Skip to content

Month: February 2018

Controlling the narrative, they’re good at by @BloggersRUs

Controlling the narrative, they’re good at
by Tom Sullivan

Perhaps you saw them. The cluster of Dallas churchwomen dressed in black and shades of blonde told CNN that a year into the Trump presidency they are still thanking Jesus for making him their “precious president.” His alleged affair with a pornstar? Not a problem. Jesus forgives.

“He is doing the best job that we’ve ever seen,” says Peaches McGuire Coates. “So proud,” another chimes in.

The line between this group of dressed-alike, coiffed-alike Trump supporters and religious cult members is a soft-focused one. The behaviors of besuited Trump sycophants on Capitol Hill are no less fawning. They have left behind objectivity, personal integrity, and loyalties to the Constitution for a place at the master’s feet.

Obstruction of the Special Counsel Robert Mueller Russia investigation is happening before the world’s eyes. Trump’s acolytes not only are not lifting a finger to stop it, they are enabling it.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) is doing Trump’s bidding again. Nunes already discredited himself with unauthorized releases of classified material in his March 2017 attempt to peddle White House propaganda as an “unmasking” scandal. This time, he’s back with his already infamous, unreleased memo alleging improper surveillance and anti-Trump bias at the FBI.

The kind of people who erected hundreds of statues to whitewash the Civil War after the fact are now erecting an ediface of lies about the FBI to discredit the Mueller investigation before it completes and releases its findings.

Amanda Carpenter, former Ted Cruz communications director writes for Politico magazine:

We are being gaslit into believing that, supposedly, those investigating Trump’s ties to Russia are so biased and corrupt that nothing they produce should be believed. Every once in a while, the true aims of this narrative are revealed. Rep. Matt Gaetz, the freshly elected Republican congressman from Florida, let the truth slip. He told CNN’s Jake Tapper in between his hits on InfoWars with Alex Jones, that there is “tremendous bias that should stop this probe from going forward.”

Which, of course, is the real goal of this week’s Trump-Nunes effort. When fellow House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) asked Nunes if any of his staff had worked with the White House in preparing the memo, Nunes refused to answer.

FBI Director Christopher Wray took the extraordinary step Wednesday of issuing warnings the bureau had “grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.” Those, one top of warnings public release of the memo would exposed national security secrets.

Axios reports this morning:

Wednesday evening, Rep. Adam Schiff released a statement claiming the classified memo written by Rep. Devin Nunes and sent to the White House to be approved for public release included “material changes” from the version the House Intelligence Committee had approved.

Integrity is not a watchword for either Nunes or this administration.

It is all a grand distraction from the Russia inquiry which Trump has for over a year — criminally, perhaps — sought to quash, as well as to distract from White House obstruction of justice itself, something in which much of the Republican caucus has no qualms participating.

Paul Waldman writes at The Week:

There’s no argument here about the substance of the Russia scandal. All their efforts right now are geared toward discrediting the FBI, the Justice Department, the people who work for Robert Mueller, Mueller himself — essentially anyone who might be in a position to hold Trump accountable. The point is to delegitimize them all, so that whenever we get the full truth on the scandal, Trump can survive it.

None of which Trump’s cultish base cares about anyway. They’ll wave away extramarital affairs, money laundering, obstruction of justice, being in thrall to Russian oligarchs, maybe even videotape from a Moscow hotel room, which may yet turn up.

The same may have been true at this point in the Watergate investigation. It didn’t matter until it did. Whether that template still holds is in question.

“We care about jobs, we care about the economy, safety, that’s what we care about,” Gina O’Briant told CNN in Dallas.

Democrats would do well in this election year to remember that any message they may have about jobs, the economy, and safety is being buried by their own focus on Russia-gate. On those topics, as well as on the trajectory of the Russia investigation, Trump is their master too. He controls the narrative. It’s about the one things he’s good at.

* * * * * * * *

Request a copy of For The Win, my county-level election mechanics primer, at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

The gathering Summer Stormy

The gathering Summer Stormyby digby

The LA Times noticed a little pattern I haven’t seen before:

Some details of Daniels’ recollections in the In Touch Weekly interview appear to corroborate allegations of Summer Zervos, an Orange County woman who has sued Trump. She charged that he tried to force himself on her at the Beverly Hills Hotel in 2007, and then lied about it.
Daniels, in the In Touch transcript, and Zervos, in court documents, each said that Trump invited them to dinner, asked them to meet at his hotel room, ordered room service rather than going to a restaurant and tried to initiate sex in the room. Daniels said they had sex​​​; Zervos said she spurned Trump’s advances.

Both also recalled specifically visiting Trump’s suite in a bungalow at the Beverly Hills Hotel.
Zervos, a onetime contestant on Trump’s reality TV show “The Apprentice,” alleged a few weeks before Trump was elected president that he tried to sexually assault her in the bungalow. She was one of the women who went public with accusations of sexual misconduct by Trump in the days after disclosure of an “Access Hollywood” recording of him saying that he got away with grabbing women’s genitals without their consent because he was a celebrity.
Trump charged repeatedly in the campaign’s final weeks that Zervos and the other women were lying. He threatened to sue them after the election but has not followed through.
Zervos sued Trump a few days before his inauguration, saying he defamed her and the other women he branded as liars. Trump denies sexually assaulting Zervos and has asked a judge to dismiss the case.

.

Be kind … please rewind

Be kind … please rewindby Dennis Hartley

In lieu of ingesting some undoubtedly ill-advised form of self-medication, I kept my hands busy via furtive live Tweeting during President Donald J. Trump’s first State of the Union address last night. I concluded with this somewhat glum observation:

In an effort to cheer myself up this morning, I thought I’d mosey over to the War Room, see what’s going on there, and stumbled across a post I wrote last August, marking the 72nd anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing, In the preface to the piece, I wrote:

Every January, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists gives the human race its annual physical, to determine the official time on the Doomsday Clock (with midnight representing Armageddon). This past January, they moved the hands 30 seconds closer

“This already-threatening world situation was the backdrop for a rise in strident nationalism worldwide in 2016, including in a US presidential campaign during which the eventual victor, Donald Trump, made disturbing comments about the use and proliferation of nuclear weapons. […]
It is [now] two and a half minutes to midnight. The board’s decision to move the clock less than a full minute—something it has never before done—reflects a simple reality: As this statement is issued, Donald Trump has been the US president only a matter of days.” 

I needn’t remind you that 6 months on, Donald J. Trump continues to be President of the United States. Like the scientists said: The clock ticks. Global danger looms. And the Master of 3am Tweets has those nuclear codes. 

Good times.

Well, here we one year later at the end of January 2018, and bang on time (bad choice of words?)…The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has handed down their latest edict on the state of the Doomsday Clock.The news is not good:

The year just past proved perilous and chaotic, a year in which many of the risks foreshadowed in our last Clock statement came into full relief. In 2017, we saw reckless language in the nuclear realm heat up already dangerous situations and re-learned that minimizing evidence-based assessments regarding climate and other global challenges does not lead to better public policies 

Although the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists focuses on nuclear risk, climate change, and emerging technologies, the nuclear landscape takes center stage in this year’s Clock statement. Major nuclear actors are on the cusp of a new arms race, one that will be very expensive and will increase the likelihood of accidents and misperceptions [sic] . Across the globe, nuclear weapons are poised to become more rather than less usable because of nations’ investments in their nuclear arsenals. This is a concern that the Bulletin has been highlighting for some time, but momentum toward this new reality is increasing.Oh, god.

To call the world nuclear situation dire is to understate the danger—and its immediacy. […] 

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Science and Security Board believes the perilous world security situation just described would, in itself, justify moving the minute hand of the Doomsday Clock closer to midnight. 

But there has also been a breakdown in the international order that has been dangerously exacerbated by recent US actions. In 2017, the United States backed away from its long-standing leadership role in the world, reducing its commitment to seek common ground and undermining the overall effort toward solving pressing global governance challenges. Neither allies nor adversaries have been able to reliably predict US actions—or understand when US pronouncements are real, and when they are mere rhetoric. International diplomacy has been reduced to name-calling, giving it a surreal sense of unreality that makes the world security situation ever more threatening.

Holy shitsnacks. So what time is it now…exactly?

Because of the extraordinary danger of the current moment, the Science and Security Board today moves the minute hand of the Doomsday Clock 30 seconds closer to catastrophe. It is now two minutes to midnight—the closest the Clock has ever been to Doomsday, and as close as it was in 1953, at the height of the Cold War. 

The Science and Security Board hopes this resetting of the Clock will be interpreted exactly as it is meant—as an urgent warning of global danger. The time for world leaders to address looming nuclear danger and the continuing march of climate change is long past. The time for the citizens of the world to demand such action is now:

#rewindtheDoomsdayClock.

#What they said.

In the meantime, please enjoy this relaxing music.

.