Skip to content

Month: July 2018

Trump’s Himmler

Trump’s Himmler

by digby


Oh dear God:

A Trump appointee’s decision to personally review requests to release migrant children from jail-like “secure facilities” created a bureaucratic bottleneck that dramatically increased the amount of time kids spent locked up.

Office of Refugee Resettlement chief E. Scott Lloyd ― who first attracted national interest when a federal court slapped down his attempt to ban a teenage migrant who’d been raped from obtaining an abortion ― told subordinates last year that he’d have to personally sign off before any kids could be released from ORR’s secure facilities.

As a result, hundreds of kids spent extra time in the jail-like facilities, which have been associated with far more allegations of abuse and mistreatment than the shelters and homestays that hold most of the children in ORR custody.

Over the past two years, migrant children in federal custody have been forcibly injected with psychotropic drugs at a Shiloh Residential Treatment Center outside Houston, according to court filings. (The psychiatrist responsible for prescribing the medications lost his board certification nearly a decade ago, according to Reveal.) Others were pepper-sprayed or locked in restraints with bags over their heads as punishment for misbehaving at Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Center in Virginia.

Lloyd decided to make release decisions himself after reading news reports that some unaccompanied minors released from ORR custody later allegedly committed gang-related crimes, he told a congressional subcommittee last year. In a deposition for a New York Civil Liberties Union lawsuit challenging his new policy, which a federal judge halted with an injunction last month, Lloyd said he made the decision without an agency review and in consultation with just two colleagues.

Release requests were subsequently delayed for months as they mounted on the desk of a single bureaucrat.

One of the plaintiffs in the NYCLU lawsuit, a 17-year-old boy who has not been publicly identified, spent eight months locked in a juvenile detention hall after his arrest on gang-related charges that were never proven. Though it lacked evidence of criminal activity to justify his incarceration, ORR cited the boy’s gang-related tattoos as one of the reasons for his extended detention. The boy has no tattoos, according to the NYCLU.

At least 700 children spent time in facilities with severe security restrictions because of the delay, the NYCLU says.

Lloyd’s decision to make his personal signature a requirement for release from these secured facilities isn’t an anomaly. It’s part of a pattern. With almost no experience working on immigration issues or child care, the low-level bureaucrat has unilaterally made sweeping changes at the agency, blocking minors’ abortions, keeping kids incarcerated longer and making it harder for parents to recover their kids.

Who is this evil bastard?

Lloyd had little immigration policy experience when President Donald Trump appointed him in March 2017. His only major immigration work, before he assumed control of an agency charged with helping tens of thousands of refugees, involved research and advocacy for Christians persecuted in Iraq, which he carried out as a policy worker with the Knights of Columbus and described in a 2016 CPAC panel titled “We Are All Infidels Now.” His support for Iraqi refugees put him at odds with the Trump administration’s first travel ban, which barred Iraqi nationals from entering the United States. (A later iteration removed Iraq from the list of restricted countries.)

Lloyd’s main policy experience before his appointment was in the fight against abortion rights. From 2009 to 2011, he worked at a Catholic law firm called LegalWorks Apostolate, run by prominent activists opposed to abortion, including the attorney Stuart Nolan. Lloyd sat on the board of the Front Royal Pregnancy Center, an organization that aims to dissuade women from terminating pregnancies. Some of his policy proposals were outside the mainstream of American politics: In a 2011 article for the blog Ethika Politika, he suggested that state lawmakers craft a law that would require women to gain consent from men before obtaining an abortion.

That background had little to do with immigration, but it seems to have appealed to Maggie Wynne, the anti-abortion leader whom Trump installed to transition the federal Department of Health and Human Services shortly after the 2016 election. Wynne recruited Lloyd to work at ORR, and he offered to direct the agency, according to the NYCLU deposition.

Lloyd, a father of seven, soon turned his anti-abortion politics into ORR policy. He denied abortions to six children in ORR custody, instead coaxing them to seek counseling at Christian-run pregnancy centers and requiring them to notify their families of the pregnancies, according to lawsuits. One of those women eventually received an abortion, and in April, a federal judge blocked Lloyd’s policy of requiring unaccompanied children in ORR custody to carry unwanted pregnancies to term.

Lloyd declined to be interviewed for this story. But in an email, Nolan described his former colleague as a victim of “character assassination” by critics and political opponents.

“In all the years I have known him, Scott Lloyd has displayed nothing but the highest integrity,” Nolan said. “He is a deeply compassionate person who is drawn to assist the most vulnerable among us.”

Advocates say Lloyd’s tightening of restrictions on release from ORR have had a dramatic impact on the children for whom the agency is responsible.

“Certainly under his leadership at ORR it’s been a disaster for children across the board,” said Brigitte Amiri, the American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who represented the minor in ORR custody seeking an abortion. “Not just with respect to abortion issues. He’s put his personal stamp on things.”

Under Lloyd, ORR’s mission as a human services agency is drifting toward one of more actively partnering with the immigration enforcement system, his critics argue.

“They’re turning ORR into a detention agency,” Bob Carey, who headed the agency during the Obama administration, told HuffPost. “It does not reflect the intent of Congress. They are not equipped to become a juvenile detention agency.”

U.S. law bars Immigration and Customs Enforcement from detaining unaccompanied migrant children who cross the border without authorization. Instead, immigration authorities must transfer them to ORR, which holds them in contracted shelters until the agency finds a sponsor to care for them ― usually a family member. The goal, according to a 1997 consent decree called the Flores Settlement, is to promptly release children.

Tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors have moved through the shelter system annually since 2014. But at any given time, the agency holds a few hundred children in more secured facilities ― whether because of alleged behavioral problems, criminal infractions or the need for ongoing psychiatric treatment.

Last June, after Lloyd decided his signature was necessary before any child could be released, ORR began requiring all children accused of gang affiliations to be placed in secured facilities, according to filings in the Flores lawsuit.

But ORR typically classifies children as gang affiliates based on the word of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In multiple lawsuits, judges later found that ORR had no evidence to classify several children in its custody as gang members, and did not consult with local law enforcement or put a process in place to appeal its decisions.

There’s more at the link.

I keep hearing that we should not be talking about fascism.

Yes we should.

.

Trump’s firewall is ablaze

Trump’s firewall is ablaze
by digby

In three politically important Midwest states — including two that were key in deciding the 2016 election — President Donald Trump’s job approval rating is below 40 percent, and Democrats hold a sizable lead for the upcoming congressional midterms, according to a trio of new NBC News/Marist polls.

In Michigan, which Trump won by nearly 11,000 votes, 36 percent of registered voters approve of the president’s job, while 54 percent disapprove.

In Wisconsin, which he won by about 23,000 votes, another 36 percent give Trump a thumbs up, with 52 percent giving him a thumbs down.

And in Minnesota, which Trump narrowly lost by 1.5 percentage points, his rating stands at 38 percent approve, 51 percent disapprove.

The Cohen threat

The Cohen threat

by digby

My Salon column today:

It’s been clear for some time that Michael Cohen is the most irritating thorn in President’s Trump’s side. Even though he’s suspected of colluding with the Russian government, his approval rating remains mired in the low 40s at best and he’s facing the prospect of losing at least one house of congress by January of next year, he’s always appeared to be most concerned about his former lawyer’s legal predicament and what that means for him.

When the warrants to search Cohen’s office and residence were first issued back in May, Trump flipped his lid in an infamous tirade for he TV cameras in front of the cabinet:

It was another of his frequent “l’etat c’est moi” moments in which he equates any actions against him personally with attacks on the United States of America. And ever since that happened Trump has seemed more off-balance than usual, bouncing frenetically all over the globe, trying desperately to change the subject whenever it comes up.

We don’t know what Cohen really has on Trump but it’s pretty clear that there is more to their relationship than what we’v e seen. And what we’ve seen is damning.

On Tuesday night Cohen’s lawyer and PR adviser gave CNN a tape of Cohen and Trump discussion the payment of hush money in the case of Karen McDougal, one of the women who claims to have had an affair with Donald Trump shortly after his current wife Melania gave birth to their son Barron.(The other is adult film actress Stormy Daniels.) When Trump got the nomination for president McDougal decided to tell her story and Trump, through his fixer Cohen, apparently arranged to have his friend David Pecker publisher of the National Enquirer buy her story for six figures and never publish it. The tape reveals what sounds like Trump and Cohen talking about how to reimburse Pecker for his troubles .

https://youtu.be/EBB9TcOGqTg

embed code:

Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s lawyer, suggested to Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Tuesday night that Trump said, “Don’t pay with cash” and insisted, “I don’t think anyone can suggest this [the recording] represents anything where the president did anything wrong.” Cohen’s lawyer Danis disagreed. He said, “listen to the tape, everyone. This is not a man shocked when Mr. Cohen said, we have to make payments.”

The chatter in the aftermath was all about what was said and what was meant by the “cash vs check” part of the conversation. But the real issue is that statement by Davis. Trump was clearly not shocked by the subject of hush money being paid through a third party (allegedly American Media, the publisher of the National Enquirer) to one of his former mistresses. In years gone by this alone would have sounded the death knell for a presidency solely on political grounds but Trump’s voters don’t care at all about his womanizing ways or the fact that he paid money to keep his mistresses quiet. Perhaps they believe that’s another example of his stable genius at work.

However, there are laws against someone paying hush money when they are running for office if they don’t properly report the expenditure. And there are laws against evading banking reporting requirements such as those that caught up former House Speaker Dennis Hastert when he was paying hush money to a former student whom he abused when he was a high school wrestling coach. The tenor of the taped conversation between Trump and Cohen clearly indicated that they knew they were doing something that was not on the up and up.

As Amanda Marcotte pointed out back in January, the most obvious parallel to the Trump payoff scheme is the John Edwards case in which the former Senator and Vice Presidential candidate was tried on felony charges of making illegal, unreported campaign contributions through some wealthy donors to pay for his mistress during his presidential run in 2008. He was acquitted on one charge, the jury was unable to agree on five others and the Justice department decided not to retry the case. Cohen’s lawyer Davis brought up the Edwards case himself to MSNBC’s Katy Tur, so it’s definitely something that’s on Cohen’s radar.

According to experts in campaign law, this case is much stronger than the Edwards case because of one thing: Michael Cohen. Ken Dilanian at NBC news spoke to Brett Kappel, a campaign finance expert with Akerman LLP. He said that he people who made the payments to Edwards’ mistress, Rielle Hunter, over the course of two years all claimed that their motive was to spare Edwards’ wife who was dying of cancer. The Trump payoff arrangements came much closer to the election. One of the participants appears to be ready to testify that that it was not about sparing personal embarrassment.There is at least one other woman who was paid off in the same period. And there are tapes.

Cohen seems poised to come clean. He is angry at Trump who, by all accounts, always treated him like a lackey and has been dismissive of him during his troubles, balking at paying legal fees and otherwise distancing himself publicly. More importantly, Cohen knows he is big trouble and that he going to have to save himself. It’s quite obvious that he’s going to cooperate.

It’s unclear why he and Davis think it’s in their best interest to go public but there seems to be a lot of maneuvering around the attorney client privilege issue so perhaps they know something we don’t. Nonetheless this is looking like a big problem for Trump. And the fact that he’s been acting even crazier than usual ever since Cohen was served with that search warrant lends credence to the idea that he knows Cohen has something very valuable to trade with the federal government.

Lanny Davis sent him a message on Tuesday night:

Cohen is trying to reset his life as not being Donald Trump’s bullet-taker, or worse, a punching bag for Donald Trump’s defense strategy where he takes the bullets. This is a turn for him. It’s a new resolve to tell the truth no matter what, even if it endangers him. He has more truth to tell. It’s unclear the impact of that truth but he has more to tell.

On Wednesday the White House took the unprecedented step of banning the reporter who was assigned to cover a Rose Garden event because she asked about the Cohen tapes. Trump must be very upset. I wonder why?

11 angry Republicans by @BloggersRUs

11 angry Republicans
by Tom Sullivan

“For what? Impeach him for what?”

Republican chairman of the House Oversight committee Trey Gowdy told CBS News on July 15 that if Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, a Donald Trump appointee, displeased the president, he could fire him with a tweet. House Freedom Caucus members led by Reps. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) had suggested impeaching Rosenstein over delays in producing documents to their oversight committee. Meadows alleges Rosenstein is “intentionally withholding embarrassing documents” in their investigation of the FBI’s surveillance of Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser.

Rosenstein also happens to be the one Department of Justice official whose removal could allow the sitting president and his defenders to quash the Mueller investigation into Russian criminal interference in the 2016 elections and any Trump campaign involvement.

Meadows and Jordan finally introduced articles of impeachment against Rosenstein on Wednesday. House Republicans used the Justice Department’s release over the weekend of a heavily redacted Page FISA warrant to bolster claims in the Devin Nunes memo that the FBI and DOJ improperly obtained warrants to surveil Page. Meadows’s North Carolina colleague, however, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, tells CNN he finds there were “sound reasons” for the Page surveillance.

“I don’t think I ever expressed that I thought the FISA application came up short,” Burr said.

Democrats on the House panel concurred, arguing that the redacted FISA application proves many claims made by Nunes were deceiving and false, and intended to undermine the Russia investigation.

But the Freedom Caucus needs to distract attention from the worst two weeks of presidential performance in memory. Their impeachment play looks like political grandstanding to provide cover for the sitting president. The Washington Post notes Meadows used a similar ploy in filing a resolution to unseat unseat John Boehner as speaker of the House. Meadows did not force a vote, but threatened to for months until Boehner resigned. Jordan and Freedom Caucus allies tried and failed to impeach IRS Commissioner John Koskinen in December 2016, employing similar accusations of “stonewalling Congress, obstructing justice, and breaching the public trust.”

Ed Kilgore explains:

It’s unclear how much support this maneuver has from other House Republicans, much less from Paul Ryan. One clue is that the articles of impeachment were introduced on the eve of a five-week House recess, and were not advanced as a “privileged motion” involving urgent House priorities that might have triggered a quick vote. On the other hand, it’s hard to imagine that they took this course of action without at least a tacit green light from the White House. It’s most likely that the whole gesture is just part of an effort to ratchet up the pressure on Rosenstein and DoJ to play along with their conspiracy theories, or perhaps to undermine Mueller by discrediting Rosenstein. Should Trump at some point decide to just get rid of the deputy AG, being able to say he was the target of a real live impeachment effort might be handy. It should go without saying that even if the House impeached Rosenstein, there’s no way the Senate would come up with the two-thirds margin necessary to make him the first non-presidential executive branch official since Ulysses Grant’s corrupt Secretary of War William Belknap to be removed from his position by Congress.

Calling it a stalling tactic, Senate Republicans object to Democrats’ request for stacks of documents relating to the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Meanwhile‎, writes Elliot Hannon at Slate, 11 angry Republicans in the House have filed articles of impeachment against Rosenstein, “not to get to the bottom of anything in particular” but to “muddy the water, create confusion, and false equivalencies that might serve the president.” For its part, the DOJ maintains it has worked to produce the volumes of documents lawmakers requested, even writing new software to search for them.

Just the latest installment of bad-faith politics from Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and the Freedom Caucus.

* * * * * * * * *

For The Win 2018 is ready for download. Request a copy of my county-level election mechanics primer at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

He’d better hope nobody tries to put up a statue

He’d better hope nobody tries to put up a statue

by digby

Donald Trump’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame has been destroyed—yes, again—after being smashed with a pickaxe overnight. KUTV’s Ron Bird tweeted a video from the scene showing the completely broken up the slab, which celebrated Trump’s work on The Apprentice. A picture tweeted by KPIX shows the broken star with a dropped pickaxe next to it, and another sent by by a KTLA journalist showed the star fully obliterated. NBC’s Jonathan Gonzalez reported: “Multiple people—including police—tell me a man walked up with a guitar case and pulled out the pick axe. Then, it’s believed, he called police himself to report it, but left the scene before they got here. Now, he’s nowhere to be found.” Trump’s star was previously vandalized in October 2016—but the damage from the new attack looks to be much more extensive.

That’s because he’s getting more and more unpopular …

Lulz:

.

Sure, this is fine

Sure, this is fine

by digby

Alex Jones is fomenting violence against Robert Mueller:

Infowars conspiracy theorist Alex Jones ramped up threats against special counsel Robert Mueller on Monday, calling him a “monster” and described shooting the former FBI Director.

Jones’ nearly 3-hour July 23 InfoWars broadcast ranged from rants about Hollywood pedophilia to social media “shadow bans” to outlandish allegations Mueller was personally involved in a child sex ring composed of left-leaning political figures.

The InfoWars host went on to illustrate a “real world” threat against the former Marine Corps officer and Vietnam War veteran currently in charge of the Russian interference investigation of the 2016 presidential election.

Jones took on a particularly insidious tone during his Monday show, accusing Mueller of violent child sex acts before dramatizing a hypothetical “wild west” shootout with Mueller, a Republican appointed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to lead the Russia investigation in May 2017.

While playing spaghetti western music riffing off The Good, the Bad and the Ugly theme song, Jones detailed how the only thing about Mueller that scares him is Jones “not manning up.”

“I’m constantly in fear that I’m not being a real man, and I’m not doing what it takes, and I’m not telling the truth. And so, call it whatever you want, I look at that guy, and he’s a sack of crap,” Jones said.

“It’s going to happen, we’re going to walk out in the square, politically, at high noon, and he’s going to find out whether he makes a move, man make the move first, and then it’s going to happen,” Jones said as he pantomimed shooting at Mueller.

“It’s not a joke. It’s not a game. It’s the real world. Politically. You’re going to get it, or I’m going to die trying, bitch. Get ready. We’re going to bang heads,” Jones continued, pretending to fire a gun at Mueller.

This man has millions and millions of followers. Trump has appeared on his show. Roger Stones is a regular.

.

Oh look, it turns out friends can be helpful

Oh look, it turns out friends can be helpful

by digby

It appears that Republicans are starting to see why their president acting like a cheap thug all over the world might not be the best way to run the most powerful nation on earth:

It’s not just trade. Even with national security it’s going to be a hundred times more difficult for the US to ask for help with say, intelligence or logistics, now that our president has shown that he can’t be trusted and will turn on them the minute he thinks it’s to his advantage.

This is a big problem. Perhaps people agree with Trump that the world will just have to fall at his feet and do what he orders but I’m not sure the US is that powerful — and the cost could be catastrophically high.

.

Shakedown Nation by tristero

Shakedown Nation 

by tristero

Why did Trump start a trade war? The answer seems to me blatantly obvious. The tariffs and trade war are basically a big shakedown aimed not at foreigners but at Americans.

It goes like this: the tariffs, by instituting an international trade war with our country, were intended to create hardship not only abroad but more importantly, in the US. This provides the Trump administration a splendid opportunity to offer “protection” to its loyal supporters. Protection could come in the form of exemption from the tariffs for specific business sectors or in the form of cash payoffs to offset the financial burden. A shakedown racket depends upon creating problems for those to be shaken down. And, as the hardships deepen, the protections Trump provides his supporters will become all that more valuable.

As for those who don’t support Trump? The administration can simply respond, “No can do. There’s a trade war going on. Blame Europe for your problems. Blame Obama for the lousy deals that forced us to institute tariffs in the first place. It’s not our fault.”

That’s it. The trade war really isn’t about international trade. Of course, if Trump can shake down some foreigners, too, hey, why not? But they’re not the primary marks for the grift. This is really about establishing Shakedown Nation, where supporters are openly protected and all other Americans face ruination. This is an attempt to accumulate and maintain political power here at home.

(Of course, the real beneficiaries are not the recipients of the “protection” but those providing the  “protection.” In this case, the benefits to the “protectors” — Trump officials — are both political power and money.)

The major challenge the Trump administration faces in creating Shakedown Nation is to properly calibrate the amount of protection. It’s essential that the protection never be complete, making those “protected” ever more desperate to prove their loyalty in order to get what they can from a too-small pool of goodies. But it’s also important that the protection not be so inadequate as to create an organized revolt.

That is exactly what we are seeing. As Zippy Duvall (Holy Dickens, Zippy Duvall???) of the American Farm Bureau Federation said in the article, “We are grateful for the administration’s recognition that farmers and ranchers needed positive news now, and this will buy us some time. This announcement is substantial, but we cannot overstate the dire consequences that farmers and ranchers are facing.” In other words, with $12 billion, the Trump administration hit the shakedown sweet spot perfectly. The article points out, the $12 billion offered to farmers is neither peanuts nor enough to mitigate the problems. The amount is intended to create a scrambling to prove loyalty to Trump. It looks like they may need to provide more down the road, but that will just spur more expressions of gratitude… and more desperate begging.

“But wait a doggone minute!” you might object, “They’re just not that smart. Everyone sees that this is a Trump-created problem in the first place! In fact, the article makes it very clear that Republicans are howling right and far right about the trade war and explicitly blaming Trump. There’s no plan at all, let alone for a shakedown. This is just Trump being his stupid self, out of his league, blundering into major serious trouble.” Here are two responses to this objection:

1. Attention-spans are short, the media are subverted, and the base loves Trump. In a month, all that recipients of the farm aid will see will be (some) cash handed out to them due to Donald Trump’s largesse. They will gullibly watch Fox News while propagandists falsely assert that Obama was really responsible for the trade war (and the mainstream media will carefully parse the effects of Trump’s grants on the Homeland). A large number of people will believe this. And congressional critics, facing Trump approval ratings among Republicans that hover between 85 and 90 fucking percent (!!), will shut up. Fast.

2. I never said they were smart. A shakedown racket is a really dumb idea that doesn’t work for very long. But if you’re dumb enough to think a shakedown is a good idea, you’d also be prone to thinking that a trade war with other nations is a terrific way to shake American businesses down.

Just as the separation of children from their mothers was both utterly immoral and fully intentional,* so  this trade war is utterly irresponsible and fully intentional. With immigration, the intent is to pander to Trump’s base by restricting immigration. Shutting borders by placing children in cages is an incredibly stupid away to go about that but that’s exactly what they did. With the trade war, the intent is to consolidate Trump’s power in the US by creating loyalty to the Trump administration. And setting up a protection racket is just about the dumbest way imaginable to try to do so, but that is exactly what they are doing. Yes, indeed, these are incredibly stupid people.

In mainstream coverage, there are hints that the media understand a little bit about Shakedown Nation. In the Times article, the reporters note, “Agriculture Department officials said farmers could begin signing up to receive the federal money in September, just weeks before voters go to the polls.” The coincidence is apparently not lost on the reporters. But journalists still insist on the charade of treating Trump’s actions as “policy choices” instead of the grifts they really are.

Crucially, the media fail to understand that the trade war is only incidentally about international relationships. It’s mostly about shoring up domestic support in the most thuggish way possible. Acting like a cheap crime boss in a bad remake of The Godfather is the only way Trump knows how to act. Before he’s done, we’ll be addressing him as Don Don.

*Rachel Maddow was quite right last month, that the Trump administration was counting on widespread outrage to publicize the caging of children. It was their way to send a signal to potential Hispanic immigrants (not Norwegian ones) that the Trump government is so incompetent you could literally lose your kid.

Schizo-fascism in full-effect

Schizo-fascism in full-effect

by digby

My Salon column today:

In the disorienting weeks right after the presidential election of 2016, Timothy Snyder of Yale University, a professor of European history and an expert on the Holocaust, wrote a viral facebook post about fascism. It was composed of 20 lessons from the 20th century and how to see them in the context of what had just happened. It was soon turned into a small book called “On Tyranny” which served as a handbook for Americans to defend their democratic institutions, resist the propaganda and most especially to think clearly and critically. He wrote, “you submit to tyranny when you renounce the difference between what you want to hear and what is actually the case.”

It was obvious from the beginning that Donald Trump was a fabulist and a liar and there seemed to be a shocking willingness among many Americans to roll with his alternate version of reality. Snyder’s little book was a strangely comforting message in those strange early days giving people a little bit of a roadmap as to how to approach these bizarre and unfamiliar circumstances.

I suspect those words have echoed in the minds of many people who read those words more than once over these last months. Yesterday, it came flooding back for me when I watched President Trump say in a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars,”just remember, what you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.” This prompted members of the audience to turn toward the media in the back of the hall and boo lustily.

Needless to say, millions of people who may not have read that book by Snyder certainly have read George Orwell’s “1984” and were reminded of this famous passage:

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

As Anderson Cooper pointed out:

Trump is getting more explicit about this command by the day .For instance, everyone who follows politics has seen the bit at the Helsinki press conference in which Jeff Mason of Reuters asked President Putin: “Did you want President Trump to win the election and did you direct any of your officials to help him do that?” Putin replied, “Yes, I did. Because he talked about bringing the U.S.-Russia relationship back to normal.” Rachel Maddow reported on Tuesday night that the White House has inexplicably omitted that part of the transcript and edited the accompanying video:

It’s a cliche to bring up old Soviet practices in these situations but in this case it’s just inescapable. The White Hpuse altered the part of the transcript and the video which shows Putin saying that he wanted President Trump to win. Just as the old USSR used to “erase” people’s pictures from official photographs and edit transcripts, the administration is doing a similar thing with their official record. It’s ridiculous, of course, because the actual tape is everywhere and millions of us saw it in real team.

Meanwhile, in the days since the Freedom of Information Act release of the FISA warrant for former Trump campaign official Carter Page, we’ve been subjected to one of the most “you can believe me or you can believe your lyin’ eyes” responses in history from right wing media and congrssional representatives. The facts as laid out in the documents are crystal clear: the FBI had been tracking Page for years and relied on numerous pieces of evidence to establish the probable cause to initiate surveillance of him, a month after he left the Trump campaign. They revealed all of this to the four judges who signed the successive warrants. Yet Republicans are still insisting that those facts do not exist and they continue to parrot their previous narrative, which Trump himself tweets out almost daily, that has the FBI lying to the judges and basing their suspicions entirely on the Steele Dossier which they assert proves the whole thing a partisan hit job. It’s maddening. The truth is there for anyone to see and yet they are simply declaring it is not.

Luckily, Senate Select Intelligence Committee Chair Richard Burr (R-NC) finally threw some cold water on this gaslighting extravaganza:

It’s unlikely it will stop the right wing media from pushing this propaganda for their followers but at least one Republican has validated reality in this story.

These are all “Orwellian” strategies and as disconcerting as they are they’re somewhat familiar. But the President laid out another in a tweet yesterday that is a bit less recognizable as a common strategy. He tweeted:

It’s almost as if he’s preparing to re-up his “the election is rigged” mantra from the 2016 campaign when he seemed very sure he was going to lose and was prepared to lead his “movement” to an insurrection after the fact. After having “erased” Putin’s admitted interference on his behalf, he’s now going to lay the groundwork to invalidate a Democratic “Blue Wave” as the work of the Russians on behalf of their true allies. It’s diabolical but it is also not unique.

Timothy Snyder’s new book is called “The Road to Unfreedom” lays out a technique perfected by none other than Vladimir Putin himself which Snyder calls “schizo-fascism.” He describes it as “actual fascists calling their opponents ‘fascists,’ blaming the Holocaust on the Jews, treating the Second World War as an argument for more violence.” It’s an exasperating “I know you are but what am I” tactic designed to frustrate and eventually wear down opponents.

And it can work.  We already see that there is a willing audience for these kinds of distortions and millions of people ready to take the cues from their president and pass them along. Snyder sees Trump as a sort of apprentice practitioner of these tactics but I’m not so sure. Unlike Putin he has little long range strategic vision and he is mostly just trying to bluff his way through one day at a time. But because he has been a reflexively dishonest hype artist for decades, whose public utterances pretty much just alternate between bragging and blaming, he’s more of a natural at this “schizo-fascist” style than Putin.

The problem for Trump is that he’s not very mentally organized and in his zeal to create an alternate narrative, he loses track of reality. The good news for Trump is that he has some very cynical, very powerful allies who can help him keep it all straight:

Up until now Mitch McConnell had virtually nothing to say about election interference.

Update:

.