Skip to content

Month: November 2021

Infrastructure!

President Biden signed the long awaited Infrastructure bill today. There were even some Republicans in attendance. Retiring Senator Rob Portman even felt the need to thank Donald Trump for allegedly initiating the conversation. The truth is, he didn’t do a damn thing.

Here’s a reminder of how the crack Trump team went about it from June 2017:

President Trump this week began rolling out what he bills as a massive plan to rebuild America’s highways, bridges, railways and airports — but Sen. Thomas R. Carper (Del.) is nowhere to be seen so far.

Back in January, as one of the Democratic point men on infrastructure, Carper politely asked the new transportation secretary, Elaine Chao, if they could discuss what had been one of Trump’s top priorities from the 2016 presidential campaign.

“It took several months for that to happen,” Carper recalled Monday.

He praised Chao as someone “I like a lot,” blaming her chronically understaffed agency for being incapable of promptly scheduling the meeting. When she told him to speak to Gary Cohn, the president’s chief economic adviser, Carper got one phone call and then participated in an hour-long bipartisan meeting with Cohn a few weeks ago to discuss financing the plan.

“That’s pretty much the extent of it. It’s not the kind of fulsome outreach that one might have hoped for and expected,” said Carper, the top Democrat on the Environment and Public Works Committee.

In a different political orbit, Trump may have marked what the White House is calling “infrastructure week”with a signing ceremony for his first major bipartisan victory: making good on his pledge to drive $1 trillion into rebuilding the nation’s roads, bridges, airports and waterways. Trump regularly won begrudging plaudits from Democrats who saw the plan as something that would energize the economy.

And regardless of the hesitancy of party leaders on Capitol Hill toward big spending, the idea resonated with Republican voters who backed Trump all across the industrial Midwest and handed him the presidency. Those voters heard bridge-building and highway construction, and they saw new jobs for their once-thriving manufacturing regions.

In a different political orbit, Trump may have marked what the White House is calling “infrastructure week”with a signing ceremony for his first major bipartisan victory: making good on his pledge to drive $1 trillion into rebuilding the nation’s roads, bridges, airports and waterways. Trump regularly won begrudging plaudits from Democrats who saw the plan as something that would energize the economy.

And regardless of the hesitancy of party leaders on Capitol Hill toward big spending, the idea resonated with Republican voters who backed Trump all across the industrial Midwest and handed him the presidency. Those voters heard bridge-building and highway construction, and they saw new jobs for their once-thriving manufacturing regions.

It never got any better. Two years later the Democrats were still at the table when Trump came in a finally blew the whole thing up with a toddler temper tantrum:

President Trump abruptly blew up an infrastructure meeting with Democratic leaders at the White House on Wednesday and declared that bipartisan cooperation was impossible while House committees are investigating him, underscoring the increasing combustibility between two warring branches of government.

Trump refused to even sit down when he walked into the scheduled Cabinet Room meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) and Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.). He then headed to a hastily called news conference in the Rose Garden.

Trump told reporters there that he gave the surprised Democratic leaders an ultimatum, warning that they needed to choose between pursuing infrastructure or their investigations of his finances, businesses and administration.

“You probably can’t go down two tracks,” he said. “You can go down the investigation track, or you can go down the investment track.

“I walked into the room and I told Sen. Schumer and Speaker Pelosi, ‘I want to do infrastructure. I want to do it more than you want to do it,’” said Trump.

“‘But you know what? You can’t do it under these circumstances. So get these phony investigations over with.’”

And that was that.

So sure, he talked about it. But he was too incompetent and too narcissistic to take yes for an answer. Of course, he blames Mitch:

He’s babbling incoherently there, as usual. But he’s also lying. The votes were there for an infrastructure bill all the way up until 2019. Democrats were terrified of voting against it and they almost certainly would have had the Manchin faction with them.

He blew up the talks because they were investigating him and tried to blackmail them into dropping the investigations.

The reality is that Trump not only didn’t pass anything significant during his tenure except the tax cuts for the rich because he didn’t understand or care about legislation. He wanted to throw his weight around with border walls and tariffs and executive orders. He just didn’t bother.

Personal Goon Squad

This piece by Max Boot about Trump’s henchman and former suitcase carrier, Johnny McEntee (who five years ago was a gopher at Fox News) and his attempts to oust the Defense Secretary is just creepy. Boot is right. If Trump gets back in, the military will end up being his personal goon squad:

Johnny McEntee, Trump’s director of presidential personnel, listing 14 reasons for ousting Esper. That document was dated Oct. 19, 2020. Three weeks later Esper was fired by a Trump tweet.

The very premise of McEntee’s memo was both sinister and ludicrous — a 30-year-old of no professional or intellectual distinction, whose path to power was carrying Trump’s bags, was making the case for getting rid of a senior Cabinet officer for insufficient loyalty to the president. This revealing and chilling document deserves to be read not as a historical curiosity but as a terrible portent of what could be in store if Trump wins another term. He appears determined to turn the military into his personal goon squad.

One of McEntee’s first complaints was that Esper had “approved the promotion of Lt. Col. [Alexander] Vindman, the start [sic] witness in the sham impeachment inquiry, who told Congress that the President’s call with Ukraine ‘undermined U.S. national security.’” No one has challenged the veracity of Vindman’s testimony, which was delivered under oath. Yet Trump, acting through McEntee, seemed intent on carrying out what Vindman described in a Post op-ed as “a campaign of bullying, intimidation and retaliation” for daring to tell the truth.

The next item in the indictment of Esper: “Publicly opposed the President’s direction to utilize American force to put down riots just outside the White House.” This was a reference to Esper’s brave decision in June 2020 to resist Trump’s desires to deploy active-duty troops to suppress Black Lives Matter protests.

Esper acted after he and Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had been lured by Trump into a bizarre photo op in Lafayette Square, which been cleared by force of peaceful protesters. Milley subsequently apologized and reminded military personnel that they are pledged to defend the Constitution, including “the right to freedom of speech and peaceful assembly.” This was presumably what sparked another of McEntee’s grievances against Esper: “Has failed to exercise oversight of the Joint Staff.”

McEntee further indicted Esper for acting to remove a symbol of racism and sedition — the Confederate flag — from military installations. He was upset, moreover, that the defense secretary had ruled out attacks “on cultural sites in Iran if the conflict escalated, despite the President wanting to keep that option open.” Attacking cultural sites would have been a war crime — but, according to McEntee, Esper should have been willing to commit a war crime at Trump’s direction.

McEntee also criticized Esper for spending too much time focused on competition with Russia. Left unstated was that Trump seems to hero-worship Russian President Vladimir Putin, who helped him win the 2016 election. Esper’s other transgressions of Trumpism included insufficient support for Trump’s capricious and discriminatory “transgender ban”; contradicting “the President in SEAL Eddie Gallagher’s case” (Trump reversed Gallagher’s demotion despite accusations he had committed war crimes); and dissenting from “the President’s decision to withdraw troops from Germany.” (McEntee gave a new Pentagon appointee working for Esper’s replacement, Christopher Miller, an isolationist to-do list that consisted of withdrawing troops from Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Germany.)

The most damning and telling grievance against Esper was near the bottom of this pathetic document: “When he assumed his role, he vowed to be apolitical.” Normally being apolitical is a sine qua non for leading the armed forces. That’s why President Biden chose retired Gen. Lloyd Austin as defense secretary and President Barack Obama decided to keep Republican Robert M. Gates in the post. But Trump tried to destroy the professional, apolitical ethos of the armed forces — and if given the opportunity, he will almost certainly do so again.

BTW: Trump and Biden are running almost neck and neck in polling matchups.

The Big Lie Doing It’s Work

I’m never sure if Steve Bannon and the other “thinkers” of the alt-right have a master plan. I suspect they think they do, but in reality they are just riding a wave of public discontent and fear. But it doesn’t matter. If they are trying to destroy democracy in order to initiate an authoritarian autocracy, they are well on their way, in the US in large part due to Donald Trump’s demented psychology. Lucky break for them:

Three in ten Americans now believe the nation’s system is fundamentally unsound, according to the Monmouth (“Mon-muth”) University Poll. This number has increased from prior polls while one-third of the public continues to believe voter fraud determined the outcome of the 2020 election, a finding that has been consistent over the past year. A GOP-sponsored audit of Arizona election results did more to reinforce this belief than dispel it. The poll also finds that half of Americans support greater regulation of Facebook, with majority support among most groups – except for Republicans and independents who use the platform.

Fewer than half of all Americans believe that the American system of government is basically sound and needs either no changes (8%) or some improvement (35%). The combined 43% who feel the system is basically sound is nearly identical to 44% who said the same shortly after the U.S. Capitol riot in January. Polls over the prior three years had this number higher – between 50% and 55% basically sound. An older Opinion Research Corporation poll, from which this question was taken, showed faith in the system being sound at a significantly higher level in 1980 (62%).

In the current poll, 26% say the system is not too sound and needs many improvements. This is down from 33% in January, but the shift in opinion has resulted in more rather than less negative views. Specifically, 30% feel that the American system is not sound at all and needs significant changes. This number stood at 22% in January 2021 and ranged between 21% and 24% in polls taken between 2017 and 2020. Four decades ago, only 10% of the country said the American system was not at all sound.

“The increase of distrust in the American system appears to be linked to the persistence of ‘the big lie.’ The fact that this belief continues to get oxygen is having a serious, and potentially dangerous, impact on faith in our fundamental democratic processes,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.

People who persist in seeing Trump as a somewhat benign clown, no worse than the usual president, have their heads buried in the sand. The Republican Party is ultimately responsible for this mess but they really hit the jackpot with Donald Trump. It’s hard to imagine they could have ever found anyone else as aggressively narcissistic, ignorant and pathologically dishonest, and that’s what supercharged their descent into authoritarianism. It’s here.

“A very beautiful time with extremely loving and friendly people”

That’s Trump, referring to the January 6th rally. A bunch of those loving, friendly people marched up to the Capitol to hunt down Nancy Pelosi and hang Mike Pence but he felt it was a beautiful time anyway:

Former President Donald Trump called January 6, the day of the Capitol riot, “a very beautiful time” in a March interview with ABC News correspondent Jonathan Karl, according to Karl’s forthcoming book. 

During the interview at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Trump praised the supporters who attended his speech in which he urged his loyalists to march to the Capitol and protest Congress’ certification of then-President-elect Joe Biden’s victory. 

When Karl asked Trump why he tweeted, “Remember this day forever,” hours after the deadly riot, Trump told him that Jan. 6 was “a very beautiful time with extremely loving and friendly people — the largest crowd that I’ve ever spoken before — with tremendous spirit. And I’m referring to that.” 

Trump went on, “I’m referring to when I made a speech which was perfectly fine. Some people thought it was mild-mannered …. it was a relatively mind-mannered speech.”

Karl said he wasn’t expecting Trump to express remorse for his role in inciting the deadly mob, but that he was shocked at how the former president recalled the day with pride. 

“I was taken aback by how fondly he remembers a day I will always remember as one of the darkest I have ever witnessed,” Karl writes in “Betrayal: The Final Act of the Trump Show,” an advanced copy of which was obtained by Insider. 

Trump also insisted that “the fake news” didn’t report on the large size of the crowd on the National Mall.  

“When I made that speech, it was a magnificently beautiful day,” he told Karl. “They never gave the credit to the size of the crowd when the crowd went all the way back to the Washington Monument.” 

Trump conceded that the day was “marred by what took place” after his speech. 

Even now, in spite of everything that happened, death and destruction, a riotous insurrection he’s still complaining that nobody gives him credit for his crowd size !!!!

This man is the frontrunner for the 2024 election and if the press has their way, he will win.

Why all the economic handwringing?

Personally, I blame the media which is acting as though we are in the midst of the Great Depression and people are begging in the streets. This is despite the fact that this is the best labor market for workers in many decades (which tells you something about their perspective.)

Joe Weisenthal offers some other data in his newsletter

WHY CONSUMER SENTIMENT IS CRASHING WHILE THE JOB AND STOCK MARKET ARE BOOMING

In today’s @markets newsletter I wrote about this seeming disconnect.

IMO there’s one simple reason for it and one interesting reason for it.

Basically I think it’s a combo of

1) Inflation

2) Extreme partisan polarization on all things economy

2a) The surging quits rate affecting Republican small business owners specifically.

The big question is now whether these sentiment readings actually translate into a slower economy. It’s one thing to be upset. It’s another thing to pull back on investment and consumption.

Also thanks to @pearkes for the quits chart.

Anyway, sign up for the newsletter here.

Tomorrow I’ll write about MMT or inflation or the Fed or crypto or supply chains or semiconductors or why stocks are rallying or yieldbugs

Originally tweeted by Joe Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) on November 15, 2021.

It’s could end up being a self-fulfilling prophesy. So far, the markets are ignoring the noise and continue to do well. Workers, especially at the lower levels of the pay scale, are experiencing wage increases and freedom and power they haven’t had in many years. Inflation is biting, and it freaks people out but it’s part of the hangover from the pandemic and temporarily unavoidable. Nonetheless, if you didn’t know better you’d think that the economy is in freefall and Biden’s handling of it is catastrophic.

I think the most interesting data point from Weisenthal is the partisan divide which goes a long way toward explaining what’s going on here. It would be very helpful if cable news and local news broadcasts could make that clear.

Bannon’s Dream Come True

So Steve Bannon, former Trump adviser and current podcaster, got indicted on federal charges again. Last time he was charged with defrauding desperate MAGA donors with a scam called “We Build the Wall” that siphoned off a million dollars to cover his own personal expenses. With no care for his duped followers, Donald Trump granted Bannon a full pardon on his last day as president. Now Bannon stands accused of contempt of Congress for his refusal to respond to a congressional subpoena. He turned himself into authorities today — and it’s probably one of the best days of his life.

“We’re taking down the Biden regime,” he said with a sly smile facing a camera live-streaming his surrender in front of a D.C. courthouse. Bannon went on to promote Monday’s lineup for his War Room: Pandemic podcast before addressing his followers directly: “I want you guys to stay focused and stay on message. Remember. Signal not noise. This is all noise. That’s signal.”

The bipartisan congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot subpoenaed Bannon because of the massive amounts of evidence that point to him being involved in plotting the attempted coup and his possible advanced knowledge of the insurrection. As Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Robert Costa point out in their book “Peril”: 

“Bannon told Trump to focus on January 6. That was the moment for a reckoning.

“‘People are going to go ‘What the [expletive] is going on here?’ Bannon believed. ‘We’re going to bury Biden on January 6th, [expletive] bury him.’

“If Republicans could cast enough of a shadow on Biden’s victory on January 6, Bannon said, it would be hard for Biden to govern. Millions of Americans would consider him illegitimate. They would ignore him. They would dismiss him and wait for Trump to run again.

“‘We are going to kill it in the crib. Kill the Biden presidency in the crib,’ he said.”

Sure, Trump may have persuaded himself that the election was stolen from him and believes it will be the rallying cry that will get him back to the White House in 2024. And it’s possible that Bannon had some advanced knowledge of some group like the Oath Keepers planning to invade the Capitol to stop the count. There’s no public evidence for that, however, except for his typically overwrought, macho-dude, rhetoric on his podcast the day before:

 “All hell is going to break loose tomorrow. It’s gonna be moving. It’s gonna be quick. And all I can say is strap in, the War Room, a posse. You have made this happen and tomorrow it’s game day.”

If you listen to his podcast, however, that’s how he talks about everything.

Steve Bannon may or may not have thought that Trump could strong-arm Vice President Mike Pence to go along with their daft plan to refuse to certify the electoral votes of several states and send the issue to the House which would then certify the election for Trump. If he did, he almost certainly expected that the streets would immediately be flooded with angry Democratic voters, possibly leading to confrontations with police and maybe the military. And he wouldn’t be crazy to think so. But predicting the storming of the Capitol? That’s much more of a stretch. I’m not saying he couldn’t have known of some master plan but I haven’t seen any evidence of that.

Steve Bannon is not a stupid person. I suspect his goals were less dramatic, more strategic —and possibly even more consequential. He said it right out: The Big Lie makes it hard for Biden to govern because it denies him legitimacy in the eyes of half the country. This isn’t just about restoring Trump. It’s about destroying Biden’s presidency and delegitimizing democracy. It’s about creating chaos. And Bannon’s been agitating for that for many years.

I think we all thought he had been banished from American politics once Trump kicked him to the curb after he got too much attention and bad-mouthed Trump to Michael Wolfe for his book “Fire and Fury.” Bannon tried to make himself into a kingmaker during the 2018 primaries but saw dismal results so he spent the next couple of years wandering around the world, connecting up with leaders of other authoritarian regimes, acting as something of an alt-right entrepreneur. Nothing much came of it, at least institutionally. Bannon’s ballyhooed global far-right movement he branded with an exceptionally catchy name, “The Movement,” failed to ever get off the ground. Likewise, his hopes to start a far-right Catholic political academy in an 800-year-old monastery in Italy were thwarted last March when The Council of State ruled against it after years of court battles. Bannon was designing the curriculum for the Academy for the Judeo-Christian West for Catholic activists in which, as The New Yorker’s Ben Munster put it, “a new class of right-wing ‘culture warriors’ would be trained.” Bannon told Munster that he saw it preparing the next generation of Tom Cottons, Mike Pompeos and Nikki Haleys, which sounds wholly unimaginative to me. Surely there are boatloads of young influencers and podcasters champing at the bit to get media training and learn all about  “Cultural Marxism, Radical Jihad, and the C.C.P.’s Global Information Warfare” and “The Early Church as a Business Enterprise.” 

Bannon’s philosophy has been written about quite a bit, including by yours truly, because it is extremely radical and very, very weird. It’s all wacky mysticism mixed with antediluvian, pre-enlightenment, authoritarianism posing as nationalism based upon the writings of an obscure French writer named René Guénon from the early 20th century and the teachings of one of his followers (and Mussolini adviser) Julius Evola. (If you’re interested in going deep, these articles will fill you in.) The school of thought is called “Traditionalism” and it is like no tradition you’ve ever heard of. But Bannon is not alone with this philosophy. It’s held by members of far-right leaders’ inner circles throughout Europe and in places like Brazil and Russia. If there is an intellectual rationale for Trumpism beyond the Dear Leader cult of personality, this “traditionalism” is it.

It’s hard to know if Bannon has some kind of overarching plan or if he’s just winging it. He always sounds like he knows where he’s going but he never seems to get there and his foray into defrauding MAGA followers certainly gives credence to those who say that he’s just another Trumper on the grift. But it doesn’t really matter. Bannon being a “political prisoner” martyr to the cause works for him either way. He can make a mockery of the law with his antics and potentially turn any trial into a spectacle in order to foment more chaos and disillusionment in the country while, no doubt, making a tidy profit at it. As I said, from his perspective, being indicted for defying Congress is the best thing that ever happened to him. It’s made him relevant again. 

Salon

Short fuses and short memories

Former Donald Trump advisor and “Trippie” Stephen K. Bannon is set to turn himself in to federal authorities this morning after being indicted Friday on two counts of contempt of Congress.

Already Republicans are plotting their revenge:

Many GOP leaders, however, are seizing on Bannon’s indictment to contend that Democrats are “weaponizing” the Justice Department, warning Democrats that they will go after Biden’s aides for unspecified reasons if they take back the House majority in next year’s midterm elections, as most political analysts expect.

“For years, Democrats baselessly accused President Trump of ‘weaponizing’ the DOJ. In reality, it is the Left that has been weaponizing the DOJ the ENTIRE TIME — from the false Russia Hoax to the Soviet-style prosecution of political opponents,” Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), the third-ranking House Republican, tweeted Saturday.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) suggested that Republicans would seek payback if the GOP regained control of the House, signaling that in challenging the doctrine of executive privilege, Democrats were making it easier for Republicans to force Biden’s top advisers to testify before a future GOP Congress.

Not only did the email lady not refuse to endure an 11-hour grilling by the Republicans’ Benghazi committee, but it’s unlikely anyone from the Biden administration would. It is hard to bring contempt of Congress charges against cooperating witnesses, but Jordan may try.

For Republican “hoaxers” who need their short memories refreshed, this report from late 2019:

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies during their lengthy investigation.

That group is composed of six former Trump advisers, 26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Seven of these people (including five of the six former Trump advisers) have pleaded guilty.

If you also count investigations that Mueller originated but then referred elsewhere in the Justice Department, you can add a plea deal from one more person to the list.

More short memories:

Prevagen-deficient Grassley does not remember (or conveniently forgets) that the conservative Washington Free Beacon backed by New York hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer “originally funded the research firm” (Fusion GPS) behind the Steele dossier. “Steele didn’t begin work on the project until after Democratic groups took over the funding.

This complaint comes from the same Republican Party that brought you “yellowcake uranium,” Iraqi “unmanned aerial vehicles [for dispersing] chemical or biological weapons” and targeting the United States, “high-strength aluminum tubes,” a “smoking gun…in the form of a mushroom cloud,” “mobile biological agent factories,” “yellowcake uranium,” and that the Iraq War would cost no more than $50-$60 billion and take “Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly [not] any longer than that.” And finally, that there were diabolical WMDs the administration would soon find “in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.” Kinda sorta.

Remind friends and family at Thanksgiving just who is crying “Hoax!” now.

Inconvenience-free patriotism

“During World War II many Americans, Canadians, Brits and even Australians were encouraged to plant “Victory Gardens” not only to supplement their rations but also to boost morale.” That kind of solidarity is in short supply in 2021.

High winds and power flickering here all morning. It’s Monday.

And perhaps a blue Monday for the unvaccinated, both the willing and unwilling.

The CDC reports that the unvaccinated are five times more likely to become infected with the Del;ta strain of Covid and 10 times mkore likely to need hospitalization and to die.

With hospital systems still straining to treat infections and with world economies still shaky, countries have lost patience with vaccine refuseniks.

CNN:

Austria will implement lockdown measures for all those age 12 and older who are not fully vaccinated against Covid-19 from Monday, Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg announced.

Around 65% of Austria’s population is fully vaccinated against Covid-19, one of the lower rates in the European Union where cases are surging. Under the measures announced on Sunday, the unvaccinated are ordered to stay home except for a few limited reasons; the rules will be policed by officers carrying out spot checks on those who are out.

The 10-day lockdown began at midnight local time. Protests broke out in Vienna in advance.

Austria is not alone (Axios):

  • The Singaporean government announced last Monday that it will stop covering medical bills for people who are “unvaccinated by choice” after Dec. 8.
  • The New Zealand government has announced a business vaccine mandate that affects 40% of its workforce. Businesses including hair salons, bars, and gyms must ensure all staff are vaccinated in order to operate under the upcoming order.
  • In New South Wales, Australia, unvaccinated people over the age of 16 are no longer allowed to visit another person’s residence, except in limited circumstances. 
  • Some German states have barred people who are eligible for vaccination but choose not to get it from indoor venues like restaurants and clubs, according to France 24.

In Melbourne, protests broke out over the weekend with some protesters comparing the lockdowns to Nazi tactics and calling for violence against politicians.

With the Federal Aviation Administration reporting “5,114 unruly passenger incidents, 73% of which were mask-related” and yet another passenger attack against flight crews over the weekend. Solidarity is in short supply, especially for those with short fuses.

Some of us are all about patriotism so long as it doesn’t inconvenience us.

In another dimension…

Following up on the post below about the COVID sabotage, I will offer this take on it from Brian Beutler:

As we see with the CRT episode, whether people care or not is socially determined. The Brazilian Senate accused Bolsonaro of mass murder for similar malfeasance. If leaders act like it’s a betrayal, people will see it that way.

More likely, though, they will call it a shame and move on because frontline members like Abby Spanberger want things to go back to normal.

It’s not just issuing a report calling Trump mean names. Draft legislation giving CDC officials a legal duty to warn the public in the event of a looming pandemic, so that never again can a president hide the truth from the people. Make it a priority, make Republicans vote on it.

Then keep going. Refer Trump and others to DOJ. Create a compensation fund for Americans who lost loved ones in the early days—people who went about their normal business because they didn’t know they were at risk because the president lied to them.

Intersperse it all with public hearings featuring Messonier and others who were prevented from saving lives because the stock market was more important.

Or, continue operating as a sub rosa select subcommittee, release the next batch of damning emails to the press, get two days worth of good headlines about it, then move on all over again.

Originally tweeted by Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler) on November 14, 2021.

This will not happen, of course. The congress seems unable to handle more than one or two things at the same time. They have put all their eggs in the January 6th Committee basket.

But this shows how it could be done if they wanted to. They could even create some (gasp) drama by having real live victims testifying before congress about how the administration misled them about the virus.

That would, of course, be aggressive and that’s something they want to avoid at all costs. After all, the media would say they are politicizing the virus and you wouldn’t want that.

Take a breath, people

The media’s Afghanistan hysteria has morphed seamlessly into inflation hysteria with the result that the whole country thinks the sky is falling when it isn’t. Afghanistan was entirely predictable and probably unavoidable and the overwrought coverage was not a reflection of the public’s unhappiness but the media’s happiness at being able to say they are even-handed in their critical coverage. The current inflation obsession has them downright giddy.

Here’s Dean Baker to bring a little reality to the discussion:

The October Consumer Price Index data has gotten the inflation hawks into a frenzy. And, there is no doubt it is bad news. The overall index was up 0.9 percent in the month, while the core index, which excludes food and energy, rose by 0.6 percent. Over the last year, they are up 6.2 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively. This eats into purchasing power, leaving people able to buy less with their paychecks or Social Security benefits.

While the stretch of high inflation has gone on much longer than many of us anticipated, there are still good reasons for thinking that inflation will slow sharply in the months ahead.

There is no argument about what the numbers show, but the key questions are what caused this rise in inflation and what can be done to bring it down. There are four important points to recognize:

Inflation has risen sharply in many wealthy countries, so this isn’t something that can be laid entirely on the policies of the Trump and Biden administrations.

There are good reasons for believing that many of the factors driving this inflation are temporary and will be reversed in the not too distant future.

Conventional remedies for inflation, like raising interest rates to increase unemployment, and thereby putting downward pressure on wages, are likely to prove counterproductive; and

Many people have seen increases in wages and benefits that far outweigh the impact of higher prices.

Inflation Has Risen Sharply in Many Countries, not Just the United States

On the first point, most wealthy countries have seen a substantial increase in their inflation rate in the last year, even if the current pace may not be as high as in the United States. The OECD puts Canada’s inflation rate at 4.4 percent over the last year. In Norway and Germany, the inflation rate was 4.1 percent. Some countries do have lower inflation rates. In France, the inflation rate over the last year was 2.6 percent, in Italy 2.5 percent, and in Japan, the debt king of the world, just 0.2 percent. (These data only run through September, a period in which the inflation rate for the U.S. was 5.3 percent over the prior year.)

While there are differences in inflation rates across countries, the sharp increases in places like Canada, and especially European countries like Norway and Germany, can’t be blamed in any plausible way on U.S. policies to get through and recover from the pandemic. There is also no clear relationship between the size of the rescue and recovery packages and current inflation. For example, the size of the packages in France and Japan were considerably larger than the packages put in place in Germany, yet both countries have considerably lower inflation.

The Case for This Inflation Being Temporary

In many of the areas seeing the sharpest price increases, the inflation is clearly due to factors associated with the pandemic and the reopening of the economy which are not likely to persist long into the future. The most obvious example here is new and used vehicles, the prices of which have risen over the last year by 9.8 percent and 26.4 percent, respectively.Advertisement:

These two sectors, which added more than 1.2 percentage points to the overall inflation rate over the last year, have seen sharp rises in prices due to production snags associated with a worldwide shortage of semiconductors. The latter shortage in turn results from a major semiconductor producer in Japan being temporarily sidelined by a fire. This supply reduction coincided with a big upturn in worldwide demand. Because of the pandemic, consumers in the United States and other countries shifted their consumption from services, like restaurants and movies, to goods like cars, television sets, and smartphones.

This surge in demand for goods created the backlog of containers and container ships that we are now seeing at major ports. However, we will likely work through this backlog, both because supply issues will eventually be resolved as companies arrange to hire more truck drivers and trucks, and because demand for goods will wane for the simple reason that people don’t make these purchases every month. If someone bought a car in May of 2021, they are not likely to buy another one in May of 2022.Advertisement:

It is not hard to find an example of this sort of price reversal. Television prices rose by 10.2 percent in the five months from March to August, a 26.3 percent annual rate of increase. In the last two months, they have fallen by 2.8 percent.

We can see similar stories in other areas. The price of a bushel of corn rose by more than 100 percent from its low in August of 2020 to its high in May of this year. It has since fallen back by almost 20 percent, to a price that is well below what we were seeing back in 2013. Lumber is an even more striking case. The price more than quadrupled from its low point in April of 2020 to its peak in May of this year. It has now fallen back by more than 50 percent to a price that is about 10 percent higher than a peak hit in June of 2018.

It’s not easy to determine how quickly supply chain issues will be resolved, but when they are, we are likely to see the price of a wide range of goods, starting with cars and trucks, reverse itself and start falling. This will be true not only for consumer goods but many intermediate goods that have been in short supply in recent months. The end of the backlogs is also likely to mean a reversal in shipping costs, which have risen by 11.2 percent in the last year, adding to the price of a wide range of products.Advertisement:

It is also worth noting some prices that have not risen much. The cost of medical care has risen by just 1.3 percent over the last year. The cost of college tuition is up 1.8 percent. Inflation in these former problem sectors has remained well under control through the pandemic and recovery.

Finally, it is worth mentioning the situation with rent, which accounts for almost a third of the overall CPI. We are seeing a sharp divergence in rental inflation across cities. The rent proper index was up 1.5 percent year-over-year in Boston and Los Angeles, 1.7 percent in Seattle and 0.2 percent in NYC. It was down 0.3 percent in Washington, DC and 0.4 percent in San Francisco over the last year. By contrast, it is up 6.3 percent in Detroit and 7.5 percent in Atlanta. This is consistent with people moving from high-priced cities to lower-priced ones.

The low rental inflation, or falling rents, in high-priced metro areas is obviously good news for renters there. However, the rising rents in previously low-priced areas are bad news for prior residents who may be looking at large rent increases. Even with 6.3 percent rental inflation, rents will still look cheap in Detroit for someone moving from Boston or New York.

It’s also important to remember that almost two-thirds of households are homeowners (only 44 percent for Blacks and 48 percent for Hispanics). For people who own their home, higher implicit rents are not a problem, and if the sale price goes up, as it has been doing, this is good news.

Anyhow, we may see some further increases in rental inflation in the months ahead. We have seen a large rise in home sales prices since the pandemic, which has far exceeded the rise in rents. The vacancy rate has also fallen somewhat, although the pace of new construction did pick up sharply, which should help to lower rents over time.

Will Slamming on the Brakes Cure Inflation?

The standard remedy for inflation is to deliberately slow the economy with higher interest rates from the Fed and possibly cuts in government spending and/or tax increases. The idea is that by slowing the economy and throwing people out of work, we can put downward pressure on wages, which will then mean lower prices.

There is no doubt that if we force workers to take large enough pay cuts, it will alleviate inflationary pressures, but this is a rather perverse way to accomplish the goal. With low interest rates and high demand, companies have large incentives to innovate to get around bottlenecks. It’s much better to allow the economy to work its way through a stretch of high inflation in ways that could lead to lasting productivity gains than to squeeze workers so as to alleviate cost pressures.

It’s also worth noting that many of the proposals being put forward by the Biden administration will help to alleviate inflationary pressures in both the long term and the short term. In the latter category, universal pre-K and increased access to childcare will make it easier for many parents, primarily women, to enter the labor force or to work more hours.

In the longer-term category, increased access to broadband and improving our transportation infrastructure will increase our capacity in many areas. Also, money spent to protect against the effects of climate change will reduce the disruptions caused by extreme weather events in the future.

This is a much more promising path for dealing with inflation than forcing workers to take pay cuts.

Keeping Score on Inflation

There have been several pieces in major news outlets in the last week telling people how inflation has been devastating for low- and moderate-income families. While it is undoubtedly hard for many families to pay more for food and other necessities, it is important to keep an eye on the income side of the equation.

In the case of families who have children, the vast majority are receiving the expanded child tax credit. Before the American Recovery Act (ARA), the credit was $2,000, but only partially refundable. This meant that many low- and moderate-income families only received $1,400 per child. Under the ARA, these families are receiving $3,000 per child and $3,600 for every child under the age of six. This is a big gain in income for a family with an income of $20,000 or $30,000. (There are families that don’t get the credit. This includes undocumented workers who are not eligible and others who are excluded because of bureaucratic obstacles. These are important issues, but unrelated to the problem of inflation.)Advertisement:

There also have been sharp increases in wages for workers at the bottom end of the pay ladder. Restaurant workers have seen their pay rise by $1.84 an hour over the last year. This would come to an increase of $3,680 for a full-year, full-time worker.

These increases in income would dwarf the rise in food costs that have featured prominently in news accounts on inflation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics puts the weight of food in a household’s budget at 7.4 percent. Suppose we double this for moderate-income families and make it 15 percent. For a family that spends $30,000 a year, that comes to $4,500 a year. If we apply the estimated 4.5 percent rate of food inflation over the last year, the higher prices will take a bit more than $200 out of this family’s pockets.

That is less than 10 percent of the pay increases that we expect low-paid workers to be receiving or the gains from the child tax credit for families with kids. If we’re going to talk about the well-being of these families it is incredibly irresponsible to only talk about the spending side of the ledger and ignore the income side.       Advertisement:

Conclusion: Team Transitory Is Not Throwing in the Towel

While the stretch of high inflation has gone on much longer than many of us anticipated, there are still good reasons for thinking that inflation will slow sharply in the months ahead. We have seen the prices of many items, like television sets and lumber, reverse and fall sharply after prior run-ups. It is likely that many other items, like cars and meat, will be in this category in the near future.

For what it’s worth, it seems that financial markets also agree with this assessment. The interest rate on 10-year Treasury bonds is only 1.56 percent, well below the pre-pandemic level. That is not consistent with a story where markets expect 4 or 5 percent inflation in coming years.

Also, contrary to gloom and doom predictions, the dollar has been rising in value against the euro and other currencies. That is also not consistent with a belief that the U.S. is facing a wage-price spiral.

Financial markets can be wrong, as those of us who predicted the collapse of the stock and housing bubbles know well. But for now at least, they seem to be in agreement with the analysis from Team Transitory.

Here’s hoping that Team Transitory is right and the media can move on to another horror story hangover of the Trump years to pin on Biden. I’m going to guess it will be the return of COVID this winter. That has to be Biden’s fault too right?