Skip to content

Month: October 2018

Trump and Putin’s nuke gambit

Trump and Putin’s nuke gambit

by digby

My Salon column this morning:

We are a little less than a week away from an extremely important election and President Trump is on a roll, flooding the zone with non-stop rallies and press avails. His falsehoods and exaggerations have reached unprecedented levels which is really saying something.

The Washington Post reported that he has the administration constantly scrambling after the fact to produce policies and reports to fulfill his off-the-cuff impulses and whims such as the tax cut that nobody had heard of but which he claimed had people working “around the clock” to deliver before the election. It happens all the time.

He really is like a mad King, issuing absurd orders which his minions and henchmen all rush to fulfill. In the case of the idiotic “Space Force” it’s actually happening and it’s even dafter than we originally thought. On Tuesday the Post’s Robert Costa interviewed Vice President Mike Pence and asked him if they were planning to nuclearize space. He didn’t deny it.

What we need to do is make sure that we provide for the common defense of the people of the United States of America, and that’s the president’s determination here,” Pence said in an interview with The Washington Post, when asked whether nuclear weapons should be banned from orbit.

What could go wrong? It’s not like these things ever fall out of the sky. (Well, actually they do.)

There’s a treaty banning weapons of mass destruction dating back to 1967 which Pence claimed nonetheless gives countries a lot of flexibility saying, “at this time, we don’t see any need to amend the treaty.” Trump could decide to withdraw from it in a fit of pique, of course, which is probably why Pence was so non-committal. There is no such thing as a commitment by the United States of America anymore. And the man does love to tear up a treaty.

Just this week Trump announced that he plans to terminate the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty which was signed by President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1987. Washington and Moscow agreed not to field ground-based cruise missiles capable of flying between 310 and 3400 miles. It was a big deal leading to both countries destroying thousands of nuclear missiles and launching facilities.

In recent years, Russia has been accused of violating the treaty. There has been a lot of back and forth in recent years and there is a reasonable debate to be had about the future of this treaty. Needless to say, Trump (who reportedly wondered why we shouldn’t bring the number of nukes back up to where they were in the 1960s) is eager to build a whole new nuclear arsenal because he believes that will scare all the other countries into destroying theirs. That’s just how he thinks the world works. His national security adviser John Bolton just believes arms control agreements are for suckers and he wants to get rid of all of them. He’s been calling for the US to abrogate this INF treaty for years.

The Russian government might be very happy for the US to terminate. They can go about their arms build-up while pretending they were the responsible statesmen compared to those nuts Trump and Bolton. But I wouldn’t be surprised if President Putin had something even more crafty up his sleeve.

Trump always mentions that arms control is one of the topics he and Putin discuss on the phone and in person. For instance, recall that after the infamous “congratulations” call he wasn’t supposed to make, he said, “I had a call with President Putin and congratulated him on the victory, his electoral victory. The call had to do, also, with the fact that we will probably get together in the not-too-distant future so that we can discuss arms, we can discuss the arms race. As you know, he made a statement that being in an arms race is not a great thing.”

The surprise summit in Helsinki came soon after. And several weeks later Politico published a leaked Russian document listing proposed topics for that private meeting which was headed “Dialogue on the Issue of Arms Control.” Whether or not this was “leaked” with intention is unknown and the motives for leaking it are unclear although the Russian reaction to the leak was a bit too histrionic to be believable considering how anodyne the document was. It was odd.

We know that Trump can’t find it in himself to criticize the Russian leader. He’s simply been incapable of it. So what are we to make of this “trash talk” he threw out on his way to Marine One the other day?

Q Mr. President, are you prepared to build up the U.S. nuclear arsenal? You said you’re going to pull out of the arms deal.

THE PRESIDENT: Until people come to their senses, we will build it up. Until people come to their senses. Russia has not adhered to the agreement. This should’ve been done years ago. Until people come to their senses — we have more money than anybody else, by far. We’ll build it up. Until they come to their senses. When they do, then we’ll all be smart and we’ll all stop. And we’ll — and by the way, not only stop, we’ll reduce, which I would love to do. But right now, they have not adhered to the agreement.

Q Is that a threat to Vladimir Putin?

THE PRESIDENT: It’s a threat to whoever you want. And it includes China, and it includes Russia, and it includes anybody else that wants to play that game. You can’t do that. You can’t play that game on me.

Does that sound like anything Trump has ever said about Putin before?

Bolton has been in Russia this week and announced today that the president would be meeting with Putin in Paris right after the election for the big military parade Trump loves so much. The press seemed confused wondering what could possibly be the point of another meeting between these two at this point.

Who knows? Trump loves these face-to-face meetings and Putin seems to understand that so maybe there’s nothing more to it. But I would not be surprised if they have already decided to “announce” that they are terminating the INF agreement (and possibly others as well) but have agreed to a major arms control agreement that will put all those previous agreements to shame! It would be modeled on that extraordinary meeting of the minds between Trump and Kim Jong Un only much bigger and better.

They won’t have any details of course. Who needs that when they have a beautiful letter of intent that means absolutely nothing. All Trump will have to do is tear up all the previous treaties and tell his base that he’s ended the nuclear threat and that will be the end of that. It’s worked out well for Kim Jong Un, why not for Vladimir Putin?

Obviously, I have no idea whether this is the plan. If it is the next Congress might have something to say about it. But just the fact that it’s plausible is terrifying enough.

.

The latest Big Lie

The latest Big Lie

by digby

On Monday this happened:

10/22/2018 04:27 pm ET

Trump Administration Launches New Attack On ACA’s Pre-existing Protections

Yet another reminder that the GOP hasn’t given up on trying to kill Obamacare.

The Republican Party’s assault on the Affordable Care Act continued Monday as the Trump administration found yet another way to undermine the law’s insurance rules.

Health care has become a defining issue of next month’s midterm elections, and Republicans across the country, including President Donald Trump, are promising voters that they care deeply about protecting people with pre-existing conditions.

But Monday’s rule change almost certainly means that, overall, people with serious medical problems are likely to have a harder time finding coverage ― and, ultimately, paying their medical bills.

Under guidance from the Department of Health and Human Services that takes effect immediately but likely won’t affect insurance markets for another year, state governments will have new leeway to request waivers from some of the federal health care law’s core requirements.

That includes requirements affecting which benefits insurance plans cover, as well as requirements on who gets financial assistance and how much, and how the people choosing insurance can use that assistance.

I have a feeling this one will not fly with anyone but a Trump troll. Even the most hardcore Republicans know what side they’ve been on in all this.

It’s audacious, I’ll give them that …

At least they weren’t yelled at in a restaurant

At least they weren’t yelled at in a restaurant

by digby

You can’t make this stuff up

On Wednesday morning, Fox News was forced to interrupt a segment breathlessly fear-mongering about “left-wing mobs” and protesters confronting Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) at a restaurant to cover news that bombs had been sent to the Clintons and Obamas.

Just before Fox News shifted gears, James Freeman of the Wall Street Journal alluded to Trump’s demonizing of the Clintons and said, without disapproval, that “President Trump is the president because of a lot of anger at the other actors in politics.”

As soon as Blakeman said that, host Bill Hemmer jumped in to cover the White House’s condemnation of the bombs sent to the Clintons and Obamas — a condemnation that rings hollow in light of Trump’s regular and ongoing demonizing of Hillary Clinton.

At the same time that Fox News fear-mongered about the left on Wednesday morning, CNN abruptly had to end broadcasting from its studio in New York after a “suspicious package” was reported in its building.

Fox News has been hyping alleged left-wing “incivility” while essentially serving as a propaganda service for Trump and the Republican Party ahead of the midterm elections. Meanwhile, within the last week, Trump has both encouraged Republican violence against journalists and downplayed the murder of a journalist by a close U.S. ally.

The Clintons and Obamas received bombs in the mail just two days after the same thing happened to liberal philanthropist George Soros. All of them have been targeted for abuse by Trump, though the White House’s condemnation on Wednesday did not mention Soros by name.

Anyone want to bet on how long it takes for Trump to blame the “left wing mob” for sending these bombs to themselves?

Who’s calling the shots? by @BloggersRUs

Who’s calling the shots?
by Tom Sullivan

Several California U.S. House seats are rated toss-ups by Real Clear Politics and Cook’s Political Report. CA-22 held by Devin Nunes of Fresno is not one of them, and is ranked a safe seat. Still, the sitting president might not want to take chances with losing his guard dog.

“Representative Devin Nunes, a man of tremendous courage and grit, may someday be recognized as a Great American Hero for what he has exposed and what he has had to endure!” the sitting president tweeted in February. On Tuesday, the San Francisco Chronicle suggested that Donald Trump may yet venture into California ahead of November 6 to shore up support for California Republicans:

“Everything is on the table with the president and the party,” Ronna McDaniel, chair of the Republican National Committee, told The Chronicle’s John Wildermuth while she was campaigning in Orange County with GOP Rep. Dana Rohrabacher. “He has kept the last week of the campaign clear, and he’ll be where he is needed.”

Trump has come close to California in the last week, making campaign stops in Elko, Nev. and Mesa, Ariz., for Republican U.S. Senate candidates. But Trump is more popular in those states than in California, where only 27 percent of voters approve of the president’s job performance, according to a USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll released last week.

There is a point to make about turning that disapproval into removal for the Rohrabachers and Trumpers like Nunes, and not just in California.

Dr. Michael Bitzer at Old North State Politics observes that with two weeks to go in the 2018 elections voting in North Carolina is tracking 2016 presidential-year turnout:

Furthermore, Bitzer shows Democrats surging ahead of Republicans in absentee ballot requests. Some of this may be the effect of hurricane victims’ requests.

On Monday, I mentioned a chart I’d seen comparing voting age population in North Carolina against early voting turnout by population. Last night, I built one (at top). The NC population curve is not dissimilar to the overall U.S. population curve.

Even though overall numbers look favorable for Democrats in NC, I always remind voters Republicans bat last. Running up a score in early voting is no guarantee that lead will hold on Election Day. But notice in my chart just who is voting. The press likes to run reports about apathy among younger voters. Their votes don’t matter, nothing ever changes, the system is corrupt, etc. The chart confirms what we already know: older Americans vote in higher numbers. It’s just that older voters don’t have the numbers to wield the power they do. People under 45 do. They just don’t. If you don’t show up to play, you forfeit.

In the same way Republicans wield power disproportionate to their actual numbers, older voters do too. Younger voters could be running this joint. They could be calling the shots and making the changes they want to see.

In California, they could be making guys like Devin Nunes and Dana Rohrabacher go bye-bye. If they only exercised the power right in front of them.

* * * * * * * * *

For The Win 2018 is ready for download. Request a copy of my county-level election mechanics primer at tom.bluecentury at gmail.

Trump wants China to suffer

Trump wants China to suffer

by digby

The long  trade war:

President Trump has no intention of easing his tariffs on China, according to three sources with knowledge of his private conversations. Instead, these sources say he wants Chinese leaders to feel more pain from his tariffs — which he believes need more time to fully kick in.

What we’re hearing: “He wants them to suffer more” from tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods, said a source with direct knowledge of Trump’s thinking, and the president believes the longer his tariffs last, the more leverage he’ll have.

Trump’s trade war with China is at the “beginning of the beginning,” according to a source familiar with Trump’s conversations. And his team doesn’t expect much from the tentatively planned meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Buenos Aires next month.
The Trump economic team has done no substantive planning so far for the bilateral meeting’s agenda, largely because the purpose of the meeting is for Trump and Xi to reconnect, eyeball each other, and feel each other out amid their escalating trade war.

“It’s a heads of state meeting, not a trade meeting,” a source with direct knowledge told Axios.

“Trump is thinking about this meeting as a personal reconnection with President Xi, not a meeting that’s going to evolve into detailed discussions,” said a source familiar with Trump’s thinking. 
“The sides are very far apart. … Right now, there’s not the common basis for proceeding.”
Trump isn’t focused on the details of a potential China deal. He’s focused on creating more leverage, according to another source who recently discussed the U.S.-China standoff with the president.

Behind the scenes: Trump has privately boasted that his China tariffs have driven down the country’s stock market. Experts say the trade war has hurt market sentiment, but the stock market has never been a reliable barometer of Chinese economic strength.

The generic point Trump makes to aides, per a source with direct knowledge: “‘We are strong and they are weak.’ … He believes more pressure will bring them to the table to make a deal.”

Treasury officials have had contact with key Chinese negotiator Liu He’s camp to exchange information. There’s been nothing close to real negotiation, according to sources briefed on them. “There is some contact with mid-level Chinese, but not much. … I wouldn’t overestimate the planning process,” a U.S. official with direct knowledge told me.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s team has told the Chinese there’s no point in them floating plans to buy U.S. products as the key priorities — structural issues like IP theft and market access — must be addressed.
Treasury officials have told the Chinese that the list of U.S. requirements hasn’t changed from the summer, according to sources briefed on their conversations.

All signs suggest the trade war between the U.S. and China is just getting started. I’ve asked sources close to Trump whether he’s ever expressed any private concerns over whether his tariffs could backfire due to Chinese retaliation against American consumers or companies. Nobody I’ve spoken to has heard Trump express anything along these lines. He’s all in.

Prediction: The Chinese see that they are dealing with a fucking moron and will have the patience to wait him out.

They may have too much faith in the American people though. There’s at least a fair chance he’ll get a second term. He cheats.

He may be upping the ante:

.

A snug and comfy bubble

A snug and comfy bubble

by digby

Did you know that they have Trump only going to small venues in places he won big? Probably not.  All we see is him standing up on a stage in front of a sea of rapturous Redhats.

President Trump’s quest to help Republican midterm candidates has taken him this month to an airplane hangar in a far-flung Nevada county that he won with 73 percent of votes, a fairgrounds building in rural Ohio that could only hold 3,000 and an 8,000-capacity college arena in Kentucky — located about 25 miles south of Lexington, where Air Force One landed and where larger venues are located. 

As the president campaigns, he has mostly avoided the suburban areas that strategists say will be key to deciding the midterms — and where he is often less popular and runs the risk of energizing Democrats or hurting Republican candidates who have tried to distance themselves from him. Over the past few weeks, he has focused heavily on more rural areas where he is especially popular and where his presence can encourage the base voters Republican candidates need. 

Of the 27 midterm rallies Trump has held this year, more than three-quarters were held in counties that he won in 2016 by an average of 59.5 percent. The few times that he has ventured to counties that Democrat Hillary Clinton won, those places are nearly always surrounded on all sides by counties that he won. And more than a third of the rallies were in or near the Appalachian Mountains, where his popularity remains high. 

Those areas, and the snug event spaces he finds there, have become Trump’s comfort zone, and also a sign of how convinced he remains that his most loyal supporters can drive a victory in 2018 as they did in 2016. (A rare departure will occur Monday night, when Trump will attempt to fill his largest venue in nearly two years: The Toyota Center in the heart of Houston can hold 19,000 and is located in a county that Clinton won in 2016.)

If Trump wasn’t given wall-to-wall coverage this would be more important. Unfortunately, he’s the president. Still, it would be useful if the media would make it clear that these rallies are all in Trump’s cozy bubble of small venues in very easy places.

.

Northern white racists letting their confederate freak flag fly

Some very fine people letting their confederate freak flag fly

by digby

Apparently, a bunch of racist right wingers think flying the Confederate flag isn’t a sign of support for racism and white supremacy. But since they can’t claim they’re just “protecting their heritage” (they’re not from the Confederate states) they can’t really hide it:

A short walk from where President-elect Abraham Lincoln made the last train stop in his home state before leaving for Washington on the verge of the Civil War, a Confederate battle flag flies from a home garage.

The property belongs to former mayor Greg Cler, who runs a car repair shop in this central Illinois village of 3,500 people. Cler isn’t from the South. He grew up about five miles away, in Pesotum, where his father, like most others in the region, farmed corn and soy. But Cler has long felt an attachment to the flag.

“Part of it is an act of rebellion,” he said.

The other part is tied to the national turmoil surrounding race and identity. Cler sees the flag as a fitting symbol of white people’s shared grievances, which, he says, have new resonance today.

“I proudly fly it like I do the American flag,” he said, nodding to the two red, white and blue banners — representing opposing sides of the country’s bloodiest conflict — waving in synchrony above his head.

Perhaps the most contentious of American emblems, the Confederate flag is grounded in a history of slavery and segregation in the South. But despite recent moves to eradicate it from statehouses, vehicle license plates and store shelves, the banner has been embraced far from its founding region, still flying from spacious Victorian houses in New Jersey, above barns in Ohio and over music festivals in Oregon.

The Confederate flag’s appearance at Trump rallies in 2016, sometimes emblazoned with his name, cemented its link to his “Make America Great Again” brand of patriotism, which appealed to many disaffected white people. Some supporters say the country under President Barack Obama put the needs of minorities before theirs.

“It seemed like I wasn’t represented,” Cler said, while others “took advantage of the system.”

For people like him, the Confederate flag reflects 21st-century pride in a form of American identity that harks back to the scrappy self-sufficiency of the white settlers of Appalachia. To others, flying the flag for “white grievance” is simply racism by a different name, an effort to redefine patriotism as the interests of white Americans.

Many retailers say sales of the Confederate flag are strong, even increasing. Dewey Barber, who owns Georgia-based Dixie Outfitters, said the biggest change he has seen since launching the business — which sells flags and other goods bearing Confederate iconography — in 1997 is an increase in sales to the North and the West, from about 5 percent to 20 percent of his business.

The flag is sometimes merged with patriotic icons, including in hybrid flags that bind it physically to the Stars and Stripes.

“I think the patriotic mood of the country has kind of taken over,” said Barber, who is white, drawing little distinction between pride in symbols of the United States and the Confederacy. “We sell a lot more American things than we used to.”
[…]
The effort to pair it with displays of patriotism is met with resistance from those who note that Dixiecrats brandished the Confederate battle flag in opposition to the civil rights movement, and that neo-Nazis paraded it through Charlottesville last year.

“The flag can mean anything you want it to mean,” said Jarret Ruminski, author of “The Limits of Loyalty: Ordinary People in Civil War Mississippi” — often a poke in the eye of political correctness.

“But the history of the flag is very clear and unambiguously connected to white supremacy. That history is undeniable, whether people want to acknowledge it or not.”

Well sure. The Republican party is actively rooting for foreign adversaries to help them cheat in American elections. Why wouldn’t they think the Confederacy, which waged war on the US, is worth defending on principle?

Obviously, the real reason is simple. The man says it right out:

Some supporters say the country under President Barack Obama put the needs of minorities before theirs.

“It seemed like I wasn’t represented,” Cler said, while others “took advantage of the system.”

All-American racist whiners. They’ve been around for a long, long time. Trump, of course, is the biggest racist whiner of all time — he thinks the whole world is “taking advantage” of the system. What a bunch of sniveling babies.

.

Nukes in space. What a great idea.

Nukes in space. What a great idea.

by digby

Headline o’ the day:

Pence leaves open the possibility of nuclear weapons in space: ‘Peace comes through strength’

My God. It’s no longer just a “space force.” It’s a nuclear “space force.” These people have lost their frickkin’ minds.

“What we need to do is make sure that we provide for the common defense of the people of the United States of America and that’s the president’s determination here,” Pence said in an interview with The Washington Post, when asked if nuclear weapons should be banned from orbit.

Pence added, “What we want to do is continue to advance the principle that peace comes through strength.”

The new positioning comes as the Trump administration moves to potentially exit a major nuclear weapons pact with Russia and possibly bolster U.S. military operations in the heavens by forming a “Space Force.”

The 1967 Outer Space Treaty outlawed weapons of mass destruction from space, including nuclear weapons, and stopped the arms race between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union from entering space.

In recent days, President Trump has also signaled a willingness to withdraw from or renegotiate long-standing treaties. Trump told reporters last Saturday in Nevada that the U.S. would exit a landmark 1987 arms control agreement with the former Soviet Union, due to his belief that it constrains the U.S. from developing its own weapons and that Russia has violated the pact.

I feel like I’m living in a dystopian cartoon. This is daft.

As I mentioned before, Trump’s “tough talk” against Putin and Russia (“you can’t game me!”) leads me to believe that this is actually a different kind of collusion. Trump said after every meeting with Putin that they were talking about “arms control” so I’m guessing their secret meeting in Helsinki may have resulted in setting up one of Trump’s pageants, where he gins up the phony crisis and then pretends to solve it while everyone else in the world laughs behind his back but he doesn’t know it. Putin said today that he wants to meet with Trump in Pris.

I’m sure they’ll fall in love. Oh wait. They already are. Trump is Putin’s trophy husband.

The bigger problem is that these things often get out of control. Trump is a buffoon who doesn’t know what he’s talking about, of course. But he’s empowered some real nuts in his administration and the congress:

A few notes to get up to speed:

.

Coupla bros sittin’ around talkin’

Coupla bros sittin’ around talkin’

by digby

Yesterday CNN’s Van Jones held a happy-talk interview with the elusive Jared Kushner. Since he rarely gives interviews it should have been a good opportunity to ask him some hard questions and follow-up closely. He’s a very important person and he’s only accountable to Donald Trump.

Jones asked him how he got his job. Not kidding:

He did not answer, “by marrying the boss’s daughter,” but that’s the fact. Everyone in the world knows this. It’s the dumbest question on earth.

It didn’t get any better. But you have to love this one which wasn’t followed up:

When Mr. Jones noted that even Mr. Trump had said that there had been “deception” and “lies” from the Saudis in relation to the Khashoggi case, Mr. Kushner offered a more muted response.

“We’re getting facts in from multiple places,” he said. “Once those facts come in, the secretary of state will work with our national security team to help us determine what we want to believe.”

I’m sure they will.

Jones defended his interview saying:

“I thought it was important to challenge him, but I really wanted to make sure that he was able to explain himself without having to defend himself on everything. Because when you get somebody like that talking, sometimes it’s good to just let them talk,” Jones said.

“People on Twitter are saying, ‘Cut him off, beat him up.’ I’m like, this is the first time you’re hearing him say something. You want me to stop him from saying something? I think he should say something.”

.

Presidential role model

Presidential role model

by digby

Leadership qualities:

A man arrested for allegedly touching a woman’s breast on an airplane, according to court documents, told authorities “the president of the United States says it’s OK to grab women by their private parts.”

Bruce Alexander was on a Houston-to-Albuquerque flight on Sunday when he twice leaned forward and touched the breast of a woman sitting in front of him, court records show.

The woman, who wasn’t identified, told authorities she thought the first of two touchings may have been accidental, while the second clearly wasn’t.

(MORE: Trump mocks Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault)
According to court documents, after she dozed off and was touched again “she rose from her seat, turned around and told the passenger behind her that she didn’t know why he thought it was OK and he needed to stop.”

A crew member relocated the woman to a different seat.

Alexander, whose hands matched those described by the victim — “thick fingers, were hairy and dirty finger nails” — was arrested when the plane landed.

Thank goodness it’s not a legal defense. Yet.