Skip to content

Month: April 2021

Friday night soother

Just some random cute vids this week:

What a good doggie. 🙂

Update:

Ruff times could be ahead for the Biden family dogs — they’re soon going to be joined at the White House by the family’s cat.

“She’s waiting in the wings,” first lady Jill Biden told NBC’s “TODAY” show co-anchor Craig Melvin of the first feline in an exclusive interview with her and President Joe Biden.

Melvin noted the addition might be especially difficult for the younger of the Biden’s two German shepherds, Major. The rambunctious 3-year-old rescue dog has had some trouble adjusting to life in the White House and has received some additional training after allegedly being involved in a pair of “nipping” incidents earlier this year.

Jill Biden said Major is prepared.

“That was part of his training. They took him into a shelter with cats,” she said. “He did fine.”

I hope they keep an eye on the kitty until he gets used to her…

The president was asked if the cat was his idea. He simply replied, “No.”

Despite her pro-cat position, Jill Biden backed her husband’s contention that Major is a good boy.

“He’s such a sweet lovable dog. He really is,” the first lady said.

Major and the Bidens’ older dog, Champ, are far from the first presidential dogs to have to share 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with a cat. Former President George W. Bush had two dogs, Barney and Miss Beazley, in addition to their cat, India, and former President Bill Clinton had a dog named Buddy and a cat named Socks.

Improvement at the border

A member of the International Organization for Migration gives instructions to a migrant family before crossing the border into El Paso, Texas at the Leona Vicario shelter in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, Friday, Feb. 26, 2021. After waiting months and sometimes years in Mexico, people seeking asylum in the United States are being allowed into the country as they wait for courts to decide on their cases, unwinding one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration policies that President Joe Biden vowed to end. (AP Photo/Christian Chavez)

Chief of Staff Ron Klain retweeted this last night but I haven’t heard much discussion of it today:

It appears that the problem was temporary as the Biden administration was trying to get staffed up and deal with the problem. Which they are trying to do. (It might have been helpful if the Trump administration had been doing something other than screech about the election during the final two months of their term — and let the Biden team have a transition.)

Anyway, in case you are wondering why all the polls are showing a vast majority of the country seeing Biden as a failure already on this issue, check out this analysis at Media Matters. The mainstream media need to take heed:

Since the election of President Joe Biden in November, a right-wing media ecosystem of both Fox News and right-leaning Facebook pages has dominated the national conversation on immigration. CNN, MSNBC, and left-leaning pages eventually followed in the steps of these conservative actors, most notably when attention turned to the increase in migration at the southern border in late February and early March.

According to Media Matters’ internal database, although Fox has steadily misinformed about immigration since the 2020 election, the network’s immigration programming began to significantly spike near Biden’s inauguration, relentlessly increasing through March. Fox fearmongering on immigration issues has been consistently xenophobicbiased, and inaccurate, culminating in the recent whole-hearted and unapologetic embrace of the white supremacist “replacement” conspiracy theory.

CNN and MSNBC largely ignored immigration topics throughout the transition and well into the Biden administration. Rather, these two networks dedicated significant coverage to the increase in migration at the southern border only after Fox began focusing on Biden’s “crisis,” a characterization of the increase in migration CNN and MSNBC seemingly adopted. While mentions of a “crisis” at the border began to pick up on Fox throughout February, the network went all in on the term during the week of February 28. CNN and MSNBC, which largely hadn’t been using the “crisis” framing in their conversations about the border, began to do so more heavily the week after Fox News’ oversaturated coverage.

Immigration segments on weekday cable news
Mentions of "crisis" at the border on cable news

Right-leaning Facebook pages similarly dominated the online conversation about immigration with the end of the Trump administration in late 2020 through the beginning of the Biden administration in 2021. This prevalence was also notable in pages dedicated to talk about the “crisis” of the migration increase at the border, and the conversation spiked in interactions and overall quantity at roughly the same time as the cable networks pushed this narrative in late February. Right-leaning pages’ posts about immigration and the “crisis” at the border often pushed racist tropes and stereotypes and were rife with misinformation.

immigration posts on FB after the 2020 election
Border "crisis" posts on Facebook since the 2020 election

How a narrative bounces around the online echo chamber

Click over to see the details of how this happens. It’s pretty amazing.

This is a pernicious narrative that may very well hurt the Democrats in 2022 and the right knows it. They are being aided by the media which fell into those old well-worn grooves without a second thought.

Can we take yes for an answer?

It appears that we can:

Progressives were frequently aghast at candidate Joe Biden’s instinct for moderation, his nostalgia for a bygone era and a record they perceived as too corporate-friendly and out of touch with his changing party.

But nearly 100 days into his term, some are happy to admit, they may be wrong.

“Many of us were disappointed when President Biden got the nomination,” said newly elected Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., who defeated a 16-term incumbent in a primary last year. “When you look at Biden’s career, he’s definitely someone we would call a moderate Democrat.”

He is less disappointed today.

“Biden has been incredibly responsive to the progressive movement,” Bowman said, recounting a recent meeting between progressive House members and White House chief of staff Ron Klain. “He told us point-blank: Keep pushing us. Keep us honest.”

Liberals are pleased with Biden’s $1.9 trillion Covid-19 relief bill and his swift rejection of Republican attempts to cut it. They like his $2.25 trillion infrastructure and jobs proposal. They’re pleasantly surprised with his personnel decisions, particularly the hiring of Klain and the shunning of moderate Democratic White House veterans like Larry Summers and Rahm Emanuel.

“I don’t think they would have been better if Bernie Sanders was the president,” Larry Cohen, a former union leader who chairs the Sanders-aligned group Our Revolution, said of Biden’s staffing decisions.

“The question will be the tenacity,” he said. “These are the best proposals you could ever expect, but the question will be fighting for those things.”

Biden’s first 100 days have mostly been praised by a movement that was skeptical to outright antagonistic about his candidacy, according to more than 20 progressive lawmakers, strategists and activists who spoke to NBC News about the key relationship poised to define his presidency.

Here’s a good one from Kos on how it’s shaking out:

You could go back to the primary days and read headlines I wrote about then-candidate Joe Biden. They weren’t flattering. You see, he was a dinosaur, he had a history of moderation, he wanted to chase the “bipartisan” pony, he supported George W. Bush’s Iraq War and authored the hated 1994 crime bill; he was an old white guy in a party that is as diverse as America. And his primary campaign reflected that history, arguing that he could bring Republican votes to his agenda, that what America needed was a return to Obama’s America (and nothing more dramatic), and that he wasn’t interested in anything as aggressive as the Green New Deal or other such progressive priorities. 

Indeed, wasn’t this a historic opportunity to finally break America’s race and gender glass ceiling, the time to elect a progressive woman, or a woman of color? Donald Trump was historically unpopular, with a campaign that reflected the chaos and incompetence of his presidency. His party had suffered historic defeats in 2017, 2018, and 2019, even losing governorships in blood-red Kentucky and Louisiana—despite Trump’s deep engagement. At long last, this was our chance to elect a true progressive! 

And then Black voters in South Carolina took a look at the field, considered America’s relationship with race and gender, and said, “Nope, we ain’t chancing it. Getting rid of Trump is our number one priority, and the old white guy is the safest bet getting there.” 

It hurts so much to admit it, because it says things about America that we all wish weren’t true (mainly, that we still have a long way to go on equality), but not only were they right to place all the chips on Biden, but he may very well be the only Democrat who could’ve beaten Trump last year. By virtue of his race, gender, and sexual orientation, Biden avoided the visceral, vitriolic hatred that conservatives muster up for anyone that doesn’t look or love like them. Given the historic progressive turnout and tight margins in key states, would anyone truly want to bet that Sens. Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, or my own political love, Elizabeth Warren, would’ve done just as good or better? It truly was Biden or bust, and South Carolina’s Black community pulled the right lever. 

But amazingly, the types of left-on-a-Democratic-president conflict we all expected never materialized. In fact, can anyone argue that Biden’s agenda would look much different from Warren’s, or even Bernie’s? The man with an entire career of staid institutionalist centrism is now forging the most progressive presidency since FDR. And no one saw it coming. Biden didn’t even wink-wink at us during the primary. There were no dog whistles. He hoodwinked all of us progressives … in a great way! 

And Republicans are flummoxed, impotent, under this dramatic and sustained effort to redistribute our nation’s wealth. Their media organs can’t muster up anything beyond manufactured outrage over Dr. Seuss and Mr. Potato Head. Knock yourselves out, Fox News! It’s so hard for conservatives to get angry at an old white guy that they are ignoring the substance of his (popular) agenda, and literally inventing nonsense out of thin air, such as “Joe Biden wants to take away your meat.” 

Imagine anyone else with the exact same agenda. Imagine it was President Harris, or President Warren, or President Sanders, with the exact same $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, and the same exact multi-trillion dollar infrastructure and child care and healthcare plans. Imagine them mouthing the same words Biden has. Literally, just swap out the president and leave everything else the same. And tell me there wouldn’t be massive nationwide conservative tea party 2.0 protests against them. Yet with Biden, that old, relatively boring white guy? Crickets. 

Meanwhile, progressives can’t believe what’s happening. “One thing that I will say is that I do think that the Biden administration and President Biden have exceeded expectations that progressives had,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said. “I’ll be frank, I think a lot of us expected a lot more conservative administration.” Sanders said, “[Biden] was a moderate Democrat throughout his time in the Senate, who had the courage to look at the moment and say, you know what? The future of American democracy is at stake, tens of millions of people are struggling economically. They’re really in pain. Our kids are hurting. Seniors are hurting. I’ve got to act boldly. And Biden deserves credit for that.”

Meanwhile, not only is Biden’s national popularity in positive territory—48-46 in Civiqs, and much higher in some other polls (something Trump never managed to do), but the legislation and policies he’s pursuing poll off the charts. And as Kerry Eleveld pointed out a couple of days ago, there is nary a grassroots oppositional response—no new tea party or Women’s March or any other organized opposition. All we have is a dead-ender Q “movement,” and a seditionist militia movement being systematically dissembled by the FBI and Justice Departments. Mighty convenient of them to out themselves with their failed putsch. 

And best of all, no one outside of West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin is playing the “bipartisan” game anymore. Certainly not Biden, who has successfully and accurately redefined “bipartisan” as “supported by most Americans, including Republicans.” Senate ghoul Mitch McConnell no longer gets to unilaterally determine whether something is bipartisan because—spoiler alert—nothing of substance will ever be ‘bipartisan’ on his watch. And Senate Democrats are happily fueling that new narrative

Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.), a close Biden ally, has little hope that Democrats will reach an agreement with Republicans on the “big, bold” agenda the party is touting. He predicted the likeliest path forward will be one large package, all done through so-called budget reconciliation to work around a Senate filibuster.

Democrats don’t have to “pass something just so we can say ‘Well, that piece over there was bipartisan,’ and wait for the pat on the back,” Casey said. “People want us to get big things done — and if that means we can do it in a bipartisan fashion, that’s great. I just don’t have confidence that that’s going to happen.”

In case you had forgotten, Casey is considered a Senate “moderate.” He’s no Bernie- or Warren-style firebrand. And even he’s given up the “bipartisan” fantasy. 

Republicans used that Democratic desperation for bipartisanship to great effect in the past, delaying passage of Obama’s Affordable Care Act by 14 months by pretending to be good-faith negotiators in the process. Biden was right there in the middle of that mess, and he learned from it. He didn’t let us in on it! Not even a hint!

But he learned from it. 

And thus, at 100 days, we’re witnessing a transformative presidency, more consequential than anything since forever. (I’ll let historians pin an actual date on that.) And he’s done so despite a 50-50 Senate with zero Republican votes, freakin’ Joe Manchin gumming everything he possibly can, and Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema utterly misreading her state. Imagine what we might be able to do if Democrats can get some breathing room in the Senate next year and hold the House. 

So here’s a toast to being wrong, so utterly wrong, so wrong wrong wrong. So were you, even if you supported Biden. You didn’t see this coming. That’s okay! Neither did anyone else. Even if he never let on, it was progressive energy that delivered Biden’s victory, and he is paying that effort back. That doesn’t mean we let our guard down or give Biden a pass when he strays, but wow, it’s nice waking up in the morning to see what good things have been announced, as opposed to dreading the damage the last guy would wreak. 

And let’s remember that everything hangs precariously on an edge, with an unfavorable redistricting environment ahead of us. If we want this party to continue for years, get ready to rev up next year. Now we know what we’re fighting for, and it’s damn good. 

He’s right. It feels good to at least see good things proposed and feel that the party really means it. Whether they can get it done remains to be seen. And the challenge is only going to get harder. But at least there’s a chance.

Pushin’ that fascism, night after night

A month or so ago, Tucker Carlson and a guest made the case that fascism was pretty much inevitable in America:

For years, Tucker Carlson has used his Fox News program to flirt with fascist and white nationalist talking points. In 2018, the host described racial demographic changes in a Pennsylvania town as “more change than human beings are designed to digest” after noting that the area is majority Hispanic. He also accused immigrants of making the U.S. “dirtier,” “poorer,” and “more divided”; claimed that a “flood of illegal workers into the United States has damaged our communities, ruined our schools, burdened our health care system, and fractured our national unity”; and falsely asserted that the Potomac River is becoming “dirtier and dirtier” due to immigrants. 

On Thursday night, Carlson took these arguments a step further by agreeing with a guest, Jesse Kelly, who confidently asserted that the U.S. will “pick a fascist [leader] within 10 to 20 years.” Kelly, whose past commentary on political violence has gained notoriety due to his fixating on the possibility of a second civil war, made the remark as the two discussed the Hunter Biden firearm debacle and accused Democratic leaders of getting away with a double standard in the legal system. “I think you make a really solid point about the sadness and the powerlessness that people feel in the face of this. And at some point people are going to say, ‘Why should I follow the rules? Why should I be a good citizen if they don’t have to follow the rules?’” Carlson said. “I mean, things kind of break down at some point, don’t they?” 

“They will break down, they are breaking down, Tucker,” Kelly replied. “I have said this before, and I’m telling you I’m worried that I’m right, the right is going to pick a fascist within 10 to 20 years.” Carlson chimed in to say that Kelly’s prediction was “right,” before the guest added that the U.S. has “60, 70 million of us. We’re not a tiny minority, and if we’re going to be all treated like criminals and all subject to every single law, while antifa, Black Lives Matter guys go free and Hunter Biden goes free, then the right’s going to take drastic measures.” 

Carlson again cosigned the comments, while Kelly insisted, “It’s about justice, that [Hunter Biden is] never held accountable for it and none of the Bidens are, but you would be, Tucker, and so would I.” Concluding the conversation, Carlson said, “That’s so well put and you’re absolutely right. We’re moving toward actual extremism because they’re undermining the system that kept extremism at bay. I don’t think we can say that enough. I’m so glad that you just said it. Jesse Kelly, thank you.”

He doesn’t want to be a fascist. It’s just that the liberals are giving him no choice. (And you have to love the idea of the white authoritraians whining about being subject to “every single law”)

Here’s the latest:

Here it is. And there’s more. He even claims that Biden said “people who disagree with him” are terrorists:

JOE BIDEN: 100 days since I took the oath of office and lifted my hand off our family bible and inherited a nation, we all did, that was in crisis. The worst pandemic in a century, the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. The worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War. 

[END CLIP]

TUCKER CARLSON (HOST): Really? The worst attack on our democracy in 160 years? How about the Immigration Act of 1965? That law completely changed the composition of America’s voter rolls, purely to benefit the Democratic Party. That seems like kind of an assault on democracy, a permanent one. But no, that was a good thing, because in the end, it helped Joe Biden.

I wonder if he’s thought through a “final solution” to the problem?

The Horror

https://twitter.com/AC360/status/1387927338445418499

It’s just awful:

At Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, a huge facility in the middle of India’s capital, 37 fully vaccinated doctors came down with Covid-19 earlier this month.

The infections left most with mild symptoms, but it added to their growing fears that the virus behind India’s catastrophic second wave is different. They wonder if a more contagious variant that dodges the immune system could be fueling the epidemic inside the world’s hardest-hit nation.

So far the evidence is inconclusive, and researchers caution that other factors could explain the viciousness of the outbreak, which has overwhelmed India’s capital so quickly that hospitals are entirely overrun and crematories burn nonstop. Still, the presence of the variant could complicate the taming of India’s Covid-19 disaster.

“The current wave of Covid has a different clinical behavior,” said Dr. Sujay Shad, a senior cardiac surgeon at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, where two of the doctors needed supplemental oxygen to recover. “It’s affecting young adults. It’s affecting families. It’s a new thing altogether. Two-month-old babies are getting infected.”

India’s outbreak worsened even further on Wednesday, as the authorities reported nearly 3,300 daily deaths. That brings the official total to nearly 201,200 people lost, though experts believe the true figure is much higher. Daily new infections also surged to nearly 357,700, another record.

Waiting to refill empty oxygen tanks.

As supplies run dangerously low and hospitals are forced to turn away the sick, scientists are trying to determine what role variants of the virus might be playing. They are working with precious little data. India, like many other countries, has not built up a robust system to track viruses.

India’s worries have focused on a homegrown variant called B.1.617. The public, the popular press and many doctors have concluded that it is responsible for the severity of the second wave.

Researchers outside of India say the limited data so far suggests instead that a better-known variant called B.1.1.7 may be a more considerable factor. That variant walloped Britain late last year, hit much of Europe and is now the most common source of new infection in the United States.

“While it’s almost certainly true B.1.617 is playing a role, it’s unclear how much it’s contributing directly to the surge and how that compares to other circulating variants, especially B.1.1.7,” said Kristian Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research Institute in San Diego.A mass cremation in New Delhi on Tuesday.Performing last rites in New Delhi for someone who died from the coronavirus.

Beyond the variants, scientists believe there are other, possibly more obvious factors that could be powering India’s deadly second wave.

India has just scraped the surface in terms of vaccinating its population, with less than 2 percent fully vaccinated. Experts also blame lax public behavior after last year’s first wave and missteps by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, such as recently holding large political rallies that may have spread the disease and sent a message to the people that the worst was over.

“There is a lot of jumping to conclusions that B.1.167 is the explanation for what’s happening,” said Jeffrey Barrett, director of the Covid-19 genomics initiative at the Wellcome Sanger Institute in Britain. “These other things are probably more likely to be the explanation.”

Preliminary evidence suggests that the variant is still responsive to vaccines, although slightly less so. India relies heavily on the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, which clinical trials show is less powerful than the vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna and could perhaps be more easily thwarted by mutations.

“For now the vaccines remain effective, but there is a trend toward less effectiveness,” said Dr. Céline Gounder, an infectious disease physician and epidemiologist at Bellevue Hospital in New York.

In India, a number of doctors point to anecdotal evidence that people who have been fully vaccinated are getting sick. Those doctors also say they are seeing children with serious symptoms, such as severe diarrhea, acidosis and falling blood pressure, even among otherwise healthy patients.

“This is very different from what we saw last year,” said Dr. Soonu Udani, head of critical care services at the SRCC Children’s Hospital in Mumbai.Health workers testing recent arrivals at a train station in Mumbai earlier this month.A mostly deserted vaccination center in Mumbai earlier this month, when a lockdown limited visitors.

Researchers say other factors could lead to more infections among young people, such as India’s schools, which had started reopening in recent months after the country’s first wave.

The variant in India is sometimes called “the double mutant,” though the name is a misnomer because it has many more mutations than two. It garnered the name because one of its three versions contains two genetic mutations found in other difficult-to-control variants of the coronavirus. One is present in the highly contagious variant that ripped through California earlier this year. The other is similar to one found in the variant first identified in South Africa and is believed to make the vaccines slightly less effective.

“There are variants that are more transmissible than what we all coped with a year ago,” Dr. Barrett said of the many variants circulating in India. “Things can change really quickly, so if a country doesn’t react quickly enough, things can go from bad to very bad very quickly.”

Scientists say that different variants seem to dominate specific parts of India. For instance, the B.1.617 variant has been detected in a large number of samples from the central state of Maharashtra.

By contrast, the B.1.1.7 variant is rising quickly in New Delhi, said Dr. Sujeet Singh, director of India’s National Centre for Disease Control. It was prevalent in half of samples evaluated at the end of March, up from 28 percent just two weeks before. The B.1.617 variant is also circulating in New Delhi, he added.

I wish the media would pay closer attention to this. Cases are rising in Latin America as well. Nobody is entirely sure why except that the variants do seem to be more virulent.

The good news for Americans is that the vaccines seem to still be effective against them. But that could change. Getting the world vaccinated is the single most urgent goal on the planet if we want to avoid having rolling pandemics as these viruses mutate and science races to defeat them. I don’t want to live in that world.

And I don’t give a flying fuck about right wingers’ “liberty.” They will kill people with this nonsense and not wanting to get a vaccine or wear a mask is not an act of self-defense. Everyone needs to get vaccinated.

It’s all up to the Democrats

President Joe Biden gave his first speech to a joint session of Congress this week and by most accounts, it was a successful event. The TV ratings weren’t high but according to snap polls, those that did watch liked what he had to say and the media were complimentary about his delivery and presentation — which is half the battle.

Biden introduced a new piece of legislation called the American Family Act which features items such as paid family leave, universal daycare and preschool, free community college, elder care, and a number of other initiatives that other developed countries have had for years but which Americans have been staring at longingly from afar. It’s obvious that if we want a 21st Century economy, we’re going to have to at least catch up to what other countries have been doing since the middle of the 20th.

His initiative comes on the heels of the previously announced American Jobs Act (aka Biden’s infrastructure plan) and the already passed American Rescue Plan Act, as well as his administration’s very successful vaccine roll-out. Considering that Biden had virtually no transition and came into office on the heels of an insurrection and in the middle of a global pandemic, that’s not a bad first 100 days.

But the hard work is really just beginning.

The government has responded well to the pandemic crisis, which is a refreshing change from the previous administration. And the big COVID relief package has given the economy the boost it needed to recover (and it is recovering smartly). But Biden’s platform is much more ambitious. Taking office at a time of great turmoil in the country after years of unnecessary wars, economic and social stagnation, as well as pent-up demand for racial justice, he and the Democrats have decided to try to enact a truly transformative agenda.

Of course, that is a very tall order. As we are all well aware, the Democrats have a very narrow majority in the upper chamber and there are a few senators who seem to be determined to pare down these ambitious goals in the name of “bipartisanship” and “fiscal responsibility.” If that sounds familiar, it should. Centrist Democrats have been wringing their hands over deficits and taxes for the past 40 years, a form of inherited political PTSD from the Reagan Revolution. But there are fewer of them than there used to be and it’s always possible that after much cajoling, sweet-talk and flattery, party leaders will find a way to corral them into going with the program without watering it down to nothing but a puddle of lukewarm water.

And then there is the GOP.

One of the reasons the first hundred days are often able to produce some big achievements is that the other party is usually back on its heels. There’s a period of confusion about what went wrong, a jockeying for power, and indecision about how best to deal with the new majority. It takes a while to settle down and decide on a strategy. And in this case, all of that is magnified by the fact that Donald Trump refused to concede the election and his followers staged a violent insurrection to stop the peaceful transfer of power and the whole ordeal still looms over the party like a big nuclear cloud.

The stories about pilgrimages to Mar-a-Lago, Twitter selfies of House leaders groveling for forgiveness after suggesting that Trump’s behavior on January 6th was irresponsible and the dispensing of phony “awards” to make him feel valued, all expose the ongoing illness at the heart of the party. Despite some attempts by Never Trumpers and some obvious positioning by ambitious politicians looking for an opening, the base of the party is still under the control of Donald J. Trump and that means everything is still really all about him.

Adding to the confusion is the fact that Republican dogma was pretty much discredited even before Trump came on the scene. He drop-kicked most of it into oblivion with his incoherent program of libertine values, trade wars, tax cuts, deficits and wall building. He had a hold on the voters the Republican establishment couldn’t bear to cross so even aside from enabling his disgusting personal behavior, they gave up any claim to ideological credibility. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell can wax on about the Democrats’ “court-packing” or attempting to usurp the sacred process of the Senate but it will just elicit laughter.

Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina tried to revert to the pre-Trump talking points in his rebuttal to President Biden on Wednesday night and it sounded downright bizarre, as if we were listening to a scratchy, old recording of some radio speech in the 1930s. He complained about the American Families Plan being “even more taxing, even more spending, to put Washington even more in the middle of your life — from the cradle to college” and called the infrastructure plan a “partisan wish list.”

Yawn. After the Trump spending spree they all gleefully signed on to, those tired old saws have no credibility at all. Times have changed. Last Sunday’s NBC News poll showed that 55 percent of Americans thought the government should focus on doing more to help people, while just 41 percent said it was already trying to do too many things. As the NY Times pointed out, “in the 1990s, it was the other way around; during the George W. Bush and Obama presidencies, NBC polls usually found the country more evenly split.”

Still, Scott denounced Biden for dividing the country, disingenuously blaming him for the fact that Republicans unanimously refused to vote for his COVID relief bill when Democrats all voted for Trump’s. He unctuously declared “COVID brought Congress together five times; this administration pushed us apart,” giving Tucker Carlson a run for his money for the troll of the year award. But it was his Trumpian flourish on the issue of race that shows that the culture war is really all Republicans have left. Scott pulled out the “reverse racism” card, virtually guaranteed to make the Trump followers squeal with delight to see a Black politician defend their point of view.

The Republicans cannot credibly oppose Biden’s agenda. Their arguments about debt and tax cuts have been refuted, their ideas about radical individualism have been shredded by our experience with the pandemic, their claims to moral authority in the wake of Trump are simply laughable. All they have is power and they will wield it mercilessly. But they have no way to explain it to the broader American public that makes any sense.

The only question, then, is whether or not that makes any sense to the centrist Democrats like West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin or the two senators from Arizona, Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly. Sadly, there is a fair chance that other than the hardcore Trumpers who will believe anything they’re told, these Democratic senators will be the only people in America to whom it does. They must be persuaded that now is the time, while the Republicans are ideologically spent and the economy is set to blast off, to do something real and meaningful for the American people.

These occasions don’t come very often. It would be a crime if the Democrats let this chance slip from their grasp.

Salon

“Good mayor, awful man”

Here we go:

The FBI warned Rudolph W. Giuliani in late 2019 that he was the target of a Russian influence operation aimed at circulating falsehoods intended to damage President Biden politically ahead of last year’s election, according to people familiar with the matter.

The warning was part of an extensive effort by the bureau to alert members of Congress and at least one conservative media outlet, One America News, that they faced a risk of being used to further Russia’s attempt to influence the election’s outcome, said several current and former U.S. officials. All spoke on the condition of anonymity because the matter remains highly sensitive.

Giuliani received the FBI’s warning while deeply involved with former president Donald Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign and related activities in Ukraine to surface unflattering or incriminating information about the Biden family. The revelation comes as the FBI this week seized Giuliani’s cellphone and other electronic devices as part of a long-running criminal investigation into whether the onetime New York mayor and personal attorney for Trump acted as an unregistered foreign agent.

We don’t need no stinking FARA.

“Good mayor, awful man,” says former New York City police commissioner William Bratton at the end of the first clip below.

Treat yourself to Chris Hayes’s interview with former New York Daily News reporter Michael Daly (now at the Daily Beast; timestamp 2:30). One amazing Rudy Giuliani anecdote after another, including how the has-been became “America’s Mayor.”

“Michael Cohen says that Rudy’s dumb,” Daly says. “He’s not at all dumb. He’s just nuts.”

“He just is,” Daly continues. “This is a guy, he used to scream about parole, the evils of parole. And it turns out that he was conceived when his father was on parole for armed robbery. And Rudy wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for parole.”

He wouldn’t exist now if it weren’t for Trump and the Russians.

So much hate

Four Minneapolis police officers hold down George Floyd, May 25,2020.

Someone is trying to ignite a war between the U.S. and Russia. Fromer Navy SEAL John Kelly (Michael B. Jordan) is caught in the middle in Tom Clancy’s Without Remorse (2021). Why willingly start a war? (Spoiler alert). Because without an external enemy, Americans are turning on each other instead.

There is plenty of that outside the movies. Two Trump loyalists on Thursday faced justice for making threats against a federal judge and government officials, Marcy Wheeler reports:

In DC, QAnoner Frank Caporusso pled guilty to threatening Emmet Sullivan because of his decisions in the Mike Flynn case. His statement of facts admitted that he called Sullivan’s chamber and warned,

We are professionals. We are trained military people. We will be on rooftops. You will not be safe. A hot piece of lead will cut through your skull. You bastard. You will be killed, and I don’t give a fuck who you are. Back out of this bullshit before it’s too late, or we’ll start cutting down your staff. This is not a threat. This is a promise.

Caporusso could receive 18-24 months in prison, with credit for time served since August.

And the second?

In New York, a jury found Trump supporter Brendan Hunt guilty of making death threats against government officials, including calling for the execution of AOC, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi on December 6. On January 8, he called to return to DC with guns to “slaughter these motherfuckers.” On January 12, in response to a General Flynn Parler text calling on people to act responsibly, Hunt responded, “enough with the ‘trust the plan’ bullshit. lets go, jan 20, bring your guns.”

Wheeler believes that because he went to trial rather than pleading, Hunt’s sentence could be longer than Caporusso’s.

Hate crimes

In Feb. 2020, three coastal South Georgia men grabbed guns and jumped into vehicles to hunt down a Black jogger as though they were on safari. The men will face hate crimes charges over the slaying of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man (New York Times):

The suspects — Travis McMichael, 35; his father, Gregory McMichael, 65; and William Bryan, 51, all of whom are white — were each charged with one count of interference with Mr. Arbery’s right to use a public street because of his race. They were also charged with one count of attempted kidnapping.

Travis and Gregory McMichael were also charged with one count each of using, carrying and brandishing a firearm. Travis McMichael is accused of shooting Mr. Arbery.

The men intimidated Mr. Arbery “because of Arbery’s race and color,” the eight-page indictment said.

“As Arbery was running on a public street in the Satilla Shores neighborhood of Brunswick, Ga., Travis McMichael and Gregory McMichael armed themselves with firearms, got into a truck and chased Arbery through the public streets of the neighborhood while yelling at Arbery, using their truck to cut off his route and threatening him with firearms,” the Justice Department said in a statement.

Arbery’s killing happened months before the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis last year set off a national wave of protests against police violence.

Local prosecutors filed no charges against the Georgia men after the killing. Then in May 2020, a New York Times article and a video surfaced that presssured the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to get involved and make arrests. On Wednesday, federal authorities indicted the three on federal hate crime charges and for attempted kidnapping.

The case resonated in troubling and familiar ways, raising questions about racial profiling, the interpretation of self-defense laws and the wisdom of citizen policing.

Exactly one year after Mr. Arbery was killed, his mother, Wanda Cooper-Jones, filed a lawsuit against prosecutors, law enforcement officers and the three men charged with murdering her son. The lawsuit accuses the parties of engaging in an orchestrated cover-up in the aftermath of the shooting, and of depriving Mr. Arbery of his constitutional rights.

The jury is out

Georgetown law professor Paul Butler believes the conviction of Derek Chauvin for Floyd’s murder was not the real test of whether U.S. justice is ready to hold police accountable for killing Black men. Three other former Minneapolis police officers are set to go to trial in August for their roles in Floyd’s murder. Prosecutors in these cases will find it harder to convince a jury that their conduct was criminal.

“A guilty verdict against these three would be even more significant than the jury’s conviction of Chauvin, because it would punish a far more routine form of police misconduct: active support for, or pretending not to see, another officer abusing his or her badge,” Butler writes.

J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas Lane and Tou Thao did more than just watch as Chauvin killed Floyd, the state alleges; they participated.

Kueng and Lane were rookies. It was Kueng’s third shift and Lane’s fourth day as an officer. Chauvin was Kueng’s training officer, Butler explains:

Their defense will emphasize their efforts to help Floyd. After Floyd went silent and his body limp, Kueng told Chauvin he could not detect a pulse. Lane asked whether they should roll Floyd on his side, but Chauvin declined. Thao apparently had no physical contact with Floyd as he was being held down by the other officers.

None of those are formal defenses to aiding and abetting, but the sympathy that jurors frequently feel for police officers in difficult situations is more likely to be invoked here than for Chauvin. In addition, both Kueng and Thao are people of color, which may help rebut the concerns about racism that, after Floyd’s death, launched the biggest social justice protests in the United States since the civil rights movement.

Butler concludes with a reflection on :

In my view, this is a case where any conviction and punishment — even a short prison sentence — would be better than none. It would be a step in dismantling the blue wall of silence under which first responders close ranks when they see another officer doing wrong — refusing to intervene even when it would be lifesaving.

Dismantling the blue wall might save lives. But it won’t unwind the paranoia, the hate, or the “Animal Farm” reasoning that some lives are more equal than others.

Whiny baby says what?

Somebody is living in a dream world:

Former President Donald Trump on Thursday called himself “the father of the vaccine,” and declared that his administration had saved “tens of millions of lives” in its efforts to push for the quick development of COVID-19 shots.

“They’re very ungracious people,” Trump said of the Biden administration during a Fox Business interview on Thursday morning, bemoaning what he believed was undue credit attributed to his successor for the coronavirus vaccine’s development. “I did the vaccine.”

“If I weren’t president — the vaccine — you wouldn’t have a vaccine for five years, three to five years would be the minimum,” Trump continued. “I got it done in less than nine months. And that’s only because of me.”

The comments from an embittered former president striving to claim enduring relevance in the sector of public health which he spent months undermining come on the heels of President Joe Biden on Wednesday addressing a joint session of Congress, touting his administration’s successful vaccine rollout.

In remarks on Wednesday he said that his administration had surpassed its promise to provide 100 million COVID-19 vaccine shots in 100 days — “we will have provided over 220 million COVID shots in 100 days,” Biden said.

“When I was sworn in, less than 1% of seniors were fully vaccinated against COVID-19,” he added.

The comments did not sit well with the former president who said that everyone is now eager to get a vaccine “and that was all done by Trump.”

“And look, I guess in a certain way I’m the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it. To get it done in less than nine months was a miracle,” he added.

The only thing he did was give the ok to do in the US what scientists all over the world were already doing and what any president would have done in the same situation. But he wants people to believe that he and Scott Atlas whipped them up in the White House kitchen after Hannity one night. I think we know it’s not true.

The country suffered through almost a full year of pandemic hell led by a clown who refused to properly deal with it because it interrupted his rallies and threatened his re-election campaign. He pushed snake oil cures promoted by Laura Ingraham and instructed scientists to investigate whether household disinfectant might be injected to “clean the lungs.” His own pandemic task force coordinator has said that pretty much everyone who died beyond the original 100,000 was preventable.

His relentless insistence that he get any credit when it was so blazingly obvious that everything changed the minute he vacated Washington is just delusional. He has a massive amount of blood on his hands.

Rudy speaks. It’s not good.

Oy, it’s pretty pathetic isn’t it?

During an interview Thursday with Fox Business, Trump condemned the raid on Giuliani’s properties, calling it “a very, very unfair situation.”

“He just loves this country. And they raid his apartment, it’s like, so unfair and such a double — like a double standard, like I don’t think anybody’s ever seen before,” Trump said.

“Rudy is a patriot who loves this country, and I don’t know what they’re looking for, what they’re doing.”

Oh, I think he does, don’t you? For instance:

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people.

I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.

Zelensky:Yes it is very important for me and everything that you just mentioned earlier. For me as a President, it is very important and we are open for any future cooperation. We are ready to open a new page on cooperation in relations between the United States and Ukraine. For that purpose, I just recalled our ambassador from United States and he will be replaced by a very competent and very experienced ambassador who will work hard on making sure that our two nations are getting closer. I would also like and hope to see him having your trust and your confidence and have personal relations with you so we can cooperate even more so.

I will personally tell you that one of my assistants spoke with Mr. Giuliani just recently and we are hoping very much that Mr. Giuliani will be able to travel to Ukraine and we will meet once he comes to Ukraine. I just wanted to assure you once again that you have nobody but friends around us. I will make sure that I surround myself with the best and most experienced people. I also wanted to tell you that we are friends. We are great friends and you Mr. President have friends in our country so we can continue our strategic partnership. I also plan to surround myself with great people and in addition to that investigation, I guarantee as the President of Ukraine that all the investigations will be done openly and candidly. That I can assure you.

Trump: Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that’s really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great.

Trump: The former ambassador from the United States, the woman was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, here’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it… It sounds horrible to me…

Trump: Well, she’s going to go through some things. I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I’m sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything. Your economy is going to get better and better I predict. You have a lot of assets. It’s a great country. I have many Ukrainian friends, they are incredible people.

Zelensky:I would like to tell you that I also have quite a few Ukrainian friends that live in the United States. Actually last time I traveled to the United States, I stayed in New York near Central Park and I stayed at the Trump Tower. I will talk to them and I hope to see them again in the future. I also wanted to thank you for your invitation to visit the United States, specifically Washington DC. On the other hand, I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation. As to the economy, there is much potential for our two countries and one of the issues that is very important for Ukraine is energy independence. I believe we can be very successful and cooperating on energy independence with United States. We are already working on cooperation. We are buying American oil but I am very hopeful for a future meeting. We will have more time and more opportunities to discuss these opportunities and get to know each other better. I would like to thank you very much for your support.

Trump: Good. Well., thank you very much and I appreciate that. I will tell Rudy and Attorney General Barr to call. Thank you. Whenever you would like to come to the White House, feel free to call. Give us a date and we’ll work that out. I look forward to seeing you.

Is Rudy being investigate for illegally lobbying on behalf of Ukraine? Probably. Is that all? Who knows? But it’s all connected to Trump, Ukraine and the grotesque plan to smear Joe Biden by withholding congressionally approved aid — for which Trump was impeached and allowed to skate because of his cowardly, traitorous party.

It’s all part of the same story of a man and his minions trying to usurp democracy to remain in power by undemocratic means. He was impeached for doing this twice and they protected him both times. They are still licking his boots. It’s important to remember how this all came down.

Update —

Yep:

Two years ago, Rudolph W. Giuliani finally got one thing he had been seeking in Ukraine: The Trump administration removed the U.S. ambassador there, a woman Mr. Giuliani believed had been obstructing his efforts to dig up dirt on the Biden family.

It was a Pyrrhic victory. Mr. Giuliani’s push to oust the ambassador, Marie L. Yovanovitch, not only became a focus of President Donald J. Trump’s first impeachment trial, but it has now landed Mr. Giuliani in the cross hairs of a federal criminal investigation into whether he broke lobbying laws, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

The long-running inquiry reached a turning point this week when F.B.I. agents seized telephones and computers from Mr. Giuliani’s home and office in Manhattan, the people said. At least one of the warrants was seeking evidence related to Ms. Yovanovitch and her role as ambassador, the people said.

In particular, the federal authorities were expected to scour the electronic devices for communications between Mr. Giuliani and Trump administration officials about the ambassador before she was recalled in April 2019, one of the people added.

The warrant also sought his communications with Ukrainian officials who had butted heads with Ms. Yovanovitch, including some of the same people who at the time were helping Mr. Giuliani seek damaging information about President Biden, who was then a candidate, and his family, the people said.

At issue for investigators is a key question: Did Mr. Giuliani go after Ms. Yovanovitch solely on behalf of Mr. Trump, who was his client at the time? Or was he also doing so on behalf of the Ukrainian officials, who wanted her removed for their own reasons?Keep up with the new Washington — get live updates on politics.

It is a violation of federal law to lobby the United States government on behalf of foreign officials without registering with the Justice Department, and Mr. Giuliani never did so.

Even if the Ukrainians did not pay Mr. Giuliani, prosecutors could pursue the theory that they provided assistance by collecting information on the Bidens in exchange for her removal.

What do you think?