Skip to content

Month: August 2018

A Trump Republican

A Trump Republican

by digby

One of the admirable things about John McCain was that he wasn’t a whiner and didn’t blame others when he did the wrong thing. That used to be the way mature people behaved.

.

He’s their bad boy

He’s their bad boy

by digby

This piece by Republican Peter Wehner spells out what Trump has done to his party and the country. Unfortunately, most members of his party love the guy which means that they are, fundamentally, like him.

For decades, Republicans, and especially conservative Republicans, insisted that character counted in public life. They were particularly vocal about this during the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky scandal, arguing against “compartmentalization” — by which they meant overlooking moral turpitude in the Oval Office because you agree with the president’s policy agenda or because the economy is strong.

Senator Lindsey Graham, then in the House, went so far as to argue that “impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”

All that has changed with Mr. Trump as president. For Republicans, honor and integrity are now passé. We saw it again last week when the president’s longtime lawyer Michael Cohen — standing in court before a judge, under oath — implicated Mr. Trump in criminal activity, while his former campaign chairman was convicted in another courtroom on financial fraud charges. Most Republicans in Congress were either silent or came to Mr. Trump’s defense, which is how this tiresome drama now plays itself out.

It is a stunning turnabout. A party that once spoke with urgency and apparent conviction about the importance of ethical leadership — fidelity, honesty, honor, decency, good manners, setting a good example — has hitched its wagon to the most thoroughly and comprehensively corrupt individual who has ever been elected president. Some of the men who have been elected president have been unscrupulous in certain areas — infidelity, lying, dirty tricks, financial misdeeds — but we’ve never before had the full-spectrum corruption we see in the life of Donald Trump.

For many Republicans, this reality still hasn’t broken through. But facts that don’t penetrate the walls of an ideological silo are facts nonetheless. And the moral indictment against Mr. Trump is obvious and overwhelming. Corruption has been evident in Mr. Trump’s private and public life, in how he has treated his wives, in his business dealings and scams, in his pathological lying and cruelty, in his bullying and shamelessness, in his conspiracy-mongering and appeals to the darkest impulses of Americans. (Senator Bob Corker, a Republican, refers to the president’s race-based comments as a “base stimulator.”) Mr. Trump’s corruptions are ingrained, the result of a lifetime of habits. It was delusional to think he would change for the better once he became president.

Some of us who have been lifelong Republicans and previously served in Republican administrations held out a faint hope that our party would at some point say “Enough!”; that there would be some line Mr. Trump would cross, some boundary he would transgress, some norm he would shatter, some civic guardrail he would uproot, some action he would take, some scheme or scandal he would be involved in that would cause large numbers of Republicans to break with the president. No such luck. Mr. Trump’s corruptions have therefore become theirs. So far there’s been no bottom, and there may never be. It’s quite possible this should have been obvious to me much sooner than it was, that I was blinded to certain realities I should have recognized.

In any case, the Republican Party’s as-yet unbreakable attachment to Mr. Trump is coming at quite a cost. There is the rank hypocrisy, the squandered ability to venerate public character or criticize Democrats who lack it, and the damage to the white Evangelical movement, which has for the most part enthusiastically rallied to Mr. Trump and as a result has been largely discredited. There is also likely to be an electoral price to pay in November.

But the greatest damage is being done to our civic culture and our politics. Mr. Trump and the Republican Party are right now the chief emblem of corruption and cynicism in American political life, of an ethic of might makes right. Dehumanizing others is fashionable and truth is relative. (“Truth isn’t truth,” in the infamous words of Mr. Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani.) They are stripping politics of its high purpose and nobility.

That’s not all politics is; self-interest is always a factor. But if politics is only about power unbounded by morality — if it’s simply about rulers governing by the law of the jungle, about a prince acting like a beast, in the words of Machiavelli — then the whole enterprise will collapse. We have to distinguish between imperfect leaders and corrupt ones, and we need the vocabulary to do so.

A warning to my Republican friends: The worst is yet to come. Thanks to the work of Robert Mueller — a distinguished public servant, not the leader of a “group of Angry Democrat Thugs” — we are going to discover deeper and deeper layers to Mr. Trump’s corruption. When we do, I expect Mr. Trump will unravel further as he feels more cornered, more desperate, more enraged; his behavior will become ever more erratic, disordered and crazed.

Most Republicans, having thrown their MAGA hats over the Trump wall, will stay with him until the end. Was a tax cut, deregulation and court appointments really worth all this?

He also owns the libs and puts women and people of color in their place. And that is really what makes it all worthwhile:

WASHINGTON — After a week that saw President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman convicted on eight counts of fraud and his former lawyer plead guilty to felony campaign finance charges, the president’s job approval rating remains virtually unchanged, new polling from NBC News and the Wall Street Journal shows.

But the stability in Trump’s approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing special counsel investigation by Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pled guilty.

Between August 18th and August 22nd — the day after the news involving former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and former Trump attorney Michael Cohen — the president’s approval rating stood at 46 percent approve, 51 percent disapprove.

In a separate NBC/WSJ survey, conducted August 22nd through August 25th, Trump’s approval rating was 44 percent approve and 52 percent disapprove. That’s within the poll’s margin of error.

Republican pollster Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies, who conducted this survey with Democratic pollster Peter Hart and his team at Hart Research Associates, called Trump’s approval rating “remarkably stable” despite the Manafort and Cohen developments, both of which became public on the same afternoon last Tuesday.

I know it seems unbelievable but it looks like these people will stick with him no matter what.

If you ever wondered whether it can happen here, well …

.

The polarized world in which we live

The polarized world in which we live

by digby


Huffington Post
took an interesting snapshot of one interesting day of the news cycle last week:

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort was convicted of federal charges, and former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to charges in a separate federal case. The week was one of the worst of Trump’s presidency, with questions about how much he was involved in illegal campaign finance schemes.

Here’s how some journalists described the news: “almost surreal,” “all-consuming” and “even by the dizzying standards of the Trump-fueled news cycle … the most frenetic yet.”

And here’s how a 50-year-old California man saw it who said he spent a little under half an hour reading the paper and checking Facebook and Twitter: “Nothing special. Just a ho-hum day.”

Most Americans pay at least a little attention to current events, but they differ enormously in where they turn to get their news and which stories they pay attention to. To get a better sense of how a busy news cycle played out in homes across the country, we repeated an experiment, teaming up with YouGov to ask 1,000 people nationwide to describe their news consumption and respond to a simple prompt: “In your own words, please describe what you would say happened in the news on Tuesday.”

Some were raptly following the latest political developments. One person likened it to “binge-watching a fictional series on Netflix.” But only a quarter of those surveyed said they had paid a lot of attention to the news, and just 27 percent said Tuesday’s news cycle seemed much busier than usual. Many said, sometimes apologetically, that they had been dealing with more pressing demands. Some were busy with work or were dealing with medical issues. One woman was preoccupied battling an eviction from her home; another, after reading the morning paper, spent most of her day helping at a church food bank. A man in New York was camping and couldn’t get a TV signal.

Others were burned out, overwhelmed or uninterested or just didn’t trust the media. “I do not have a big understanding of politics,” another respondent wrote, “and there is so [much] bickering that sometimes I just turn the news off.”

But for many, the Manafort and Cohen stories still broke through. Of those polled who said they had paid any attention to the news and who were able to name at least one news story that happened on Tuesday, nearly three-quarters mentioned the guilty outcomes, making them by far the most-cited news stories.

But Americans’ interpretations of the stories varied widely, as did their levels of interest.

Many of Trump’s opponents were ecstatic (“I love this ‘witch hunt’ so much!” one said), but many of his supporters circled the wagons (“Liberal media glee at the news about Manafort and Cohen, even though Manafort had nothing to do with Trump and Cohen only slightly involved Trump,” one responded). Whereas some rattled off detailed summaries of the proceedings, others’ recollection was limited to, as one put it, “Someone important got convicted.”

And the Manafort and Cohen cases weren’t the only stories to attract attention. About 20 percent of those polled who were able to name at least one news story said they had followed other political topics, including Trump’s rally in West Virginia, the indictment of Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and reports on the strength of the economy. Just over a quarter mentioned the killing of Iowa college student Mollie Tibbetts, which the Trump administration seized on to push for stricter controls on immigration. Other stories to garner interest included a hurricane bearing down on Hawaii, an earthquake striking Venezuela, the killing of Shanann Watts, the toppling of a Confederate statue in North Carolina and the emergency landing of a plane carrying rapper Post Malone.

More telling than those statistics are respondents’ own words. You can read a sampling of the responses from across the political spectrum below.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort was convicted of federal charges, and former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to charges in a separate federal case. The week was one of the worst of Trump’s presidency, with questions about how much he was involved in illegal campaign finance schemes.

Here’s how some journalists described the news: “almost surreal,” “all-consuming” and “even by the dizzying standards of the Trump-fueled news cycle … the most frenetic yet.”

And here’s how a 50-year-old California man saw it who said he spent a little under half an hour reading the paper and checking Facebook and Twitter: “Nothing special. Just a ho-hum day.”

Most Americans pay at least a little attention to current events, but they differ enormously in where they turn to get their news and which stories they pay attention to. To get a better sense of how a busy news cycle played out in homes across the country, we repeated an experiment, teaming up with YouGov to ask 1,000 people nationwide to describe their news consumption and respond to a simple prompt: “In your own words, please describe what you would say happened in the news on Tuesday.”

Some were raptly following the latest political developments. One person likened it to “binge-watching a fictional series on Netflix.” But only a quarter of those surveyed said they had paid a lot of attention to the news, and just 27 percent said Tuesday’s news cycle seemed much busier than usual. Many said, sometimes apologetically, that they had been dealing with more pressing demands. Some were busy with work or were dealing with medical issues. One woman was preoccupied battling an eviction from her home; another, after reading the morning paper, spent most of her day helping at a church food bank. A man in New York was camping and couldn’t get a TV signal.

Others were burned out, overwhelmed or uninterested or just didn’t trust the media. “I do not have a big understanding of politics,” another respondent wrote, “and there is so [much] bickering that sometimes I just turn the news off.”

But for many, the Manafort and Cohen stories still broke through. Of those polled who said they had paid any attention to the news and who were able to name at least one news story that happened on Tuesday, nearly three-quarters mentioned the guilty outcomes, making them by far the most-cited news stories.

But Americans’ interpretations of the stories varied widely, as did their levels of interest.

Many of Trump’s opponents were ecstatic (“I love this ‘witch hunt’ so much!” one said), but many of his supporters circled the wagons (“Liberal media glee at the news about Manafort and Cohen, even though Manafort had nothing to do with Trump and Cohen only slightly involved Trump,” one responded). Whereas some rattled off detailed summaries of the proceedings, others’ recollection was limited to, as one put it, “Someone important got convicted.”

And the Manafort and Cohen cases weren’t the only stories to attract attention. About 20 percent of those polled who were able to name at least one news story said they had followed other political topics, including Trump’s rally in West Virginia, the indictment of Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and reports on the strength of the economy. Just over a quarter mentioned the killing of Iowa college student Mollie Tibbetts, which the Trump administration seized on to push for stricter controls on immigration. Other stories to garner interest included a hurricane bearing down on Hawaii, an earthquake striking Venezuela, the killing of Shanann Watts, the toppling of a Confederate statue in North Carolina and the emergency landing of a plane carrying rapper Post Malone.

More telling than those statistics are respondents’ own words. You can read a sampling of the responses from across the political spectrum below.

Sigh …

.

Democrats’ “Last Mile” problem by @BloggersRUs

Democrats’ “Last Mile” problem
by Tom Sullivan


Used with permission. Copyright ScienceCartoonsPlus.com

Democrats need to address a political version of the Last Mile problem this November and going forward.

I warned during a webinar for NC county Democratic officers on Saturday I was about to commit blasphemy. Between now and the close of the polls on November 6th, I did not want them to focus all their efforts on getting people to the polls.

Wait. What did he say?

You know who else is working on getting people to the polls? State and federal legislative caucuses. The state party. The governor. Every candidate. MoveOn, VoteVets, NAACP, Voto Latino, Swing Left, Indivisible, the League of Women Voters, EMILY’s List, OFA, DFA, and a dozen other groups are all working on getting people to the polls. Do you know what they are not working on? What voters do with their ballots once they get there.

Activists who have been poll greeters know how many people vote partial ballots. In 2008, how many first-time voters showed up to cast a vote for Barack Obama with no intention of voting for anybody else? A few weeks ago, an election judge told me she’d pulled blank ballots from ballot boxes. People will go to all the trouble of showing up, she said, and turn in a blank ballot either in protest or because it leaves a public record of them having cast one, even though they didn’t actually vote for anybody.

The job of county committees is a political version of the Last Mile problem in telecommunications. All the high-profile effort and capital spending goes into clearing rights-of-way, erecting towers, and stringing lines. The Last Mile problem is the less conspicuous work of hooking up end users one … by one … by one because that is where companies stop spending money and start making bank.

Everybody and their brothers are working on getting voters to the polls. But Democrats don’t make bank until people actually vote for their candidates, and all the way down the ballot. Oh, they may vote for one or two heavily promoted rock stars up top, but those down-ballot races are our farm team. And if we don’t make bank there, we don’t have a bench.

All the name-brand groups with the budgets and logos focus on getting people to the polls. With their permanent county organizations and precinct structure, completing that last link in the vote-delivery chain is the job of county committees. Because if they don’t do it, it won’t get done.

The focus on voter turnout is vital (and I address how local committees can support that in For The Win). Step 1 is getting the right voters off their couches, out their doors, and to the polls. We don’t bank votes, however, simply by getting people to the polls. The frenetic work that goes into that typically assumes what happens next happens on its own. But banking votes is not like the Sidney Harris cartoon where Step 2 is “THEN A MIRACLE OCCURS” and we win.

It is the reason to provide electioneering training and cover shifts outside polling places during early voting and on Election Day. Poll greeters need to be supplied with easy-to-read sample ballots or slate cards. It is the last opportunity to influence voters’ choices and how they fill out their ballots. And to make sure they do, and all the way to the bottom to minimize the undervote. We don’t pay it near enough attention.

Even many “informed” voters stop dead in their tracks when asked if they know about down-ballot, school board or other nonpartisan races. Yes, we want voters more engaged than that, but the fact is voters dashing in to vote between work, the grocery store, and home are simply looking for reassurance before voting for candidates they don’t know. Or they won’t.

Smile. If you seem trustworthy, they will vote for your candidates. Ideal? No. But that’s how it works. Except it does not work if poll greeters are not there trained and equipped to engage voters as they arrive. (This won’t work for Colorado, Oregon, and Washington, states with vote-by-mail only, or maybe Wyoming where electioneers are permitted no closer to the polling place than 100 yards.)

Democrats could be winning more races in rural districts needed to reclaim state legislatures if they did a better job of both getting voters to the polls and maximizing those voters’ reach once they arrive. I know of no better example than one Jane Mayer wrote about in 2011.

In 2010, directly and through groups he funded, Art Pope, North Carolina’s own mini-Koch brother, threw nearly a million dollars at state Sen. John Snow’s district in North Carolina’s western mountains. Pope groups targeted Snow with two dozen mass mailings. One attack, Mayer wrote, was reminiscent of the infamous Willie Horton ad from 1988. Even after all that money, the last Democratic senator standing in the far west lost his seat by 161 votes in a district spanning 8 counties with an average population under 30,000 – by 2/10ths of 1 percent, less than the undervote in the district’s two largest counties.

So, that’s the Last Mile problem. Democratic county committees (especially rural ones) will need help completing that last link in the vote delivery chain this fall. Be the miracle.

* * * * * * * * *

For The Win 2018 is ready for download. Request a copy of my county-level election mechanics primer at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

Trump, the low class POS

Trump, the low class POS

by digby

McCain is gone. RIP

I wrote this earlier in the day before I heard about it, scheduled for tomorrow. It stands, despite Trump smarmy, insincere bullshit:

In July 2015, after then-candidate Trump rallied an estimated 15,000 in Phoenix and claimed to represent a “silent majority,” McCain said Trump had “fired up the crazies” in his state. The battle was on.

By the end of that month, Trump had disparaged McCain’s Vietnam War service, saying McCain was “not a war hero” despite spending more than five years as a POW and enduring torture.

“He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured,” Trump said during a forum in Ames, Iowa.

Trump refused to apologize at the time, despite criticism from nearly every corner, and has never retracted the statement. He has occasionally told people that he does not regret the comment.

“The reality is that John McCain the politician has made America less safe, sent our brave soldiers into wrongheaded foreign adventures, covered up for President Obama with the VA scandal and has spent most of his time in the Senate pushing amnesty,” Trump wrote in an op-ed for USA Today that month. “He would rather protect the Iraqi border than Arizona’s.”

McCain did eventually endorse Trump in 2016, then withdrew his support weeks before the election after release of an “Access Hollywood” tape where Trump is recorded bragging about groping women.

Trump’s immediate and angry response: “The very foul mouthed Sen. John McCain begged for my support during his primary (I gave, he won), then dropped me over locker room remarks!”

[…]
He repeatedly told advisers that McCain should step down from the seat and let the Republican governor appoint another senator. Trump has also told White House aides that his supporters are not big fans of McCain and boasted that he became president while McCain did not.

Trump’s retelling of the health-care vote, usually without mentioning McCain by name, has continued throughout the senator’s more than year-long treatment for brain cancer. The 81-year-old’s family said Friday that he is discontinuing treatment.

“Obamacare, we got rid of the individual mandate, which is the most unpopular aspect,” Trump said during a political speech Aug. 13 in Utica, N.Y. “I would have gotten rid of everything, but as you know one of our, one of our wonderful senators said, ‘thumbs down,’ at 2 o’clock in the morning.”

[…]
During occasional Oval Office conversations about McCain’s health or status in the Senate, Trump would usually say nothing, current and former officials said. He grew angry regularly that McCain was portrayed as the “good guy” in the news media and he as the “bad guy,” according to a former senior administration official who spoke to Trump about McCain.

Trump has fumed to friends about McCain’s role in receiving research compiled by a former British intelligence officer that alleged Russia had potentially compromising information about Trump. He has complained that McCain has criticized him over Russia and foreign policy, questioning his expertise and noting that he won the presidency and McCain did not.
[…]
In accepting the Freedom Medal at the National Constitutional Center in October, McCain condemned “half-baked, spurious nationalism cooked up by people who would rather find scapegoats than solve problems,” a clear dig at Trump.

Asked about McCain’s remarks the following day, Trump said “people have to be careful, because at some point I fight back.”

“You know, I’m being very nice, I’m being very, very nice, but at some point I fight back and it won’t be pretty,” Trump said in a WMAL interview.

McCain has been giving as good as good as he got in recent months, particularly after the Helsinki debacle, which surely has Trump in a tizzy. And his blind cult followers now agree with him.

Forty-four percent of Republicans surveyed in the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll released Wednesday hold a negative view of McCain, while only 35 percent have a positive view of him. Meanwhile, 52 percent of Democrats surveyed now see him in a positive light.

They must be so proud.

Trump hasn’t said anything recently in public and let’s hope he keeps his mouth shut because anything he says, whether it’s a smarmy insincere tribute or a disgusting insult, will be a sickening act of disrespect. I’ve never been a big McCain fan but he was good on some things, like fighting the torture regime, and he deserves to be treated with dignity for his courage and sacrifice as a POW. Any words out of this depraved imbecile’s mouth would be a desecration.

Also this cowardly piece of shit (who can’t even fire his own people or confront them in person) threatening anyone is a joke. All he can do is tweet and talk like a bully behind people’s backs. In person he’s a sniveling wimp.

This says it all:

“What’s going on?” Trump asks Omarosa. “I just saw on the news that you’re thinking about leaving? What happened?”

After Omarosa explains that Kelly told her that “you guys” had asked her to go, Trump responds “No…I, I..Nobody even told me about it.”

Hmmmmm.

“You know they run a big operation, but I didn’t know it. Goddamnit, I don’t love you leaving at all.”

Take a kiss without regret: Scotty & the Secret History of Hollywood (***) by Dennis Hartley @denofcinema5

Take a kiss without regret: Scotty & the Secret History of Hollywood (***)

By Dennis Hartley

I’m stiff on my legend,
The films that I made
Forget that I’m fifty
‘Cause you just got paid

-David Bowie, from “Cracked Actor”

Marilyn Monroe once famously said “Hollywood is a place where they’ll pay you a thousand dollars for a kiss and fifty cents for your soul. I know, because I turned down the first offer often enough and held out for the fifty cents.” Of course, she was specifically referring to the craft of acting, and the difficulty of maintaining integrity while toiling in the skin-deep recesses of the Dream Factory. Indeed, there are myriad stories of those who got off the bus in Tinseltown with stars in their eyes, determined to “make it” at any cost-only to get chewed up and spit out; dreams shattered, souls crushed.

Then you have people like Scotty Bowers, the subject of Matt Tyrnauer’s documentary Scotty and the Secret History of Hollywood. When recently discharged Marine combat veteran Bowers came to Hollywood in 1946, he had no illusions about becoming a “star” …in fact he had virtually no expectations at all. He had no acting aspirations. What he did have was a knack for fixing cars, a winning personality, and strapping good looks. He was perfectly happy to land his job working at a service station on Hollywood Boulevard.

As recounted by the now 90-something Bowers, what happened to him soon thereafter almost parallels Dirk Diggler’s journey in Paul Thomas Anderson’s Boogie Nights; a sort of pilgrim’s progress story for hedonists…the difference being that Bowers’ story is real.

What begins as a chance encounter at the pump with actor Walter Pidgeon, who immediately senses something “special” about Scotty and invites him over to his house for a “dip in the pool” ends up as a decades-long dip in Hollywood decadence for the affable ex-serviceman. Bowers became (to use the polite term) a “procurer to the stars”, arranging trysts for many of Hollywood’s closeted elites. He does name names; Bowers certainly shows no coyness in that department (they’re all dead now anyway, he figures).

Bowers also developed quite a rep for his own, erm, “servicing” prowess, with both men and women. Yet, there is no braggadocio on his part; this is a person so straightforward, charming, and refreshingly devoid of sexual hang-ups that by the time he matter-of-factly recalls engaging in “a three-way” with Lana Turner and Ava Gardner, you’ll find yourself thinking, “Yeah, okay. I can definitely see how that could happen. Why not?”

But it’s not all about the sex and the salaciousness (OK, mostly…but not all). Some of the “secrets” divulged in the film have been public knowledge for years (in particular, anyone who has leafed through Kenneth Anger’s “Hollywood Babylon” will be shocked, shocked at a number of these revelations). And some of this ground was already covered in the excellent 1995 documentary The Celluloid Closet. Still, Tyrnauer does a good job at contextualizing the historical reasons Bowers’ clients had to keep this all so hush-hush.

There is also a Grey Gardens vibe conjured up by the footage of Bowers at home with his wife. In addition to a rather obvious hoarding issue, Bowers doesn’t flinch when the odd skunk or coyote wanders into his garage to feed on the treats he leaves out for them.

There are brief glimpses into darker parts of Bowers’ psyche; there are hints of undiagnosed PTSD symptoms going back to his WW2 experiences, and he speaks at one point of being molested as a child (oddly, as if sensing how it might be perceived, he goes out of his way to give it a sex-positive spin-but it’s unconvincing coverup of denial).

But the real fun is in the dishing; and you’ll find yourself leaning forward as Bower chats and charms his way into your guilty pleasure center (you may even start to see what Walter Pidgeon saw all those years ago). Speaking for myself, I’ll never again be able to look at Bringing Up Baby or Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner? without certain…subtexts.

Previous posts with related themes:

Tab Hunter Confidential
The Fabulous Allan Carr
Every Act of Life
The Mayor of the Sunset Strip

More reviews at Den of Cinema
On Facebook
On Twitter


–Dennis Hartley

A moment of normal, human decency shocks the world

A moment of normal, human decency shocks the world

by digby

This is a beautiful thing, a small gesture of basic, human love from a mother and police office that gives you hope that our misbegotten species might have a chance if we really tried:

A police officer in Argentina performed a “gesture of love” after she heard a crying baby that needed to be fed. Officer Celeste Ayala breastfed the malnourished infant, a moment that was captured in a photo and went viral on social media.

Ayala was working her shift Tuesday at Sor María Ludovica in Buenos Aires when the 6-month-old baby was brought in along with five of her siblings by social workers to the hospital, according to Argentine news outlet Clarin. The children were all malnourished and the little girl’s cries prompted Ayala, a mother of a newborn herself, to do something.

With the permission of hospital staff, she sprang into action, comforting the baby and breastfeeding her until she stopped weeping. One of her colleagues caught the special interaction in a photo.

“I want to make public this great gesture of love that you made today with that baby, who you did not know, but for who you did not hesitate to act like a mother,” said Marcos Heredia, who posted the image to Facebook. “Things like that are not seen every day.”

Somebody once said “it takes a village” and people rolled their eyes. But it does.

.

One tiny baby step in Trumpville

One tiny baby step in Trumpville

by digby

Even on MSNBC, I see right wingers trying to defend Trump’s blatant lying about his hush money schemes and his yammering like a mob boss on national TV. But surprisingly, there’s a little tiny bit of light dawning over at Fox:

Fox News anchor Bret Baier on Friday said that President Donald Trump had not been truthful during an interview with his network.

The chief political anchor was reporting on news that the chief financial officer of the Trump Organization had been granted immunity by federal prosecutors

“You wonder if he may have known when he was sitting with [Fox & Friends host] Ainsley Earhardt about this or the possibility of this when he was talking about that flipping sentence,” Baier said.

During Earhardt’s interview, Trump said that flipping “almost ought to be illegal.” The president also denied that he knew about payments that his longtime attorney, Michael Cohen, had made to his alleged mistresses.

It is unclear whether Weisselberg told prosecutors that Trump had knowledge of those payments. But in making his guilty plea, Cohen said that the payments were made with Trump’s knowledge. Trump was also caught on tape discussing with Cohen how to pay off a Playboy model’s story about an alleged affair.

“I mean, the president’s rollout of explaining this has not been clear,” Baier said. “The Washington Post says it’s a flat out lie in their fact-checking. I think you could look back at the statements and clearly he was not 100 percent truthful as he laid that out. You’ve got his answer to Ainsley Earhardt, saying he knew later on.”

Yes, he was more than “not 100 percent truthful” he is a pathological liar. But baby steps are welcome.

.

It looks like the plan is working well Comrade Trump

It looks like the plan is working well Comrade Trump

by digby

I think we can assume the Russians are trying to help Republicans win the midterms, so maybe they should just spend their time trying to shore up the election systems. Oh wait, that’s right. The Republicans in congress refused to fund the effort last week. Never mind.

In 2016, American intelligence agencies delivered urgent and explicit warnings about Russia’s intentions to try to tip the American presidential election — and a detailed assessment of the operation afterward — thanks in large part to informants close to President Vladimir V. Putin and in the Kremlin who provided crucial details.

But two years later, the vital Kremlin informants have largely gone silent, leaving the C.I.A. and other spy agencies in the dark about precisely what Mr. Putin’s intentions are for November’s midterm elections, according to American officials familiar with the intelligence.

The officials do not believe the sources have been compromised or killed. Instead, they have concluded they have gone to ground amid more aggressive counterintelligence by Moscow, including efforts to kill spies, like the poisoning in March in Britain of a former Russian intelligence officer that utilized a rare Russian-made nerve agent.

Current and former officials also said the expulsion of American intelligence officers from Moscow has hurt collection efforts. And officials also raised the possibility that the outing of an F.B.I. informant under scrutiny by the House intelligence committee — an examination encouraged by President Trump — has had a chilling effect on intelligence collection.

Technology companies and political campaigns in recent weeks have detected a plethora of political interference efforts originating overseas, including hacks of Republican think tanks and fake liberal grass-roots organizations created on Facebook. Senior intelligence officials, including Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, have warned that Russians are intent on subverting American democratic institutions.

It really helps to have a president and a political party working with a foreign country to help them destroy their domestic enemies. Why didn’t anyone think of this before?