Skip to content

Month: August 2022

Dark Brandon rises

This is starting to get fun

Here are some highlights of his rally last night. Dark Brandon is feeling his oats:

The message is freedom and democracy

Whoda thunkit?

Brian Beutler wrote another great article this week in his Big Tent newsletter about the Democratic strategy for winning in November. (You should subscribe, if you haven’t.) He discusses all the bellwether races that are showing Democrats are over-performing:

​But of all these bellwethers, the Democratic victory in the NY-19 special offers the most prescriptive power. It’s a bellwether not so much in the numerical shift from R to D, as in the character of its losing candidate, Marc Molinaro, and the conduct of its winning candidate, Pat Ryan. (Side note: too many politicians with the last name Ryan).

On the spectrum of candidates in off-cycle elections, Molinaro’s much more Glenn Youngkin than Larry Elder. He was as good a candidate as Republicans could have drawn, running a textbook GOP campaign in a favorable climate for Republicans (at least, until Dobbs). And he lost.

The guy who beat him superficially resembles the kind of candidates Democrats like to run in competitive districts. A veteran who emphasizes service, duty, honor—admirable traits selected to set swing voters at ease; code for: He’s not like those other WACKY libs. Unlike a lot of Democratic nominees in competitive districts, though, he has not tried to hide from fights that force voters to choose sides. He leaned heavily into his pro-choice bona fides, tied them directly to his larger political persona, and then draped it all around his opponent’s neck.

“Freedom includes a woman’s right to choose,” he asserted in his first ad. “How can we be a free country if the government tries to control women’s bodies? That’s not the country I fought to defend.”

In a post-election interview with Greg Sargent, Ryan seized the high grounds of freedom and patriotism generally, and wielded it against Republican politicians whose vision for America would leave citizens at the mercy of armed extremists and religious zealots, without fair recourse to the ballot box. He told MSNBC’s Alex Wagner, “We are not afraid to call out Donald Trump as someone who, I believe, is essentially traitorous,” reminding viewers, “I had a top-secret clearance. I was an Army officer. If I had done what he did, I would’ve been in jail, 100 percent. No questions asked.”  

Contrast to DCCC Chair Sean Patrick Maloney who would much rather see candidates and members like Ryan ignore Trump and talk about drug prices. Contrast to Conor Lamb, the last great hope of the House Democratic caucus, who won a special election in a Trumpy Pennsylvania district in 2018 and proceeded to attribute it to his special formula of ignoring the menace of the far right and talking about health care instead. There was a candidate who got washed ashore by a tidal wave of anti-Trump backlash and told the whole world he’d gone surfing. Much better to have candidates who recognize the larger forces carrying them along, and swim with the tide.

He’s right about this. Ryan deftly wove his bio as a veteran and a “fighter” into a message about fighting for freedom at home and I think it has more resonance in the face of the right wing led by Trump and DeSantis which is reaching into people’s private intimate lives in ways that just feels un American. (It actually is American — there have been factions doing this from the beginning — but when government bodies start literally reversing rights and censoring free speech it gets serious.)

I think Ryan was on to something. This is a race the GOP should have won in a red wave midterm year.

The Big Question

What was he doing with those documents?

It appears that some of the information they retrieved was extremely sensitive. He kept Human, Signals, and FISA intelligence in an unsecure location for over a year, some of it in a container at the bottom of his closet. WTF????

One of the latest excuses is that he was writing his “memoirs” or preparing for his presidential library. There is zero evidence that he is “writing” anything (he always employed a ghost writer anyway) and there are no plans for a presidential library. It seems obvious that he had some kind of ulterior motive and I’m no longer convinced that it had to do with him wanting to show off his presidential memorabilia to his sycophants. I think he either thought he could cover up his own deeds by taking the documents or that he was preparing to rain down vengeance on his enemies and reward his friends. That’s how he operates.

BTW: here’s his response:

A funny thing happened on the way to the drubbing

Democrats decided they’re mad as hell and they aren’t going to take it anymore

Acouple of months ago it was widely accepted conventional wisdom that the Democrats were toast in November. There was endless blather about historical precedent, presidential approval ratings, gas prices and backlash leading to a “Red Tsunami” that would bring the Republicans a huge new congressional majority. Everyone could just take the summer off and reconvene in the days before the election to witness the glorious GOP victory.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the drubbing.

Democratic voters were aroused from their torpor by various events that seem to have mobilized them in unexpected numbers. This analysis by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut in Salon points out that voters are concerned with a number of issues that were not thought to be on the ballot, particularly the assault on democracy they saw illustrated by the January 6th Committee hearings and the bold attacks on voting systems they are observing all over the country. This was not supposed to be a voting issue according to the jaded beltway CW, certainly not as long as people had pecuniary interests at stake. (The assumption is always that the American people care about nothing but their own pocketbooks.)

The mass shootings this summer have also had an effect. The country was particularly horrified by the elementary school shooting in Uvalde, Texas which killed 19 fourth graders and two teachers in their classrooms. That event even spurred Congress to enact a minor bipartisan federal gun law, the first in many years, showing that there may be cracks in the pro-gun proliferation movement at long last.

In fact, the substantial list of somewhat miraculous legislative achievements coming out of this very narrow congressional majority has given Democratic voters good reason to believe that maybe their chronically underwhelming party is actually capable of accomplishing something, The big Inflation Reduction Act came as a huge surprise after months of dizzying negotiations. It delivering such a surprisingly good climate change package was the icing on the cake. This week’s announcement on student loan forgiveness will likely make it even sweeter.

Nonetheless, the issues that are driving the turnout are mainly based upon concerns about the right’s dangerous unwillingness to confront the existential problems we face and its relentless quest to turn back progress and roll back fundamental rights. As analyst Ron Brownstein points out, the latest NBC poll shows that Democrats have a very different view of what matters in this election than Republicans.

And I haven’t yet mentioned the biggest issue that is stimulating Democrats to get out and vote: abortion. 

Salon’s Sophia Tesfaye wrote about the latest evidence of its salience citing the bellwether special election in New York’s 19th district this week in which Democrat Pat Ryan beat his Republican rival by putting abortion rights at the top of his agenda. In races around the country this summer, Democrats are outperforming expectations, and first-time women voters are registering in big numbers. Tesfaye notes:

In Michigan, a poll conducted this month discovered that abortion is now tied with inflation and rising prices as the most important issue to voters — and Democrat Gretchen Whitmer is leading in the gubernatorial race. Nationally, nearly two-thirds of Americans said the end of Roe represented a “major loss of rights” for women, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll conducted last month. A Pew poll released on Tuesday found that 56% of registered voters said the issue of abortion will be very important in their midterm vote, up from 43% in March. “Virtually all of the increase has come among Democrats,” Pew wrote

It turns out that Americans don’t like their rights being taken away from them. Go figure.

Republicans are scrambling to deal with this. Apparently, they believed they could just ride the red tsunami without having to lift a finger. Even aside from the terrible candidates they have put on offer, mostly thanks to Donald Trump, it appears they have dropped the ball in numerous other ways. Florida Senator Rick Scott is in hot water for floating on a mega-yacht in the Mediterranean while headlines blare about his poor management frittering away tens of millions of dollars as the chairman of the Republican Senate Campaign Committee. The Republican National Committee (RNC), meanwhile, is having to send out distress signals to their big donors because Donald Trump is hoarding all the small donor cash and the party is left desperate for funds.

Even more revealing is the fact that Republicans have belatedly discovered that their medieval approach to reproductive rights isn’t a big winner, even with many of their own voters. After years of portraying abortion as murder, pushing “fetal personhood” and lately deciding that it should be banned even in cases of rape, incest and the health of the mother, it turns out that these archaic ideas are the kiss of death in swing states.

Republicans allowed their fanatical anti-choice base to run wild for years under the assumption that they would never have to face voters with their outrageous claims because of Roe v. Wade.

For instance, Nevada’s Republican candidate for Senate, Adam Laxalt, previously supported a ban on abortion after 13 weeks and, as state attorney general, supported restricting access to birth control. Now he doesn’t want to talk about any of that saying that the right to abortion is “settled law” in Nevada. (Anyone who trusts those words coming out of the mouth of a self-described “pro-life” Republican after what the Supreme Court Justices just did is a fool.)

An even better example is Blake Masters, the GOP nominee for Senate in Arizona. On Thursday he scrubbed his campaign website of his far-right anti-abortion rhetoric, now claiming that he’s the “common sense” candidate who supports abortion up to 15 weeks. This is a man who endorsed every fanatical anti-abortion idea the right-wing came up with, including granting “personhood” to a fertilized egg and promoting the grotesque notion that abortion is genocide:

No amount of backtracking can erase that sentiment. Democrats should just run that ad as is.

The Republicans have a problem, a big one. They thought they had an easy win on their hands and they could get right to business impeaching Joe Biden and shutting down the government for shits and giggles but it appears they have a real race on their hands instead. But their problem is actually more serious than just this midterm election. The abortion issue is going to haunt them for the foreseeable future, over and over again as one state after another grapples with the mess they made for themselves. They allowed their fanatical anti-choice base to run wild for years under the assumption that they would never have to face voters with their outrageous claims because of Roe v. Wade. Now they do and it’s not going well for them. There’s a bigger lesson in that if they would care to learn it. 

Salon

Semi or pseudo?

Fascism by any other name

Image from FBI/DOJ affidavit.

A high school friend was raised a good Southern Baptist. “We couldn’t cuss in the house,” he said. “Except you could say ‘damn yankee,’ because that’s just what they were.”

President Joe Biden will likely get a lot of blowback for branding “MAGA Republicans” a “threat to our very democracy” and “semi-fascism.” But, you know….

“Also, what exactly is ‘semi-fascism’?” asks Shadi Hamid of Brookings. “It’s not even a thing.”

Well, it’s sort of a thing. An Idaho native, Dave Neiwert has followed American neo-nazis and alt-right militias for a long, long time. He flagged pre-Trumpism as pseudo-fascist nearly two decades ago:

Call it Pseudo Fascism. Or, if you like, Fascism Lite. Happy-Face Fascism. Postmodern Fascism. But there is little doubt anymore why the shape of the “conservative movement” in the 21st century is so familiar and disturbing: Its architecture, its entire structure, has morphed into a not-so-faint hologram of 20th-century fascism.

It is not genuine fascism, even though it bears many of the basic traits of that movement. 

Since 2004, those traits connecting militant conservatism to fascism have gelled.

Brownshirts in body armor

Neiwert writes at Daily Kos:

The arrests this week of five Florida militiamen who called themselves the “B Squad” for their violent actions on Jan. 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol serve as a helpful reminder that the Justice Department is still in the process of bringing the insurrectionists who attacked American democracy that day—now over 860 and counting—to justice.

The details of their case, moreover, are chilling reminders of just how close the nation came to catastrophe that day, saved largely by the valor of police officers who defended the Capitol—and the deep implications of these unfolding arrests for the Republican Party, after NBC News identified the ringleader of the B Squad as a recently defeated GOP legislative candidate, a man who has not yet been charged.

The affidavit filed by prosecutors features a number of screenshots from videos of the B Squad undertaking paramilitary exercises to prepare for Jan. 6, including several of the man it identifies only as “B Leader,” who is not among the five men arrested Wednesday. NBC News’ Ryan J. Reilly identified B Leader as Jeremy Liggett, who ran for Congress this year in Florida’s 7th Congressional District, but dropped out in March and did not qualify for the August GOP primary.

Liggett and his men arrived in Washington, D.C. ahead of Jan. 6 prepared for combat. The affidavit states that “B Leader”:

1. Advised that the video was for “all of you Patriots out there that are going to Washington, D.C., […] to support Trump, to have your voices heard” and that “we are going to have four more years of Trump, we all know that”;

2. Warned that “we all know in D.C., once the sun goes down, things get a little bit violent and the reason why things get a little bit violent is because you have socialist, leftist, Marxist, communist agitators like Black Lives Matter and Antifa […]”;

3. Described so-called “defensive tools” to take to Washington, D.C., including “the strongest pepper spray commercially available to use,” an ASP baton (i.e., an expandable metal baton), knives with blades that were 3 inches or less, a walking cane, and a taser, all items that B Leader incorrectly claimed were legal in Washington, D.C.; and

4. Said that he was “super excited about DC on the 6th of January,” and he advised “patriots [to] keep up the fight.”

Semi-fascism? The American right claims to value blunt talk. Until it’s directed at them.

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Request a copy of For The Win, 4th Edition, my free, countywide get-out-the-vote planning guide for county committees at ForTheWin.us.

Biden steps up his game

Signs of life: Democrats suddenly look feisty

The graphic above is over the top, of course. A House special election win on Tuesday and other indicators that 2022 will not be a Republican wave year does not a blue wave make.

Even so….

The Kansas landslide rejection of an abortion ban amendment, tightening national generic polls, a Florida poll showing Rep. Val Demings (D) edging Sen. Marco Rubio (R) in his reelection bid, polls in Ohio showing Democrat Rep. Tim Ryan ahead of GOP Senate candidate J.D. Vance, and weak GOP fundraising as Donald Trump siphons his party’s election fuel have lifted Democrats’ spirits.

As have Democrats’ legislative wins this summer, surging post-Dobbs voter registration by women, this week’s announcement of President Biden’s student debt forgiveness, and Biden’s approval numbers creeping up as gas prices creep down.

Not to mention ominious-looking legal threats to the former president.

The White House on Thursday issued an in-your-face Twitter rebuttal to Republican criticisms of student debt forgiveness. Damn, I don’t recall anything quite like it.

The White House brought receipts. Joe Biden did. What a concept.

Give that staffer a raise, someone replied in the comments. Others cited other Republican electeds who had PPP loans forgiven. It’s not that Democrats did not receive any during the pandemic. It’s that Democrats are not the ones going all “for me but not for thee” now about student loan forgiveness.

Capping it off, Biden went after Trump’s MAGA movement head-on Thursday:

“What we’re seeing now is either the beginning or the death knell of an extreme MAGA philosophy. It’s not just Trump, it’s the entire philosophy that underpins the — I’m going to say something, it’s like semi-fascism,” he said at a fundraising event hosted by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in Bethesda, Md.

It’s part of Biden’s midterm strategy, The Hill reported, “to paint Republicans as extreme.”

He won’t need two coats either.

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Request a copy of For The Win, 4th Edition, my free, countywide get-out-the-vote planning guide for county committees at ForTheWin.us.

You want an election enhancing money grab?

I’ll give you an election enhancing money grab

Trump rails against the student loan forgiveness plan:

“Joe Biden and the Radical Left Democrats have just orchestrated another election enhancing money grab, this time to the tune of $300,000,000,000 — and just like I predicted, it’s coming right out of the pocket of the working-class Americans who are struggling the most!” Trump said Thursday in a statement. 

Blah,blah, blah. The GOP is out there blathering about how the Democratic Party is the party of rich white people. Lol. His signature tax cuts didn’t exactly go to poor people of color. And it was worth trillions. (And Trump complaining about money grabs is something else.)

Remember this from 2020? Please….

Government payments to farmers have surged to historic levels under President Donald Trump as the Agriculture Department floods the industry with cash to stem the financial losses from Trump’s tariff fights and the coronavirus pandemic.

But as agriculture grows more reliant on unprecedented taxpayer support, farm policy experts and watchdog groups warn the subsidies are growing too big and too fast, with no strings attached and little oversight from Congress — and that Washington could have a difficult time shutting off the spigot.

Direct farm aid has climbed each year of Trump’s presidency, from $11.5 billion in 2017 to more than $32 billion this year — an all-time high, with potentially far more funding still to come in 2020, amounting to about two-thirds of the cost of the entire Department of Housing and Urban Development and more than the Agriculture Department’s $24 billion discretionary budget, according to a POLITICO analysis. But lawmakers have taken a largely hands-off approach, letting the department decide who gets the money and how much.

The massive payments have been a political boon to Trump in farm country — he tweeted in January that he hoped the money would be “the thing they will most remember” — but risk creating a culture of dependency, as farmers and ranchers work the bonus subsidies into their financial plans when making large, up-front investments in seed, feed and farm machinery.

“It’s a big problem for agriculture because it’s not sustainable,” said Anne Schechinger, senior economics analyst at the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit watchdog organization. “It’s really difficult once you’re giving farmers this much money to then take away those [payments].”

It’s a problem for taxpayers, too: The size, speed and lack of scrutiny of the payments should concern the public,says Neil Hamilton, emeritus professor and former director of Drake University’s Agricultural Law Center.

“It’s just, ‘Here’s your check.’ There’s an incredible amount of trust that [farmers] will use it wisely,” he said. “But at the end of the day, it’s your and my tax money. It’s not a crazy idea to ask what the public’s getting from this, or could the public expect more for it.”

The spending surge began in mid-2018 when USDA started writing checks to farmers and ranchers to pay for the damage from Trump’s trade war, which brought about higher tariffs that crushed agricultural exports and commodity prices. Farm sales to China plummeted from $19.5 billion in 2017 to just $9 billion the next year; as producers continued to hemorrhage profits in 2019, farm bankruptcies jumped nearly 20 percent last year.

The trade bailout has now spanned three years and surpassed $23 billion, even though it was never appropriated by Congress. Instead, the money was funneled through USDA’s Commodity Credit Corporation, a Depression-era agency that can borrow from the U.S. Treasury to stabilize the farm economy.

That bailout was entirely due to Trump’s fatuous “trade war” and he openly touted it as away to buy votes in rural America. Many of those “farmers” are very wealthy members of Big Ag.

By the way, apropos of nothing:

The U.S. Department of Education reports that roughly 2.4 million Americans ages 62 and older carry an average of $40,750 in college debt.

I would guess most of them are people who went back to school later in life and took jobs in public service for job security and benefits. They are also drowning in debt.

What will happen if they win the House?

Ugh… it’s just awful. But if Dems can keep the Senate there is an upside

This is a good analysis by Kate Riga at Talking Points Memo of what’s to come if the Republicans win the House and the Democrats hold the Senate, which, as of today, seems the likelier outcome in November:

In recent months, due to some combination of unexpected Democratic legislative success, a somewhat rosier economic outlook, abominable Republican candidate recruitment and fallout from the Supreme Court’s overturning of abortion rights, Democrats’ congressional prospects have brightened. 

Many prognosticators are no longer projecting full-scale congressional demolition for the party. Some, like FiveThirtyEight and Decision Desk HQ, now predict that Democrats will hold the Senate. Most still give Republicans the edge in flipping the House. 

Political trifectas are historically short-lived, and the Democrats’ may well be coming to an end. As exasperating as the past two years have been for Democrats forced to legislate by the whims of Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), that early term productivity will stand unmatched by a split-Congress reality.

Republicans are already champing at the bit to punish President Joe Biden with their newfound investigatory powers, should they retake the House. The push to do so will only grow, as new maps consisting of exceptionally noncompetitive districts let more extreme candidates dominate GOP primaries and flood into Congress. Party kingmaker former President Donald Trump, too, tends to select endorsees and boost candidates who prioritize loyalty to him and his lie that Biden is an illegitimate president over anyone interested in bipartisan collaboration. 

All of that could add up to a legislature fixated on manufacturing scandal about everything from Hunter Biden’s laptop to the administration’s student loan plans, culminating in flailing stabs at impeachment.

Given that, what can we expect a split Congress to actually do?

“Can we expect Biden for example, with Republicans controlling the House, to pull something off like he did last month? The answer is absolutely not,” Jeff Peake, political science professor at Clemson University, told TPM, referencing the miraculous resuscitation of the Inflation Reduction Act. “Things will come to a screeching halt in Washington.” 

Republican House 

Mitch McConnell famously opined after the 2010 midterms that, for his party, “the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

The would-be Republican House majority has already telegraphed plans to take that approach to the extreme, with an added sprinkle of MAGA on top. 

The only legislation we might see Republicans working with Democrats on, political scholars theorized, are must-pass items like annual spending bills — and even those could come down to a game of shutdown chicken. 

In that way, too, it could have echoes of the Obama years, when the Republican House forced repeated government shutdowns, including when Democrats wouldn’t agree to weaken or defund the Affordable Care Act in exchange for GOP support for the appropriations continuing resolution.

Maybe something on the level of the COVID-19 pandemic would prompt them to cooperate, Eric Schickler, political science professor at the University of California, Berkeley, mused: After all, in 2020, under Trump, the Democratic-controlled House and Republican-controlled Senate acted in unison to pass relief legislation.

“But even in a crisis, it’s less clear that this Republican majority would act,” he said. “It would depend on it being electorally really bad for them not to come to the table.”

A Republican House may be even more unwilling than usual to work with Democrats on the eve of a presidential election year. 

“I don’t see either party getting any parts of their agenda through — maybe only something they agree on, like China is bad or Russia is bad,” Peake said. 

[…]

Big Republican Plans

Instead, House Republicans would likely spend their time on what they’ve already promised to do: a whole constellation of investigations into everything from the Afghanistan pullout to the Mar-a-Lago raid. 

Many are already promising to impeach Biden, though they tend to be flexible on the rationale. 

With a base in Trump’s thrall and increasingly radical candidates winning seats, GOP calls for vengeance on a President they don’t like (and who many wrongly believe lost in 2020) will be loud and unrelenting. 

While that posture would grind congressional productivity to a standstill, it could hold a silver lining for Democrats heading into 2024. 

“Biden would be able to paint Republicans as going after him for revenge, and that could be helpful for Democrats in the next election,” Peake said. “They’d be a foil.” 

“I have a hunch that if it’s a slim Republican majority, it’ll be a hard couple years for McCarthy,” Schickler added. “Republican majority leaders in recent years have had an almost impossible job: the base wants them to do one thing, but some of what they want is not really gonna play well in swing districts.”  

Such overreach has cost a party before; Republicans going overboard in their desire to punish former President Bill Clinton during his impeachment made 1998 one of the very rare years that the incumbent President’s party picked up House seats in the midterms. 

Democratic Senate 

While Democrats would certainly prefer to hold both chambers, keeping the upper one comes with special perks. 

Even with a hostile Republican House, Democrats could confirm judicial and executive branch appointments apace. Should any Supreme Court vacancies arise, Democrats would be able to fill them unilaterally. 

A Democratic Senate would also afford Biden some protection. 

“Republicans won’t be able to set up veto showdowns with Biden,” Schickler said. “If they had both chambers, it’s possible you pass a bill to fund the government with tough conditions that Biden has to veto, and maybe he gets blamed.” 

“Holding the Senate also means agenda control,” Lee added. That applies to what comes to the floor for a vote, as well as what Senate committees would focus on in their hearings. 

As of recent history, split Congresses have been unproductive Congresses. If Republicans take even just the House, the Biden legislative agenda will be paltry. The next two years would be replete with executive action and frivolous House investigations — but also significant work in reshaping the federal judiciary. If Democrats can only hold one chamber, the Senate is the more important one to keep.

I agree with that. If nothing else the Senate confirms judges and that is super important right now.

However, it’s really depressing to think of the House investigations and probable impeachment of Jose Biden. Watching them persecute Dr. Fauci is going to make me dive heavily into the tequila. They are going to go even more batshit crazy than they were in the past. It’s going to be a circus.

Right now I’m smoking the Hopium whishing the House Democrats can somehow hang on. Two years of Marge Green and Lauren Boebert grilling Democrats … oy.

From the “No good deed ….” files

The man who gave Trump his legacy gets kicked to the curb

Poor Mitch, after all he did for Trump …

Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday slammed Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell as “a pawn for the Democrats” and said he should “immediately” be replaced.

Trump, who soured on McConnell after the Senate leader condemned Trump for the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection and acknowledged President Joe Biden’s election victory, has renewed his attacks since last week, when McConnell gave a downbeat assessment of his party’s prospects of winning Senate control in the November election. Without naming anyone, McConnell cited “candidate quality” as a factor — an apparent swipe at struggling Trump-endorsed candidates like Dr. Mehmet Oz in Pennsylvania, Herschel Walker in Georgia, and J.D. Vance in Ohio.

“Mitch McConnell is not an Opposition Leader, he is a pawn for the Democrats to get whatever they want,” Trump said in a statement on his Truth Social platform. “He is afraid of them, and will not do what has to be done. A new Republican Leader in the Senate should be picked immediately!”

Trump also tore into McConnell’s wife Elaine Chao, who resigned as Trump’s transportation secretary days after the Capitol riot. Trump cited an article in the conservative outlet The Federalist reporting the couple have been using their positions to make money in China.

Over the weekend, Trump bashed McConnell as a “broken down hack” and said he should spend more time and money helping GOP candidates than “helping his crazy wife and family get rich on China!”

Trump allies. including Fox News personality Sean Hannity, also took swipes at McConnell, accusing him of abandoning his own party’s candidates.

A cash-rich Super PAC linked to McConnell will spend $156 million after Labor day across eight states to boost candidates.

Despite the nastiness, McConnell appeared reluctant to criticize Trump, declining to talk about the former president’s attacks on his wife.

This is not the first time Trump has called for new GOP Senate leadership. Last year, he told Fox Business that McConnell had “not done a great job” and should no longer be leading Republicans in the upper chamber, according to The Hill.

Trump also accused McConnell of being pushed around by Democrats, blaming him for not doing enough to stop the landmark Inflation Reduction Act, which he called “a waste of money.”

Democrats surprised McConnell by securing the support of Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) on the revised version of what had been called Build Back Better. McConnell had said the Senate wouldn’t pass a computer chip bill if Democrats pursued budget reconciliation to pass the Inflation Reduction Act. But Democrats passed both.

McConnell has said he would still back Trump in 2024 if he was the Republican nominee for president.

Yet another example of a reluctant bootlicker who licks those boots regardless, all in the name of retaining power. McConnell clearly hates Trump. There’s no doubt about it. It would have voted to impeach him if there had been the votes to do it in the 2nd impeachment, he’s admitted that.

He is 80 years old and already accomplished his greatest achievement: packing the Supreme Court with far-right judges. What more does he have to gain by taking this abuse from Donald Trump?

Oz goes full Trump

It appears he’s getting some advice from Mar-a-lago

Yuck. Via Daily Kos:

In Pennsylvania—well, somewhere nearby it, anyway—the Mehmet Oz campaign has been getting more and more exasperated with their Democratic rival. John Fetterman, battling Oz for one of the state’s Senate seats, has been capitalizing on Oz’s every gaffe, and while Oz’s campaign hasn’t yet sunk to the level of complete national embarrassment that Georgia Senate candidate Herschel Walker has managed, it has been getting real close.

You know, like releasing very, very odd campaign videos in which the candidate attempts to go shopping for the ingredients of “crudités,” only to get the name of the Pennsylvania grocery store chain completely wrong while sliding around the place like this “shopping” thing was an entirely new experience for him.

You can’t pin that one on John Fetterman, buddy. That one’s all you.

Fetterman has, however, been masterfully capitalizing on the inherent ridiculousness of Dr. Quack’s Campaign Adventures, and the Oz campaign has been losing their cool as the weeks go on. That led to a snipe from Oz’s senior communications adviser, Rachel Tripp, sniffing that if Fetterman “had ever eaten a vegetable in his life, then maybe he wouldn’t have had a major stroke.”

In general, that there is what is usually considered a gaffe. Attacking a candidate over a medical condition or disability is extremely not done, and it’s not because anyone involved in (Republican) politics still has a scrap of minor decency they’re clinging to, it’s because attacking your opponent for a medical condition immediately causes every other American voter with that same medical condition to bristle. The number of people who have either had strokes or are at risk of them is very, very large, and few of them are likely to take kindly to a sneering dig suggesting that maybe they deserve it.

You’d typically see the offending campaign distance itself from such a blunder, but no:

(Trump may live on Big Macs himself but he would have no problem advising Oz to attack Fetterman for his diet.In fact, it would give him a particular thrill to do it.)

I have to point out that that’s not a vegetable, but never mind that for now. We get it: Everybody send Mehmet Oz an apple and we’ll never have to hear from him again. Plus, it’ll keep him from having to go back to a grocery store.

Even as condemnations of the Oz campaign’s attacks began to roll in, the campaign defended their remarks with an equally sneering “we’re only trying to help” statement. A co-chair of the Oz campaign speculated to ABC News that “I think he’s just had it,” referring to Oz himself, and “he’s probably tired of hearing about veggies.”

Yes, it’s been a long campaign and you can’t expect the rich guy who took a field trip from his New Jersey mansion for this to not at some point snap about the treatment he’s been getting. First having to walk into a grocery store, then getting laughed at over it? That’s the origin story of a Batman villain. How could Oz not end up a twisted, broken husk of a man.

Anywho, the Oz campaign has clearly decided that not only won’t it be backing away from Tripp’s snipe, they’re going to embrace it. Asshole mode, engage:

There’s been no suggestion that Fetterman’s health is that fragile, of course, but both campaigns are probably rethinking their debate stances good and hard at this point. We may have started out the season with an assumption that television personality “Dr.” Oz would have the experience to not make a fool of himself during a televised debate, but that certainly ain’t true now. And the Fetterman camp’s wariness over giving a professional television grifter what he wants most in life, an audience, may ebb with the news that all Fetterman has to do is say crudités in a low voice to set Oz off.

Fetterman’s been treating the Oz camp’s tantrum here with a bit of mild disgust, but that’s about it. It’s also probably all it’s worth. “I could never imagine ridiculing someone for their health challenges,” he tweeted, before immediately moving on to more important things:

Huh, a Hollywood Spider Crab? It’s a voracious bottom-feeder found mostly in California, but can migrate to Florida, New York, or even New Jersey when conditions are right. Didn’t know those things were still around.

Don’t blame Oz on California. He’s not one of ours. (We have had our share, including Nixon and Reagan…)

Seriously, Oz’s attack on Fetterman for his eating habits is a big mistake. I really doubt that any Pennsylvanian who isn’t totally devoted to the Trump cult thinks that’s funny. Making fun of his stroke os suggesting that he’s too disabled to run certainly doesn’t play well with those suburban moms he’s supposed to be attracting, especially since he’s a doctor. The whole thing is gross. He’s gross.