Skip to content

Month: January 2020

“Saying bad things about our country” is not an imminent threat

Trump loves to excitedly dish about what his assassination targets say just before they die to entertain his cult members. He’s undoubtedly lying.

Trump held a VIP GOP fundraiser at Mar-a-lago on Friday night and regaled his donors with exciting details of the strike on Suleimani.

In his speech — held inside the gilded ballroom on his Mar-a-Lago property — he claimed that Soleimani was “saying bad things about our country” before the strike, which led to his decision to authorize his killing.”How much of this shit do we have to listen to?” Trump asked. “How much are we going to listen to?”Trump did not describe an “imminent threat” that led to his decision to kill Soleimani, the justification used by administration officials in the aftermath of the attack.Instead, he described Soleimani as a “noted terrorist” who “was down on our list” and “was supposed to be in his country” before traveling to other nations in the region.

Trump described in detail watching remotely as Soleimani arrived at Baghdad International Airport, where he was met by Iraqi paramilitary leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the head of Kata’ib Hezbollah.Trump claimed erroneously that Soleimani was meeting “the head of Hezbollah” (the Iran-backed Lebanese militant group is separate from group led by Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis).And he claimed the strike he authorized took out “two for the price of one.”He went on to recount listening to military officials as they watched the strike from “cameras that are miles in the sky.””They’re together sir,” Trump recalled the military officials saying. “Sir, they have two minutes and 11 seconds. No emotion. ‘2 minutes and 11 seconds to live, sir. They’re in the car, they’re in an armored vehicle. Sir, they have approximately one minute to live, sir. 30 seconds. 10, 9, 8 …’ “”Then all of a sudden, boom,” he went on. “‘They’re gone, sir. Cutting off.’ “”I said, where is this guy?” Trump continued. “That was the last I heard from him.”

He also talked again about al-Baghdadi screaming and crying before he died, which nobody else has corroborated. And he complained that the dog got more credit than he did. (I guess that explains why he looked at the dog with such disgust when they brought him to the White House.)

Let’s be clear here. Not only have Trump and his accomplices failed to provide any evidence of an imminent threat, but he is also actively trying to provoke more violence from the Iranians. This sort of cheap trash talk is designed to disrespect the memory of these leaders in a way that makes their followers seek retribution. It is counter-productive, to say the least.

But Trump loves to talk about violence in general. He often describes the gory deaths of crime victims in lurid detail and acts out shooting or stabbing when he appears before his ecstatic followers.

I wrote this a while back. To use a Trumpian phrase: he’s a sick cookie.

Trump’s lurid fantasies

At the NRA Convention yesterday:“Right in the middle is like a war zone for horrible stabbing wounds,” he said. “Yes, that’s right,” he went on. “They don’t have guns, they have knives. And it’s said that there’s blood all over the floors at this hospital. They say it’s as bad as a military-war-zone hospital. Knives, knives, knives.”

(This, btw, is just some wet dream of his. Nobody knows wtf he’s talking about.)

CPAC: “are animals, they cut people. They cut ’em. They cut ’em up in little pieces, and they want them to suffer.

In the White House: “They are killing people. Not necessarily with guns because that is not painful enough,” the president opined. “They want to do it more painfully… and slowly. So they cut them up with knives. They don’t use guns, they use knives because they want long, painful death.”

Harrisburg Pennsylvania: “They don’t shoot people because it’s too fast and not painful. They cut them up into little pieces.”

Long Island, New York: “They stomp on their victims. They beat them with clubs, they slash them with machetes, and they stab them with knives. They have transformed peaceful parks and beautiful quiet neighborhoods into bloodstained killing fields. They’re animals.”

There was this one during the campaign:

And this:

“We’re gonna cut you up sir, we’re gonna cut you up…” (Watch from where this starts to 3:30. It’s just pathetic.)

He has a lurid, violent imagination and he’s revealed it repeatedly in public. It’s why he valorizes war criminals and says he loves torture.

Apparently, his followers do too. They cheer when he does it.

We Need to Double Down On Our Criticisms

Image result for to sin by silence

Timothy Egan is clearly a decent person and usually a good op-ed columnist. I need to say this at the start because I’m going to suggest that his latest column could be even more hard-hitting than it already is. He’s not alone in pulling punches so I don’t mean to pick on him. Instead, I hope to point out that this is not a time to equivocate in our rhetoric or merely imply wrongdoing. We should be explicit and blunt, because it is the truth.

Egan organized his Times column today around a quote similar to the one pictured above:

We all grew up hearing an ageless warning about public morality: that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing…

The Trump presidency has shown just how many ostensibly good people will do nothing…

Here’s the two-step that all good people must take now: First, realize the level of depravity that has taken over the White House, and second, fight accordingly.

Agreed, but…

It’s notable that Egan can’t name-check a single elected Republican — not a Representative, not a Senator, not a Governor, no one — who both realizes “the level of depravity that has taken over the White House” and is prepared “to fight accordingly.”

As for Egan’s notion that Trump’s evil is contagious and has subverted otherwise decent Republicans: Who exactly are these “ostensibly good” Republicans that Trump has turned to evil? He doesn’t name them for the very obvious reason that “ostensibly good” elected Republicans do not exist.

The sad truth is that the diminishing cohort of Republicans that aren’t open criminals are just fine with those that are. That includes all elected Republicans including the apparently non-criminal Collins, Romney, Ernst, and so on.

To avoid making this point explict— that there are no decent Republicans left in elected offices — is a mistake. It is not an appropriate response to the current moment (the point of Sargent’s brilliant recent column on the normalizing by the media of Trump rallies). If we are to survive, op-ed columnists, among many others, have to describe the modern-day GOP without a hint of Mueller-like circumspection.

Because it’s not just Nunes, or McConnell/Chao, or Hunter, or Collins. It’s Romney looking the other way. It’s Flake refusing to take a stand against Kavanaugh and preferring to resign rather than speak up. It’s Collins’s Very Serious and Deep Concerned Inaction. It’s all the pathetic sheep on the backbenches avoiding questions or excusing their openly thuggish GOP cronies in the hope that, by not criticizing other party members, they will be able to tap into the lucrative wing nut welfare that awaits them once they are voted out.

When pointing out the obvious awfulness of modern Republicans, it’s a bit of a tradition also to insert a passage that begins, “No one’s claiming the Democrats are perfect.” But I’m not going to. Why?

Only one major political party — the modern Republican party — treats criminal, traitorous behavior as a moral good and highly desirable (because it advances GOP interests). The terrible reality of our time and place is that the GOP has openly embraced corruption, criminality, intolerance, racism, treason, and ostrich-like behavior as core party values. And if you won’t tolerate the criminality, even if you’re otherwise a complete rightwing nut job? Get out of the GOP. The ones that are left are just fine leveraging criminality and treason.

This era in American politics is not accurately described as a case of “we’re all human, therefore imperfect.” All responsible media figures should explicitly state and re-state the unvarnished truth: there are no truly decent and brave elected Republicans. They are not good people who have decided to say nothing. They are, in fact, all very bad people who are perfectly happy saying nothing. They are all complicit in Trump’s grift and betrayal of America.

Can you see what’s wrong with this picture?

It looks like our own National Archives is taking its cue from the Soviets when it comes to censorship.

The large color photograph that greets visitors to a National Archives exhibit celebrating the centennial of women’s suffrage shows a massive crowd filling Pennsylvania Avenue NW for the Women’s March on Jan. 21, 2017, the day after President Trump’s inauguration.

The 49-by-69-inch photograph is a powerful display. Viewed from one perspective, it shows the 2017 march. Viewed from another angle, it shifts to show a 1913 black-and-white image of a women’s suffrage march also on Pennsylvania Avenue. The display links momentous demonstrations for women’s rights more than a century apart on the same stretch of pavement.

But a closer look reveals a different story. The Archives acknowledged in a statement this week that it made multiple alterations to the photo of the 2017 Women’s March showcased at the museum, blurring signs held by marchers that were critical of Trump. Words on signs that referenced women’s anatomy were also blurred.

In the original version of the 2017 photograph, taken by Getty Images photographer Mario Tama, the street is packed with marchers carrying a variety of signs, with the Capitol in the background. In the Archives version, at least four of those signs are altered.

A placard that proclaims “God Hates Trump” has “Trump” blotted out so that it reads “God Hates.” A sign that reads “Trump & GOP — Hands Off Women” has the word Trump blurred out.

Signs with messages that referenced women’s anatomy — which were prevalent at the march — are also digitally altered. One that reads “If my vagina could shoot bullets, it’d be less REGULATED” has “vagina” blurred out. And another that says “This Pussy Grabs Back” has the word “Pussy” erased.

They said that the archivist who was appointed by Obama agreed with the decisions so that makes it ok.

When asked if they had ever done such a thing before in order to avoid “partisanship” they were unable to provide an example.

This creeping authoritarianism is everywhere.

Update:

The struggle never ended (remembered)

Ernest Green, member of the “Little Rock Nine” addresses 38th annual Martin Luther King Jr. Prayer Breakfast, Asheville, NC , January 19, 2019.

The original post extracted below was about the annual Martin Luther King Jr. Prayer Breakfast here last year and the divisions roiling the country that weekend (the Covington kids video from a suspicious Twitter account later suspended):

Those of us of a certain age, but not quite old enough, were too young to attend the 1963 March on Washington. The march and Rev. Martin Luther King’s “I Have A Dream” speech influenced our era, our views, and changed the country. There are times one wishes, if only I could have been there for that moment in history. Then again, such thinking fixes the civil rights movement in time. The truth is, that struggle never ended.

Saturday morning, Ernest Green, one of the “Little Rock Nine” spoke to Asheville’s 38th annual Martin Luther King Jr. Prayer Breakfast. He retold the story of how in 1958 he and several classmates integrated Central High School escorted by 101st Airborne Division troops.

“Over 60 years ago, we arrived in the back of an army wagon at Central High School,” Green said. “I don’t think any of us thought we’d still be talking about high school 60 years later.”

They were just looking for a better education and a chance at upward mobility.

King, who followed the Little Rock effort, was little known at the time. Green said he paid King little mind because, well, King was an adult and he was 16. But King was there when Green graduated, with anti-sniper teams overlooking the football field, helicopters flying overhead, dogs sniffing for bombs, and Green’s classmates not wanting to stand too close to him.

King quoted an old hymn to Green in the car on their way, saying God wouldn’t bring you this far to leave you now.

That struggle against white supremacy never ended.

Heading into campaign season 2020, it is wise to remember how easily passions get ginned up these days. There will be people out there looking to inflame them deliberately, knowing the truth takes time to catch up (if ever) when lies blast off the blocks first. Propaganda efforts aimed at sowing division were effective in 2016. Carefully edited video worked again this time just last year. It pushed just the right buttons. People convinced faithlessness is more common than honor are on high alert for any signs of betrayal. They will find it. Even if imagined or overinflated by social media.

Dan Lavoie, a new York-based political strategist, watched the MAGA kids video blow up his social media feed during the King holiday weekend last year. “I don’t regret being outraged because it was outrageous,” he told the Washington Post. “I do worry about who is outraging us and what they have to get out of it.”

The post-game analysis of the Lincoln Memorial protest altered his original take:

Lavoie had previously written about the regret that he experienced after being influenced by one of the popular Facebook pages that Russia had set up as part of this effort, Blacktivist. That group, too, had played to resentments over racism and the treatment of minorities.

On Monday, he found himself taking to Twitter again.

“We all got played. Myself included,” he wrote of the Catholic-school-kid videos. “It’s important to truly recognize what’s happening to us, over and over.”

Step down to DEFCON 4. But be alert. If you have bullshit detectors, make sure they have fresh batteries.

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

For The Win, 3rd Edition is ready for download. Request a copy of my free countywide election mechanics guide at ForTheWin.us. This is what winning looks like.

A Truly Great Idea

Since the beginning of the Trump era and the dissemination of deliberately fake news, I’ve intentionally avoided satire, and faked videos/photos (no matter how obvious and funny). But this piece of humor/satire by Andy Borowitz is actually a good idea (yeah, I know, I’m spoiling the fun, but I’m deliberately labeling it as a humor/satire so there is no confusion):

NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report)—The former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg upended the 2020 Presidential race on Friday by offering Donald J. Trump ten billion dollars to leave the White House by the end of the day.

“I will deposit ten billion dollars into your account in Moscow, Riyadh, or wherever you do your banking these days,” Bloomberg announced. “All you have to do is go.”

In addition to the ten-billion-dollar offer, Bloomberg told Trump that he would cover the moving expenses of Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Kellyanne Conway, and any other associates “that you haven’t already gotten rid of.”

The sooner Trump leaves office the better. And a bribe might actually work. I certainly hope Bloomberg considers it.

Obama-Hating

The extent to which Trump and his thugs hate All-Things-Obama is simply breathtaking:

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has taken another whack at former first lady Michelle Obama’s signature achievement: Establishing stricter nutritional standards for school breakfasts and lunches. And on her birthday.

On Friday, USDA Deputy Under Secretary Brandon Lipps proposed new rules for the Food and Nutrition Service that would allow schools to cut the amount of vegetables and fruits required at lunch and breakfasts while giving them license to sell more pizza, burgers and fries to students. The agency is responsible for administering nutritional programs that feed nearly 30 million students at 99,000 schools.

Now why on earth would they do this? You won’t believe the reason, but I swear I’m not taking this out of context:

Lipps said the changes will help address what he described as unintended consequences of the regulations put in place during the Obama administration. For example, when schools were trying to implement innovative solutions such as grab-and-go breakfast off a cart or meals in the classroom, they were forced to give kids two bananas to meet minimum federal requirements.

To which the only sane response is: Who gives a shit that kids get two bananas? And if this turns out to be an actual waste of money — say, on the level of Trump’s travel for golf — then fix it, don’t roll back the regulations.

Sheer madness.

Friday Night Soother

When it all gets to be too much — it’s time for sea otters:

Some more from beautiful Morro Bay California, one of my favorite places:

And yes, a pup. Because I need them attimes like this.

And a drink.

Or two.

Have a great holiday week-end everyone!

Next week’s going to be a bitch.

Why Tillerson called him a moron

Oh My God, he’s even dumber and more unstable than we knew. This is bad.

This excerpt from the new book by Leonnig and Rucker called “A Very Stable Genius” is stunning. It had been leaked before that former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had called Trump a “fucking moron” after a meeting at the Pentagon when members of the administration attempted to educate him about — well, everything. We knew that he said he wanted to bring the nuclear arsenal back to the level it was at the cold war but it’s always been a mystery as to what exactly made Tillerson blurt out that comment in a room full of Generals and other high-level members of the administration.

Now we know:

Trump organized his unorthodox worldview under the simplistic banner of “America First,” but Mattis, Tillerson, and Cohn feared his proposals were rash, barely considered, and a danger to America’s superpower standing. They also felt that many of Trump’s impulsive ideas stemmed from his lack of familiarity with U.S. history and, even, where countries were located. To have a useful discussion with him, the trio agreed, they had to create a basic knowledge, a shared language.

So on July 20, 2017, Mattis invited Trump to the Tank for what he, Tillerson, and Cohn had carefully organized as a tailored tutorial. What happened inside the Tank that day crystallized the commander in chief’s berating, derisive and dismissive manner, foreshadowing decisions such as the one earlier this month that brought the United States to the brink of war with Iran. The Tank meeting was a turning point in Trump’s presidency. Rather than getting him to appreciate America’s traditional role and alliances, Trump began to tune out and eventually push away the experts who believed their duty was to protect the country by restraining his more dangerous impulses. […]

What follows is such an amazing story that it makes it even more shocking that Republicans have circled the wagons so tightly around him. They are all traitors as far as I’m concerned:

Just before 10 a.m. on a scorching summer Thursday, Trump arrived at the Pentagon. He stepped out of his motorcade, walked along a corridor with portraits honoring former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs, and stepped inside the Tank. The uniformed officers greeted their commander in chief. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Joseph F. Dunford Jr. sat in the seat of honor midway down the table, because this was his room, and Trump sat at the head of the table facing a projection screen. Mattis and the newly confirmed deputy defense secretary, Patrick Shanahan, sat to the president’s left, with Vice President Pence and Tillerson to his right. Down the table sat the leaders of the military branches, along with Cohn and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon was in the outer ring of chairs with other staff, taking his seat just behind Mattis and directly in Trump’s line of sight.

They had put together a presentation using terms they thought would appeal to the braindead president. It wasn’t good. They wrote things like “the post-war international rules-based order is the greatest gift of the greatest generation” and gave a 20-minute presentation about the alliances that keep the world safe. They greatly misunderstood how he thinks:

…His ricocheting attention span led him to repeatedly interrupt the lesson. He heard an adviser say a word or phrase and then seized on that to interject with his take. For instance, the word “base” prompted him to launch in to say how “crazy” and “stupid” it was to pay for bases in some countries.

Trump’s first complaint was to repeat what he had vented about to his national security adviser months earlier: South Korea should pay for a $10 billion missile defense system that the United States built for it. The system was designed to shoot down any short- and medium-range ballistic missiles from North Korea to protect South Korea and American troops stationed there. But Trump argued that the South Koreans should pay for it, proposing that the administration pull U.S. troops out of the region or bill the South Koreans for their protection.

“We should charge them rent,” Trump said of South Korea. “We should make them pay for our soldiers. We should make money off of everything.”

Trump went into his usual idiotic rap about NATO, saying they were worthless freeloaders because they didn’t “pay their dues.” He yelled at the Generals for letting them get away with it and scolded top officials for the fact that they didn’t collect the money.

It was all money, money, money, that’s all he knows or cares about. He is unable to see the world in any other terms.

“We are owed money you haven’t been collecting!” Trump told them. “You would totally go bankrupt if you had to run your own business.”

He would know. His businesses went bankrupt four times and his daddy bailed him out of every other hare-brained scheme he got into.

Mattis tried to explain that alliances are important to American defense.

“This is what keeps us safe,” Mattis said. Cohn tried to explain to Trump that he needed to see the value of the trade deals. “These are commitments that help keep us safe,” Cohn said.

Trump ignored them and started babbling about how he wanted to tear up the Iran nuclear deal.

“It’s the worst deal in history!” Trump declared.

“Well, actually . . .,” Tillerson interjected

“I don’t want to hear it,” Trump said, cutting off the secretary of state before he could explain some of the benefits of the agreement. “They’re cheating. They’re building. We’re getting out of it. I keep telling you, I keep giving you time, and you keep delaying me. I want out of it.”

Then he jumped to Afghanistan demanding to know why American hadn’t “won” yet.

Trump unleashed his disdain, calling Afghanistan a “loser war.” That phrase hung in the air and disgusted not only the military leaders at the table but also the men and women in uniform sitting along the back wall behind their principals. They all were sworn to obey their commander in chief’s commands, and here he was calling the war they had been fighting a loser war.

“You’re all losers,” Trump said. “You don’t know how to win anymore.”

Then he started in on the war crimes:

Trump questioned why the United States couldn’t get some oil as payment for the troops stationed in the Persian Gulf. “We spent $7 trillion; they’re ripping us off,” Trump boomed. “Where is the f—ing oil?”

Trump mused about removing General John Nicholson, the U.S. commander in charge of troops in Afghanistan. “I don’t think he knows how to win,” the president said, impugning Nicholson, who was not present at the meeting.

“I want to win,” he said. “We don’t win any wars anymore . . . We spend $7 trillion, everybody else got the oil and we’re not winning anymore.”

That’s your isolationist peacenik president expressing his belief that America should be a kinder, gentler nation that doesn’t use the military to achieve its goals.

Trump by now was in one of his rages. He was so angry that he wasn’t taking many breaths. All morning, he had been coarse and cavalier, but the next several things he bellowed went beyond that description. They stunned nearly everyone in the room, and some vowed that they would never repeat them. Indeed, they have not been reported until now.

“I wouldn’t go to war with you people,” Trump told the assembled brass.

Addressing the room, the commander in chief barked, “You’re a bunch of dopes and babies.”

The book describes the scene that followed and it’s really something:

For a president known for verbiage he euphemistically called “locker room talk,” this was the gravest insult he could have delivered to these people, in this sacred space. The flag officers in the room were shocked. Some staff began looking down at their papers, rearranging folders, almost wishing themselves out of the room. A few considered walking out. They tried not to reveal their revulsion on their faces, but questions raced through their minds. “How does the commander in chief say that?” one thought. “What would our worst adversaries think if they knew he said this?”

[…]

Tillerson in particular was stunned by Trump’s diatribe and began visibly seething. For too many minutes, others in the room noticed, he had been staring straight, dumbfounded, at Mattis, who was speechless, his head bowed down toward the table. Tillerson thought to himself, “Gosh darn it, Jim, say something. Why aren’t you saying something?”

Still a good question. This makes me wonder if they really would refuse to follow an unlawful order as everyone assures us they would do.

The more perplexing silence was from Pence, a leader who should have been able to stand up to Trump. Instead, one attendee thought, “He’s sitting there frozen like a statue. Why doesn’t he stop the president?” Another recalled the vice president was “a wax museum guy.” From the start of the meeting, Pence looked as if he wanted to escape and put an end to the president’s torrent. Surely, he disagreed with Trump’s characterization of military leaders as “dopes and babies,” considering his son, Michael, was a Marine first lieutenant then training for his naval aviator wings. But some surmised Pence feared getting crosswise with Trump. “A total deer in the headlights,” recalled a third attendee.

A profile in courage to be sure. But what would anyone expect from him? Anyone who would agree to be Trump’s lapdog is not someone we could expect to ever stand up to him. I hope everyone remembers this when Pence inevitably runs for president.

Others at the table noticed Trump’s stream of venom had taken an emotional toll. So many people in that room had gone to war and risked their lives for their country, and now they were being dressed down by a president who had not. They felt sick to their stomachs. Tillerson told others he thought he saw a woman in the room silently crying. He was furious and decided he couldn’t stand it another minute. His voice broke into Trump’s tirade, this one about trying to make money off U.S. troops.

“No, that’s just wrong,” the secretary of state said. “Mr. President, you’re totally wrong. None of that is true.”

Tillerson’s father and uncle had both been combat veterans, and he was deeply proud of their service.

“The men and women who put on a uniform don’t do it to become soldiers of fortune,” Tillerson said. “That’s not why they put on a uniform and go out and die . . . They do it to protect our freedom.”

There was silence in the Tank. Several military officers in the room were grateful to the secretary of state for defending them when no one else would. The meeting soon ended and Trump walked out, saying goodbye to a group of servicemen lining the corridor as he made his way to his motorcade waiting outside. Mattis, Tillerson, and Cohn were deflated. Standing in the hall with a small cluster of people he trusted, Tillerson finally let down his guard.

“He’s a f—ing moron,” the secretary of state said of the president.

They thought they could educate him that they could make him understand what the job of president actually is. It was impossible. He is a headstrong, spoiled little child, in over his head, but such an egomaniac that he thinks he can bluster through it by simply making decisions on the fly without any consideration of the facts or grasp of the consequences.

“We were starting to get out on the wrong path, and we really needed to have a course correction and needed to educate, to teach, to help him understand the reason and basis for a lot of these things,” said one senior official involved in the planning. “We needed to change how he thinks about this, to course correct. Everybody was on board, 100 percent agreed with that sentiment. [But] they were dismayed and in shock when not only did it not have the intended effect, but he dug in his heels and pushed it even further on the spectrum, further solidifying his views.”

The people in the meeting decided to cover up what they knew. They described his ignorant temper tantrums like this in public:

“He asked a lot of hard questions, and the one thing he does is question some fundamental assumptions that we make as military leaders — and he will come in and question those,” Dunford told Mitchell on July 22. “It’s a pretty energetic and an interactive dialogue.”

These people should have to answer for their cowardice. I know there’s no rulebook for some like Trump but there was no rules book for Hitler or Osama bin Laden either. These leaders are expected to stand up when the country is threatened. And there is no doubt that it was threatened and still is, maybe more than ever.

The whole story is even worse than what I’ve excerpted above. If you can read the Washington Post story or even the book, I urge you to do it. I only wish the Republican establishment cared enough about this to read it as well but they don’t. They care about their own political futures and are afraid that Trump will destroy them with his cult.

And many of them may actually be as mind-blowingly stupid as he is as well and they don’t see what a problem it is to have such an arrogant moron running the world’s only superpower. If there’s one thing right-wingers take as an article of faith it’s that expertise is nothing but a scam and the guy at the end of the bar can run the world better than the pointy-headed elites. They got what they wanted.

We won’t find out if a majority of Americans agree until next fall. I’m not sure if enough of them do, honestly.

Trump and Starr: the odd couple? Not really.

You might think Ken Starr the puritan would be a strange fit with Trump the libertine. Actually, not so much:

This piece by Max Brantley in the Arkansas Times from 2016 shows exactly why:

Kenneth Starr, whose persecutorial past need not be repeated here, gave an extensive interview yesterday with Evan Smith of the Texas Tribune and, boy, was it a corker.

The real victim of the sexual assault scandal at Baylor University while Starr was president was ousted football Coach Art Briles, a molder of young men in Starr’s view. He got a raw deal, Starr said. R

The rape victims? He had little to say about them and avoided use of words like rape and assault. He did haveadvice, as reported by Dead Spin:

Starr reserved his fierce sympathy for Briles and discussed the victims of the sexual assaults only in passing. Much as Briles did in his interview with College GameDay two weeks ago, Starr shied away from any mention of the terms “sexual assault” and “rape,” instead choosing the language of “interpersonal violence” and “unpleasantness.”

This choice of diction, perhaps, made it easier for him to assert that a culture of sexual assault was not endemic at Baylor, particularly as the reported incidents that laid the foundation for Baylor’s scandal occurred off-campus rather than on. Starr offered a convenient solution for any students frustrated by their university’s demonstrated disregard for their humanity:

“My encouragement to students is—don’t go to these off-campus parties. Just don’t go.”

A woman who goes to an off-campus party is just asking for it?

Of course, Starr is most famous for the sexually explicit romance novel he called an impeachment referral against President Bill Clinton. It was written with the intent to both titillate and shock the public with prurient details of a sad, inappropriate consensual affair. He and his accomplices pretended to be appalled by Clinton’s behavior on a deeply personal, moral level.

Then he left and got involved in yet another scandal, this time one about the sexual harassment and assault of young women on the campus he led. He covered it up and was fired for it.

He is a very slimy political operator and always has been. He has no ethics. He is perfect for Trump.

Trump’s dream team

Trump surprised me with this one, I must admit:

Donald Trump is lawyering up for his impeachment trial with a team that looks surprisingly similar to that of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The president bolstered his legal team Friday with attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr, who helped Epstein evade prison time in a now infamously lenient plea deal with Palm Beach prosecutors. Epstein originally faced multiple charges of soliciting and trafficking underage girls, but escaped with just 13 months of house arrest in a deal that caused Trump’s Labor Secretary Alex Acosta to resign under pressure last year.

I think Monica Lewinsky said it best:

Trump also added the wingnut snake Robert Ray, (to whom even the mainstream media has been giving way too much credit during this saga) Pam Bondi and Jane Raskin in addition to his White House counsel Pat Cippolone and his personal lawyer Jay Sekulow. Apparently, they’re going to spend the week-end (!) going through the evidence and preparing for the trial. I’m going to guess that means they don’t plan to present a defense beyond, “Yeah, he did it. He’s our Sun King. Waddya gonna do about it?”

Trump wanted TV lawyers and since he couldn’t get Sam Waterston and Raymond Burr, he picked Fox New defenders. The base will be impressed even if nobody else is and that’s all that matters.

Whether that works on the general population is questionable. Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz carry a whole lot of baggage even beyond what I note above and I suspect the media will make sure people are reminded of it.

Here’s what Trump used to think about Starr:

Bondi is implicated in a bribery scheme with Trump. Robert Ray is a right-wing hack. Only Cippolone is one of Bob Barrs close buddies.

This is all one big show.