Skip to content

Month: May 2017

QOTD: Trump

QOTD: Trump

by digby

“The fertile region – and it is SO fertile…”

That’s from his speech which the press seems to have found to be quite impressive:

He gave a speech that sounded like someone from a different administration wrote it. He does that. He’s often very nice to people’s faces and then rips into them before a different audience. I’d guess everyone knows this by now.

He’s making a lot of arms deals overseas and evidently they’re working hard to get these customers a break in the price. He says this will create jobs, jobs, jobs.

So there’s that.

.

Post-post-racial America by @BloggersRUs

Post-post-racial America
by Tom Sullivan

It’s hard not being near the top of the political food chain. It’s tough being white, proud, and so easily threatened by this:


Photograph by Martin Schoeller from National Geographic, October 2013.

As has been increasingly obvious, “Racial attitudes made a bigger difference in electing Trump than authoritarianism.” Part of that is the sense that growing ethnic and racial diversity is a threat to white supremacy and status. Not necessarily in the Klan sense, but in the societal privilege sense. “When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression”:

All this anger we see from people screaming “All Lives Matter” in response to black protesters at rallies. All this anger we see from people insisting that their “religious freedom” is being infringed because a gay couple wants to get married. All these people angry about immigrants, angry about Muslims, angry about “Happy Holidays,” angry about not being able to say bigoted things without being called a bigot…

A poll last week indicates nationwide attitudes are definitely shifting, just ever so slowly. Like when they threw the wheel on the Titanic hard over and she kept heading straight for the iceberg for what seemed like minutes before beginning to turn.

Pew Research reported last week:

In 2015, 17% of all U.S. newlyweds had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, marking more than a fivefold increase since 1967, when 3% of newlyweds were intermarried, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data.2 In that year, the U.S. Supreme Court in the Loving v. Virginia case ruled that marriage across racial lines was legal throughout the country. Until this ruling, interracial marriages were forbidden in many states.

More broadly, one-in-ten married people in 2015 – not just those who recently married – had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. This translates into 11 million people who were intermarried. The growth in intermarriage has coincided with shifting societal norms as Americans have become more accepting of marriages involving spouses of different races and ethnicities, even within their own families.

The most dramatic increases in intermarriage have occurred among black newlyweds. Since 1980, the share who married someone of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled from 5% to 18%. White newlyweds, too, have experienced a rapid increase in intermarriage, with rates rising from 4% to 11%. However, despite this increase, they remain the least likely of all major racial or ethnic groups to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity.

Furthermore (pg. 7):

The decline in opposition to intermarriage in the longer term has been even more dramatic, a new Pew Research Center analysis of data from the General Social Survey has found. In 1990, 63% of nonblack adults surveyed said they would be very or somewhat opposed to a close relative marrying a black person; today the figure stands at 14%. Opposition to a close relative entering into an intermarriage with a spouse who is Hispanic or Asian has also declined markedly since 2000, when data regarding those groups first became available. The share of nonwhites saying they would oppose having a family member marry a white person has edged downward as well.

Stormfront commenters were less sanguine about what that meant. One wrote,”… it just seems America is officially over. This WILL be a complete third world nation within thirty years. Absolutely finished.” Strange, because when Obama became president and the T-party rose up, Ann Coulter declared “we don’t have racism in America any more” like it was a good thing. Despite Pat Buchanan lamenting “The End of White America,” in Shelby v. Holder, Chief Justice John Roberts declared. “Our country has changed.”

Ask black voters in North Carolina how much.

After calling for President Trump’s impeachment, U.S. Rep. Al Green of Texas received racially tinged threats. He played a few voice mails for a town hall meeting Saturday:

The seven-term Democrat told the crowd of about 100 people that he won’t be deterred.

“We are not going to be intimidated,” Green said Saturday. “We are not going to allow this to cause us to deviate from what we believe to be the right thing to do and that is to proceed with the impeachment of President Trump.”

One male caller used a racial insult and threatened Green with “hanging from a tree” if he pursues impeachment. Another man left a message saying Green would be the one impeached after “a short trial” and then he would be hanged, according to the recording.

Green took to the House floor on Wednesday to say he believes Trump committed obstruction of justice and no one’s above the law.

The good news is their numbers are shrinking, but as Jesus said, bigots you have with you always. Or something.

SIFF-ting through cinema, Pt. 1 by Dennis Hartley: Seattle International Film Festival — 11 reviews!

Saturday Night at the Movies

SIFF-ting through cinema, Pt. 1

By Dennis Hartley

The Seattle International Film Festival kicked off May 18, so over the next several posts I’ll be sharing highlights. SIFF is showing 400 films over 25 days. Navigating such an event is no easy task, even for a dedicated buff. Yet, I trudge on (cue the world’s tiniest violin). Hopefully, some of these films will be coming soon to a theater near you…

Bad Black –Some films defy description. This is one of them. Yet…a guilty pleasure. Written, directed, filmed, and edited by Ugandan action movie auteur Nabwana I.G.G.at his self-proclaimed “Wakaliwood studios” (essentially his house in the slums of Wakaliga), it’s best described as Kill Bill meets Slumdog Millionaire, with a kick-ass heroine bent on revenge. Despite a low budget and a high body count, it’s winningly ebullient and self-referential, with a surprising amount of social realism regarding slum life packed into its 68 minutes. The Citizen Kane of African commando vengeance flicks.

Rating: ***½ (Plays May 20, 22 & 25)

Becoming Who I Was – Until credits rolled for this South Korean entry by co-directors Chang-Yong Moon and Jeon Jin, I was unsure whether I’d seen a beautifully cinematic documentary, or a narrative film with amazingly naturalistic performances. Either way, I experienced the most compassionate, humanist study this side of Ozu. Turns out, it’s all quite real, and an obvious labor of love by the film makers, who went to Northern India and Tibet to document young “Rinpoche” Angdu Padma and his mentor/caregiver for 8 years as they struggle hand to mouth and strive to fulfill the boy’s destiny (he is believed to have been a revered Buddhist teacher in a past life). A moving journey (in both the literal and spiritual sense) that has a lot to say about the meaning of love and selflessness.

Rating: **** (US Premiere; Plays May 21 and May 23)

Bill Frisell: A Portrait – He doesn’t “shred” or do windmills on stage. In fact, he looks more like a college professor who drives a 1972 Volvo than a peer-revered guitar slinger that most people have never heard of. I will confess that even I (an alleged music geek) couldn’t name one Bill Frisell song. Yet, this unassuming Seattle-based virtuoso has 35 solo albums and scores of sessions with more well-known artists to his credit. He’s also tough to nail down; All Music Guide files him under a dozen genres, including Modern Creative, Post-Bop, New Acoustic, World Fusion, and Progressive Folk. Emma Franz’s film, while perhaps just a smidge overlong for anyone but a super-fan, nicely conveys the joy of creating, and as its title infers-delivers an amiable portrait of a an inventive player.

Rating: *** (Plays May 24, May 25 & June 1)

Entanglement – Any film that opens with a suicide attempt makes me wary; because let’s face it, they can’t all be Harold and Maude (but oh, they try…how they do try!). This Canadian mumblecore dramedy (directed by Jason James) stars Thomas Middleditch as a (wait for it) depressed divorcee who finds out his parents adopted but then quickly gave up a baby girl after a surprise pregnancy. And so this “only child” sets off on a quest to find and connect with the almost-sister that he never had. Very droll. It’s engaging enough to hold your interest, but marred by a certain amount of predictability.

Rating: **½ (World Premiere; Plays May 20 and May 24)

The Fabulous Allan Carr – If you learn one thing about the business we call “show” from Jeffrey Schwarz’s profile of late movie producer Allan Carr, it’s this: For every Grease, there’s a Grease 2. Yes, the same man produced both films. But there was a lot more to this flamboyant showman, who first demonstrated his inherent genius for turning lemons into lemonade when he secured domestic distribution for a no-budget Mexican exploitation flick about the Uruguayan rugby team plane crash survivors who kept alive by gnawing on their less fortunate teammates (you remember Survive!). He produced some huge hits…and probably more misses. But his hits were big enough to sustain a hedonistic lifestyle, which included legendarily over-the-top parties. An entertaining paean to a special type of excess that flourished from the mid-1970s thru the early 1980s.

Rating: *** (World Premiere; Plays May 20)

The Farthest – Some of my fondest childhood memories are of being plunked in front of the TV, transfixed by the reassuring visage of Walter Cronkite, with the familiar backdrop of the Cape Canaveral launch pad. Remember when NASA spaceflights were an exciting, all-day news event? We seem to have lost that collective feeling of wonder and curiosity about mankind’s plunge into the cosmos (people are too busy looking down at their goddam phones to stargaze anymore). Emer Reynolds’ beautifully made documentary about the twin Voyager space probes rekindles that excitement for any of us who dare to look up. And if the footage of Carl Sagan’s eloquent musings regarding the “pale blue dot” that we call home fails to bring you to tears, then surely you have no soul.

Rating: **** (Plays May 20 and May 24)

The Force – Peter Nicks’ documentary examines the rocky relationship between Oakland’s police department and its communities of color. The force has been under federal oversight since 2002, due to myriad misconduct cases. Nicks utilizes the same cinema verite techniques that made his film The Waiting Room so compelling (my review). It’s like a real-life Joseph Wambaugh novel (The Choirboys comes to mind). The film offers no easy answers-but delivers an intimate, insightful glimpse at both sides.

Rating: *** (Plays May 20 and May 24)

Pyromaniac – It’s not your imagination…”Nordic noir” is a thing (e.g. Scandinavian TV series like The Bridge, Wallander, and the Millennium trilogy). One of the progenitors was Erik Skjoldbjærg’s critically acclaimed 1997 thriller Insomnia (not to be confused with Christopher Nolan’s 2002 remake). The Norwegian director returns with this somewhat glacially-paced but nonetheless involving drama about the son of a fire chief who goes on a fire setting spree. The troubled protagonist’s psychosexual issues reminded me of the lead character in Equus. Beautifully photographed by Gosta Reiland.

Rating: *** (Plays May 20, 22, & 31)

Rocketmen – Well, if you (like me) have completely missed out on the web series concerning “…the deranged comedic adventures of Seattle’s little-known protectors, The Department of Municipal Rocketry”, have I got news for you. It’s now been distilled into a handy feature film. The result? A feature film that looks like a web series. On film. As someone who loves cheesy 50s sci-fi and the old Republic serials, I “get” what writer-director-animator Webster Crowell was going for here; his cast is obviously having fun, and his self-animated special effects are cleverly interwoven, but-it never quite takes off.

Rating: ** (World Premiere; Plays May 25, May 28, & June 5)

White Sun – Director Deepak Rauniyar uses the family row that ensues when a Maoist rebel returns to his isolated mountain village for his Royalist father’s funeral as an allegory for the political woes that have divided and ravaged his home country of Nepal. Naturalistic performances and rugged location shooting greatly enhance a story that beautifully illustrates how a country’s people, like members of an estranged family, must strive to rediscover common ground before meaningful healing can begin.

Rating: *** (Plays May 22 & May 30)

Previous posts with related themes:

2017 SIFF Preview
More reviews at Den of Cinema
On Facebook
On Twitter

.

I guess he brought the entire family and cabinet on this trip

I guess he brought the entire family and cabinet on this trip

by digby

blockquote class=”twitter-tweet” data-partner=”tweetdeck”>

please enjoy this footage of the secretaries of commerce and state dancing awkwardly while holding swords pic.twitter.com/KrkoGRS8fW

— David Mack (@davidmackau) May 20, 2017

Insert your dark joke here.

And remember this?

Saudi women are forced to cover up when they leave their homes but visiting Western female dignitaries tend not to cover their heads when visiting. Neither Theresa May nor Angela Merkel wore headscarves during their visits earlier this year.

Weird. A journalist talks to some people who *didn’t* vote for Trump.

Weird. A journalist talks to some people who didn’t vote for Trump.

by digby

Naturally, it’s a Canadian journalist, Daniel Dale, who writes for the Toronto Star:

A struggling post-industrial town. A Christian factory worker praying “constantly” for Donald Trump. Ernarda Davis, 65, is the kind of person Trump vowed to help, living in the kind of place Trump vowed to heal, and she wants badly for her president to succeed.

You’ve heard this kind of story before. Except people who look like Davis don’t usually qualify for 2017 articles about how voters are feeling about Trump.

She is black.

And when she was asked in Petersburg, Va., last weekend how Trump is doing so far, she curved her fingers into a rigid circle.

Zero.

“He needs to get hate out of his heart and open his eyes. And that might help,” she said. “Get hate out of his heart, open his eyes, and see what’s going on.”

The U.S. media narrative of the past year has been dominated by accounts of white Trump voters standing by their man no matter what they hear on the news. Their unyielding loyalty is important. But also noteworthy is Trump’s inability to earn even the fleeting honeymoon support of just about anyone who didn’t vote for him.

No group is so fiercely opposed to Trump as African Americans, a group he had promised to make a top priority.

I know it’s shocking to hear from average Americans who didn’t vote for Trump. If you watch the mainstream news you hear plenty of elite disdain but you never hear from the people. All you see on television are older white people who tell the reporters that while they wish he wouldn’t tweet so much there is nothing that he has done or could ever do to change their minds about him. They have always been a minority of the public and that minority is getting smaller all the time. It’s nice to hear from some of that huge majority for a change.

.

Nobody ever said you shouldn’t curtsy

Nobody ever said you shouldn’t curtsy

by digby

Via Axios:

Although Trump shook the Saudi King’s hand when they first met, he slightly bowed after receiving the medal, as seen in the video above. Yet Conservatives have been relatively quiet on the matter, or if they are addressing it, they’re spinning the news to be pro-Trump.

Fox News headline: “Trump shakes hands with Saudi leader, doesn’t bow as Obama appeared to do”

In 2009 when Obama greeted the Saudi King with a bow (which the WH later denied), conservatives and GOP members were not happy about it.

2009 conservative coverage:

The NRSC: The campaign arm for Republican senators, even ran a web ad using an image of Obama and the king to solicit donations. “Should America Bow To A King?” the ad asked, with a “Yes” and “No” option, the latter highlighted in red. The fundraising campaign came with a statement from NRSC Executive Director Rob Jesmer:

“President Obama paid fealty to Saudi King Abdullah by bowing to him at the G-20 Summit in London. …it’s becoming increasingly apparent that our new President would rather be accepted and befriended by his new friends abroad, than preserve America’s reputation and leadership as the world’s pre-eminent superpower.

Washington Times editorial: “In a shocking display of fealty to a foreign potentate, President Obama bowed to Saudi King Abdullah …The bow was an extraordinary protocol violation.”

Shot: “Press outlets have been conspicuously silent on Mr. Obama’s bow.”

Chaser: “Mr. Obama is proving that one can be elected president without knowing how to behave presidentially.”
American Thinker blog: “I am quite certain this is most unbecoming of the President.”

Fox News: “American presidents do not bow to anyone. They do not bow to heads of state, monarchs, potentates, popes or any other mere mortal. When President Obama bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia earlier this year the White House rushed to spin it away. They claimed that it was not a ‘bow’ at all. The White House stated that the president was ‘stooping’ to look the feeble king in the eye while shaking hands.”

The kicker: “Well, you can fool some of the people some of the time. The pictures and the video said it all. Obama bowed to the Saudi king.”

lulz.

.

Mixed feelings

Mixed feelings

by digby

Only 6% of people have them about Trump. Everyone else knows exactly how they feel about him. And most of them don’t approve:

Public approval of President Donald Trump has dropped to its lowest level since his inauguration, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Friday, after Trump was accused of mishandling classified information and meddling with an FBI investigation.

The May 14-18 opinion poll found that 38 percent of adults approved of Trump while 56 percent disapproved. The remaining 6 percent had “mixed feelings.”

 Here’s how it looks:

This part is important because it impacts the way these GOP miscreants calculate their positions on big legislation and then 2018:

Among Republicans, 23 percent expressed disapproval of Trump in the latest poll, up from 16 percent in the same poll last week. The decline in support from Republicans appears to be a primary reason why Trump’s overall approval rating is now at the lowest level since he took office.

I’m all for any legal method of removing Trump from office, whether resignation, 25th Amendment or impeachment. But it’s very important that Democrats win elections and the American people repudiate this Republican party’s descent into madness. It takes a while for that to happen. (And it doesn’t last…)

Last time it took the monumental debacles of Katrina, Iraq and a worldwide economic meltdown to pry a small number of people away from their GOP identity to vote for Barack Obama. Let’s hope they wise up a little bit sooner this time.

.

GOP leadership knew about Dana

GOP leadership knew about Dana

by digby

Dana Rohrabacher didn’t keep his admiration for Vladimir Putin a secret. But apparently, the Russians thought he was quite the useful idiot. And the GOP leadership has known about it since 2012:

The F.B.I. warned a Republican congressman in 2012 that Russian spies were trying to recruit him, officials said, an example of how aggressively Russian agents have tried to influence Washington politics.


The congressman, Dana Rohrabacher of California, has been known for years as one of Moscow’s biggest defenders in Washington and as a vocal opponent of American economic sanctions against Russia. He claims to have lost a drunken arm-wrestling match with the current Russian president, Vladimir V. Putin, in the 1990s. He is one of President Trump’s staunchest allies on Capitol Hill.

As a newly appointed special counsel investigates connections between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, the warning to Mr. Rohrabacher shows that the F.B.I. has for years viewed Russian spies, sometimes posing as diplomats, as having a hand in Washington.

Mr. Rohrabacher was drawn into the maelstrom this week when The Washington Post reported on an audio recording of Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the House majority leader, saying last year, “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump.” Mr. McCarthy said on Wednesday that he had made a joke that landed poorly.

But the F.B.I. has taken seriously the possibility that Russian spies would target American politicians. In a secure room at the Capitol, an F.B.I. agent told Mr. Rohrabacher in 2012 that Russian spies were trying to recruit him as an “agent of influence” — someone the Russian government might be able to use to steer Washington policy-making, former officials said.

Mr. Rohrabacher said in a telephone interview on Thursday that the meeting had focused on his contact with one member of the Russian Foreign Ministry, whom he recalled meeting on a trip to Moscow. “They were telling me he had something to do with some kind of Russian intelligence,” Mr. Rohrabacher said. He recalled the F.B.I. agent saying that Moscow “looked at me as someone who could be influenced.”

Law enforcement officials did not think that Mr. Rohrabacher was actively working with Russian intelligence, officials said, rather that he was being targeted as an unwitting player in a Russian effort to gain access in Washington, according to one former American official. The official said there was no evidence that Mr. Rohrabacher was ever paid by the Russians.

Also at the meeting were Representative Mike Rogers, Republican of Michigan, and according to one former official, Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger, Democrat of Maryland. Mr. Rogers and Mr. Ruppersberger were the senior members of the House Intelligence Committee. In a brief telephone interview, Mr. Ruppersberger said that he recalled a meeting with Mr. Rogers and Mr. Rohrabacher, but did not remember that an F.B.I. agent was present. “Mike and I reminded Dana that Russia is our adversary,” he said.

Mr. Rogers, who has since retired from Congress, declined to comment.

Rogers was widely considered to be a top candidate for the FBI but his name seems to have slid down the list. He also served on Trump’s transition team (and quit in December.)

So basically the Intelligence Committee knew about this. Rohrabacher continued to be Russia’s greatest friend on Capitol Hill. And we know that the Republican leadership knew about this too because they were “joking” about it last year.

Obviously, there’s nothing inherently wrong with someone being a Russophile. Lot’s of people are. And I guess it’s no big deal as long as Rohrabacher didn’t have access to any information that could compromise national security. But if this affinity comes from a love of Putinesque strongman authoritarianism, it’s concerning nonetheless.

.

Sometimes nothin’ is not a real cool hand by @BloggersRUs

Sometimes nothin’ is not a real cool hand
by Tom Sullivan

The world is laughing at us, Donald Trump tells audiences. Long before he took to the campaign trail, he was obsessed with the notion that the world was laughing at our country, the USA, American leaders. Over 100 times in public statements going back as far as 1987, the Washington Post found. It is another of Trump’s “tells.” Every time he repeats it, one can’t help but feel it is he who fears being laughed at.

Contrary to Adam Gopnik’s account, it was not jokes from President Obama and Seth Meyers and the actual laughter at the 2011 White House Correspondents’ Dinner that launched his bid for the presidency. Trump considered running for president since the 1980s, perhaps once and for all to silence the laughing in his head. Now, as he embarks on his first foreign trip as president himself, that project is not going so well.

“Chaos.”
“Circus.”
“Laughingstock.”

Those were just a few of the comments I heard in Berlin this week from senior European officials trying to make sense of the meltdown in Washington at just the moment when a politically imploding President Trump embarks on what he called “my big foreign trip” in this morning’s kickoff tweet.

Politico’s Susan B. Glasser continues:

“People are less worried than they were six weeks ago, less afraid,” a senior German government official with extensive experience in the United States told me. “Now they see the clownish nature.” Or, as another German said on the sidelines of a meeting here devoted to taking stock of 70 years of U.S.-German relations, “People here think Trump is a laughingstock.”

“The dominant reaction to Trump right now is mockery,” Jacob Heilbrunn, the editor of the conservative journal the National Interest, told the meeting at the German Foreign Office here while moderating a panel on Trump’s foreign policy that dealt heavily on the difficulty of divining an actual policy amid the spectacle. Heilbrunn, whose publication hosted Trump’s inaugural foreign policy speech in Washington during last year’s campaign, used the ‘L’ word too. “The Trump administration is becoming an international laughingstock.” Michael Werz, a German expert from the liberal U.S. think tank Center for American Progress, agreed, adding he was struck by “how rapidly the American brand is depreciating over the last 20 weeks.”

For the man whose business is, primarily, his brand, the laughter is now real and not just in his head.

Foreign Policy reports, “NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to 2 to 4 minutes at a time during the discussion …” to Trump-proof the event:

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” one source told FP. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing. They’re freaking out.”

Trump may have nothing, but he nevertheless holds the presidency and his party controls the Congress and most state legislatures.

Der Spiegel describes the Trump presidency as “a vortex of scandals, chaos and lunacy.” Mathieu von Rohr continues:

It is becoming increasingly apparent that the only goal of Trump’s candidacy was the victory itself – demonstrating that he could win – rather than living up to his promises to his voters regarding health care reform or job creation. This is why Trump is obsessed with the critics he sees as trying to diminish his victory by reminding him that he didn’t win a majority of the votes. This is why the investigation of Russian influence in the election makes Trump so angry. He sees it as an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of his triumph, something for which he believes he is not being praised enough.

Bloomberg reports that the joke is not on Trump alone:

This week, however, the Russian jokes at the expense of the U.S. got positively unpleasant. First, President Vladimir Putin offered to provide the U.S. Congress with a recording of Lavrov’s conversation with Trump, in which the U.S. president allegedly revealed highly classified information (the word Putin used, zapis, cannot really be translated as “transcript”, as the Kremlin later claimed). The suggestion, of course, was sheer mockery — it’s impossible to imagine the Congress making such a request of Putin, and U.S. legislators tried to answer Putin in kind, Senator Marco Rubio suggesting that if Putin sent the information by email, he “wouldn’t click on the attachment.”

It goes on. Short of dying in office or FBI indictment of the president’s closest associates, this circus is not pulling up stakes anytime soon. Even though a recent poll finds Americans in favor of impeaching Trump 48-41, the GOP holds the reins in the congress, making impeachment highly unlikely. Their base won’t stand for it. But the GOP is also running out of time to complete its 2018 mid-term calculation: Are we more at risk by running with Trump or by trying to distance ourselves? If the economy continues to chug along, Trump’s base may stick with him however loud the laughter from foreign quarters, and maybe because of it.

The Denver Post reports:

John McKager “Mac” Stipanovich, a longtime GOP campaign operative in Florida, said he fears numerous other Republican losses in his state and around the country if the party cannot deliver on promises to repeal Obamacare and cut taxes.

“If after all of the talk, after all of the chest-thumping, we can’t get anything done, we may get clubbed like baby seals in 2018,” said Stipanovich, who was an early Trump critic.

After Trump did a fundraiser for Karen Handel, the GOP candidate running in the June 20 GA-06 special election against Democrat Jon Ossoff, Handel has distanced herself, the Denver Post reports. “During a fundraiser this week with House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., Trump’s name was not mentioned by either Handel or Ryan.”

That clubbing and distancing is what Democrats are hoping for. Trump’s Seinfeldian presidency about nothing is doomed to fail. But his failure is not Democrats’ success. They’ll need more than Trump backlash to win in 2018. And their track record with wishful thinking lately isn’t impressive.

The Democratic base appears energized and prepared for to fight. Whether they will actually turn out for midterm elections is anybody’s guess. (Famously, they don’t.) With the Russia investigation dominating the news and daily scandals from the White House, it is not just Trump’s agenda that is being lost in the shuffle. Whether or not they have anything substantive (or at least, inspiring) to offer, anti-Trumpism is the only message seeing the light of day, and that is a whole lot of nothin’. “Sometimes nothin’ can be a real cool hand,” Paul Newman said famously on film. That didn’t work out too well either.

Friday Night Soother

Friday Night Soother

by digby

Because you need a baby seal pup tonight like you’ve never needed one before:

A man captured a video of a incredibly precious baby elephant seal encounter on the island of South Georgia in Antarctic waters.

The man was sitting on the ground filming wildlife when the seal pup approached him with a darling expression on his face and nuzzled his feet, apparently attempting to suckle his boot.

The man said the local seal pups were recently weaned by their mothers, and it takes time for them to adjust.

“If you just sit down, they will slowly approach and try to suckle anything and everything—boots, face, hands, camera, tripod,” the uploader wrote.

“Interestingly, if they survive into adulthood, they will become the largest seal on the planet. I had to physically push it off my lap, laughing the whole time.”

Here is another close encounter with a charming elephant seal pup.

.