Skip to content

Month: February 2021

Nerd alert

Well, they can’t keep the power on down south in Texas today. But let’s see if good old yankee ingenuity can land another rover on Mars (CNN):

Landing day is finally here. The NASA Perseverance rover, which has been on a 292.5 million-mile journey from Earth since July 30, is expected to land on Mars Thursday around 3:55 p.m. ET.

Perseverance is NASA’s first mission that will search for signs of ancient life on another planet to help answer the big question: Was life ever present on Mars?

The rover will explore Jezero Crater, the site of an ancient lake that existed 3.9 billion years ago, and search for microfossils in the rocks and soil there. Follow-up missions will return samples of this site collected by Perseverance to Earth by the 2030s.

Along for the ride with Perseverance is an experiment to fly a helicopter, called Ingenuity, on another planet for the first time.

Artist’s impression of the Perseverance rover, with the mini-helicopter Ingenuity in front of it. (Wikipedia)

Live coverage begins streaming at 2:15 p.m. ET.

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory offers this simulation for how the landing is supposed to work after the “seven minutes of terror” between the lander entering the atmosphere and actually touching down. The signal travel time between Mars and Earth means mission specialists have no control over what happens during the sequence. The lander is on its own.

JPL veteran and glitteratti Mark Rober sets up landing day and provides some background on what Perseverance will do with its time on Mars. The “Poop, Scoop, and Shoot” part of the mission will in time return core samples to Earth for analysis that cannot be done on Mars.

I watched Ridley Scott’s The Martian (2015) again the other day. As a former engineer, all the “science the shit out of this” problem-solving (even the Hollywood stuff) and the improvized solutions have a real appeal for me. It’s what I used to do for clients in places like this (below).

Guess what I’ll be doing just before 4 p.m. ET?

Malign neglect

BBC radio last night reported Texans were burning their furniture to stay warm. Think about that. Now quick, flip to an aerial shot of a U.S. naval armada and change the subject to America’s greatness.

So far the forecast ice storm here in the Cesspool of Sin has been a bust (thankfully), but residents are still getting snow this morning in San Antonio, Texas. In Dallas, The Atlantic‘s Andrew Exum was still without power yesterday. His dog’s water dish in the kitchen was frozen Tuesday morning.

It’s what happens when you put people who don’t believe in government in charge of running it. Ask the half million Americans dead from COVID-19. Right, you can’t.

Exum explains:

There is a certain kind of conservative politician here in Texas who spends a sizable part of his day obsessing about the state of California. Such politicians have spent much of the past few years mercilessly teasing the progressive leadership of California for the failures of the state’s power grid.

These politicians have been, for the most part, conspicuously quiet since the crisis began here. The state’s governor, Greg Abbott, has mostly popped up on reliably friendly media outlets—local news stations, the evening shows on Fox News—where he knows he will not face hard questions.

But hard questions will be asked, because the failures of ERCOT ultimately belong to the leaders of a state who insisted that, by design, the buck must stop with them and not with the federal government. “The ERCOT grid has collapsed in exactly the same manner as the old Soviet Union,” one expert told the Houston Chronicle. “It limped along on underinvestment and neglect until it finally broke under predictable circumstances.”

Texas’s go-it-alone aversion to federal oversight contributed, to be sure. Plus it’s conservative faith in an all-seeing, all-knowing Market. And citizens’ conditioned to hate taxes. And their expectation of getting reliable services on the cheap. All from people who, if they think that much about it, will look you in the eye and remind you there is no free lunch in this country. Who is taking bets Texas Republicans going without hot lunches this week will learn from the experience?

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory
Note: Click to enlarge.

Gov. Abbott and Fox News instead blamed frozen Texas wind turbines that don’t freeze up in Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana. What failed was unwinterized gas and nuclear plants that went offline in the cold, Julie A. Cohn explains from in front of her fireplace. Texas’s isolation from other national power grids made it virtually impossible to import electricity.

Axios observes, “Between extreme weather events, a pandemic and an attack on democracy itself, America has been pummeled with the kinds of existential disasters that usually come along once every 100 years — and are testing whether we still have the ability to overcome them.”

Somewhere in America, the next aging highway bridge is ductile-fracturing its way to eventual collapse.

Aunt Millie is freezing

“Texans would be without electricity for longer than three days to keep the federal government out of their business.” –— Rick Perry

You’ll recall that he was most recently the US Secretary of Energy in the Trump administration. Yeah. Before that he was the Governor of Texas for two terms.

This Washington Post article by a Texas resident takes a look at the history of the electric grid and demonstrates that it has actually had its benefits, not the least of which is the fact that its independence allowed it to experiment successfully with renewables. That Perry and Abbot and other throwbacks are using this emergency as an excuse to end that experiment makes it even more despicable. And the way they do “surge” pricing is nothing short of scandalous, much like the “Aunt Millie” Enron scandal in California 15 or so years ago.

Here’s the conclusion:

Ultimately, this outage, like many of the biggest blackouts before it, reflects the challenge of unanticipated events and consequences. In 1965, power system experts felt sure they had built in enough redundancy to prevent any cascading power failure from ever happening. But they did not envision the way dozens of different operators would respond when one relay setting caused unexpected power movement across the networks. In Texas, we know that our summers will be exceedingly hot, pushing our power system to the limit, but the last time it was this cold was in 1989, and this year’s winter storms will last longer. Our wind turbines do not have the cold protection that turbines do in the cold north. Our overall system is not winterized. The conditions of this cold front and its effects on the power system were simply beyond what power experts generally planned for.

From my chilly living room, I can reflect on our state’s unique approach to power systems, both the benefits and the shortfalls, and simply hope that we will learn quickly from this weather event. No doubt there will be accusations, investigations, pontifications and extrapolations in the weeks and months to come. Surely, we can plan for our weather extremes more effectively, winterize our system more thoroughly, back up our renewables more completely, and (dare I say it?) ask customers to pay more for resiliency. I imagine there are a few million Texans ready to chip in right now. And maybe we can even reconsider links east and west to facilitate sharing more power when it gets really, really hot or really, really cold. Texans shouldn’t have to start shopping for generators to prepare for the next hot summer or winter storm.

Unanticipated events and consequences are going to be much more common in the years to come. It would be nice if we could expect our political leaders wto take the necessary steps to deal with this. I’m not holding my breath, certainly not with the Republican leadership in Texas.

Are we taking our foot off the brake too soon?

It sure looks like it to me. The pressure to stop masking, open bars, restaurants and schools is building largely, I believe, because the knowledge that the vaccines are here and they work, people think it’s all over. This past President’s Day 3-day weekend had 5 million travellers — the highest numbers in a year.

The problem is, it’s not over:

COVID-19 infection and hospitalization rates are falling nationwide, but experts talk in dire terms about what will happen if variants of the virus are allowed to surge this spring. 

“I’m very worried we’re letting our foot off the brakes,” said Atul Gawande, a surgeon at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 

The U.S. saw a spike in cases last spring, mainly in the Northeast, last summer in the South, and November through January pretty much everywhere. As the nation’s death toll from COVID-19 approaches half a million people, public health experts said they dread the possibility of a fourth wave. 

“We are done with it, but it is not done with us,” added Dr. Luciana Borio, former acting chief scientist of the Food and Drug Administration.

Three state legislatures lifted mask mandates in recent days, and New York and Massachusetts eased restrictions on restaurant seating in time for Valentine’s Day. 

“It’s like we’re trying our best to help the virus rather than stopping it,” said Theodora Hatziioannou, a virologist and research associate professor at the Rockefeller University in New York City. 

More contagious variants of the virus have raced across Europe, South Africa and Latin America. They have all arrived in the U.S., and one first identified in the United Kingdom is likely to be dominant here by the end of next month, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Peter Hotez, dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said that if the infectiousness and case fatality rate for the variant known as B.1.1.7, turns out to be the same in the U.S. as it is in the U.K., “I worry we could reach a staggering death toll by the summer and fall.”

Another variant, which originated in Southern California, has been spreading rapidly across the U.S., according to a study, although it’s not clear whether it’s more contagious or more dangerous. Many more may be here, too, according to one early review, though again, the significance of all these variants isn’t clear.

The two vaccines available, one by Pfizer-BioNTech and the other by Moderna, appear to be effective against these variants, said Hatziioannou, who published a study on the subject.

But these variants are likely to make targeted drugs such as monoclonal antibodies less effective. They will continue to change and eventually will evade vaccines and diagnostic tests if they keep spreading, she said.

Now is the time, she and others said, to double-down on precautions, to avoid a deadly fourth wave and finally bring the virus under control. 

“The best way to mitigate the threat of the strains is to control the virus,” Borio said. And the best way to control the virus is through the public health tools we have,” like mask-wearing, hand-washing, avoiding crowds, and vaccination.

Next few months a ‘very murky picture’

It’s difficult to predict what the virus will do over the next few months, said Samuel Scarpino, who conducts infectious disease forecasting at Northeastern University in Boston.

The variants make estimates more difficult, he said, as do the rising rate of vaccination, the relaxation of some COVID-19 public health measures, the lack of demographic information on who’s getting vaccinated and the limited genetic surveillance, which makes it harder to know exactly what the variants are doing.

“All those meet together to make it a very murky picture over the next few months,” he said. 

Under the Biden administration, officials are increasing gene sequencing of virus samples tenfold, hoping to better track the variants.

In the short term, this awareness is likely to increase anxiety, prompting endless discussions about increases in variants and worries about what effect the changes might have.

More extensive sequencing should give the United States a better sense of where the variants are, how fast they spread and what to do about them, said Gigi Gronvall, a senior scholar and associate professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. 

Viruses mutate as they reproduce within a person. Some mutations do nothing for the virus, and others lead to its demise.

A few improve the virus’s ability to reproduce and get rapidly passed through a population.

“This is what viruses do,” said Gronvall, an immunologist.

Public health officials predicted that but haven’t been able to convince leaders or the public to change the trajectory of the pandemic. “It is so disappointing because it didn’t have to be this way,” she said.

She and others said that if people give the virus an opportunity, it will take it.

Double-down on stopping spread

Legislatures in North Dakota, Iowa and Wisconsin rolled back mask requirements. (Wisconsin’s governor reinstated them, but the legislature promised to remove them again when it meets next week.)

Gawande said people should wear medical-grade masks instead of often-ill-fitting homemade ones, and he criticized decisions by state legislators to lift requirements.

“The mask mandate is the last thing you remove, not the first when your hospitalizations go down,” he said.

Other states eased restrictions.

“It’s just ridiculous,” Hatziioannou said about allowing restaurants to open for Valentine’s Day. COVID-19 cases spiked after every major holiday over the past year. Why would Valentine’s Day be any different, she asked.

Lifting the restrictions sends the signal that if it’s OK to eat at a restaurant, it must be OK to eat at grandma’s house, she said, but neither is safe.

Slightly easing regulations – allowing restaurants to be 40% full instead of 25% – won’t change the nation’s quality of life, Scarpino said.

A fourth wave would be far less likely, he said, if people get vaccinated when they become eligible and carefully follow public health measures such as mask-wearing and avoiding crowds. 

“Then,” he said, “we can imagine a scenario in which this is all behind us.”

There’s a chance to end the outbreak in the U.S., Scarpino said, if people double-down.

If restrictions are lifted too early, the virus will bounce back. Vaccines offer a way out of that scenario but only if people take them and can get them in time to prevent a fourth wave, Scarpino and others said.

Thomas Balcezak, chief medical officer of Yale New Haven Health in Connecticut, views the virus like a forest fire and every tree/person as potential fuel for the flames. “Every time you vaccinate someone, you remove that potential fuel,” he said. “If you vaccinate enough people, you can create a fire break, where there just isn’t any more fuel for that fire.”

The faster the population is vaccinated, “the faster we can reduce the possibility of new strains emerging,” he said. “This has been a marathon, and now it’s kind of a race to the finish.”

Eric Topol, founder and director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute in California, said coping with the variants could be the last major challenge of the pandemic.

“If we get through this intact, we’re looking good, unless a new freak of nature comes up,” he said. “We’ve got this if we can get through this potential onslaught. But (the virus) needs to be fully respected.”

And by the way, if you want to stop the spread, it’s may be important to take this into consideration:

As U.S. authorities debate whether to keep schools open, a consensus is emerging in Europe that children are a considerable factor in the spread of Covid-19—and more countries are shutting schools for the first time since the spring.

Closures have been announced recently in the U.K., Germany, Ireland, Austria, Denmark and the Netherlands on concerns about a more infectious variant of the virus first detected in the U.K. and rising case counts despite lockdowns.

While the debate continues, recent studies and outbreaks show that schoolchildren, even younger ones, can play a significant role in spreading infections.

“In the second wave we acquired much more evidence that schoolchildren are almost equally, if not more infected by SARS-CoV-2 than others,“ said Antoine Flahault, director of the University of Geneva’s Institute of Global Health.

Not being a scientist, I don’t know if that’s true. But I will say that this pandemic has so far unfolded in certain predictable ways in which Europe seems to be hit with new effects weeks and months before they hit here. I don’t know if that will be the way it works here, but it’s just common sense that these variants are going to mix things up in ways we should be prepared for.

All the scientists and the Biden administration are telling us that we can’t let our guard down. But it sure looks like we’re doing it. Again.

Normalizing MAGA in new and creative ways

TPM:

If Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is any indication, the Republican Party is far from purging itself of former President Donald Trump, and may even be emboldened in its praise of the ex-president after he was acquitted on Saturday of inciting an insurrection of the U.S. Capitol.

“We don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of taking back the majority without Donald Trump,” Graham said during a Fox interview on Tuesday night. “If you don’t get that, you’re just not looking. He was a hell of a president on all of the things that conservatives really believe in, it was a consequential presidency.” 

The adulation for the former president comes days after the Trump was acquitted by the Senate of a charge that he had incited the mob who stormed the Capitol last month…

Graham conceded on Tuesday that while McConnell was “indispensable” to Trump as far as pushing conservative judges into courts and advancing a major tax cut through a narrow GOP majority, Trump remains “the most dominant figure in the Republican Party.”

“I’m sorry what happened on January 6th. He will get his fair share of blame,” Graham said of Trump in a brief mention of the riot. “But to my Republican colleagues in the Senate, let’s try to work together — realize that without President Trump, we are never going to get back into the majority.” 

“And to President Trump, you are going to have to make some changes for you to reach your potential,” Graham said without elaborating on what those changes might include.

Lol. “Trump is a handful.” I guess that’s one way of putting it. Perhaps a dangerous demagogic, violent, white nationalist is more to the point.

Does anyone, especially Trump, listen to this fool? I guess portraying himself as the peacemaker between the rump GOP establishment and Dear Leader makes him “relevant.” Maybe it does. That makes him more pathetic.

And it’s not benign. It has the effect of continuing the normalization of Trump even after his obscene performance in the election aftermath. It’s just politics, Graham says, no big deal. Republicans need Trump so it’s fine. And sure, Trump has to “make some changes” which is hysterical since Trump doesn’t change. Ever. But Graham knows that.

Basically, he’s just out there insisting that Trump’s massive failure of a presidency was actually a huge success because he held the pen that nominated judges chosen by the Federalist Society and signed a tax cut bill passed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell. He literally did nothing else even they can consider positive and the wrecking ball he took to foreign policy and national security along with the grotesque performance with the pandemic make him the worst president in history by any measure. I guess you can call that “consequential” but it isn’t something I’d be proud to embrace.

This reminds me of another of the so-called reasonable mavericks, Dan Crenshaw, R-Tx. He made his reputation as a “normie” Republican when he went on Saturday Night Live to graciously receive an apology from Pete Davidson who had insulted him on the show. We all gave him plaudits for being a decent person since that’s so unusual in today’s GOP. But Crenshaw is yet another of these Lindsey Graham phonies.

Today, Charlie Sykes exposes Crenshaw as the shameless hypocrite he is and Bill Kristol (!) tweeted this:

(No, I have no idea what’s going on with Bill Kristol but … whatever.) Anyway, I don’t think he’s exactly right there. What Crenshaw (and Graham) are doing is is something different than just having it both ways. They are also further normalizing this shameless dissonance into normal political discourse. Crenshaw and Graham aren’t just throwing the red meat to the MAGAs on Newsmax and Parler and then going on CNN and sounding reasonable. They are doing both things in the same media, running the messages together, and mixing the MAGA lunacy with reason in such a way that it starts to meld into mainstream discourse.

Trump mainstreamed MAGA, ofcourse. He was right out in the open. But nobody ever pegged him as some kind of savvy operator who was just doing politics, as Graham is trying to present himself today. Neither did anyone ever think that Trump was a reasonable guy underneath it all who just said some crazy stuff to appease the base as Crenshaw is doing. This is a form of mainstreaming in which keeping the rabid MAGA’s riled up is just smart politics while you reassure the suburban women that you really don’t mean it.

Mitch McConnell has more or less done this all along, of course, in order to get his tax cuts and judges which was all he figured he’d be able to do with Trump. But his recent behavior suggests that he thinks the party needs a dramatic split from the Trumpists to drain the infection and compete in the future. These other guys are trying to finesse the split.

I kind of doubt any of them are going to be successful. It’s still all about Trump. We’ll soon see if he still has that pull on his cult and if he does, these people will all still be at his mercy. If it fades, those who took such a public role in defending him or trying to walk the fine line will not be the ones who profit.

The day the maga died

https://twitter.com/MDockey17/status/1362042410335928323?s=20

MAGA didn’t really die, sadly, just Rush Limbaugh did.

That was just Trump’s former Atlantic City Casino imploding.

Rush Limbaugh is dead

I won’t say rest in peace because I don’t think he will. He was a malevolent force in American culture for over 30 years and is one of those most responsible for turning the Republican Party into a neo-fascist cult. His fans even called themselves Dittoheads which says everything.

I have written reams of stuff about LImbaugh on this blog over the years. Here’s one from 2006 that I think accurately reflects what he did to us:

Is the culture growing more coarse? Check. Cruel? check. Nihilisitic? check.Racist? check. Xenophobic? check. Consumption worshipping? check. Sexist? check. Rage filled? check. Hmmmm. I wonder why?

LIMBAUGH: Exactly my point! This is no different than what happens at the skull and bones initiation and we’re going to ruin people’s lives over it and we’re going to hamper our military effort, and then we are going to really hammer them because they had a good time. You know, these people are being fired at every day. I’m talking about people having a good time, these people, you ever heard of emotional release? You of heard of need to blow some steam off?”

This is a very revealing portrait of what’s happening in America and it explains some things about why the right is so successful. And it’s the opposite of what everybody says it is. It isn’t because they’ve become more moral and religious. It’s because they’ve fostered and exploited extremism, nihilism and cruelty. After all, if it was the libertine culture of “Brokeback Mountain” or “unwed motherhood” or (gasp) abortion that was creating this shift, you’d think we would have benefitted, not them. For all their crowing about traditional values, it’s the right that has embraced decadence, sadism, vice and corruption.

Yes, it’s a trend. It started years ago when the feminist movement decided that their best friends were going to be German shepherds. You know. So that’s — well, it’s true. You go to the right airports and you can see it.

I have little doubt that most of the people who listen to Rush also believe that they are good practicing Christian conservatives. And many Christian conservatives probably don’t listen to him. But they listen to Pat Robertson:

You know, I don’t know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war

And this:

How about group marriage? Or marriage between daddies and little girls? Or marriage between a man and his donkey? Anything allegedly linked to civil rights will be doable, and the legal underpinnings for marriage will have been destroyed.” Now, that’s more or less a prophecy. Not a divine prophecy, but a prediction.

Notice how Limbaugh and the preachers pander to the depraved imagination? It’s not religious values these people are selling. They are selling a brutal, domineering, degenerate culture, making their listeners and viewers wallow in it, plumbing the depths of the subconscious, drawing forth Goyaesque images of bestiality and violence and death. That’s a feature of some religions, to be sure, but it’s not the nice upright Christian morality everybody’s pretending it is.

If the culture is careening into a crude, dog-eat-dog corrupt “Pottersville” it’s because the greedheads and the juvenile authoritarian thugs, whether in talk radio or K Street, have taken it over. And it is hard for liberals to counter this because our bedrock values include tolerance, free expression and personal autonomy and that enables this decadent turn in many ways. But let’s make no mistake, it is only on the right that purveyors of brutal, sadistic, depraved political discourse are welcomed into the houses, offices and beds of the nation’s political leadership.

I’m not sure what the answer to this is, but I know that this is where the real political problem for Democrats lies. So, perhaps we can stop bullshitting ourselves that we can solve this problem by speaking in rightwing approved religious language and pulling our punches on abortion. That is not the real reason the right is winning and we won’t win that way either. Religion is cover for these people. Rush Limbaugh is the guiding spirit of the Republican Party.

LIMBAUGH: And these American prisoners of war — have you people noticed who the torturers are? Women! The babes! The babes are meting out the torture…You know, if you look at — if you, really, if you look at these pictures, I mean, I don’t know if it’s just me, but it looks just like anything you’d see Madonna, or Britney Spears do on stage. Maybe I’m — yeah. And get an NEA grant for something like this. I mean, this is something that you can see on stage at Lincoln Center from an NEA grant, maybe on Sex in the City — the movie. I mean, I don’t — it’s just me.

When Limbaugh came under fire for those vulgar comments, the leading lights of the Republican party quickly came to his defense.

Rush’s angry, frustrated critics discount how hard it is to make an outrageous charge against him stick. But, we listeners have spent years with him, we know him, and trust him. Rush is one of those rare acquaintances who can be defended against an assault challenging his character without ever knowing the “facts.” We trust his good judgment, his unerring decency, and his fierce loyalty to the country he loves and to the courageous young Americans who defend her. For millions of us, David Brock is firing blanks against a bulletproof target. — Kate O’Beirne Washington Editor for National Review.

Figure out how to deal with that and we might be able to make some headway.

We didn’t figure it out.

The good news is that the hate radio he popularized is dying. The bad news is that it’s been replaced with digital and online propaganda. And, of course, they still have cable news. His spirit will live on. Unfortunately.

The Republican creed

A Texas mayor spells it out:

He resigned. But he was just keeping it real. That’s how they think.

Oh, by the way, he’s a big Christian. Obviously not a big admirer of the Jesus message, however.

When they show you who they are….

Republicans told us who they are, Charlie Sykes wrote Monday. “Mad respect for the seven GOP senators who voted to convict Donald Trump,” he wrote, but they do not represent the party anymore (emphasis in original):

Let’s run the numbers from the last few weeks:

  • The number of Republicans who backed the Texas lawsuit to overturn the presidential election: 126;
  • The number of Republicans who voted against certifying the electoral votes of Pennsylvania: 138;
  • The number of Republicans who voted to protect conspiracy theorist/bigot Marjorie Taylor Greene’s committee assignments: 199;
  • The number of House Republicans who voted against impeachment: 197;
  • And then Saturday’s vote. Overall the pro-Trump GOP vote (in the House and Senate): 240-17.

This is Donald Trump’s party. But worse.

Over the last five years, Republicans have shown willingness to accept — or least ignore — lies, racism, and xenophobia.

But now it is a party that is also willing to acquiesce to sedition, violence, extremism, and anti-democratic authoritarianism.

Maybe there is still hope for some. A lightbulb coming on, a “come to Jefferson” moment, a glance in a mirror and seeing Dorian Gray’s alter image staring back. But I’m too scarred to hope for it.

Facebook Brain

No one is immune.

Sara Robinson (Orcinus, AlterNet, HuffPost) summarizes this David Roth essay now a couple of weeks old: “The Performativity Is The Point.” To wit, “For too many on the right (and on the left as well), acting out grievance has become the only viable way of life.” Her comment appeared on Facebook. The irony of that will be clear in a moment.

Roth provides a thumbnail history of recent American “kooks” using National League Cy Young Award-winner Steve Carlton as an example. Over the course of his career, Carlton entered The Big Silence. He stopped talking to the press. Good thing. Carlton off the mound was what might be called quirky, a nice way of saying that when he did talk he could say some mighty conspiratorial, racist, and anti-Semitic stuff.

Carlton eventually retired to Durango, Colorado in 1989 where Philadelphia Magazine reported in 1994 he was “doing yoga and hoarding guns and preparing for The Revolution in whatever Red Dawn–ish guise it might arrive.” But at least he was quiet about it.

He was, Roth says, an early adopter of what might be called Facebook Brain. A feature of this is not the careful picking and choosing of what conspiratorial dreck to believe. True believers accept it all. A couple of decades later Facebook arrived to provide the all. Plus, a means for the faithful to perform their beliefs in public.

Roth writes:

In a society that signals, in a million brutally overt ways, that your life does not really count for very much, it is easy in the abstract to see the appeal of being able to opt into something a little more significant—to be a leader, a rescuer, a hero or a star or just a soldier on the winning side. 

Enter Donald Trump:

Here is the synchronicity that binds old-fashioned American kookery’s longstanding suspicions and signature fantasies to the person Donald Trump, and which sent them charging into the Capitol last month ready to commit murder in his service, and which has them still standing back and standing by to advance a fantastical and self-invented agenda of retribution and exterminative violence. Trump’s inexcusable celebrity and singularly rancid self are the irritant around which this weird pearl has formed, but the process was perfectly natural.

Without social media, Trump himself is a spent force, just another podgy golf asshole griping in a country club. But also he is airborne, now.

He is alive in all the Americans who are not just blinkered and baffled and vain enough to consider wearing a mask into a supermarket somehow the same thing as dying in the Holocaust, but who also believe that their confrontations with the tyranny of The Door Guy At Trader Joe’s must be streamed someplace where people can throw it some hearts, or likes, or fuming devil faces, or money. Social media is bad for people like this in the ways that it’s bad for everyone, but there is no more intoxicating or deranging a gift for a person who is already like this than something that looks and feels so much like a megaphone.

This reminds me of the tag-team, street corner preachers I saw in Greenville, SC in the 1970s. White males, of course. Any derision they received from annoyed passersby they viewed as another jewel in the heavenly crowns Jesus himself would place on their regulation crew-cutted heads in heaven.

The politics these people profess is not about helping anyone, lord knows, or really about any kind of ideological program at all. It is about an obsessive and even loving taxonomy of and fixation upon enemies and problems, and the way it works is through relentlessness, and through a refusal to ever stop performing weird arias of anger and umbrage. The terrified and fuming derangement that conservative media sought to embed in its consumers, mostly to keep them pliable and on the hook through the commercial breaks, has blossomed into this: a rising army of impossibly unhappy people, their ambitions both vague and vast, who have come to understand that the dizzy righteousness of that derangement is the point.

Post by post and provocation by provocation, it is absolutely as stupid and ridiculous as it looks. But whether it’s out of some curdled honor or sincere belief, the more important point is that they would absolutely kill to keep it all going, because they cannot imagine any way of being outside of it. For all the wild talk of vengeance and violence and humiliation, the fantasy catharsis of firing squads and military tribunals and the rope, there’s nothing they truly want on the other side of those lurid resolutions. They need to feel like this all the time, because they can’t imagine another way to feel. This is the last and most meaningful tenet of this vain and annihilating and wildly metastatic politics: It just can’t stop.

Because grievance is an addiction. They’ve been taught to see themselves as victims and to act out that grievance, sometimes violently, but regularly. As toxic as that is, performing grievance is what one does these days.

Robinson notes briefly that the left is not immune. We are just likely to perform our grievance in different ways. The ritual Democrats-are-weak narrative after the impeachment vote is by now as reflexive as performative. And self-destructive. It reinforces the right’s narrative about the left as unfit to lead.

Purveyors of “they caved” grouse that Democrats in Congress were unwilling to go Conan on Republicans. That is, to put exacting retribution before accomplishing the mission Americans needing help sent Democrats there for: to help them. But performing “crush your enemies,” etc., would also reinforce for many voters that “both sides” are more interested in fighting each other than fighting for voters. For a significant portion of the electorate, that is how we ended up with Donald Trump in the first place.

It is easy to understand the impulse. Grievance is in the air. On the air in the broadcast sense, and everywhere on social media. Performing it earns likes and hits and guest appearances on cable news.

Still, that Nietzsche guy’s admonition is worth keeping in mind: “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”