Skip to content

Month: February 2021

Well and truly over being shocked

The estate of Claude Rains should get residuals every time we are “shocked, shocked” again at how not shocked we are:

The Trump Organization never consummated the deal reported by BuzzFeed News, but with Trump still in office, the discussions alone “raise legal concerns with regards to anti-bribery laws,” the site reports:

Talks between members of Trump’s campaign and Parler about Trump’s potential involvement began last summer, and were revisited in November by the Trump Organization after Trump lost the 2020 election to the Democratic nominee and current president, Joe Biden. Documents seen by BuzzFeed News show that Parler offered the Trump Organization a 40% stake in the company. It is unclear as to what extent the former president was involved with the discussions.

Does Trump ever not involve himself in any family business deals?

And no one needs reminding that Trump did not get the boot from Twitter and Facebook until after the Jan. 6 insurrection, months after these negotiations began.

Parler shareholderJeffrey Wernick claims inaccuracies in BuzzFeed’s reporting, “but did not provide specifics on what, if anything, was inaccurate.”

Four sources told BuzzFeed News that [former Trump campaign manager Brad] Parscale and Trump campaign lawyer Alex Cannon met with Parler CEO John Matze and shareholders Dan Bongino and Jeffrey Wernick at Trump’s Florida club Mar-a-Lago in June 2020 to discuss the idea. But the White House counsel’s office soon put a stop to the talks, one person with knowledge of the discussions said, ruling that such a deal while Trump was president would violate ethics rules.

“The president was never part of the discussions,” Parscale told BuzzFeed News. “The discussions were never that substantive. And this was just one of many things the campaign was looking into to deal with the cancel culture of Silicon Valley.”

Uh-huh.

UPDATE: Too good not to add.

Pandemic fatigue

Something snapped Friday afternoon. It is three weeks short of a year in isolation. Grocery shopping once every two weeks. Mondays. At sunup. Masked. After a Christmas warning of a coming case spike by a TV doctor, safety glasses now. Take-out once or twice a week from neighborhood restaurants we hope to keep afloat for better times.

Another Friday night unable to meet friends out for food and a couple of beers brought to mind a Supremes song I had not thought of for a very long time. Clearly, the pandemic is taking a toll.

https://youtu.be/ixEOMB6jyEE

There are days when following cable news becomes unsustainable. Right now I’m binging “The Expanse” late into the evening. It spawns thoughts connected to the news anyway.

Two hundred years in the future, humans encounter an alien “protomolecule,” an engineered artifact of a civilization dead for a couple of billion years. It is intent on following its ancient programming to build something from energy and whatever materials it encounters, living or inert. Humans being humans, they want either to turn it into a weapon or destroy it because they perceive it as a weapon. But Earth was at the stage of single-celled life at the time of the Ring Builders‘ demise and the protomolecule’s creation. What humans cannot fathom is its indifference to them.

Technology is like that even in the present. It wants what it wants. It does what it is programmed to do. People are incidental or else simply pollinators. One does not need a starship to find new life forms. Like the protomolecule’s creators we invented corporations: artificial persons conceived in law and born on paper, programmed to create profit from whatever is at hand, living or inert, and ultimately indifferent to both.

For contemporary example, the New York Times examines leaked cell phone location data:

In 2019, a source came to us with a digital file containing the precise locations of more than 12 million individual smartphones for several months in 2016 and 2017. The data is supposed to be anonymous, but it isn’t. We found celebrities, Pentagon officials and average Americans.

It became clear that this data — collected by smartphone apps and then fed into a dizzyingly complex digital advertising ecosystem — was a liability to national security, to free assembly and to citizens living mundane lives. It provided an intimate record of people whether they were visiting drug treatment centers, strip clubs, casinos, abortion clinics or places of worship.

Another anonymous source provided more recent location data related to the Jan. 6 insurrection:

The data we were given showed what some in the tech industry might call a God-view vantage of that dark day. It included about 100,000 location pings for thousands of smartphones, revealing around 130 devices inside the Capitol exactly when Trump supporters were storming the building. Times Opinion is only publishing the names of people who gave their permission to be quoted in this article.

About 40 percent of the phones tracked near the rally stage on the National Mall during the speeches were also found in and around the Capitol during the siege — a clear link between those who’d listened to the president and his allies and then marched on the building.

While there were no names or phone numbers in the data, we were once again able to connect dozens of devices to their owners, tying anonymous locations back to names, home addresses, social networks and phone numbers of people in attendance. In one instance, three members of a single family were tracked in the data.

The source shared this information, in part, because the individual was outraged by the events of Jan. 6. The source wanted answers, accountability, justice. The person was also deeply concerned about the privacy implications of this surreptitious data collection. Not just that it happens, but also that most consumers don’t know it is being collected and it is insecure and vulnerable to law enforcement as well as bad actors — or an online mob — who might use it to inflict harm on innocent people. (The source asked to remain anonymous because the person was not authorized to share the data and could face severe penalties for doing so.)

The technology wants what it wants. It does what it is programmed to do. Humans (some, anyway) are its beneficiaries, but also its raw material.

Michelle Goldberg considers the QAnon conspiracy’s obsession with Hillary Clinton. “Frazzledrip.” Vince Foster. The Clinton body count. “QAnon is the obscene apotheosis of three decades of Clinton demonization,” Goldberg writes. There is ancient misogynist hatred involved, and of Jews of course.

Clinton commented on QAnon-fan Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and the phenomenon of Clinton’s own demonization:

“We are facing a mass addiction with the effective purveying of disinformation on social media,” Clinton said. “I don’t have one iota of sympathy for someone like her, but the algorithms, we are now understanding more than ever we could have, truly are addictive. And whatever it is in our brains for people who go down those rabbit holes, and begin to inhabit this alternative reality, they are, in effect, made to believe.”

Clinton now thinks that the creation and promotion of this alternative reality, enabled and incentivized by the tech platforms, is, as she put it, “the primary event of our time.” Nothing about QAnon or Marjorie Taylor Greene is entirely new. Social media has just taken the dysfunction that was already in our politics, and rendered it uglier than anyone ever imagined.

It wants what it wants. It does what it is programmed to do. And it is indifferent to us.

Friday Night Soother

Just some cute stuff this week:

Risky Business

Oh look. Trump’s allies are a teensy bit worried that the impeachment trial might make some of their voters wonder if maybe they’ve been lied to:

The ex-president’s boosters fear major reputational damage if next week’s hearings focus on the violence of Jan. 6 and not narrow questions about the Constitution.

Allies of former President Donald Trump are imploring his impeachment team to avoid one specific topic when they defend the ex-president at his Senate trial next week: the deadly riot that unfolded at the U.S. Capitol.

Despite Trump’s likely acquittal on charges that he incited an insurrection, some of his most ardent supporters fear the trial could further damage his reputation if his attorneys wade into the events of Jan. 6, when five people were killed — including a Capitol police officer — after pro-Trump demonstrators stormed the halls of Congress.

The former president, whom House Democrats have accused of inciting the rioters at a rally earlier the same day, is already hemorrhaging support within the GOP. Recent public polls have shown a sharp decline in support among Republican voters for a potential Trump comeback bid in 2024.And a widely televised trial that reminds voters and lawmakers of the disturbing moments when MAGA devotees assaulted law enforcement officials and broke into the Capitol building could harm his future political aspirations even more.

“The Democrats have a very emotional and compelling case,” said former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon. “They’re going to try to convict him in the eyes of the American people and smear him forever.”

Trump’s legal team appears to have similar trepidations that next week’s proceedings will turn into a high-profile retelling of the riots and his role in them. To prevent that from happening, his lawyers have centered their case on whether it is constitutional to impeach a president after he’s left office. They also plan to argue that he did not engage in insurrection, saying his fiery speech on the ellipse of the White House was protected by the First Amendment, without indulging a lengthy discussion about what happened on Jan. 6.

“We don’t need to focus on Jan. 6 because this is unconstitutional,” said a person familiar with the strategy, who was not authorized to speak publicly. “There’s a lot of legal technical arguments that are going to be discussed.”

The concern among Trump’s allies that the trial will be a relitigation of the events at the Capitol underscores the degree to which next week is being viewed as a public relations matter for the optics-obsessed former president. It was notable on Thursday that in a letter dismissing the House impeachment managers’ calls for Trump to testify at the trial, the ex-president’s lawyers decried the request as a “public relations stunt.”

Still, there is little Trump’s team can do to stop the trial from veering towards a discussion of Jan. 6, since the impeachment managers are likely to focus intensely on the riots — and could, indeed, call witnesses to testify about what happened. In advance of that happening, top Republicans have begun to warn that Democrats are trying to score political points rather than address substantive constitutional matters.

“I think we all know what happened there, and I think that was reckless,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said of Trump’s speech and riots that occurred after. “But I think the Democrats are wanting to make a statement rather than to provide a fair process by which this could actually be considered in a constitutional way.”

People familiar with Trump’s strategy say his defense attorneys David Schoen and Bruce Castor hope to keep the trial “short and sweet” — not wanting to entangle themselves in a lengthy debate over whether their client’s comments at the “Stop the Steal” rally outside the White House qualify as inciting speech, or legitimize the prosecution’s arguments by focusing on Jan. 6. Instead, they plan to keep their defense narrowly tailored to the question of constitutionality.

Basically they think the smart move is to offer no defense at all and just rely on the process argument to get the whole thing over with quickly. I suppose that makes sense but it doesn’t get them off the hook by any means. The Democrats are going to present a case, with vivid evidence that will be seen by the real jurors — the voters — whether Trump defends himself or not. They might want to consider whether that case should go unanswered.

Meanwhile, Trump has some others in his ear telling him to get down and dirty:

“He is not going to be convicted, so we must address Nov. 3. And the best place to adjudicate this is the well of the U.S. Senate,” said Bannon. “It has to be dramatic, it has to be big. It has to be the big lie versus the big steal.”

Trump, whose own interest in resurfacing claims of a stolen election led to the abrupt departure of his original defense team last week, is not currently expected to take on a public-facing role in his impeachment trial — meaning that any mention of election fraud will be left to his attorneys to include or omit.

At the moment, his lawyers are saying they plan to argue the “constitutional” case but also says it will be “exciting.” We’ll have to see where they go. The Senators are pretty much a lost cause but no matter what they do, the evidence will be there, it will be on the record and the people will know exactly what happened. Donald Trump is guilty as charged, he incited an insurrection, and they aren’t even trying to defend that.

The question, of course, is how many people will see it and how many will watch the Sean Hannity fantasy version. But it will be there if they want it.

.

Let’s talk about Lauren

Lauren Boebert, Republican Candidate for Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District, speaks during a get-out-the-vote-rally at the Grand Junction Motor Speedway in Grand Junction, Colo., Monday, Nov. 2, 2020. The event was hosted by the Mesa County GOP and was also attended by Senator Cory Gardner. Photo by Barton Glasser

Marjorie Taylor Greene is getting all the attention this week, mostly because she’s said her political enemies should be executed.She’s now a right wing heroine and will no doubt be feted and petted at all the fringe dwelling events around the country. There is no conspiracy theory she hasn’t flogged as a wingnut “influencer” these past couple of years. But she’s also a QAnon believer even if she’s lying about it.

But what about Lauren Boebert? This seems to me to be a very forthright endorsement of QAnon:

Also:

Boebert made headlines last year when she traveled to an event Beto O’Rourke, then a Democratic presidential candidate, was holding and challenged his proposed gun buyback program.

“I was one of the gun-owning Americans who heard you speak regarding your ‘Hell yes, I’m going to take your AR-15s and AK-47s.’ Well, I’m here to say, ‘Hell no you’re not,'” she declared.

She made headlines again in May by violating state coronavirus guidelines and reopening her restaurant, Shooters Grill.

They are all conspiracy mongering trolls. Nothing more. And frankly, I doubt these people even believe half the stuff they are passing on to their followers. They are just chasing fame and whatever comes with it. And they’re good at it. Donald Trump showed the way: be an ignorant, raving, narcissistic, bully and you can go far in Republican politics.

By the way, Boebert was tweeting 1776 on January 6th and letting her people know they wouldn’t find Nancy Pelosi on the Senate floor. She claimed the people assaulting the Capitol were her constituents. She insisted that she needed to be armed at all times. She is just as much of a menace as Greene.

He’s not budging

There has been a lot of talk about this Larry Summers op-ed advising the Biden administration to make the COVID relief program smaller and there was an initial impression that the White House was listening.

They are not. They sent out Jared Bernstein to throw cold water on it and then former Summers associate Gene Sperling went out to do the same thing.

Then Biden weighed in:

Biden: “A lot of folks are losing hope … So I’m going to act and I’m going to act fast. I would like to be doing it with the support of Republicans … but they’re just not willing to go as far as we have to go.”

“There is simply nothing more important than us getting the resources we need to vaccine the people in this country. As soon, as quickly as possible.” — Biden

Biden: “So the way I see it is the biggest risk is not going too big, it’s if we go too small … all of the sudden, many [Republicans] have rediscovered fiscal restraint.”

Originally tweeted by Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) on February 5, 2021.

As Ryan Grim pointed out in the Intercept, they seem to have learned the lesson of 2009. That’s a good thing since the lesson of 2009 is to eschew the weirdos preaching austerity in a time of crisis and follow standard Keynesian economics. Huzzah.

Space Farce

Aaron Rupar does some analysis of a mini-brouhaha that happened earlier this week regarding the silly Space Force that illustrates the hermetically sealed right wing bubble’s total reliance on outrage and grievance to feed their rabid base:

White House press secretary Jen Psaki’s dismissive comments about the Space Force earlier this week highlighted how thirsty conservatives are for outrage fuel. But it also illustrated a challenge the Biden administration faces as it tries to reckon with former President Donald Trump’s legacy.

Psaki was asked Tuesday by Bloomberg White House reporter Josh Wingrove if Biden has made a decision about “keeping, or keeping the scope of, Space Force.” Psaki responded as though she’d been asked about the happy hour specials at the Trump International Hotel.

“Wow, Space Force. It’s the plane of today,” Psaki sarcastically said, referring to silly questions she fielded during her first press briefings about Biden’s thoughts on the color scheme of Air Force One. “I am happy to check with our Space Force point of contact. I’m not sure who that is. I will find out and see if we have any update on that.”

Trump administration press briefings were more akin to professional wrestling matches than they were good-faith attempts to share information with the American public. So as tame as it is compared to Sarah Sanders using a manipulated video to demean Jim Acosta or Sean Spicer declaring war on sense perception itself, Psaki’s exchange with Wingrove is about as controversial as Biden-era briefings have gotten thus far.

On one hand, Psaki’s dismissiveness is understandable. As Defense News recently explained, the Space Force “is fundamentally a rebranding of the Air Force’s legacy space organizations — specifically the now-defunct Air Force Space Command.” Trump pushed for its establishment mainly as a marketing and fundraising opportunity for his campaign. Even before the Space Force was officially inaugurated in late 2019, the Trump campaign sold Space Force merchandise on its website, and administration officials were photographed wearing the swag.

It was also a big hit at Trump rallies, where Trump touted it as evidence of how he was rebuilding the military while his fans chanted, “Space Force! Space Force!

Space Force’s tacky, sci-fi-style branding — including referring to personnel as “Guardians” — has made it an object of ridicule among celebrities like Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn and Mark Hamill, who’s perhaps best known as Luke Skywalker in the Star Wars films.

But Space Force is more than just the Trump Steaks of the military. Though Trump pushed for its approval, it’s an independent branch of the armed forces that was created through congressional action. It has a budget of more than $15 billion that it uses to operate military and GPS satellites, track space debris, and plan for potential space military operations, among other things. That’s important work.

So, unsurprisingly, conservative pundits quickly seized on Psaki’s comments during Tuesday’s briefings, accusing her of disrespecting the troops (even though no “Guardians” have died in the line of duty).

Republican members of Congress also got in on the act. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL), the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, told Politico “it’s concerning to see the Biden administration’s press secretary blatantly diminish an entire branch of our military as the punchline of a joke, which I’m sure China would find funny,” and demanded Psaki “apologize to the men and women of the Space Force for this disgraceful comment.”

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), who encouraged the January 6 insurrection that led to the death of a police officer, shamelessly tweeted of Psaki’s comments, “The level of disrespect they have for those who serve is disgraceful.” A number of other elected Republicans weighed in with similar statements, and Fox News indulged in some performative outrage, too.

Amid all this, Psaki posted a tweet Tuesday evening that read as a bit of a Rorschach test. While she seemed to commit the Biden administration to the Space Force, she did so with a touch of shade, inviting “members of the team to come visit us in the briefing room anytime to share an update on their important work.”

Vox reached out to the Space Force press office and asked if it plans to take Psaki up on her offer, but hadn’t received a response as of publish time. Meanwhile, on Wednesday, Psaki clarified in response to a question from a Fox News reporter that Space Force “has the full support of the Biden administration.” She hasn’t caved to demands that she apologize for her remarks.

Rupar concludes with this:

… Biden has little choice but to learn to live with the Space Force. Disbanding it would take an act of Congress, and Biden has made it clear that he intends to spend his political capital on more pressing things.

That’s really unfortunate. “Space Force” is childish. It was unnecessary — we had the Air Force Space Command and NASA which was all that was necessary for any kind of space policy. Trump is a cartoon character who created a cartoon military branch that will suck up even more money for nothing.

The last thing we needed was another branch of the military.

Pushing the Big Lie

Following up on my post below, check out this latest from OAN. The only reason they put up this disclaimer is that they’ve been put on notice by the voting machine companies that if they don’t they will be sued. I’m not sure it’s going to be adequate. They are broadcasting something they know is a lie.

MyPillow guy Mike Lindell’s big lie special on OAN begins with an epic disclaimer

seems legit!

Mike Lindell's "Absolute Proof" special is basically just the same bonkers conspiracy theories about the election he's been pushing for three months.

i mean this is basically an SNL skit come to life

Originally tweeted by Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) on February 5, 2021.

I don’t even know what to say.

Nothing left but the cult

There’s a lot going on in politics right now, but I think we can pretty much declare that this particular week belonged to Marjorie Taylor Greene and her history of sharing unhinged conspiracy theories on social media. It seems as though every day someone unearths another example of her obnoxious rants.

The Republicans held a right-wing encounter session on Wednesday night at which they gave Greene a standing ovation even as 147 of them voted —by secret ballot — to allow Liz Cheney to keep her leadership position after she voted to impeach Donald Trump. The next day, all but 11 stepped forward to show their fealty to Trump and his favorite new henchwoman Greene, by voting to allow her to keep her committee assignments even as the Democrats did their dirty work for them by voting to strip her of them.

House Republicans are running in circles trying desperately to keep the QAnon/Trump faction from exploding at them while also keeping some semblance of deniability if this whole thing goes sideways and they need to deny they are in thrall to the crazies when the next election rolls around. They do have to dial for dollars from big donors and appeal to at least a few informed voters who think this whole thing is nuts.

It’s a problem. But when you think about it, it’s really all they know how to do at this point. After all, the party didn’t even put out a platform for the 2020 campaign, so it’s not as if they would have a pressing agenda even if they had won the majority:

WHEREAS, The RNC, had the Platform Committee been able to convene in 2020, would have undoubtedly unanimously agreed to reassert the Party’s strong support for President Donald Trump and his Administration …

There were a couple of bullet points bashing the media as well, but that was it.

The truth is that Republicans didn’t actually have much of an agenda throughout the Trump years either. Other than their massive tax cuts for the wealthy and attempted repeal of Obamacare (both of which they rammed through the reconciliation process), confirming judges to the federal bench and pro-forma budgets with huge hikes in military spending, they mostly let Trump flail around in the White House and keep the country stirred up with his divisive behavior both here and abroad. As a result, Republicans are now the party of conspiracy theories, culture war, and Donald Trump.

Republican officials exist to feed that beast and nothing more. This is where it’s quickly led them:

https://twitter.com/greggnunziata/status/1357475547681546242?s=20

Meanwhile, their propaganda arms in the right-wing media are in a strange new world without Trump. Fox News, in particular, is having a hard time finding its footing. For the first time in two decades, it’s ratings have left them in the number three spot behind CNN and MSNBC with far-right competitors OAN and Newsmax nipping at its heels. Recall that Trump had been sticking the knife in for quite a while, taking to Twitter at the slightest criticism and was particularly furious at anchor Chris Wallace for his moderating at the disastrous first presidential debate. Trump managed to convince his followers that Fox calling Arizona before the other networks somehow cost him the election and the network has been reeling ever since.

One might have thought that such a predicament would lead to a news organization having some kind of self-evaluation about how they got in the position of having to keep spreading lies in order to keep their audience, but Rupert Murdoch is back in the captain’s chair and he seems to be intent upon doubling down on the crazy in order to recapture the audience from the two low rent competitors. So, as we speak, the Fox News, OAN and Newsmax viewers are all being fed a diet of the same right-wing conspiracies, mockery and lies that they got during the Trump years, only this time without the dominating figure of Trump himself who, for all of his grotesque behavior was in fact the president of the United States so covering him, even as sycophants, had at least some relationship to reality.

The Big Lie of the stolen election, in particular, seems to have spun off the right-wing media into a separate political universe where politics, to the extent you can call it that, is nothing more than non-stop grievance.

For example, the story of the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol is one of the most stunning political events in American history. If you tune in to Fox or one of the others, however, this event was just a little blip on the screen, no different than an average street protest, despite the fact that the goal of the violence was to force the Congress to overturn the election resultsAs Salon’s Sophia Tesfaye noted, Fox hosts have now taken to derisively insulting people who experienced the event, like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Katie Porter, as dizzy hysterics, as if the ransacking of the U.S. Capitol was merely a rowdy tailgate party that got a little out of hand. And I don’t doubt their viewers think that’s true because Fox pretty much dropped the story after the first few days. The late Gore Vidal said, “We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing” but this is ridiculous. It just happened four weeks ago.

It will be very interesting to see if they even bother to cover the impeachment trial next week. If they do, you can be sure it will be framed as a partisan stunt, totally without merit. Nonetheless, I’m sure they will find time to denigrate the process and focus their audience toward whatever Democratic villains they choose to target. The Republicans in the Senate, supposedly the body that’s supposed to cool the passions of the polloi, are also captives of this alternate politics, in which governing is almost irrelevant. Most will refuse to convict, some no doubt hoping that America’s amnesia will kick in before their next election.

All of this leaves an opening for the Democrats who are busy with a real agenda and real plan for governing.

While the Republicans fulminate, whine, mock and deride, still wringing their hands over whether Donald Trump and his followers will be mad at them, the government is kicking back into gear and is starting to work again. Democrats are betting that delivering material benefits to the American people after all the trauma of these past few years will benefit them politically. The Republicans have no choice but to bet on their base continuing to live in an alternate universe, fighting phantoms and feeding their grievances. Over the next couple of years, we’re going to see which political vision most Americans really want.

Salon

Low-key success

NC Gov. Roy Cooper at a May 2020 COVID-19 news briefing. (Pool photo)

Democrats can win “if we look for people that exude confidence and trust and a work ethic—I know that sounds trite, but it really is true,” North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper tells The Atlantic. “Trying to convince somebody like that to get into the political arena these days is harder and harder because of what you have to put up with.”

It sounds like bland advice but it works for the understated Cooper, writes Edward-Isaac Dovere. Cooper keeps winning elections in a state not quite ready to turn blue. He is “16–0 in primary and general elections over the past three and a half decades,” Dovere reminds readers:

“I wish there was a secret that I could tell you,” he told me a few weeks ago on a Zoom call from the governor’s mansion. “I’m not sure that there is. If I had the secret, I’d be out there holding seminars.”

“People do tell me that they don’t agree with me quite a bit of [the time], but they think I’m coming at it in the right way,” Cooper adds. “They believe I’m doing what I think is right, and that matters to them.” Cooper’s low-volume pandemic briefings avoided drama or conflicts with the Trump administration.

Even people who were not voting for him thought he is doing a good job, “fighting for the right things and had the right priorities,” said Marshall Cohen, political director of the Democratic Governor’s Association.

I had not considered how the pandemic might add to Democrat’s brand here with a Republican-controlled legislature. But this leaped off the page:

Cooper told me he sees his second term as offering “opportunity in crisis.” He’s long wanted to expand rural broadband; now, with voters relying more on remote learning and telehealth, public support might be on his side. The same goes for expanding workforce training and health-care coverage: With the pandemic leading to significant job losses—and the loss of employer-sponsored insurance coverage—he thinks he has a bigger opening to expand state efforts than he did during his first term.

That is if Republicans will let him. Expanding rural broadband with state support has long been held up by Republicans’ fetish for private-sector solutions and cosiness with corporate donors. Yet it is a constant “want” for rural residents in the reddest parts of this state and probably others.* Moving beyond talk to achieving that would materially improve lives out where voters spurn Democratic candidates. It could improve Democrats’s chances of retaking control of state legislatures.

It’s not sexy for a lot of progressives, but it counts.

*I was on a Zoom call the other night in which rural organizers complained their limited connections meant they had to run audio only.