Skip to content

Month: April 2018

If Broidy isn’t Cohen’s client for the hush agreement then who was?

by digby

Oh this is interesting. Michael Avanatti appeared on Morning Joe and said something I haven’t heard before:

“So, Mika, you are familiar with the fact that a week ago, Judge (Kimba) Wood ordered Michael Cohen’s attorneys to disclose all of his clients for the last three years,” Avenatti said, “and there were three clients listed — three clients listed. Do you recall which three?”

Brzezinski listed Trump, Fox News host Sean Hannity and Republican donor Elliott Broidy — but Avenatti said she was making the same mistake everyone else had.

“No, no, no,” he said. “Mr. Trump, the Trump organization and Sean Hannity. Mr. Broidy was not disclosed in open court as one of Michael Cohen’s clients.”

Co-host Joe Scarborough asked the attorney what that meant.

“I think at some point we are going to find out, if in fact, the client in connection with the ($1.6 million) settlement was, in fact, Mr. Broidy. I’m going to leave it at that.”

Avenatti wouldn’t say it, but the implication seems clear.

Cohen negotiated a $1.6 million hush money payment to a Playboy model who became pregnant during an affair and then had an abortion.

News reports had identified Broidy as the client who agreed to pay the woman in installments over two years if she agreed to remain silent about the relationship — but Avenatti said Cohen’s lawyers ruled him out in open court.

Hookay. So, was it Trump or Hannity?

Update: Apparently, Broidy was named in the filing but not open court. I don’t know how that affects Avenatti’s supposition.

.

Your president, ladies and gentlemen

Your president, ladies and gentlemen

by digby

On Kanye and history:

‘He has good taste,’ the president said during his wide-ranging call-in Thursday morning to Fox & Friends. ‘You know, I have known Kanye a little bit. And I get along with Kanye.’

Trump explained that he believed West was impressed with his record on black, Latino and even female unemployment, reminding the Fox & Friends co-hosts how he would tell African-American voters at rallies ‘What do you have to lose?’

‘He sees that stuff and he’s smart,’ Trump continued. ‘And he says, “Trump is doing a much better job than the Democrats did,”‘ the president added.

The president was then asked if Republicans had done a bad job trying to court black voters.

‘You know, I think it was just a custom, people don’t realize, if you go back to the Civil War, it was the Republicans who really did the thing,’ Trump said. ‘Lincoln was a Republican.’

‘Somehow it changed over the years and I will say, I really believe it’s changing back,‘ he added.

Offered without comment. Just a primal scream.

Highlights of the morning crazy

Highlights of the morning crazy

by digby

Trump called in to Fox and Friends this morning and it was wild. He seems to have had a whole lot of sugar and Diet Coke (or something.) He was wound up, to say the least:

From one perspective it’s one guy’s word against the other. The problem for Trump is that the space-time continuum being what it is, it’s not at all clear how Comey would know to make this up in contemporaneous memos written in early 2017. He would have no way to know it would be significant. It simply makes no sense. There does appear to be at least one witness, Reince Priebus. It will be interesting to see what he says.

I think Reince Priebus was a witness to at least one of the comments. Will he lie for Trump?

He had not admitted that Cohen repped him for Stormy before. And he knows plenty about Trump’s businesses, which is the real question…

Drain the swamp? Lol.

Drain the swamp?  Lol.


by digby

I wrote about corruption, Pruitt,Mulvaney, Trump etc etc — for Salon this morning:

Donald Trump has a habit of stealing slogans and then insisting he made them up.The most obvious is “Make American Great Again” which he blatantly stole from the 1980 Reagan campaign. (He claims he came up with it independently.) When he called himself the “law and order” candidate, he probably didn’t realize that he was lifting the slogan from Richard Nixon, who used it as one of the all-time effective racist dog whistles. Trump just knows one when he hears it. “America First” goes all the way back to the late 1930s and referred to the isolationist movement that protested any American involvement in the European war against Hitler.

Trump’s not the most original guy in the world. But he does have a knack for picking up slogans that have a certain political resonance even if he’s completely clueless about why. All of those make sense for a conservative candidate. But he may have gone too far when he chose “drain the swamp.” That one has been in the political lexicon for centuries, most recently deployed by Nancy Pelosi back in 2006 when the Democrats ran their successful “culture of corruption” campaign. And it may very well be the one old slogan he should have left on the shelf.

When Trump started using the phrase, journalists just assumed he meant that he was saying he would root out all the lobbying and revolving door forms of legalized corruption because that’s traditionally what the phrase has meant. And truthfully, when he introduced the slogan in October of 2016, he also introduced a set of ethics reforms:

Reinstate a five-year ban to prevent executive branch officials from lobbying after they leave office and prevent an executive action from lifting it.

Introduce a similar five-year ban on former members of Congress from lobbying after ending government service.

Expand the definition of lobbyists and close loopholes that allow former government officials to label themselves as consultants and advisers.

Lifetime ban on senior executive branch officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.

Campaign finance reform that prevents registered foreign lobbyists from raising money in American elections and politics.

I’m going to guess you didn’t remember any of that and that’s because it’s pretty much the last you ever heard of them. But he didn’t ever stop saying he was going to “drain the swamp” and his voters never stopped chanting it and cheering for it. And that’s because it came to mean something quite different and I suspect it’s what he meant all along: he was promising to drain the government swamp of political opposition, not corruption. In fact, you can say “lock her up” and “drain the swamp” in the same breath.

Congressional Republicans have never had the slightest appetite for cleaning up corruption. In recent years they pretty much institutionalized it. This Sunlight Foundation website which tracks Trump’s overwhelming personal conflicts of interest show that since he took office it has now become a free-for-all of graft and corruption at the highest level. And his administration isn’t even trying to hide it.

The White House Budget Director and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau chief Mick Mulvaney gave a speech to a group of bankers and basically told them they had to pay to play, right out in the open. According to the Washington Post he said:

“We had a hierarchy in my office in Congress,” said Mulvaney, who was a leading conservative in the House until President Trump tapped him to be the White House budget director, a job he still holds. “If you were a lobbyist who never gave us money, I didn’t talk to you. If you were a lobbyist who gave us money, I might talk to you.”

He did add that he would always talk to constituents too which is nice.

Mulvaney was basically laying out the terms of a bribe. If you want favorable banking legislation, you’re going to need to put up some cash. It doesn’t get any starker than that. The fact that this is the man in charge of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (which he loathes and wants to shut down) is just too perfect.

That’s just the latest in a string of such stories in the Trump administration and it’s only bee 15 months since the inauguration. Setting aside those pertaining to the president and his family, the cabinet is setting records for corruption scandals. Starting with Trump’s first HHS secretary Tom Price who spent more than $1 million of taxpayer funds on his own travel in private jet in the first few months, to Treasury secretary Steve Mnuchin who tried to commandeer government aircraft for his honeymoon and is still spending vast sums on travel and expenses and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke who is also dinging taxpyers for expensive travel and wanted to spend $139,000 on a couple of office doors and HUD secretary Ben Carson who is completely asleep at the wheel but nonetheless found the energy to order a $39,000 table, blame it on his wife and then belatedly admit that he was involved after all.

But for all that, there is one cabinet member who puts all the others to shame when it comes to corrupt practices. That would be the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt. From his bizarre requirement for a vast security detail and first class travel ostensibly for his protection and an expensive sound proof booth in his office to sweetheart deals with lobbyists and donors and excessive pay raises for his favored underlings it seems there’s a new scandal every day. But his agency is efficiently deploying a wrecking ball to the environmental regulatory apparatus so he’s had some protection from the GOP’s wealthy owners, at least up until now.

But the word is that the bad news is starting to look like a liability even to these brazen Republicans. According to the Washington Post, a number of elected officials are starting to get uncomfortable with him. He’s scheduled to appear before two House Committees today and the word is that some members of the White House are hoping he flames out:

Inside the White House, the EPA chief has lost the backing of many senior aides, including Chief of Staff John F. Kelly, and communications officials, lawyers and Cabinet affairs officials, whose calls he ignores. He is not interested in “turning the page,” as one senior administration official put it Wednesday.

The New York Times reports that Pruitt has a strategy all worked out. He’s obviously learned from the master. He plans to blame everyone but himself. That’s exactly what President Trump would do. And then he’d brag about his grand success at draining the swamp.

“We haven’t seen anything like this—anything like this,” says Norman Ornstein, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. “If you lined [Trump’s cabinet] all up and just took a random poke, you’d be far more likely than not to hit somebody who has engaged in some corrupt practices, or practices that have violated every norm that we have about how you use taxpayer dollars.”

Three meals from the jungle by @BloggersRUs

Three meals from the jungle
by Tom Sullivan


Public lynching image via eji.org

“Man is never more than three meals away from the jungle” (or some variant) is a line I heard once, somewhere long ago, and it never left me. I’ve not been able to find its source again for years of looking.* It speaks to civilization being the thinnest of veneers, like Man’s eye-blink history on planet Earth. The frightening truth is the jungle sometimes is a lot closer than three meals away.

This morning in Montgomery, Alabama, the National Memorial for Peace and Justice opens on a site overlooking the Alabama State Capitol. Inspired by the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin and the Apartheid Museum in Johannesburg, this one remembers the victims of white supremacy, including those who died in over 4,000 lynchings.

The New York Times:

At the center is a grim cloister, a walkway with 800 weathered steel columns, all hanging from a roof. Etched on each column is the name of an American county and the people who were lynched there, most listed by name, many simply as “unknown.” The columns meet you first at eye level, like the headstones that lynching victims were rarely given. But as you walk, the floor steadily descends; by the end, the columns are all dangling above, leaving you in the position of the callous spectators in old photographs of public lynchings.

The magnitude of the killing is harrowing, all the more so when paired with the circumstances of individual lynchings, some described in brief summaries along the walk: Parks Banks, lynched in Mississippi in 1922 for carrying a photograph of a white woman; Caleb Gadly, hanged in Kentucky in 1894 for “walking behind the wife of his white employer”; Mary Turner, who after denouncing her husband’s lynching by a rampaging white mob, was hung upside down, burned and then sliced open so that her unborn child fell to the ground.

No doubt the perpetrators left the jungle for a home-cooked meal afterwards.

The museum recounts story after story of black men and women taken by the jungle in the blink of an eye. Violating the unwritten white supremacist code was deadly:

Lynching emerged as a vicious tool of racial control in the South after the Civil War, as a way to reestablish white supremacy and suppress black civil rights. At the end of the 19th century, Southern lynch mobs targeted and terrorized African Americans with impunity.

Lynching of African Americans was terrorism, a widely supported phenomenon used to enforce racial subordination and segregation. Lynchings were violent and public events that traumatized black people throughout the country and were largely tolerated by state and federal officials. This was not “frontier justice” carried out by a few marginalized vigilantes or extremists. Instead, many African Americans who were never accused of any crime were tortured and murdered in front of picnicking spectators (including elected officials and prominent citizens) for bumping into a white person, or wearing their military uniforms after World War I, or not using the appropriate title when addressing a white person. People who participated in lynchings were celebrated and acted with impunity, purchasing victims’ body parts as souvenirs and posing for photographs with hanging corpses to mail to loved ones as postcards.

Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, leads the nonprofit organization behind the memorial. EJI’s mission encompasses “ending mass incarceration and excessive punishment in the United States, to challenging racial and economic injustice, and to protecting basic human rights for the most vulnerable people in American society.”

“I’m not interested in talking about America’s history because I want to punish America,” Stevenson explains. “I want to liberate America.”

The Times account continues:

Mr. Stevenson, whose great-grandparents were slaves in Virginia, has written about “just mercy,” the belief that those who have committed serious wrongs should be allowed a chance at redemption. It is a conviction he has spent a career arguing for on behalf of clients, and he believes it is true even for the white America whose brutality is chronicled by the memorial.

“If I believe that each of us is more than the worst thing he’s ever done,” he said, “I have to believe that for everybody.”

How much of the South’s fixation on others’ sin and damnation is simply ingrained projection, the sublimation of its own legacy of brutality? Indeed, slavery itself has undergone a series of transformations, sublimated beneath a veneer of equality. The museum is testimony, Campbell Robertson writes for the Times, that “the slavery system did not end but evolved: from the family-shattering domestic slave trade to the decades of lynching terror, to the suffocating segregation of Jim Crow to the age of mass incarceration in which we now live.”

As if on cue, Think Progress reports this morning The Green Book is back.

* If you should happen to know the source of the quote, please contact me at the address in the sidebar.

* * * * * * * *

For The Win 2018 is ready for download. Request a copy of my county-level election mechanics primer at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

Swamp water cocktail

Swamp water cocktail

by digby

I don’t know that I’ve ever seen anyone anywhere, much less the man who supposedly runs the Consumer Protection Financial Bureau, say it quite this blatantly before. But here is the White House Budget chief and director of the CFPB openly soliciting bribes:

Mick Mulvaney, interim head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, told banking executives Tuesday that as a South Carolina congressman he always met with constituents. But he never met with out-of-town lobbyists, he said, unless they gave him campaign money — explaining why the bankers should push their agenda on Capitol Hill.

“We had a hierarchy in my office in Congress,” said Mulvaney, who was a leading conservative in the House until President Trump tapped him as his budget director, a job he still holds. “If you were a lobbyist who never gave us money, I didn’t talk to you. If you were a lobbyist who gave us money, I might talk to you.”

Still, he said, the priority was given to local constituents. “If you came from back home and sat in my lobby, I talk to you without exception, regardless of the financial contributions,” Mulvaney said in his address to the American Bankers Association, according to a transcript provided by the CFPB.

It’s nice that he talked to his constituents. That makes it all ok:

Asked about the comments, John Czwartacki, a spokesman for Mr. Mulvaney, said: “He was making the point that hearing from people back home is vital to our democratic process and the most important thing our representatives can do. It’s more important than lobbyists and it’s more important than money.”

I don’t know why I’m surprised. Every oast trump official is corrupt. It goes without saying.
He went before a bankers group and told them to give him money if they wanted him to do their bidding. It couldn’t be more clear. That he also says congressmen listen to their constituents doesn’t change that.

Recall how our president described this process:

“As a businessman and a very substantial donor to very important people, when you give, they do whatever the hell you want them to do,” Trump told the Wall Street Journal in 2015. “As a businessman, I need that.”

He was asked about that quote during a GOP primary debate. “You better believe it,” Trump replied. “I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And you know what? When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them. They are there for me.”

I think people mistakenly thought that when he said he was going to drain the swamp he meant that he would put a stop to this practice. That’s not the case. He meant that he would stop the Democratic agenda, political correctness, giving money to black people, letting Mexicans and Muslims in the country. That’s certainly what his followers thought. They voted for him largely because of his corruption not in spite of it. As he put it himself when challenged about not paying any taxes: “that makes me smart.”

This is what they like about these guys. They are rich aren’t they?

.

Live by the braindead celebrity, die by the braindead celebrity

Live by the braindead celebrity, die by the braindead celebrity

by digby

Kanye West has already fulfilled at least one current job requirement for being president of the United States — producing tweets that provoke confusion and controversy among the American public. But West still hasn’t cracked one essential measure of support: An endorsement from a member of Congress.

“Rappers are not normally in the sweet spot for my endorsement,” House Freedom Caucus chairman Mark Meadows told THE WEEKLY STANDARD on Wednesday morning.

And Florida Republican Brian Mast responded with a firm “no” when asked if the rapper had his vote. “I’ve never been a fan of most of the things that I hear come out of his mouth,” Mast explained. But the congressman added that Americans from all walks of life can run for office: “That’s the system that we have. Nobody is born into this.”

“Maybe he’ll go out there and show that he has some great things and some great ideas and some great leadership to offer. But I’m not going to hold my breath,” said Mast.

Buried in a series of vague posts ranging from missives on love, his deal with Adidas, and upcoming music, West on Tuesday night reaffirmed his plans to run for president in 2024. He has also been vocally supportive of President Trump and policies that lean to the right.

I thought the Democrats were going to be saddled with having to deal with people making fun of this guy. Looks like he’s GOP for real. He is very wealthy, but the black thing might be a bit of a problem.

He’s a whole lot like Trump, you have to admit.

In case you were wondering:

Politics of the hat

Politics of the hat

by digby

Adele Stan talks about Melania’s hat — and some other news:

News outlets were no doubt grateful for something elegant and surprising to adorn their front pages or lead their broadcasts. Because under Trump, the news is ugly pretty much all of the time. And much of that ugliness is the kind of thing done to prime a population to accede to a coming crackdown.

For instance, it’s been a very busy month for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) bureau at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Raids across the country altered the make-up of big-city neighborhoods and small rural towns. In Tennessee, ICE raided a meatpacking plant, rounding up 97 undocumented immigrants. The following day, 530 children were absent from school in Hamblen County, which has a large Latinix community, according to The New Yorker’s Jonathan Blitzer.

Trump supporters are cheering, of course. They don’t see how the apparatus now strengthened for the round-up of workers can be set upon any category of people, including themselves. Their Great White Father wound never do such things to them, they believe. But those brown people who are changing American culture, well, you know, they deserve it.

And Melania wore a white hat.

Meanwhile, Jeff Sessions, Trump’s beleaguered attorney general, is well along the path to revoking any shred of civil rights afforded Americans while engaging with law enforcement. From the start, Sessions sent a message when he said he would loosen Justice Department oversight of police departments known as violators of the rights of citizens, especially black and brown citizens.

Americans inside law enforcement and out heard the message. In Sacramento, Stephon Clark was gunned down in his grandmother’s backyard earlier this month by police officers who suspected him of breaking a car window. Two black men were arrested in Philadelphia for refusing to buy something while waiting there for a friend. On April 22, Chikesia Clemons,a black woman was thrown to the floor of a Waffle House in Alabama for disputing the restaurant’s demand that she pay for a plastic spoon. That same day, a black man, James Shaw Jr., heroically wrested an assault rifle from a white man who had already killed four people of color in a Waffle House in Tennessee. The white man had ties to the far-right “sovereign citizen” movement.

The president has yet to mention the incident, or to hail Shaw as a hero. Might upset the base, you see.

How ‘bout that white hat on Melania?

The intimation of the media by the Trump administration—and the co-option of Trump and key large right-wing outlets—barely cause a ripple anymore. Yet this story is not simply about mean tweets.

In early April, we learned that the Department of Homeland security is building a database of journalists. From Bloomberg Government:

DHS wants to track more than 290,000 global news sources, including online, print, broadcast, cable, and radio, as well as trade and industry publications, local, national and international outlets, and social media, according to the documents.

According to the request for proposals, Bloomberg reports, “Services shall provide media comparison tools, design and rebranding tools, communication tools, and the ability to identify top media influencers.” The ideological bent of each publication will be identified, and the public activities of top influencers monitored.

[…]

Our media landscape is changing in ways that smack of authoritarianism and corruption. But don’t look too closely. Did you get a load of that hat on Melania?

There’s more. There’s much, much more. Stan is seeing the forest, not the trees, something which far too few of our journalistic brethren are seeing or are willing to admit if they do. Read on.

Update: This woman is…horrible. She cannot just say “we support a free press.” And that’s because she and her authoritarian boss don’t. They consider the press to be “the enemey of the people”. They’ve said it out loud.

She’ll go down as the worst press secretary in history and that includes Ari Fleischer:

But hey … that hat.

Will Lesko win again in November?

Will Lesko win again in November?

by digby

It used to be that when a politician won an unexpectedly close election they would move a bit to the center, hoping that the large number of constituents who didn’t vote for them would be reassured and come around to vote for them in the next election. Republicans are no longer observing that sort of silliness. It’s scorched earth, winner take all, “suck it losers” for them:

Rep.-elect Debbie Lesko (R), who narrowly won a special election in Arizona Tuesday night, is expected to join the House Freedom Caucus after she is sworn in, the conservative group’s leader, Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) told The Hill.

Both Meadows and former Freedom Caucus Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) endorsed Lesko in her GOP primary earlier this year. And the Freedom Fund, the super PAC aligned with the Freedom Caucus, contributed to her campaign during the primary.

“We felt she was the best candidate in the 8th District of Arizona. We look forward to having her join our ranks as a strong contributing member of the Freedom Caucus when she gets sworn in as a new member of Congress,” Meadows said in a Wednesday morning phone interview.

“We have every expectation an invitation to join the caucus will be made and that she will gladly accept,” he added.

To join the roughly 30-member Freedom Caucus, a GOP lawmaker needs to be invited by the group; that only happens after a formal vote by the members.

And this woman is joining the most extremist far right group in the congress even though she has to run again in November!

They are living in their own world, all of them.

.