Skip to content

Month: August 2019

Republicans spend millions to help AOC spread her climate message

Republicans spend millions to help AOC spread her climate message

by digby

Heh:

She’s right. Most Republicans will reject anything she says just because they reject anything anyone not affiliated with their cult says. But you never know if some young person or a Republican with doubts might see it …

.

Goper hysteria over Comey is just precious

Goper hysteria over Comey is just precious

by digby

Today James Comey is found guilty of technically breaking FBI rules — after he was fired — by keeping and distributing some of his own memos to the file memorializing the president’s lawbreaking behavior.

History will properly classify this as necessary whistleblowing. Comey is a complicated figure to say the least. But while his decision to put his thumb on the scale in the election to benefit Donald Trump, Trump’s ungrateful reaction to his unwillingness to lick his boots in the White House is even worse.

And while the right-wingers are all throwing themselves on the fainting couch over Comey’s reprehensible behavior, let’s just look at yesterday’s news one more time:

President Trump is so eager to complete hundreds of miles of border fence ahead of the 2020 presidential election that he has directed aides to fast-track billions of dollars’ worth of construction contracts, aggressively seize private land and disregard environmental rules, according to current and former officials involved with the project.

He also has told worried subordinates that he will pardon them of any potential wrongdoing should they have to break laws to get the barriers built quickly, those officials said.

The same people who are in hysterics over Comey’s “rule-breaking” are still defending that today.

The lesson here is that any thoughts the Republicans are going to come to their sense if Trump is defeated in 2020 is a pipe dream. They are shameless hypocrites and they are proud of it. Avoiding impeachment or public hearings in order to preserve “norms” that will only be adhered to by one side is a joke. They have been going in this direction since Gingrich took over the messaging for the party in the 1990s.

This will end only when they are removed from power and live in the political wilderness for a long, long time.

.

The Art of Convenience by @BloggersRUs

The Art of Convenience
by Tom Sullivan

There is no bottom. We keep looking for one, though. This scandal, this one. Surely, this one will prompt action to remove a president who violated his oath of office (emoluments) before even removing his hand from the Bible. He is Kurt Russell’s “Ego” from Marvel’s “Guardians” series. His purpose in life is to fill the universe with “Me.”

Black as his soul and topped with spikes, the border wall he promised to build is a monument to Himself. And, Greg Sargent writes this morning, to “his megalomania; his demagoguery about desperate migrants; his contempt for empirical, reality-based governing; his prioritizing of the base’s prejudices and fantasies above all else.” He’s instructed subordinates to break the law to build it by November 2020. He’ll use his pardon power to protect them, if needed.

Ah, a White House official explained, but he was only “joking.” (If he were Ann Coulter, he’d roll his eyes at being called out and toss his hair. Then again, maybe not.)

And he never lies. He just has a “blunt way of speaking.” Over 12,000 times now.

Sargent summarizes the Washington Post findings on where his wall project stands:

  • Trump has privately instructed aides to skirt laws and regulations to get the wall built faster — and told them he will pardon them if necessary. A White House official claims Trump is joking when he offers pardons, but this obviously doesn’t make it acceptable. In fact, it stands as confirmation that Trump actually has said this — leaving his underlings in the position of interpreting it as a real directive and offer. This demands further scrutiny.
  • Trump has privately admitted a wall isn’t the best way to stop illegal immigration — but he has told top aides that if he fails to deliver, it would be a letdown to supporters heading into reelection. Indeed, in private meetings, Trump has justified this position by musing about the loud cheers his wall receives at rallies.
  • Trump has not delivered on the wall. Sixty miles of replacement barriers have been built during the Trump presidency — all in areas where infrastructure previously existed. This explains Trump’s anguish about getting more done faster.

And he is pressuring the Army Corps of Engineers to award the contract “to a company whose chief executive is a donor to one of his top GOP allies in Congress.”

Rep. David N. Cicilline (R.I.) tells the Post, “Sadly, this is just one more instance of a president who undermines the rule of law and behaves as if he’s a king and not governed by the laws of this country.” Cicilline added, “He is not a king, he is accountable.” As soon as we hear the rock hit the bottom of the pit.

But there is no bottom. Once you’ve separated children from their parents, separated nursing infants from mothers, locked them in cages, fed them expired food and forced refugees to go weeks without a shower or clean clothes, Bess Levin writes at Vanity Fair, “it’s a bit of a challenge to come up with your next act. Evil takes creativity.”

No problem (“problemo” ist verboten). The administration has cancelled the “medical deferred action” program that grants foreign-born children special immigration status. Letters are arriving around the country ordering them to leave the country within 33 days. For some, it is virtually a death warrant.

The Boston Globe Editorial Board writes, “Step by malicious step, the Trump administration is turning the American immigration system into an apparatus of appalling, intentional cruelty.”

Everything else is a grift. For himself. For his family. For his supporters. The law? The law is for punishing opponents when it is convenient and for ignoring when it is not. The king Himself is immune.

The Constitution? That too is a matter of convenience, both for this president and his party. Charlie Pierce’s answer to how Never Trumpers might rehabilitate themselves is simple: Lay off the franchise. Quit using the law to exclude inconvenient people from full participation. “The franchise is everything. If we all can’t agree on that, then none of the rest of it is worth a damn.” They should tell their attack dogs in state legislatures to get born again about that.

Pierce explains:

Make no mistake. The Republican Party at every level has abandoned any serious attempt at attracting any voters who are not voting for it right now. This is an odd phenomenon in American history, because every other party that fell into this kind of entropy disappeared within a year. The Federalists vanished because nobody wanted to be a Federalist anymore, and the people who ran the party decided against trying to break off any of the people buying what Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were selling across the street. This was stupid and suicidal. Our modern Republican Party realizes this, so it has found a way around the problem. It is easier to keep inconvenient people from voting than it is to find a way to appeal to any of them, and you can use the institutions of democratic government to do this.

Someone with access needs to tell the acting president he is not a king. To his face. Loudly. Not simply issue a statement to the papers. If it isn’t inconvenient.

It’s his prorogue-a-tive

 It’s his prorogue-a-tive

by digby

The process underlying this Brexit gambit today was news to me and I figures it probably was for some of you as well. This article in Foreign Policy explains a bit of it:

Niccolò Machiavelli had some advice on dealing with enemies. If you’re going to wound them, make sure they end up dead—or with an injury so great that they can never seek revenge. In dealing with his political enemies, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has failed the Prince’s test.

Johnson’s problem is this: He won the leadership promising to leave the European Union by Oct. 31 “come what may” and while there is a theoretical possibility the EU could offer him a deal he could get through Parliament, the chances of the Irish backstop—to which his coalition partners the Democratic Unionist Party object—being removed from the withdrawal agreement are, as Johnson himself might have put it, less than him being “reincarnated as an olive.”

Unless he is willing to see around one-third of Conservative Party voters defect to the Brexit Party, he has to be prepared to leave the EU without a deal.

(The food shortages and economic disruption that will cause will have a similar effect but would at least allow him to survive as prime minister a bit longer.)

The 2017 election, however, produced a Parliament opposed to leaving without a deal, which, through unconventional legislative maneuvering, passed a law by a single vote in April this year and forced then-Prime Minister Theresa May’s government to seek an extension of the Brexit negotiation period until Oct. 31.

A cross-party majority of members of parliament, including some who are still members of the Conservative Party, have been planning to repeat the maneuver. Over the summer, two trial balloons were floated to stymie this effort: to suspend (“prorogue”) Parliament so it can’t pass any such legislation again or to hold an election, which dissolves Parliament for the campaign period, but to make sure the election date itself occurs after Britain leaves the EU.

Both strategies ran into considerable opposition from MPs, the civil service, and even people who are now ministers in Johnson’s cabinet. Health Secretary Matt Hancock was opposed when running for the party leadership but has since gone silent on the matter. Amber Rudd, now Johnson’s work and pensions secretary was once opposed to prorogation, saying, “I think it’s outrageous to consider proroguing Parliament. We are not Stuart kings”—a reference to the decision of King Charles I of the House of Stuart to prorogue Parliament for over a decade in the mid-17th century, leading to the “eleven years’ tyranny,” civil war, and his eventual execution.

This prorogation will be shorter. It takes advantage of the fact that Parliament traditionally does not sit during Britain’s autumn party conference season to suspend Parliament between Sept. 12 and Oct. 14, adding about two weeks to the time it doesn’t sit. This deprives opposition lawmakers of valuable time and makes it harder for them to pass a law required to demand an extension.

It may be harder, but it is not impossible. Instead of eliminating their ability to strike at him, Johnson has given the opposition reason to do so, whereas before many of them had been prepared to wait until it was certain that he couldn’t negotiate some kind of modified Brexit deal. Anna Soubry, the former Conservative MP who now chairs the Independent Group for Change in Britain’s House of Commons, told Foreign Policy it has galvanized opposition: “Former members of the Cabinet who are absolutely furious and now see that what many of us have been saying to them which is that these people are ruthless … these people are now saying, ‘My god, you’re right.’” More circumspect pro-Europeans think it has accelerated opposition that would have otherwise happened during special parliamentary sittings convened during the conference season.

This raises the stakes. If opponents of a no-deal Brexit can neither pass special legislation nor defeat the government in a vote of no confidence, they will run out of options.


If opponents of a no-deal Brexit can neither pass special legislation nor defeat the government in a vote of no confidence, they will run out of options.

If, however, they do pass legislation, Johnson might decide to ignore it. They could ask the courts to enforce it, but Britain has not had to enforce judgements against an unwilling prime minister in the past. Normally the prime minister would have resigned in these circumstances. But in this case, his resignation would just cause an election, the date of which he is currently entitled to set at a point after the Brexit deadline.

Johnson’s second mistake was to pretend that this was merely the normal prorogation that happens between parliamentary sessions and allows a government to present a new legislative program, known as a Queen’s Speech, to Parliament. While a new parliamentary session was due—the last session ran for over two years, whereas most sessions last just one—and it is reasonable for a new prime minister to be able to set out the government’s legislative agenda, there is no reason it needs to be done right in the middle of the country’s most serious political crisis in a century.

On BBC Radio the afternoon after the parliamentary suspension had leaked to the press, Johnson argued that it was needed to allow the government to legislate for “infrastructure improvements.” In a country that hasn’t built a new airport runway in London for the entire time it’s been a member of the EU and whose new high-speed railway is over a decade late, this is laughable. As the speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, put it bluntly: “However it is dressed up, it is blindingly obvious that the purpose of prorogation now would be to stop Parliament debating Brexit and performing its duty in shaping a course for the country.” It simply looks too sneaky. And a snap opinion poll suggests that voters have smelled a rat. The poll from YouGov has only 27 percent supporting Johnson’s gambit, with 47 percent opposed. (The rest don’t know.)

What. A. Mess.

The world has gone mad …

Greedheads hire a professional prevaricator to tell them the truth

Greedheads hire a professional prevaricator to tell them the truth

by digby



This is sickening:

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, President Donald Trump’s former press secretary, has held discussions with Teneo, a global consulting firm started by former Clinton aides, about working together to advise corporate clients about the Trump administration, according to a former Teneo employee and two other people familiar with the matter.

Sanders would serve as an independent contractor and would not be employed by Teneo, these people said.

But she would act as a potentially valuable informal liaison who has maintained strong relationships with White House aides and other administration officials.

“They’ve got to walk into the room with someone who knows the White House,” said one of the people familiar with the arrangement. “They need someone to explain how the Trump thing operates.”

The only person on the planet with a worse reputation for dishonesty than Sarah Huckabee Sanders is Trump himself. Do they really think she will tell them the truth? Fergawdsakes, she’s running for office. She has no incentive to be honest with these people. She’ll collect a fat paycheck and stab them in the back.

And anyway, we know why they are hiring her. It’s so they can try to parlay some Trump connections into money for themselves. Even corporate America finds Trumpies too radioactive for that. The only company that will hire them now is Fox News.

.

From Russia with strings by @BloggersRUs [UPDATED]

We are very, very sorry. Super sorry. Very super-sorry

by digby

This morning Tom Sullivan wrote a blog post in this space called “From Russia with strings” referencing a Lawrence O’Donnell segment on last night’s “Last Word.” Later in the day he received a letter from Charles Harder, attorney for the president demanding that the post be retracted and an apology issued. The Hollywood Reporter has a full report on its web site explaining that the president’s lawyer sent these letters to MSNBC and others who referenced the program.

Mr Harder is the lawyer who successfully sued Gawker so obviously this little blog is no match for him. We do not have lawyers on staff or resources to hire them. NBC is fully capable of litigating any free-speech issues pertaining to the president of the United States and O’Donnell has backed off of his report.

So, Tom and I (as the proprietor of this blog) do hereby retract this post citing a major news organization. And we are so, so, so sorry that we ever even thought of doing such a thing on a blog in America in 2019. The President of the United States takes a very strong stand against public defamation and we should follow his fine example.

Moreover, let us go on record assuring the Trump Organization that we believe Donald Trump is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being we have ever known in our lives.

— digby

If this isn’t an impeachable offense, nothing is

If this isn’t an impeachable offense, nothing is


by digby

The WaPo:

President Trump is so eager to complete hundreds of miles of border fence ahead of the 2020 presidential election that he has directed aides to fast-track billions of dollars’ worth of construction contracts, aggressively seize private land and disregard environmental rules, according to current and former officials involved with the project.

He also has told worried subordinates that he will pardon them of any potential wrongdoing should they have to break laws to get the barriers built quickly, those officials said.

Trump has repeatedly promised to complete 500 miles of fencing by the time voters go to the polls in November 2020, stirring chants of “Finish the Wall!” at his political rallies as he pushes for tighter border controls. But the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has completed just about 60 miles of “replacement” barrier during the first 2½ years of Trump’s presidency, all of it in areas that previously had border infrastructure.

‘He always brings them up’: Trump tries to steer border wall deal to North Dakota firm

The president has told senior aides that a failure to deliver on the signature promise of his 2016 campaign would be a letdown to his supporters and an embarrassing defeat. With the election 14 months away and hundreds of miles of fencing plans still in blueprint form, Trump has held regular White House meetings for progress updates and to hasten the pace, according to several people involved in the discussions.

When aides have suggested that some orders are illegal or unworkable, Trump has suggested he would pardon the officials if they would just go ahead, aides said. He has waved off worries about contracting procedures and the use of eminent domain, saying “take the land,” according to officials who attended the meetings.

“Don’t worry, I’ll pardon you,” he has told officials in meetings about the wall.

They say he was joking. But dangling pardons is criminal. And since he pardons supporters like Joe Arpaio there is every reason to believe he’ll pardon people who help him.

I know it’s not a kitchen table issue and all but it seems like a ready made article of impeachment to me.

This should be too:

Trump’s determination to build the barriers as quickly as possible has not diminished his interest in the aesthetic aspects of the project, particularly the requirement that the looming steel barriers be painted black and topped with sharpened tips.

.

Is Trump hedging his bets on 2020?

Is Trump hedging his bets on 2020?

by digby

My Salon column this morning:

If I were a cynical person I might begin to wonder whether President Trump isn’t hedging his bets a bit on the 2020 election. It’s not that he doesn’t exude his usual delusional confidence, of course. The man has suffered no loss of self-assurance despite the blazing Dumpster fire that is his presidency. Nonetheless, he’s turned his focus a bit more obviously on his family business lately in a way that might suggest he feels that he’d better use his influence to boost his profits while he still has it.

For instance, Salon’s Shira Tarlo reported earlier this week on Trump’s stunningly inappropriate announcement that he was planning to use his Trump National Doral golf club in Florida as the host site for next year’s meeting of the G7. His comments sounded like nothing so much as one of those video pitches he and his daughter Ivanka used to sell the dodgy condo developments that inevitably ended up making money for the Trump Organization — and leaving the buyers and financial institutions holding the bag when the deals went south.

During last weekend’s G7 summit, Trump he acknowledged that the French did “a nice job architecturally” with Biarritz — one of the most renowned resorts in the world — and then began his spiel for his own golf club:

When reporters asked him at his final press conference what reassurances he could give the American people that he is not looking to profit off the presidency with such an event, Trump claimed that he has made a huge sacrifice by being president:

Well, I’ll tell you what: I’ve spent — and I think I will, in a combination of loss and opportunity, probably it’ll cost me anywhere from $3 to $5 billion to be president. And the only thing I care about is this country. Couldn’t care less. Otherwise, I wouldn’t have done it. 

People have asked me, “What do you think it costs?” And between opportunity, not doing — I used to get a lot of money to make speeches. Now I give speeches all the time. You know what I get? Zippo. And that’s good. And I did a lot of great jobs and great deals that I don’t do anymore. And I don’t want to do them because the deals I’m making are great deals for the country. And that’s, to me, much more important.

That “$3 to $5 billion” figure is a joke, of course. There is little reason to believe that the man who would probably still be starring in a stale reality show and selling Chinese-made consumer goods plastered with his name would be making anything close to that.

He went on to make the sales pitch all over again:

Note that that advertisement comes from an official government Twitter feed. The White House itself is now flogging the president’s private golf club.

Essentially, we had two infomercials for Trump’s Doral club broadcast all over the world that day. All the cable networks showed stock footage of the property as they reported the story. That’s a whole lot of free advertising right there.

That wasn’t the only sign that Trump may be thinking he needs to use his power to shore up the family business — because he may not be in office after 2020. He took another aggressively corrupt action last week that in fact dwarfs the millions he might make by forcing taxpayers and foreign governments to stage a major global event at his private club.

Recall that Trump has been on a tear against Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, over the Fed’s reluctance to lower interest rates as much or as quickly as the president would like. He even tweeted out a question last week asking (rhetorically, one supposes) whether Powell was a bigger enemy than Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump has been anxious for the Fed to goose the lagging economy, and the big stock market drops last week after he escalated his daft trade war with China undoubtedly rattled him. Trump seems to understand that his chances of re-election are substantially dimmed if the economy goes south over the next year.

But there may be more to it than that. If he begins to grasp that he may not be in office beyond . January 2021, his thoughts could be turning to more personal, pecuniary concerns that he can only affect while he’s the president. The Washington Post reported last week:

President Trump stands to save millions of dollars annually in interest on outstanding loans on his hotels and resorts if the Federal Reserve lowers rates as he has been demanding, according to public filings and financial experts. 

In the five years before he became president, Trump borrowed more than $360 million via four loans from Deutsche Bank for his hotels in Washington, D.C., and Chicago, as well his 643-room Doral golf resort in South Florida. 

The payments on all four properties vary with interest rate changes, according to Trump’s official financial disclosures. That means he has already benefited from falling interest rates that were spurred in part by a cut the Federal Reserve announced in July, the first in more than a decade — and his payments could drop by millions of dollars more annually if the central bank grants Trump’s wish and further lowers short-term rates, experts said.

He likes to pretend that a few million dollars mean nothing to him. But remember, before he became president he was fighting off claims of fraud from his branded developments and his specious “Trump University.” He almost certainly needs the money. According to the Post, Deutsche Bank extended the Trump Organization $364 million in loans, starting in 2012, through its slightly shady “private wealth division” rather than its normal lending unit.

Those funds went to buy the money-losing Doral resort and to renovate the Old Post Office in Washington, now the site of the Trump International Hotel, where anyone who wants to make a good impression on the the president can conveniently drop thousands of dollars. In fact, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday night that Attorney General Bill Barr is availing himself of that handy pass-through, booking a $30,000 Christmas party at the hotel.

I suspect that Trump’s main motivation in all this is to secure his re-election by goosing the economy with a rate cut. After all, his protection against legal action stems entirely from his position as president. But while he may have told the public that he’s no longer involved in the Trump family business, he is an inveterate liar and it’s almost certain he knows exactly what the Trump Organization’s bottom line is. If he has any inkling that his time might be up, he’s going to use the power of the presidency to save his company and his family fortune. That was, after all, the main reason he ran for president in the first place.

.

The daily journey of a Trump sycophant

The daily journey of a Trump sycophant


by digby

He may be a religious Never-Trumper but Michael Gerson’s description of the mental gymnastics among the Trump sycophants is enjoyable to read:

It is grotesquely fascinating to see President Trump’s apologists try to explain his most lunatic ideas and claims. It is a bit like watching someone choke down a sheep’s eye on a bet, then declare it fine dining. (Note to animal rights activists: This is a simile, not a recommendation.)

This process has a number of steps — the stages of servility. At first, there is stunned silence. (Did he really propose to buy Greenland?) Then the frantic search for hidden wisdom. (Climate change — which the president sometimes views as fake science — will melt Arctic ice, open sea lanes and turn Greenland into the Panama Canal of the north.) Then the determined Googling of historical precedents. (Harry S. Truman, it turns out, also contemplated a Greenland grab.) Then growing defiance. (Greenland has loads of zinc! Doesn’t America deserve zinc?!)

Trump’s idea of disrupting hurricanes with nuclear weapons — a suggestion he has denied making but almost certainly made — has duplicated some of these stages. According to Axios, one briefer who received Trump’s proposal was “knocked back on his heels.” “You could hear a gnat fart in that meeting,” a source recalled. An administration source tried to defuse the matter by pointing to Trump’s good intentions: “His goal — to keep a catastrophic hurricane from hitting the mainland — is not bad. His objective is not bad.” Which would be cold comfort to those with nuclear fallout in their backyard. The “bomb the hurricane” idea, it turns out, was also advocated in the decades after World War II. (During the early to mid-20th century, radioactive material had a somewhat milder reputation, being sometimes added to toothpaste, cosmetics, cigarettes, condoms and suppositories.) 

Are such ideas as the Greenland purchase and nuclear weather control dangerous? Not because they are likely to be implemented. Denmark’s prime minister stands in stout resistance to the first proposal. And between Trump’s suggestion in a briefing and the nuking of a future Hurricane Mindy are numerous steps, including (one would hope) the invocation of the 25th Amendment.

But we should not play down the importance of having a president with harebrained notions. We should not explain away the craziness.

Certainly the president should not be allowed to lie away the craziness. In the face of good reporting on Trump’s nuclear idea, his claim of “FAKE NEWS” is entirely unconvincing. We have reached the point where the president’s denial of a charge actually makes it more credible. Recall his suggestion that the “Access Hollywood” tape isn’t real. And the claimthat he never said Mexico would pay for the wall. And his claim that he never ordered White House counsel Donald McGahn to fire special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. And his claim that he never said Russia didn’t meddle in the 2016 election. And his claim that he never paid for the silence of a porn star. Self-serving deception by the president is now a justified expectation.

Yes, he is a crazy liar. But the larger point is that there are many, many Lindsey Grahams and Tom Cottons and Mick Mulvaneys dancing as fast as they can to create the illusion that he’s making sense and telling the truth.

They aren’t crazy. They are just self-serving liars.

.

He’ll cut Medicare. Of course he will.

He’ll cut Medicare. Of course he will.

by digby

Democrats should run with this. Trump will lie and say he doesn’t have any such plans but deep down all those senior Trump voters know that he’s a lying sack of garbage. They just think he’s been lying for them. This will nag them just a little bit:

While Republicans do not expect Trump to push for cuts while campaigning for reelection, they’ve apparently encouraged him to do so should he win a second term—a proposition to which President “I’m not going to cut Social Security, I’m not going to cut Medicare” has reportedly been receptive. “We’ve got to fix that,” Senator John Thune, the number two Republican in the Senate, told the Times. “It’s going to take presidential leadership to do that, and it’s going to take courage by the Congress to make some hard votes. We can’t keep kicking the can down the road. I hope in a second term, he is interested,” Thune said of Trump. 

“With his leadership, I think we could start dealing with that crisis. And it is a crisis.” Republicans, said Senator John Barrasso, who seems to regularly chat with the president, have “brought it up with President Trump, who has talked about it being a second-term project.”

His promises are worthless. He lies more than any human on the planet. And lots of people think that’s ok because they think he’s just making a larger point about something with which they agree.

But if Trump gets a second term he has no incentive to keep the base happy no matter what. He will be listening to the financial people who will tell him that his fortune is in danger from humungous deficits. He would be very likely to go into slash and burn cutting mode. And I think we know that if he can’t get it done legislatively he’ll find ways to do it through executive power.

Elders are terrible suckers for snake oil salesmen but they have always had a pretty good bullshit detector when it comes to Medicare and Social Security. If Trump wins he’s going to say he’s “reforming” Medicare by cutting it. It remains to be seen if senior Republicans are so loyal that they’ll believe that.

.