Skip to content

Month: August 2018

Paging Frank Luntz by @BloggersRUs

Paging Frank Luntz
by Tom Sullivan

Somebody over there in Trumpland has stopped listening to their messaging guy:

Last week, NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch turned Capone into a verb to argue Trump is the victim of unfair prosecution.

“They’re trying to Al Capone the president,” she said on her NRATV show. “I mean, you remember. Capone didn’t go down for murder. Elliot Ness didn’t put him in for murder. He went in for tax fraud. Prosecutors didn’t care how he went down as long as he went down. The same goes for Democrats. Whatever avenue is needed to bring down the president, they’ll take it.”

Earlier this month, conservative radio host Mark Levin’s reported that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s impaneling of a grand jury for the Russia investigation is essentially a “coup” against the president. Conservative blog Right Wing News picked up Levin‘s comments, adding, “They are looking to catch these people in a process crime… Think Al Capone and the IRS. It’s a trap meant to take down the Trump Presidency.”

The conservative logic is clear: Trump is being slowly railroaded by various legal investigations—just like Al Capone.

Keep it up, kids.

If I may, check out this thread from Will Bunch on why we do what we do.

* * * * * * * * *

For The Win 2018 is ready for download. Request a copy of my county-level election mechanics primer at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

Grandpa googled and got confused

Grandpa googled and and got confused

by digby

Chief economic adviser Larry Kudlow said this morning that they’re looking into doing something about this.

If you’re wondering what that’s all about, it originated with a right wing PJ Media blog post:

The Daily Beast explains how it made its way to Trump:

The PJ Media story caught the eye of Fox Business pundit Lou Dobbs, who tweeted it at Trump on Sunday, and on Monday night ran a Fox Businesssegment on the story. The segment featured an interview with Diamond and Silk, the Trump promoters who falsely claimed that Facebook “censored” them without attempting to contact them. (Emails from Facebook reveal that the social media company made multiple attempts to reach the duo.)

Dobbs, Diamond, and Silk all have an ear with the president, who puts Dobbs on speakerphone for Oval Office meetings and repeatedly references Diamond and Silk segments in the White House, The Daily Beast previously reported.

During the Monday night Fox Business segment, Diamond and Silk likened the Google search results to lynching, telling Dobbs that “instead of using a noose, what they’re doing is using algorithms and a form of censorship to choke people’s platforms out, and to keep people from doing a search when they want to search for our beautiful president.”

Trump’s tweet appeared to reference the story, but implied a foggy understanding of how web searches work. Someone trying to find news about Trump by searching “Trump News” would be better served just Googling “Trump” or performing the search under Google’s News tab.

Conservatives have spent the past two years decrying what they claim is a concerted censorship campaign by Silicon Valley. Actual studies have revealed that social media companies like Facebook either show no evidence of political bias against conservatives, or that conservatives enjoy a larger platform than liberals on Facebook. But less-rigorous surveys, like one published this weekend on a conservative news site, have found their way to Trump’s television via Fox News, leading Trump to apparently threaten action against Google.

No one should be surprised that the King of the Birthers would grab on to any silly wingnut conspiracy theory for self-interested political purposes. But he is the president and it’s still bad.

This one is just an extension of the old “liberal media” playing the refs tactic. They are hoping to pressure the social media platforms the same way they have pressured the mainstream media for decades into bending over backwards to “prove” they aren’t being biased — and therefore, ending up being biased.

This is how “her emails” became an obsession at the New York Times — and hundreds of other such examples of the MSM desperately trying to prove they are fair by always second guessing whether they are being too “unfair” to the right and offering them enough of an edge to get away with murder. Trump is so extreme that they’ve been unable to be totally “fair ‘n balanced” but they do keep trying.

Here’s an example from today’s New York Times:

Good headline for Trump, right? He’s just taking matters into his own hands and fixing it like he promised. he even reiterated his promise that Mexico would pay for the wall.

Third paragraph in:

In other words this is all bullshit.

This relentless yelling at the media inevitably has an effect. They have never shown any real reluctance to fighting it. And I’d guess the social media platforms having no sense that they have a role to play in democracy or an obligation to society will be even more subject to it.

It will be very interesting to see how this goes.

Update: Greg Sargent sees another dimension to this. It’s even worse.

.
.

Mike Pence’s adoring gaze

Mike Pence’s adoring gaze

by digby

I’m sure this is true:

Michael D’Antonio, a CNN contributor and biographer who wrote “The Truth About Trump,” said in a new interview that Vice President Pence believes God is “calling him” to “function as a president-in-waiting.”

“Absolutely everything Mike Pence does is oriented toward him becoming president,” D’Antonio said during an appearance on CNN on Tuesday in promotion of his new book, “The Shadow President: The Truth About Mike Pence.”

Pence did not participate in the writing of the book or provide access to D’Antonio.

“His decision to accept Donald Trump’s offer to be his running mate — it even goes back much further,” D’Antonio claimed. “By the time he had left high school, he had decided that he was going to be president of the United States. … He thought God was calling him to, now, be vice president and function as a president-in-waiting.”

The author added that Pence has been “effective in this pursuit” by becoming a member of Congress, governor of Indiana and now vice president.

“We see Donald Trump in this huge crisis, this rolling chaos,” D’Antonio said. “And I think, with every day, Mike Pence imagines he’s one day closer to the Oval Office.”

When asked by CNN host John Berman if he believes the vice president is “maneuvering to get the top job” at the expense of Trump, D’Antonio also replied: “Oh, I think yes.”

“I think he’s positioning himself to be the normal guy — the guy you can trust,” D’Antonio continued, adding that though the vice president has been seen in recent weeks around the country promoting the president’s agenda, Pence is “really promoting the development of his own network.”

Here’s the problem:


No, a majority of Americans will never trust Trump’s most loyal lieutenant.

He (and all the other conservative evangelicals) have abdicated any and all claims to morality, principles or patriotism in their cultlike devotion to the depraved monster Donald Trump, something which will be used as a lethal weapon against him should he ever try to be elected in his own right. He’s politically dead whether he knows it or not.

.

Politics and Reality Radio: David Cay Johnston on Trump’s White-Collar Crime Syndicate | Study: Creationism Is Linked to Conspiracism

Politics and Reality Radio: David Cay Johnston on Trump’s White-Collar Crime Syndicate | Study: Creationism Is Linked to Conspiracism


with Joshua Holland

This week, we kick off the show with veteran journo David Cay Johnston, who has been covering Donald Trump since the 1980s. David helps us sort out what last week’s raft of convictions, guilty pleas and revelations about members of Trump’s inner circle being immunized by prosecutors can tell us about what’s likely to come of all this.

Then we’re joined by Stephan Lewandowsky, chair in cognitive psychology at the University of Bristol, to talk about new data suggesting that a belief in creationism is linked to a greater tendency to buy into kooky conspiracy theories.

Finally, as we look for glimmers of hope in these dark days, we catch up with Cliff Albright, co-founder of the Black Voters Matter Fund, on a three-day bus tour he and his colleagues took through the Deep South to help register voters and support local community groups. You can find out more about the group or support their efforts here.

Playlist:
George Ezra: “Shotgun”
Rancid: “Life Won’t Wait”
Rolling Stones: “She Smiled Sweetly”
John Lurie National Orchestra: “Let’s Get Ready to Rumba”

As always, you can also subscribe to the show on iTunes, Soundcloud or Podbean.

About the flag thing

About the flag thing

by digby

I hope nobody thinks Trump begrudgingly agreed to re-lower the flag to half staff and make a tepid tribute to John McCain yesterday because he felt any shame or contrition. He did it because Republican Senators were clearly upset about the controversy and he needs them to protect him from the Mueller probe.

That’s it. That’s all. But it does show one important thing: they have power to affect what this miscreant does. They just won’t use it for anything that isn’t self serving and personal to them.

They are just like Trump.

.

Accomplices

Accomplices

by digby

You’ve probably already seen this but just in case. Here is a list Republicans have compiled of all the presidential scandals they are aiding and abetting and covering up:

Congressional Republicans are getting ready for hell. Axios has obtained a spreadsheet that’s circulated through Republican circles on and off Capitol Hill — including at least one leadership office — that meticulously previews the investigations Democrats will likely launch if they flip the House.

Why this matters: Publicly, House Republicans are putting on a brave face about the midterms. But privately, they are scrambling to prepare for the worst. This document, which catalogs requests Democrats have alreadymade, is part of that effort.

It has churned Republican stomachs. Here are some of the probes it predicts:

  • President Trump’s tax returns
  • Trump family businesses — and whether they comply with the Constitution’s emoluments clause, including the Chinese trademark grant to the Trump Organization
  • Trump’s dealings with Russia, including the president’s preparation for his meeting with Vladimir Putin
  • The payment to Stephanie Clifford — a.k.a. Stormy Daniels
  • James Comey’s firing
  • Trump’s firing of U.S. attorneys
  • Trump’s proposed transgender ban for the military
  • Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s business dealings
  • White House staff’s personal email use
  • Cabinet secretary travel, office expenses, and other misused perks
  • Discussion of classified information at Mar-a-Lago
  • Jared Kushner’s ethics law compliance
  • Dismissal of members of the EPA board of scientific counselors
  • The travel ban
  • Family separation policy
  • Hurricane response in Puerto Rico
  • Election security and hacking attempts
  • White House security clearances

The spreadsheet — which I’m told originated in a senior House Republican office — catalogs more than 100 formal requests from House Democrats this Congress, spanning nearly every committee. 

The spreadsheet includes requests for administration officials to be grilled by committee staff, requests for hearings to obtain sworn testimony, efforts to seize communications about controversial policies and personnel decisions, and subpoena threats. 

These demands would turn the Trump White House into a 24/7 legal defense operation.

The bottom line: Thanks to their control of Congress, Republicans have blocked most of the Democrats’ investigative requests. But if the House flips, the GOP loses its power to stymie. Lawyers close to the White House tell me the Trump administration is nowhere near prepared for the investigatory onslaught that awaits them, and they consider it among the greatest threats to his presidency.

And there are new examples of corruption, malfeasance and betrayal every single day to add to their convenient documentation of their own abdication of duty.

.

Uhm, these people have a lot of guns

Uhm, these people have a lot of guns


by digby

This is the latest authoritarian rant from the NRA:

GRANT STINCHFIELD (HOST): The media is melting down over those caught up in legal battles with any association to the Trump campaign and President Trump himself. They yell things like this to him. 

[VIDEO CLIP] 

STINCHFIELD: The president ignores activists like this, just waiting to pounce. You hear them yelling who is he going to pardon. They want him destroyed. They want his administration and, in turn, America to fail just so they can say, “We told you so,” and elect a left-wing Democrat into office. Here’s how the president should answer those questions about who he will pardon. He should just yell back, “You should be asking for a pardon.”  

Reporters, editors, producers, anyone associated with the mainstream media should be asking for a pardon. They are the ones who have abused and even weaponized the First Amendment. When they try to actively destroy a country, to me that’s treasonous. But that is where the media is today. The reason they don’t ask for a pardon is because they know they won’t get it. For a few reasons. One, they’re guilty. They are enemies of the people because they’re trying to tear this nation up. Two, they show no signs of remorse, there’s no attempt to make up for any of their devious ways. And three, they know the president wouldn’t pardon the mainstream media. Not because he despises them, but because the American people who elected him wouldn’t stand for it.  

Finally, the mainstream media is being exposed as an un-American counterforce to everything that this country stands for. Maybe the media needs to ask for a pardon not from President Trump, but from the American people.

It’s only a matter of time …

.

What Joe Biden said: NC gerrymandering ruling by @BloggersRUs

What Joe Biden said: NC gerrymandering ruling
by Tom Sullivan


A federal court on Monday rejected NC congressional district map as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.

Here we go again. The GOP-led North Carolina state legislature spent yet another kangaroo special session Monday massaging — at a state court’s insistence — misleading ballot language describing two constitutional amendments that would strip power from Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat. Late in the day, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina ruled the congressional districts it had drawn in 2011 and redrew in 2016 — at a federal court’s insistence — were unconstitutional. Again.

Where the courts had found the earlier plan was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, the court ruled Monday the 2016 map constitutes an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.

The state is fairly evenly divided along party lines. Donald Trump narrowly defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016, but the state elected Democrats as governor and attorney general. Republicans who took control of the legislature in 2011, however, drew districts that secured 10 of the state’s 13 districts for the GOP. Those districts have been the subjects of lawsuits ever since. The combined cases in this ruling were brought by Common Cause, the North Carolina League of Women Voters, and others against the Republican legislators behind crafting the gerrymandered maps.

Hoisted on their own petards

The three-judge panel’s remedy to the GOP lawmakers’ “invidious partisanship” reads as though written by an exasperated Dean Wormer. The court gave the “Deltas” until 5 p.m. on August 31, 2018 to show cause why it should give them One. More. Chance. to use the flawed maps. Yet, after six years and three election cycles of denying the state’s voters constitutional representation, the court clearly doubts the legislature will put forth a good-faith effort this time and seems disinclined to give it one.

With primaries already settled, courts would not normally demand new maps this close to an election. But citing the “exceptional circumstance” of this case, Judge James J. Wynn and the panel may insist on new districts just over two months ahead of the mid-term elections.

In June this year, the lawmakers argued primary elections may not be needed for some partisan elections. Furthermore, the defendants argued to the Supreme Court at that time that altering state legislative districts (in dispute in a separate case) would cause “only minimal disruption to the ongoing election process” even with primaries already completed. Thus, Wynn argued, the legislature had already conceded imposition of an alternative plan would not be disruptive to an ongoing election. And with an injunction in place preventing printing ballots before the constitutional amendment language case is settled, Wynn sees no reason why new congressional districts could not be imposed on a recalcitrant legislature before November. The General Assembly may, if the court agrees, get until September 14 to produce them for court approval.

Since in the intervening months, “the General Assembly has enacted a number of pieces of election-related legislation that federal and state courts have struck down as unconstitutional,” Wynn has run out of patience. The Monday ruling permanently enjoins the state from conducting any more elections past 2018 under the current maps. Believing no good-faith efforts from the Deltas will be forthcoming, the court plans to backstop the General Assembly’s double-secret probation by appointing a special master to draw maps for them before September 17, drawing perhaps from “any one of the thousands of districting plans currently in the record.” The deadline for mailing absentee ballots for overseas and military voters is September 22. Early voting begins October 17.

National implications

The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled a state’s redistricting unconstitutional on partisan grounds. The New York Times explains:

The ruling sets up a delicate tactical question for the Supreme Court, which has never ruled a partisan gerrymander to be unconstitutional, passing up three separate opportunities to do so in its last term. With the retirement of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy at the end of July, the court is now divided between four conservatives who have expressed skepticism about the court’s ability to tinker with political maps, and four more liberal justices who have argued that it has that ability.

A 4-to-4 vote would leave the lower court’s ruling intact.

“All this because one party is terrified of allowing fair elections in the state of North Carolina,” Jeff Rose, chair of the Buncombe County Democratic Party, wrote in a Facebook post. The 2011 maps split Buncombe and the city of Asheville in the western mountains between NC-10 and 11, made NC-11 uncompetitive for Democrats, and Democrat Heath Shuler retired. Rep. Mark Meadows, leader of the House Freedom Caucus, has held the seat for Republicans since 2013. Maps that put Asheville back into NC-11 could put Meadows’s NC seat back in play in 2020.

A lot more districts could be in play across the country after the 2021 redistricting (if not before) if this ruling stands.

* * * * * * * * *

For The Win 2018 is ready for download. Request a copy of my county-level election mechanics primer at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

Today’s shitshow demonstration

Today’s shitshow demonstration

by digby

AQs hard as it is to believe, this is not a Veep episode or a Stephen Colbert sketch:

They are so bad at this …

Update: As someone did come up with the VEEP treatment

.