Skip to content

Month: July 2019

Fasten your seatbelts. The debt ceiling negotiations just got real

Fasten your seatbelts. The debt ceiling negotiations just got real

by digby

This piece by Martin Longman spells out the situation on the ground. If we were dealing with a sane actor in the White House, this wouldn’t even be an issue. Both parties would want to take this particular issue off the table until after 2020.  But Trump is so stupid and narcissistic that he may be unpersuadable:

It may not be accurate, but many political analysts believe that Donald Trump’s tenuous hold on approval numbers in the low-to-mid forties is reliant on the continued health of the economy. It seems like a sound theory. Trump has occasionally slipped into the high-thirties, so we know that his floor is at least that low. It also appears that good unemployment numbers, a growing stock market, and decent economic growth are his best arguments for reelection. This actually gives the Democrats an incentive to sabotage the economy as the Republicans attempted to do repeatedly during the presidency of Barack Obama. It’s probably only a sense of basic responsibility, one their right-wing colleagues don’t share, that prevents them from welcoming a default on the nation’s debt.
Contrary to their promises, the Republican tax cuts have not generated more tax revenue and the Treasury Department believes that the country could run out of money during Congress’s August recess. This puts Nancy Pelosi in the driver’s seat. She knows that if we default it will kill our credit rating and cause an economic contraction, possibly on a global scale. She also knows who will get blamed most if that happens. It will be Donald Trump, who has few accomplishments aside from the performance of the economy to show the electorate. If she is going to save Trump from defaulting in the next few days before Congress goes home for summer vacation, she expects to get something in return.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin spoke late Monday as they tried to broker a debt ceiling and budget deal with just days left before Congress plans to leave for the rest of the summer.
The talks took on new urgency after Pelosi shot down a White House fallback plan that would have Congress raise the debt ceiling — potentially for just a short period of time — by late next week if they failed to reach a budget agreement. 

Pelosi, the California Democrat, said the idea of raising the debt ceiling on its own and not in conjunction with a budget agreement was not “acceptable to our caucus” and therefore did not stand a chance of passage in the House of Representatives.

She’s demanding a two-year spending agreement and she’s not interested in a short-term fix so they can resume negotiations after Labor Day. This is her hardball negotiating position, but it’s not clear she’ll stick to it. Some people are operating on the assumption that she won’t.

People involved in the negotiations said they were not panicking and that there were still multiple options to avoid a full-blown crisis, and they also said that all sides were working hard to reach a resolution. One option would be for lawmakers and the White House to reach an agreement in principle on the budget before the August recess, temporarily raise the debt ceiling, and then agree on specifics in the intervening months.

There’s little doubt in my mind that a Republican Speaker dealing with a Democratic president would be willing to stick to their guns and get the concessions they demanded. But that would more obviously work because a Democratic president would rather make concessions than risk throwing millions of people out of work. I don’t know for sure that Donald Trump really understands what default would look like and what it would do to his political standing. Pelosi holds his fate in her hands, and he doesn’t like to be in that kind of situation and may just be constitutionally incapable of accepting it as a reality.


Having a mentally unstable ignoramus leading the country is so, so dangerous on every level.

.

Big cheers on the alt-right

Big cheers on the alt-right

by digby

Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden 1939

Yesterday, Trump was asked:

REPORTER: Does it concern you that many people saw that tweet as racist and that white nationalist groups are finding common cause with you on that point?

He replied:

TRUMP: It doesn’t concern me because many people agree with me.

The ADL surveyed the reaction from those people who agree with him:

Neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin was apparently thrilled by the tweets, posting on his popular Daily Stormer website: “Man, President Trump’s Twitter account has been pure fire lately. This might be the funniest thing he’s ever tweeted. This is the kind of WHITE NATIONALISM we elected him for. And we’re obviously seeing it only because there’s another election coming up. But I’ll tell you, even knowing that, it still feels so good.”

Anglin also emphasized the political implications of Mr. Trump telling people of color to “go back” to their countries: “This is what elected Trump and this is what will always be the best way for him to gain support,” and underscored the importance of these comments being directed at U.S. citizens, particularly Rep. Pressley, who was born in Cincinnati: “So this is not some half-assed anti-immigrant white nationalism. Trump is literally telling American blacks to go back to Africa.”

Meanwhile, alt right figurehead Richard Spencer acknowledged the appeal of the President’s tweets to a range of alt right activists, but also appeared to warn that Trump was bound to disappoint white supremacists (again).

White supremacist organizer and frequent political candidate Augustus Invictus seemed to praise the President’s tweets:

Matt Parrott, former head of the white supremacist Traditionalist Worker Party, appeared to acknowledge the political strategy behind the President’s comments, tweeting:

White supremacist podcaster “Sven Longshanks” primed his “Daily Nationalist” audience by praising the President: “Trump started the week in a great way today by tweeting that the four worst non-White communists in the Democrat Party should go back and fix their own countries first before trying to tell America what to do. Of course he is being accused of being ‘racist’ for pointing this out, as nobody can argue their countries of origin are not ‘the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world’.”

Another white supremacist podcaster, James Edwards of The Political Cesspool, responded to U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s defense of the congresswomen with his own racist vitriol:

The President’s tweets are being celebrated elsewhere across the extremist spectrum. On Sunday, anti-Muslim bigot Pamela Geller, head of the Islamophobic American Freedom Defense Initiative/Stop Islamization of America reposted his tweets accompanied by this gleeful comment:

Right-wing Islamophobe and Freedom Center founder David Horowitz defended the President’s comments, calling the targeted congresswomen “anti-Semites, pro-terrorists… anti-Americans…” He blasted the media outlets who have criticized Trump’s tweets, calling them “shills” for Reps. Pressley, Omar, Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez.

.

A day which should live in infamy but probably won’t

A day which should live in infamy but probably won’t

by digby

When I saw this and realized that nothing would ever part Trump from his voters. It was the single worst moment I’ve ever seen a president deliver on the international stage.

I still can’t believe it actually happened, but it did.

And he’s getting away with everything…

Kellyanne gets the bootlicking gold star of the day

Kellyanne gets the bootlicking gold star of the day

by digby

And it was a tough competition:

She was just modeling being a good soldier and following Dear Leaders orders:

“Don’t show weakness, Republicans! Stick by Dear Leader or else!”

Meanwhile, fromn the other side of Kellyanne’s bed, we got this from her husband:

[H]ow naive an adult [like me] could be. The birther imaginings about Barack Obama? Just a silly conspiracy theory, latched onto by an attention seeker who has a peculiar penchant for them. The “Mexican” Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel incident? Asinine, inappropriate, a terrible attack on the judiciary by an egocentric man who imagined that the judge didn’t like him. The white supremacists’ march in Charlottesville? The president’s comments were absolutely idiotic, but he couldn’t possibly have been referring to those self-described Nazis as “good people”; in his sloppy, inarticulate way, he was referring to both sides of the debate over Civil War statues, and venting his anger about being criticized.

No, I thought, President Trump was boorish, dim-witted, inarticulate, incoherent, narcissistic and insensitive. He’s a pathetic bully but an equal-opportunity bully — in his uniquely crass and crude manner, he’ll attack anyone he thinks is critical of him. No matter how much I found him ultimately unfit, I still gave him the benefit of the doubt about being a racist. No matter how much I came to dislike him, I didn’t want to think that the president of the United States is a racial bigot.

But Sunday left no doubt. Naivete, resentment and outright racism, roiled in a toxic mix, have given us a racist president. Trump could have used vile slurs, including the vilest of them all, and the intent and effect would have been no less clear. Telling four non-white members of Congress — American citizens all, three natural-born — to “go back” to the “countries” they “originally came from”? That’s racist to the core. It doesn’t matter what these representatives are for or against — and there’s plenty to criticize them for — it’s beyond the bounds of human decency. For anyone, not least a president.

I don’t know what game these two are playing but it’s becoming untenable.

.

Sebastian Gorka, political savant

Sebastian Gorka, political savant

by digby

Sebastian Gorka wearing his Hungarian Nazi Ally uniform at the inaugural

QOTD:

Celebrity has become as important in politics as it has in media. I think Obama was our first celebrity president.

Gorka is one of those awful, unamerican immigrants so maybe he’s never heard of a guy named Ronald Reagan, a movie and TV star, who became the leader of the conservative movement, Republican Governor and President — more than 40 years ago.

.

No, racism isn’t a big winner in a diverse nation of immigrants and people of color. Even Trump’s people know that.

No, racism isn’t a big winner in a diverse nation of immigrants and people of color

by digby

Greg Sargent makes an astute observation about this fatuous spin in which Trump’s racism is actually god for the Republicans:

In the closing days of the 2018 elections, President Trump’s political guru, Brad Parscale, rolled out a massive TV ad campaign featuring a worried suburban mom fussing over her daughter. The woman told herself that everything would be okay, because of Trump’s economy — yet the spot did not feature Trump himself.

This ad, Parscale said at the time, was targeted toward “independent voters” and “suburban mothers.”

Meanwhile, Trump was sending the military to the border, demonizing asylum seekers as criminal invaders, and attacking Democrats as socialists, with some GOP ads tying then-House candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Nancy Pelosi. Republicans then lost more than 40 House seats, making Pelosi the speaker — to no small degree due to desertions by suburban women like the one in Trump’s own ad.

Now that Trump is continuing his racist attacks on nonwhite progressive lawmakers, this political dualism is on display once again. Trump is confidently proclaiming that these attacks will deliver victory in 2020 — which is a claim about his blue-collar white base — yet the real headwinds Trump faces are among those very same more upscale and suburban white voters.

Trump just unleashed a new tweetstorm aimed at the four nonwhite congresswomen he has been targeting, accusing them of “vile” and “hateful” and “pro-terrorist” rhetoric, and bashing the Democratic Party for refusing to take on the “Radical Left.”

Trump sees this as a winner, claiming that he cleverly forced the party to defend Ocasio-Cortez and “the Squad,” and this is “Not good for the Democrats!” Some pundits have endorsed this idea, suggesting this is the turf Trump wants 2020 fought upon.

Similarly, Trump campaign operatives tell The Post’s Jacqueline Alemanythat this is brilliant politics. One claims Trump’s attacks “reinforced in the minds of many Americans that the Democratic Party is the party of AOC and Omar.”

Trump advisers made this same boast in 2018

What’s strange about this argument is that it pretends the last major national election never happened. Indeed, it’s worth recalling that Trump allies made an almost identical boast in the runup to the 2018 elections.

“I want them to talk about racism every day,” former Trump adviser Stephen K. Bannon said in August 2017. “If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats.”

“The Democratic Party is at grave risk of completely marginalizing itself,” Trump adviser Stephen Miller said in the summer of 2018, scoffing at the party’s alleged embrace of “absolutist anti-enforcement positions,” and of “vile” MS-13 members.

In August 2017, the racial battle was over Confederate statues. In 2018, it was over caravans of asylum seekers. Now it’s over young, nonwhite lawmakers who are criticizing America, for which they are being told by the president of the United States that they should “go back” to the countries of their ancestry, even though three of them were born in the United States.

But in all these three cases, the argument is basically the same: The Democratic Party is defined by a race-obsessed fringe, which means it can’t win a national majority. In the Bannon-Miller mythology, a silent majority agrees with Trump on immigration and is repelled by Democratic race-baiting, and a nationalism that fuses this cultural message with Trump’s economic agenda will durably hold that majority.

But, as the ad featuring the worried suburban woman showed, even some of Trump’s own advisers didn’t believe this. They needed to decouple the economy from Trump and his nationalism and nativism, to win back independents and suburban women.

But it was too late. David Drucker reported that even Republicans privately admitted Trump’s immigration focus — his hate and nativism — helped cost the GOP the House by alienating those constituencies.

Given this history, why would anyone credulously accept Trump’s spin that similar race-baiting will be a huge winner this time around?

They are trying to move him toward attacking socialism instead of women of color but it’s not going to work. For him, it’s all about racism — because he’s a racist and he believes his base voters are too. And sadly, he is right. They are. And now they expect their president to “tell it like it is” which means dogwhistling is not going to be enough.

But they cannot win without at least a few of those suburban moms and independents…

.

Oh look, even more enemies of “the people”

Oh look, even more enemies of “the people”

by digby

“Coastal elites” are partnering with the “Fake news media” to become the enemies of the people.

I’m pretty sure they’re talking about the 66 millions people who didn’t vote for Trump in 2016. They don’t all live on the coasts but they’re allied with the “coastal elites” like me. So, they are all unAmerican.

We are all foreigners in our own country now.

.

Trump as disease by @BloggersRUs

Trump as disease
by Tom Sullivan

Mental health experts have eschewed diagnosing the acting president from afar. Donald Trump biographer David Kay Johnston is not a health care professional. He has no such qualms. On Monday night’s “Hardball,” Johnston declared to host Chris Matthews, “We have a mentally ill person in the White House, someone who is deranged … He is deeply mentally ill.”

Europeans dislike Trump but experience less outrage, Johnston explained, because “they’ve had centuries of mad kings and crazy warlords and other rulers who were nuts.”

Perhaps it is time to consider that Trump’s particular form of madness is contagious.

In the wake of presidential outbursts against Democratic women of color in Congress, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina acted as Trump’s wingman. Graham piled on, declaring the four women of The Squad, “a bunch of communists.” Graham railed, “They hate Israel, they hate our own country. They’re calling the guards along our border, Border Patrol agents concentration camp guards. They accuse people who support Israel of doing it for the Benjamins. They’re anti-Semitic. They’re anti-America.”

Graham, who once described Trump as a “race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot” is now all-in on Trumpism. On “The View” Monday, Meghan McCain observed that Graham, a man she once saw as an uncle, is no longer the same person:

“The problem is you’re making this about race,” she exclaimed. “You’re making this about racism. You’re making this about what’s truly American, and it’s all these old racist dog whistles that have plagued this country for so long, and for me as the conservative representative on this show, I was so upset coming back yesterday.”

Whatever is happening with him, McCain said, Graham “is not the person I used to know.”

Whatever. White nationalists are delighted.

The contagion is not isolated to Graham nor to Trump’s border guards. He has gleefully thrown fuel on hot coals to earn himself TV face time, distract attention as he’s so skilled at doing, and to remind the base he needs for 2020 theirs is still a white man’s country.

The symptoms Graham openly displays are not a new malady, writes Jamelle Bouie:

It is important to say that none of this is new to American life. Americans as early as the founding generation believed whiteness was a prerequisite for the exercise of republican virtue. Before the Civil War, there was a decades-long movement to send free and freed blacks back to Africa based on the theory that black people were unfit for and incompatible with democratic life. America’s most restrictive immigration laws were rooted in the idea this was, as the popular 19th-century phrase had it, a “white man’s country,” inherently threatened by the presence of nonwhites and non-Anglo-Saxons, not to mention women.

Trump, in other words, isn’t an innovator. His theory of citizenship is an old one, brought back from the margins of American politics and expressed in his crude, demagogic style. And it has found a comfortable place in a Republican Party that elevates its narrow, shrinking base as the only authentic America and would rather restrict the electorate than persuade new voters.

Trumpism is a form of mass hysteria rooted in historic racial animosity. More game show host than “reality” TV star, the acting president simply used his celebrity to make racism acceptable again in impolite company. One can imagine him looking out from his wing chair, wagging his finger, and announcing, “You’re lynched.”

Lindsey Graham, talking shit out of both sides of his mouth

Lindsey Graham, talking shit out of both sides of his mouth

by digby

They’re communist, antisemites who hate America but it’s wrong to attack them personally?. What?

Trump enthusiastically retweeted this twisted little bit of advice and talked about it later in his unhinged press avail. He disagreed that he should “aim higher” thinking Graham was saying he should tell only Senators to go back to their shithole countries.

I’m not kidding.

Congress is no longer necessary

Congress is no longer necessary

by digby

More executive action:

The Trump administration announced Monday it will move to end asylum protections for most Central American migrants in the government’s latest major attempt to restrict the influx of migrant families coming to the United States.

The new rule says asylum-seekers at the southern border who pass through another country and do not seek asylum there will not be eligible for the protection in the U.S., according to a statement from the departments of Justice and Homeland Security.

As a practical matter, it means that migrants coming from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador cannot seek asylum if they didn’t first do so in Mexico. The rule would also apply to many other asylum-seekers who come to the U.S. southern border from other countries.

“Until Congress can act, this interim rule will help reduce a major ‘pull’ factor driving irregular migration to the United States and enable DHS and DOJ to more quickly and efficiently process cases originating from the southern border, leading to fewer individuals transiting through Mexico on a dangerous journey,” acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan said in the statement.

Attorney General William Barr called the interim final rule a “lawful exercise of authority provided by Congress to restrict eligibility for asylum.”

The change is a unilateral move by the Trump administration and has not been agreed to by Mexico. American officials were negotiating a similar deal with Guatemala, which would have required immigrants from El Salvador and Honduras to apply for asylum there. But that deal, and a meeting with Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales, was abruptly called off Sunday after the Guatemalan Constitutional Court ruled against the proposal.

The new rule is subject to three exceptions, according to the statement. The exceptions were for migrants who did apply for protection in at least one of the countries and were denied, migrants who demonstrate they meet the definition of a “victim of a severe form of trafficking in persons,” or came to the U.S. through only a country or countries that were not parties to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the 1967 Protocol, or the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

The rule is set to be published in the Federal Register on Tuesday and would be effective immediately, according to the statement.

It is likely to face a legal challenge from immigrant rights and civil liberties groups.In the past, federal judges have blocked other attempts by the administration to change the asylum policy, most notably the president’s effort to deny the protection to anyone who did not enter the U.S. through a legal port of entry.

The American Civil Liberties Union said Monday morning it would “sue swiftly” over the rule.

“The Trump administration is trying to unilaterally reverse our country’s legal and moral commitment to protect those fleeing danger,” Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the Immigrants’ Rights Project at the ACLU, said in a statement. “This new rule is patently unlawful and we will sue swiftly.”

Under U.S. and international law, a person may seek asylum based on persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution because of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group. As a signatory to an international asylum treaty, the U.S. has a legal obligation to provide protection and certain rights to people who arrive at the border seeking asylum.

It’s pretty clear that the US no longer believes it has a “moral or legal commitment” even to it’s own citizens unless they lick Donald Trump’s boots.

.
.