Skip to content

Month: December 2017

He’s got to be on diet pills

He’s got to be on diet pillsby digby

It’s been rumored for a very long time. It would also explain why he doesn’t sleep:

Elton John blares so loudly on Donald Trump’s campaign plane that staffers can’t hear themselves think. Press secretary Hope Hicks uses a steamer to press Trump’s pants — while he is still wearing them. Trump screams at his top aides, who are subjected to expletive-filled tirades in which they get their “face ripped off.”

And Trump’s appetite seems to know no bounds when it comes to McDonald’s, with a dinner order consisting of “two Big Macs, two Fillet-O-Fish, and a chocolate malted.”
[…]

In another episode, Lewandowski describes how staffer Sam Nunberg was purposely left behind at a McDonald’s because Nunberg’s special-order burger was taking too long. “Leave him,” Trump said. “Let’s go.” And they did.

Trump’s fast-food diet is a theme. “On Trump Force One there were four major food groups: McDonald’s, Kentucky Fried Chicken, pizza and Diet Coke,” the authors write.

The plane’s cupboards were stacked with Vienna Fingers, potato chips, pretzels and many packages of Oreos because Trump, a renowned germaphobe, would not eat from a previously opened package.

The book notes that “the orchestrating and timing of Mr. Trump’s meals was as important as any other aspect of his march to the presidency,” and describes the elaborate efforts that Lewandowski and other top aides went through to carefully time their delivery of hot fast food to Trump’s plane as he was departing his rallies.

No 71 year old who doesn’t exercise can eat like that and not look like Chris Christie. He’s not thin. But he’s doing something chemical to keep from being much heavier than he is. And that would contribute to his instability. Bigly.

Keep in mind that he never had a real physical and instead we depended on that weird Dr Feelgood’s word for it. We have no idea what the real state of his physical health is. His shaky mental health is obvious.

.

.

The problem of Bizarro World

The problem of Bizarro Worldby digby


Here’s a little thought from Dahlia Lithwick that will keep you up tonight
:

Like most people on the left, I have spent the past year putting great faith in the courts and legal institutions to act as a check on Donald Trump, maintaining this faith even as Trump fired career lawyers like James Comey and Sally Yates and replaced them with ideologues and thugs. And like most people on the left, I placed an enormous amount of confidence in Robert Mueller as the embodiment of the principle that Trump could not escape the oncoming steamroller of justice and legal liability. Even as we remained uncertain whether our political leaders were up to the task of sidelining the Trump train of destruction, we took solace in the fact that the last grown-ups in America were hard at work in the special counsel’s office. And no, they don’t spend their weekends on the golf course.

In recent weeks, and most especially in this past week, I’d begun to suspect that the forces of chaos and nihilism that stand against Mueller’s project might swallow whatever outcomes he produced. The shocking norm-and-truth defiance of the GOP tax bill, the refusal of the GOP leadership to criticize or even comprehend the enormous violence done by Trump’s anti-Muslim tweets, the president’s staggering support for the candidacy of Roy Moore, the silent Republican collusion to the seating of demonstrably unfit judges, and the virulence of the White House’s attacks on the press all contributed to a general sense that absolutely everything was broken and that Democrats had lost whatever momentum they had to halt this chaos.

In our ongoing national nightmare of creeping authoritarianism, we talk a good amount about normalization and the numbing effects of a barrage of shocking daily news. But I have also tried to be vigilant about all the ways in which magical thinking about law and lawyers—this is a nation of laws, not men, we’re told—can also numb us, and lead to a declining sense of agency or ownership.

Maybe it’s too late in the slide toward authoritarianism for any major legal outcome to change the game.
Democrats don’t like giving up on their institutions easily, and the Mueller investigation has served as both the best and the worst manifestation of that alluring Democratic reasonableness. So long as he is working away, filing documents and convening grand juries, nobody needs to take to the streets. But as the year has progressed, it’s become clear that absolutely nothing will persuade Trump supporters and Republicans in Congress that it’s time to disavow the president—not lying, not spilling state secrets, not abject failure in crisis management, and not openly performed corruption. Given that reality, it often feels like it wouldn’t be enough for Mueller to hand us a smoking gun and an indictment. What if they threw a conviction and nobody came?

It seems as though truth and law are forever losing ground in the footrace against open looting and overt totalitarianism. The more abjectly deranged Trump’s behavior and the more Republicans in Congress cover for him, the less likely it is that anything Mueller can magic up in his underground hall of justice will matter. Trump’s legal antagonists like to think that the next legal “tick, tick, tick, boom” will be the one that ends all this chaos. But with every passing day, as Trump escapes consequences and attacks the courts and the press, the chances that a “tick, tick, tick, boom” will be played off as #fakenews also increase.

I worry about this too. I don’t know what it would take for the GOP to turn on Trump and I think this base will stand with him no matter what, largely because they have basically been brainwashed. I don’t pretend that this couldn’t happen on the left as well, but right now it’s the right that’s living in unreality not the left. And as long as the GOP leadership are opportunists and cowards who both fear their ignorant base and use their ignorance as an excuse to reward their rich benefactors and destroy the safety net this isn’t going to change.

The problem is Bizarro World. Until that’s dealt with the only thing Democrats (and other sane people) can do is win on their own terms and be prepared to fight the other side. I don’t see how we can come to political consensus about anything as long as we are living in different realities.

Yeah, I worry. Bigly.

.

“An ally can turn….”

“An ally can turn….”by digby

So I’ve been wondering about that weird comment Trump made to the coast guard in which he said ” you never know about an ally – an ally can turn, you’re about to see …”
He was talking about Flynn:

Has he ‘turned on me,’ the president wondered about his former national security adviser. It appears Trump was right.

On Friday morning, President Donald Trump learned that his former national security adviser Michael Flynn had been charged with lying to the FBI by reportedly seeing news reports.

It was a shock but not necessarily a surprise.

For weeks, Trump has vented privately to advisers and confidants about his anxiety over signs that Flynn had flipped. He noted the possibility that Flynn had “turned on me,” three sources close to the president independently recall him saying. These sources had relayed details of these conversations to The Daily Beast over the course of the past week.

Trump’s fears came into sharp focus this past month, as several media outlets began to report that Flynn appeared to be cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

The president—an avid and voracious consumer of Twitter and cable news—began privately fuming, according to an administration official and two outside allies of Trump. Two of the three sources noted that it sounded at times as if Trump felt personally hurt by the prospect that someone whom he admired professionally and liked personally had potentially turned.

Sources said that President Trump’s flourish in his Thanksgiving speech to members of the U.S. Coast Guard—during which he said, “You never know about an ally. An ally can turn”—was intended as not-so-subtle jab at his former national security adviser.

I should have known that’s what he was talking about.

There are only two people he’s always been solicitous toward in public, never had a bad word to say: Flynn and Putin.

Update: Oh Trump you need to shut up

.

Trump has enough working digits to hold a pen and that’s all they really care about

Trump has enough working digits to hold a penby digby

Tom says it all about this bill, below. I’ll just add this:

Keep in mind that they still have to reconcile this bill with the House or the House will have to pass this monstrosity as is. Thee are a lot of blue state Republicans who are about to screw their own constituents with this thing. So, Californians and New Yorkers etc need to get on the horn to Representative in their state and let them know that they will be dogged for the rest of their days if they vote for this.

Grover Norquist warned everyone how this was going to go:

We are not auditioning for fearless leader. We don’t need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget. … We just need a president to sign this stuff. We don’t need someone to think it up or design it. The leadership now for the modern conservative movement for the next 20 years will be coming out of the House and the Senate. […]

Pick a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen to become president of the United States. This is a change for Republicans: the House and Senate doing the work with the president signing bills. His job is to be captain of the team, to sign the legislation that has already been prepared.”

The reason they felt they had to get this atrocity passed without even looking at it was so Trump would sign it before he starts nuclear war and they can die happy. They are the political equivalent of suicide bombers.

Update: They have at least one more trick up their sleeves:

High-ranking Republicans are hinting that, after their tax overhaul, the party intends to look at cutting spending on welfare, entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, and other parts of the social safety net.

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said recently that he wants Republicans to focus in 2018 on reducing spending on government programs. Last month, President Trump said welfare reform will “take place right after taxes, very soon, very shortly after taxes.”

As Republicans advocate spending cuts, they have frequently cited a need to reduce the national deficit while growing the economy.

“You also have to bring spending under control. And not discretionary spending. That isn’t the driver of our debt. The driver of our debt is the structure of Social Security and Medicare for future beneficiaries,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said this week.

While whipping votes for a GOP tax bill on Thursday, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) attacked “liberal programs” for the poor and said Congress needed to stop wasting Americans’ money.

“We’re spending ourselves into bankruptcy,” Hatch said. “Now, let’s just be honest about it: We’re in trouble. This country is in deep debt. You don’t help the poor by not solving the problems of debt, and you don’t help the poor by continually pushing more and more liberal programs through.”

The GOP tax bill currently under consideration in the Senate would increase the federal deficit by nearly $1.5 trillion over a decade, according to Congress’s official tax analysts and multiple other nonpartisan analysts. When economic growth the measure could create is included in the analysis, Congress’s official tax scorekeeper predicted the bill would add $1 trillion to the deficit over 10 years.

.

Tom Sawyer on steroids by @Bloggers RUs

Tom Sawyer on steroids
by Tom Sullivan

Sen. Jon Tester didn’t cuss. But the Montana Democrat might have after receiving the 500-page GOP tax bill hours before vote-a-rama and final passage last night (with no debate) about 2 a.m. Friday afternoon, Claire McCaskill (D-MO) tweeted a list of Manager’s Amendments she’d received from a lobbyist rather than from her Republican colleagues. “None of us have seen this list, but lobbyists have it.”

Republicans took two and a quarter centuries of constitutional process and set it alight so they could tell constituents over the holidays they had passed something this year without knowing exactly what.

The point was to get the tax bill voted through before anyone had a chance to find out what was really in it. But I had contacts inside the Capitol scrawl some choice lines from Leviticus 25 into the margins (the Bible is another text that goes unread up there): “The land must not be sold permanently, because the land is mine and you reside in my land as foreigners and strangers,” and “You must not lend them money at interest or sell them food at a profit.” Well, if someone actually had added that, no senator would know the difference.

Amidst the uncertainties, the bill’s passage will all but strangle the Obamacare program still in its crib. The Washington Post reports that’s not all:

And the bill makes other changes that reach far beyond the tax code itself. It repeals the individual mandate from the Affordable Care Act, a major change that was added in recent weeks as part of a broader GOP effort to dismantle the Obama-era law. The individual mandate creates penalties for many Americans who don’t have health insurance, but the repeal would leave 13 million more people uninsured. It authorizes oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. And by curtailing deductions for state and local taxes, it will put pressure on some state and local spending on education, transportation and public health programs.

On that, two words of advice for state governments: forced labor.

Axios has a bullet list of some of key items still to be worked out in committee:

  • The alternative minimum tax. At the last minute, the Senate bill kept the AMT on corporations. It also raised the exemption for the individual AMT, instead of repealing each. The House bill completely repeals both.
  • The SALT deduction. Both the House and the Senate limited the state and local tax deduction to a $10,000 deduction for property taxes. But some House members are likely to want more.
  • The pass-through rate. The Senate bill allows pass-through corporations (small businesses that file taxes on their owner’s return) to deduct 23 percent of business income, while the House created a 25 percent rate for business income (and a 9 percent rate for lower-income individuals).
  • ACA individual mandate. The Senate repeals it. The House doesn’t, although it has signaled that it’ll be kept in the bill in conference.
  • Estate tax. The House doubles the size of the estate tax exemption, then repeals the tax after 2024. The Senate doubles the exemption until the tax sunsets beginning in 2026.
  • Individual rates. The House has 4 rates and keeps the current top rate of 39.6 percent. The Senate has 7 rates and a top rate of 38.5 percent. There are also differences in the child tax credit value and the standard deduction, and everything on the individual side in the Senate sunsets beginning in 2026.
  • Mortgage interest deduction. The House lowers the cap to $500,000 while the Senate keeps it at $1 million.

Both chambers include a reduction of the corporate tax rate to 20 percent, so that’s a lock. After CEOs and board members stop guffawing over politicians’ promises cutting corporate taxes will lead to more hiring and higher salaries for workers, and after they figure out how they’ll divide the spoils among stock buybacks, dividends, and executive bonuses, they’ll set their tax attorneys to work figuring out how they can get their firms’ tax burden down to zero. Or lower. Metastasized capitalism won’t be satisfied until it kills its host, until We the People are paying the Owner class for making a profit. It’s already happening.

Kurt Eichenwald may be being overly dramatic, but not without cause. Dahlia Lithwick’s observations from prior to last night’s vote are the most sobering thing I’ve read. She worries in the “ongoing national nightmare of creeping authoritarianism” our faith in the rule of law may be so much magical thinking, or else not magical enough to save us from “the forces of chaos and nihilism“:

I’ve been thinking that America is operating along two parallel legal tracks. On one track is the chug-chug of law and order, as embodied in the Mueller investigation. On the other is the daily mayhem and denialism and circus-performing of the present White House. I tend to worry that with every passing day, the circus is training us to ignore, discredit, devalue, or disbelieve what’s happening on the other track. By the time the Mueller train gets to its final station, the norms that would ordinarily lead to impeachment proceedings might be tiny piles of yellow legal pad–shaped cinders. And then it really would be time to take to the streets.

For the past year I’ve been trying to understand what exactly the Trump era has been training us to become. Passive, certainly. Overwhelmed and anxious and unable to focus, without a doubt. But I also wonder whether we’re being trained to abandon our steadfast belief that the rule of law will save us, or if we’re being taught to cling to the illusory protections of the law as it becomes just another on a long list of anachronisms.

I wish I could be more optimistic this morning. There is only resolve. Or as Tony Stark said, “There’s the next mission, and nothing else.” Only Stark has more resources to work with than the rest of us.

* * * * * * * *

Request a copy of For The Win, my county-level election mechanics primer, at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

Friday Night Soother: the Valentino of Pandas

Friday Night Soother: the Valentino of Pandasby digby

Pan Pan, the wonder Panda

Karen Wille saw her panda friend for the last time in July 2016. He was in bad shape. He was skinny. His once-sleek black-and-white fur had dulled. Wille, a board member and volunteer with the nonprofit Pandas International, knew better than to expect wildlife-calendar perfection, airbrushed and coiffed. Even the most charismatic of megafauna have off days. Behind the big eyes and rounded frames that signal vulnerability and cuddliness to the human brain, pandas are real, live, 200-pound bears. Bears that can shred your flesh. Bears that roll around in the dirt and turn themselves dingy gray. Bears that grow old and frail. 

But it was still hard to see reality catching up to her friend. Wille had been to China to visit this specific bear many times before. This time, though, nobody wanted to talk much about how he was doing. His keepers were more protective than normal. Wille had about five minutes with him — enough time for a pat on the head and a carrot. She was heartbroken, but not surprised, when he died five months later. 

His name was Pan Pan. It translates to something like “hope,” an identity that likely meant one thing when he was an abandoned, sick cub on a Chinese mountainside and something very different later in his life. 

When he died from cancer on Dec. 28, 2016, the 31-year-old Pan Pan was the world’s panda paterfamilias: the oldest known living male and the panda (male or female) with the most genetic contribution to the species’ captive population. Today, there are 520 pandas living in research centers and zoos, mostly in China. Chinese officials say more than 130 of them are descendants of Pan Pan.

Pan Pan saved his species by being really, really, ridiculously good at sex. Before Pan Pan, experts thought that building up a stable population of captive pandas was going to require extensive use of artificial insemination. Pan Pan not only led the way on reproducing in captivity, he taught us that pandas were perfectly capable of doing it for themselves — and they’re now increasingly allowed to do so. Scientists say giant pandas represent, hands down, the most successful captive animal breeding program humans have ever embarked on, and, partly, we have Pan Pan to thank. He was a big, fluffy stud muffin, and he was beloved. “It sounds kind of weird,” Wille said of their first meeting in 2012. “Most people want to meet rock stars or movie stars. I wanted to meet Pan Pan. He was a legend.” 

Here he is:

Read the whole article if you would like a feel good story about one successful effort to save a precious animal from extinction.

.

To the victors belong the spoils

To the victors belong the spoilsby digby

The New Yorker subhed to their article about the hellscape of Rex Tillerson’s State Department is this:

Rex Tillerson’s vision as Secretary of State has been of a vastly diminished role for America in the world, and a more militarized one.

That’s Donald Trump’s vision too. He explicitly ran on it. I was freaking out about it. And yet a lot of people who should know better insisted he would be more likely to keep us out of war than Hillary Clinton.

He is a military imperialist. He wants to run tanks parades down the streets of American cities. He wants to add nuclear weapons to our arsenal. He wants to expand our already bloated military to unprecedented levels. He thinks that the way to deal with the world is to tell other countries what to do and if they don’t follow orders, bomb the shit out of them. He has said over and over again, “to the victors belong the spoils.” That’s who he is. That’s what the people who are working for him are attempting to put in place.

He’s so compromised, so ignorant and so over his head that enactment of his vision is impeded. But the GOP congress is happy to fund his outrageous military expansion. And across the executive branch, in particular the State Department, they are busy degrading every instrument of soft power the US has in the world from trade to diplomacy to the destruction of expertise. This vision could end up being accomplished in spite of Trump’s manifest ineptitude and corruption.

.

18 Days

18 Daysby digby

I thought it might be interesting to go back and look at exactly what Sally Yates said when she testified before congress just to refresh our memory about what was going on in those early days of the administration before Flynn was fired:

Yates said she had had “two in-person meetings and one phone call” with White House counsel Don McGahn in January about Flynn.

Yates explained that she called McGahn with “a very sensitive matter” that she needed to discuss with him in person. She and another career Justice Department official then traveled to the White House to meet with McGahn and one of his associates in his office, where she told them that there had been press accounts related to Flynn’s conduct that the DOJ “knew to be untrue.”

“We told them how we had this information, how we had acquired it, and how we knew it was untrue,” Yates recalled.

She continued: “We told them that the conduct Flynn had engaged in [speaking to Kislyak] was problematic in and of itself. We said that the vice president was entitled to know that the information he was giving the American people was not true. And we told him we were concerned that the American people had been misled about what General Flynn had done, and that we weren’t the only ones who knew about this.”

While he was vice president-elect, Pence insisted in an interview with CBS that Flynn and Kislyak “did not discuss anything having to do with the United States’ decision to expel diplomats or impose censure against Russia” — a statement that turned out to be untrue and that set off alarm bells at the Justice Department.

Yates said the Russians “also knew what Flynn had done, and that he had misled the vice president and others. This was a problem, because the Russians likely had proof of this information, which created a situation where he could be blackmailed by the Russians. We told them we were giving them this information so they could take action. McGahn asked me if Flynn should be fired. I said that wasn’t my call.”

Yates met with McGahn again on January 27, during which McGahn asked her why the DOJ cared if “one White House official lied to another.” He also wanted to know if the Department of Justice was pursuing a criminal case against Flynn, and expressed concern that firing Flynn could “interfere with the FBI taking action against” him. McGahn also asked Yates to see the DOJ’s evidence of Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak.

The FBI is investigating Flynn’s contact with Kislyak as part of its probe into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. The bureau interviewed Flynn about his conversations with Kislyak in January as part that probe, but Yates said she could not disclose “how Flynn did” in that interview because the investigation is ongoing.

Yates said that she called McGahn on January 30 — hours before she was fired by Trump for refusing to enforce his first immigration order — to tell him that he could come over to the DOJ to review the details of Flynn’s communication with Kislyak. She said she didn’t know if McGahn ever took the DOJ up on that offer, however, because she was fired shortly thereafter.

Yates told Democratic Sen. Chris Coons that, in the course of the meetings, “Mr. McGahn demonstrated that he understood that this was serious.” But she said she didn’t know if the White House took any additional steps to restrict Flynn’s access to sensitive or classified information.

“If they didn’t take any action, that would certainly be concerning,” Yates said.

Flynn was asked to resign roughly 18 days after Yates first warned McGahn about his conversations with Kislyak.

Democratic Sen. Al Franken asked if Yates had any idea why Trump did not fire Flynn immediately, but she replied that she could not comment.

That has always been the question in regards to this particular event. McGahn had to tell the president. And he did nothing. In his first psycho solo press conference he said:

As far as the general is concerned, when I first heard about it, I said, huh, that doesn’t sound wrong. My counsel came, Don McGahn, White House Counsel, and he told me, and I asked him, and he can speak very well for himself. He said he doesn’t think anything is wrong. You know, really didn’t think — really what happened after that — but he didn’t think anything was done wrong. I didn’t either, because I waited a period of time and thought about it. Well, I said I don’t see, to me, he was doing the job.

The information was provided by, who I don’t know, Sally Yates, and I was a little surprised because I said, “Doesn’t sound like he did anything wrong there,” but he did something wrong with respect to the Vice President, and I thought it was not acceptable as far as, as far as, the actual making the call. In fact, I’ve watched various programs, and I’ve read various articles where he was just doing his job. That was very normal.

You know, first everybody got excited because they thought he did something wrong. After they thought about it, it turned out he was just doing his job. So, and I do — and, by the way, with all of that being said, I do think he’s a fine man. Yes, John?

The “lying to Pence” thing is ridiculous, of course. Trump knew about it an he didn’t bother to correct Pence either, obviously.

Needless to say, this whole thing is just the tip of the iceberg. The cover up is going to be a very big deal. Trump was reported last night to have been speed dialing GOP Senators to try to get them to stop the investigation. They all chalked it up to Trump being a fucking moron and not understanding that he was behaving like a very guilty fucking moron. That looks worse than ever today and the fact that the news of those calls is leaking is significant. They are all trying to distance themselves from those calls.

The campaign interference portion of our program is still the big story. The reason Flynn’s plea on this particular charge is important is that if Trump and or Kushner ordered Flynn to call Kislyak he was saying “don’t get upset about these sanctions Obama imposed on Russia for helping us get elected. We’ll take care of it.”

That is not a good look.

And this is what Trump tweeted out the next day:

.