Skip to content

Month: October 2022

Dangerous, dehumanizing lies

Living through mass insanity

Leah Millis/Reuters

The late Molly Ivins once wrote how in the Texas state legislature it was not uncommon to have legislators at odds with one another to go to “fist city.” How long today before they go to guns?

In researching his new book, “Weapons of Mass Delusion: When the Republican Party Lost Its Mind,” Robert Draper had first to get past the obstacle that conservatives he hoped to interview saw him as an implacable enemy. He routinely encountered Fox News and Rush Limbaugh fans like 55-year-old Scott Brian Haven, a Utah health-insurance salesman, who “viewed Democrats, government bureaucrats, and members of the media like me as any combination of Communists, traitors, swamp creatures, and human scum.”

Haven was sentenced in March 2020 for making just shy of 4,000 calls to the Capitol switchboard threatening violence against House and Senate Democrats.

“I am going to take up my Second Amendment right, and shoot you liberals in the head, you pussy, fuck you!” was just one.

When confronted by FBI agents in the summer of 2018, Haven recited the Gospel according to Limbaugh: “Conservatives don’t commit violent acts against political opponents. That type of behavior is conducted by people on the left.”

“This party has lost its damn mind,” Rep. Adam Kinzinger said during planning for the House investigation on Jan. 6. Kinzinger’s party now trafficks in “dangerous, dehumanizing lies,” Draper writes. MAGA Republicans have established a cottage industry “that promotes delusions en masse” the way Oprah gave away cars. Fraud is under everyone’s chair.

Draper writes in The Atlantic:

What happens to a political party when it becomes unhinged from objective truth? A couple of weeks ago, I received a phone call from a woman who until recently had served in a position of regional prominence in the Texas Republican Party. The woman had read something I’d written pertaining to the insurrection at the Capitol and found it to be thoroughly inaccurate. She wished to inform me that friends of hers had been there on January 6 and had seen nothing remotely riotous taking place. But, the woman added, whatever violence had occurred that day had been the work of antifa. She then said that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s videotaped phone conversations that afternoon, in which she implored governors to deploy National Guard troops to the Capitol, had been entirely staged. The woman closed by declaring that those who remained in federal custody for January 6–related offenses were being “politically persecuted.” When I asked her where she had gotten all this information, the woman replied that she had done her own research.

Throughout her monologue, the woman sounded completely sure of herself, unswerving in her belief that the violence I had witnessed firsthand on January 6 was entirely made up but was in any event understandable, given her certainty that the 2020 election was stolen. That self-certitude is what has stayed with me, more than the rambling illogic. I wish I knew what it would take for her and millions of her MAGA compatriots to one day be disabused of their shared delusions—to look back in chagrined amazement and say, as Scott Haven did in the federal courtroom, “This wasn’t me. This wasn’t me.”

You are living through a mass insanity history will record. Remember how it feels. Let us hope we all survive to read about it.

Paint the beautiful tomorrow

People have enough problems of their own

Democrats suck at messaging. So, many first-time campaign volunteers want to write the white paper that will remake the Democratic Party. From our redoubt in North Carolina, they imagine their message will spread and win elections nationwide for candidates who don’t know them from Adam and have no reason to listen. Democrats’ leadership would rather their candidates listen to (and spend campaign funds with) the incestuous, old-boy network of former Hill and state capitol denizens I call the campaign industrial complex.

Anat Shenker-Osorio, who lives in Oakley Oakland, Calif., is sometimes called Democrats’ Frank Luntz. Luntz is the Republican dial-testing message maven. And those would-be amateurs? Good luck. Democrats don’t listen to their Luntz, Anand Giridharadas writes in “The Persuaders: At the Front Lines of the Fight for Hearts, Minds, and Democracy.” Maybe his new book finally will persuade them to.

Slowly, painfully slowly, Democrats may be finally getting religion. Among her one-liners is “Sell the brownie, not the recipe.” And “Don’t take your policy out in public. It’s unseemly.” A message your base won’t repeat for you is not a good message. The problem with progressive messaging is so much “Have I got a problem for you” when people have plenty of their own. They don’t want yours, Shenker-Osorio says.

Instead, “Paint the beautiful tomorrow.” Say what you’re for. Help people see it.

An example she found inspiring was video from a Kenosha, Wis. block party organized in the wake of the police shooting of Jacob Blake in 2020. The community meant to contrast its vision of itself with the frightening one sent during President Donald Trump’s visit in the wake of rioting there. When Joe Biden’ presidential campaign issued a video statement, he focused on a law-and-order message that appalled Shenker-Osorio. Burned-out cars, charred buildings, police firing tear gas, etc. Biden was reinforcing Trump’s “American carnage” message. And no mention of the police killings that sparked the violence.

Progressives always seem over-impressed with their own smarts. Slow learners, they believe facts will win the day. They don’t. Another of those misattributed quotes views the world differently: They may forget what you said or did, but they will never forget how you made them feel.

Republicans want you to feel fear. Democrats need to respond with hope, a message, you may recall, that the first black president rode to the White House. Paint the beautiful tomorrow.

A campaign spot released yesterday by Rep. Graig Meyer, a friend running for N.C. state Senate, gets it right. Start with a shared value. Call out the villains. Paint a picture of the future Democrats want to create.

“Our light should never go out,” says Meyer.

Giridharadas on Thursday invited more messages like that.

https://twitter.com/AnandWrites/status/1585739904059068416

Shenker-Osorio replied with a couple.

Shenker-Osorio sat down next to me the first morning at Netroots-Detroit (2014). She was giddy. She’d arrived in town the night before and went out to eat. Sen. Elizabeth Warren walked into the restaurant and was seated a table or two away. Their eyes met. Warren mouthed, “I read your book.” Anat was still bouncing in her chair the next morning.

That was eight years ago. Maybe the lightbulbs are finally coming on.

It isn’t just COVID that’s killing them

More evidence of red state mortality risk

Maybe instead of having fits about the so-called Great Replacement Theory and worrying about taco trucks on every corner, they ought to do something about killing their own voters:

Americans die younger in conservative states than in those governed by liberals, a new study has found.

The authors wrote: “Simulations indicate that changing all policy domains in all states to a fully liberal orientation might have saved 171,030 lives in 2019, while changing them to a fully conservative orientation might have cost 217,635 lives.”

The study was published on Plos One, “an inclusive journal community working together to advance science for the benefit of society, now and in the future”.

The authors are from Syracuse University in New York, Harvard in Massachusetts, Virginia Commonwealth University, the University of Washington, the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Western Ontario, in Canada.

They wrote: “Results show that the policy domains were associated with working-age mortality.”

Bucking the trend, the study found that “more conservative marijuana policies” were associated with lower mortality rates.

But it also found that “more liberal policies on the environment, gun safety, labour, economic taxes and tobacco taxes in a state were associated with lower mortality in that state”.

They added: “Especially strong associations were observed between certain domains and specific causes of death: between the gun safety domain and suicide mortality among men, between the labour domain and alcohol-induced mortality, and between both the economic tax and tobacco tax domains and CVD [cardiovascular] mortality.”

According to the National Council of State Legislatures, as of June this year Republicans controlled 61% of state legislatures and Democrats 35%. In terms of whole state governments, Republicans controlled 46% and Democrats 12%, with 12 states divided.

The study authors also noted that American life expectancy as a whole is lower than in most high-income countries, “fall[ing] between … Cuba and Albania”.

If the show was on the other foot, right wingers would be screeching, “they’re bringing down our numbers!”

I guess we’re not allowed to say anything about this (even as they are out there proclaiming blue cities to be depraved hellscapes) because it would be insensitive. But let’s face it — plenty of our fellow Americans who are living in these places aren’t political. And may others are our allies who just happen to be in the minority — Black people in the south being at the top of the list. And children. Policies in those states are killing them and it isn’t their choice. It’s a travesty.

Remember when they called themselves the moral majority?

Look at them now.

Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel on Thursday mocked the speaking abilities of Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, the Pennsylvania Democratic Senate candidate who is recovering from a stroke, and President Biden, who grew up with a stutter.

McDaniel was interviewed by syndicated radio host Hugh Hewitt about news that Biden and Vice President Harris plan to appear at a political event in Philadelphia on Friday intended to boost Fetterman and other Pennsylvania Democrats on the ballot.

“No one wants them except a doomed campaign,” Hewitt said, suggesting that Democrats around the country have asked Biden and Harris to stay away.

“I do not underestimate what the triple toxicity politically of those three can do,” Hewitt, a Washington Post contributing columnist, continued. “I hope there are cameras and microphones, because you put those three together and they could say anything, Ronna.”

“Well, maybe they can get a full sentence out,” McDaniel replied.

McDaniel indicated that she agreed with Hewitt about the undesirability of campaigning with Biden and Harris, speculating that Fetterman “drew the short straw.”

“I think all the candidates got together and said, ‘Which one of us has to campaign with Biden?’ [Fetterman] drew the short straw,” McDaniel said.

She added, “So Biden said, ‘Between the two of us, we may be able to finish a full sentence.’ ”

Trump famously mocked a disabled reporter during the 2016 campaign and apparently has normalized that too. What must these people’s children be like?

Bannon threatens Dr Fauci

Also his family

I don’t know how many listeners Steve Bannon has but I do know that all the top luminaries of the Republican Party appear on his podcast. In that respect he’s picked up where Rush Limbaugh left off as an important megaphone for the GOP to speak to its base. (Limbaugh single-handedly poisoned the discourse but I don’t recall him literally making threats against public figures. I may be wrong about that though.) Therefore, despite the fact that he’s an incredible scumbag, it’s important to keep up with what he’s on about.

We know that he ginned up the flock before January 6th and was in on whatever planning went into the violence. And almost immediately afterwards he was exhorting his audience to start running for local election offices and harassing the existing officials to ensure they can cannot lose.

Here he is threatening Fauci:

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon has issued a threat to Anthony Fauci, saying the president’s chief medical adviser and his entire family are going to “suffer” after the midterm elections next month.

“On 8 November, when we destroy the Democratic party as a national political institution and really end the regime, the hunted become the hunters. The whole Fauci family is going to be welcome to the investigations. The entire family,” Mr Bannon said on his War Room podcast on Sunday.

A clip of his podcast was shared on Twitter by attorney and analyst Ron Filipkowski.

“Remember, War Room was taken off Twitter because of comments I made about, wait for it, [FBI director] Christopher Wray and Anthony Fauci that their day was coming… they took the War Room account off Twitter. Paybacks across the board on all that, a big move,” Mr Bannon said.

[…]

This is not the first time Mr Bannon has lashed out at Dr Fauci.

The director of the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, who is set to step down soon, had faced a slew of attacks from Mr Bannon and several other right-wing commentators during the Covid pandemic.

In November 2020, Mr Bannon said a second term for Donald Trump should start by displaying the severed heads of Dr Fauci and Mr Wray on the White House “as a warning”.

“Now I actually want to go a step farther, but I realise the president is a kind-hearted man and a good man,” Mr Bannon had said. “I’d actually like to go back to the old times of Tudor England, I’d put the heads on pikes, right, I’d put them at the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats. You either get with the programme or you’re gone – time to stop playing games.”

Dr Fauci has had a security detail since April 2020 amid threats from supporters of Mr Trump and far-right groups that have opposed Covid public health measures.

This is so sick I don’t know what to say about it. Bannon got a slap on the wrist for defying a congressional subpoena and nothing will be done about him publicly threatening a health official and his family because well … we are apparently just prisoners of these fascist monsters and it’s no big deal.

This man hosts the top officials of the GOP. Here’s Ronna McDaniel, chair of the RNC. They are endorsing his toxic swill:

Violent threats from major right wing figures is just a normal part of life now. Gee, I wonder where that might lead?


Good News you won’t hear much about

The MSM seems determined to down play the latest economic report

This is from economist Dean Baker, who is not one to blow smoke:

GDP Shows Healthy Growth in Third Quarter, Driven by a Shrinking Trade Deficit

The economy grew 2.6 percent in the third quarter, a sharp turnaround from two quarters of negative growth in the first half of the year. A shrinking trade deficit was the biggest factor, adding 2.77 percentage points to the quarter’s growth. This was more than enough to offset the a sharp decline in residential construction and slowing inventory accumulation, which subtracted 1.37 percentage points and 0.7 percentage points from growth, respectively.

Normal Growth Means Respectable Productivity Growth

The 2.6 percent GDP growth reported for the quarter, coupled with near flat growth in hours (the number of self-employed declined sharply in the quarter), is likely to mean that productivity grew at close to a 2.0 percent annual rate in the third quarter.

This comes after an unprecedented pace of decline in the first half of the year, with productivity dropping at a 7.1 percent annual rate in the first quarter and a 4.1 percent annual rate in the second quarter. These declines were likely attributable to a variety of factors including the winter omicron wave, rapid turnover in the labor market, and supply chain disruptions. But whatever the causes, we seem to be back on a path of normal productivity growth, which will alleviate inflationary pressure in the economy.

Inflation Edged Downward

The core PCE rose at an annual rate of 4.5 percent in Q3, down from 5.6 percent in Q1 and 4.7 percent in Q2. While the 4.5 percent pace is well above the Fed’s 2.0 percent target, the direction of change is noteworthy. If inflation were being driven largely by an excessively tight labor market, then inflation should be accelerating, not slowing.

Saving Rate Fell, but Main Factor is Higher Capital Gains Taxes

The saving rate edged lower in the quarter to 3.3 percent of disposable income from 3.4 percent in the second quarter. That compares to a saving rate of 8.8 percent of disposable income in 2019 before the pandemic.

This has been generally portrayed as people spending down the savings they accumulated during the pandemic. While this is true to some extent, the biggest factor is that people are paying more taxes, presumably capital gains taxes on stocks they sold in the last year. (Capital gains are not counted as income.)

The tax share of personal income rose from 11.8 percent in 2019 to 14.7 percent in the third quarter. If the tax share of personal income had remained constant, the saving rate would have been more than 3.0 percentage points higher in the third quarter.

Consumption of Goods Fell, While Services Continue to Increase

We are continuing to see a reversal of the pandemic shift from service consumption to good consumption. Consumption of goods fell at a 1.2 percent annual rate, with the biggest factor being a sharp drop in car purchases, but real spending on gas and food also declined.

Consumption of services grew at a 2.8 percent annual rate, down from a 4.6 percent pace in the second quarter. This increase led to a 1.4 percent growth pace for consumption overall. The growth rate for services is only moderately higher than we had been seeing before the pandemic, so we are not seeing a story of massive catch up following the pandemic.

Health Care Spending Continues to Fall as a Share of GDP

Medical spending continued to edge lower as a share of GDP. It is now 0.7 pp lower than the 2019 share. Since the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services had projected 0.2 pp increase per year, we are now 1.3pp below trend. This is equivalent to $325 billion in annual savings on health care spending.

Residential Construction Falls at a 26.4 Percent Annual Rate

The falloff in residential construction accelerated in the third quarter, declining at a 26.4 percent rate after dropping at 17.8 percent rate in the second quarter. This is consistent with monthly data showing a sharp decline in housing starts, although construction has not fallen to the same extent, as builders still have a large backlog of homes to finish.

Another factor in the decline is the end of the mortgage refinancing boom. The fees associated with refinancing are counted in this category. The larger category that includes these fees fell at a 40.7 percent annual rate in the quarter.

Investment Growth Remains Strong

Equipment investment returned to double digit growth, increasing at a 10.8 percent annual rate after a small decline in Q2. Investment in intellectual products also remains healthy, growing at a 6.9 percent rate. This was more than enough to offset the continuing decline in investment in non-residential structures, which fell at a 15.3 percent rate. Non-residential investment as whole grew at a 3.7 percent rate.

Inventory Accumulation Returns to Normal

Inventories subtracted 0.7 pp from growth in the quarter, but still grew at a $61.9 billion annual rate. Since inventories had been growing at an extraordinary pace in the prior three quarters, this meant that the third quarter pace was a drag on GDP growth. With many retailers reporting excessive inventories, we may see further slowing, and possibly even declines, in the next two quarters.

The buildup of inventories is good news from the standpoint of inflation, as many retailers will have to markdown prices to move merchandise. On the negative side, farm inventories fell at a $22.9 billion annual rate, continuing a long pattern of declines. This could mean that inflation in food prices will persist.

Exports Surged, but Growth Is not Likely to Continue

Exports rose at a 14.4 percent annual rate in the third quarter after rising at a 13.8 percent rate in the second quarter. This added 1.63 pp to growth in the quarter. Imports fell at a 6.9 percent rate, adding 1.14 pp to growth in the quarter.

The export surge is unlikely to continue. With the economies of most of our major trading partners weakening, and likely falling into recession, they will be buying less from the United States. The surge in the dollar was also act to make our goods less competitive, further dampening exports and raising imports.

Third Quarter Looks Very Good

The overall picture in the third quarter GDP report is overwhelmingly positive. The economy is on a path of healthy growth again. Furthermore, it looks like inflation is slowing, albeit slowly. Furthermore, the return to positive productivity growth indicates that many of the problems with reopening from the pandemic are behind us and the economy will look much more normal going forward.

However, the Fed’s rate hikes will slow the economy further in future quarters. We are unlikely to see a comparable boost to growth from net exports in the next few quarters. Residential construction will contract further and we may again see drags on growth from inventories, if retailers look to pare back their stockpiles.

In short, this is a very good picture, but one with many clear warning signs.

Most of the drop in the saving rate is due to capital gains taxes, not people spending their savings.

Mike Konczol added this:

(Dotted lines are projections, solid line is real GDP. In the 1st graph, the solid line returns to the 1st dotted line – there was no permanent decrease in GDP. In the 2nd graph, from the Great Recession, GDP growth never returns to the original dotted line; permanent GDP loss)

You would not know any of this from the economic reporting.

It’s too late for good numbers to lift the Democratic election campaign. It takes a while for improvements to sink in. And with the media furiously flogging the inflation story, even though it’s improved greatly, people just haven’t absorbed it. At this point we have to just hope that some form of morning in America is happening that will at least save the Democrats from Donald Trump in 2024.

And aside from all the politics, it would be nice if people could start to feel a bit of emotional relief from the chaos and trauma of the last few years. A good economy with plentiful jobs and opportunities can go a long way toward doing that. People just have to start actually feeling it.


Marcy Wheeler on Durham

She comes to bury him not to praise him

And she does:

In the wake of special counsel John Durham’s embarrassing second acquittal earlier this month, Durham’s fans—from theWall Street Journal editorial page to former Attorney General Bill Barr to Donald Trump himself—have tried to justify Durham’s work by claiming he disclosed corruption.

Perhaps he did. But whose? Indeed, the Durham fiasco has disclosed, first and foremost, how much damage Republicans are willing to do in an attempt to deny the results of Robert Mueller’s own special counsel investigation.

Barr appointed Durham immediately after the Mueller investigation finished, over 40 months ago. At the time, there was no evidence a crime had been committed. The sole explanation Barr offered in his memoir was that “I still had to launch US Attorney John Durham’s investigation into the genesis of this bogus scandal.” Thus far, the only scalp Durham can claim is that of an FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email, but even there, that crime was discovered by a Justice Department inspector general investigation, one that found no evidence that politics affected Mueller’s investigation.

Durham’s own investigations have flopped. In June, a District of Columbia jury found lawyer Michael Sussmann not guilty of lying to hide a tie between the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and a tip about some cybersecurity anomalies Sussmann shared with the FBI in September 2016. Then, after the government finished its case, a Republican-appointed judge ruled that Durham had charged the primary source for Christopher Steele’s dossier, Igor Danchenko, with lying even though the alleged false statement was “literally true.” Then a jury did the rest. It acquitted the Russian analyst of four additional charges. Forty months in, two juries and a judge concluded Durham had proven no crime.

Trump once bragged that Durham was going to uncover “the crime of the century.” But for all the right-wing celebration of purportedly momentous new disclosures, the most stunning revelations from the Danchenko trial were details of how Barr and Senator Lindsey Graham recklessly demanded the release of Danchenko’s first FBI interview report, which led directly to his exposure and ruin as an FBI source. After Danchenko helped the FBI to vet (and discredit) the Steele dossier in 2017, he served as an FBI source for over three years. By the time Barr and Graham burned Danchenko, he had contributed to 25 FBI investigations across six field offices. “Losing Mr. Danchenko as a confidential human source harmed national security,” his handling agent Kevin Helson agreed with Danchenko’s lawyers at trial. As Helson described, Danchenko was even “reporting on some things that were against Trump.”

Durham’s twin trials also revealed how much deceit it takes to sustain the fairy tales the Barr-appointed special counsel was spinning for Fox News’s audiences. Durham got an FBI agent to testify incorrectly that Danchenko believed he had received a phone call from Sergei Millian on a cell phone; when Danchenko’s lawyer instructed the agent simply to turn the page of a trial exhibit and keep reading, the agent corrected his testimony to note that Danchenko had said the call may have come on a mobile app. The agent agreed with Danchenko’s attorney that “we all know that [the testimony Durham elicited is] false.”

Prosecutor Brittain Shaw elicited false testimony about whether an FBI analyst had used information Danchenko provided to pitch an investigation into one of his associates. “I was absolutely not trying to lie,” Amy Anderson insisted, when shown a document that proved Danchenko had in fact provided information Shaw claimed he had hidden. Durham even tried to elicit false testimony to suggest that Danchenko had been asked—ever!—about a report at the core of one charge against him. He did so by pointing to a different, earlier Christopher Steele project, suggesting it was the Democratic-funded dossier.

Durham’s boosters claim he has exposed the failures of the Crossfire Hurricane FBI team that was probing links between the Trump campaign and Russia. But the biggest 2016-related failure revealed at the trials showed that two cybersecurity agents who first analyzed anomalies associated with Russia’s Alfa Bank misrepresented their timing and never reviewed key data. As a result, the FBI dismissed the anomalies without answering key questions about them. “The FBI didn’t necessarily do everything right here,” prosecutor Andrew DeFilippis said, admitting his own witnesses’ investigative failures to the Sussmann jury. “They missed opportunities. They made mistakes.” One of the agents who blew it accurately predicted that “any chance you get to work something like this that truly has [zero] repercussions if you mess it up.” He is among the only FBI agents involved in a Russia investigation in 2016 that Barr’s DOJ didn’t punish for their involvement.

Besides, Durham’s own investigative failures were far more stunning than anything described at trial. First, he never asked DOJ’s inspector general for relevant evidence until after he indicted Michael Sussmann. That led Durham to rediscover something he had been told four years earlier but claimed to have forgotten: The inspector general had cell phones from his key witness. The inspector general also provided meeting notes by FBI witnesses disproving the case against Sussmann. And only in this same period months after the indictment did Durham ask his key witness to review what he had in his own iCloud account; along with one text that showed Durham had charged the wrong date, the witness found evidence that Sussmann helped the FBI kill a New York Times story about the Alfa Bank anomaly, something that undercut all Durham’s claims about Sussmann’s motive for sharing the tip with the FBI.

Even Durham’s case against Danchenko showed investigative shortcomings. Durham proudly had his case agent describe the laborious work the team did to rule out that Danchenko had received a telephone call from Sergei Millian, but described nothing that would rule out a call using a mobile app—an egregious oversight for any prosecutor, especially one in such a high-profile case.

It took a June Roger Stone interview of George Papadopoulos to reveal that Durham never interviewed Trump’s former campaign aide. Durham didn’t interview Papadopoulos before he and the attorney general flew to Italy chasing some of Papadopoulos’s baseless theories about the genesis of the investigation. Durham didn’t interview Papadopoulos in conjunction with the Danchenko case, which would have shown that Millian was setting up meetings in New York City via an iPad during precisely the period Durham claimed such coordination was impossible. He didn’t interview Papadopoulos to understand what Papadopoulos meant when he described Millian as “a very shady kind of person” in 2018 congressional testimony that Durham did rely on.

Durham doesn’t need to do a report to show what an incompetent investigation looks like: His team modeled it.

All these failures culminated, in Durham’s closing argument in the Danchenko case, in an outright lie about the Mueller investigation. “Reflect on how this came about,” Durham said, attempting to rationalize his own investigation to the jury. “Director Mueller, a patriotic American, the former director of the FBI, concludes there’s no evidence of collusion here or conspiracy.”

This misstates Mueller’s conclusion. True, Mueller did not charge any Trump associate with a conspiracy relating to 2016. But Meuller also explicitly said, “A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts … does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In other words, Mueller specifically pre-butted what Durham said about there being “no evidence,” but Durham went ahead and said it anyway—and to a jury. Then he used his false claim that Mueller had found no evidence of conspiracy to ask, “Is it the wrong question to ask, well, then how did [the Mueller investigation] get started?”

Durham, of course, has likewise not charged any conspiracy, in spite of Trump’s promises that there was one.

And whereas two juries rejected Durham’s accusations that people lied to the FBI in connection with sharing tips tying Trump to Russia (neither of which, incidentally, was the genesis of the Russia-Trump investigation), Mueller did show that five top Trump associates lied to cover up their 2016 ties to Russia.

Trump’s “coffee boy,” Papadopoulos, admitted he lied about when he got advance notice of Russia’s plans to help Trump. Trump’s national security adviser, Mike Flynn, confessed that he lied about how he undermined several of President Obama’s foreign policy efforts on a series of calls with the Russian ambassador. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, admitted that he lied to Congress to hide the direct contact he had with the Kremlin in pursuit of an impossibly lucrative real estate deal. A judge found that Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, lied about a meeting with a man—since sanctioned as a “known Russian Intelligence Services agent”—where he shared campaign strategy and discussed plans to carve up Ukraine. And a jury found that Trump’s dirty trickster, Roger Stone, lied about the true nature of his back channel to the Russian hack-and-leak effort. All the Barr misrepresentations and all the failed prosecutions and all the Trump pardons cannot erase Mueller’s results.

The Durham crowd wants to justify a 40-month investigation that found not a single new crime by pointing to disclosures the special counsel made. Fine, let’s do that. Those disclosures show that Republicans willfully damaged national security in a failed attempt to make Mueller’s damning revelations go away.

The Russia hoax hoax has been a joke from the moment Trump announced the probe into the “oranges of the investigation.” Yet it went. And on. As these things always do. This one went on far longer than the Mueller investigations which resulted in multiple convictions and revelations of egregious criminal behavior on the part of top members of Trump’s campaign.

But Durham is writing a report and I expect it to be doozy of innuendo and calumny. That will be enough to appease Trump’s flock, I’m sure. They don’t really need proof for anything they believe.

Schadenfreude alert

Sit back and enjoy

It’s on:

Multiple people close to Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) are reportedly angry at former President Donald Trump for throwing a rally in Florida two days before the election.

Trump announced a Nov. 6 rally in Miami for Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) Wednesday evening in an email to his followers.

“President Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America, hosts a ‘Get Out the Vote Rally’ in support of endorsed candidate and special guest Senator Marco Rubio in Florida, where his 2022 endorsement record is currently undefeated, 19-0,” a statement read. It added:

President Trump delivered a historic red wave for Florida in the 2018 midterms with his slate of endorsed candidates up and down the ballot and molded the Sunshine State into the MAGA stronghold it is today. Thanks to President Trump, Florida is no longer a purple state; it’s an America First Red State.

Notably absent was the name DeSantis, who won Florida in 2018 by a razor-thin margin with Trump’s endorsement.

According to Politico, some of the governor’s staffers are angry:

The apparent snub angered some people within DeSantis’ orbit, who complained that the Florida governor’s team was not informed of the rally prior to Trump announcing it. The timing of the Trump and Rubio event means any campaign event DeSantis holds that day won’t get as much attention during the all-important final stretch of the 2022 midterms.

One person close to DeSantis said Trump is “hijacking” a crucial day from DeSantis, who might or might not challenge him for the GOP nomination for president in 2024.

“You’ve got the Sunday before Election Day totally hijacked by Trump parachuting in on Trump Force One taking up the whole day,” someone described as a consultant said. “No Republican could go to a DeSantis event that day. None. And DeSantis won’t be here? This is big.”

Another person who was reported to be close to DeSantis said the Miami rally is an “an elbow to Ron’s throat.”

Now flog the hell out of it, Democrats

Any good news in a storm

CNBC (emphasis mine):

The U.S. economy posted its first period of positive growth for 2022 in the third quarter, at least temporarily easing inflation fears, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported Thursday.

GDP, a sum of all the goods and services produced from July through September, increased at a 2.6% annualized pace for the period, against the Dow Jones estimate for 2.3%.

But wait! There’s more:

Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial average gained on Thursday after the economy grew at a faster-than-expected pace in the third quarter.

Dow Jones Industrial Average futures climbed 345 points, or 1.1%. S&P 500 futures added 0.4%. Nasdaq 100 futures were lower by 0.1%.

U.S. GDP increased increased at a 2.6% annualized pace for the period, against the Dow Jones estimate for 2.3% growth. The report, the first quarter of positive growth for 2022, eased investors’ concerns about a recession.

Yes, it’s all technical. Yes, experts don’t expect the trend to continue. Typical Americans won’t feel any different about inflation or their grocery bills. But with so much on the line on November 8, the least Democrats can do is trumpet the good news while acknowledging more needs to be done. They need the break.

Especially since Republicans have no plan of their own to fight inflation.

Gen Z will vote at 2018 levels

Or maybe better?

Harvard’s Kennedy School releases its 44th youth poll:

A national poll released today by the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School indicates that 40% of 18-to-29-year-olds state that they will “definitely” vote in the November 8 midterm elections, on track to match or potentially exceed the record-breaking 2018 youth turnout in a midterm election. Young voters prefer Democratic control of Congress 57% to 31% (up five points for Democrats since spring), but 12% remain undecided. 

President Biden’s job approval has dropped again to 39% among young Americans, down from 41% in the IOP Spring 2022 poll and down 20 percentage points since our first spring poll after President Biden took office. There is a 20-point job approval gap among those who report that they follow the news closely (48% approve) vs. those who do not follow the news (28%). 

The poll finds that nearly 40% of Republicans cited inflation as the most important issue driving their midterm vote; Democrats are moved by abortion (20%), protecting democracy (20%), inflation (19%), and climate change (16%). More than 7-in-10 young Americans (72%) believe that the rights of others are under attack, and 59% believe that their own rights are under attack. 

Kennedy School director John Della Volpe believes we will see a Gen Z wave in November. “Youth today vote at levels that far exceed millennials, Gen X, and baby boomers when they were under 30.”

The U.S. Census reported this (below) about 2018 midterm voting by age.

That’s all good news. But it’s hard to see that reflexive midterm-to-midterm comparisons hold up after the Trump years. It’s how polling business as usual is done. But I have to hope this election will not be business as usual. The 2018 midterm turnout was blow-out. Reporting celebrated the spike in the youth vote.

In the 2020 presidential election, voters 18-29 voted in even greater numbers than in 2018: closer to 50%. I don’t want to harsh Gen Z’s buzz, but as upbeat as the Harvard video is, if turnout by younger voters is in the 40% range, that’s not something to celebrate. Younger voters are still leaving a lot of power on the table. Oldsters outvote them by over 15 points.

The image you’ve seen again and again makes that graphically clear. The data do not apply just in North Carolina.

The power is right there waiting for people to close their fingers around it.