Skip to content

Month: November 2017

They loved Trump from the start

They loved Trump from the startby digby


This is strange. The Russians backed Trump very early. Why would they do that?

Kremlin-backed support for Donald Trump’s candidacy over social media began much earlier than previously known, a new analysis of Twitter data shows. Russian Twitter accounts posing as Americans began lavishing praise on Mr. Trump and attacking his rivals within weeks after he announced his bid for the presidency in June 2015, according to the analysis by The Wall Street Journal.

….In the three months after Mr. Trump announced his presidential candidacy on June 16, 2015, tweets from Russian accounts reviewed by the Journal offered far more praise for the real-estate businessman than criticism—by nearly a 10-to-1 margin. At the same time, the accounts generally were hostile to Mrs. Clinton and the early GOP front-runner, Jeb Bush, by equal or greater margins.

Kevin Drum takes a stab at some of the reasons why they might have chosen to back this gadfly so early in the primary season:

It was just a test. Social media manipulation was new to the Russians too, and they figured Trump might make an interesting test of how effective it could be.

In the early days, you had to be very, very cynical about the United States to think that a race-baiting blowhard like Trump had a chance to win. Maybe Putin knew us better than we knew ourselves.

The Russians never really thought Trump had a chance of winning. He just seemed like a good vehicle to sow a bit of random chaos.

This whole thing started at a fairly low level by some guy who’d been pushing to “really try out this social media stuff.” His superiors finally got tired of him and told him to knock himself out. This low-level guy, it turns out, was a big Trump fan for personal reasons we’ll never know.

I’ve got another one: they had a deal.

.

No, Jose Andres isn’t begging for FEMA money

No, Jose Andres isn’t begging for FEMA moneyby digby

God, everything is life isn’t about shilling for money. But I guess that’s how we think in 2017:

The Trump administration has found itself in a public feud with celebrity chef Jose Andrés, who has helped cook and deliver more than 2 million meals to help out the citizens of hurricane-devastated Puerto Rico.

One FEMA official tells BuzzFeed that the agency is dismissing Andrés’ criticisms of the agency as being made by a “colorful guy who gets a lot of exposure” and “a businessman looking for stuff to promote his business.”

FEMA says that Andres, who was contracted by FEMA to help make meals to give to Puerto Ricans trying to recover from the destruction left by Hurricane Maria in September, was unhappy that his organization, the World Central Kitchen, was not given a long-term contract to help people harmed by the hurricane. The agency says that it could only offer World Central Kitchen short-term two-week contracts, or else it would have to go through the formal federal bidding process.

However, Andrés tells BuzzFeed that it’s not right for FEMA to claim that his criticisms stem from purely selfish motivations.

“For them to say I was a businessman trying to make a buck, whoever said that should be very ashamed of themselves,” Andrés told the publication.

Yes they should. He is one of the most famous chefs in th world. He doesn’t need money.

He is not a friend of Trump’s though, that’s for sure. He’s one of the chefs who backed out of he contract at Trump’s DC hotel after he demagogued immigrants and Trump sued. So there’s history there. But Andres is certainly not feeding people in Puerto Rico and complaining about the response because he wants money from the government. That’s just ridiculous.

.

Did Trump Jr imply he could deliver?

Did Trump Jr imply he could deliver?by digby


I have no idea what this means but it’s interesting.
The Russian lawyer in that Trump Tower meeting says Junior was interested in a little horsetrading:

A Russian lawyer who met with President Donald Trump’s oldest son last year says he indicated that a law targeting Russia could be re-examined if his father won the election and asked her for written evidence that illegal proceeds went to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

The lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, said in a two-and-a-half-hour interview in Moscow that she would tell these and other things to the Senate Judiciary Committee on condition that her answers be made public, something it hasn’t agreed to. She has received scores of questions from the committee, which is investigating possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Veselnitskaya said she’s also ready — if asked — to testify to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Her June 9, 2016 encounter with Donald Trump Jr., President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and then campaign manager Paul Manafort in New York plays a key role in allegations that the campaign worked with Russia to defeat Clinton.

Veselnitskaya said she went to the New York meeting to show Trump campaign officials that major Democratic donors had evaded U.S. taxes and to lobby against the so-called Magnitsky law that punishes Russian officials for the murder of a Russian tax accountant who accused the Kremlin of corruption.

‘If We Come to Power’

“Looking ahead, if we come to power, we can return to this issue and think what to do about it,’’ Trump Jr. said of the 2012 law, she recalled. “I understand our side may have messed up, but it’ll take a long time to get to the bottom of it,” he added, according to her.

Veselnitskaya also said Trump Jr. requested financial documents showing that money that allegedly evaded U.S. taxes had gone to Clinton’s campaign. She didn’t have any and described the 20-minute meeting as a failure.

Who know what she’s up to? Clearly there’s a lot of game playing going on so I won’t say that this actually means anything. The most intriguing speculation I’ve seen on this is the idea that somebody in that meeting wore a wire. But again, who knows what was actually said?

This article from last July
about Rinat Akhmetshin, one of the attendees at that meeting, is interesting in light of all this. We know he testified before the Grand Jury…


Update:
Emptywheel has a very interesting timeline here that casts the story in a whole different direction.
.

Yes, he is really this dumb

Yes, he is really this dumnby digby

Yes, of course he is:

Several Japanese automobile industry firms have been really doing a job. And we love it when you build cars — if you’re a Japanese firm, we love it — try building your cars in the United States instead of shipping them over. Is that possible to ask? That’s not rude. Is that rude? I don’t think so. (Laughter.) If you could build them.

He did acknowledge in his usual jumbled rhetoric that the japanese already build cars in the US, so he remembered that he’d been briefed about the fact that they do “contribute” to our economy.

But this comment betrays something he deeply believes and it informs his ideas about trade, such as they are.

Here he is talking about the same issue in 2016 in an interview with Bob Woodward:

DT: You look at Japan. They send their cars in here by the hundreds of thousands. You go to Los Angeles, you look at those docks, and these cars get driven off those boats at 40 miles an hour. You’ve never seen anything like it. They just come pouring into our country. And yet when — you talk about an imbalance, when it comes to us selling to Japan? They take very little.

This is the man everyone looked to as the big expert on “trade” who was going to bring back manufacturing jobs to America. He’s a dunce. But you knew that.

Also, his mention of being “rude” has particular resonance in Japan which places great store in manners. Again, he was briefed on this so he had to mention it. He’s unable to behave like a normal adult.

.

He would “love” to be spending his time locking up his enemies

He would “love” to be spending his time locking up his enemiesby digby

I wrote about Trump’s increasingly common authoritarian rhetoric for Salon this morning:
President Donald Trump is overseas right now, doing personal appearances at his properties and making a fool of himself. So far, he’s asked Japanese car makers to start making cars in the United States, apparently ignorant of the fact that three out of four Japanese-branded cars and trucks are already manufactured in America. And he hawked U.S. military equipment as if he were selling Trump steaks on YouTube.

That wasn’t the worst of it. He also told American and Japanese troops that no nation should “underestimate American resolve.” Then he quipped, “Every once in a while, in the past, they underestimated us. It was not pleasant for them, was it?”

Trump’s previous foreign trips have also been embarrassing, but he seems more off-kilter than usual this time. That’s obviously because of the pressure he’s under back home, with the indictments of his former campaign officials by special counsel Robert Mueller. That pressure has once again brought out into the open the authoritarian impulses that are becoming more and more pronounced by the day.

Back when Trump took out full-page ads calling for capital punishment and allowing police to brutalize citizens, he was just another tabloid blowhard. And during the presidential campaign, when he endorsed torture and war crimes and made racist comments about a judge’s Mexican heritage, people assumed he was just being hyperbolic. When he repeatedly declared his opponent guilty of crimes, even spitting out the nasty jibe, “If I were president, you’d be in jail,” at Hillary Clinton in a presidential debate, nobody thought he actually meant it. But after more than nine months of his presidency, it’s become clear that Trump truly has no respect for the rule of law.

He’s gotten himself into some trouble because of this. He asked FBI director James Comey to give his friend Michael Flynn a pass and then fired Comey when he refused to play ball, an impulsive act that ended up with the appointment of Mueller. Trump then tried to get the Justice Department to go easy on former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and when that didn’t happen he just pulled out his pardon pen and set Arpaio free, sending a strong message to all his cronies that he looked out for those who stood by him. But the one thing that both thrills his supporters and gives him sustenance is continually calling for Hillary Clinton to be prosecuted.

Just before the president set out for his Asia trip, he went on a Twitter spree and gave a series of interviews that made it clear he’s serious about this. He tweeted frantically about the bogus story being pushed by Fox News about Clinton supposedly “selling out” the country to the Russians in that 2010 uranium deal. Trump made his most revealing comments of all on a radio show last Thursday:

I look at what’s happening with the Justice Department. Well, why aren’t they going after Hillary Clinton with her emails and with her — the dossier? I’m very unhappy with it, that the Justice Department isn’t going. I am not supposed to be doing the kind of things that I would love to be doing. And I am very frustrated by it.

The reason I say it’s revealing is that one phrase: “I am not supposed to be doing the kinds of things I would love to be doing.” Clearly, what Trump would love to be doing is persecuting his defeated political rival. Whether he would love to do that out of simple sadism or because he thinks it would effectively intimidate those who are investigating him or simply to muddy the waters is unknown. To do it based upon discredited disinformation created by Fox News and various Republican operatives, working together in what has basically become his personal propaganda operation, makes it all the more chilling. This is the work of a dictator in a banana republic, not the elected leader of a major Western democracy.

The fact that all this is being met with a big public shrug is more than a little bit worrisome. The president may not be officially directing the Department of Justice to prosecute Hillary Clinton on spurious grounds, but DOJ officials certainly know he would “love” them to. Republicans in Congress also understand the game that’s afoot. They’ve initiated three different “investigations” into these ridiculous Clinton questions and on Friday took the next step, proposing a resolution that calls for Mueller to “resign from his special counsel position immediately,” since he was FBI director when Clinton allegedly committed all her traitorous crimes and therefore showed “willful blindness” to Russians to infiltrate the United States and spread corruption.

Trump’s authoritarian tendencies are showing up in other ways as well. Axios reports that when he met with Native American tribal leaders and they complained about land use regulations that prevented them from extracting energy resources, he responded, “But now it’s me, the government’s different now. Obama’s gone; and we’re doing things differently here. So what I’m saying is, just do it.” Trump may actually believe he has the unilateral power to lift any regulation he wants to, and he unquestionably wishes that were true.

He recently told reporters, “My attitude is the only one that matters,” when it comes to dealing with North Korea, adding that he is “stronger and tougher” than his advisers. Similarly, when Fox News host Laura Ingraham asked Trump last week whether he planned to fill appointments at the State Department, he replied, “Let me tell you, the one that matters is me. I’m the only one that matters, because when it comes to it, that’s what the policy is going to be.”

We don’t know how much this president really understands about the limits of his authority. And we don’t know how far the members of his own party and law enforcement officials who support him are willing to go. But we know what he would “love” to do because he’s told us. He would love to use the police power of the federal government for his own purposes. By firing Comey and pardoning Arpaio, he’s already pushed the boundaries. This used to be called abuse of power. Under Trump it’s business as usual.

Do NOT speak against Dear Leader

Do NOT speak against Dear Leader by digby

In America you can say what we want about politics if you work for yourself — or a company that doesn’t have anything to do with the government or isn’t run by someone who disagrees with you. Otherwise …

The picture, snapped by a White House photographer traveling with the president as he left his golf course in Sterling, Va., went viral almost immediately. News outlets picked up the story when it appeared in a White House pool report. Late-night talk show hosts told jokes about the encounter and people on social media began hailing the unidentified woman as a “she-ro,” using the hashtag #Her2020.

The woman’s name is Juli Briskman. Her employer, government contractor Akima LLC, wasn’t so happy about the photo. They fired her over it.

In a Saturday interview with HuffPost, Briskman, a 50-year-old mother of two, said she was stunned that someone had taken a picture of her giving Trump the middle finger.

As the photo circulated online, Briskman decided to tell Akima’s HR department what was happening when she went to work on Monday. By Tuesday, her bosses called her into a meeting and said she had violated the company’s social media policy by using the photo as her profile picture on Twitter and Facebook.

“They said, ‘We’re separating from you,‘” said Briskman. “Basically, you cannot have ‘lewd’ or ‘obscene’ things in your social media. So they were calling flipping him off ‘obscene.’”

Briskman, who worked in marketing and communications at Akima for just over six months, said she emphasized to the executives that she wasn’t on the job when the incident happened and that her social media pages don’t mention her employer. They told her that because Akima was a government contractor, the photo could hurt their business, she said.

Virginia is an employment-at-will state, meaning employers can fire people anytime and for any reason. But Briskman said what’s been particularly infuriating is that a male colleague kept his job after recently posting lewd comments on his Facebook page that featured Akima LLC as his cover photo. She said this colleague was reprimanded for calling someone “a fucking Libtard asshole” on Facebook, but was allowed to delete the post and keep his job.

There’s nothing she can do. “At will” employment means they can fire her for anything that isn’t a class protected by law. You can be fired for anything you say that the boss doesn’t like, including a political opinion.

Someone else, with a more liberal understanding of what’s important in America should hire her immediately.

.

Reset the “Now is not the time…” clock by @BloggersRUs

Reset the “Now is not the time…” clock
by Tom Sullivan

Opioids aren’t the only addiction epidemic killing people in America.

Buzzfeed:

  • At least 26 people are dead after a gunman opened fire during a Sunday service at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas.
  • Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said via Twitter: “Our prayers are with all who were harmed by this evil act.”
  • President Trump wrote on Twitter while visiting Japan: “May God be w/ the people of Sutherland Springs, Texas.”

We just reset out clocks Sunday morning, so why the hell not reset the “Now is not the time…” clock?

Cue Sarah Sanders.

Cue Mitch McConnell.

Cue the NRA.

“Now is not the time…” has been the NRA’s response for so many years, it’s as much a punchline as “thoughts and prayers” (the people at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs were praying).

Dave Weigel pointed out the “now is not the time” reflex in 2012:

After the Feb. 14, 2008, shootings at Northern Illinois University that killed six: “We think it is poor form for a politician or a special interest group to try to push a legislative agenda on the back of any tragedy. Now is the time for the Northern Illinois University community to grieve and to heal. We believe there is adequate time down the road to debate policy and politics.”

After the April 3, 2009, massacre at a Binghamton, N.Y., immigration center that killed 13: “Now is not the time to debate politics or discuss policy. It’s time for the families and communities to grieve.”

After the Jan. 8, 2011, shooting spree that wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed six: “At this time, anything other than prayers for the victims and their families would be inappropriate.”

After the July 20, 2012, massacre at an Aurora, Colo., theater that left 12 dead and 58 wounded: “We believe that now is the time for families to grieve and for the community to heal. There will be an appropriate time down the road to engage in political and policy discussions.”

Will someone please call into INFOWARS to speculate that regular mass shootings are an NRA plot to reset the clock every few weeks to ensure it is never “the time”? Otherwise, it is feeling as if we are all trapped in an episode of The Twilight Zone.

* * * * * * * *

Request a copy of For The Win, my county-level election mechanics primer, at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

It worked for Bush the Elder by tristero

It worked for Bush the Elder

by tristero

The NY Times:

You may recall the Horton commercial, which the elder George Bush ran in his 1988 presidential campaign. It showed a black man who had raped a white woman and assaulted her husband while free on a Massachusetts prison-furlough program that was supported by Michael Dukakis, the Democratic candidate. As a vote magnet, it worked for Mr. Bush. 

Indeed it did. What distinguishes Bush’s appeal to racists from the use of racist ads by modern Republicans is…well, I can’t think of any:

[Republican NY Nassau county executive candidate Jack Martin’s] mailer shows three shirtless Latino men, covered in tattoos and representing MS-13, the vicious gang begun by Central American immigrants in Los Angeles that now menaces Long Island. “Meet Your New Neighbors!” a headline above them says, adding this about Mr. Martins’s Democratic opponent: “Laura Curran will roll out the welcome mat for violent gangs like MS-13!” Ms. Curran, the text says, is “MS-13’s choice for county executive.”

But wait, there’s more:

In the close Virginia governor’s race, an ad for the Republican candidate, Ed Gillespie, links the Democrat, Ralph Northam, to a sanctuaries-cities policy that “let illegal immigrants who commit crimes back on the street, increasing the threat of MS-13.” 

In New Jersey, a plainly desperate Kim Guadagno, the Republican nominee for governor, reached back a decade in a dismal attempt to pin a soft-on-immigrant-crime tag on the Democratic front-runner, Phil Murphy. A Guadagno commercial twists a Murphy comment about undocumented immigrants — his “having their back” — as somehow meaning he supports a brutal killer named Jose Carranza. 

Mr. Carranza, an unlawful arrival from Peru, was one of six men found guilty in the execution-style murder of three young people in a Newark schoolyard in 2007. “Murphy,” the Guadagno ad says, “will have the backs of deranged murderers like Carranza.” 

Yes, the lessons Poppy Bush taught Republicans have never been forgotten.

The definition of insanity

The definition of insanityby digby

They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Actually, the definition of insanity is electing mentally deranged people to be the Attorney General of your state.

By the way, there was a mass shooting at a Walmart in Colorado a few days ago. A bunch of poeple were armed. Look what happened:

The chaos of panicked people running out of the store, shoppers who pulled their own guns and multiple victims created a difficult situation for police and slowed their investigation.

Meanwhile, the suspected gunman, Scott Ostrem, remained at-large until he was captured by police at 8:11 a.m. Thursday about six miles from the scene, stuck in rush-hour traffic in Westminster..

The shots were reported at 6:10 p.m. Wednesday, and Thornton police sent the first tweet about it at 6:27 p.m.

The first officers on scene needed to assess the situation and develop a strategy to go inside because it was unknown whether the shooter was dead or alive and whether he was still inside or already fleeing with the store’s customers and employees, Avila said. Police teams searched the other stores in the Thornton Town Center and the surrounding area.

Police also had to make sure paramedics and EMTs could safely reach victims. And then once they determined the store was secure, detectives escorted a store employee back inside to begin reviewing security video footage from the dozens of cameras in the store and the shopping center parking lot.

“We had a lot of footage, and hundreds of people self-evacuating,” Avila said. “Obviously, it took time.”

When detectives began reviewing video footage, they noticed multiple people drawing guns, Avila said. That slowed the process of identifying who and how many suspects were involved in the shooting, he said.

“Once the building was safe enough to get into it, we started reviewing that (surveillance video) as quickly as we could,” he said. “That’s when we started noticing” that a number of individuals had pulled weapons. “At that point, as soon as you see that, that’s the one you try to trace through the store, only to maybe find out that’s not him, and we’re back to ground zero again, starting to look again. That’s what led to the extended time.”

These NRA zealots are like robots. Brainwashed and unable to think for themselves. They will never change their mantra and I don’t know what it will take to change this country. One thing is certain — it does not matter how many innocent people are gunned down so these cultists can have their lethal toys. It will take something besides the river of blood this country is drowning in to make it change. I have no idea what that might be.

.

ICYWW, Trump is in freefall

ICYWW, Trump is in freefallby digby

There’s been so much news the past few days that this is buried. But it’s interesting. He is… uhm …not popular. Not at all: And it’s getting worse, not better:

A majority of Americans say President Trump has not accomplished much during his first nine months in office and they have delivered a report card that is far harsher even than the tepid expectations they set for his tenure when he was sworn into office, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News survey.

Approaching the first anniversary of his victory over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election, Trump has an approval rating demonstrably lower than any previous chief executive at this point in his presidency over seven decades of polling. Fewer than 4 in 10 Americans — 37 percent — say they approve of the way he is handling his job.

Trump’s approval rating has changed little over the past four months, which have included tumultuous events, from hurricanes to legislative setbacks to indictments in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation into the role Russia played in the 2016 campaign.

President Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Manafort’s former business associate Rick Gates and Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos have all been charged in the special counsel’s investigation into Russian election interference.

The president’s disapproval rating has reached 59 percent, with 50 percent saying they strongly disapprove of the job he is doing. While little changed since the summer, both represent the worst marks of his presidency.

He is the only president dating back to Harry S. Truman whose approval rating at this point in his presidency is net negative — by 22 points. The next worst recorded in that time was Bill Clinton, who had a net positive of 11 points by this time in his presidency.

Trump began his presidency with only modest expectations on the part of a public that was divided coming out of last year’s contentious election. Roughly 100 days into his presidency, 42 percent said he had accomplished a great deal or a good amount while in office. Today, that has declined to 35 percent.

Meanwhile, 65 percent say he has accomplished “not much” or “little or nothing.” This is up from 56 percent last spring. Forty-three percent of all Americans give him the lowest possible rating, saying he has accomplished “little or nothing.”

At the 100-day mark of Trump’s presidency last spring, Americans were split almost evenly on the question of whether he was keeping most of his major campaign promises, with 44 percent saying he was and 41 percent disagreeing. Today the verdict is more severe, with a majority (55 percent) saying he is not keeping most of those promises.

The public sees Democrats acting mostly as an opposition party, rather than offering ideas of their own. Asked whether the Democratic Party is presenting alternatives to Trump’s proposals or mainly criticizing the president, 61 percent said mainly criticizing, identical to the percentage who said this of Republican Party leaders one year after Obama’s election. Only a plurality of Democrats (47 percent) say their leaders are offering alternatives to Trump’s ideas.

Trump’s actions and behavior have drawn sharp criticism from a few members of his own party, most recently from Sens. Bob Corker of Tennessee and Jeff Flake and John McCain of Arizona. Former president George W. Bush delivered a recent speech that, while never mentioning Trump by name, was seen as a rebuke of the way the president is conducting himself in office.

The Post-ABC News poll asked self-identified Republicans and independents who lean toward the GOP whether they believed their party leaders should speak out when they disagree with the president. Overall, 71 percent said they should, with just 27 percent saying those leaders should avoid criticizing him, including 65 percent of Trump voters who say Republicans should air their disagreements.

On four key issues, Trump has not matched the early expectations for his presidency, and today, majorities — in some case strong majorities — give him negative reviews. Those issues are the economy, dealing with race relations, improving the health-care system and dealing with the threat of terrorism. (Part of this survey was conducted before the terrorist attack on Tuesday that left eight people dead in New York.)

The president has pointed to what he sees as significant accomplishments in the area of the economy, with the stock market at record levels, unemployment at 4.1 percent — a 17-year low — and growth in the two most recent quarters at 3 percent.

But the public gives him little credit for the state of the economy. Last January, 61 percent offered a positive assessment when asked how they thought he would handle the economy. Today, 44 percent give him positive marks, while 53 percent say he has not done well.

In January, a majority (56 percent) said they believed he would do an excellent or good job dealing with threats of terrorism. Today, 43 percent give him positive reviews.

Trump receives even lower ratings on race and health care. Fewer than 3 in 10 say he has done a good job dealing with race relations, which is 12 points below the 40 percent who said in January they thought he would handle race issues effectively. Half of all Americans say they believe Trump is biased against black people and slightly more (55 percent) say he is biased against women.

The racial assessment follows a backlash to Trump’s comments about the white supremacist rally in August in Charlottesville, where marchers chanted Nazi slogans and the ensuing violence left one woman dead and others injured. Two state police officers also died when their helicopter crashed after assisting in the unrest. Trump was slow to condemn the marchers and at one point said there were “very fine people” among the neo-Nazi demonstrators.

In January, 44 percent said they expected him to handle the issue of health care effectively, including 87 percent of Republicans. Optimism has faded sharply, with 26 percent of Americans and 59 percent of Republicans giving him positive marks today. The overall percentage offering a negative assessment has jumped from 51 percent in January to 70 percent today, including 47 percent who give him the lowest rating, “poor.”

Political independents have soured the most considering Trump’s pre-inaugural expectations and current ratings. The percentage of independents saying Trump is doing a good job on the economy, race relations and health care is more than 20 points lower than the percentage that expected him to perform well in January. On terrorism, today’s ratings are 17 points below early expectations among independents.

Congressional Republicans were stymied in their efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, despite years of promises to do so. The House, after first failing to pass a bill, eventually approved a measure and sent it to the Senate. Senate Republican leaders struggled to get a health bill to the floor for consideration. When they did, they fell short of the necessary majority needed to keep the process moving.

Throughout that process, Trump prodded the Republican leadership, principally Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), with demeaning tweets demanding action. Ever since the effort broke down, Trump has attempted to focus the ire of disappointed conservatives on those congressional Republicans, but the failed effort also appears to have taken a toll on him.

A solid majority (59 percent) also see Trump as trying to make the federal health law fail. Less than one-tenth of the public says they support those efforts to scuttle the law through executive actions, while overall, 50 percent of the public opposes what they see as Trump undermining the existing program.

As tensions mount over North Korea’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon and delivery system capable of hitting the United States, the public has little trust in the president to handle the problem responsibly. A majority (51 percent) say they trust him “not at all” on this national security issue and 16 percent say they trust him “just some.” Meanwhile, 32 percent say they trust him “a great deal” or “a good amount.”

Other measures highlight the degree to which Trump is governing with the support of a minority of the population. Four in 10 say he is a strong leader. That’s 13 points below the level in April. On this question, he has gone from a net positive of eight points to a net negative of 19 points. Roughly twice as many Americans say that under Trump, U.S. leadership in the world has gotten weaker rather than stronger, 53 to 26 percent.

Trump campaigned on his dealmaking ability, but the public doubts his ability to forge political agreements. Almost 6 in 10 say he is not good at making political deals while under 4 in 10 say he is good at making deals.

One-third say he is honest and trustworthy, down only marginally since April. On the question of whether he has the temperament and personality needed to serve as president, 31 percent say yes, while 66 percent say no. That is the lowest since August 2016, when candidate Trump was embroiled in a controversy with a Gold Star family.