Skip to content

Month: July 2019

Donald Trump’s patriotic quotes

Donald Trump’s patriotic quotes

by digby

Q    Mr. President, (inaudible) political feud that you’re having with Congresswoman Omar and the rest of those Democrats, is it a good thing politically for you?  Or do you think it turns people off?

THE PRESIDENT:  I don’t know if it’s good or bad politically.  I don’t care.  But when people are speaking so badly, when they call our country “garbage” — think of that.  That’s worse than “deplorable.”  When they call our country “garbage,” I don’t care about politics.  I don’t care if it’s good or bad about politics.  Many people say it’s good.  I don’t know if it’s good or bad.  I can tell you this: You can’t talk that way about our country, not when I’m the President.

This is just a short list of some of the patriotic rhetoric of our president, courtesy former Ted Cruz adviser Rick Tyler on MSNBC:

  • The United States is a laughing stock
  • The United States a foolish country
  • The United States is a stupid country
  • The United States is a dumb country
  • We’re not great
  • The country is going to hell in a handbasket
  • The military is going to hell
  • The United States is like a third world country
  • The United States is dying
  • The American Dream is dead

Of course, Trump hates everything but himself and the people who lick his boots (and even that’s conditional on how enthusiastically they lick them) so it’s not a specific attack on America. But we have never had a leader who clearly loathed America the way he does. He viscerally hates at least half the population and every single leader who came before him.

This idea that he’a big patriot is just … ridiculous.

,

I’m Guessing Zero Time by tristero

I’m Guessing Zero Time

by tristero

The executives of the corporations that created the opioid epidemic are nothing less than the real life analogs of Stringer Bell and Avon Barksdale.

Aside from the fact that Bell and Barksdale were fictional drug dealers, — and these guys actually live and breathe and actually made obscenely large fortunes— there are, two additional differences:

1. They’re white.
2. They will never see the inside of a prison

Funny how that works.

UPDATE: Yes, I know that the drug dealers in The Wire were based on real people. But the mostly anonymous pushers at Mallinckrodt, Walmart, CVS, and Rite Aid? They aren’t based on real people. They are real people. And they’re going to get away with it.

It’s Not Enough by tristero

It’s Not Enough 

by tristero

Shouting “Send her back” in addition to “Lock her up” means that it’s now normal for Trump’s legions to openly, collectively, and regularly bray their racist hate to the world.

It won’t be enough for them to stop there. So far, we’ve only had some genuinely sick individuals foment violent Trumpist terrorism. But now, expressing collective racism is (once again) completely normal in mainstream America.

Racism is now so normal that editors at The New York Times don’t think Trump’s racist remarks are racist enough to officially label as racist. Instead they persist in cravenly leaving it up to their columnists, as if it’s a fucking opinion that Trump’s remarks are racist. Do we have to have lots of modern versions of the above picture posted to the right wing web sites before they get it? Apparently, we do.

Of course, Maddow is right. He’s doing this to distract from his corruption, his criminality, and his wanton destruction of the US government. But we must pay attention because in a very real sense, his racism is central to it all — if you have such hatred and contempt as Trump does for the real, multi-ethnic, politically diverse America of 2019, why not loot it and stomp on it and wreck it?

I’m genuinely terrified and I’ll remain terrified until he is impeached and removed from office.

2020 could be very close folks. Racist whites are the minority but the electoral college was made for them.

2020 could be very close folks. Racist whites are the minority but the electoral college was made for them.

by digby

Nate Cohn of the NY Times wrote a scary analysis showing that Trump could lose the popular vote by five million people and still win the electoral college — which actually seems to be Trump’s strategy:

President Trump’s approval ratings are underwater in national polls. His position for re-election, on the other hand, might not be quite so bleak.

His advantage in the Electoral College, relative to the national popular vote, may be even larger than it was in 2016, according to an Upshot analysis of election results and polling data.

That persistent edge leaves him closer to re-election than one would think based on national polls, and it might blunt any electoral cost of actions like his recent tweets attacking four minority congresswomen.

For now, the mostly white working-class Rust Belt states, decisive in the 2016 election, remain at the center of the electoral map, based on our estimates. The Democrats have few obviously promising alternative paths to win without these battleground states. The president’s approval ratings remain higher in the Sun Belt battlegrounds than in the Rust Belt, despite Democratic hopes of a breakthrough.

The president’s views on immigration and trade play relatively well in the Northern battlegrounds, including among the pivotal Obama-Trump voters.

There are signs that some of these voters have soured on his presidency, based on recent polling. There is also reason to think that white working-class voters who supported Mr. Trump were relatively likely to stay home in last November’s midterm elections.

A strategy rooted in racial polarization could at once energize parts of the president’s base and rebuild support among wavering white working-class voters. Many of these voters backed Mr. Trump in the first place in part because of his views on hot-button issues, including on immigration and race.

Alone, the president’s relative advantage in the Electoral College does not necessarily make him a favorite to win. His approval rating is well beneath 50 percent in states worth more than 270 electoral votes, including in the Northern battleground states that decided the 2016 election.

And just because racial polarization could work to the president’s advantage in general doesn’t mean that his particular tactics will prove effective. The president’s campaign rally on Wednesday night seemed, for a time, to go too far even for him: on Thursday he disavowed the “send her back” chants that supporters directed toward a congresswoman who immigrated to the United States as a refugee. (By Friday, he was declining to condemn the chants.)

But Mr. Trump’s approval rating has been stable even after seemingly big missteps. And if it improves by a modest amount — not unusual for incumbents with a strong economy — he could have a distinct chance to win re-election while losing the popular vote by more than he did in 2016, when he lost it by 2.1 percentage points.

Yikes.

Ron Brownstein doesn’t see it quite so starkly. He tweeted this:

One part of EC debate that confuses me: even in the key blue-collar states (WI/PA/MI) relying on recapturing lots of working-class whites isn’t the only way to win. Even apart from turnout, Trump’s overt racism could provide Ds bigger margin w/other groups-col+ whites, young than in 16.

And despite his racial appeals, his hold on working-class whites, especially women, in MW isn’t as strong as in South. In 18 exits 46-48% of non-college white women disapproved of him in WI/PA/MI, largely because of the ACA.

Attacking immigrants may help with some but doesn’t erase those concerns. WI is indeed toughest for Ds (most blue-collar white), but it’s not like open racism is electoral Kryptonite even there. There are real offsetting costs, plus the implications for AZ (where majority of under-40 population is already minority).

The demagogue in chief is a powerful inspiration to racists everywhere, to be sure. But he’s not gaining any racist voters. They all loved him from the get. If this is his strategy it solves the dilemma for Democrats once and for all. There is no margin in trying to poach any of his voters. They have to get everyone else out to vote.

.

“If they can land a man on the moon …” by @BloggersRUs

“If they can land a man on the moon …”
by Tom Sullivan

Fifty years ago today, landing on the moon became a benchmark for human achievement. The world held its breath in those last moments as the Eagle lander, seconds worth of fuel left, settled onto the lunar surface.

“Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed,” radioed Neil Armstrong.

Charlie Duke at mission control replied, “Roger Tranquility, we copy you on the ground. You got a bunch of guys about to turn blue. We’re breathing again. Thanks a lot.”

The United States had achieved President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision of humans landing on the moon before the end of the 1960s. We would return them home safely. Thereafter, “If they can land a man on the moon” became both a declaration of human achievement and a demand we solve other insurmountable problems through the same American hard work, grit and ingenuity. We are still waiting for a president to lead a climate change moon shot.

Fifty years later, we’ve got a boatload of problems and a nation in retrenchment led by an ignorant, racist xenophobe and a coward. Add to that, he is a small-minded, white-nationalist demagogue with a DSM’s worth of instability. Worse still, he has a following numbering somewhere around 40 percent of U.S. voters.

In 1969, inspired by Kennedy’s vision and rivalry with the Soviet Union led by Russia, Americans dreamt of reaching for the stars. Fifty years later, a large percentage are eager to follow the acting president into the abyss.

Fifty years later, Russia is still an American adversary. But having lost the race to the moon and its empire, Russia has chosen to boost its global stature not through inspiring human achievement, but by working to collapse its rivals through stealth, burglary, and industrial-strength lies. The acting U.S. president is eager to play along.

The problem of perfecting this union (as well as protecting it against malicious adversaries) is not our technology but our lack of wisdom and garden-variety human foibles. Hugo and Nebula Award winner Mary Robinette Kowal issued a Twitter thread Friday explaining that for all the technical wizardry behind space travel we have yet to satisfactorily solve the problem of peeing and pooping in space.

For all our chest thumping about ‘Murica and freedom, e pluribus unum remains beyond the grasp of many of our fellow citizens. Anyway, the phrase is foreign, dontcha know.

The Atlantic’s Adam Serwer examines the challenge of addressing the white nationalism stoked by the acting president and abetted by a supine Republican Party. Specifically, he addresses this week’s speech in Greenville, NC in which the acting president’s audience chanted “Send her back! Send her back!” about Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), a Somali immigrant serving in Congress. Trump primed the crowd for the chant by suggesting four freshmen women of color (including Omar) should go back to the countries they came from. The other three are native-born Americans.

For all the ugliness in the history of this republic, “America has not been here before,” Serwer writes:

Ilhan Omar’s prominence as a Republican target comes not, as conservatives might argue, simply because her policy views are left-wing. Neither is it because, as some liberals have supposed, she is an unmatched political talent. She has emerged as an Emmanuel Goldstein for the Trumpist right because as a black woman, a Muslim, an immigrant, and a progressive member of Congress, she represents in vivid terms a threat to the nation Trumpists fear they are losing.

To attack Omar is to attack a symbol of the demographic change that is eroding white cultural and political hegemony, the defense of which is Trumpism’s only sincere political purpose. Many of the president’s most outrageous comments have been delivered extemporaneously, when he departs from his prepared remarks. Last night, though, his attacks on Omar were carefully scripted, written out by his staff and then read off a teleprompter. To defend the remarks as politically shrewd is to confess that the president is deliberately campaigning on the claim that only white people can truly, irrevocably be American.

Serwer argues for defending Omar, whatever her politics — “you needn’t like her at all” — “because the nature of the president’s attack on her is a threat to all Americans—black or white, Jew or Gentile—whose citizenship, whose belonging, might similarly be questioned.”

Today we celebrate a monumental human achievement from half a century ago. The courage, commitment and science that adventure required has yet to be rallied to cleanse the darkness in human hearts. The acting president has no interest in addressing that problem. for him, it is not a problem, but an asset to be exploited. While not clairvoyant, I might venture his own heart is darker than most. As a fictional president said of a rival a quarter century ago, whatever the problem is America needs solving, Donald Trump is uninterested in solving it. “He is interested in two things, and two things only: making you afraid of it, and telling you who’s to blame for it.”

“If multiracial democracy cannot be defended in America,” Serwer concludes, “it will not be defended elsewhere. What Americans do now, in the face of this, will define us forever.” That is on us. “If they can land a man on the moon,” perhaps we may yet save this republic from this ugly nationalism. Yet, we still can’t figure out how to poop cleanly in space. God help us we are forever defined by the shit left behind by Donald J. Trump.

Friday Night Soother

Friday Night Soother

by digby

Wolf pup edition:

After the newest litter of European Wolves began emerging from their den a few weeks ago, keepers at Longleat Safari Park weren’t exactly sure how many pups were in the litter. They eventually determined that parents Eliska and Jango were raising seven pups!

Once it was known that pups had been born, the care team allowed the family to bond without any interference from staff. Keepers would occasionally glimpse the pups when Eliska and Jango moved the pups between three separate underground dens in their woodland enclosure.

“As the pups spend their first few weeks underground it makes it very difficult to work out exactly how many there are. Initially we thought there were only five, so to discover there’s actually seven of them was a wonderful bonus,” said Longleat’s team manager for carnivores, Amy Waller.

The pups, which weighed less than a pound when born, are now able to eat small amounts of meat but will not be fully weaned until eight to 10 weeks of age.

This is the second litter born at the Safari Park in the last year and boosts the pack size to 14.

“The pups’ older siblings have also been getting involved with transporting them from den to den but have still not entirely got the hang of holding them the right way up so mum and dad do have to occasionally intervene,” added Amy.

Wolf packs have a highly complex social structure and each individual knows its place in the pack hierarchy. In the wild, wolves depend on cooperation within the pack for survival, both in hunting and in raising offspring.

Wild Wolves were eradicated from most of Western Europe in the 19th century and they have been extinct throughout the United Kingdom for more than 250 years.

Thanks to several Wolf reintroduction programs, the wild Wolf population in Europe is now thought to include 12,000 individuals in 28 countries.

There are established packs in Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Portugal, Spain and Italy with numbers also on the rise in parts of France and Germany. In 2011, Wolves were also reported in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Via Zooborns

Please, Ivanka and Melania are not moderating influences. They are complicit.

Please, Ivanka and Melania are not moderating influences. They are complicit.

by digby

Oh come on

CBS News has learned President Trump took a lot of heat from his family over the racist chants at a campaign rally in North Carolina on Wednesday. He heard from first lady Melania Trump, his daughter Ivanka and Vice President Mike Pence.

Mr. Trump on Thursday disavowed the chants of “send her back” and said he tried to stop it. “Well, number one, I think I did, I started speaking very quickly,” he said.

But the video tells a different story. The president stands in silence for nearly 15 seconds, looking around the arena. When Mr. Trump resumed his speech, he made no mention of the chant, which started after he attacked Rep. Ilhan Omar. The rally left Republicans once again answering for the president.

CBS News learned that Mr. Trump spoke to several members of his inner circle about how to react to the chant. He weighed the pros and cons of softening his tone, worried supporters would not like it.

But ultimately, he declared unhappiness. Congressional Republicans also expressed concerns to Pence and asked him to relay the message to the president.

Bullshit.
 
Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick called this out all the way back in 2017.

[Ivanka] Trump sees herself as a force for good. She sees her role in her father’s White House as a formal-yet-informal ambassador for generalized human kindness. Her brother has let us know that it is the free-floating human-like kindness of Ivanka that led Donald Trump to bomb the crap out of Syria last weekend. Is that even a job? Is she even that kind?

When it comes to President Trump, one must either begin from the proposition that he is a mentally ill huckster, unfit to serve, or one must start with the intention of continuously parsing each momentary action (the “give him a chance, he’s not that bad, the people have spoken” approach). And if you are of the camp that chooses to parse each jog and twist in the current madness, you can certainly make the case that though Ivanka does not, in fact, “know what it means to be complicit,” she certainly does seem to hope that “time will prove that I have done a good job and much more importantly, that my father’s administration is the success that I know it will be.”

Indeed, if you are of the camp that maintains that Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, despite flagrantly self-enriching and profiteering from the Trump presidency, are vitally important “moderating influences” on the narcissist to which they answer, you can surely assert, as Jared Kushner has been known to do when challenged, that he is doing what he believes is right with “complicated facets,” and that he is, in his own view, “navigating it appropriately.” The argument amounts to the proposition that having elected a nutball, anyone who performs a braking function on the nutball is by definition a national hero.

Semantically, you might be able to make this point. But ethically and morally, you would probably be wrong to do so. Put aside for a moment the very real allegations about very real wrongdoing by this family. Ivanka and Jared’s justifications of their actions rest on the claim that destiny has forced them to play outsize parts in this administration, and that as profoundly and intrinsically good people they are simply trying to play that role with performative goodness. This defense—that anyone who accuses Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner of complicity is opposed to their sane and benevolent intercessions on behalf of America’s good people—is without doubt the most morally and ethically shallow claptrap offered up to public discourse since Trump took office. I think it’s time to label it as such.

And Melania is the person who wore that coat. She knew exactly what she was doing.

.

More evidence against our criminal president

More evidence against our criminal president

by digby

The government released several search warrant documents related to their investigation of Michael Cohen Thursday — and apparently revealed that the investigation into hush-money payments made on Trump’s behalf has ended.

The newly unsealed documents are search warrants preceding the raids on Cohen’s office and residence in April 2018. The media had wanted them released earlier but the prosecutors said the investigation was ongoing. They’ve apparently folded up shop, presumably because of the DOJ policy that you can’t indict the president. Or Bill Barr made his wishes known.

So, whatevs.

To recap: Last August, Cohen pleaded guilty for violating campaign finance law by arranging hush money payments for two women who claimed affairs with Trump: Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels. (He began serving a three year prison sentence for those crimes and bank fraud charges this May.)

The unsealed search warrant materials lay out investigators’ understanding of the hush money investigation as of early 2018 — before the raids on Cohen’s office, the public revelation of the investigation’s existence, and Cohen’s guilty plea. The new documents can be found at these links: Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3, Exhibit 4, Exhibit 5, Exhibit 6, Exhibit 7, and Exhibit 8.

The main takeaway from the documents is that there’s ample evidence that Trump and his campaign press secretary Hope Hicks were in close communication with Cohen as he tried to buy Stormy Daniels’s silence toward the end of the 2016 campaign.

An FBI agent wrote that in October 2016, in the days following the publication of the Access Hollywood tape in which Trump bragged about groping women, Cohen “exchanged a series of calls, text messages, and emails” with the following people:

  • Keith Davidson (Stormy Daniels’s attorney)
  • David Pecker and Dylan Howard of American Media Inc. (the publisher of the National Enquirer)
  • Donald Trump and Hope Hicks

For instance, the day after the tape was released, on October 8, Hicks called Cohen — and, per the FBI agent, Trump joined the call. “I believe this was that this was the first call Cohen had received or made to Hicks in at least multiple weeks,” the agent wrote. Shortly afterward, Cohen called Pecker and then received a call from Howard.

Investigators surmised these discussions were about how to prevent more women from coming forward with stories about Trump. Already at this point, Cohen had worked with Pecker and Howard to pay off Karen McDougal, another woman who said she had an affair with Trump, so AMI could get exclusive rights to her story (and bury it). But the Access Hollywood tape’s release was the reason for new urgency.

The documents also reveal:


On October 26, 2016, less than 30 minutes after speaking with Trump, Cohen opened a bank account for his infamous shell company, Essential Consultants LLC. Later that day, Cohen transferred $130,000 to the account, which he’d later use to pay Daniels.)

After arranging the payment for Daniels, Cohen had a brief conversation with Hope Hicks.

After receiving an audio file of Daniels denying any affair with Trump, Cohen had a phone conversation with Kellyanne Conway (Trump’s campaign manager).

On November 4, 2016, Cohen texted that Trump was “pissed” about a Wall Street Journal article that would reveal the payment to McDougal.

So yes, this was a cover-up, and Trump was likely in the loop. It was also a criminal cover-up — Cohen admitted knowingly violating campaign finance laws with the hush money payment. He said last year he did so at Trump’s direction, and these documents appear to substantiate that claim.
What happened to the hush money investigation, then?

But the reason we’re seeing all these new documents is that, per prosecutors, there’s no longer an ongoing investigation that merits their continued sealing.

That’s a new development, because it had appeared that others — Trump Organization executives, and even Trump himself — were in some legal jeopardy from the then-continuing probe as recently as a few months back.

For instance, Cohen claimed to have spoken to Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg about how to set up the Karen McDougal payment. Weisselberg was also involved in paying back Cohen for the money he paid Stormy Daniels — in 2017, he split the money into several monthly payments that the company falsely described as “legal expenses.” (Prosecutors investigating the payments reportedly gave Weisselberg immunity for testimony last year, though that did not mean he “flipped” on Trump, as some surmised. The New York Times reported that the immunity grant “was narrow in scope.”)

Then there’s Trump himself, who directed the illegal payments. Why isn’t he being charged? Have prosecutors put it aside only because he’s the sitting president, and can’t be indicted? Or were there evidentiary concerns? (To prove the violation, prosecutors would have to prove that Trump knew the payments were illegal — a tall order.)

Last week’s CNN report that the investigation would soon wrap up contained a curious tidbit. In January, prosecutors asked to interview Trump Organization executives on the topic — but, per “people familiar with the matter,” prosecutors then “never followed up” on that request and “the interviews never took place.”

As Josh Marshall of TalkingPointsMemo points out, Bill Barr was confirmed as attorney general in February, the month after that interview request. The following month, in March, Robert Khuzami — the prosecutor who oversaw the hush money probe — left government. Per the New York Times, he told colleagues his departure was “unrelated to any political pressure.” But now, the investigation has fizzled out.

It’s really looking as if the only person who will be punished for Trump’s sins is that sad sack Michael Cohen.

The criminal in the White House just carrying on with impunity is destroying the last vestige of faith anyone can have in the American justice system. The Democrats look like a bunch of chickens with their heads cut off running around in circles squawking and clucking and letting him get away with it, so it also appears that the political system is completely impotent to deal with him.

The best we can hope for is to get him out of office. I’m completely losing hope that he will ever face any accountability for his crimes. I suspect that if he loses the election he’ll just go out and be a right-wing media star, making money hand over fist scamming his deluded cultists and remaining the chief spokesman for the GOP for some time to come.

If the justice system actually takes the step of going after this miscreant once he’s out of office, I will be shocked. There is a strong resistance among normal people, for obvious reasons, to jailing defeated presidential candidates much less defeated presidents. It’s not too hard to see where that would go under an Attorney General like Bob Barr.

It would be much more likely to be seen as legitimate if it happened to a president who had been impeached and then defeated, of course. But that’ doesn’t appear as if it will happen so …

I think he’s going to get away with all of it.

.

Deficit, Schmeficit: Rush admits it was always a sham

Deficit, Schmeficit: Rush admits it was always a sham

by digby

I think we all know that the Republicans will once again relentlessly fearmonger the deficit once a Democrat is in the White House. That’s simply how this works. The GOP runs up the debt and then they hector the Democrats into cutting it and taking the heat from their own voters for cutting valuable programs. It’s a nice little scam that’s been going on since Reagan.

However,  Trump’s tax cuts and military spending spree goes much farther than anyone before him so it’s going to be a quite something to see the utter hypocrisy on display. Make no mistake, they will do it anyway.

However, you might want to make note of this, just for posterity:

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh admitted that Republican fear-mongering over the federal deficit under President Obama was “bogus,” while defending the deficit’s explosive rise to $1 trillion under President Trump.

During Limbaugh’s show on Tuesday, a caller suggested that Republicans should nominate a young fiscal conservative instead of Trump, citing the rising deficit. Limbaugh dismissed the concerns, declaring that fiscal conservatism was basically a sham all along.

“Republicans can nominate a young, potentially two-term president, one that believes in fiscal conservatism,” the caller told Limbaugh. “We’re gonna have — in 2019, there’s gonna be a $1 trillion deficit. Trump doesn’t really care about that. He’s not really a fiscal conservative. We don’t, we have to acknowledge that Trump has been cruelly used.”

“Nobody is a fiscal conservative anymore,” Limbaugh shot back. “All this talk about concern for the deficit and the budget has been bogus for as long as it’s been around.”

That’s quite the statement from Limbaugh, who spent the entirety of the Obama years attacking the president over rising deficits.

In 2009, Limbaugh ranted that Obama was a “coward” without the “spine” or “gonads” to admit he was responsible for driving up the deficit (rather than the two wars President George W. Bush started while cutting taxes).

In 2011, Limbaugh bizarrely claimed that Obama was “the architect of deficits and debt unheard of in this nation.”

The late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., spent the entirety of his 2008 presidential campaign warning about rising deficits, CNN noted. The 2010 rise of the Tea Party, which fueled massive Republican gains in that year’s midterm elections, was fueled largely by claims that federal spending was out of control. Former House Speaker Paul Ryan made an entire career out of rhetoric decrying the rising national debt. Then he led the charge to approve a $1.5 trillion tax cut for the rich and corporations, leading to the $1 trillion deficit Republicans apparently no longer care about.

Trump himself vowed to be a savior, promising that he would eliminate not just the budget deficit but the entire $22 trillion debt within two terms as president during his 2016 campaign.

“It can be done. … It will take place and it will go relatively quickly. … If you have the right people, like, in the agencies and the various people that do the balancing … you can cut the numbers by two pennies and three pennies and balance a budget quickly and have a stronger and better country,” Trump told Fox News host Sean Hannity in 2016.

Later on Tuesday’s show, Limbaugh doubled down on his newfound believe that fiscal conservatism was never authentic, accusing former Rep. Mark Sanford, R-S.C., of fear-mongering for expressing concern over the rising national debt under Trump. (Sanford has proposed mounting a campaign against Trump for the Republican nomination in 2020.)

“How many years have people tried to scare everybody about the deficit?” Limbaugh asked. “The years, how many decades of politicians tried to scare us about deficit the national debt, the deficit, any number of things. And yet, here we’re still here and the great jaws of the deficit have not bitten off our heads and chewed them up and spit them out.”

Lol!

.