Skip to content

Month: November 2021

Good for Beto

I’m not sure what he’s up to, but I admire him for sticking to his … uhm … guns on this issue:

Democratic Texas gubernatorial candidate Beto O’Rourke on Sunday said he stands by his controversial 2019 comment that “we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47.”

Asked by co-host Dana Bash on CNN’s “State of the Union” if he would stand by his vow if elected governor of Texas, O’Rourke said, “I still hold this view.”

“Look, we are a state that has a long, proud tradition of responsible gun ownership. And most of us here in Texas do not want to see our friends, our family members, our neighbors shot up with these weapons of war. So, yes, I still hold this view,” O’Rourke said.

While running for president in 2019, O’Rourke defended his proposed mandatory buyback of assault-style weapons during a Democratic primary debate. 

“Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47,” he told a crowd at the time. “We’re not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore.”

The gubernatorial candidate on Sunday went on to say that Texans have told him that they are concerned about the bill Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) signed over the summer that allows for concealed carry without a permit in the state.

“We don’t want extremism in our gun laws. We want to protect the Second Amendment. We want to protect the lives of our fellow Texans. And I know that when we come together and stop this divisive extremism that we see from Greg Abbott right now, we’re going to be able to do that,” he said.

They are weapons of war and they have no place in a civilized society. The gun fetishists like to run around with these things to present a cartoon macho image and end up killing people with them. It’s literally insane.

It’s hard to see how O’Rourke can win Texas saying he wants to outlaw their favorite toy, but it’s refreshing to see someone in his position adhere to his principles. And maybe he knows something about Texas that I don’t know. I admit that the state somewhat mystifies me.

He’s Not Done

I wish I understood this:

A few…developments in recent weeks point to the early stirrings of a Republican Party in which Trump is sidelined. Glenn Youngkin’s recent victory in the Virginia governor’s race demonstrated that a Republican candidate could win in a battleground state without yoking himself to Trump. Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, now making the rounds to promote a new book that counters Trump’s claim that he won the 2020 election, signaled that he might run for the 2024 GOP nomination whether or not Trump enters the race. A poll last month offered encouraging news for Florida Governor Ron DeSantis in New Hampshire, the state that traditionally holds the first primary contest of the presidential-election season.

Youngkin — who eked out a monumental 1.9 % win — was endorsed by Trump and while he didn’t fervently embrace him, he certainly didn’t reject him either. (Also, Virginia always votes for the out party for Governor.) Chris Christie has twisted himself into a distorted Auntie Em’s cheese covered pretzel trying to stay on Trump voters’ good side (and keep Fox Happy) while feebly attempting to separate himself from the man himself. Ron DeSantis is Trump 2.0. And if he rejects Dear Leader, the blowback is going to be fierce.

GOP Governors may be trying to separate themselves from Trump but the national party is superglued to the man and will remain so unless he is either incapacitated or dead. Because he is running:

The only reason he hasn’t announced is because of campaign finance rules that would require him to curtail some of his grift. But he will. He can hardly contain himself.

If people think he’s somehow losing his grip on the party, good luck.

Money, money, money, money

It is certainly true that not everything comes down to money, humans are complicated and are motivated by many influences. But it isn’t nothing. In fact, it’s a huge factor in politics and we’ve gone out of our way in recent years to empower it even more with loose laws designed to give vastly wealthy players (who benefit massively from laws that enable them to gobble up more and more of the earth’s wealth) more and more power.

There’s a lot of rot in our political system, but this is right at the heart of it:

Efforts to overturn the election. Jan. 6 organizers. White supremacist groups. And more than a dozen private and public universities. They all have one thing in common: They received anonymous funding funneled through a single conservative dark money behemoth.

That’s the news in the latest IRS filing from Donors Trust—a conservative, Koch-aligned nonprofit which does not need to reveal the names of its donors and has been called the “dark money ATM of the right.”

The disclosure, first obtained by CNBC, shows the group channeled major support for entities which fought to overturn President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory and organized the Jan. 6 rallies in Washington, D.C.

Donors Trust also gave more than $2 million to groups linked to white supremacists, including the VDARE Foundation.

Norm Eisen, a government ethics expert and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, analyzed the filing with colleagues and remarked that it was “profoundly concerning for the future of our democracy.”

“The Donors Trust is taking advantage of the dangerous opacity of our tax and related laws and regulations to fund alleged white supremacist and white nationalist associated groups, those who were bad actors in wrongly attempting to spread misinformation about or overturn the legitimate 2020 election results, and even groups that were responsible for the rally that helped trigger the Jan. 6 insurrection,” he told The Daily Beast.

But the same vehicle that quietly fuels white supremacist rhetoric also fanned money out to major educational institutions, including state public schools like the University of Texas, Virginia Tech, Michigan State University, and Florida State University. Leading private colleges like Georgetown, Vanderbilt, and a conservative think tank headquartered at Brown University also drew anonymous support.

At the same time, the fund shipped millions of dollars to right-wing organizations agitating for education reform, including to groups pushing unfounded fears about critical race theory.

The Donors Trust primarily funds right-leaning, libertarian, and free-market advocates. It describes itself as “a charitable savings account”—a go-between that allows wealthy donors to deposit money in lump sums, where it gets invested at tax-free growth. They can later direct contributions at any time while remaining anonymous.

People think that the anonymity is the problem and it surely doesn’t help. But honestly, I don’t think the electorate is sophisticated enough to care if some rich people are backing causes they don’t like and, in any case, there seems to be very little they can do about it. Some donors don’t want to be shunned by other rich people for donating to right wing causes but honestly, I don’t think it would make much difference if they were exposed. They’d find a way.

After decades of campaign finance reform we have very little to show for it. Even blatant defiance of the weak laws we have rarely result in any accountability for political players much less for donors.

Asked about the money raised for white supremacist and anti-democratic groups, Donors Trust president and CEO Lawson Bader provided a statement touting the fund’s financial success, claiming the organizations they support are “worthy causes” and that the donations “serve the public good.”

“2020 was a year of great uncertainty and change. Despite this, donors stepped up to support public charities, especially those embroiled in alleviating and addressing the vast economic and health challenges facing the country,” the statement said. “Many account holders held ‘rainy day’ charitable funds in their respective accounts, which made it possible for many to extend their generosity and serves as a reminder about the essential nature of donor-advised fund providers during times of crisis.”

Bader, who pulled a $390,000 salary in 2020, said the $186 million distributed last year was “to serve the public good.” He claimed the group has, since its 2001 inception, “distributed more than $1.5 billion to thousands of worthy causes and institutions focused on science, medicine, religion, public policy, the arts, civics and health.”

A representative from a public relations firm that serves the company told The Daily Beast that the organization exists to give legitimate groups “a seat at the table” and “not to advance any cause,” including “those they may disagree with.”

But that appears to contradict with the mission statement on the group’s IRS filing, which states that its purpose is “to promote liberty through limited government, personal responsibility, and free enterprise by providing financial support to other publicly supported charities that share in its purpose.”

It is unclear from Bader’s statement which goals the Donors Trust organization shares with some of its “worthy causes,” including groups that have been associated with white identity and white supremacist movements, like VDARE, Young Americans for Liberty, and the New Century Foundation.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, VDARE, which received $70,000 last year and nearly $2 million in 2019, “regularly publishes articles by white supremacists.” YAL, which received $1.3 million through Donors Trust in 2020, has been affiliated with the white nationalist and the neo-Nazi organization Identity Evropa. The group removed its president after multiple women leveled allegations of sexual assault in January. And another $600,000 went to the New Century Foundation, which SPLC, the Anti-Defamation League, and academics consider a white supremacist group.

The Donor Trust’s self-described efforts to “serve the public good” included bankrolling an array of groups which challenged the 2020 election and seeded unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud. Those organizations received nearly $10 million in anonymous cash last year, according to an analysis of the filing.

Two of those entities played key roles in the events surrounding Jan. 6. One of them, the Tea Party Patriots, was listed as a rally organizer and received $250,000. The second, Turning Point—the right-wing youth group run by Charlie Kirk—provided buses to D.C. and participated in the “March to Save America” ahead of the event. Turning Point groups took in a total $780,000 from trust contributions in 2020.

Articles on the VDARE website also rejected Donald Trump’s loss and “cheered on” the rioters.

Sure, it was a grassroots uprising — with a little help from their friends, the vastly wealthy mega-donors who just happen to think that authoritarian autocracy is “a public good.”

Money can’t unilaterally make this happen. Or at least it couldn’t. Now that they are financing the destruction of our election processes, they might just be able to get it done.

Oh look

As far as I know, this didn’t come up on the Sunday shows. And that means the media sees it as old news and they will not make any effort to get this news out beyond these perfunctory stories from last week. Every Democrat who goes on TV has to be saying this over and over like a mantra.

I get the sense that Biden, being an old fellow with a lot of life experience, believes that the current economic crises will right themselves since they are caused by external, specific circumstances to the pandemic so he’s just got his head down and plowing forward with his plans. The problem, of course, is that people get ideas in their heads that are very difficult to supplant, especially in an ugly time like the current one. It may not matter if the economy improves, particularly if the media insists on telling the “failure” story in their ongoing attempt to be “fair and balanced” in their coverage after the disaster of the Trump presidency.

I hope people will get a new sense of optimism (or at least relief) once we get through this last mile of COVID crisis but the whole world seems kind of dark right now and I don’t know if that’s going to change any time soon.

Mr and Ms Popular

With the banks and Wall St anyway:

Over the summer, as he was working to scale back President Biden’s domestic agenda, Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia traveled to an $18 million mansion in Dallas for a fund-raiser that attracted Republican and corporate donors who have cheered on his efforts.

In September, Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, who along with Mr. Manchin has been a major impediment to the White House’s efforts to pass its package of social and climate policy, stopped by the same home to raise money from a similar cast of donors for her campaign coffers.

Even as Ms. Sinema and Mr. Manchin, both Democrats, have drawn fire from the left for their efforts to shrink and reshape Mr. Biden’s proposals, they have won growing financial support from conservative-leaning donors and business executives in a striking display of how party affiliation can prove secondary to special interests and ideological motivations when the stakes are high enough.

Ms. Sinema is winning more financial backing from Wall Street and constituencies on the right in large part for her opposition to raising personal and corporate income tax rates. Mr. Manchin has attracted new Republican-leaning donors as he has fought against much of his own party to scale back the size of Mr. Biden’s legislation and limit new social welfare components.

It is not unusual for well-heeled political activists and business interests to spread a smattering of cash across party lines. Representative Liz Cheney, Republican of Wyoming, collected a handful of checks from major Democratic donors this year as she bucked her party leadership’s defense of former President Donald J. Trump.

But the stream of cash to the campaigns of Ms. Sinema and Mr. Manchin from outside normal Democratic channels stands out because many of the donors have little history with them. The financial support is also notable for how closely tied it has been to their power over a single piece of legislation, the fate of which continues to rest largely with the two senators because their party cannot afford to lose either of their votes in the evenly divided Senate.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more perfect example of Big Moneys influence in our politics. There it is, for all to see. And the results speak for themselves:

Their influence has been profound. The domestic policy bill, which would expand the social safety net and efforts to fight climate change, started out at $3.5 trillion and has been shrunk — mainly at the insistence of Mr. Manchin — to around $2 trillion; it could get smaller as the Senate takes up the version passed on Friday by the House. New spending measures were originally to have been paid for mostly through tax-rate increases on the wealthy and corporations — a component of the plan that had to be substantially rewritten because of Ms. Sinema’s opposition.

The Big Money Boyz sure gon their moneys worth didn’t they?

If Manchin runs again (and he might not — he’ll be in his late 70s) he’ll win no matter what. But Sinema is going to be a test case for whether or not you can totally betray your base and still win re-election. I suspect she probably can, unfortunately. But it’s not going to be easy for her.

Old-fashioned in a good way

For all the negativity and serious challenges (and threats) ahead, a part of me is nostalgic for the America of the early 1960s when anything was still possible. At Crooks & Liars I reminisced once about a childhood trip west out Route 66:

Beside Route 66 and elsewhere, Eisenhower’s Interstate Highway System – the vast system of roads most of us take for granted – was taking shape from border to border and from coast to coast. It was a national project worthy of a great nation. The country was on the move.

Astronaut Alan Shepard was a national hero … America was going to the moon by the end of the decade. We needed scientists and engineers and new technologies. Between the G.I. Bill and government-backed student loans, America was making it more affordable than ever to get an education. It was good for you. It was good for your community. It was good for all of U.S.

President Joe Biden keeps invoking that spirit: “In America, anything is possible.” And over and over: “Look, we’re the United States of America. There’s nothing — not a single thing — we’re unable to do if we do it together.

Last week again: “In America, we’ve always believed anything is possible. Anything is possible. We’ve got to reestablish that spirit. We’ve got to reestablish that sense of who we are. There’s no limit to what our people can do. There’s no limit to what our nation can do. If you think about this thing, it’s never been a good bet to bet against America.” 

It sounds hackneyed and corny, like something old-fashioned your grandfather (or great-grandfather) might say. Biden admits people will get tired of hearing him say it. But I wonder if he isn’t onto something.

Democrats suck at message discipline. We all know it. They can never find a message that’s “sticky,” that supporters will repeat and carry into the community for them. Part of that is because lefties won’t repeat messages because it feels trite and unoriginal for people as smart as themselves. They won’t stay on message even if they have one. And when they try, they sound like they’re trying.

As forced and contentless as Biden’s “Build Back Better” framing is, his “anything is possible” boosterism sounds genuine and natural for him. If he repeats it enough, people might actually begin to believe it again. Some of us actually want to.

Dan Pfeiffer considers how Democrats might promote an economic message that’s actually sticky. Because despite historic progress on the economy, an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found “7 in 10 adults, including almost half of Democrats, believe the nation is headed in the wrong direction, as well as nearly 60 percent who view Biden’s stewardship of the economy negatively just nine months into his presidency.”

Don’t ignore people’s frustration or try to talk them out of it with macro-economic date, Pfeiffer warns.

At the bottom of Barack Obama’s polling in 2011,

The public fumed over the economy and directed this anger towards the president with little more than a year before reelection. While we hoped the economy would improve before the voters decided Obama’s fate, we knew we had few levers left to pull and even less control. As we charted out our political strategy, one specific metric in our internal polling focused on jobs. The public considered job creation the most important issue and believed Obama wasn’t sufficiently focused on the concern. With this strategy in mind, we decided to measure our success based on whether we could increase the number of people who believed Obama was focused on jobs. The goal was to get caught trying.

“One can actually get points for trying,” Pfeiffer suggests. “The voters want to know you are fighting for them.” Biden should make clear he is. Again and again.

But he cannot be the hero of the story without there being a villain.

Pfeiffer writes:

This isn’t a positive statement about our country, but the long arc of American politics is largely focused on anger management. In tough times, Americans go looking for someone to blame for economic distress. Republicans succeed when that blame is directed downwards towards poor people, immigrants, and the unemployed. Think of Ronald Reagan’s demagoguery of “welfare queens” and Donald Trump’s attacks on immigrants. Democrats succeed when the public rightfully understands corporate greed and irresponsibility are to blame. 

Polls support that people already believe that and that Republicans more so than Democrats are the party of big business. Meantime, Republicans have “laid back, hoping no one remembered” that they advocate “corporate tax cuts paid for by cutting Medicare and Social Security.” With Democrats holding all the levers of power, Pfeiffer says, the media “is not incentivized to focus their limited attention on the Republicans.” Democrats have to remind people “that Republicans are an unacceptable alternative.” He suggests this:

Republicans are blocking bipartisan measures to lower your childcare, healthcare, and prescription drug costs because they refuse to ask a single corporation to pay a single penny more in taxes.

Fine, but where’s the contrast with Democrats? Touting economic figures alone won’t convince voters things are looking up. Democrats have to toot their own horns in ways that will feel unnatural until they don’t. They have to begin with their own accomplishments, pivot to how corporate-aligned Republicans mean to keep average people from getting the help they need, and then remind Americans that more is possible if they — what was it George W. Bush said? — stay the course.

Do it often enough and loud enough and maybe Americans will actually start believing it.

Is this what the 1850s was like?

2015 Image of Fort Sumter taken from the tour boat.
Photo:NPS/Taormina

After last week’s events, I was all in the mood to give a Sunday sermon. Then John Pavlovitz reposted one of his from April. He was trying to get a sense of the nation’s mental health after a year in isolation:

I’ve tried to put my finger on how I’m feeling lately, how I think so many of us are feeling out there.

It isn’t outrage. We’ve been there for a while now if we’ve been paying attention at all.
It isn’t anger. That’s familiar territory for people whose eyes have been open to the ugliness.
It’s isn’t grief. We have collectively and individually mourned for years at this point.

It’s something else. I think it’s exhaustion.

I sense a corporate emotional weariness in kind people these days, the accumulated scar tissue created when you’ve absorbed more bad news, predatory behavior, and  attacks on decency than your reserves can manage. Sustained cruelty will do that to the human soul.

There’s only so much contempt for humanity our minds are able to process, until one day something snaps and we lose the ability to respond with the same urgency and resilience we once had.  A low-grade hopelessness sets in, slowly replacing our activism with apathy and one day rendering us immobile: cruelty sickness.

Prolonged exposure to this kind of seemingly tireless barbarism begins to rob us of energy, to dishearten us to the point that we stop caring and opt out. This is of course, by design. That is what those manufacturing this incessant enmity are counting on.

The fatigue of decent humans is the plan: inundate us with a million tiny crises, assail us with countless daily culture war battles, and batter us with endless legislative assaults—until we are gradually but decidedly crushed beneath the weight of it all. Eventually, we succumb to the numerous wounds of their boundless hatred, the suffering of those they victimize, and a steady stream of the unanswerable questions about how and why human beings can be this perpetually cruel.

Maybe it’s a bit of necessary resting after the the last four ferocious years, perhaps an understandable emotional letdown afforded by the arrival of an adult human president and the feeling that we are not in a continual state of imminent threat from our government, or maybe it’s the welcome distraction of passing through the worst of a brutal year in isolation—but it feels as though our collective passions are waning and we cannot afford this.

Pavlovitz goes on to urge that we reconnect with community and let it renew our strength.

I’ve been trying to do that, deliberately, with people I haven’t spoken with for some time.

There was a local party meeting Saturday morning the second in-person affair in 20 months. Even masked, it was good to see people I had not seen in that long. I spent over an hour on the phone with a colleague Saturday afternoon reviewing recent political developments. It was soothing to hear her voice on the line.

Only a handful of local restaurants in this tourist town are open to the vaccinated only. They check. After a takeout-only year followed by a summer of beer served in plastic cups outside at picnic tables, we can now — safely — eat indoors at our neighborhood brew pub and have a beer in a proper glass. It feels almost normal and like early Christmas. A neighborhood attorney I hadn’t seen in a couple of years gave a thumbs-up from across the room last night, smiled, and asked if he was late for the Republican meeting.

The fatigue and emotional beat-down cannot win. Pavlovitz suggests, “We fill in the gaps among us, and we let those of us who feel strong enough today to engage the fight for those who need to catch their breathe and renew their strength.”

Old times there are not forgotten

I wonder these days if this is what the 1850s felt like.

“There is nothing more frightening in America today than an angry White man,” writes Baltimore native CNN’s John Blake:

There is nothing inherently violent about White men, or any human being.

But recent events have convinced me it’s time to put another character on trial: A vision of White masculinity that allows some White men to feel as if they “can rule and brutalize without consequence.”

This angry White man has been a major character throughout US history. He gave the country slavery, the slaughter of Native Americans, and Jim Crow laws. His anger also helped fuel the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol.

And he fought like the devil to preserve slavery, to undo Reconstruction, and to enforce Jim Crow for 100 years. His flag-waving and pocket Constitutions cannot conceal that his commitment to preserving this republic as a democratic one is merely cosmetic.

There is some scary shit on the horizon. More menace and more threats. We’ve touched on it here, and here, as well as here, here, here, and here.

What the angry White man counts on is that the rest of us will not see that his bluster and sidearms are there to conceal his deep insecurity. That HE is the one who is more scared. If we falter, the country does. So, take a breath, shake it off, and do not falter.

Ecstatic extremists

There’s nothing you can do about it…

As soon as the jury announced its verdict, online extremist spaces erupted in cheers and self-congratulatory rhetoric. Supporters heralded the Rittenhouse verdict as a victory for the principle of self-defense and providing legal precedent for violent responses to perceived threats, and some argued that people no longer need to avoid acting during tense situations for fear of legal repercussions, a potentially dangerous development.

After one user on Patriots.win wrote, “Antifags and BLMKKK gotta be shitting. We have permission to defend ourselves now,” [sic] another responded, “We don’t need fucking permission and never did. But now, it’s a legal precedent.”

One boogalooer on Twitter wrote: “WE CAN PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES NOW REFERENCING RITTENHOUSE V. Wisconsin.”

On TelegramQAnon John wrote, “This case is a MAJOR turning point in the quest for JUSTICE in our country. Especially in terms of the 2nd Amendment, and self-defense cases moving forward…The precedent set in this trial will be one that is revisited, and referenced for the unseeable future.”

Also on Telegram, Aaron Chapman, the leader of the neo-Nazi group the Occidental Templars, praised the verdict as giving “good Americans legal precedent and license to kill violent commies without worrying about doing life in prison if we defend ourselves in a riot. This will also show militia types that they don’t have to avoid the riots to protect themselves legally.”

One user in the Proud Boys public chatroom on Telegram shared an image of the snake from the Gadsden flag biting the fist from the antifa logo with the caption “YOU WERE WARNED.” Beneath it, the user wrote, “#Kyle #FAFO” (“FAFO” stands for “Fuck around and find out.”)

Some in extremist circles saw the verdict as permission to use violence against their “enemies.”

The neo-Nazi Nationalist Social Club wrote on Telegram, “Report any and all Communist activity in the New England area in the wake of the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict to:” and then provided their contact information.

On Telegram, white supremacist Brien James posted, “Who wants to go clear out the scum clogging up those court house steps?”

Said one MeWe user in the group “Warriors for America (Oath Keepers): “Now pussies shoot them rioting looting criminal animals when they fuck around! Open season on lib trash commies!”

On Telegram, members of the virulently antisemitic Goyim Defense League responded by writing, “Let’s fucking go!! Defend your streets,” and “I hope all these boomer bitches get out there and get their kyle on”.

In addition to praising the verdict, some posters are attempting to capitalize on the trial by advertising their groups and encouraging action.

The Secretary of the white supremacist National Justice Party wrote, “This is a good time to reflect on the fact that our enemies don’t control everything and they haven’t won yet…Our enemies are evil Jewish child rapists, like the devil Kyle Rittenhouse exterminated in self-defense, so we have nothing to fear from the truth and from the honest judgment of the people. The enemy knows this, which is why they use…dishonest, underhanded means of preventing us from being heard.”  

The Texas chapter of White Lives Matter wrote, “As far as the media is concerned, Kyle is a White & should have let those anti-Whites murder him for being White. This would have never been a case in a White nation…Do not use this as an excuse to relax, we are still being genocided, raped & erased daily.”

Meanwhile, the Ohio chapter of White Lives Matters posted messages on Telegram, which were also shared by a chapter of the National Socialist Club, that called for racial action. In one post, they write, “DO YOU SEE, WHITE MAN? We still have power…We all know the riots that are about to take place. Will you wait until the rioters show up at your door, or will you join us and create a front line.”

In some spaces, the responses included explicit antisemitism:

One Proud Boys Telegram channel included the post, “Kyle is already suiting up to patrol jews tonight during the riots,” and “INFINITE SIEG FUCKING HEILS. HAIL RITTENHAUS.”

A white supremacist on Telegram shared a meme of Judge Bruce Schroeder with the caption “Sorry kikes. Better luck next time.”

Another white supremacist on Telegram responded to the news by writing, “Fuck those dead Jews! Hail Kyle!”

Members of the Goyim Defense League cheered on the verdict with “Sieg Kyle.”

There are many people who now believe it is open season on their enemies. All they have to do is say they were scared and they’re good to go. And they know it.

*Keep in mind, however, that if it’s a leftist or a BLM supporter who tries this they will be gunned down by the cops. That’s what happened in Portland when the Rittenhouse corollary happened. This is a wingnut “get out of jail free” card only.

And they know it:

On Friday, NPR reported that extreme right groups are rejoicing at the acquittal of Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse — and are fantasizing about instigating more violence in their private channels.

“In one Telegram channel for the far-right Proud Boys, some noted they had taken the day off work to await the verdict,” reported Odette Yousef. “‘There’s still a chance for this country,’ wrote one. In another channel, a member stated that political violence must continue. ‘The left wont stop until their bodie(s) get stacked up like cord wood,’ he wrote.”

Patriotic grift

I’m just going to leave this here for you to enjoy:

Lol:

In the early, wild days of the Trump administration, Gorka had a plum job alongside Steve Bannon in the White House, where he advised the president on national security. He lost that gig two years ago and decamped for the conservative speaking circuit and a radio show.

But now he’s got a new gig: hawking fish oil pills in a TV ad, according to Mediaite. He used to suffer from back pain, he says, but now he’s been miraculously cured, thanks to Relief Factor.

“Sebastian Gorka here for Relief Factor,” he says in the ad. “First of all, let me say I have never before endorsed a pain reliever, but when Pete and Seth Tablott, the father-and-son owners of Relief Factor, asked me to endorse their 100 percent drug-free product, I absolutely couldn’t say no.”

Gorka waged a long war with journalism over his “Dr.” honorific. He’s got a PhD in political science from Corvinus University of Budapest, and has requested that media outlets use the “Dr.” prefix when they refer to him. Most major media outlets generally only use that prefix for medical doctors.

Well, now Gorka is, in a sense, a step closer to being an actual doctor. He’s claiming on TV that, for the low, low price of $19.95, you, too, can be free of chronic pain, thanks to Relief Factor.

He’s not the first person in the Trump administration to take an, ahem, unusual position after leaving their government post. Sean Spicer, Trump’s first press secretary, is now dancing with the stars.

Nor is Gorka the only conservative figure to hawk questionable health supplements or products. Alex Jones has a store full of them on his website, and Ben Shapiro will happily sell you a store of emergency rations to help you prepare for a disaster.

Gorka’s not even the first Republican figure to peddle Relief Factor. Pat Boone, the 1950s singer who earned himself a lifetime achievement award from the Conservative Political Action Committee in 2011 while he was trafficking in conspiracy theories about former president Barack Obama’s citizenship status, did a spot for the fish oil pills too.

Hey, a fascist’s gotta make a living, amirite?