Skip to content

Month: November 2022

The right wing lone wolf terrorist threat

It’s global

Andrew Leak, 66, from High Wycombe
Image caption,Police identified the man who carried out the attack as Andrew Leak, 66, from High Wycombe

This is from the UK:

The firebombing of an immigration processing centre was motivated by extreme right-wing terrorist ideology, police have said. Andrew Leak, 66, from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, threw up to three incendiary devices at the site in Dover, Kent, last Sunday. He is believed to have later taken his own life.

Counter Terrorism Policing South East (CTPSE) said evidence showed it “was motivated by a terrorist ideology”. Tim Jacques, senior national co-ordinator for counter terrorism policing, said: “After considering the evidence collected so far, whilst there are strong indications that mental health was likely a factor, I am satisfied that the suspect’s actions were primarily driven by an extremist ideology.

“This meets the threshold for a terrorist incident.”

Leak was not known to counter-terrorism police before the attack, CPTSE confirmed. It is understood he was also not known to the security services. A now-deleted Facebook account apparently in Leak’s name contained anti-Muslim sentiments. Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper tweeted: “Very serious that far right extremism drove this attack.

“I remain concerned that it took so long for counter terror police to take lead on this case. “There must be highest vigilance on potential terror or extremist attacks.”Two members of staff at the centre were left with minor injuries after police were called at 11:22 GMT on Sunday morning.

Following the attack about 700 migrants were transferred from Dover to the processing centre at Manston, where overcrowded conditions had already been severely criticised by government inspectors.

A police statement on Saturday said: “A number of significant witnesses have been spoken to during the course of the investigation and a number of items of interest have been recovered, including digital media devices. “Evidence from examining these items suggests there was an extreme right-wing motivation behind the attack.”

I haven’t seen any evidence that their right wing political leaders are passing around conspiracy theories or making jokes about it but I may have just missed it. Our right wingers are a little bit less reticent to endorse terrorism apparently.

Little victories

It’s always something

It’s the last day of early voting here and Friday was a gangbusters day for it. It’s hard to know what Nov. 8 will bring, but Marc Elias has a few small victories from Nov. 3 to celebrate. It’s the small stuff far from the Beltway that can have big impact:

The day began with a 5-2 decision from the Michigan Supreme Court pausing a lower court’s decision that blocked rules regulating the behavior of partisan election challengers and poll watchers, which means that the rules are back in effect for the midterm elections. The rules, put forth by Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D), are commonsense guidelines aimed at ensuring partisan election challengers can observe the voting and vote-counting process without becoming disruptive. The court’s decision will undoubtedly mean a more orderly, less chaotic Election Day, which can only serve to increase voter participation and confidence.

Next came a decision from Nevada rejecting a Republican motion to insert partisan election workers into the signature verification process for mail-in ballots. The Republican Party sued Clark County, Nevada’s largest county, to require its election office to hire Republicans to review the signatures on mail-in ballot return envelopes. As far back as 2020, Republicans in the Silver State have complained, without evidence, that the signature verification process used by the state fails to reject ballots with signatures that do not match voters’ signatures on file. The GOP’s proposed solution in this lawsuit was to require the county to intentionally hire Republican partisan workers who — the party hopes — would reject more ballots in the predominantly Democratic county. One week after Republicans filed their request, the court rejected it. An appeal is likely.

https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1588341354425421827?s=20&t=ifaikCcTZxrmZX–YRZ1eQ

Republicans are trying to break the system to say it’s broken, observes Chris Hayes.

Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, a federal district court granted a joint motion that addressed shortcomings in York County, Pennsylvania’s provision of election materials and assistance to its Spanish-speaking population. According to the complaint, York County has a large Puerto Rican community that was not receiving election materials in their native language. Under the terms of the order, York County agreed to remedy this by providing Spanish-language assistance and materials in the upcoming elections.

Finally, late in the day, a mere two days after a lawsuit was filed, a New York state court ordered Duchess County to designate a polling location on Vassar College’s campus for the 2022 midterm elections. Under New York law, counties are required to provide on-campus polling locations at any college with more than 300 registered voters. Even though Vassar easily exceeds this threshold, the Republican member of the county’s election board refused to allow the county to meet its obligation. While this decision was appealed by the Republican commissioner,  as of now Vassar students, faculty, staff and families will now have access to a convenient polling location in compliance with state law.

Every year it’s something else, and the something elses are multiplying. I once sat through an hour of T-partiers arguing with the board of elections what election law wasn’t but should be (in their opinion). Quote them the Supreme Court ruling? Quote them statute chapter and verse? Doesn’t matter.

Glad to have Elias out there fighting.

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Please go vote and take family and friends.

All the king’s tantrums

Right wing declares freedom of association a communist plot

How appropriate. Elon Musk’s Twitter profile photo.

Elon Musk’s Twitter financing woes have right-wing panties and brain stems in knots. Lesser vassals’ economic catechism, like their patriotism, is a mile wide and an inch deep. It was ever thus.

Ridicule came thick and fast.

“Dude, free speech is deciding where you spend your money. You made Twitter about you and millions think you are an untrustworthy and unstable narcissist and don’t want to help bail you out of a dumb deal driven by ego. You’re not a victim. Suck it up.” — Stuart Stevens, former Republican and author of “It Was All a Lie

Since when did the viability of an oligarch’s capitalist venture become everyone else’s responsibility? And other capitalists’ responsibility? Is Musk really equating Twitter’s survival with the First Amendment? Is he arguing it should be a public utility? Is he asking Joe Biden for a GM-style federal bailout? After he’s already laid off half his staff?

Lost your sponsors? Talk to the Invisible Hand!

And is Sen. Ted Cruz, too?

Molly Jong-Fast (The Atlantic andVogue) and others shot back at Sen. Ted Cruz’s hand-wringing.

The former chief of staff to Sen. Mitch McConnell is verklempt. He wants jittery Twitter advertisers hauled before Congress for protecting their brands from taint. Imagine what MAGA Republicans will do if given full control of Congress.

That tweet from Josh Holmes drew some pithy reactions.

“So it turns out that the decades of @GOP claims about less government and less interference with private and business decisions were all lies.” — David Cay Johnston, investigative journalist

“Hey Josh, are your Republican friends in Congress considering a law banning companies from canceling ads with Twitter? Just curious, since hearings are supposed to be related to legislation.” — Dean Baker, Senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research

“Ron DeSantis wants credit for the brilliant Republican strategy of attacking corporations as commies leftist pinkos. — Ed Walker of emptywheel

TPM‘s Josh Marshall has some experience with advertising in a political environment. He provided a primer in advertiser behavior for righties who prefer their capitalists compliant:

Let’s say a few words about “brand safety”. Musk and top Republican leaders are now complaining that the problem is “woke” activists breaking Twitter and pushing it toward financial collapse. Nope. That’s not it. Not remotely. Are there people pushing for boycotts or …

“pauses”? Absolutely. But that’s not why Twitter is in trouble. It’s not just that advertisers don’t want their ads showing up next to Kanye West ranting about how his Jewish doctor wanted to have him eliminated. It goes way beyond that. Advertisers don’t want to be …

near controversy. And they don’t even want to be near things that are upsetting or agitating. This is why ALL political media faces an inverse premium in advertising because the content is inherently polarizing. You can sell the same ads, watched by the same number of …

people and actually the same people and you can get more money if the content is fashion or parenthood or entertainment than if it’s politics. It’s because there’s hate speech or terrible things. But advertisers won’t [sp] you to see their ads in a good moment, in a comfortable …

setting. Here’s an example. Why do you think even in his heyday Drudge never had better than low rent, crap ads, and tshirt and supplement ads on his site. Mostly because even though it was a hugely hugely popular site premium advertisers just don’t want to be near something..

so hot and contentious. Half the people are hate reading anyway. There’s always a big inverse premium for uck and discomfort and controversy. That’s just how the ad business works. The nature of the advertising market is actually a big BIG reason for bothsides …

journalism. In a politically polarized society advertising are very VERY cautious about any hint they’re taking sides in the great political or factional debates. They want to put their odds in venues that are above any hint that they’re partisan or taking sides.

Advertisers tolerated Facebook’s sewer “because the power of the ad ecosystem was just too good. Twitter has never had that. It’s never been a particularly attractive ad buy.”

“If you want to run a fancy restaurant,” Marshall adds, “you don’t put an open air outhouse in the middle of the dining area. Just not how it works. Maybe it’s your thing. Not how it works. You don’t get the blame the people who say ewwww it’s way smelly.”

Spoiled children throwing tantrums in the middle of the restaurant are also bad for business (says former waiter).

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Please go vote and take family and friends.

Friday Night Soother

A little bit of zen for a stressful weekend

 

Courtesy of Tom Sullivan who is working his ass off this weekend getting out the vote in North Carolina for Cherie Beasley.

QOTD: Dan Crenshaw

How can he remain a Republican?

He knows they’re lying but apparently he thinks marginal tax breaks are more important. That says everything you need to know about Team Normal:

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) revealed what election deniers actually say behind closed doors as a slew of reality-defying candidates run as Republicans in next week’s 2022 midterms.

“It was always a lie. The whole thing was always a lie. And it was a lie meant to rile people up,” the Texas Republican said of the lie that Donald Trump was cheated by widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election during the latest episode of his “Hold These Truths” podcast.

“I’ve talked about this ad nausea, it really made me angry,” the former Navy SEAL told election reform advocate Nick Troiano. “Because I’m like, the promises you’re making that you’re gonna challenge the Electoral College and overturn the election, there’s not even a process for you to do that. It doesn’t even exist.”

“So I was like, ‘What the hell are we doing?’ And I would tell that to people kinda behind closed doors too. Especially a lot of the rabble-rousers, like the political personalities, not even the politicians,” he said.

Crenshaw recalled “arguments behind closed doors in the Republican Party before that.”

The lawmaker continued:

But even just the others, they’re like, ‘Yeah, we know that, but we just, you know, people just need their last hurrah. Like, they just need to feel like we fought one last time. Trust me, it’ll be fine.’ And I was like, ‘No, it won’t. That’s not what people believe and that’s not what you’re telling them. And maybe you’re smart enough to know that but like …’ So we have a lot of people in the political world that are just willing to say things they know aren’t true, they know aren’t true. It’s a huge manipulation.

He’s right, of course. And they’re still doing it, including the people Crenshaw endorses, votes with and works for.

He’s trying to have it both ways and you simply can’t. If you walk with the anti-democratic authoritarians, you have made a choice.

“Under Republicans, not another penny will go to Ukraine. Our country comes first. They don’t care about our border or our people.” —Marjorie Taylor Green

She needs to STFU. What a dumb, arrogant and hostile creep, the worst of all possible worlds.

The AP and Frontline have done a documentary about the horrors Ukraine is suffering.It’s very hard to watch:

The first man arrived at 7:27 a.m. Russian soldiers covered his head and marched him up the driveway toward a nondescript office building.

Two minutes later, a pleading, gagged voice pierced the morning stillness. Then the merciless reply: “Talk! Talk, f–ing mother-f–er!”

The women and children came later, gripping hastily packed bags, their pet dogs in tow.

It was a cold, gray morning, March 4 in Bucha, Ukraine. Crows cawed. By nightfall, at least nine men would walk to their deaths at 144 Yablunska street, a building complex that Russians turned into a headquarters and the nerve center of violence that would shock the world.

In this image from March 4, 2022, surveillance video provided by the Ukrainian government, Russian troops lead nine men at gunpoint to their headquarters on Yablunska Street in Bucha, where they would be tortured and executed. (Ukrainian government via AP)

Later, when all the bodies were found strewn along the streets and packed in hasty graves, it would be easy to think the carnage was random. Residents asking how this happened would be told to make their peace, because some questions just don’t have answers.

Yet there was a method to the violence.

What happened that day in Bucha was what Russian soldiers on intercepted phone conversations called “zachistka” — cleansing. The Russians hunted people on lists prepared by their intelligence services and went door to door to identify potential threats. Those who didn’t pass this filtration, including volunteer fighters and civilians suspected of assisting Ukrainian troops, were tortured and executed, surveillance video, audio intercepts and interviews show.

The Associated Press and the PBS series “Frontline” obtained surveillance camera footage from Bucha that shows, for the first time, what a cleansing operation in Ukraine looks like. This was organized brutality that would be repeated at scale in Russian-occupied territories across Ukraine — a strategy to neutralize resistance and terrorize locals into submission that Russian troops have used in past conflicts, notably Chechnya.

The Associated Press, FRONTLINE and SITU Research reviewed hundreds of hours of CCTV footage, intercepts of Russian phone calls and built a 3D model to show what happened in Bucha and identify who was responsible.

Ukrainian prosecutors now say those responsible for the violence at 144 Yablunska were soldiers from the 76th Guards Airborne Assault Division. They are pursuing the commander, Maj. Gen. Sergei Chubarykin, and his boss, Col. Gen. Alexander Chaiko — a man known for his brutality as leader of Russia’s troops in Syria — for the crime of aggression for waging an illegal war.

Police ended up recovering nearly 40 bodies along Yablunska street alone. Prosecutors have identified 12 around 144 Yablunska; AP reporters documented a 13th body in the stairwell of one of the buildings in the complex, in photos and videos taken on April 3.

Taras Semkiv, Ukraine’s lead prosecutor for the 144 Yablunska street case, told the AP and “Frontline” that it’s unusual to see war crimes play out on video and that the CCTV footage and eyewitness accounts from March 4 are key elements for the prosecution.

“The results of the criminal evidence we’ve gathered so far reveal that it wasn’t just isolated incidents of military personnel making a mistake but a systematic policy targeting the Ukrainian people,” Semkiv said.

This story is part of an AP/FRONTLINE investigation that includes the War Crimes Watch Ukraine interactive experience and the documentary “ Putin’s Attack on Ukraine: Documenting War Crimes,” on PBS. The AP and “Frontline” reviewed hundreds of hours of video from surveillance cameras in Bucha and vetted audio recordings of phone calls by Russian soldiers.

Read the whole thing. It’s shocking and horrifying. (And that shrieking harpy Green is an embarrassment to the human species.)

Here’s the link to the video which is very hard to watch. It’s not available for embedding here.

A DeSantis cult?

They’re trying …

I dunno. Does he have that cult leader magic? He’s a tremendous asshole, to be sure. Is that enough?

Live with uncertainty

It isn’t easy, but for the next few days we have no choice. This election is down to the wire.

If you had told me a year ago that polls would be showing Democrats and Republicans within the margin of error a few days before this midterm election, I would have said you were nuts. After a couple of off-year wins for Republicans that had the Beltway press corps giddy with excitement, conventional wisdom held that a “red wave” was building, and likely to become a “red tsunami.” Even sober-minded analysts saw the political environment offering at least a comfortable win for Republicans in 2022.

All the fundamentals pointed toward a rout for the Democrats. The president was tremendously unpopular, gas prices were soaring and the relentless coverage of various failed Senate votes, thanks to a couple of Democratic Senate divas, had the administration’s policy agenda circling the drain. Some prognosticators said the Republicans were on track to gain 35 seats or more in the House and very likely a solid majority in the Senate.

Then the Supreme Court dropped a stink bomb in the middle of the party, overturning Roe v. Wade and electrifying the sullen Democrats. Over the course of the summer the polls tightened and it looked as though the red wave might not materialize after all. Maybe the Democrats could defy all predictions and somehow hold onto their majority.

That’s occurred on rare occasions in midterm elections over the past half-century or more, most recently in 2002 when the GOP won a slim majority even though a Republican president, George W. Bush, held the White House. Of course that election came shortly after the cataclysmic 9/11 terrorist attack, with the country in the grip of war fever and Bush’s approval rating at its highest point. But for the most part, it’s undeniably true that the party out of power wins midterm elections. It’s just a matter of degree.

Facing an unpopular president plagued with investigations, Newt Gingrich predicted a gain of 30 to 40 seats in the 1998 midterms. Instead, they were his downfall. Could history repeat itself?

But the out-party can also sometimes overplay its hand. Consider the salient example of 1998, for instance. The Republicans decided to impeach Bill Clinton for lying under oath about a sexual affair and they thought it was a slam dunk they’d roll up huge wins in the midterm elections, which came right in the middle of the big, salacious House investigation. Speaker Newt Gingrich was so confident about gaining a huge number of seats that he released special prosecutor Ken Starr’s bodice-ripping report on the internet, which even its drafters thought was a mistake. He predicted a gain of 30 to 40 seats, believing that the report would depress Democrats and galvanize the Christian right. It didn’t turn out that way at all, and Democrats gained five seats instead. 

Filmmaker Michael Pack was following Gingrich at the time and caught the denouement for what became his documentary “The Fall of Newt Gingrich.” An AP report on the film’s release in 2000 described the key events this way:

Even that night, Gingrich’s senior political director, Joe Gaylord, expresses confidence — which ultimately will be exposed as overconfidence — that “we would gain seats, it was only a matter of how many we gain.” As the night progresses, smiles disappear from Gingrich’s “war room,” and multiple shots capture the speaker, mouth widened in disbelief. Later, he tells Pack he was “genuinely confused.”

    It’s true that Republicans kept control of the House but Gingrich’s career was over and he was forced to resign shortly thereafter. Hubris had cost them dearly.

    The question in 2022 is whether they’re doing it again. In several major races, Republicans are clearly suffering because they’ve nominated a group of batshit-crazy Trumpers and are trying to turn back the clock to the 1600s on women’s rights. That might not have have the frisson of the Starr Report but it’s a potent motivation for Democrats — and also seems to be a potent motivation for Republicans.

    Polls show that the generic ballot (that is, whether people favor Democrats or Republicans overall) within the margin of error, while pollsters and strategists proclaim that Republican votes are being undercounted again, as they were in 2016 and 2020 (for reasons that remain unclear). But as FiveThirtyEight noted this week, you can’t predict the direction of polling errors in advance:

      Historically, polls have been equally likely to underestimate Republicans or Democrats. So it’s also possible that pollsters have fixed the problems that plagued them in 2016 and 2020 — maybe even overcorrected for them — and that the current polls are too good for the GOP. In other words, a wide range of scenarios is possible in this election: everything from a Republican landslide to a world where Democrats hold the House and gain seats in the Senate.

      This doesn’t feel like a normal midterm election and there’s plenty of evidence that it isn’t. Early voting so far shows a massive turnout so far. Traditionally, that’s an advantage for Democrats ,and Republican officials and candidates have been following Donald Trump’s lead and telling their voters to wait until Election Day to vote. We have no way of knowing whether this big early vote means that many GOP voters defying those instructions or whether Election Day will witness long lines of angry white Republicans. We’ll simply have to wait and see.

      Unfortunately, the mainstream media has decided to frame the horse race as if Republicans already have it in the bag. They take the supposed under-polling of Republicans as written in stone and view races that are too close to call as a sign that the entire election is the GOP’s to lose. And who knows — there’s a decent chance they’re right. But there’s also a pretty fair chance they are wrong and their slanted coverage is setting up a monumental right-wing freakout if Democrats happen to pull off a win (or at least do better than expected).

      We already know that Republicans are planning to contest any races they lose and are telling their voters that the only way Democrats can win is if they cheat. This is now an article of faith on the right. Current coverage has any number of GOP candidates measuring the drapes for their new offices, and it’s pretty clear they won’t accept defeat graciously. Even if Republicans lose, they win. The way it works now, elections is never over.

      Honestly, the media should have learned its lessons, and should be much more careful about relying on wonky polling in a close race. After all, it was just six years ago that the “media elite” felt so sure that Hillary Clinton had the election wrapped up that they put her on notice that they were going to pursue her relentlessly before the election even happened. We all know how that turned out.

      It’s uncomfortable and frightening to think about what will happen if the Republicans win. But as I said, if anyone had claimed we’d be in this position a year ago I would have said they were crazy. By all relevant historical standards, Democrats were supposed to be buried right now, and they’re not. For the next few days we’ll all have to do something we just hate to do: Live in uncertainty.