Skip to content

Month: July 2019

The Trump Doctrine: bully allies, suck up to dictators and reverse anything Obama did

The Trump Doctrine: bully allies, suck up to dictators and reverse anything Obama did

by digby

It’s not complicated:

Sir Kim Darroch described the move as an act of “diplomatic vandalism”, according to the Mail on Sunday.

It says the memo was written after the then Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson appealed to the US in 2018 to stick with the nuclear deal.

Under that agreement Iran agreed to limit its sensitive nuclear activities.

It would also allow in international inspectors in return for the lifting of crippling economic sanctions.

However, President Trump did not think that the deal went far enough.

The newspaper reports that after Mr Johnson returned to the UK from the US, Sir Kim wrote that President Trump appeared to be abandoning the nuclear deal for “personality reasons” because the pact had been agreed by his predecessor, Barack Obama.

The British ambassador is said to have highlighted splits amongst US presidential advisors and that the White House did not have a “day-to-day” strategy of what to do following withdrawal from the deal.

The paper reports that Sir Kim wrote a memo to Mr Johnson, saying: “The outcome illustrated the paradox of this White House: you got exceptional access, seeing everyone short of the president; but on the substance, the administration is set upon an act of diplomatic vandalism, seemingly for ideological and personality reasons – it was Obama’s deal.

“Moreover, they can’t articulate any ‘day-after’ strategy; and contacts with State Department this morning suggest no sort of plan for reaching out to partners and allies, whether in Europe or the region.”
[…]
The first memos, which emerged a week ago, saw the then UK ambassador refer to the Trump administration as “clumsy and inept”.

He seems like a very perspicacious fellow to me.

His view of the Iran deal was the view of some partisan idiot at a Trump rally. He believes he can make “deals” that only favor the US and in some cases that may even be possible. The new NAFTA deal seems to have worked that way, but the improvements were only on the margins and the other two countries are led by mature people who understood it made more sense to appease him on this one. 

But Iran? Nope. They have zero incentive to come back and do a deal with a country led by an imbecile who has made America’s signature on a treaty not worth the paper it’s written on.  After watching Trump treat Kim Jong Un like his best buddy after he succeeded in becoming a nuclear power, the lesson is very clear.

.

.

The reckoning by @BloggersRUs

The reckoning
by Tom Sullivan

Seen from a safe distance the Jeffrey Epstein saga echoes Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut. Or a subplot of Caligula, as Michele Goldberg’s headline writer suggests of the sitting administration.

Indeed, the Washington Post’s Helaine Olen references Eyes Wide Shut in describing how the Epstein scandal “blows holes through the foundational myths of our time.” No, not “greed is good,” although that is related:

The major lie of the age of wealth inequality is that the moneyed are somehow better than the rest of us day-to-day working schlubs. The aristocracy of prewar Europe had their bloodlines. Our latter-day meritocratic aristocrats, we are told, possess the modern equivalent, which is extraordinary intelligence. The slothful working class are slaves to short-term pleasure. The rich, on the other hand, are disciplined. They wake up early, and they refuse to live beyond their means.

Bullshit. All of it. It is a myth the rich build around themselves the way they build walls around their compounds. It is the excuse they give for hoarding wealth as a hedge against whatever demons haunt people like Epstein. Those who receive only crumbs deserve their crumbs. Winners have better genes, believes a game-show host of a president who, while he lives in a gold-plated penthouse, cannot even competently act president.

Epstein, a convicted sex offender, used money of questionable provenance and his network of rich friends and associates to obtain a sweetheart deal from Florida prosecutors and to avoid hard jail time. He returned to a social scene that tsk-tsked his conviction and allowed him to prey again and again on underage girls until his re-arrest on New York charges.

Olen doubts even seers could have foretold the end of this age of excess might unfold from a “scandal involving sex abuse of children.” She continues:

Our era is one of exploding and all but unpunished crime by the wealthy and connected. Millions of homeowners lost their homes to foreclosures due to rampant fraud among mortgage providers, but not one senior banking official spent even an hour in jail for the financial crisis. Women are treated not as equals but with contempt, potentially subjected to horrifying treatment in the workplace for the crime of wanting to earn a living and get ahead. The ongoing investigations into such characters as Trump, Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen reveal few cared about cash laundering, tax fraud and shady financial scams that targeted working-class people.

It is premature perhaps to predict “the empty and sickening bromides [that] justify obscene wealth and power and privilege” will evaporate like the demons of Bald Mountain at the pealing of the church bell. But if rung clearly and loudly enough it may yet happen.

In fiction, there eventually comes a reckoning. Good triumphs. Wicked men face punishment. Witches melt. Nazis’ faces, too. Whether life will imitate art in these times remains in the balance. These are not normal times.

Nonetheless, the craving to see wrongs righted and good triumph remains hard-wired into a species that understands itself through its stories.

It is that craving that propels the joyful warriors who addressed Netroots Nation on Saturday morning. Women of color determined to right past wrongs told their stories of hardship and triumph. The fierceness they bring to the fight for justice is something not seen in this country in my lifetime.

What felt different this year in Philadelphia, the largest Netroots conference ever, was the sense of focus and purpose. More first-time attendees came than attended the first-ever conference in 2006. More diversity. More fierceness. More unity of purpose. More determination to cure the rampant inequities sustained by the excess embodied by Epstein, this administration, and a business culture that encourages victimizing others in pursuit of profit. As Sen. Elizabeth Warren says regularly (and did again on Saturday), it is a system that works great for the rich and powerful but not so much for the rest of us.

Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart once said of pornography, “I know it when I see it.” The question that may decide whether a reckoning is truly at hand is whether Americans still have eyes to recognize the pornographic nature of the system that leaves Epstein, Ailes, Weinstein, Donald Trump, and other rich and powerful men and women unaccountable. The activists in Philadelphia want to end it. Too many Americans are still too hypnotized by it to see it for what it is.

Summertime Blus Part Two: Best BD re-issues of 2019 (so far) By Dennis Hartley @denofcinema5

Saturday Night at the Movies

Summertime Blus Part Two: Best BD re-issues of 2019 (so far)

By Dennis Hartley

Since we’re halfway through 2019 (already?) I thought I’d apprise you of some of the latest and greatest Blu-ray reissues I’ve picked up so far this year. Any reviews based on Region “B” editions (which require a multi-region Blu-ray player) are noted as such; the good news is that multi-region players are now more affordable! Picking up where we left off last week in Part I, in alphabetical order:

Hedwig and the Angry Inch   (Criterion Collection) – It’s your typical love story. A German teen named Hansel (John Cameron Mitchell) falls for a G.I., undergoes a less than perfect sex change so they can marry, and ends up seduced and abandoned in a trailer park somewhere in Middle America. The desperate Hansel opts for the only logical way out…he creates an alter-ego named Hedwig, puts a glam-rock band together, and sets out to conquer the world. How many times have we heard that tired tale? But seriously, this is an amazing tour de force by Mitchell, who not only acts and sings his way through this entertaining musical like nobody’s business, but directed and co-wrote (with composer Steven Trask, with whom he also co-created the original stage version). Criterion’s image and audio quality is outstanding; extras are plentiful and enlightening.

I Wanna Hold Your Hand (The Criterion Collection) – This was the feature film debut for director Robert Zemeckis and writer Bob Gale, the creative tag team who would later deliver Back to the Future and Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Sort of a cross between American Graffiti and The Bellboy, the film concerns an eventful “day in the life” of six New Jersey teenagers. Three of them (Nancy Allen, Theresa Saldana and Wendy Jo Sperber) are rabid Beatles fans, the other three (Bobby Di Cicco, Marc McClure and Susan Kendall Newman) not so much. They all end up together in a caper to “meet the Beatles” by sneaking into their NYC hotel suite (the story is set on the day the band makes their 1964 debut on The Ed Sullivan Show). Zany misadventures ensue. Zemeckis overindulges on door-slamming screwball slapstick, but the energetic young cast and Gale’s breezy script keeps this entertaining romp moving along. Criterion’s 4K remaster is superb, and extras include two shorts that Zemeckis made while a film student at USC.

The Landlord  (Kino-Lorber) – Hal Ashby’s 1970 social satire follows the travails of a trustafarian (Beau Bridges) who buys a run-down Brooklyn tenement, with initial intentions to evict current residents and renovate (much to the chagrin of his blue-blood parents, who scoff at his “liberal views”). The landlord’s sincere but awkward attempts to “relate” to his black tenants is sometimes milked for laughs, other times for dramatic tension-but always rings true-to-life. Top-notch ensemble work, featuring Lou Gossett (with hair!), Susan Anspach (hilarious as Bridge’s perpetually stoned and bemused sister) and Diana Sands. The scene where Pearl Bailey and Lee Grant get drunk and bond over a bottle of “sparkling” wine is a classic. Ashby and screenwriter Bill Gunn’s observations about race relations in America are dead-on (and still timely). Image transfer is sharp. Extras include interviews with Beau Bridges, Lee Grant, and producer Norman Jewison.

Mikey and Nicky  (Criterion Collection) – You could call Elaine May’s 1976 mob drama the anti-Godfather. In fact, its verité-style portrayal of two mobbed-up pals in a desperate quandary is so workaday that it even makes suburban dad Tony Soprano look like some stylized hoity-toity version of a “gangster”. May’s film is “a night in the life” of Nicky (John Cassavetes), a low-rent bookie who has used up all the good graces of some very serious made guys and now fears for his life. Holed up in a cheap hotel room and on the verge of a breakdown, he calls on his pal Mikey (Peter Falk) to help him brainstorm out of his mess. A long dark night of the soul lies ahead. The loose, improvisational rawness in many scenes may grate on some (especially those unfamiliar with Falk’s previous collaborations with Cassavetes; the pair had by then developed a unique shorthand and that takes some acclimation). Ned Beatty is on hand as an exasperated hit man. The new 4K scan of the film looks true-to-life (much of it was photographed using available light).

Someone To Watch Over Me   (Shout! Factory) – This crime thriller may be one of director Ridley Scott’s less-heralded (if not nearly forgotten) films but is one of my favorite neo-noirs of the 80s. The 1987 release stars Tom Berenger as a married NYC police detective from a working-class neighborhood who is assigned to bodyguard a Manhattan socialite (Mimi Rogers) after she becomes a key witness in a murder case. Initially, their relationship is strictly professional, but…well, you know. Granted, the narrative may be somewhat familiar, but the film is stylish, sumptuously photographed (by Steven Poster), and well-acted (Berenger and Rogers have great chemistry, and Lorraine Bracco is a standout as Berenger’s wife). The transfer is gorgeous. Extras include interviews with Poster and screenwriter Howard Franklin (no commentary track).

Stranger than Paradise  (Criterion Collection) – With this 1984 indie classic, Jim Jarmusch established his formula of long takes and deadpan observances on the inherent silliness of human beings. John Lurie stars as Willie, a brooding NYC slacker who spends most of his time hanging and bickering with his buddy Eddie (Richard Edson). Enter Eva (Eszter Balint), Willie’s teenage cousin from Hungary, who appears at his door. Eddie is intrigued, but misanthropic Willie has no desire for a new roommate, so Eva decides to move in with Aunt Lotte (Cecillia Stark), who lives in Cleveland. Sometime later, Eddie convinces Willie that a road trip to Ohio might help break the monotony. Willie grumpily agrees, and they’re off to visit Aunt Lotte and Eva. Much low-key hilarity ensues. Future director Tom DiCillo did the black and white photography, evoking strange beauty in the stark, wintry, industrial flatness of Cleveland and environs. Criterion’s restoration is beautiful. Extras include commentary by Jarmusch and Edson, and Jarmusch’s 1980 color feature debut Permanent Vacation (also restored).


Year of the Dragon   (Warner Brothers) – This brutal, visceral crime thriller/culture clash drama from 1985 is one of writer-director Michael Cimino’s most polarizing films. Co-written by Oliver Stone and based on Robert Daley’s novel, Cimino’s follow-up to his critically drubbed 1980 epic Heaven’s Gate (no pressure!) divided both critics and audiences with its uncompromising take on gang violence, the international drug trade, and ethnic stereotyping. Mickey Rourke stars as a decorated NYC police captain newly assigned to Chinatown who embarks on a single-minded mission to bust up the various criminal enterprises run by the powerful neighborhood triads (by any means necessary). Rourke’s combative “cop on the edge” (also a Vietnam vet) is equal parts Popeye Doyle and Archie Bunker; his casual racism suggests that he may have not been the ideal political choice for this posting. Rourke really pulls out all the stops. John Lone also does a great turn as his sociopathic nemesis, a politically savvy rising star in the Chinese mob. The film has garnered a cult following over the years (guilty). As usual, Warner skimps on extras (there’s a commentary track by Cimino), but image and sound quality are tops.

Zachariah   (Kino-Lorber) – Originally billed as “the first electric western”, George Englund’s 1971 curio barely qualifies as a “western”, but it certainly is plugged in, turned-on and far out, man. Perhaps a more apt title would have been “Billy the Kid vs Siddhartha”. No, seriously-it is (allegedly) based on Herman Hesse’s classic. Well, there is a protagonist, and he does go on a journey…but that’s where the similarities end. Still, I think it’s a hoot, with a screenplay concocted by members of The Firesign Theater (who later fled in horror from the finished product). It does have its moments; mostly musical. My favorite scene features the original James Gang (Joe Walsh, Dale Peters and Jim Fox) rocking out in the middle of the desert as our hero (John Rubinstein) makes his grand entrance (it presages a scene in Blazing Saddles, where Sherriff Bart tips his hat to Count Basie and orchestra as they perform amidst the sagebrush). Also look for Country Joe and the Fish and fiddler Doug Kershaw. Don Johnson co-stars. Not for all tastes, but cult movie buffs will enjoy it. Great transfer and enlightening new interview with Rubinstein.

Film buffs may want to check these out on Amazon Prime day, Monday the 15th to see if there’s a deal for these collector’s discs.


Summertime Blus Part I, with reviews of eight more new blu-rays here.

More reviews at Den of Cinema
On Facebook
On Twitter

— Dennis Hartley


.

They’re honoring the KKK now

They’re honoring the KKK now

by digby

Ok. Cool. This is fine:

Despite public outcry, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee (R) re-signed a proclamation Thursday declaring July 13 as Nathan Bedford Forrest Day in the state, honoring the Ku Klux Klan grand wizard and former Confederate general… 

Forrest is known to history as a bloodthirsty slave trader and the KKK’s very first grand wizard. In 1864, he led Confederate soldiers to commit what’s known as the Fort Pillow Massacre, according to The Washington Post. Three hundred Union soldiers, including 200 black soldiers, were murdered there, often at point-blank range.

Even this guy thinks this is a bad idea:

But hey, this is your GOP dude:

.

You think the Democrats are spineless? Take a look at the opposition.

You think the Democrats are spineless? Take a look at the opposition.

by digby

Paul Ryan is a coward but this current bunch of Trump bootlickers is even worse. What won’t they do or say to curry the favor of their Dear Leader?

House Republicans are pushing back on former Speaker Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) criticisms of President Trump, with some arguing the Wisconsin Republican didn’t yield as much power over the president’s decisionmaking as the ex-lawmaker suggested in a new book.

According to an excerpt of “American Carnage” by Politico reporter Tim Alberta, Ryan argued that the president is worse off since he and other officials left their top posts in Washington.

“We helped him make much better decisions, which were contrary to kind of what his knee-jerk reaction was,” Ryan said. “Now I think he’s making some of these knee-jerk reactions.”

Several congressional Republicans who worked with Ryan in the House took issue Friday with his characterization.
“I think it’s a little bit of revisionist history,” one Republican member told The Hill.

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), whose group was often at odds with Ryan, said that while Ryan may have attempted to tamp down policies he didn’t agree with, the president’s instincts on policy resonated more with GOP voters.

“Paul Ryan’s advice typically served to push the president in a direction that would make the swamp happy but most of the people who voted for Donald Trump unhappy,” Meadows said. “The Speaker missed the real reason why the president consistently enjoyed higher approval ratings than anyone in Republican leadership.”

Other Republicans said they felt top lawmakers like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Trump allies within House GOP leadership like Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) had the president’s ear on key issues more so than Ryan.

“McCarthy and McConnell had significant impact — it wasn’t just the Ryan show,” another GOP member said.

The working relationship between the two leaders got off to a rocky start, with Ryan expressing reservations about Trump during the 2016 campaign before eventually endorsing him. And while they managed to come together to achieve significant successes, namely the 2017 GOP tax law, divisions over policy between the two Republican leaders and personality clashes were at times very public, with Trump blasting Ryan on social media.
The president slammed Ryan for coming out against his plan to nullify birthright citizenship, dismissed his push to embrace free trade and opted not to support a stop-gap spending bill, leading to Ryan ending his congressional career during what became the longest government shutdown in U.S. history.

“I’d remind people that Paul Ryan was never a Trump supporter and he bailed out on our conference,” one Trump ally told The Hill. “He is no longer relevant.”

Other members dismissed Ryan’s assertion in the book that Trump “didn’t know anything about government.”

Scalise — who highlighted the accomplishments Ryan and Trump achieved despite “not seeing eye to eye” on certain issues — defended the president’s understanding of government by citing Trump’s remarks on different policy areas during a trip to Camp David and their discussions while working on the 2017 GOP tax law.

“I wouldn’t agree with that assessment if that’s what Paul said, because I was in meetings with Paul, and the president, on a number of issues and the president is well versed on domestic policy,” he told reporters.

Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.) said while Trump’s approach to governing may be unconventional, he doesn’t see his decision to break the status quo as a negative.

“I think, you know, the power of President Trump is he’s a disrupter,” Reed said. “The status quo of D.C. has to change and the president was changing it. And I’m a big fan of a disrupter in this town, because this town, if you think it’s working, then you’re in the wrong business.”

Even though Ryan kept much of his criticisms of Trump to a minimum while in office, multiple lawmakers said they were not surprised by his decision to go public now.

“I think it’s been a long time coming. I don’t think anybody on this floor is surprised that the two of them have a moment,” one GOP member said. “Much of that was contained when he was Speaker, but now that he’s not he says what he feels.”

Trump was quick to attack Ryan following the release of the experts, accusing Ryan of being a “the failed V.P. candidate & former Speaker of the House, whose record of achievement was atrocious” and casting blame on him for the loss of the House on Twitter.
[…]
Veteran Republican strategist Doug Heye said that while some lawmakers have criticized Ryan for not saying more while in office, they may not be taking into account the level of pressure and difficulty of the circumstances he faced.

“Paul Ryan was under enormous pressure again, you know, to kind of keep the House as a functioning, working organization. And it’s why, you know, I had tremendous empathy for him. And sometimes I was disappointed, sure, but I always had sympathy for that for the job that he was trying to do,” Heye said.

“You know, any member who’s critical of Ryan on this — and there may be valid criticisms — but if they’re saying it on the record, that also tells me, you know, that they want to be seen as kind of reassuring this White House: I’m with you every step of the way,” he said.

Gag. Ryan was a weasel, of course and a total phony. So I don’t care that he’s being shunned by his own party. But the sickening display of sycophancy toward Trump from Ryan’s former colleagues is enough to make you gag.

.

So we’re going to turn Guatemala into a refugee camp? Out of sight out of mind?

So we’re going to turn Guatemala into a refugee camp? Out of sight out of mind?

by digby

Why not? We turned Guantanamo into a prison camps and we routinely “render” people to countries for the purpose of torture, so why not this?

Early next week, according to a D.H.S. official, the Trump Administration is expected to announce a major immigration deal, known as a safe-third-country agreement, with Guatemala. For weeks, there have been reports that negotiations were under way between the two countries, but, until now, none of the details were official. According to a draft of the agreement obtained by The New Yorker, asylum seekers from any country who either show up at U.S. ports of entry or are apprehended while crossing between ports of entry could be sent to seek asylum in Guatemala instead.

During the past year, tens of thousands of migrants, the vast majority of them from Central America, have arrived at the U.S. border seeking asylum each month. By law, the U.S. must give them a chance to bring their claims before authorities, even though there’s currently a backlog in the immigration courts of roughly a million cases. The Trump Administration has tried a number of measures to prevent asylum seekers from entering the country—from “metering” at ports of entry to forcing people to wait in Mexico—but, in every case, international obligations held that the U.S. would eventually have to hear their asylum claims. Under this new arrangement, most of these migrants will no longer have a chance to make an asylum claim in the U.S. at all.

“We’re talking about something much bigger than what the term ‘safe third country’ implies,” someone with knowledge of the deal told me. “We’re talking about a kind of transfer agreement where the U.S. can send any asylum seekers, not just Central Americans, to Guatemala.”

From the start of the Trump Presidency, Administration officials have been fixated on a safe-third-country policy with Mexico—a similar accord already exists with Canada—since it would allow the U.S. government to shift the burden of handling asylum claims farther south. The principle was that migrants wouldn’t have to apply for asylum in the U.S. because they could do so elsewhere along the way. But immigrants-rights advocates and policy experts pointed out that Mexico’s legal system could not credibly take on that responsibility. “If you’re going to pursue a safe-third-country agreement, you have to be able to say ‘safe’ with a straight face,” Doris Meissner, a former commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, told me.

Until very recently, the prospect of such an agreement—not just with Mexico but with any other country in Central America—seemed far-fetched. Yet last month, under the threat of steep tariffs on Mexican goods, Trump strong-armed the Mexican government into considering it. Even so, according to a former Mexican official, the government of Andrés Manuel López Obrador is stalling. “They are trying to fight this,” the former official said. What’s so striking about the agreement with Guatemala, however, is that it goes even further than the terms the U.S. sought in its dealings with Mexico. “This is a whole new level,” the person with knowledge of the agreement told me. “In my read, it looks like even those who have never set foot in Guatemala can potentially be sent there.”

The article explains that there is a presidential election coming and the government is hoping to get into the Trump administration’s good graces. But there’s one little problem with this scenario:

The biggest, and most unsettling, question raised by the agreement is how Guatemala could possibly cope with such enormous demands. More people are leaving Guatemala now than any other country in the northern triangle of Central America. Rampant poverty, entrenched political corruption, urban crime, and the effects of climate change have made large swaths of the country virtually uninhabitable. “This is already a country in which the political and economic system can’t provide jobs for all its people,” McFarland said. “There are all these people, their own citizens, that the government and the political and economic system are not taking care of. To get thousands of citizens from other countries to come in there, and to take care of them for an indefinite period of time, would be very difficult.”

Although the U.S. would provide additional aid to help the Guatemalan government address the influx of asylum seekers, it isn’t clear whether the country has the administrative capacity to take on the job. According to the person familiar with the safe-third-country agreement, “U.N.H.C.R. [the U.N.’s refugee agency] has not been involved” in the current negotiations. And, for Central Americans transferred to Guatemala under the terms of the deal, there’s an added security risk: many of the gangs Salvadorans and Hondurans are fleeing also operate in Guatemala.

That’s a feature, not a bug. Trump wants to stop migration through “deterrence.” if he can get the Guatemalan government to do the dirty work for him he can just blame it all on the shithole countries’ inability to deal with their problems and wash his hands of the whole thing.

What he wants more than anything is to see the border crisis ended and take credit for it. What happens to the migrants isn’t of concern.

.

What Atrios Says by tristero

What Atrios Says 

by tristero

As he often is (since the early 2000s!), Duncan is spot on:

This Is Our Emergency 

We are operating concentration camps and treating humans (including children) who aren’t even accused of any crimes (not that this would make it OK but I am not naive about our current prisons) in conditions which would cause a dog kennel to be shut down and the House leadership is currently mad at people who are pointing out that the Dems gave Trump $4 billion to open more concentration camps without any conditions. 

Vote them all out.

Emphasis added.

The Trumpkin Village showed the cages filled with male prisoners to assure their base they aren’t all soft

The Trumpkin Village showed the cages filled with male prisoners to assure their base they aren’t all soft

by digby

The most prosperous nation on earth, one which brags of record highs on its stock market and record low unemployment, is showing the world these conditions to prove it’s a cruel, small, vengeful nation in order to appease its narcissistic barbarian of a leader.

I had assumed they’d only show footage of a nice, clean facility where everyone was smiling and singing. They did that. But they also allowed this to be shown which very clearly shows that the supposedly very pious ultra Christian Vice President and GOP leadership don’t give a damn about these people. They don’t even attempt to talk to them. They appear to be looking at them as if they are in a zoo, being lectured about their mating habits by the zoo-keeper.

That was the plan. Deterrence is the plan. And this is the plan:

Here’s the pool report of the encounter:

After negotiating with the VP’s office, pool was taken into an outdoor portal atthe McAllen Border Station around 5 pm, where almost 400 men were in cagedfences with no cots. The stench was horrendous.

The cages were so crowded that it would have been impossible for all of the men to lie on the concrete. There were 384 single men in the portal who allegedly crossed the border illegally. There were no mats or pillows — some of the men
were sleeping on concrete.

When the men saw the press arrive, they began shouting and wanted to tell us they’d been in there 40 days or longer. The men said they were hungry and wanted to brush their teeth. It was sweltering hot. Agents were guarding the cages wearing face masks.
Water was available outside the fences, and agents said the men could leave and
get water when the press wasn’t there.

Most of the men did not speak English and looked dirty. They said they’d been there for 40 days or more upon questioning from the pool.

We were pulled out of the portal within 90 seconds, and a White House official said the Secret Service had expressed opposition to the Vice President going in.

He briefly went into the room.

“I was not surprised by what I saw,” Pence said later at a news conference. “I knew we’d see a system that was overwhelmed.”

“This is tough stuff,” he said. He said he was calling for Democrats to fund more ICE beds and had pushed for more DHS spending because of the situation, including a $4.6 billion humanitarian aid package that he negotiated.

The pool was then arranged a briefing with Michael Banks, the patrol agent in
charge of the McAllen situation.

He said the men are allowed to brush their teeth once a day and have been told that. “We currently have 88,000 toothbrushes,” he said.

He said they were given deodorant after showering but conceded many of the men had not showered for 10 or 20 days because the facility previously didn’t have showers.

He said the facility now has a trailer shower, which came in Thursday.

He said the longest any man had been there was 32 days. He said the facility was cleaned three times a day, but it did not seem that way, and that it was air conditioned, but it did not feel that way.

He said the men were given three hot meals a day from local restaurants, along with juice and crackers.

He said the men could not get cots because there would be no room for them all to sleep if they were given cots. They are given a Mylar blanket, he said. The thin blankets could be heard cracking.

He said another 275 women were living in air conditioned Army repurposed tents
.
Just before that, we were rushed into a small command-center room, called the “bubble,” where immigration officials were briefing the Republican senators and Vice President. Crowded cells could be seen all around. 382 men were in the cells, many of them appeared quite young and some shirtless, and they pressed their faces up against the window to see the commotion.

The men are in the cells or in the portal until ICE can take them, Banks said. The Vice President asked a few questions but most of the talking was done by Sen. Lindsey Graham.

Before, the Vice President briefly visited the technical operations center, where he saw troops and border patrol agents monitoring 15 sensor cameras on the wall. The screens would go red when they would sense movement of people crossing the border. The cameras monitor 47 miles of the border, officials said.

He stayed for about 90 seconds and shook one officer’s hand.

Pence was clearly discombobulated by the sights and smells because he forgot that the Democrats passed the funding bill.

We spend millions on the president’s golf games and skimming from the taxpayers to support his businesses. They just blew through many more for that stupid July 4th pageant in DC for no good reason. But we have disgusting, overcrowded internment camps within our own borders. And apparently, we want the world to see that.

Because then foreigners will respect us.

.

How Christian is he? by @BloggersRUs

How Christian is he?
by Tom Sullivan


Image from tweet by @jdawsey1

Vice President Mike Pence toured two migrant detention facilities in Texas on Friday along with pool reporters. The first, in Donna, Texas, was two months old and cleaner, giving Pence the opportunity to go after Democratic critics for calling the facilities “concentration camps.”

The second in McAllen? Well….

MCALLEN, Tex. — When Vice President Pence visited a migrant detention center here Friday, he saw nearly 400 men crammed behind caged fences with not enough room for them all to lie down on the concrete ground. There were no mats or pillows for those who found the space to rest. A stench from body odor hung stale in the air.

When reporters toured the facility before Pence, the men screamed that they’d been held there 40 days, some longer. They said they were hungry and wanted to brush their teeth. It was sweltering hot, but the only water was outside the fences and they needed to ask permission from the Border Patrol agents to drink.

Pence appeared to scrunch his nose when entering the facility, stayed for a moment and left.

Media trainers at Netroots Nation in Philadelphia on Friday told a packed room body language conveys more message than words. Pence’s nose “scrunch” falls into that category.

“I was not surprised by what I saw,” Pence said later at a news conference. “I knew we’d see a system that was overwhelmed.”

He added: “This is tough stuff.”

This is one of those situational ethics affairs in which public Christians eager for government to enforce their religious views against others typically rediscover rendering unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s. When it serves their needs to insist the U.S. is a Christian country whose constitution Jesus himself helped draft, professing the primacy of Christian morality is in order. When their xenophobic agendas require them to crack down on strangers in their land, suddenly separating church and state is conservative common sense.

We’ve already seen what kind of compromises Pence is prepared to make — and what dogs he’s prepared to lie with — when his ambition is more important to him than his faith. No on should hold their breath for him to take a Christian stand now.