Skip to content

Month: November 2019

Come and see the show by @BloggersRUs

Come and see the show
by Tom Sullivan


U.S. Congressmen Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows speaking at the 2018 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). Photo by Gage Skidmore via Flickr/CC BY-SA 2.0.

Former PBS host Bill Moyers tells CNN he fears for the United States, “for the first time, because a society, a democracy, can die of too many lies. And we’re getting close to that terminal moment, unless we reverse the obsession with lies that are being fed around the country.” Moyers and colleague Michael Winship bought a full page ad in the New York Times urging PBS to rebroadcast the impeachment hearings in prime time. Hearings begin Wednesday. PBS rebuffed their request:

“If you want to get the whole story of Trumpgate, you need to watch the whole hearing,” he said, noting that many Americans will be at work and at school during the testimony, unable to watch in real time.

“This is a moment in American history where the arc of justice will either be bent forward or it will be bent backward,” he said. “So everyone who wants to see it should have the chance to see the whole story.”

Moyers also noted that “you never know what’s going to happen in the hearings.”

Oh, I think we do if the GOP has anything to say about it. Republicans have added Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) to the House Intelligence Committee where hearings begin. They plan to tailor their performances to an audience of one. The acting president will be watching (Politico):

“Leader [Kevin] McCarthy, ranking member [Devin] Nunes and Jim Jordan are taking preparation efforts to heightened levels with a work-around-the-clock mentality,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), one of Trump’s closest allies on Capitol Hill, told POLITICO.

(Fair warning: Put down your coffee now.)

“Depositions are being reviewed to show the inconsistencies from facts that we know exist,” Meadows added.

Facts?!

“Jim Jordan has been on the front lines in the fight for fairness and truth,” McCarthy said in a statement. “His addition will ensure more accountability and transparency in this sham process.”

(Was I right about the coffee?)

The president wants a spectacle. Republicans plan to stage one.

“You want your best contributors for ‘showtime.’ Driving public opinion is key to many — on both sides of the aisle,” one GOP lawmaker said. “Jordan is definitely a showman.”

Welcome back, my friends
To the show that never ends
We’re so glad you could attend
Come inside! Come inside

By the rules, Jordan will get one five-minute round of questioning “unless other rank-and-file members yield their time to him.” They will.

The New York Times Editorial Board this morning provides a “field guide” to the GOP line of counterattack on “facts that we know exist,” everything from “quid pro no” to “quid pro so?” to, finally, “This is a coup by the Deep State! A decorated American soldier is a Ukrainian agent! The witnesses who have testified are ‘Never Trumpers‘!”

Buckle up.

Come inside, the show’s about to start
Guaranteed to blow your head apart
Rest assured you’ll get your money’s worth
The greatest show in Heaven, Hell, or Earth

Trump’s credo is “Get Even” Of course he’s retaliating against Vindman

Trump’s credo is “Get Even”

by digby

Via TPM:

“Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, who has testified under oath, is serving on the National Security Council currently,” CBS News’s “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan said during her interview with O’Brien. “Will he continue to work for you despite testifying against the President?”

“Well look, one of the things that I’ve talked about is that we’re streamlining the National Security Council,” O’Brien replied. “It got bloated to like 236 people up from 100 in the Bush administration under President Obama.”

The national security adviser said Vindman, who currently serves as the council’s Director for European Affairs, will be removed as a part of the White House’s “streamlining” efforts.

“My understanding is he’s–that Colonel Vindman is detailed from the Department of Defense,” O’Brien said. “So everyone who’s detailed at the NSC, people are going to start going back to their own departments and we’ll bring in new folks.”

When Brennan asked O’Brien to confirm that the decision is not retaliation against Vindman, whom Trump has baselessly accused of being a “Never Trumper,” the national security adviser’s response was that he personally had never retaliated against anyone.

“I never retaliated against anyone,” he said. “There- there will be a point for everybody who’s detailed there—that their time, that their detail will come to an end.
[…]
Trump has attacked him and other witnesses amid the investigation, baselessly claiming that they are “Never Trumpers.” Last week, Trump threatened to release information on Vindman “real soon” that supposedly proves that the colonel is anti-Trump.

Right:

Trump: Some of the people who have been the most loyal to me are the people I didn’t think would be. The people are the most disloyal to me are the people, I think I would have treated them differently. I would have wiped the floor with the guys that weren’t loyal, which I will now do, which is great. I love getting even with people.

Charlie Rose: Hold up. You love getting even with people?

Trump: Oh absolutely. You don’t believe in the eye for an eye? Yeah you do, I know you well enough, I think you do.

Rose: No. … So tell me. You’re going to get even with some people because of …

Trump: If given the opportunity, I will get even with some people who were disloyal to me. I mean, I had a group of people that were disloyal …

Rose: How do you define disloyal?

Trump: They didn’t come to my aid and do small things …

Rose: Did they turn their back on you?

Trump: No, but they didn’t do small things that would have helped … you see, I’m so loyal to people, maybe I’m loyal to a fault. But I’m so loyal that if somebody is slightly disloyal to me I look upon it as a great act of horror.

Vindman’s twin brother also works at the White House handling ethics issues. Let’s see if he’s transferred out as well.

.

Graham signals he’s going full-Kavanaugh for the trial

Graham signals he’s going full-Kavanaugh for the trial

by digby


Via Crooks and Liars:

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) argued that he will consider any impeachment “invalid” unless it exposes the identity of the whistleblower who outed Donald Trump’s extortion of Ukraine.

While speaking to Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Graham suggested that the Senate does not have to fulfill its constitutional obligations to try the Donald Trumpif the House impeachment is deemed “invalid.”

Graham praised Republicans in the House who have called on both the whistleblower and Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President Joe Biden, to testify.

“I consider any impeachment in the House that doesn’t allow us to know who the whistleblower is to be invalid,” the South Carolina senator declared. “Because without the whistleblower complaint, we wouldn’t be talking about any of this.”

“I also see the need for Hunter Biden to be called to adequately defend the president,” he added. “And if you don’t do those two things, it’s a complete joke.”

House Democrats have argued that the whistleblower’s identity does not need to be exposed because the complaint against Trump has been corroborated multiple times by witnesses who have come forward.

The Senate strategy is starting to form, at least as far as Trump and his loyal doormat are concerned. They plan a reprise of this:

It’s not a bad plan. Any thoughts that the Republicans will rebel because this is a sober constitutional process and they need to behave in a dignified and serious manner should be dismissed right now. They practically rioted during a Supreme Court confirmation hearing and it’s considered one of their biggest victories of the Trump era.

They know Trump’s going to beat the rap. They think this vicious, feral, animal act will make it look as though Trump “won” by being strong and having his Palace guards fight off the enemy in hand to hand combat.

It might work. Everything’s a TV show these days and we’ve become inured to Trump shenanigans so a lot of people may think this is just another reality show competition and the Republicans won with their “aggressive tactics” even though it was really pre-ordained because the constitution requires a super-majority to convict, a requirement that would probably save him even if the Democrats held the Senate.

Whether it works or not I think we can depend on these nuts to turn it into a circus. It’s all they’ve got.

.

They love him in Alabama. If they only knew what he really thinks of them.

They love him in Alabama. If they only knew what he really thinks of them.

by digby

This is the Nuremberg rally love he always wanted:

They love him down there in Alabama. Apparently, they are fine with the way he talks about southerners too. Remember what Rob Porter told Bob Woodward he said about Jeff Sessions:

“This guy is mentally retarded. He’s this dumb Southerner. He couldn’t even be a one-person country lawyer down in Alabama.”

There have been other reports of this too:

If Sessions’ recusal was his original sin, Trump has come to resent him for other reasons, griping to aides and lawmakers that the attorney general doesn’t have the Ivy League pedigree the president prefers, that he can’t stand his Southern accent and that Sessions isn’t a capable defender of the president on television — in part because he “talks like he has marbles in his mouth,” the president has told aides.

His loyal minion Laura Ingraham was inspired to issue a warning:

Whatever. They don’t care. He did an exaggerated impression of Sessions at CPAC and they all laughed and laughed. He could shoot someone in broad daylight on the Edmund Pettus Bridge and he wouldn’t lose any Alabama voters.

There are a few dissenters down there who staged a protest at the big game yesterday, but the Trumpers put them in their place:

A man who slashed open a giant “Baby Trump” balloon with a knife during the president’s trip Saturday to Tuscaloosa, Ala., for the Alabama-Louisiana State football game was free on bond Sunday, saying in a video that he’d “do it again if given the opportunity.”

A group protesting President Trump’s visit set up the 20-foot inflatable caricature in a park near Bryant-Denny Stadium ahead of the match between the top-ranked college teams. It was looming among the crowds outside when someone ran up and cut an eight-foot gash in the side, organizers said.

Police identified the suspect as 32-year-old Hoyt Hutchinson of Tuscaloosa. They said officers arrested him after he sliced into the balloon and tried to flee.

Hutchinson was charged with first degree criminal mischief, a felony, and was released on $2,500 bond, according to AL.com. It was not clear if he had retained an attorney. After his release, he posted a Facebook live video, saying as he stood in front of a TV with the game playing: “Some liberals tried to come to my hometown and start some trouble. That ain’t happening. I did get arrested. I got charged. That’s all right. I’d do it again given the opportunity.”

The appearance of the Baby Trump balloon marked the third time in recent weeks that the president has faced conspicuous opposition at sporting events. He was met with sustained boos and chants of “lock him up” when he attended a World Series game at Nationals Park in Washington last month. And he got a similar reception when he attended a mixed martial arts event in New York at the beginning of November. The reactions have incensed some of Trump’s supporters, who call the behavior disrespectful.

While the Baby Trump balloon caused a stir outside the Alabama-LSU game, Trump appeared to get a mostly warm welcome inside the stadium, where he was greeted with a mix of boos, cheers and chants of “USA! USA!”

By the time the game ended, a GoFundMe page titled “Restitutions for Baby Trump Stabber” had been set up by a user named Hoyt Hutchinson. It featured a video of a man resembling Hutchinson’s mug shot yelling “Trump 2020!” as officers push him into an SUV.

A description on the page read: “Hoyt made sure our beloved president didn’t have to see this disrespectful balloon on the streets of Ttown today!!” The paged had raised more than $21,000 as of Sunday morning, far surpassing its goal of $6,000. Hutchinson promised on Facebook to donate whatever is left after his legal expenses “to the Republican Party.”

To be clear, I think puncturing the baby balloon is pretty harmless hijinks. Arresting him is kind of ridiculous. On the other hand, they sicced the FBI on Kathy Griffin for holding up a bloody Trump mask and she was put on the no-fly list so it’s hard to get too worked up about his plight, especially since he’s collecting a nice little bounty for doing it.

Suffice to say that Trump voters in deep-red states just love them some Trump. And I would imagine he’ll stage a big reconciliation with Sessions too. His former AG is groveling at his feet with such mortifying servility that it must make him feel very, very strong.

.

Good girl Nikki! You’re a loyal Trumpster after all.

Good girl Nikki! Now sit up pretty.

by digby

I love how everyone thinks that Nikki Haley is some kind of “independent thinker” because she got out of the Trump administration before she was totally destroyed. No. She’s just another Trump boot-licker — and a backstabber too:

Two of President Trump’s senior advisers undermined and ignored him in what they claimed was an effort to “save the country,” former United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley claims in a new memoir.

Former secretary of state Rex Tillerson and former White House chief of staff John F. Kelly sought to recruit her to work around and subvert Trump, but she refused, Haley writes in a new book, “With All Due Respect,” which also describes Tillerson as “exhausting” and imperious and Kelly as suspicious of her access to Trump.

“Kelly and Tillerson confided in me that when they resisted the president, they weren’t being insubordinate, they were trying to save the country,” Haley wrote.

“It was their decisions, not the president’s, that were in the best interests of America, they said. The president didn’t know what he was doing,” Haley wrote of the views the two men held.

Tillerson also told her that people would die if Trump was unchecked, Haley wrote.

Tillerson did not respond to a request for comment. Kelly declined to comment in detail, but said that if providing the president “with the best and most open, legal and ethical staffing advice from across the [government] so he could make an informed decision is ‘working against Trump,’ then guilty as charged.”

In the book, which was obtained by The Washington Post ahead of its release Tuesday, Haley offers only glancing critiques of her former boss, saying she and others who worked for Trump had an obligation to carry out his wishes since he was the one elected by voters.

The former South Carolina governor, widely viewed by Republicans as a top potential presidential candidate in 2024, has repeatedly sought to minimize differences with Trump while distancing herself from his excesses. Haley, 47, writes that she backed most of the foreign policy decisions by Trump that others tried to block or slow down, including withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate accord and the relocation of the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.

In five years will sucking up to Trump be considered an asset in the GOP? I doubt it. If he loses in 2020, all the bootlickers are going to have to spend years trying to repair the damage to their reputations and it’s going to take a lot longer for the big names who jumped on board. She will not escape. (If he wins in 2024, I don’t think we’ll have much of a country left so it doesn’t matter.)

She didn’t have to write this. She could have avoided the topic and simply left her feelings about the whole thing vague. But no. She demonstrated her loyalty and proved she’s a good little Trumpster after all.

Buh bye, Nikki.

.

A wealth tax will not hurt them

A wealth tax will not hurt them

by digby

The New York Times is featuring a big story today about Warren’ wealth tax. It points out that even if they had it in place since 1982, their fottunes still would have grown faster than average. Not that I think we should care about that. But it’s still instructive:

“As for the 400 people who made it to Forbes magazine’s list of the country’s wealthiest people, each would have an average worth of $3.1 billion, down from the current $7.2 billion.”

That’s right. They would just have fewer billions! This is not a problem for anyone! Not one person. It’s more money than they could ever spend in several lifetimes.

For perspective once again:

We should not even be having this conversation. That is just too much money for these people to have and it’s distorting our system. Even if you believe in capitalism you can’t look at that and say it really makes sense.

Jamie Dimond says they should be “applauded.” I think that’s absurd. They don’t just want to be fabulously wealthy they want to have ALL the money. That’s greed not accomplishment.

.

Rudy’s little circle of grifters and cultists

Rudy’s little circle of grifters and cultists

by digby

Salon has a fascinating scoop this morning about Trump’s cybersecurity czar Rudy Giuliani and his butt dials:

At the end of September, a journalist friend gave me Rudy Giuliani’s phone number. When I called, he picked up on the second ring and promptly divulged previously unreported details about his collaboration with State Department officials on a quid pro quo this summer. Those conversations helped inform a report I filed with BuzzFeed, which was corroborated the next day in testimony and text messages from former Special Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker.

Giuliani forgot my name almost immediately, but we kept in touch. Truth is, I enjoy speaking with him. Two days after publication, on the evening he attended a Yankees playoff game with Alan Dershowitz, Giuliani — President Donald Trump’s 75-year-old informal cybersecurity adviser — accidentally texted me what appeared to be a password: Eight characters, beginning with the name of a networking company and including a capital letter, a special character, and a number. Multiple IT experts confirmed it could be nothing else, and, given the iPhone’s messaging setup, impossible to type with your butt or in any other unwitting way.

After an internal ethical debate, I alerted him. He replied, “Oh, that was just a butt dial,” but thanked me, punctuated with a smiley-face emoji.

Giuliani runs a global cybersecurity firm, but his technological gaffes have become legendary. After texting me the password, an NBC report revealed that around the same time he’d butt-dialed a journalist and accidentally left a voicemail documenting his discussion with an associate about how to get cash. “You know,” Giuliani says at the beginning of the recording, “Charles would have a hard time with a fraud case ’cause he didn’t do any due diligence.”

At the time it was unclear who “Charles” was, but I might have found him. And I found him, through all things, in Giuliani’s attempt to straighten up his media act.

Click over to read it. It’s a tangled web of Trumpers, grifters and marks plotting and scheming for money and Dear Leader.

This country has sunk very, very low. Lower than ever before.

.

A Warning by tristero

A Warning 

by tristero

Democratic Congresscritters are all over the Tube saying things like, “Whoa, when Vindman and Hill and Taylor testify publicly, the American public will finally get to hear live the horrible truth about Trump and his goons.” This is dangerous naiveté.

The closed-door hearings have given the Republicans a tremendous advantage: they know exactly what Vindman is going to say. They know what gets under Hill’s skin and makes her lose her temper. They know Taylor’s weaknesses. In short, they are treating the closed-door hearings as a rehearsal, a dry run, a learning experience, and the Republicans are now fully prepared. It’s about to get ugly.

About to?” you ask, astonished. Yep.

The Republicans are going to take the gloves off and stop pulling punches. There is nothing I would put past Trump and the rest of the GOP, including histrionics on the floor of Congress, mass arrests, pardons, physical threats, and worse.

Meanwhile, the Democrats seem to be wholly unimaginative about the nature of the threat. They appear totally unprepared for the level of disruption that will begin with the public hearings. If past is prologue, there will be utter chaos. And the truths Vindman et al have to say will be given short shrift as the media focuses on the disruption and madness.

UPDATE: Part of the reason I’m so concerned about what will happen next week is because to date, I have seen no one raise alarms about the suspiciously-timed release of what Trump is claiming to be a “transcript” of a second call with Ukraine.

Obviously, this call’s publicly-released summary will be even more heavily doctored in Trump’s favor than the summary of the July 25 call was, and the release spun in Trump’s favor, a la Barr and the Mueller report.  And yet so far, Trump is getting a free pass to publicize the imminent release of the call with no one (at least in the media I check) raising concerns about its potential veracity. In short, those opposed to Trump still don’t fully get how dangerous he is and how nothing he does can, even for a moment, be left undisputed.

The impression I’m getting is that people — Congresspeople, the mainstream press — think that next week will obviously be a slam dunk and Trumpism is in decline. They couldn’t be more wrong. As I see it, they have only begun to fight and now it will start to get uglier than anyone has ever seen before.

All that needs to be said by @BloggersRUs

All that needs to be said
by Tom Sullivan

If you’ve read some of my longer pieces on winning votes in rural areas where Democrats do poorly, Democratic primary candidate for U.S. Senate Jaime Harrison distilled all of that to under two minutes well worth your time.

It’s all that needs to be said about who we are, what we are doing and why. And importantly, whom we have failed and what needs correcting.

If you were not paying close attention, Harrison is running to challenge Sen. Lindsey Graham in South Carolina in 2020.

Senators don’t pave local roads, of course. Local governments do, maybe. The county in Harrison’s story likely has as little money as the man in the shotgun house has political clout. A half-century after I lived nearby, old dirt roads in the upscale South Carolina neighborhood pictured below are still unpaved — by choice. It’s so residents can walk their polo ponies. Hell, it could be the same county.


The late South Carolina Senator Fritz Hollings “discovered” the poverty and hunger in his state after a Charleston nun took him the poorest parts of his own home town. The former segregationist joined the war on hunger and co-authored the 1972 legislation that created the Women, Infants and Children program (WIC).

Harrison’s point is nearly a half-century later the problems Hollings attacked are still there — the same legacy of slavery that left a “black belt” across the South.


Image: The proportional geographic distribution of African Americans in the United States, 2000. The original uploader was Citynoise at English Wikipedia. [CC BY-SA 2.5]

The income gap that existed when Hollings became senator is far worse now than it was then. The man in the shotgun house lives it: What is the point of voting if politics doesn’t improve your life?

Republicans hope to provoke even more white, first-time, non-college male voters to turn out for Donald Trump in 2020, especially in Wisconsin. Trump won’t need them in South Carolina. But if Harrison hopes to turn out Lindsey Graham, he’ll need to offer rural voters like the black man living on that dirt road more of a reason to vote than Harrison is black and a Democrat and Donald Trump is an amoral, racist crook. South Carolina has seen its share.

If J.D. Scholten hopes to turn out Rep. Steve King in Iowa, if Iowa Democrats hope to replace Sen. Joni Ernst, if Democrats’ 2020 presidential candidate hopes to put key swing states into the party’s column, if Democrats from sea to shining sea expect to weaken the GOP’s grip on state legislatures ahead of 2021 redistricting, they need to show rural, urban and suburban voters alike that government is more than a way for connected white people to make even more money. Democrats need to deliver material improvements to people’s lives.

Twitch and shout: “Motherless Brooklyn” (***) by Dennis Hartley @denofcinema5

Saturday Night at the Movies

Twitch and shout: Motherless Brooklyn (***)

By Dennis Hartley

Stanley Kubrick once stated, “I like a slow start, the start that goes under the audience’s skin and involves them so that they can appreciate grace notes and soft tones and don’t have to be pounded over the head with plot points and suspense hooks.” I suspect that Edward Norton, the writer/director/star of Motherless Brooklyn, enthusiastically concurs.

Norton’s film, adapted from Jonathan Lethem’s eponymous 1999 detective novel, qualifies as one such “slow starter”. At 144 minutes, it gives the audience ample time to ponder grace notes and soft tones; and (for the most part) avoids pounding you over the head with plot points and suspense hooks. Movies of that sort are hard to find these days.

I have not read the source novel; but I gather it is a complex murder mystery set in contemporary New York, with a largely internalized narrative from the perspective of its protagonist. Norton shifts the time period to the 1950s and channels most of the complexity into his performance as Lionel Essrog, a private dick afflicted by Tourette Syndrome. Naturally, he awards himself a juicy character role and tackles it with aplomb.

Lionel works as a P.I. for an agency headed by hard-boiled war vet Frank Minna (Bruce Willis). Minna is not only Lionel’s boss, but his best friend and mentor. Minna is one of the few people who doesn’t (whether consciously or unconsciously) stigmatize him for his uncontrollable physical and vocal tics (Lionel’s co-workers call him “Freakshow”). Minna recognizes that certain ancillaries of Lionel’s condition- to wit, a photographic memory and an ability to laser in on minutae are ideal attributes for a private investigator.

One day, Minna asks Lionel and another P.I. from the agency to accompany him for a meet he has with some shadowy individuals. Lionel is instructed to listen in on the conversation from a phone booth while his partner stands by in the car. Minna keeps his cards close to his vest as to what it’s all about but makes it obvious that he has the pair of them tagging along as backup in case the meeting goes south in a hurry. Long story short, the meeting goes south in a hurry, and before the P.I.s can intercede Minna ends up dead.

The mystery is afoot (if it’s a yard). Lionel navigates a crooked maze of avarice and corruption that runs through smoky Harlem jazz clubs, Brooklyn tenement slums and straight to the rotten core of The Big Apple (I think I missed my calling as a pulp writer).

Frankly, the mystery (while absorbing) takes a backseat to the character study and the noir-ish 1950s atmosphere (helped by nice work from cinematographer Dick Pope, whose credits include many Mike Leigh films as well as the 1990 cult favorite Dark City). But Lionel is certainly an interesting study, augmented by a committed performance from Norton, who is one of the finest actors of his generation. As a director, Norton is rock solid if not particularly stylish. Also in the cast: Alec Baldwin (as a very Trumpian New York real estate developer), Bobby Cannavale, Willem Dafoe and Gugu Mbatha-Raw.

It’s tempting to dub this an East Coast Chinatown, but it doesn’t “get under your skin” the same way. Still, Norton deserves credit for going against the grain of conventional modern Hollywood “product”, by making us lean in again and pay attention to the details.

…one more thing
So you’re not up for schlepping to the theater this weekend? Here’s five New York City-based noirs and neo-noirs that are well worth your while and readily available for home viewing:

Dog Day Afternoon (available for rent from Warner Brothers On Demand) – As far as oppressively humid hostage dramas go, this 1975 “true crime” classic from the late Sidney Lumet easily out-sops the competition. The air conditioning may be off, but Al Pacino is definitely “on” in his absolutely brilliant portrayal of John Wojtowicz (“Sonny Wortzik” in the film), whose botched attempt to rob a Brooklyn bank turned into a dangerous hostage crisis and a twisted media circus (the desperate Wojtowicz was trying to finance his lover’s sex-change operation).

Even though he had already done the first two Godfather films, this was the performance that put Pacino on the map. John Cazale is both scary and heartbreaking in his role as Sonny’s dim-witted “muscle”. Keep an eye out for Chris Sarandon’s memorable cameo. Frank Pierson’s tight screenplay was based on articles by P.F. Kluge and Thomas Moore.

Killer’s Kiss (Criterion Collection Blu-ray) – It’s been fashionable over the years for critics and film historians to marginalize Stanley Kubrick’s 1955 noir as a “lesser” or “experimental” work by the director, but I beg to differ. The most common criticism leveled at the film is that it has a weak narrative. On this point, I tend to agree; it’s an original story and screenplay by Kubrick, who was a screenwriting neophyte at the time.

But when you consider other elements that go into “classic” noir, like mood, atmosphere and the expressionistic use of light and shadow, Killer’s Kiss has all that in spades, and is one of the better noirs of the 1950s.

There are two things I find fascinating about this film. First, I marvel at how ‘contemporary’ it looks; it doesn’t feel as dated as most films of the era (or could indicate how forward-thinking Kubrick was in terms of technique). This is due in part to the naturalistic location photography, which serves as an immersive time capsule of New York City’s street life circa 1955 (much the same way that Jules Dassin’s 1948 documentary-style noir, The Naked City preserves the NYC milieu of the late 1940s).

Second, this was a privately financed indie, so Kubrick (who served as director, writer, photographer and editor) was not beholden to any studio expectations. Hence, he was free to play around a bit with film making conventions of the time (several scenes are eerily prescient of future work).

Sweet Smell of Success (available on TCM On Demand) – Tony Curtis gives a knockout performance in this hard-hitting 1957 drama as a smarmy press agent who shamelessly sucks up to Burt Lancaster’s JJ Hunsecker, a powerful NYC entertainment columnist who can launch (or sabotage) show biz careers with a flick of his poison pen (Lancaster’s odious, acid-tongued character was a thinly-disguised take on the reviled, Red-baiting gossip-monger Walter Winchell).

Although it was made over 60 years ago, the film retains its edge and remains one of the most vicious and cynical ruminations on America’s obsession with fame and celebrity. Alexander Mackendrick directed, and the sharp Clifford Odets/Ernest Lehman screenplay veritably drips with venom. James Wong Howe’s cinematography (and use of various New York City locales) is outstanding. Lots of quotable lines; Barry Levinson paid homage in his 1982 film Diner, with a character who is obsessed with the film and drops in and out of scenes, incessantly quoting the dialogue.

The Taking of Pelham, 1-2-3 (available on Hitz and Prime Video) – In Joseph Sargent’s gritty, suspenseful 1974 thriller, Robert Shaw leads a team of bow-tied, mustachioed and bespectacled hijackers who take control of a New York City subway train, seize hostages and demand $1 million in ransom from the city. If the ransom does not arrive in precisely 1 hour, passengers will be executed at the rate of one per minute until the money appears.

As city officials scramble to scare up the loot, a tense cat-and-mouse dialog is established (via 2-way radio) between Shaw’s single-minded sociopath and a typically rumpled and put-upon Walter Matthau as a wry Transit Police lieutenant. Peter Stone’s sharp screenplay (adapted from John Godey’s novel) is rich in characterization; most memorable for being chock full of New York City “attitude” (every character in the film down to the smallest bit part is soaking in it).

Taxi Driver (available on Netflix) – Equal parts film noir, character study and sociopolitical commentary, this was one of the most important (if disturbing) films to emerge from the American film renaissance of the 1970s, due in no small part to the artistic trifecta of directing, writing and acting talents involved (Martin Scorsese, Paul Schrader, and Robert De Niro, respectively).

De Niro plays alienated Vietnam vet Travis Bickle, who takes a night job as a cabbie. Prowling New York City’s meanest streets, Travis kills time between fares fantasizing about methods he might use to eradicate the seedy milieu he observes night after night to jibe with his exacting world view of How Things Should Be. It’s truly unnerving to watch as it becomes more and more clear that Travis is the proverbial ticking time bomb. His eventual homicidal catharsis still has the power to shock and is not for the squeamish.

The outstanding supporting cast includes a then-teenage Jodie Foster (nominated for an Oscar), Harvey Keitel, Peter Boyle, Cybill Shepherd and Albert Brooks. The film’s memorable score is by the late Bernard Hermann (it was one of his final projects).

More reviews at Den of Cinema

On Facebook
On Twitter

— Dennis Hartley