wrote an introduction to his works.

More important for the current American administration, Evola also caught on in the United States with leaders of the alt-right movement, which Mr. Bannon nurtured as the head of Breitbart News and then helped harness for Mr. Trump.

[…]

“When I started working on Evola, you had to plow through Italian,” said Mr. Sedgwick, who keeps track of Traditionalist movements and thought on his blog, Traditionalists. “Now he’s available in English, German, Russian, Serbian, Greek, Hungarian. First I saw Evola boom, and then I realized the number of people interested in that sort of idea was booming.”

Born in 1898, Evola liked to call himself a baron and in later life sported a monocle in his left eye.

A brilliant student and talented artist, he came home after fighting in World War I and became a leading exponent in Italy of the Dada movement, which, like Evola, rejected the church and bourgeois institutions.

Evola’s early artistic endeavors gave way to his love of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and he developed a worldview with an overriding animosity toward the decadence of modernity. Influenced by mystical works and the occult, Evola began developing an idea of the individual’s ability to transcend his reality and “be unconditionally whatever one wants.”

Under the influence of René Guénon, a French metaphysicist and convert to Islam, Evola in 1934 published his most influential work, “The Revolt Against the Modern World,” which cast materialism as an eroding influence on ancient values.

It viewed humanism, the Renaissance, the Protestant Reformation and the French Revolution all as historical disasters that took man further away from a transcendental perennial truth.

Changing the system, Evola argued, was “not a question of contesting and polemicizing, but of blowing everything up.”

Evola’s ideal order, Professor Drake wrote, was based on “hierarchy, caste, monarchy, race, myth, religion and ritual.”

That made a fan out of Benito Mussolini.

The dictator already admired Evola’s early writings on race, which influenced the 1938 Racial Laws restricting the rights of Jews in Italy.

Mussolini so liked Evola’s 1941 book, “Synthesis on the Doctrine of Race,” which advocated a form of spiritual, and not merely biological, racism, that he invited Evola to meet him in September of that year.

Evola eventually broke with Mussolini and the Italian Fascists because he considered them overly tame and corrupted by compromise. Instead he preferred the Nazi SS officers, seeing in them something closer to a mythic ideal. They also shared his anti-Semitism.

A demonstration last month by Golden Dawn, the Greek neo-Nazi party, which includes Evola’s works on a suggested reading list. Michalis Karagiannis/Reuters
Mr. Bannon suggested in his Vatican remarks that the Fascist movement had come out of Evola’s ideas.

As Mr. Bannon expounded on the intellectual motivations of the Russian president, Vladimir V. Putin, he mentioned “Julius Evola and different writers of the early 20th century who are really the supporters of what’s called the Traditionalist movement, which really eventually metastasized into Italian Fascism.”

The reality, historians say, is that Evola sought to “infiltrate and influence” the Fascists, as Mr. Sedgwick put it, as a powerful vehicle to spread his ideas.

In his Vatican talk, Mr. Bannon suggested that although Mr. Putin represented a “kleptocracy,” the Russian president understood the existential danger posed by “a potential new caliphate” and the importance of using nationalism to stand up for traditional institutions.

“We, the Judeo-Christian West,” Mr. Bannon added, “really have to look at what he’s talking about as far as Traditionalism goes — particularly the sense of where it supports the underpinnings of nationalism.”

As Mr. Bannon suggested in his speech, Mr. Putin’s most influential thinker is Aleksandr Dugin, the ultranationalist Russian Traditionalist and anti-liberal writer sometimes called “Putin’s Rasputin.”

An intellectual descendant of Evola, Mr. Dugin has called for a “genuine, true, radically revolutionary, and consistent fascist fascism” and advocated a geography-based theory of “Eurasianism” — which has provided a philosophical framework for Mr. Putin’s expansionism and meddling in Western European politics.

Mr. Dugin sees European Traditionalists as needing Russia, and Mr. Putin, to defend them from the onslaught of Western liberal democracy, individual liberty, and materialism — all Evolian bête noirs.

This appeal of traditional values on populist voters and against out-of-touch elites, the “Pan-European Union” and “centralized government in the United States,” as Mr. Bannon put it, was not lost on Mr. Trump’s ideological guru.

“A lot of people that are Traditionalists,” he said in his Vatican remarks, “are attracted to that.”

It is a most fascinating tale and I highly recommend you read it to get a sense of the intellectual influences of Trump’s most trusted consiglieri. It’s obvious that Bannon sees Trump as a useful tool — Trump hasn’t even read a comic book since his teens, obviously. But Bannon has a developed worldview and when you dig beneath the surface of the “nationalism” and the “anti-globalism” and the more “modern “alt-right” nomenclature, Bannon is a fascist, the real deal.His influences aren’t limited to this philosopher, but they all seem to be found on the same deplorable shelf in the bookstore.

It’s considered hyperbolic to say that, I know. Trump hasn’t opened any camps yet. But the Third Reich wasn’t built in a day and Trump’s Great America won’t be either. It happens slowly at first and then all at once.

Americans thought they were voting for a reality show star and assumed this was all going to be good fun sticking it to the hates liberal elite and the “welfare queens” who vote for them. They weren’t thinking in these terms, not even the more homespun American “traditionalists” who are cut from a different cloth altogether. It may not end up being as much fun for them as they thought.

.

Precious bodily fluids by @BloggersRUs

Precious bodily fluids
by Tom Sullivan

A certain occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue stunned a roomful of senators into silence at a Thursday meeting called to discuss his nominee for the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch. Also present at the White House meeting, reports Politico, was former New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte who lost her reelection bid in November. She now works for said occupant as a Capitol Hill liaison. It didn’t take long for president 45 to launch into yet another tale of stolen elections:

The president claimed that he and Ayotte both would have been victorious in the Granite State if not for the “thousands” of people who were “brought in on buses” from neighboring Massachusetts to “illegally” vote in New Hampshire.

According to one participant who described the meeting, “an uncomfortable silence” momentarily overtook the room.

One imagines they had that look Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake (Peter Sellers) had in Dr. Strangelove when Brig. Gen. Jack D. Ripper (Sterling Hayden) started talking about fluoridation and his precious bodily fluids.

I know it’s the weekend, but here’s a little back-of-the-napkin math for a Saturday morning. If we take “thousands” to mean 3,000 (at a minimum, and just above the Republican presidential candidate’s margin of defeat), then at 50 passengers per bus, that’s 60 buses. That’s quite a fleet of buses no one noticed rolling into New Hampshire hamlets on the busiest news day of the year.

Using 1995 technology, it took the FBI no time at all to trace a single Ryder truck scattered across blocks of Oklahoma City to renter/bomber Timothy McVeigh. It ought to be a cinch for the confident occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to track down who rented 60 (or more) buses in Massachusetts to shuttle thousands of “illegals” into New Hampshire to vote on November 8. You think?

Then again, we live in a universe governed by Newton’s laws, laws of evidence, and evidence-based science, not in the fifth dimension, “the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition.”

I’m in Raleigh, North Carolina this morning where by the time this post goes live real thousands will be arriving on real buses for the 11th Annual Moral March on Raleigh & HKonJ People’s Assembly. Maybe for the president’s benefit I’ll post pictures of what real buses and real thousands look like.

Update:

This is what thousands look like:

Friday night Soother Redux

Friday Night Soother

by digby

I’m reprising this even though I accidentally posted it too soon yesterday… doh. Animal welfare is an issue that’s important to me and the fact that these insane Trumpites are even so cruel that they are evidently planning to roll back protection regulations is enough to make me sick.

But first, a river otter in the snow, to make you smile:

And now a little animal welfare politics. Because it’s important:

Ever since animal welfare reports — which have been easily available to the public for a decade — were suddenly scrubbed from a government website last Friday, people who love animals have been speaking out.

The reports, which were housed on the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) site, included details about animal abuse and suffering at puppy mills, circuses, zoos, laboratories, farms and even SeaWorld. Since they were removed, it’s become much harder for the public to be informed about which facilities are good and which are bad for animals.

“All information was removed today. This includes inspection reports for breeders, exhibitors and research facilities,” Tanya Espinosa, public affairs specialist for legislative and public affairs at USDA-APHIS, told The Dodo on Friday.

The unofficial Twitter account for the USDA — one of many alternative accounts that arose after the federal government started restricting what information government agencies could tell the public — encouraged people on Thursday to speak up for the sake of transparency, using adorable photos of their pets.

Meanwhile, as concerned citizens are speaking out, animal welfare organizations are making plans to take legal action against the USDA to make the information freely available again.

“This appears to be a situation of agency capture with the USDA cowering to special interests to the detriment of transparency and animal welfare,” Nancy Perry, senior vice president of government relations for the ASPCA, told The Dodo. “This is public information and subject to FOIA, so it’s dumbfounding that the USDA would take action to make this information more difficult to access. We are deeply concerned this is an effort to protect those who are doing harm to animals.”

More here.

Do we have to fight these people on absolutely everything? 

I mean, even Hitler liked animals.

.

Poor Jason Chaffetz suddenly discovers his hands are tied

Poor Jason Chaffetz suddenly discovers his hands are tied

by digby

If there’s ever been a more unctuous, sanctimonious, self-serving piece of work than Utah congressman Jason Chaffetz, I’ve never seen him. After all of his rending of garments over Hillary Clinton’s supposed corruption, including his nasty promise at the inauguration to keep investigating her, he’s decided that nothing Trump does can be called corrupt so it’s off the table.

His constituents aren’t happy about it:

Chaffetz has come under fire for taking few actions against either Donald Trump’s international business empire and the potential conflicts-of-interest it creates, or pushing Trump to release his tax returns. As the chair of the committee tasked with investigating “waste, fraud, and abuse” in the federal government, Chaffetz is perhaps the government official with the most power to check Trump’s unprecedented potential to leverage the White House for private gain.

But so far, Chaffetz has issued no subpoenas, called for no hearings, and scheduled no meetings to investigate Trump’s either potential abuse of the office. (He has asked the General Services Administration for documents related to Trump’s hotel in DC, and on Thursday called Kellyanne Conway “wrong, wrong, wrong” for publicly endorsing Ivanka Trump’s label.) Critics have pointed out that Chaffetz was relentless in his investigation of the executive branch during President Obama’s administration, particularly over Hillary Clinton’s role in the Benghazi scandal.

It looks like the more than 1,000 people who showed up at the Brighton High School Thursday night want him to do more. Videos show attendees demanding Chaffetz explain his “line in the sand” for Trump and loudly booing Chaffetz for saying he doesn’t believe Trump should release his tax returns:

One assumes that Chaffetz would find a way to investigate if the subject were Hillary Clinton.

Read more about it here. His constituents are fired up.

And he’s still an oily creep:

“I’ll remind people that I never did a quote-unquote ‘investigation’ of Barack Obama when he was president,” Chaffetz told me. “I am personally not diving into the individual roles of the family members. I haven’t done that with President Obama, and I have not done that with Donald Trump.”

Right. Sasha and Malia attending meetings with foreign dignitaries whose governments were in the midst of making deals for their lemonade stand brand. This is fatuous bullshit even for him. Particularly since he stated in advance of the possible Clinton administration that she presented a “target rich environment” and he planned to dog her day in and day out over emails and assorted nonsensical corruption charges.

He is the worst, the bottom of the barrel. But when you see the footage of him at that meeting you can see he’s actually enjoying the attention even though it’s hostile. That’s all he cares about.

Chaffetz 2024? You betcha.

.

Flynn in trouble

Flynn in trouble

by digby

It looks like the White House is circling the wagons to protect Pence for going out and defending Michael Flynn on those Russian phone calls. It turns out Flynn did tell the Russians not to worry about the sanctions over their interference in the election. That strikes me as kind of a quid pro quo but what do I know?

“Hey, thanks for helping us get elected! Don’t worry we’ll make sure you don’t pay any price for doing what you did! Nostrovia!”

I don’t think Pence should be let off the hook.There has been a ton of evidence of strange shennanigans between Flynn and Russia (not to mention Trump) and he chose to ignore them. Either that or he knew and lied. Considering the habits of this administration, assuming dishonesty should be the default assumption.

Nonetheless, it does look like the knives are out for Flynn. But that’s been evident for a while. I wrote about it a couple of weeks ago:

This raises the question of what happened to Michael Flynn, the crazed alt-right general who was supposed to be Trump’s versions of Patton, MacArthur and “Black Jack” Pershing all rolled into one. Glenn Thrush and Maggie Haberman of The New York Times have the scoop on that: It looks as though he has seriously lost favor.

Flynn was a favorite of Trump’s when the retired general was heaping contempt upon Hillary Clinton, but Flynn evidently hasn’t worn well with the boss since he vanquished her. Sources tell the Times that Flynn is seen as talking too much and his Pizzagate-enabling son has been a thorn in the administration’s side. There are also whispers about Flynn’s being too close to certain fringe characters, which is true but also profoundly self-serving since Bannon and Trump himself are closely tied to the same elements. According to the Times’ juicy dish, Rex Tillerson, Jim Mattis and Mike Pompeo convened a meeting this week and didn’t invite Flynn — because he was the subject of discussion. The claws are definitely out.

This may be the most encouraging bit of news we’ve had since Trump was inaugurated. Sessions and his crew are scary ideologues. Bannon is a frighteningly adept propagandist with a dangerous worldview. Mike Pence and Paul Ryan are far-right conservative movement zealots with a blank check. Trump himself is unfit and way over his head, and the whole administration is incompetent on every level. But Flynn seems to be certifiably unhinged, even by the standards of this unbalanced crew. If the Trump administration is looking for ways to ease him out, thank goodness for small favors. One less kook in a White House full of them is a baby step in the right direction.

Trump really likes him and that’s the problem. And they both share an inexplicable special affinity for Russia, which may or may not have anything to do with policy. So, who knows? But the fact is that Flynn is a true Strangelovian freak and since the president is one as well, it would be helpful to get rid of him even if it doesn’t solve the larger problem. One less madman in the White House would be welcome.

.

What is this kabuki dance you speak of?

What is this kabuki dance you speak of?

by digby

And I’m not talking about Trump’s meeting with the Japanese Jrime Minister today …

I was rolling my eyes the other day about this Gorsuch flap because it was so obvious that they were trying to give some red state Democrats room to vote for him or at least help block a filibuster. I noted that Mitch McConnell knows very well how to get a right wing judge confirmed. They are all very good at this kabuki dance.

Here’s the New York Times explaining it:

Veterans of the Supreme Court confirmation process note that the ritual of private meetings with senators is almost completely staged for minimum controversy and maximum impact, with questions discussed in advance, answers honed and rehearsed, and no remark made unless it is intended to withstand public scrutiny.

“You don’t want any surprises, so there’s nothing that you don’t prepare for going into a meeting,” said Stephanie Cutter, a top Obama administration official who shepherded the nomination of Justice Sonia Sotomayor. “They knew this question would be coming, and they would have practiced an answer, and this was what he planned to say.”

Ms. Cutter recalled preparing Justice Sotomayor for a meeting with Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, then the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, in which she worked to explain her remarks that that a “wise Latina woman” could reach a “better” decision than a white man. Mr. Leahy left the meeting and promptly repeated the explanation to the assembled reporters, an effort to dispense with the issue before she came before the Senate for confirmation hearings.

“This might have been an attempt to make him look more independent,” Ms. Cutter said of Judge Gorsuch. “He could have created a story line about standing up to Trump.”

Of course it was. The problem is that Trump won’t have anyone, not even a winking and nodding Supreme Court nominee, publicly express the intention to stand up to him. He just can’t do it. So, it didn’t go down as planned:

White House officials insisted on Thursday that Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, was not referring to Mr. Trump’s recent denigration of judges when he said privately that he was disheartened by attacks on the courts.

Mr. Trump said on Twitter that the nominee’s remarks had been misrepresented, a sentiment echoed by the White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, during a contentious briefing. A day before, members of the White House team guiding Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation verified that the judge had expressed his dismay in response to questions about Mr. Trump’s insults of judges.

The administration’s abrupt shift highlighted the degree to which Judge Gorsuch’s nomination — a top priority for the president and his core supporters — has become mired in a broader debate over Mr. Trump’s attitude about the constitutional principle of judicial independence.

The president’s feud with the judiciary — he referred to the district court judge who blocked his targeted travel ban as a “so-called judge” and called an appeals court hearing “a disgrace” — is dominating the Senate’s consideration of Judge Gorsuch’s nomination. Senators from both parties are demanding that the judge answer for the president who named him.

Mr. Spicer said that when Judge Gorsuch told senators that he considered such criticism “demoralizing” and “disheartening,” he was referring broadly to any such attacks on the judiciary.

“The judge was very clear that he was not commenting on any specific matter, and that he was asked about his general philosophy,” Mr. Spicer told reporters during a series of testy exchanges. “So you can’t then take that and equate it back to the specific. He literally went out of his way to say I’m not commenting on a specific instance.”

Here’s how the Democrats responded:

“We take Sean Spicer at his word that Judge Gorsuch did not mean to distance himself from Donald Trump’s attacks on the judicial branch,” Zac Petkanas, a senior adviser for the Democratic National Committee, said in a statement. Mr. Petkanas called it proof that the nominee “will be nothing more than a rubber stamp for this out-of-control Trump presidency.”

They literally cannot do anything right.

.

It was always obvious he was dumb as a rock

It was always obvious he was dumb as a rock

by digby

But people chose to see that as some kind of act because he’s rich. There are lots of dumb rich people, especially the ones who inherited their money and then their money made them richer.

Trump is a brand — like Jessica Simpson. And I suspect she’s actually smarter.

Anyway, the chickens are coming home to roost. And they’re freaking out.

Being president is harder than Donald Trump thought, according to aides and allies who say that he’s growing increasingly frustrated with the challenges of running the massive federal bureaucracy.

In interviews, nearly two dozen people who’ve spent time with Trump in the three weeks since his inauguration said that his mood has careened between surprise and anger as he’s faced the predictable realities of governing, from congressional delays over his cabinet nominations and legal fights holding up his aggressive initiatives to staff in-fighting and leaks.

The administration’s rocky opening days have been a setback for a president who, as a billionaire businessman, sold himself to voters as being uniquely qualified to fix what ailed the nation. Yet it has become apparent, say those close to the president, most of whom requested anonymity to describe the inner workings of the White House, that the transition from overseeing a family business to running the country has been tough on him.

Trump often asks simple questions about policies, proposals and personnel. And, when discussions get bogged down in details, the president has been known to quickly change the subject — to “seem in control at all times,” one senior government official said — or direct questions about details to his chief strategist Steve Bannon, his son-in-law Jared Kushner or House Speaker Paul Ryan. Trump has privately expressed disbelief over the ability of judges, bureaucrats or lawmakers to delay — or even stop — him from filling positions and implementing policies.

After Trump grew infuriated by disclosures of his confrontational phone calls with foreign leaders, an investigation was launched into the source of the leaks, according to one White House aide. National Security Council staffers have been instructed to cooperate with inquiries, including requests to inspect their electronic communications, said two sources familiar with the situation. It’s not clear whether the investigation is a formal proceeding, how far along it is or who is conducting it.

The administration is considering limiting the universe of aides with access to the calls or their transcripts, said one administration official, adding that the leaks — and Trump’s anger over them — had created a climate where people are “very careful who they talk to.”

The president and his allies believe career NSC staff assigned from other agencies are out to get them. In turn, some NSC staff believe Trump does not possess the capacity for detail and nuance required to handle the sensitive issues discussed on the calls, and that he has politicized their agency by appointing chief strategist Bannon to the council.

Last week, Trump told an associate he had become weary of in-fighting among — and leaks from — his White House staff “because it reflects on me,” and that he intended to sit down staffers to tell them “to cut this shit out.”

He also became aggravated after learning about complications surrounding his appointment of one of his top fundraisers, Anthony Scaramucci, to a plum White House job, which Trump blamed on internal jockeying between aides, according to one person with knowledge of the situation.

Trump “was furious,” this person said. “He doesn’t like this shit.”

The White House press office did not respond to a series of detailed questions about the way the president has coped with leaks, in-fighting and setbacks.

Christopher Ruddy, a Trump friend and the chief executive of the conservative Newsmax Media, said “Running the federal government is something new for him, for sure.” But, Ruddy added, “I think if he’s demonstrated anything in his life, he is a very fast learner and adapts very quickly. The man is not to be underestimated.”

For all his frustrations, Trump has reveled in the trappings of the presidency. He has taken a liking to the Oval Office, where he spends much of his time working. Following a recent gathering of business leaders, he brought the group into the storied room and showed them around.

But he has also sought refuge from the pressures of the presidency, frequently calling up old friends and sounding them out about golf.

Trump aides joke that they wish their boss would spend more time at his Mar-A-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Fla., where they say the president appears more relaxed and at ease. He dispensed hugs and kisses to female guests attending a Red Cross ball at the estate last week, and is scheduled to return this weekend for a round of golf with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

Most of those interviewed for this story requested anonymity to describe the inner workings of a White House where they say the tension has been intensified by the president’s propensity for knee-jerk micromanaging when faced with disappointment, and jockeying among aides to avoid blame or claim credit when possible.

The interviews paint a picture of a powder-keg of a workplace where job duties are unclear, morale among some is low, factionalism is rampant and exhaustion is running high. Two visitors to the White House last week said they were struck by how tired the staff looks.

Why anyone thought it would be any different under this dim-witted, puerile braggart I will never understand. I get that his TV addicted voters just bought his TV persona as a brilliant businessman and assumed he had magical abilities to “get things done” and just say “you’re fired” if “the government” failed to do exactly what he said. They believe a lot of silly things and they are brainwashed by right wing media.

It’s the rest of the Republicans who have something to answer for. There were those who noticed that the Emperor was not only naked, he was stupid and mentally unstable. They were treated like dogs by Trump’s shock troops and many of the them backed down. But there were far fewer of these than there should have been.

Now we have this. And the extent to which people are leaking is astonishing. It must be very, very bad.

.

The heat is on by @BloggersRUs

The heat is on
by Tom Sullivan

Being president is not like being a billionaire patrician. Donald Trump is accustomed to lots of bowing and scraping and sucking up from eager sycophants and contractors. But outside his White House and Republican political circles, he’s not seeing as much of that as president. He hasn’t even had a “honeymoon.” Last night in San Francisco, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the temporary restraining order on his travel ban from seven Muslim countries. The decision was unanimous:

The three-judge panel, suggesting that the ban did not advance national security, said the administration had shown “no evidence” that anyone from the seven nations — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — had committed terrorist acts in the United States.

The ruling also rejected Mr. Trump’s claim that courts are powerless to review a president’s national security assessments. Judges have a crucial role to play in a constitutional democracy, the court said.

“It is beyond question,” the decision said, “that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action.”

Last night’s decision is likely to wind up before the evenly divided U.S. Supreme Court before Trump’s nominee, Neil Gorsuch, can be confirmed by the Senate. But even a 5-4 conservative court is not going to relinquish its authority to review executive branch decisions.

Democrats in the U.S. House are applying heat to Trump’s business dealings by deploying a seldom-used procedure:

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) filed a “resolution of inquiry” Thursday, a relatively obscure parliamentary tactic used to force presidents and executive-branch agencies to share records with Congress. Under House practice, such a resolution must be debated and acted upon in committee or else it can be discharged to the House floor for consideration.

Nadler’s resolution asks Attorney General Jeff Sessions to provide “copies of any document, record, memo, correspondence, or other communication of the Department of Justice” that pertains to any “criminal or counterintelligence investigation” into Trump, his White House team or certain campaign associates; any investment made by a foreign power or agent thereof in Trump’s businesses; Trump’s plans to distance himself from his business empire; and any Trump-related examination of federal conflict of interest laws or the emoluments clause of the Constitution.

Nader’s move has an ice cube’s chance in hell of making it to a floor vote, but he’s getting press for it and making sure the issue doesn’t fade from public view.

So far, Trump is finding out it’s not easy being king in a democracy (a republic, Republican friends are quick to correct).

Outside the capitol, the strengthening opposition to the Trump administration has taken a few pages from the T-party playbook. Trump’s opponents have taken to showing up en masse at town hall events held in congressional districts:

Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz was home in his district Thursday night to hold a town hall at a high school in the suburbs of Salt Lake City. It did not go well. The crowd well exceeded the auditorium’s 1,000-person capacity and the event kicked off to chants of “kick him out!” (re: Chaffetz) mixed with “let them in!” (re: the some 1,000 person overflow crowd locked out of the event).

Several video clips at the Slate link.

For a bit of contrast, let’s look at who is not feeling any of the heat going around: business. U.S. New & World Report:

CNBC obtained a memo that suggests Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas – the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee who has championed the regulation-stripping Financial Choice Act on Capitol Hill – is backing new legislation that would further peel back Dodd-Frank regulatory layers by taking particular aim at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The new bill in question reportedly would limit the bureau’s ability to police the private sector and scrap its consumer complaint databases. It also would change the structure of the agency’s directorship – making it an appointed position open to at-will termination.

In Washington, a lot of politicians are all about protecting the little people from terrorists and big gummint. But from businessmen? Not so much. When you view the economic world through Darwin-colored glasses, you dislike checks on apex predators as much as the Trump administration dislikes checks on lies, torture and profiting from government service.

Friday Night Soother

Pre-Friday Night Soother

by digby

For all you snowbound east coasters, here’s a little guy having some fun with it:

And now a little animal welfare politics. Because it’s important:

Ever since animal welfare reports — which have been easily available to the public for a decade — were suddenly scrubbed from a government website last Friday, people who love animals have been speaking out.

The reports, which were housed on the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) site, included details about animal abuse and suffering at puppy mills, circuses, zoos, laboratories, farms and even SeaWorld. Since they were removed, it’s become much harder for the public to be informed about which facilities are good and which are bad for animals.

“All information was removed today. This includes inspection reports for breeders, exhibitors and research facilities,” Tanya Espinosa, public affairs specialist for legislative and public affairs at USDA-APHIS, told The Dodo on Friday.

The unofficial Twitter account for the USDA — one of many alternative accounts that arose after the federal government started restricting what information government agencies could tell the public — encouraged people on Thursday to speak up for the sake of transparency, using adorable photos of their pets.

Meanwhile, as concerned citizens are speaking out, animal welfare organizations are making plans to take legal action against the USDA to make the information freely available again.

“This appears to be a situation of agency capture with the USDA cowering to special interests to the detriment of transparency and animal welfare,” Nancy Perry, senior vice president of government relations for the ASPCA, told The Dodo. “This is public information and subject to FOIA, so it’s dumbfounding that the USDA would take action to make this information more difficult to access. We are deeply concerned this is an effort to protect those who are doing harm to animals.”

More here.

Do we have to fight these people on absolutely everything? 


I mean, even Hitler liked animals.


.

Making America Great Again, one pointlessly cruel act at a time

Making America Great Again, one pointlessly cruel act at a time

by digby

Real Americans protecting our way of life

And so it begins:

For eight years, Guadalupe García de Rayos had checked in at the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement office here, a requirement since she was caught using a fake Social Security number during a raid in 2008 at a water park where she worked.

Every year since then, she has walked in and out of the meetings after a brief review of her case and some questions.

But not this year.

On Wednesday, immigration agents arrested Ms. Rayos, 35, and began procedures to send her back to Mexico, a country she has not seen since she left it 21 years ago.

As a van carrying Ms. Rayos left the ICE building, protesters were waiting. They surrounded it, chanting, “Liberation, not deportation.” Her daughter, Jacqueline, joined in, holding a sign that read, “Not one more deportation.” One man, Manuel Saldana, tied himself to one of the van’s front wheels and said, “I’m going to stay here as long as it takes.”

Soon, police officers in helmets had surrounded Mr. Saldana. They cut off the ties holding him to the tire and rounded up at least six others who were blocking the front and back of the van, arresting them all. The driver quickly put the van in reverse and rolled back into the building.

Ms. Rayos was one of several detainees inside the van. It was unclear whether officials planned to take them to Mexico or to detention.

By midnight on Thursday, her husband said he was not sure where she was. A vehicle had just left the building under police escort, and he said he suspected she may have been inside.

Ms. Rayos was arrested just days after the Trump administration broadened the definition of “criminal alien,” a move that immigrants’ rights advocates say could easily apply to a majority of undocumented immigrants in the United States.

“We’re living in a new era now, an era of war on immigrants,” Ms. Rayos’s lawyer, Ray A. Ybarra Maldonado, said Wednesday after leaving the building here that houses the federal immigration agency, known by its acronym, ICE.

The Obama administration made a priority of deporting people who were deemed a threat to public or national safety, had ties to criminal gangs, or had committed serious felony offenses or a series of misdemeanor crimes. Ms. Rayos did not fit any of these criteria, which is why she was allowed to stay in the United States even after a judge issued a deportation order against her in 2013.

That all changed under Mr. Trump. Among the 18 executive orders that he has issued since taking office on Jan. 20 is one stipulating that undocumented immigrants convicted of any criminal offense — and even those who have not been charged but are believed to have committed “acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense” — have become a priority for deportation.

[…]

Lawyers from two of the nation’s leading civil rights’ groups said Ms. Rayos might be the first undocumented immigrant to be arrested during a scheduled meeting with immigration officials since Mr. Trump took office. Thousands of others run a similar risk when they report for their regular immigration checks, in large part because federal agents are now free to decide who is and is not a threat to public safety, those advocates said.

“That is precisely what the alarming problem is with Trump’s internal enforcement order,” Cecillia Wang, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said in an interview on Wednesday. Mr. Trump, she said, “took the gloves off agents and has permitted these agents to go after immigrants regardless of their ties and contributions to the United States.”

Ms. Rayos was 14 when she left Acambaro, a city in an impoverished corner of the Mexican state of Guanajuato, and sneaked across the border into Nogales, Ariz., a three-hour drive from Phoenix. She married — her husband is also undocumented — and gave birth to a boy and a girl, who are now in their teens.

Before showing up for her appointment with the immigration officials on Wednesday morning, Ms. Rayos and her family attended Mass. Later, as she entered the gates into the ICE building, she stopped for a moment, clasped her hands and bowed her head, as if she was reciting a silent prayer.

“The only crime my mother committed was to go to work to give a better life for her children,” said her daughter, Jacqueline, as Ms. Rayos stood by her side before entering the ICE building with her lawyer.

Ms. Rayos was working at Golfland Sunsplash in Mesa, a suburb of Phoenix, when Maricopa County sheriff’s deputies swooped in on Dec. 16, 2008, arresting her and several other employees on charges of suspicion of identity theft and using forged documents to obtain employment. The raid was one of the first ordered by Joe Arpaio, who was sheriff at the time, under an Arizona law authorizing sanctions against employers who knowingly hired undocumented immigrants.

She spent three months in a county jail, followed by three months in immigration detention, she told a reporter. In 2013, an immigration court ordered that she be sent back to Mexico, but her case had been on hold since the federal authorities — under the Obama administration — decided not to act on the deportation order.

Her son, Angel, still remembers the evening of her arrest — the knock on the door, the flashlight on the darkened living room, the sight of handcuffs on his mother’s wrists.

“I was in second grade,” he said. “I never forgot that night, and I’ve lived in fear of losing my mother every night since then.”

I hope all those fine Real Americans are proud of themselves. I hope they feel good about what they’ve done. Maybe they can go to church this Sunday and thank their God for giving them Donald Trump to Make America Great Again. If their beliefs are true, they will go to hell, but apparently they’re just happy for the opportunity to treat someone cruelly and be praised for it, so it’s a consequence they’ll live with.

.