Skip to content

Month: March 2022

Bear witness

https://twitter.com/justinjm1/status/1504065755524079623

If you read nothing else about the horrors of Ukraine, read that AP story. And look hard at the pictures.

President Zelensky gave this speech today before the US Congress:

Former State Department official and current congressman Tom Malinowski had this to say about that, which I totally agree with:

I think NATO and the west are quite happy for them to do this. It’s useful for them as well as Ukraine. It gives them the excuse they need domestically to take in refugees and pour vast sums of money into military and humanitarian aid. It also gives them a rationale for shoring up their eastern borders.

Zelensky understands that a no-fly zone requires that American and other NATO air forces take out air defenses on the ground in Ukraine and in Russia in order to make it work. If that happens there is every reason to believe Russia considers it an act of war and the risk of nuclear engagement suddenly grows exponentially. Ukraine will be ground zero if that happens. But making the plea on a daily basis is a way of pushing hard for everything else and I’m quite sure everyone involved is on the same page.

This situation is insanely tragic as you can see from that AP report. There are no easy answers. But so far, I think the west has risen to the occasion, which includes not succumbing to the emotional need to “do something” when the risks of global catastrophe are so high. We just have to continue to get them everything they need materially, stay unified and hope that Putin realizes that he’s made a huge strategic error and finds a way to withdraw.

Hard core idiocy

Courtesy of Roy Edroso’s newsletter (one of my favorites and you should subscribe if you do that sort of thing) here’s one example of what the right wing is spreading around among themselves in order to keep the outrage machine at fever pitch and the money flowing in:

STATE AGENTS RAID PRESCHOOLS, GRILL TODDLERS WITHOUT PARENTAL CONSENT (Steadfast Clash)

There was a lot of doubt surrounding many of the mandates that originated from the COVID pandemic. As the pandemic that killed hundreds of thousands of Americans wanes, the truth is becoming clear. Most of the mandates were bureaucratic power grabs by fearful politicians.

Over two years and a million dead — mostly in red states where masks and vaccines are for liberal sissies — and the one thing we’ve learned is that vaccines and masks are for liberal sissies.

… From early in the pandemic, masks were little more than political theater. It’s sad, because these masks have damaged our children. The full extent of this damage created by hiding human emotions and curtailing emotional development may not be fully realized for decades.

We have no proof of this, but we bet years from now, when we get some real scientists up in here like Stella Immanuel, it’ll turn out wearing a mask was worse than catching COVID, and we will curse Sleepy Joe’s name even more than we do now!

…In California, another state full of tyrannical liberal leaders, officials took it a step further. California is attacking preschoolers like an inquisition.

That’s a little harsh. State agency people went to Aspen Leaf preschool and talked to the kids about masking without a “familiar adult” present. Even the unfriendly Voices of San Diego reports that “child care licensing investigators do have the authority to interview children in isolated settings” though “many Aspen Leaf parents said they believed such tactics were meant to be used in extreme cases, like alleged child abuse.”

My own memory of early school years is full of “unfamiliar” adults such as substitute teachers and nurses and other kids’ parents talking to me. My Mom couldn’t give a shit. You know why? Because that’s what school is. Or was, anyway — maybe now they send teachers out to kids’ neighborhoods weeks in advance to insinuate them into their lives so the kids don’t have a Stranger Danger freakout when they get to school, I don’t know.

But news of this “raid” has spread through the rightwing disinfo journals like tales of swarthy Cubans strip-searching women before the Spanish-American War, and the Steadfast Clash correspondent is particularly inflamed:

…When will Americans draw the line? What will the next reason be for encroaching on freedom?

This is more dangerous than one might think. The next step is a Marxist-style society where the government can do what they want to whomever they like. If Americans continue to allow these types of things to happen, we will soon regret it.

Stirring words, but for some reason this just made me think of all the videos I’ve seen of black kids getting thrown around by cops, so I couldn’t get with it.

I thought of that too. And it’s also quite interesting in terms of what Trump 2.0 has been doing down in Florida — banning schools from implementing mandates, telling them what they are and aren’t allowed to teach, even in colleges, banning businesses from doing any diversity training that might make someone feel bad about themselves, refusing to allow businesses to require masks and vaccines. They’ve even deployed the Texas-style vigilante legal method to keep teachers from discussing LGBT issues in school, with plenty of wriggle room to carry it all the way into high school. I don’t know about you, but that sure sounds like the government encroaching on freedom to me.

I also remembered the people marching in Charlottesville chanting “Jews will not replace us” and cheering the GOP president Donald Trump at meetings and I also recalled the storming of the US Capitol with people chanting (these folks do a lot of chanting) “Hang Mike Pence” and rioters screaming “tell that cunt Nancy Pelosi we’re coming for her!” So talking to little kids about mask wearing doesn’t strike me as a comparable authoritarian threat. I guess your mileage may vary but I honestly don’t know why.

There are more examples of this kind of right wing lunacy in Edroso’s newsletter’s regular feature, This is Hard Core. Nobody does it better.

The eeriest data point

Of all the graphs & charts I’ve done over the past couple of years, that one includes the single eeriest coincidental data point.

(By “coincidental” I don’t mean the overall pattern, I mean the fact that the crossover happened on that EXACT date as opposed to a week or two earlier or later.)

The crossover date does shift around a bit if you use the reddest/bluest 20% or 30%, but at 10%, which is what I’ve been using in a lot of my work, it’s right on the nose.

For those wondering, on 1/20/21, the official cumulative COVID death rate in both the reddest and bluest tenths of the U.S. was right around 138.4 per 100K residents (roughly 45,800 apiece).

And yes, the exact date itself is a coincidence—the narrowing trend clearly started around mid-July 2020 as the blue urban centers had gotten things under control while the red rural areas weren’t doing much of anything and Trump was holding his massive superspreader rallies.

Originally tweeted by Charles Gaba 🇺🇦 (@charles_gaba) on March 16, 2022.

The date may be a coincidence but the data aren’t. You all know why it happened. And it was utterly senseless.

We are about to have another surge which is depressing since we just came out of the last one. But it is what it is. If the data coming from around the world where OMICRON B is surging holds up it means that our vaccinations should mitigate the worst of it. But if you are over 60 or you or members of your family have any medical vulnerability, you’d better wear your mask and wear it right. A whole lot of people won’t do you the favor of wearing one so you’ll have to be extra careful.

And it looks like 4th boosters are probably on the horizon. I hope they ok them soon enough that waning immunity from the first 3 doesn’t kill a whole bunch of us for no reason.

Fasten your seatbelts.

He just can’t quit Vlad

On Tuesday, President Vladimir Putin slapped back at the United States’ sanctions on Russia and various Russian oligarchs by putting what he called a “stop list” on 13 Americans. The list includes President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley and White House press secretary Jen Psaki among other members of the Biden administration. Putin also put former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the list as well as Biden’s son Hunter, neither of whom are in the current government or hold any official job. Curiously, Putin failed to name even one Republican. How odd?

Responding to a question about this during the daily press briefing, Psaki said, “it won’t surprise any of you that none of us are planning tourist trips to Russia, none of us have bank accounts that we won’t be able to access, so we will forge ahead.” Unsurprisingly, Republicans had little to say about it. Well, except for one. Former President Donald Trump was jubilant:

“Breaking News: Russia just sanctioned Joe Biden. While that is a terrible thing, in so many ways, perhaps it will now be explained why the Biden family received 3.5 million dollars from the very wealthy former Mayor of Moscow’s wife. During out Presidential Debate, “moderator” Chris Wallace, then of Fox, would not let me ask that question. He said it was inappropriate. Perhaps that’s why Biden has been so “slow on the draw” with Russia. This is a really bad conflict of interest that will, perhaps now, be fully and finally revealed!

I don’t think I have to point out the monumental level of chutzpah in that statement coming from the man who had a Trump Tower Moscow in the works as he was running for president and spent his entire term running his business out of the oval office. When it comes to conflicts of interest, the Trump family wrote the book.

As for the ridiculous accusation, that comes from a sloppy partisan investigation conducted by Republican Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Chuck Grassley of Iowa which mistakenly identified Hunter Biden as a founder of a firm that was paid $3.5 million in 2014 by the wife of the late mayor of Moscow. But even that pathetic investigation didn’t produce any evidence that the payment to that firm was corrupt in any case. Bringing this up now is a classic, puerile Trumpian “I’m rubber, you’re glue, whatever you say bounce off me and sticks to you” taunt. That he deployed this petty, smear job in the context of the bloody carnage in Ukraine is just one more example of Trump’s unfitness for high office.

What is more interesting than that comment, to my mind, is Trump’s swipe at Joe Biden for being “slow on the draw” with Russia.

Let us not forget, after all, that Trump’s first public comments were abhorrent compliments to Putin for his very “savvy” “genius” in invading Ukraine and taking all that valuable land for his own. And he’s been all over the place since then. On Tuesday, he gave an interview to the Washington Examiner in which he revealed that he’s as clueless as ever, telling them:

“I’m surprised — I’m surprised. I thought he was negotiating when he sent his troops to the border. I thought he was negotiating. I thought it was a tough way to negotiate but a smart way to negotiate. I figured he was going to make a good deal like everybody else does with the United States and the other people they tend to deal with — you know, like every trade deal. We’ve never made a good trade deal until I came along. And then he went in — and I think he’s changed. I think he’s changed. It’s a very sad thing for the world. He’s very much changed.”

Right. He’s changed. Or maybe he played Trump for a fool when he was in office, as any sentient being could see?

Trump went on to tell the Examiner what he’s been saying to anyone who’ll listen ever since he realized that he’d made a very big mistake. He said he was actually tough on Putin by getting NATO to “pay their dues,” sanctioning Russia and “stopping” the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, between Germany and Russia, all of which is untrue.

NATO countries don’t pay dues they agree to pay a certain percentage of their GNP toward their own national defense. Some did raise their defense spending during Trump’s term but at least some of their rationale was based upon Trump’s bizarre affinity for Putin and his constant threats to withdraw from NATO. Trump did continue some sanctions against Russia that had been put in place under the previous administrations and added a few more. But he never mentions that it was Congress that passed the major sanctions bill targeting Russia’s energy and defense sectors on a bipartisan basis because they, too, were concerned about Trump’s coziness with Putin. He signed the sanctions bill reluctantly, calling it “seriously flawed.” As for the pipeline, his “stopping” it is wildly overstated. The U.S. and others were concerned about that pipeline long before Trump had ever heard of it. Trump did issue sanctions against the builders of the pipeline toward the end of his term, compelling one company to withdraw, but the job was finished by a Russian company. The vast majority of the pipeline was built during the Trump administration. When Biden came in they tried a different tack and waived some sanctions while adding on some others in the hopes of getting a diplomatic breakthrough with Germany on the issue. The invasion of Ukraine finally did the job and now the pipeline is kaput.

So, in other words, Trump is full of it as usual.

Still, he is in a bind on this issue. Regardless of his protestations to the contrary, everyone knows Trump is soft on Russia. As we look at the horrors on our TV screens and see the massive migration of millions of refugees, he is exposed. And his party is starting to notice.

Although he didn’t mention the Dear Leader by name, former vice president Mike Pence recently declared that there is no room for “Putin apologists” in the Republican Party at a big meeting of GOP donors, and then took a trip to the Polish-Ukraine border to look all tough and Commander-in-Chief-like. Trump appeared before those same donors and said “someone called me a Putin apologist,” confirming that he’s who Pence was talking about. He then declared that nobody has been tougher than he was before running through his greatest hits and blathering on about the 2020 election.

I don’t know if this war in Ukraine will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. That poor camel has been laden with so many straws since Trump came on the scene that you have to wonder if its back is made of steel. Admitting that he misread the situation and thought Putin was “negotiating” is one of the only times I’ve ever seen Trump admit that he was wrong and I’m not even sure he knows that’s what he did. Polling shows there is strong bipartisan support for Ukraine and a deep hostility toward Putin for what he’s done. Yet Trump just can’t seem to quit him. 

Salon

Who learned propaganda from whom?

Logo for Izvestia online — live TV channel.

The term “fog of unknowability” escaped me until Eric Boehlert mentioned it this morning. But while the term is unfamiliar, the tactic is not. Beohlert references a March 2017 essay at Vanity Fair that asks whether Donald Trump learned the tactic from the Russians:

Clint Watts, a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute who has studied Russian propaganda for years, sees major similarities between Putin’s and Trump’s approaches. “Create chaos in the system, such that you don’t know what is the truth or not the truth,” he says. The Kremlin does this by flooding television and digital media with biased coverage and wanton spin. The Trump administration has discovered something equally effective: lying to reporters and publicly attacking critics are like tossing grenades into the media eco-system. The press is constantly scrambling to respond to a never-ending river of slime, and the system is gradually overwhelmed.

Over time, this chaos creates what Pomerantsev describes as a “fog of unknowability.” Kellyanne Conway espouses “alternative facts” on NBC’s Meet the Press. President Trump continues to insist that millions voted illegally in the general election. The president’s relationships with government agencies like the C.I.A. are bitterly disputed. Objective reality splinters under the weight of falsehoods, conspiracies, and doubt, and the rules begin to change. “In that fog, norms and rational debate disappear, and all that matters is whoever’s faster, harder, more daring,” Pomerantsev says. “A different kind of calculus appears.”

As Boehlert notes, “the fog of unknowability” approach is “embraced by the Republican Party, Trump and Fox News.” The ability to define reality one way one day and another the next might have originated with the Ministry of Truth. By which Orwell alluded to Soviet control of information under Joseph Stalin. A Soviet joke well-known by the 1970s made fun of state-controlled newspapers Pravda (“truth”) and Izvestia (“news”): “There is no truth in Pravda and no news in Izvestia“.

Fox News is worse. When pressed, Fox may admit to being infotainment. Disinfotainment is more accurate.

Boehlert writes:

It’s a stunning collective that’s become more pronounced during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  The evidence of that alliance was on display when Kremlin forces teamed up with Fox News and GOP players to push the obvious distraction about Ukraine being the home of secret, U.S.-funded bioweapons that target certain ethnicities, thereby producing some sort of justification for Russia’s land war.

It’s shocking to watch an American media outlet such as Fox routinely suggest the U.S. provoked the Ukraine invasion, side with Russia over America, and smear Ukrainians as being unworthy of U.S. support. Still, the anti-democratic, authoritarian bonds are becoming tighter as the Trump movement now turns to the Kremlin for its messaging cues. The overlap is undeniable, and the implications are grave.

Look at how the Washington Post recently described Putin-era propaganda: “Russian disinformation often begins with a speck of fact, which is then twisted into a full-blown conspiracy theory. The technique makes it easier to spread and take root among the country’s supporters.” Sound familiar? They’re describing the foundation of Fox News’ daily programming.

For some reason though, the D.C. media which so easily identifies Russian propaganda, refuse to apply the same term when the GOP engages in the exact same behavior.

Note that the Post piece suggested Fox News’ Tucker Carlson had “fallen” for Russian disinformation about a bioweapons program in Ukraine. Trust me, nobody at Fox News, in the right-wing media, or inside the GOP has “fallen” for the bioweapons story — no one got duped. They have knowingly embraced the campaign of lies. That’s why state-run Russia TV is encouraged to air clips of Carlson. The two validate each other.

“The real opposition is the media,” Trump adviser Steve Bannon told author Michael Lewis. “And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with shit.” Author Jonathan Rauch said of Bannon’s approach, “This is not about persuasion: This is about disorientation.”

Which raises the question of why an “American” former president, his advisers, right-wing pundits, and his favorite media outlet have adopted tactics not just from Putin but formalized by Stalin.

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

For The Win, 4th Edition is ready for download. Request a copy of my free, countywide get-out-the-vote planning guide for county committees at ForTheWin.us. This is what winning looks like.

Zelensky: What allies give “for one week we use in 20 hours”

Residential buildings damaged by Russian shelling in Shevchenkivsky district of Kyiv. Photo: State Emergency Service of Ukraine in Kyiv via The Guardian.

“And now, democracies around the world are lucky to have you as our champion,” said Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Tuesday when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed Canada’s parliament via video link. Zelensky received a 3-minute standing ovation.

Today Zelensky will address the U.S. Congress to advocate for substantially more military aid for fighting off the Russian invasion, including air defense equipment and especially aircraft. Zelenky is making a virtual tour of Western capitols seeking more military aid.

Defenders’ endurance against overwhelming odds “would have been difficult without your efforts,” Zelenskiy said in addressing leaders of the Joint Expeditionary Force* nations Tuesday, but “we need more.”

How much more? Zelensky was blunt (Interfax-Ukraine, emphasis mine):

“Our people take trophies, we capture Russian equipment day and night. We take everything on the battlefield and send it back into battle. They even made the old Soviet equipment combat-ready, which did not work for us, and everything that we receive from you. But the volume that you give… for one week we use in 20 hours. We have so many occupiers, our military calls them locusts. For each person – 20-30 of their people, for one of our tanks – 100 of them,” he said.

U.S. President Joe Biden, presumably speaking for NATO, has repeatedly rejected imposing a no-fly zone over Ukraine as provocative and escalatory. The U.S. has also opposed providing Polish MiG fighters to Ukraine via a U.S. air base in Europe. That will not keep Zelensky from making his pitch again directly to Congress today at 9 a.m. Eastern (Washington Post):

Zelenky has proved to be a capable and inspiring leader, with an ability to prompt outpourings of global support. And he has shown himself willing to simultaneously rally and shame world leaders who he believes are not offering sufficient support in Ukraine’s war with Russia.

“Can you blame him for that?” said Igor Novikov, a former Zelensky adviser. “He’s a collective portrait of the Ukrainian people, and the Ukrainian people are suffering greatly at the moment. And a lot of the horrific damage to our country and to the lives of our people could have been prevented — and can still be prevented — by closing down our airspace, by providing us with proper antiaircraft systems and by providing us with the necessary support.”

[…]

Addressing European leaders at the beginning of the month, Zelensky’s appeal was so emotional that his English-language interpreter briefly choked up. A week later, when he addressed the British Parliament, Zelensky made a similarly moving pitch, echoing a refrain from an oration that British Prime Minister Winston Churchill delivered during World War II.

Even as he tries to hold off Russian assaults, Zelensky sees more room for compromise in recent Russian statements (The Guardian):

“The meetings continue, and, I am informed, the positions during the negotiations already sound more realistic. But time is still needed for the decisions to be in the interests of Ukraine,” Zelenskiy said in a video address early on Wednesday.

“Efforts are still needed, patience is needed,” he said. “Any war ends with an agreement.”

The leading Ukrainian negotiator, presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak, said there were “fundamental contradictions” between the two sides but added that “there is certainly room for compromise.”

Ukraine’s fierce determination and endurance against the Russian assault has defied expectations as much as Putin’s military has disappointed him. There seem to be few avenues for Putin to withdraw without being weakened himself short of crushing Ukraine and toppling Zelensky, but time may be against him, says one Western expert (Sky News):

The next 10 days will decide the war in Ukraine, according to a highly respected retired US general.

Writing for the Centre for European Policy Analysis, Lt Gen Ben Hodges has concluded that “the Russians are in trouble, and they know it”, writes our correspondent Alistair Bunkall.

“Russian generals are running out of time, ammunition, and manpower,” he assessed. 

“The Russians are experiencing ammunition shortages. Their transition to attrition warfare is driving up consumption rates beyond what they had planned and what they can sustain.”

While a majority of Russians may believe the government’s narrative about Nazis running Ukraine, a high-visibility protest this week suggests opposition inside Russia is building despite Putin’s efforts to control information there. Thousands of Russians who fear martial law and an economic disaster are traveling to Uzbekistan to evade conscription, Al Jazeera reports. “About 25,000 moved to Georgia, while others fled to Armenia, Turkey or Nordic states such as Finland.”

How much additional pressure Zelensky can apply via U.S. aid we may know in minutes.

It’s 9 a.m. ET and show time.

* The Joint Expeditionary Force includes the U.K, Denmark, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Holland, Sweden and Norway.

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

For The Win, 4th Edition is ready for download. Request a copy of my free, countywide get-out-the-vote planning guide for county committees at ForTheWin.us. This is what winning looks like.

Chernobyl Hostage Crisis

It was 10 a.m., 16 days into Russia’s war on Ukraine, and a land-line phone rang inside the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The site of the world’s worst nuclear-power disaster had become an impromptu prison, and an increasingly dangerous one.

The signalman on duty lifted the receiver and passed the call to shift supervisor Valentin Heiko, a veteran of the defunct facility. Mr. Heiko told managers on the other end of the line that the 210 technicians and support staff were in a desperate situation, held hostage while keeping watch over thousands of spent fuel rods.

The night before had brought another standoff between the exhausted technicians responsible for safeguarding the nuclear waste and the Russian soldiers who have been holding them on the job at gunpoint since the first hours of the war.

“The psychological situation is deteriorating,” Mr. Heiko said, updating managers in an office 30 miles away, two people on that call recalled. Some technicians, demanding to go home, were threatening to walk out, past the Russian tanks parked outside.

The supervisor, who celebrated his 60th birthday in captivity last week, said it was his duty to toil on as long as required. “Everyone wants to go home, but we know we need to stay.”

Since Feb. 23, Chernobyl’s technicians and support staff have been working nonstop. After arriving at 9 p.m. for a single night shift to monitor electrical transmission levels and the temperature inside the plant’s gigantic sarcophagus housing radioactive waste, they are approaching 500 hours on the job—snatching sleep on chairs in front of beeping machinery and on piles of clothes next to workstations.

Their diet has dwindled to porridge and canned food, prepared by a 70-year-old cook who at one point collapsed from exhaustion. Their phones have been confiscated and they are trailed by Russian soldiers through the nuclear plant’s labyrinth of reinforced-concrete corridors.

For weeks, the world’s nuclear energy regulators have been trying to understand what is happening inside the Chernobyl complex, where the condition of the facility and its crew has been shrouded by competing Ukrainian and Russian narratives.

The Wall Street Journal heard from workers trapped inside, reviewed videos and texts they sent to family members and spoke to more than a dozen relatives, friends, plant managers and local officials. The Journal was also able to access recordings of a daily 10 a.m. phone call, which connects the plant to an office in the town of Slavutych, built by the Soviet Union to house Chernobyl workers after the disastrous explosion of Reactor No. 4 in 1986.

The picture that emerges is of a skeleton crew of nuclear technicians that has been working under duress for nearly three weeks. One has a thyroid problem and needs medicine, as do several with high blood pressure. In the one-minute calls Russian soldiers allow workers to place to family members, they have told of extreme fatigue, dizziness, nausea and terrible headaches.

That exhaustion is mutating into rebellion, with staff members arguing with their captors over the nature of Russia’s war and staging acts of defiance. Every morning at 9, the national anthem, ‘Ukraine Has Not Yet Perished,’ blares through the loudspeaker. The Ukrainian workers stand, palms pressed to chests, then return to work.

Their families, meanwhile, are running low on heat and power, trapped by a Russian military encirclement around the Atomic City, as Slavutych is known, where locals clang church bells or honk car horns to sound the alarm whenever warplanes approach. Their calls for a safe corridor to evacuate the exhausted Chernobyl workers and replace them with other staff are backed by Ukraine’s government but rejected by Russia.

“I didn’t recognize his voice,” said the wife of a plant worker who spoke to her husband on Friday. “I could tell someone was standing behind him. Very short phrases.”

What is the point of this except to create nervousness in the rest of the world that this thing could go sideways in the worst possible way.

The Ukrainians say Russia may be planning a false flag blaming them for a nuclear accident. Russia says that Ukraine is building a dirty bomb. But really the true threat is an accident.

Chernobyl stopped producing electricity around 2000, yet it still needs staff to keep cool water circulating over thousands of spent fuel rods kept in four-story-deep basins lined with steel and reinforced concrete.

The pumps pushing new water over the spent nuclear fuel now rely on diesel generators. High-voltage power lines connecting the plant’s cooling system to the electricity grid were cut during fighting.

“If the pumps do not work,” a memo by a Ukrainian nuclear association official reads, “the water in the pool may boil, which will lead to the formation of radioactive steam, followed by the melting of the fuel assemblies, which will lead to a severe accident.”

On Wednesday, Ukrainian officials said that could happen in as little as seven days.

Western nuclear experts say this is unlikely because the spent fuel has been cooling for a long time so there won’t be a melt down. They believe the real risk is that a power outage will compromise ventilation and expose this staff and soldiers to high levels of radiation. And they are much more worried about the risk of accident at the still-active six-reactor Zaporizhzhia plan, the largest in Europe.

But these worker/hostages are in serious danger with no breaks, little food and isolation. Again, what is Putin playing at with this stuff?

Dispatch from crazytown

The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel reports from Wisconsin where the wingnuts have completely lost their minds:

When Wisconsin State Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) arrived at Saturday’s Republican caucus, he drove past a half-dozen protesters with “Toss Vos” signs, playing Buffalo Springfield’s “For What It’s Worth” on a karaoke speaker. When he walked inside, a four-page resolution condemning him was being passed around the room. And when he stood up to address fellow Republicans, Vos was standing a few feet away from his primary challenger.

“Within one month of a Republican governor being sworn into office in January of 2023, we are going to have election integrity, where we don’t have unsecured drop boxes at all in the state of Wisconsin,” Vos promised. “We need to make sure that our candidates running in 2022 focus on who our real adversaries are. And that’s not us. It’s the other guys!”

After that, the anti-Vos resolution was crushed — but it wasn’t the first, and it didn’t end the primary challenge. Fifteen months after the 2020 election, conservative anger at Donald Trump’s loss, and the idea Republicans could still wipe it off the books, has dominated local GOP politics. It’s not enough to question whether the election was fair, or whether Biden should be in the White House. 

“I would like for the Wisconsin Legislature to take a roll-call vote and determine whether the assemblymen and women stand with the people,” said Adam Steen, a conservative challenger to Vos. “The decertification is not to pull back the presidency. It’s almost a litmus test.”

In just the last four weeks, a state legislator who believes the election can be decertified has jumped into the race for governor; former lieutenant governor Rebecca Kleefisch (R), who has led in polls of that primary, would not say if she would have certified the 2020 election; and a Vos-appointed special counsel told the legislature that it “ought to take a very hard look” at decertifying President Biden’s 10 electoral votes in the state.

“Theyare leapfrogging over each other to get the far, far right,” Wisconsin’s Gov. Tony Evers (D) said in an interview. “They may want to forget about that, when whoever wins the primary runs against me. But we won’t let them forget about that.”

In other states, especially after the filibuster-assisted death of federal voting rights legislation, Democrats have been wary about focusing on election issues at the expense of inflation, gas prices or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. 

But in the states where the presidential election was closest, where the Trump campaign and conservative groups went to court to stop Biden’s victory, the topic is inescapable. Evers has made “democracy” one of the pillars of his reelection campaign, running as a bulwark against Republican election reform plans that would ban drop boxes, restrict absentee voting and abolish the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission — created by Republicans seven years ago.

The demands have grown louder and more numerous since last June, when Vos appeared at the state GOP’s convention and announced that he would answer concerns about the election by appointing Michael J. Gableman, a former state Supreme Court justice, as a special counsel with the power to investigate it.

“This is not a partisan effort,” Gableman told the Republican audience. Nine months later, Gableman is still investigating the election, on a contract that was just extended through the end of April. His report on the election, issued last month and presented to legislators at a March 1 hearing, suggested that the election had been compromised, by everything from the election commission lifting a rule that required monitors to witness votes cast by nursing home residents, to election management grants from the Center for Tech and Civic Life. 

The Gableman investigation, demanded by conservative activists, had kept pressure on election officials and generated explosive headlines — and were interpreted, in some conservative media, as breakthroughs on the way to a full-scale election audit leading to decertification. That, say Democrats, has made it easier for them to motivate their base and open donor wallets, in a midterm cycle when that’s traditionally hard to pull off. In 2021, said Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler, the state party raised more than $10 million, obliterating the fundraising record in an off-year.Advertisement

“The Republican strategy of having highly public fights about the most extreme ideas that would be the most dangerous to democracy has been a menace to Constitution, but a gift to the Democratic Party,” Wikler said in an interview. “The really dangerous foes are the ones who keep their plans secret until they execute them. But the GOP is publicly debating whether they have the legal authority to decertify the 2020 election. Every time they come up with a plan to jail mayors or dismantle the elections commission, it says this is a five-alarm fire.”

At Republican events this week, there was brimming enthusiasm for wins in 2022, and plenty of discussion about 2020. In Racine, before Vos spoke, state Sen. Van H. Wanggaard (R) told the audience that “my personal feeling is that our previous president should have won the election,” though he didn’t “believe that there was widespread fraud that occurred” in Wisconsin.

“They didn’t bring in buckets full of ballots and shove them through in the middle of the night,” said Wanggaard, pointing to a debunked story from Georgia — that a box of ballots in one counting room was actually a suitcase of fraudulent ballots added to the count. “They may have done other things, I believe, that caused the Democrats — who have been sitting there for the last decade looking at what areas of our election law can they exploit — to take advantage.”Advertisement

On Friday, at a meeting of the conservative Rock River Patriots in Fort Atkinson, activists and candidates, including Steen, asked why their leaders in Madison had not acted in 2020 to prevent the election changes that Gableman was now calling illegal. Their special guest, rallying after losing his voice, was state Rep. Timothy S. Ramthun (R), who had entered the race for governor after Vos had undermined his report — which preceded Gableman’s — urging for the election to be decertified.

“The actions legislators are taking right now are Band-Aid approaches at best. It’s layering bureaucracy on top of existing bureaucracy,” said Ramthun. The audience of more than a hundred activists, meeting at a church, booed at mentions of the Republican “establishment,” and cheered when Ramthun said that he’d raised the $100,000 necessary to compete for the party’s endorsement at this summer’s convention.

“As a nation, we have to stop saying it’s unconstitutional to reclaim the electors, because constitutional experts are saying it is,” Ramthun, 65, said in an interview. “I think that the excuse makers are running out of excuses.”

Ramthun’s decision to run for governor, which he announced at a rally with MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, didn’t dramatically alter the GOP’s view of that race. Kleefisch — who won two statewide races as the running mate of former governor Scott Walker (R) — was by far the best-known GOP gubernatorial candidate in this month’s Marquette Law poll of the race. Just 15 percent of Republican voters could identify Ramthun, and just 5 percent started out with a favorable view of the two-term legislator. And while Trump had praised the Gableman report, his statements urging Republicans to decertify the election didn’t mention Ramthun.

“I feel confident that Robin will exercise his moral duty to follow up on Justice Gableman’s findings,” Trump said in a statement last week. “I would imagine that there can only be a Decertification of Electors.” Other Republicans would not go as far as that. But Ramthun had, and spoke plainly about how voting to pull back Biden’s electors, even if it did not restore the presidency to Trump, would put Wisconsin on record that the president did not win the state.

“He goes from 306 electors to 296, right?” Ramthun said in an interview, shortly before Gableman issued the report. “If it becomes a constitutional crisis, that’s what they deserve. They’re the ones who cheated, not me.”Advertisement

After the report came out, Ramthun said that he had been vindicated. It had been impossible to imagine a special counsel being appointed to study the election, until conservatives pushed Vos to do it. It seemed unthinkable that mayors who presided over high turnout that Republicans called suspicious would be held accountable, until Gableman threatened them with jail time. The people who considered decertification to be impossible now had to confront a special investigator, whose term had just been extended, telling them that it wasn’t.

“I’m not the only one getting the scrutiny and criticism anymore,” said Ramthun, who was greeted with news stories calling him a “conspiracy theorist” when he launched the campaign. “Now there’s two ‘conspiracy theorists’ in the same foxhole. It’s nice to not be alone.” 

I have been wondering what in the world Trump is thinking with his daily email updates of 2020 election “fraud” allegedly being found in the swing states. Apparently, it’s feeding the cult what they want to hear.

You know it’s going to result in chaos in November. That, of course, is the plan.

Lara Logan smears Zelensky as a leather pants-wearing, Nazi, satanist

According to Lara Logan, President Zelensky is a puppet who has been linked to a satanic musical group and can be seen wearing leather pants and going shirtless on the internet.

If you don’t have time to watch the whole thing, here’s a taste:

What Russia has done from the very beginning has been very strategic. They didn’t go straight to Kyiv. They went to all those bioweapons laboratories that are scattered all over the country. Some of them they built. So they know where they are. They’ve known where they are since the Soviet Union, because under the defense threat reduction program, we went in after the fall of the Soviet Union, and supposedly they turned those facilities from bioweapons labs into public health labs. Although, you know, these days, it’s hard to believe anything that our leaders tell us because they’ve lied about COVID. They lied about Russia collusion. They lied about the Ukraine impeachment trial.

And there’s so much more going on in Ukraine that nobody is talking about. You see such dishonesty when it comes to the history of Ukraine. You see dishonesty when it comes to the Azov Battalion, which is funded by the U.S. and NATO. I mean, you can find pictures of them online holding up the NATO flag and the swastika. And at the same time, their own emblem contains the black sun of the occult, which was a Nazi SS emblem. And it also contains the sideways, you know, lightning insignia of the SS. I mean, this is on throughout the Ukrainian military you can see that black sun of the occult on their body armor, even on the female soldiers who are paraded in front of the world as being, you know, such an example of Ukraine’s independence and spirit and nobility. Even they are wearing the black sun of the occult. And, you know, we want — the White House wants you to believe, well, this doesn’t matter; it’s just a small number of troops. It’s not true. The Azov Battalion has been murdering its way through eastern Ukraine.

HENRY: Yeah.

LOGAN: We don’t want to admit this. This was why Crimea voted for independence. This is why Crimea wanted to be with Russia.

HENRY: Sure.

LOGAN: Because we in the media, in the western media and in the west, won’t acknowledge the reality of what’s gone on: Western Ukraine backed the Nazis. It was a headquarters for the Nazis SS. The CIA under Allen Dulles actually gave immunity from prosecution to the Nazis of Ukraine from the Nuremberg trials. So there’s a long history of the United States and our intelligence agencies funding and arming Nazis in Ukraine. These are not, like, new neo-Nazi groups that sprung up. These are the actual Nazis. From the second World War who, if you go back to the Nuremberg trials, said that they were planning for a thousand-year reich. And so you have to really wonder as you look at this, when you know that the CIA sponsored the color revolution in Ukraine in 2013 and ’14, that they selected Ukraine’s leaders; go to Victoria Nuland’s leaked phone conversation where she and the U.S. ambassador are deciding who can lead Ukraine.

HENRY: Right.

LOGAN: I mean, there’s as much interference here as you could possibly imagine, before we even get to Hunter Biden, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, and Mitt Romney and all of their children who are employed — who earn millions — from Ukrainian gas companies.

Note disgraced former CNN and Fox News anchor Ed Henry, saying “yeah, sure, right” through that whole demented diatribe.

By the way, if you haven’t heard of this “network” Real America’s Voices” here’s a story from the Washington Post from a while back:

Two years after being cast out of the White House, Stephen K. Bannon spoke from a steep, dusty hill outside El Paso, asking for donations. The former investment banker and Hollywood producer wanted cash in 2019 for his latest quest, to privately build President Donald Trump’s stalled border wall.

Not many news outlets were paying attention — except for one focusing on his every word.

It wasn’t Fox News or Newsmax. It wasn’t even Breitbart News, the far-right website Bannon once led, using it to help remake the GOP and elect Trump.

The coverage came from an upstart network run by a little-known media mogul in Colorado, a felon with a record of unpaid taxes and a family history marked by tragedy and violence. The mogul, Robert J. Sigg, found news value in Bannon’s mission to the desert, which ultimately resulted in fraud charges.

When Bannon launched his own talk show in the fall of 2019, calling it “War Room,” he quickly handed over its distribution to Sigg.

More than two years later, the arrangement has paid off for both men. Sigg used “War Room” as a springboard for an expanded network of conservative hosts — bringing him the commercial opportunity he sought.

The network, Real America’s Voice, helped sustain Bannon despite his removal from YouTube, Spotify and other mainstream platforms. It brings his show into as many as 8 million homes hooked up to Dish satellite television, many in rural, conservative areas without reliable cable coverage.

The rise of Real America’s Voice, built around Bannon and distant from the traditional power structures of cable television and talk radio, reveals how the country’s fractured media landscape has empowered unconventional actors following market incentives toward more and more extreme content.Advertisement

“We were told fairly regularly we were Trump propaganda,” said a former Real America’s Voice producer, who, like about a dozen other current and former employees of Sigg’s business, spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid professional reprisal. “That is what our role was. That was the message from the top: ‘We’re a Trump propaganda network.’ That’s where the money was.”

Here’s a little bit more on Robert Sigg’s sordid past:

48-year-old Robert Sigg, has a long criminal history dating back decades.

He now lives in a sprawling Parker mansion on a hilltop overlooking the city.

We have learned he is in Mexico on business. He is the owner of Performance One, a  media company in Centennial.

Robert Sigg’s trouble with the law includes a federal conviction for bank fraud in 2004.

He was also arrested for first degree burglary and assault in Jefferson County.

The rap sheet goes on: Driving under the influence in Evans, selling and distributing dangerous drugs in Weld county, as well as assault and battery in Aurora.

Denver police arrested him for obstructing, and resisting arrest and disturbing the peace.

Robert Sigg was charged as an habitual traffic offender in Thornton.

Parker police arrested him for domestic violence and driving under the influence of drugs.

Cool, cool. Oh, and by the way, in 2012 his son Austin was convicted of murdering a 10 year old girl when he was 17. He’s currently serving a life sentence.

Very Fine People, all of them.

Putin’s petty sanctions

This is actually pathetic:

Russia has imposed sanctions against US President Joe Biden, his son, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, other US officials, and “individuals associated with them,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Tuesday.

“In response to a series of unprecedented sanctions prohibiting, among other things, entry into the United States for top officials of the Russian Federation, from March 15 of this year, the Russian ‘stop list’ includes on the basis of reciprocity President J. Biden, Secretary of State A. Blinken, Secretary of Defense L. Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff M. Milley, as well as a number of department heads and prominent US figures,” the statement read.

The statement went on to explain that this retaliation step was “an inevitable consequence of the extremely Russophobic course taken by the current US Administration, which, in a desperate attempt to maintain American hegemony, has relied, discarding all decency, on the frontal constricting of Russia.”

“At the same time, we do not refuse to maintain official relations if they meet our national interests, and, if necessary, we will solve problems arising from the status of persons who appear on the ‘black list’ in order to organize high-level contacts,” the statement continues.

Here is a list of people included in Russia’s “stop list”:

US President Joe Biden

Secretary of State Antony Blinken

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley

National security adviser Jacob Sullivan

CIA Director William Burns

White House press secretary Jen Psaki

Daleep Singh, Biden’s deputy national security adviser for international economics

United States Agency for International Development Administrator Samantha Power

President Biden’s son Hunter Biden

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo

Reta Jo Lewis, president and chairman of the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank

The statement announces more sanctions will follow to expand the list by including “top US officials, military officials, lawmakers, businessmen, experts, and media people who are Russophobic or contribute to inciting hatred towards Russia and the introduction of restrictive measures.”

What an interesting list.

And this is an interesting question:

Why would Russia announce sanctions against members of the Admin and people out of govt like Hillary Clinton and Hunter Biden, but nothing against Trump or any Republicans?

Hmm. That’s a real head scratcher. Could the inclusion of Hunter Biden on the list be a clue?

I think we can feel confident that Tucker Carlson won’t be on the list. Or Donald Trump.

Update: lol