Skip to content

Month: May 2020

The death cult at the grocery store

I am reliably told by lefty populist types that I need to be empathetic toward people like this because they are hurting in this pandemic and we will need to understand why they are behaving this way if we want to get through this.

I do understand why they are doing this and I can’t for the life of me figure out why I’m supposed to be empathetic toward them for it. They are behaving like spoiled children who care about nothing but themselves.

Many of them are making a ridiculous political point to show their fealty to this monster in the White House. And they are putting other people, including their own families, at risk:

The exchange was tense between the customer and Jesse, a Trader Joe’s employee sporting a white face mask and a flowery Hawaiian shirt.

“Why aren’t you wearing the mask?” Jesse asked the customer on a recent day at a store in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif. “I am not here to question what you believe in. These are the rules. I am just asking you kindly to wear the mask.”

The customer, Genevieve Powers, who was recording the entire exchange, refused. “We are in America here,” she said, “Land of the free.” Then she turned her camera on other shoppers, who were less than amused: “Look at all of these sheep that are here, all wearing this mask that is actually dangerous for them.”

Jesse, identified only by his first name in the video, telephoned the police, who did not arrive. Finally, when Ms. Powers left the store, others customers burst into applause.

As more parts of the country reopen businesses, many retail workers have reluctantly turned into de facto enforcers of public health guidelines, confronting customers who refuse to wear masks or to maintain a wide distance from others. The risk of a violent reaction now hangs over jobs already fraught with health perils.

A Target employee in Van Nuys, Calif., ended up with a broken left arm after helping to remove two customers who refused to wear masks. A cashier told a man refusing to wear a mask that he could not buy a pack of cigars at a convenience store in Perkasie, Pa. He punched her three times in the face. In San Antonio, a man who was told he could not board a public bus without a mask shot a passenger, the police said. The victim was hospitalized and the gunman was arrested. And in a confrontation that turned deadly, the security guard at a Family Dollar store in Flint, Mich., was shot and killed after insisting that a customer put on a mask.

Meegan Holland, the spokeswoman for the Michigan Retailers Association, said stores were caught in the middle. “People can get belligerent when being asked to do something that they do not want to do,” she said.

Masks have been recommended by public health officials as a key way to diminish the spread of the coronavirus, with at least a dozen states requiring them and many others issuing a hodgepodge of county or municipal orders. They have also turned into a flash point in the country’s culture wars, with some defending their right to not wear one.

“We have individual rights, we don’t have community rights,” said Ms. Powers, 56, the customer at the Trader Joe’s store, in an interview this week.

Public health experts said this argument was misguided. “I never had a right to do something that could injure the health of my neighbors,” said Wendy E. Parmet, the director of the Center for Health Policy and Law at Northeastern University.

Mask opponents generally overlook the fact that such regulations are meant to protect other people, not the person wearing the mask, she added. Americans are navigating a patchwork of conflicting national and local guidance on masks. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for example, initially downplayed the efficacy of masks but now recommends them.

And they have become a ready symbol for those dubious about giving government officials wide powers for an extended period.

Retailers find the confrontations over masks a minefield. “It is a very hot button issue,” said Kenya Friend-Daniel, a spokeswoman for Trader Joe’s. The company declined to allow Jesse, the employee involved in the confrontation, to be interviewed.

“We do not want to put our crew members in the position to have to enforce something like that,” she said, noting that customers “overwhelmingly” wear masks.

[…]Smaller retailers feel especially vulnerable to balancing the need for safety and the need to revive their bottom line.

In Charleston, S.C., at M. Dumas & Sons, a 103-year-old men’s clothing store, employees wear masks in line with a city requirement while customers are offered them at the front door. Gary Flynn, the owner, estimated that 50 percent of his customers would walk away if required to wear a mask.

“I want whatever I can get right now,” he said, with business inching up but still only 25 percent of what it was a year ago. He acknowledged that his workers were putting themselves in harm’s way to generate sales. “So it’s a slippery slope and it’s a moral challenge every day to try to figure out what’s the right thing to do,” he said.

Farther up King Street, Las Olas Swimwear boutique was doing brisk business in bathing suits for beach-starved customers, as well as face masks. The store has sold more than 500 masks produced by a New York swimwear supplier. Daniel James, the owner, stated unequivocally that he would fire any employee not wearing a face mask, but said masks were voluntary for customers.

In Michigan, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer made masks mandatory in late April and allowed stores to bar customers who refused. But she did not criminalize such refusals, so police have only intervened when confrontations turned violent.

In Illinois, Rob Karr, the president of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, compiled a list of episodes that took place in the first 48 hours after masks became mandatory on May 1. One customer threatened to get a gun from his car to shoot the worker insisting that he wear a mask. Several employees were hit, while others were verbally abused. Sometimes customers fought each other. The list has only grown longer.

Some police departments refused to respond when stores asked for help, Mr. Karr said, while various retailers were fined $750 for not enforcing the ban.

In Warwick, R.I., a police union initially announced on its Facebook page that it would not enforce Gov. Gina Raimondo’s mandatory mask order, calling it “overreaching” and bound to destroy the bridge of trust built with the community. The police chief then issued a statement saying the department would act.

Lawrence O. Gostin, the Georgetown University professor who wrote the draft public health law adopted by many states, suggested that in the absence of national guidelines, retailers should develop one policy for all their stores and stick with it, whether it has the backing of state law or not — that way the rules would be clear for all customers.

Some experts also suggested it was overkill to involve police in the general enforcement of public health measures. The issue should be treated like wearing seatbelts or not smoking in public, which eventually became habits, Ms. Parmet suggested, but such consensus must develop much more quickly given the danger from Covid-19.

I don’t think you can have police enforcing this. It’s too fraught with politics at this point.

But damn. Some of our fellow Americans sure are hardcore assholes. It’s not like tying a bandana around your face is asking too much of anyone. Turning that simple act of social solidarity into a culture war symbol and sign of their mewling fealty to Donald Trump says everything about what’s wrong with the right-wing.

They aren’t even trying to hide it

The Washington Post reported on the “Obamaghazi” pseudo-scandal last night if you want to take a deep dive into this nonsense.

But this is the real story which doesn’t appear until the very end:

Last Thursday, when Grenell showed up at the Justice Department to deliver the list to Barr, the visit and Fox News’s apparent knowledge of it took some senior officials there aback. Grenell, who had been ambassador to Germany before assuming the intelligence post on a temporary basis, has long associated with some of Trump’s most vocal right-wing supporters and has earned plaudits from the president for his tweets attacking journalists.

Shortly after the visit, according to Justice Department officials, Grenell’s office seemed to be intimating to reporters that it would be up to Barr or his underlings to decide whether to release the document.

That, in the view of Justice Department leadership, was not accurate, since the department did not create the document and Grenell, not Barr, had declassified it.

“The information is not ours to release,” Justice Department spokesman Kerri Kupec said Tuesday on Fox News. She explained that Grenell’s office “owns that document. They declassified that document. So if they choose to put that out there, they’re more than welcome to do so.”

Ultimately, Republican Sens. Charles E. Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin asked for the list and then released it on Wednesday.

Trump and his allies were prepared to pounce.

“Almost all of us who are involved or follow this have the facts of this case memorized,” Rudolph W. Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, said during the Russia investigation. “So it’s natural to want to talk about the requests to unmask Flynn and really look at whether these people were engaged in a conspiracy to get Flynn out.”

Conservative media in turn have been abuzz this week with anger about Flynn’s treatment and criticism of U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, who is overseeing the Flynn case and must approve the dismissal of the charges. Sullivan has appointed a retired federal judge to oppose the Justice Department’s position and explore whether Flynn should be held in contempt for lying to the court.

“The hatred for Donald J. Trump is as strong and intense as ever, and it is flavoring and directing and influencing what everybody in that town is saying and doing about virtually everything they’re saying and doing,” conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh told his listeners this week.

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett, whose books about the Russia probe have been touted by Trump, theorized Thursday on “Fox & Friends” that the Obama administration went after Flynn “with a vengeance” because he had been determined to “expose the Russia hoax.”

Two people involved in Trump’s reelection campaign said the effort was designed not only to weaken Biden, but also to tarnish Obama, who is likely to be a visible surrogate for Biden this fall. Obama had the highest approval rating, at 60 percent, of all living political figures tested in a recent Republican National Committee poll of voters in 17 battleground states. Biden and Pence tied for second at 47 percent.

Revealing the ways Trump hopes to benefit politically from the issue, Trump sent a fundraising plea to supporters on Thursday declaring, “Oh how the tables have turned.” After an investigation he dubbed “the Russian Collusion Delusion,” Trump wrote, the unmasking list shows “Sleepy Joe is the GUILTY one.”

That is the real story. It’s nothing more than a re-election strategy. I wrote about this for Salon earlier. And I suspect it may backfire spectacularly. Many of the seniors he’s consigning to death or endless imprisonment with his cavalier dismissal of the pandemic aren’t going to find this to be a compelling message. And if anyone was thinking that the African American vote might stay below 2008 levels this is one way to energize them. And frankly a lot of other members of the Democratic base are going to be offended by this. Obama is the most popular Democratic politician in America.

But sure, go ahead and bring him into the campaign.

Michelle Goldberg has an excellent column in today’s NY Times on this subject. She runs down the Obamaghazi plotline and contrasts it with the very real, deadly, scandal that was laid out by Dr. Richard Bright yesterday.

She concludes:

Since Trump took office, he has, like many authoritarians, built an alternative reality that deranges public discourse and encases his followers in a carapace of lies. As the evidence of his savage incompetence becomes harder to deny, the efforts to shore up that alternative reality will only become more desperate. The real scandal of a looted government leaving citizens prey to death and destitution will fuel ever more histrionic fake ones. It remains to be seen whether howls about Obamagate can distract from the desolation Bright warned of in January, and is warning of still.

Maybe we’ll get lucky. I hope so. But I wouldn’t bet on it. This is one case where the Bizarro World alternate reality is downright lethal.

Trump the “wartime” president

My Satirical Side: Trump Wants Uniform to Go with Military Parade

A few weeks ago, in one of his many branding brainstorms during this COVID-19 crisis, President Trump started calling himself a “wartime” president who was valiantly leading the country in the battle against “the invisible enemy.” This was rolled out like a campaign slogan, indicating that it was part of a planned strategy to put Trump at the center of the response to the pandemic.

In remarks obviously prepared by someone else, he evoked World War II and said:

Every generation of Americans has been called to make shared sacrifices for the good of the nation. … Now it’s our time. We must sacrifice together, because we are all in this together, and we will come through together. It’s the invisible enemy. That’s always the toughest enemy, the invisible enemy.

Not bad. This was in mid-March, during the period when he was appearing at the task force briefings and pretending to be in charge, before he realized that everything had gone awry and that he was being blamed for the failures. In fact, it was just a day later that he started passing the buck to the governors for failing to save their states, explaining that the federal government is simply “back-up” and not a “shipping clerk.”

In the end, Trump didn’t have anything close to the ability to take charge of the response and do what any other national leader would have done in the circumstances. So the nation’s pandemic response has remained chaotic and unfocused and now the states are simply operating on their own.

But that doesn’t mean that Trump is not a wartime president. He is. It’s just that he’s not bringing the country together to fight “the invisible enemy.” He’s dividing the country to fight the culture war. It’s the only battle Trump knows how to fight, and he clearly believes it’s necessary for him to win re-election, which is the only issue he really cares about.

The coronavirus is just another weapon to use against his political enemies. He’s been single-mindedly encouraging the governors to ignore the guidelines put out by his own administration and “open up” without regard to any concerns about spreading the virus.

Bars were bustling anyway as some Wisconsin residents, without wearing masks or social distancing, rushed out to start drinking the minute the ruling came down. With the help of right-wing media, he is attempting to turn the pandemic into a just another culture war clash.

Here’s an example of how that’s playing out in the Long Island suburbs of New York:

This Bloomberg headline isn’t something you’d normally expect to see in America but Trump thinks it’s great: “Michigan Cancels Legislative Session to Avoid Armed Protesters.”

The jury is still out on whether this represents more than a small number of Republicans. Polling suggests that the vast majority of Americans, including significant proportions of the Trump base, such as senior citizens, aren’t signing up. The problem, of course, is that it only takes a few irresponsible folks to spread this highly contagious virus to a whole bunch of others who didn’t enlist in this particular battle.

Trump isn’t relying on this coronavirus backlash alone. He’s opened up a second front in his war. The “Obamagate” frenzy that broke out this week on the news of Attorney General Bill Barr’s latest move to nullify the Mueller investigation has the right wing in a state of mass hysteria, with Trump leading the charge. They’re gearing up for hearings in the Senate in June and the highly anticipated conclusion of special counsel John Durham’s investigation appears to be timed to coincide with it.

Trump is telling the troops that Barack Obama himself — and of course Joe Biden, his apparent November opponent — may go to prison for their nefarious crimes (none of which he is able to articulate in detail.) He knows his people. There is nothing they would love more than to have Michael Flynn lead a “Lock them up!” chant at the virus vector also known as the Republican National Convention, which the party still plans on holding in person this summer.

Trump apparently figures that pretending the pandemic is over and taking up some good old-fashioned Obama bashing is his ticket to re-election. He should probably think twice. He might be able to energize his base, but attacking the most popular Democrat in the country will also set the Democratic base on fire. Paternalistically telling seniors that he loves them isn’t likely to make them feel better about dropping the ball on a crisis that may kill them in large numbers. And as Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said, in uncharacteristically defying Trump’s wishes to call Obama before the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Be careful what you wish for.”

Perhaps even more alarming than Trump’s depraved re-election campaign is the war he is more broadly waging against “Blue America.” Trump has never seen himself as the president of any citizen or state that didn’t vote for him, and is continuing to use whatever tools he has at his disposal to further divide the country.

The Atlantic’s Ron Brownstein has analyzed the president’s recent behavior during the crisis and finds numerous instances of the administration and Trump himself institutionalizing this notion — with Republican officials backing his move.

Even aside from the empty threats to throw Barack Obama in jail, Bill Barr’s moves to turn the Department of Justice into a tool for presidential retribution against Trump’s political enemies, and the ongoing purge of anyone Trump believes has failed to show loyalty, throughout the COVID-19 crisis Trump has made clear that Democratic governors need to grovel before him if they expect any federal aid. He did the same thing, of course, with Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria and California in the wake of the devastating wildfires of the last two years.

Trump suggested that governors of various states would have to “negotiate” with him and agree to give up sanctuary cities in exchange for federal aid. He and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell even cooked up a plan to deny pandemic aid to liberal-leaning states, literally calling it “No Blue State Bailouts.” Republican governors are now following his lead and doing the same with the Democratic mayors of major cities. After years and years of bellowing about “local control,” they are now overruling mayors’ stay-at-home orders in an effort to force people back to work.

As Brownstein writes, “From the office that symbolizes national unity, Trump is pursuing a form of secession from common purpose.” Rather than doing the one thing that might have assured his re-election — guiding an effective national response and bringing the country together to confront the gravest health crisis in a century and the worst economic upheaval since the Great Depression — Trump is consciously tearing the country apart to satisfy his ego and give his followers the red meat they crave.

Americans are worried about losing their jobs, their businesses, their homes, their loved ones. They are worried about dying. Donald Trump thinks he can keep playing his greatest hits and voters will rise up and reward him. He wants to do what he loves, which is campaign and campaign dirty. That’s the only part of the job he knows how to do.

My Salon column reprinted with permission

The dumbest thing he said this week

My God:

Both of those statement are simply … insane.

But he didn’t stop there:

I don’t know how many people will hear these comments but they are among the dumbest things he’s ever said. And boy is that saying something. He seems to truly believe that if they didn’t test we wouldn’t have the problem. (Or that the testing is what causes people to catch the virus?)

We know he also thinks the death toll is a big lie so basically, his position seems to be that the virus is not really that bad and the only reason it looks bad is that his enemies are lying about the death toll and all the testing is making it seem like there’s more disease than there actually is. Or something. It truly makes no sense.

Meanwhile:

A majority of Americans disagree with Trump on testing. They say he’s not doing enough and we need more tests.

  • 73% of Americans believe there are not enough tests available in the United States.
  • 57% of Americans say the federal government is not doing enough to address the limited availability of testing.
  • 61% of Americans say it’s the federal government’s responsibility to make sure there are enough coronavirus tests to safely reopen.
  • 62% of Americans say they don’t trust Trump for coronavirus info.
  • 57% of Americans say Trump has done a bad job handling the coronavirus outbreak. 

I’m just shocked that so many still approve. Of course, they seem to be the sorts of people who rush out to a crowded bar to get drunk the minute their right-wing court takes the power away from elected officials to protect the public.

Baby swab, swab, swab….

Those testing swabs you’ve heard so much about? For the COVID-19 test Donald Trump swears on grandfather Friedrich’s brothel anyone who wants one can get? Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker told the CBS show “Face the Nation” on May 3 that his office had arranged for the Trump administration to ship the state 600,000:

“Much of what came out of the White House for many weeks was not helpful,” Pritzker said. “We needed the White House to lead on the Defense Production Act to help us get swabs, to help us get VTM [vital transport medium], to help us get reagents. That really hasn’t much happened.”

But at least the swabs were on the way.

WTTW News in Chicago reported Thursday night, however, there has been a slight mix-up:

Some arrived without issue: A shipment of 5,000 came on May 4, then another 39,600 arrived a week later, on Monday.

But this week, Illinois got what appeared to be – at first glance — some 23,000 cotton baby swabs.

Packages marked “Comforts for Baby: Cotton Swabs” arrived in a cardboard shipping box; 180-count packs that look the same as what Illinois received are selling for $1.50 on Instacart

“What are we supposed to do with these?” a spokeswoman with the Pritzker administration said. “Not helpful.”

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) swears on its public-safety mandate the confusion lies only in the packaging. The swabs are, in fact, not cotton as labeled but the polyester material required for upper respiratory sampling. To expedite delivery, the supplier simply used existing packaging for the test-grade supplies. A letter from the manufacturer swears on its stockholders’ letterhead the supplies it sent are good for swabbing uncomfortably deep into a patient’s sinuses. Yet, what was delivered are the length of a Q-tip and not individually packaged.

Washington, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania received similarly packaged swabs, CNN reports this morning:

The FDA said it had worked with US Cotton to design the swabs, which are shorter than the swabs used by technicians, doctors or nurses to collect samples to test people for Covid-19 infection.

CNN reported on the shorter swabs in April:

“The type of testing at the front of the nose used in this study is notable because it allows self-collection by patients thereby limiting exposure of healthcare providers; it is more comfortable for patients and it can be performed by a swab that is more readily available and manufacturable at scale,” the FDA said in a statement.

The shorter swabs are designed for at-home testing, but it is not clear that is the type swab these states requested. CNN added for clarity, “Commercially available cosmetic Q-tips are not suitable for use in testing because their cotton fibers absorb too much snot.”

Jordan Abudayyeh of the Illinois governor’s office called the mislabeled shipment another Trump administration effort to “check a box and say we sent them.”

“It’s helpful for (the Trump administration) to say, ‘We sent swabs.’ But it’s more helpful if you say, ‘We sent you swabs where you can actually use and deploy right now without having to take additional steps between now and then,'” she said.

In March, Illinois was expecting a shipment of 300,000 N95 respirator face masks from the Trump administration. Basic surgical masks arrived instead.

Sorry about the “Baby Shark” reference. I swear on my great granduncle’s schooner I shipped a different headline.

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

For The Win, 3rd Edition is ready for download. Request a copy of my free countywide GOTV mechanics guide at ForTheWin.us. This is what winning looks like.
Note: The pandemic will upend standard field tactics in 2020. If enough promising “improvisations” come my way by June, perhaps I can issue a COVID-19 supplement.

Obama to testify? Bring it on.

Trump wants Lindsey Graham to bring President Obama up to the Senate to testify about Obamaghazi:

If President Donald Trump’s Twitter feed is an indication of where his head is at, his thoughts on Thursday morning were far from the 84,000 Americans that have died from COVID-19.

The president’s morning obsessions included Barack Obama, a government whistleblower, his 22-0 record on congressional endorsements, and unspecified “good numbers” coming out of states that have begun to wind back pandemic-related shutdowns.

In a tweet tagging Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, Trump called for former President Obama to be brought before Congress to testify about unspecified crimes that Trump thinks constitutes the biggest scandal in history.

“If I were a Senator or Congressman, the first person I would call to testify about the biggest political crime and scandal in the history of the USA, by FAR, is former President Obama,” he wrote. “He knew EVERYTHING. Do it @LindseyGrahamSC, just do it. No more Mr. Nice Guy. No more talk!”

Trump has been loudly complaining about “OBAMAGATE!” in recent days, first amplifying the allegations in a stream of 120 tweets and retweets on May 10. But he has conveniently declined to say what crimes Obama is supposed to have committed.

Asked by a Washington Post journalist this week, Trump responded: “Obamagate. It’s been going on for a long time. It’s been going on from before I even got elected. And it’s a disgrace that it happened.”

When pressed to say what offense was committed, Trump said: “You know what the crime is. The crime is very obvious to everybody. All you have to do is read the newspapers, except yours.”

Trump and his allies have long claimed, without evidence, that the investigation into Russian election meddling, started by the FBI in 2017, was a hit job by the outgoing Obama administration.

Since the Department of Justice sensationally moved to drop its case against Trump’s one-time National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his contact with Russian officials, Trump’s “Obamagate” conspiracy theories have reached fever pitch.

Richard Grenell, Trump’s acting director of national intelligence, released a declassified list on Tuesday of Obama administration officials who sought to “unmask” Flynn—a fairly common practice by senior officials who want to know the names of people under government surveillance. (Under privacy laws and intelligence regulations, the names of Americans picked up on foreign wire taps are concealed unless officials ask that they be unmasked.)

Trump and his supporters claimed the list shared by Grenell, which included Trump’s likely 2020 opponent Joe Biden, was more proof that the Obama administration sought to sabotage the incoming Trump administration.

Graham, whose panel is investigating the origins of the Russia probe, is unlikely to take up Trump’s call to bring Obama before Congress.

“I don’t think now’s the time for me to do that. I don’t know if that’s even possible,” he told Politico on Thursday, reiterating his comments from earlier in the week that he was not anticipating calling Obama. “I understand President Trump’s frustration, but be careful what you wish for,” he added.

Graham understands that Barack Obama is very popular and very smart. If they want to energize the Democratic base this is the very best way to do it.

But Trump is pressing Graham for a reason. He’s running for re-election and it depends upon him licking Trump’s boots as fervently as humanly possible. Graham will have to throw him some kind of a bone. Lord only know what it will be.

Fruits to the volcano

Things we knew but are always grateful for move evidence to support it:

President Trump was wary of making preparations for the coronavirus pandemic because he was concerned doing so would sent the stock market into a panic, the Financial Times reports. In a quote attributed to an unnamed Trump confidant who is said to speak to the president frequently, it’s claimed: “Jared [Kushner] had been arguing that testing too many people, or ordering too many ventilators, would spook the markets and so we just shouldn’t do it… That advice worked far more powerfully on [Trump] than what the scientists were saying. He thinks they always exaggerate.”

Elsewhere in the FT investigation into Trump’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic, an unnamed administration official is reported to have told the paper that trying to advise the president is like “bringing fruits to the volcano… You’re trying to appease a great force that’s impervious to reason.”

What we need now is a new cold war?

Or hey, a new hot war?

Trump and his henchmen are now flailing about like a bunch of lunatics trying everything they can to distract and refocus the nation on anything but the botched response to the pandemic. There’s Obamaghazi.

And now this:

President Trump made one of his strongest comments yet in dealing with China in the wake of the communist country’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic.

“There are many things we could do,” Trump told FOX Business’ Maria Bartiromo Thursday. “We could cut off the whole relationship.”

The Trump administration has been mulling avenues to possibly punish or seek financial compensation from China for what it sees as withholding information about the virus.

The president, appearing exclusively on “Mornings with Maria,” raised the impact of ending relations.

“Now, if you did, what would happen?,” asked Trump. “You’d save $500 billion if you cut off the whole relationship.”

However, Trump and his team used other tactics to demonstrate displeasure with China’s actions. On Monday, the administration cut investment ties between U.S. federal retirement funds and Chinese equities.

In a letter obtained exclusively by FOX Business, national security adviser Robert O’Brien and Trump’s top economic adviser Larry Kudlow wrote on Monday to U.S. Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia that the White House does not want the Thrift Savings Plan — which is a federal employee retirement fund — to have money invested in Chinese equities that numbers about $4 billion in assets.

Scalia then wrote to Michael Kennedy, the chairman of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, and shared the Kudlow and O’Brien correspondence and telling Kennedy that investments in China pose “investment risk and national security” risks.

As for China’s response to inquiries about the spread of the coronavirus from the U.S., Trump told Maria Bartiromo: “We asked to go over and they said no. They didn’t want our help. And I figured that was OK because they must know what they are doing. So it was either stupidity, incompetence or deliberate.”

This lunacy just adds to the misery most of us are feeling in this lockdown. I don’t know how real any of it is. But it’s exhausting.

I just don’t know how we could possibly get through another four years of this. It’s unthinkable. And yet … it’s possible.

The right wing Hydroxychloroquine obsession

If you’ve watched the hearings with expert Dr. Bright, the whistleblower from BARDA, who claims that he tried to warn the trump administration in January and was ignored, you’ve seen wingnut after wingnut Congressman blather on endlessly about Hydroxychloroquine. They are still pushing this as a Miracle Cure Holy Grail and suggesting it’s being suppressed by the Democrats. Or something.

It’s just twisted at this point. If we need any more proof that Trump is the Dear Leader of a very powerful cult of personality, this is it. I’m just surprised they aren’t all ostentatiously drinking bleach on camera at this point.

Anyway, here’s a new piece from HuffPost about the origins of this snake oil bullshit:

President Donald Trump’s obsession with the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for the coronavirus may have started in part because of a self-described philosopher in China who is a fan of white nationalists, tweets anti-Semitic rhetoric and calls chloroquine “a Nazi drug that is here to teach a lesson to leftists about bias.” 

Weeks before Trump first promoted the drug, a Twitter conversation about hydroxychloroquine between “philosopher” Adrian Bye and two cryptocurrency investors set off a chain of events that would bring the unproven drug to the attention of Elon Musk, Fox News pundits and Trump. 

Trump has touted hydroxychloroquine as potentially “one of the biggest game-changers in the history of medicine” and repeatedly promoted its use on the coronavirus. He has asked about it both in public and privately, until recently mentioning it on a nearly daily basis, and the Trump administration has allegedly pressured health officials to distribute it despite their concerns about its safety. The drug’s bizarre path to Trump’s embrace highlights a dangerous information pipeline from questionable sources in right-wing media to the president.

On March 11, cryptocurrency investors Gregory Rigano and James Todaro mused about coronavirus treatments and potential death tolls on Twitter to their then-small number of followers. Bye, who says he has been living in the Wudang Mountains in central China for the past few years and formerly interviewed tech “thought leaders” for his startup, responded to one of Todaro’s tweets about the virus. 

“Chloroquine will keep most people out of hospital. The US hasn’t learned about that yet,” Bye replied to Todaro. 

The three briefly discussed medical studies and a YouTube video about chloroquine’s use. As Politico has reported, Rigano asked Bye for more information about chloroquine and data on its uses before telling Todaro and Bye on March 12 that he would be “publishing a report tomorrow [with an] eminent scientist, peer reviewed.”  

“thank u james and adrian. next level humans,” Rigano tweeted. 

On March 13, Rigano and Todaro touted chloroquine in a self-published, non-peer-reviewed Google doc falsely claiming to be affiliated with Stanford University School of Medicine, the National Academy of Sciences and the University of Alabama, Birmingham School of Medicine. (All three institutions told HuffPost that they had no connection to the document, and Google later removed it from its platform for violating its terms of service.) The paper largely cited a French study that scientists and the publisher of the journal it appeared in have subsequently criticized for its shaky methodology.

Bye complained to Todaro and Rigano on Twitter that their paper didn’t acknowledge him, saying, “I told you both about Chloroquine, and you didn’t even bother to mention me.” He also expressed his hesitation about the paper’s findings. Rigano replied minutes later that he wanted Bye’s permission to include him but “time was of the essence,” telling Bye to send him his email address. The Google doc was updated to include an acknowledgment of Bye.

The Google doc, with its grand claims and the help of its false affiliation with Stanford and other institutions, quickly went viral and was tweeted out to millions by prominent venture capitalists and Tesla CEO Musk ― none of whom appeared to vet its methods or sources. Fox News and other right-wing media jumped on the paper and touted the drug as a potential quick fix for the virus. Fox News host and informal Trump adviser Tucker Carlson had Rigano on his prime-time show, with Rigano falsely identified as an adviser to Stanford and claiming “what we’re here to announce is the second cure to a virus of all time.” Rigano made a similar appearance on right-wing radio host Glenn Beck’s program and with Fox News host Laura Ingraham, who then privately met with Trump in early April to promote the drug.

The day after Rigano appeared on Carlson’s show, Trump mentioned the drug during a briefing for the first time and in the following days heavily promoted it. He called himself a “big fan” and heralded it as a potential “game-changer,” though Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, cautioned against the anecdotal evidence surrounding the drug. 

There’s more at the link. These people are nuts.

Here’s more on the French scientist who ran the first bogus study on the drug that helped make Drs Ingraham and Hannity become full-time proselytisers for the drug. He’s a real piece of work.

Half of America has reverted to medievalism. Or maybe they were always this way and we just didn’t know it. Either way, it’s a very, very bad sign.

The Wild West

This is terrifying:

On Wednesday night in the heart of downtown Platteville, Wis., just hours after the Wisconsin Supreme Court threw out the state’s stay-at-home order, Nick’s on 2nd was packed wall to wall, standing room only.

It was sometime after 10 p.m. when “Long Cool Woman in a Black Dress” by the Hollies came over the sound system and a bartender took out his camera. In a Twitter broadcast, he surveyed the room of maskless patrons crammed together, partying like it was 2019. A few were pounding on the bar to the beat. Some were clapping their hands in the air and some were fist-pumping, a scene so joyous they could have been celebrating the end of the worst pandemic in a century.

Instead, as Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers (D) knew, they were just celebrating the apparent end of his power over them — at least for now.AD

“We’re the Wild West,” Evers told MSNBC’s Ali Velshi on Wednesday night, reacting to the state Supreme Court’s ruling and the scenes of people partying in bars all across Wisconsin. “There are no restrictions at all across the state of Wisconsin. … So at this point in time … there is nothing that’s compelling people to do anything other than having chaos here.”

Chaos it was.

Right after the Supreme Court’s conservative majority issued a 4-to-3 ruling, invalidating the extension of the stay-at-home order issued by Evers’s appointed state health chief, the Tavern League of Wisconsin instructed its members to feel free to “OPEN IMMEDIATELY!”

I saw some footage of one Wisconsin official saying that it’s all up to the individual now. If you don’t want to kill yourself, don’t go out.

Apparently, they’re now at a point t which the advice is: to hell with the health care workers, first responders and taxpayers who have to pay with their lives and treasure to take care of these idiots who just had to own the libs. And if your own friends and relatives die, it’s their own fault for being related to an idiot like you.

But I have a sneaking suspicion that most people are not going to go out and put themselves or their families at risk which means the economic effect is not going to be everything these suicidal Trump lovers want it to be. Are they going to start dragging customers out of their houses? If they would wait until the testing, tracing and social distancing protocols could be in place, the economy could recover more effectively. But these folks don’t believe in science and reason so that’s not going to happen.

Good luck to us.