Skip to content

Month: November 2020

Got game?

Image via New York Times.

Someone handed President Barack Obama a basketball last Saturday after a Joe Biden campaign event in Michigan. He coolly sank a three-point shot from the corner. That’s not something you just pull out of your back pocket. It takes conditioning, practice, and skills. The man’s got game.

Democrats cannot expect their committees in rural counties to sink three-pointers for their candidates after a one-hour training once every four years. But that’s how they campaign and how they lose local and statewide elections. They run up huge vote leads in a few, well-organized urban areas during early voting, then watch in horror on Election Day as Republicans in dozens of small rural counties eat their lunch.

The most interminable presidential election since 2000 is still pending final vote counting this morning. When Joe Biden prevails as expected, Never Trumper Tom Nichols will be relieved. So will quite a few more of us. Max Boot writes, “I have never been more grateful for President Trump’s incompetence. He can’t even organize a coup d’état properly.”

Nichols writes:

But no matter how this election concludes, America is now a different country. Nearly half of the voters have seen Trump in all of his splendor—his infantile tirades, his disastrous and lethal policies, his contempt for democracy in all its forms—and they decided that they wanted more of it. His voters can no longer hide behind excuses about the corruption of Hillary Clinton or their willingness to take a chance on an unproven political novice. They cannot feign ignorance about how Trump would rule. They know, and they have embraced him.

That is what scares him and the rest of us, Nichols explains. As a conservative, he did not expect the Biden landslide the polls suggested.

… I know my former tribe. Trump voters don’t care about policy. They didn’t care about it in 2016, and they don’t care about it now. The party of national security, fiscal austerity, and personal responsibility supports a president who is in the pocket of the Russians, has exploded the national deficit, and refuses to take responsibility for anything. I had hoped, at the least, that people who once insisted on the importance of presidential character would vote for basic decency after living under the most indecent president in American history.

It’s clear now that far too many of Trump’s voters don’t care about policy, decency, or saving our democracy. They care about power.

The expected Biden win feels more like a stay of execution than a victory for this creaky republic.

Both major parties are likely to take the wrong lessons from this election, Nichols fears. Republicans may conclude that more authoritarian, more racist candidates and politics will keep them in power. Republicans next time could “replace the childish and whiny Trump with someone who projects even more authoritarian determination.” Democrats driven by an ascendant progressive wing may believe “moving left, including more talk of socialism and more social-justice activism is just the tonic they’ll need to shore up their coalition.”

Nichols’s assessment is correct. The party of Trump does not care about policy. It does not care about character. It holds no principle sacred save might makes right. We are in grave danger.

But I disagree with some progressive colleagues about how to defeat Trumpism. Many blame party elders’ reflexive centrism for Democrats’ inability to convert abstract popular support for progressive policies into legislative wins and governing majorities. I maintain that oppositely charged political ideology alone will not neutralize Trumpism.

Thirty years of conservative talk radio and 24-hour cable news turned politics across a large swath of the country into sports entertainment and prepared the ground for Trumpism. A deeply damaged man, Trump is not a politician. He is an entertainer. He once “owned” a piece of the World Wrestling Federation. He sells what red America is buying. Supporters follow his rallies like fans follow rock bands. Trumpers come not for policies but for the show. They come to be told their place atop the social order is safe from encroachment by Others. They come to see Trump smack down their enemies.  

Donald Trump won largely on celebrity and perceived “charisma.” (There’s no accounting for taste.)  But he had help in rural America of those thirty years of conservative talk doing Republicans’ organizing for them. It is certainly not because Republicans there are better organized.

Barack Obama won in 2008 not on being as progressive as progressives could wish. He too won on having the charisma to inspire an army of voters and volunteers. (He needed them to carry out a solid campaign plan.) Joe Biden had Donald Trump and COVID-19. But finding candidates with Obama-level charisma is a game of chance. Better to be good than lucky.

Politics in the abstract may be a contest of ideas. Politics on the ground is a contest of skills. The highest turnout in 120 years did not give Democrats the sweeping repudiation of Trump they desired. Belief that more-progressive candidates would give whichever leftover Democrats and independents did not turn out in this election the extra jolt to turn out in the next is misplaced.

Neglected Democratic committees in rural counties from coast to coast need basic skills comparable to Obama’s in basketball. Time after time, Republicans out there devour vote leads Democratic campaigns run up in densely blue cities. We cannot defeat the looming threat to the republic with raw enthusiasm and leftier policies no matter how popular polls show they are. If this election proved nothing else, it is that believing polls is a fool’s game.

The Democratic Party virtually disappears between elections in redder, rural areas. In election after election, Democrats expect well-financed, top-of-ticket candidates to parachute in expertise every couple of years. But that’s primarily into cities in swing states where lie the largest blocks of blue votes. The day after the election, that expertise parachutes out again leaving behind little except leftover office supplies.

Democrats need instead to develop native skills in smaller counties for winning rural victories or at least for shaving rural Republicans’ margins enough to protect Democrats’ urban ones. Gov. Howard Dean got that. If you don’t show up to play, you forfeit. And if you do show up to play, you’d better have game.

Right thinking alone won’t defeat Trumpism. One might as well show up at the Olympics with no conditioning and no skills and expect to compete on enthusiasm and good thoughts. Try sinking a three-pointer from the corner with just those.

The Grim Reaper’s next move

This has been a tumultuous week, to say the least. But if there was one silver lining — even before Joe Biden’s apparent or imminent victory — it was the blessed 36 hours in which we didn’t have to hear Donald Trump’s voice. After his obnoxious declaration of victory at 2:30 a.m. on Wednesday morning, he stuck to primal tweeting until Thursday evening when he emerged to make the worst speech of his career. He disconsolately rattled off a fantasy laundry list of voting irregularities and declared, “If you count the legal votes, I easily win. If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election from us.” Reading haltingly from a script, he rambled about media conspiracies and lied about vote-rigging, saying, “Ultimately, I have a feeling judges are going to have to rule” which he has always believed was his failsafe. It set a new standard for awful, which is really saying something.

Once again, a majority of Americans were no doubt horrified, embarrassed and frightened that their so-called president was declaring the American system that elected him to be corrupt because he is now on track to lose.

If you wondered where Trump was getting all these alleged horror stories, you need look no further than his favorite news network. It’s on Fox News that the conspiracy theories and propaganda have been disseminated to the faithful who were already primed to believe that a Biden presidency cannot be legitimate because Trump told them so. He is continuing to tell them so, and there’s a good chance that a large number of Americans will never accept the legitimacy of this election based upon Trump’s outrageous lies to cover for his failure. Here’s a little taste of what they’re seeing:

After watching Trump’s atrocious speech, I thought perhaps the Republican establishment might take a breath and do one of those “Goldwater walks” to the White House to tell Trump it was time to hang up the gloves. It really was that bad. As usual, that was a vain hope. There have been a few half-hearted remonstrations from former GOP officials and commentators. Beyond Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a longtime Trump critic, and Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, who’s been lukewarm toward Trump all along, hardly any prominent Republicans have spoken out. 

Trump’s adult sons have taken their angry demands to social media, urging elected Republicans to step up in defense of their father, and saying they would “remember” who failed. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri stepped up to announce that he was very concerned about the “confusion” and would introduce “election integrity” legislation. Former UN ambassador Nikki HaleySen. Rick Scott of Florida and Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas also jumped in to back Trump, without being entirely specific about his claims. Advertisement:Trump may lose 2020, but his followers havegrownGo To Video Page

But it was Lindsey Graham, the newly re-elected senator from South Carolina, who outdid himself, going on Fox News and slobbering all over the camera, apparently vying for the dubious honor of most obsequious Trump bootlicker of the week:

Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, a likely 2024 candidate, also got in on the action:

This “observer” hysteria was resolved earlier. But apparently they’ve decided this is the magic bullet that, in some unknown fashion, may require a do-over of the whole election. Or, if Sean Hannity has his way, maybe just have Trump declared president for life.

You’ll notice that with the exception of Haley, all the Republican luminaries rushing to Trump’s defense are members of the U.S. Senate. You have to wonder why they would feel so strongly about fighting for a Trump victory that has clearly slipped away. Sure, they might feel that Trump will continue to have influence in the party for a while, but Cruz and Hawley have four more years in their terms, while Cotton and Graham just got re-elected. It’s possible they are all made men in the Trump cult, but I doubt it. All of them have big ambitions, and it’s difficult to believe they actually believe it will be good for them to perpetuate Trump’s struggle to overturn this election result on the basis of phony allegations made up to soothe his shattered ego.

Aside from reflexively responding to the call of the Trump scions, they may have a compelling reason. They may not care much about Donald Trump getting another term, but they care deeply about keeping their Senate majority. They need him to keep stirring up the base in advance of a likely double cage match in Georgia come January. There are almost certain to be two Senate runoff elections there that could yet tip the balance of the Senate to the Democrats.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made no comment about Trump’s antics on Thursday evening. And he’s been quite cagey about Trump in recent weeks, saying he hasn’t been to the White House recently because of its lax COVID protocols and even gently chiding the president for his election night speech, saying that all the votes should be counted. But I would imagine he’ll walk over hot coals to help Trump now if it means keeping his majority. Power is the air Mitch breathes.

Democrats had better get some sleep this weekend and then get ready for round two. The disappointment of all those defeats in Senate races hasn’t really sunk in with all the anxiety surrounding the presidential race. But it’s a huge problem. If McConnell remains in charge of the Senate, we can kiss the Democratic agenda good-bye. He is a ruthless opposition leader who is already giving notice that he plans to veto any Biden cabinet choice that doesn’t please him. There will be no liberal judges, and if another Supreme Court justice dies or retires, that seat could well stay empty indefinitely. He will enable Graham and other Senate committee chairs to run endless investigations into Biden and his family, regardless of the merits.

And of course, any hopes of the legislation required to clean up this mess and actually improve the lives of the American people will be dashed. In fairness, we should note that even if Democrats had won the majority, there’s no guarantee the Senate could pass any progressive legislation, thanks to both the filibuster rule and the presence of conservative Democrats who become very powerful veto points of their own. Nonetheless, it’s necessary to have a majority simply to set the legislative agenda and with these domineering Republicans running the Senate we are looking at gridlock. Again.Advertisement:https://a313f5dfbacca19e5b16ebc37bb8c73f.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

I don’t know if the Democrats can gain those two Senate seats in Georgia. But you can bet that Mitch McConnell will do everything he can to prevent it. If that means helping Donald Trump turn this country inside out over the next couple of months so that his people stay active and engaged, he will do it. And so will his troops. If the last four years have shown us anything, it’s that any niggling concerns Republicans might have about destroying our democracy are easily disregarded, when it’s a question of maintaining their own power.

My Salon column

We were not hacked

Just a technical problem. During the most important political week in four years. No biggie.

Grrrr.

A few new posts below that didn’t make it before the crash…We’ll be back to our usual schedule tomorrow.

This has been going on for quite a while

2004:

Like many Americans, I spent the evening of the 2004 election watching the returns on television and wondering how the exit polls, which predicted an overwhelming victory for John Kerry, had gotten it so wrong. By midnight, the official tallies showed a decisive lead for George Bush — and the next day, lacking enough legal evidence to contest the results, Kerry conceded. 

It was later determined that votes were ruthlessly suppressed in African American precincts in an election overseen by a ruthlessly partisan GOP Secretary of State. And it was one of those huge disappointment nights in which we assumed from the polling that Kerry was going to win, the exit polls early in in the day had everyone celebrating and then, as the night wore, we saw George W. Bush slowly take the lead with Ohio hanging in the balance.

I don’t think I need to recapitulate 2016.

There have always been close elections, of course. Look at Kennedy Nixon in 1960. But the only election I can remember being an unadulterated victory in the last 20 years is 2008. Even 2012 seemed like it might be a nailbiter that didn’t turn out to be. So Donald Trump’s insistence that the election should be “called” on election night is a throwback to some elections in his past. Since the country re-sorted the two parties into an ideologically polarized body politic centered in individual states, elections tend to be close, because of the electoral college. (The Senate, as well.) Obama was the outlier in 08.

Where ever did he get that idea?

This evening Trump gave one of the most pathetic, embarrassing speeches of his life and that’s saying something. It was yet another low point and I didn’t think he could go any lower:

He had a lot of conspiracy theories at his fingertips and anecdotes of individual cheating and skulduggery that nobody’s ever heard of. I wondered where he’d heard of all this.

Well:

Over the past several days, as the president’s re-election chances grow ostensibly dimmer, Fox News’ most vociferously pro-Trump stars have seemingly grown desperate, floating baseless “fraud” allegations or conspiracy theories, parroting outright lies from the internet’s fever swamps, or making wildly undemocratic suggestions for Team Trump to prevent a Biden presidency.

In fact, at least one Fox News star has suggested that Republicans should actively disregard the will of voters altogether. Mark Levin, a well-known conservative talk-radio host who hosts a weekend show for Fox, suggested in an all-caps Twitter screed that GOP-controlled state legislatures should disregard the vote tallies and appoint electors who will select Trump in the end. His suggestion to outright curtail the democratic process was boosted by Donald Trump Jr.

REMINDER TO THE REPUBLICAN STATE LEGISLATURES, YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY OVER THE CHOOSING OF ELECTORS, NOT ANY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY OF STATE, GOVERNOR, OR EVEN COURT. YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY — ARTICLE II OF THE FED CONSTITUTION. SO, GET READY TO DO YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 5, 2020

In the days since the election, Fox News has seemed internally torn on how to handle the outcome of the 2020 election. Many of the network’s opinion stars have criticized or questioned the network’s news-side projection that Biden will win Arizona, all but dooming Trump’s path to victory. The Arizona call put a damper on the Trump campaign’s election night party at the White House—which was attended by Fox News stars like Laura Ingraham—and The New York Times reported that White House adviser Jared Kushner even called network mogul Rupert Murdoch to push for a retraction.

Fox hosts have insisted without any evidence that there were widespread election “shenanigans,” fraud, and chicanery by both Democrats and the media working to tip the election in Biden’s favor.

Top election officials in key states have investigated and refuted many of the voter-fraud claims pushed by Trump supporters, but that hasn’t stopped Fox News stars from boosting the allegations.

Weekend host and Trump pal Jeanine Pirro tweeted on Thursday that the 2020 election has been a “massive fraud” on a national scale. She called for federal law-enforcement officials at the FBI and DOJ to intervene in some way. Her tweet was flagged by the social-media platform as being potentially “misleading about an election or other civic process.”

Complaints of #voterfraud on a national scale in a presidential election . Where is the @FBI Where is the #DOJ ?ADVERTISING

— Jeanine Pirro (@JudgeJeanine)November 5, 2020

Other Fox News stars have given oxygen to a debunked viral claim—boosted by Trump on Twitter—that Biden was mysteriously gifted in one fell swoop with more than 100,000 votes by the state of Michigan in the middle of Tuesday night.

Fox Business Network host Maria Bartiromo, long one of the president’s most sycophantic allies on the network, promoted an article from far-right digital outlet The Federalist touting the baseless claim about the Michigan dump of votes, which was ultimately nothing more than a typo that was quickly fixed by both the state and electoral data site Decision Desk HQ.

Nevertheless, Bartiromo’s tweet—which was flagged by Twitter as being “misleading”—was quickly amplified by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who added: “if true, this is HIGHLY disturbing.”

Apparently not satisfied with peddling just one election-related conspiracy, Bartiromo continued unabated on Thursday morning, collecting her favorite baseless theories into one big round-up tweet, which included the bonkers conspiracy theory—dubbed “Sharpie Gate”—alleging Arizona election officials deliberately invalidated ballots for the president by giving pro-Trump voters felt-tipped pens. The state debunked the theory, confirming that felt-tipped marker ink can be read by their ballot-processing equipment.

-4am dump/Wisconsin 65,000 votes 100% for Biden
-4am dump/Michigan 138,499 votes 100% 4Biden
-AZ poll workers forcing voters to use sharpies thereby invalidated ballots
-Trump leading in GA, NC, PA, WI, MI & they stop counting” before the vote fairy visits overnight…— Maria Bartiromo (@MariaBartiromo) November 5, 2020

Bartiromo’s fellow Trump-boosting Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, who also serves as an informal presidential adviser, also pushed conspiracies about the Michigan ballots, sharing an article from disreputable right-wing blog The Gateway Pundit alleging widespread ballot stuffing in the state. The evidence: a cart seen inside a ballot-counting office that ultimately was just a local ABC affiliate photographer’s equipment in a hand-pulled wagon.

WATCH: Suitcases and Coolers Rolled Into Detroit Voting Center at 4 AM, Brought Into Secure Counting Area https://t.co/ikamH2C9mB— Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) November 5, 2020

And during a Wednesday morning appearance on Fox Business show Varney & Co., Fox News contributor Tammy Bruce worried that Democrats were acting like Soviet dictator Josef Stalin by including these “128,000 new votes in Michigan, 100 percent of which went to Joe Biden” (again, the conspiracy theory centered around what was ultimately a typo). She went on to add that this was akin to a “soft coup” as pro-Biden forces were “falsifying votes or doing shenanigans.”

Elsewhere on Fox, Trump campaign lawyer Jenna Ellis peddled on primetime star Tucker Carlson’s show the Michigan vote dump falsehood—even though it had been thoroughly discredited well before her appearance. Nevertheless, Carlson credulously bought Ellis’ false claim, touting it as further proof of widespread election fraud being used to steal the election for Biden.

“One hundred percent of the ballots,” Carlson said in disbelief. “One hundred percent of anything ought to make you nervous because it’s probably a crock. And that does not seem believable to me.”

“Very suspicious,” Ellis responded.

“You think?!” Carlson exclaimed.

While many of Fox’s right-wing stars have pushed lies and conspiracies, some of the network’s “straight news” reporters and anchors have taken to actively shutting down their colleagues’ more bombastic suggestions.

On Wednesday, Fox News analyst Chris Stirewalt dismissed criticism of the network’s Arizona call, saying the Trump team was simply “trying to prevent a narrative” that the president might lose the election.

And during a Thursday segment, reporter Jonathan Hunt described the Trump team’s legal challenge press conference as “bizarre,” noting that there was no evidence presented for their claims of widespread voter fraud. “Perhaps they are holding that evidence so that a judge is the first person to see it but at the moment, it’s simply a grab bag of complaints trying to see what might stick to the wall,” he said.

Fox News reporter Jonathan Hunt isn’t buying the Trump campaign’s voter fraud Nevada lawsuit.

“Perhaps they are holding that evidence so that a judge is the first person to see it but at the moment, it’s simply a grab bag of complaints trying to see what might stick to the wall” pic.twitter.com/2QSbHfEiGx— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) November 5, 2020

And in another Thursday afternoon segment, veteran Fox News anchor Chris Wallace further shot down Team Trump’s baseless allegations of widespread voter and election fraud. “There is nothing that rises to the level that it could be enough fraud to switch votes when you’re talking about thousands and thousands of votes between the two candidates,” he noted.

Still, other hosts have been more subtle in their attempts to rage against a potential Biden victory. While not making any allegations of fraud, for example, The Five co-host Greg Gutfeld laid the groundwork to question overall electoral integrity based on a fundamental misreading of how elections work.

During a Wednesday segment of the late-afternoon chat show, Gutfeld made a bizarre analogy comparing how Biden was behind in the vote on Tuesday evening and then ahead by most accounts on Wednesday morning to a poorly cooked Thanksgiving turkey that someone had tampered with in the oven.

“You spend time preparing for the meal and you put it in the oven and you set it and forget it. Six hours, seven hours, that’s what it is,” he said. “I don’t expect somebody in the middle of the night to come in and open up and screw the turkey, which is what happened last night. They screwed the turkey. It’s all this stuff goes on—you wake up and something is going on. I thought that was really strange.”

When the show returned the next day, the hosts tried to clarify that they were not suggesting there was a voter-fraud conspiracy afoot, just that they were simply asking the media to prove that there was no conspiracy afoot.

“No one is specifically on this show at least accusing anybody of committing fraud. All we’re saying is, show us there isn’t fraud,” host Jesse Watters said, demanding more transparency from the election process in Philadelphia, where the state election board has been publicly live-streaming its vote-counting process.

Fox is the problem.

Yes, Republicans tried to stop the counting of votes in 2000

I keep hearing people saying “the GOP has never tried to stop the counting of votes before, not even in Florida.” James Baker told the NY Times Peter Baker that, who told that to the MSNBC audience this afternoon.

Balderdash. That’s exactly what they did.

“I’m with the Bush-Cheney team, and I’m here to stop the count.”

Those were the words John Bolton yelled as he burst into a Tallahassee library on Saturday, Dec. 9, 2000, where local election workers were recounting ballots cast in Florida’s disputed presidential race between George W. Bush and Al Gore.

Bolton was one of the pack of lawyers for the Republican presidential ticket who repeatedly sought to shut down recounts of the ballots from Florida counties before those counts revealed that Gore had actually won the state’s electoral votes and the presidency.

The December 9 intervention was Bolton’s last and most significant blow against the democratic process.

The Florida Supreme Court had ordered a broad recount of ballots in order to finally resolve the question of who won the state. But Bolton and the Bush-Cheney team got their Republican allies on the U.S. Supreme Court to block the review. Fearing that each minute of additional counting would reveal the reality of voter sentiments in Florida, Bolton personally rushed into the library to stop the count.

Bolton was in South Korea when it became clear that the Nov. 7, 2000, election would be decided in Florida. At the behest of former Secretary of State James Baker, who fronted the Bush-Cheney team during the Florida fight, Bolton winged his way to Palm Beach, where he took the lead in challenging ballots during that county’s recount. Then, when the ballots from around the state were transported to Tallahassee for the recount ordered by the state Supreme Court, Bolton followed them.

It was there that he personally shut down the review of ballots from Miami-Dade County, a populous and particularly contested county where independent reviews would later reveal that hundreds of ballots that could reasonably have been counted for Gore were instead discarded.

Miami-Dade County Elections Supervisor David Leahy argued at the time that 2,257 voters had apparently attempted to mark ballot cards for Gore or Bush but had not had them recorded because they had been improperly inserted into the voting machines. A hand count of those ballots revealed that 302 more of them would have gone for Gore than Bush. That shift in the numbers from just one of Florida’s 67 counties would have erased more than half of Bush’s 537-vote lead in the state.

But attempts to conduct a hand count were repeatedly blocked by the Bush-Cheney team, culminating with Bolton’s December 9 announcement that, “I’m here to stop the count.” A few days later, the U.S. Supreme Court would stop the count permanently, with a pro-Bush ruling in which five Republican-appointed justices, in the words of noted attorney Vincent Bugliosi, “committed the unpardonable sin of being a knowing surrogate for the Republican Party instead of being an impartial arbiter of the law.”

Please don’t try to sell on the idea that Trump came up with this idea of stopping the vote count all by himself. He did not. His problem is that he will have to make this play in a number of states where Biden’s lead is much wider than 538 votes as it was in Florida. Of course, that won’t stop him. He is going to make a mess of this one way or another.

But let’s not pretend that the Republican party didn’t write the template for stopping the vote count. They did.

They’re Baaaaack

Actually, they never left.

I made the point for years that the Tea Party was just rebranded conservative movement “grassroots” groups, and so too are many of the Trump groups. It’s the same people:

A rapidly growing Facebook group falsely accusing Democrats of “scheming” to steal the election with a plot to “nullify Republican votes” appears to be part of a coordinated campaign by Republican operatives, and has ties to the tea party.  The domain is registered to a firm that works on Republican projects.

The “Stop the Steal” group on Facebook, which was only created on Wednesday but already has almost 300,000 members (and is growing quickly), prompts new users to its page to navigate to a website off of Facebook to sign up for email updates “in the event that social media censors this group.”

The domain that the group pushes its members to, StolenElection.us, is registered to the Liberty Lab, a firm that offers digital services to various conservative clients, according to its website, and Scott Graves, who lists himself as the firm’s president on LinkedIn. 

It’s unclear if Graves and the Liberty Lab are running the site alone or were hired by a client. According to its website, the Liberty Lab has been employed by a range of organizations, with a notable track record of working on Republican projects, including Newt Gingrich’s 2012 campaign, a push to recall California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, and several pro-Trump projects.

The Facebook group and the website also appear to be linked to Women for America First, a group organized in 2019 to protest against Donald Trump’s impeachment. In StolenElection.us’s html code, “Women for America First” shows up repeatedly. Facebook displays a header on the “Stop the Steal” Facebook page showing that it was created by the “Women for America First” Facebook page. 

Women for America First is a nonprofit co-founded and led by Amy Kremer, a former tea party activist. Mother Jones’ Stephanie Mencimer wrote about Kremer and her work boosting Republicans last year: 

A former Delta flight attendant who calls herself one of the “founding mothers” of the tea party movement, Kremer was the longtime chief executive of the Tea Party Express, which organized bus tours across the country and worked on a variety of campaigns in 2010 and 2012 to help Republicans retake Congress. One of the best known tea party groups, the Tea Party Express was also well known for being run by a political action committee that raised tons of money from small donors and spent most of it on the political consultants who started the PAC rather than on candidates.

While the tea party did turn out large amounts of conservatives, it was famously the result of a successful astroturf campaign spearheaded by wealthy conservatives, including the Koch brothers.

It’s always been a massive grift. I assume they see some opportunity to protfit from this as well.

Trumpism is the conservative movement repurposed for the moment. It will move on to something else once Trump is gone. For now they’re going to go where the action is. That’s what they do.

Where the haphazard legal cases stand

From Amelia Thomson-Deveaux at 538:

As we wait for results in a handful of states, the Trump campaign has been busy filing lawsuits alleging various kinds of voting-related misconduct and trying to intervene as a party in the Pennsylvania ballot deadline case at the Supreme Court. That might sound serious, but it’s important to remember that anyone can file a lawsuit, so the mere fact of bringing an issue to court doesn’t mean it’s a decisive issue — or even evidence of actual wrongdoing. So here’s an overview of where the litigation stands and what the outcome might be. In most cases, the issues that are being raised do not appear to be especially consequential, at least right now.

Pennsylvania

The Trump campaign and other Republicans have filed multiple lawsuits in Pennsylvania, claiming various kinds of election-related irregularities:A lawsuit filed in state court by the Trump campaign claiming that observers were not able to “meaningfully” oversee the count, and asking for the count to be stopped. On Thursday, a state appellate court issued an order guaranteeing that GOP ballot observers can watch the process within six feet. The order did not stop the count in Philadelphia, however.

Another lawsuit filed in state court by the Trump campaign and the RNC that tries to move up the deadline for when mail-in voters with missing ID information would need to provide that information. Currently the deadline is Nov. 12, but the Trump campaign wants it to be changed to Nov. 9.

Another state court lawsuit filed by Pennsylvania Republican candidates and voters, involving ballots that were corrected during the initial ballot-processing (“pre-canvassing”) period on Nov. 3.

A federal case filed by a Republican candidate objecting to the process of “curing” or correcting problems with mail-in ballots in Montgomery County, just outside Philadelphia. At a hearing yesterday, the judge in the case seemed skeptical that the Republican claims had affected the integrity of the election, and in any case, a relatively small number of ballots (fewer than 100) appear to have been affected.

The Trump campaign has asked to intervene as a party in the Supreme Court litigation over Pennsylvania’s ballot-receipt deadline, which was extended to Friday by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. 

The Supreme Court has declined twice to overrule the deadline, but several conservative justices indicated that they might be willing to revisit the case, potentially throwing the validity of any ballots postmarked on Election Day that arrive in that three-day window into question. However, it’s also not clear whether a large number of ballots are actually arriving late — Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar said on Wednesday that there are only “hundreds” so far.

Michigan

The Trump campaign is suing to stop the vote count in Michigan, claiming that it was not given access to observe the counting, and asking to review ballots that it was not able to witness. It’s not clear what the campaign is really trying to accomplish here, since Biden is leading in the state. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson also said that the claim “doesn’t really line up with the facts.”

Georgia

The Trump campaign and the Georgia GOP filed a lawsuit asking a judge in Chatham County to make sure that late-arriving ballots are being properly segregated from on-time ballots. (In Georgia, ballots must be received by 7 p.m. on Election Day to count.) The campaign claims that the county might be mishandling ballots, but this appears to be based on a single allegation from a Republican poll observer involving a small number of ballots. In any case, the lawsuit isn’t seeking to stop on-time ballots from being counted.

Wisconsin

The Trump campaign has indicated that it will file a formal recount request in Wisconsin — but this can’t happen until the last county has submitted its canvass to the state elections commission, which will happen sometime between Nov. 10 and 17. (And it’s worth mentioning here that recounts rarely reverse the outcome of elections — including in 2016, when Trump’s lead over Clinton was basically unchanged after a Wisconsin recount.)

I actually thought they’d have a good legal strategy because Republicans have a lot of election lawyers primed for this sort of thing. I have to wonder if the good ones, like Ben Ginsberg, layed out. It says something if they did.

Mitch McConnell: America’s Overlord

It looks like The Grim Reaper still believes he is our one true god and I guess he probably is unless the Democrats can get those two run-off seats in Georgia in January. Oy.

Anyway, here’s what we’re facing if Mitch remains majority leader:

Republicans’ likely hold on the Senate is forcing Joe Biden’s transition team to consider limiting its prospective Cabinet nominees to those who Mitch McConnell can live with, according to people familiar with the matter.

The new Senate political math could dash the ambitions of some Democrats, including those who have clashed with Republicans.It could push Biden to go with more centrist options, like Lael Brainard for Treasury or Tony Blinken for State, sources tell Axios.

Susan Rice and Stacey Abrams could be early casualties, depending on McConnell’s posture.

But it could also open paths for others, like Sen. Chris Coons, who could benefit from a tradition of senatorial courtesy for quick confirmations of nominees within its ranks.

A source close to McConnell tells Axios a Republican Senate would work with Biden on centrist nominees but no “radical progressives” or ones who are controversial with conservatives.

The Biden agenda would be severely restricted by GOP control, the source added: “It’s going to be armed camps.”

The process is in its early stages as Biden officials await final numbers on the size of the majority, and any potential signals from McConnell about whether he’ll fight every nominee or focus on one or two examples.

Traditionally, an incoming president is given wide berth to pick his desired team.

This political reality could result in Biden having a more centrist Cabinet.It also gives Biden a ready excuse to reject left-of-center candidates, like Sens. Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders, who have the enthusiastic backing of progressives.

Biden had already been considering an informal ban on nominating Democratic senators to avoid uncertainty about who would fill their seats.

Rice, who was Barack Obama’s former UN ambassador and national security adviser, has long been considered in the running for secretary of state or another Cabinet position.But she clashed with Republicans and became a lightning rod while defending the administration’s response to the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.

Biden vetted Rice for vice president, and she was projected as a top pick for State after being passed over for Kamala Harris.

“For those interested in facts, Ambassador Rice has twice been unanimously confirmed by the Senate,” said Erin Pelton, a Rice spokesperson, referring to two confirmations before the Benghazi controversy.

Abrams, the former Georgia House minority leader, also faces a tough time being confirmed by a Republican Senate.

Sally Yates, who is under consideration for Attorney General, could face resistance because of her role in the Justice Department’s investigation into Trump’s national security adviser Michael Flynn.

In August, Yates defended her role before Congress and accused Flynn of “neutering” American sanctions on Russia.

 Biden may end up leaning more on Democratic senators in blue states, or ex-senators.That could boost Coons’ case for State. And Alabama Sen. Doug Jones, who lost on Tuesday, may have an easier time than Yates at Justice.

If Biden appoints Coons to State, Democrats wouldn’t be down a seat in the Senate, as Delaware’s Democratic governor John Carney could quickly appoint Rep. Lisa Blunt Rochester to the seat. That would ensure Senate Democrats have at least one Black woman in their ranks.

I am having some very uncharitable thoughts about those purple hands of his, hoping that it means something … well … bad.

Look, the reality here is that even if Democrats had won the Senate with some “centrist” Senators from red states like Alaska, this could still have been the case. When the Democratic majority is very narrow, red state Senators have tremendous sway and they could easily make the same demands.

The Senate is just as undemocratic as the electoral college. A minority rules and even when you get a majority of Democratic Senators, many of them are from red states and they represent that minority as well. The only real advantage to a majority, and it’s hugely important, is that you get the the ability to decide what to bring to the floor. But when it comes to vote, it’s often just as much of a mess as it is when Republicans are in the majority.

If you don’t believe me — remember the problems we had with the Obamacare legislation and Democrats had a huge majority. (You oldsters will recall “the cornhusker compromise”, Blanche Lincoln, Joe Lieberman etc … ) Democrats always have to deal with conservative divas in their own party because the undemocratic Senate over-represents conservatives. It’s maddening. But it’s a reality.