Skip to content

Month: January 2020

What the hell ever happened with those taxes anyway?

What the hell ever happened with those taxes anyway?



I don’t honestly know why the media hasn’t been more curious about this but they have done some work on it, such as the blockbuster New York Times series that exposed the Trump family’s years of tax fraud. Unfortunately, the statute of limitations ran out so those particular crimes can’t be prosecuted. But it’s  obvious that the modern Trump “empire” relied on similar scams.

But the point above is the one that still has me gobsmacked. Trump passed one of the biggest tax cuts in history, the bulk of which went to people exactly like himself and his family. And he didn’t divest himself of any of his businesses. In other words he signed a law that almost certainly benefits him and and very few other people and we have no idea just how much money that put into his pockets. 
The House Ways and Means committee has the power to request anyone’s returns and after inexplicable foot dragging by the Democrats the demand for Trump’s is slowly wending its way through the courts.  It’s instructive to recall why that law was passed in the first place. Let’s just say they saw Trump coming a long time ago. I wrote about it a while back.
There were plenty of scandals among the presidencies before Richard Nixon and Watergate, but probably the most serious was the Teapot Dome scandal in 1924. It was a bribery scheme involving government officials taking payoffs to lease oil on public land. One of the ancillary scandals that emerged from that investigation was the suspicion that Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon, who did not divest himself of his vast private holdings, was benefiting from his position. Congress was rightly concerned that the tax legislation Mellon was proposing was designed to benefit his personal interests So it demanded to see Mellon’s tax returns and also determine if the IRS had given him special treatment.


Presidents had long had the right to access any citizen’s tax returns, but as these scandals unfolded, Congress realized that this allowed for a cover-up. This led to the passage of a law that allows the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee and the Joint Committee on Taxation the ability to demand any tax returns from the Treasury Department. The idea was to equally match the power the executive branch had to access this information. There were some slight modifications to the law two years later but other than that it has remained on the books ever since.


The most significant use was during Watergate when the Joint Committee investigated Nixon’s taxes and released them to the public. He had been suspected of substantially underpaying by wrongfully claiming charitable deductions after the law had been changed. The press turned up more suspicious tax evasion schemes as the months went on, with questions over whether he’d paid capital gains taxes on a land deal. Finally, the Providence Journal-Bulletin got hold of Nixon’s returns for 1970 and 1971, which showed he had barely paid any federal taxes at all.


Knowing that Congress was going to evoke the law and obtain the rest of his tax returns, Nixon voluntarily turned them over and asked the Joint Committee to audit them and tell him how much he owed. He ended up paying back $465,000 in 1974. Failure to pay taxes was one of the two articles of impeachment against Nixon that didn’t pass out of committee after nine Democratic members voted against it.


Since the Watergate investigations had revealed the president grossly abusing his power with the IRS, shortly after Nixon’s resignation Congress passed a law that severely limited the president’s access to IRS information and barred him from disclosing it to the public. But it left the 1924 law untouched.


All presidents and major party nominees since Nixon have released their tax returns. That is, until now. President Trump has still not released his, sporadically claiming that he will do it as soon as the IRS is finished “auditing” them. This is, of course, nonsense. Every year would not be under audit and, in any case, there is no law against releasing a tax return that’s being audited. It’s very likely that Trump is lying about this, since he lies about everything.


All presidents should be required to release their returns, but especially one who claims to be vastly wealthy and has refused to divest himself of his private family business. It’s an outrage that he has refused to do it and for any number of reasons, it’s in the public interest that they be released.


Trump’s overseas financial dealings have such clear appearances of conflicts of interest that they could be compromising regardless of whether they actually are. The Moscow Trump Tower deal alone raises alarms that Trump is still secretly involved in business deals in places that put him at risk of being leveraged. The national security threat of a president hiding foreign financial business from the public is obvious.


There are numerous reports of possible money laundering and other nefarious financial dealings with organized crime. He is currently benefiting from the profits of his company despite the constitutional prohibition against the acceptance of foreign emoluments. And the blockbuster New York Times exposé of the Trump family’s decades-long tax evasion scheme downright requires that his current taxes be reviewed. If there has ever been a case where oversight was more necessary, I haven’t heard of it.



If you would like to support this kind of independent media as we cover what is going to one doozy of a political year, you can do so below.


And thank you so much for reading and supporting my work all these years. I am truly grateful. — d

Pompeo the loose-lipped diplomat

Pompeo the loose-lipped diplomat

Pompeo actually made the remark in Texas and it was shown on RT. Nonetheless, it’s more than a little bit disturbing to see the US Secretary of State say such a thing in public.

But consider that he might have just been talking about his wife and himself:

Susan Pompeo, wife of Central Intelligence Agency chief Mike Pompeo, has taken on an unusually active role for a CIA spouse in agency affairs since he started the job in January 2017, regularly spending her days at the agency, traveling with her husband, and attending agency social events — seven sources with knowledge of the matter told CNN…

While Pompeo does not technically have her own office, she frequents the seventh floor director’s suite at CIA’s campus in Langley, Virginia, where CIA employees often “assist Mrs. Pompeo in various ways,” said Trapani. This includes preparing “materials, briefings, meeting agendas and so forth for our programs assisting spouses traveling overseas.” She also works on projects for the Family Advisory Board, as well as providing support services to relocate CIA officers around the world.

Pompeo should not say what he said. But that’s what happens when Republican presidents inevitably try to put wingnut politicians in charge of the CIA. (Remember Porter Goss?)

It is simply not a good idea to pluck some partisan ideologue with no serious experience out of the House and put him in charge of that big, secretive bureaucracy. That Pompeo was taken so seriously simply because he graduated first in a military academy, did a short stint at the CIA and went to Harvard years ago is proof that the GOP bench is very, very thin.

If you would like to support this kind of independent media as we cover what is going to one doozy of a political year, you can do so below.


And thank you so much for reading and supporting my work all these years. I am truly grateful. — d

The Trump Kim bromance on the rocks?

The Trump Kim bromance on the rocks?

There was no contract, although Trump the alleged deal-making genius probably thinks there was. He’s not a details guy…

…the two sides issued only a statement of just over 400 words that touched on four vague issues

  • A pledge to “establish new U.S.-DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.” DPRK are the initials of North Korea’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
  • Joint “efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.”
  • A pledge to work “toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.”
  • The return of the remains of U.S. service members who were killed during the Korean War.

There was also no promise to stop testing in the document — Kim had made his unilateral pledge to stop testing in April 2018, saying at a meeting of the Central Committee of the ruling Workers’ Party of Korea that North Korea had “verified the completion of nuclear weapons” and would end nuclear tests — and only a vague reference to “denuclearization.”

Everyone said at the time that the professionals would get together and fill out the details. Kim was having none of it. He wanted to meet with Trump in person. So they met again in Hanoi but the meeting was cut off prematurely over sanctions relief. And Trump even traveled to Korea and stepped over the demilitarized zone boundary, but nothing came of that either.

Trump’s plan to give himself and Kim Jong Un high profile international fawning press and offer him some good deals on beach condo developments doesn’t seem to to have translated into Kim giving up his nuclear arsenal. Imagine that.

Maybe it succeeded in keeping him from launching an attack but it certainly doesn’t seem to have kept him from continuing development of his missile systems and the sanctions have been largely ignored because everyone assumed that Trump won’t do anything to hurt his bff so they’re pretty much toothless.

The last we heard on the “negotiations” from Pyongyang was:

“As we have got nothing in return, we will no longer gift the U.S. president with something he can brag about,” Kim Kye Gwan, a veteran diplomat, said in a statement carried by North Korean state.

Recall that Trump also strong-armed the Japanese Prime Minister into nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize for his great work with North Korea.

I have no idea what’s going to happen. I am relieved that there has been no nuclear attack, so thanks for that Trumpie. But it appears he’s run out his string. Kim just needed a little more time to get his arsenal online. He doesn’t need him anymore.

Oh, and if you think the resignation/firing of Bolton will help this situation, you are right. That guy is a maniac on North Korea. But it doesn’t look to me as if we exactly have a brain trust in charge today:

If you would like to support this kind of independent media as we cover what is going to one doozy of a political year, you can do so below.


And thank you so much for reading and supporting my work all these years. I am truly grateful. — d

.

All about the dogwhistle

All about the dogwhistle



Stuart Stevens is a highly successful GOP strategist. He’s a Never-Trumper now who has belatedly discovered that his party’s voters never heard any of the blather about conservative ideology he thought he was promoting all those years. That’s probably pretty depressing.
Some of us saw it from the get. I wrote the following in September of 2016:

Nothing left but the dog whistle: “Real America” and the death of the Conservative Movement

That day 15 months ago when Donald Trump descended that escalator to announce his candidacy, it was obvious to me that whether he won, he was going to turn the race into something we had never seen before. He had massive celebrity and a lot of money, and he was tapping into a groundswell of anger over immigration that had shocked the political world just a year earlier when the incumbent House majority leader (Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia) was defeated in a primary largely because of that issue. It was foolish for political insiders to laugh at the possibility that Trump could go all the way. But they did. And they’ve had to play catch-up ever since.

Members of the mainstream Republican establishment were knocked for a loop. They had offered up a dazzling array of GOP all-stars for the public to choose from: former and sitting governors and senators, movement heroes, policy wonks, tough guys, pious religionists, a world renowned neurosurgeon and even a famous high-tech businesswoman. It was beyond their imagination that this crude and inexperienced demagogue could beat any of them, much less all of them.

But as much as political insiders and establishment leaders should have been more savvy about the potential of a populist celebrity billionaire to throw a grenade into a presidential campaign, it was entirely reasonable for many conservative movement leaders to be shocked that a man like Trump could capture the imagination of their movement so quickly and without any serious commitment to their cause.

After all, the last we heard, members of the Tea Party was still running the congressional asylum. Those folks may have a flair for the dramatic, but they’re true believers in the conservative movement, right? There was every reason to believe that the millions of Republican voters who supported them were, too.

What conservatives found out was that all those years of carefully and patiently educating their voters in the nuances of small government, traditional values and strong national defense — to the point where they could elicit ecstatic cheers by merely uttering the words “tort reform” or “eminent domain” — turned out to be for naught. The voters really only heard the dog whistles.

This has been a rude awakening for conservative intellectuals who’ve spent their lives developing their elaborate ideological framework only to find their millions of supposed adherents never really cared about it. Zach Beauchamp at Vox interviewed one such leading intellectual, a professor of political theory at George Washington University named Samuel Goldman, about the state of the movement in the age of Trump. Goldman admitted that the conservative movement is “doomed,” or at least it is no longer viable as a majority, and rightly attributed the problem to the fact that conservatives no longer attract anyone but white people:

The answer has to do with the adoption of a fairly exclusive vision of American nationalism — which sees America not only as a predominantly white country but also as a white Christian country and also as a white Christian provincial country. This is a conception of America that finds its home outside the cities, exurbs and rural areas, in what Sarah Palin called the real America.

If you project yourself as a white Christian provincial party, you’re not going to get very many votes among people who are none of those things. That’s what’s happened over the last 10 or 15 years.

Goldman said this is the result of a demographic delusion in which conservatives believed, despite all evidence to the contrary, that their idealized vision of the real America was literally true.

I’m confused as to why he thinks this trend goes back only 10 or 15 years, however. This idea that “real Americans” are white small-town folks, hardscrabble farmers, blue-collar workers and small-business owners who live somewhere in the heartland has been around a lot longer than that. And it’s been used specifically in politics since the late 1960s, when Richard Nixon first coined the phrase “silent majority” and the political press began to notice its experiences were not necessarily reflective of the nation at large.

I previously cited a piece by Joseph Kraft, a famous newspaper columnist of that era, because it illustrated the point of view that began to pervade the political establishment in the wake of the upheavals of civil rights, the counterculture and the anti-war movement. He wrote it right after the famous 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago:

Most of us in what is called the communications field are not rooted in the great mass of ordinary Americans – in Middle America. And the results show up not merely in occasional episodes such as the Chicago violence but more importantly in the systematic bias toward young people, minority groups, and presidential candidates who appeal to them. 

To get a feel of this bias it is first necessary to understand the antagonism that divides the middle class of this country. On the one hand there are highly educated upper-income whites sure of and brimming with ideas for doing things differently. On the other hand, there is Middle America, the large majority of low-income whites, traditional in their values and on the defensive against innovation. 

The most important organs of media and television are, beyond much doubt, dominated by the outlook of the upper-income whites. 

In these circumstances, it seems to me that those of us in the media need to make a special effort to understand Middle America. Equally it seems wise to exercise a certain caution, a prudent restraint, in pressing a claim for a plenary indulgence to be in all places at all times the agent of the sovereign public.

From there flowed decades of “plenary indulgence” toward this white, provincial real America by both parties, in which politicians were required to pledge fealty to “heartland values” and ensure that such folk were treated with the deference and respect they required.

In other words, this isn’t new. The only thing that’s changed is that the people real Americans resent — African-Americans, women, recent immigrants and LGBT folks — are now assuming positions of prominence and power, and the provincial anger, stoked for so long by the Republican Party, has finally boiled over. Donald Trump is telling those folks what they’ve been wanting to hear, exactly the way they’ve been wanting to hear it for a very long time.

I admit that I didn’t realize there were so many of these people. But it’s been clear for years that the core of the right wing in this country was organized around the idea that they are under siege from blacks, immigrants, feminists, hippies, commies and coastal elites. Trump understood this market far better than he ever got the “luxury” market he tried to brand himself into for all those years.

He says what they’re thinking. And it’s got nothing to do with Locke and Hume and Hayek. It doesn’t even have anything to do with he constitution or the Bible. It’s just the dogwhistles all the way down.

If you would like to support this kind of independent media as we cover what is going to one doozy of a political year, you can do so below.


And thank you so much for reading and supporting my work all these years. I am truly grateful. — d

It’s going to be a tough year but there are some positive signs

It’s going to be a tough year but there are some positive signs



I am entering this year with great trepidation and I’m sure I’m not alone in that. The prospect of the upcoming ugly campaign has me wanting to pull the covers over my head and the perilous lack of rational foreign policy has my anxiety spiking. I feel as if anything could happen.

But mostly, I think I’m just worn out with the day-to-day challenge of dealing with the fact that a monstrous imbecile is president and he’s exposed something horrible about the people I share this country with.

I honestly thought that the type of people who would support the cruelty and hate of someone like Donald Trump could not exceed 20% of the human race. That he maintains 40% approval and may be able to sneak back into office with that minority of intense support fills me with despair. That’s it’s happening while the world is literally on fire is horrifying.

HOWEVER, it’s far too easy to forget that they are loud but there are many more of us than there are of them. And there are cracks appearing in his vaunted coalition. The polls are showing that many white women who once supported Republicans are jumping ship, even the non-college educated. He’s also losing support among some of the white, conservative, evangelicals who form the core of his support.

I don’t know how many may revolt but he cannot afford to lose any votes and expect to run the table through the rust belt again.

So I’m hopeful that he will not be able to pull it off this time. And when I read interviews with people like this woman, a white, pro-life, evangelical Christian, I am reassured that we might be able to at least re-establish a common reality once again.

This is from a series at 538 in which they follow up with some of their commenters:

This week we talked with Jennifer, a 38 year old white woman from North Carolina who wrote in to say, “I am an evangelical Christian but I think Trumpism is actually, truly a religious cult.” She feels “horrified to watch most of my friends and family believe Trump is God’s chosen one … I feel like I’m living inside of the story “The Emperor Has No Clothes.” Am I the crazy one?! Why can no one in church see he’s naked!!!!!”

Clare Malone: When did you come to this opinion and how?

Jennifer: It was leading up to the 2016 election. And it really was hearing the sound bites of the actual words coming out of Donald Trump. Now, it wasn’t certain talking heads or certain news programs. It was literally the quotes or the video clips of him speaking that were so offensive to me. I couldn’t imagine voting for him even though I’ve always been a Republican. I would probably consider myself a little bit of a centrist at this point. I mean, I’m pro-life — like, babies being born but also refugee children being cared for. I think it’s hypocritical to be here for one and not the other. And I care about women in crisis too, I just don’t think that these issues need to be so dehumanizing for certain people to win power.

She goes on to describe the weird feeling she has when she is among people who can’t or won’t see the obvious about him. That’s one thing we have in common.

Basically she thinks it’s about justifying their vote and staying consistent among those who might have underlying discomfort with what he’s turned out to be. I hope she’s right because people like that can retreat from the worst of Trumpism once he’s gone. It’s the ones who really truly love him that have me worried.

Republicans should be worried about this:

The funny thing is, I felt like I wasn’t that political of a person before 2016. But then I just felt so deeply offended by the attitudes towards women, towards minorities, the horrible things happening at the border. And I mean, to be honest, I just expect more of Christians. Because I am a Christian.

This is a non-college educated, white, Christian woman who had her consciousness raised. I suspect there are a few who voted for him in 2016, or didn’t vote at all, and didn’t see how bad it would be. They know now.

Let’s hope there are enough of them in those swing states who will come out and vote next November and send this barbarian back to Mar-a-lago permanently.

If you would like to support this kind of independent media as we cover what is going to one doozy of a political year, you can do so below.


And thank you so much for reading and supporting my work all these years. I am truly grateful. — d

Existential hope by @BloggersRUs

Existential hope
by Tom Sullivan


Summer Sunrise over the Mojave, shot at 6:26am on 23, August 2017. Photo by Jessie Eastland (CC BY-SA 4.0).

The existential dread Ed Kilgore feels is understandable. The dawn of 2020 brings with it the possibility of a second term for Donald Trump term:

Three years into his reign, it’s harder than ever to accept that so many wage earners lionize this billionaire surrounded by billionaires who has never sided with working people in any conflict with the malefactors of great wealth, or to accept that so many law-abiding people celebrate his lawlessness, or to accept that millions of Bible-believing Christians look at this heathenish bully who exemplifies every vice and form of idol worship the Good Book warns them about and see a redeemer.

Kilgore was born and raised in the South where Trumpism is “intensely” popular. He understands but cannot accept the resentments of Trump fans. A minority of Southerners still carry chips on their shoulders left over from the War of Northern Aggression. Plus, an inferiority complex they compensate for with the kind of chest-thumping bluster the president displays every day. Trump may not get them, but they get him. A lot of other Americans who, rightly or wrongly, feel put down by life do as well.

Part of that comes from being raised in more homogeneous communities where outsiders stick out (or were relegated to the wrong side of the tracks). The human scenery in such places is changing in ways that seem threatening. Political and economic power is shifting. Those accustomed to being in control don’t like it.

People raised in larger cities get early exposure to a broader mix of languages, lifestyles, and cultures. A playwright friend raised in the Bronx described it as a vibrant mix of cultures, languages, foods and religions. By the time he was nine, he’d been in all of his friends’ homes, slept over maybe, and eaten their mothers’ food. The religious iconography on the walls may have been different from his home, but that didn’t make them a threat. They were just his friends’ parents.

That willingness to accept peoples’ differences sustains hope that this nation of immigrants isn’t done accepting. The “Trumpian experiment in populist white nationalism” simply has exposed another of America’s dark, family secrets. Ask around the South or read Faulkner. There’s nothing new about those.

How we respond in 2020 will determine whether Trumpism is an aberration or a new normal. I have hope it is the former and plan to work to make sure of it.

As people reviewed the decade last night, this 2017 snapshot from New York City appeared in my social media feed. May it light your way in 2020.

Donald Trump had been in the Oval Office for two weeks:

I got on the subway in Manhattan tonight and found a Swastika on every advertisement and every window. The train was silent as everyone stared at each other, uncomfortable and unsure what to do.

One guy got up and said, “Hand sanitizer gets rid of Sharpie. We need alcohol.” He found some tissues and got to work.

I’ve never seen so many people simultaneously reach into their bags and pockets looking for tissues and Purel. Within about two minutes, all the Nazi symbolism was gone.

Nazi symbolism. On a public train. In New York City. In 2017.

“I guess this is Trump’s America,” said one passenger. No sir, it’s not. Not tonight and not ever. Not as long as stubborn New Yorkers have anything to say about it.

May all our 2020s look like that.

We are still running the Happy Hollandaise end-of-year fundraiser. If you would like to support this kind of independent media as we cover what is going to one doozy of a political year, you can do so below.


And thank you so much for reading and supporting my work all these years. I am truly grateful. — d