Skip to content

Month: February 2023

The slow blade penetrates the shield

What are those things flying our friendly skies?

Of course, Republicans want to shoot first and ask questions later. You know, like the Air Force general in Iron Man.

U.S. fighters shot down another flying object over Lake Huron on Sunday at President Biden’s instructions (New York Times):

An object first appeared over Montana on Saturday and then disappeared, leading officials to conclude that it was an anomaly. But the object reappeared on Sunday over Montana, then over Wisconsin and Michigan. The object, which was flying at 20,000 feet and posed a potential threat to civil aviation, had an octagonal structure with strings hanging off but had no discernible payload, U.S. officials said.

An F-16 shot down the object over Lake Huron.

National security officials on Sunday discounted the possibility that the objects shot down over the weekend might have extraterrestrial origins. However, Gen. Glen D. VanHerck, the commander of the Air Force’s Northern Command, said during a news conference, “I haven’t ruled out anything at this point.”

“I would prefer them to be trigger-happy than to be permissive,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union. “But we’re going to have to see whether or not this is just the administration trying to change headlines,”

Uh-huh.

Deputy Pentagon press secretary Sabrina Singh mentioned difference between the three objects shot down over the weekend. They’ve been reluctant to characterize them as balloons:

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, meanwhile, said Congress needs to investigate why it took so long for the US to catch on to the Chinese government’s use of spy balloons.

“I do think (Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of Montana) is looking into why it took so long for us, our military, our intelligence, to know about these balloons. That’s something I support. Congress should look at that. That’s the question we have to answer,” he said. “I think our military, our intelligence are doing a great job, present and future. I feel a lot of confidence in what they’re doing. But why, as far back as the Trump administration, did no one know about this?”

Perhaps because, as Frank Herbert suggested in “Dune,” “the slow blade penetrates the shield.” Mabe the radars have trouble with smaller, slower-moving objects.

Because they enjoy a fake sport?

Why Republicans dress like supervillains

Our theater department staged a modernized version of The Drunkard when I was an undergrad. The temperance play has been around since the mid-19th century. We brought in a specialist from New York to choreograph every over-the-top gesture. Every movement of every character. Each had an entrance theme played on a tinny piano off-stage. The audience is invited to cheer the heroes and boo the villain. We sold bags of peanuts to either eat or throw at the bad guy. The whole point of the melodrama these days is high camp.

Amanda Marcotte argues this morning (my take) that what we may be missing is that the right is staging a version of the show every single day. “Why do so many Republicans now dress like cartoon supervillains?” Salon’s headline asks.

When Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) arrived for the State of the Union Address garbed in a white fur coat and wore it through the speech, she got “compared to a Stephen King monster, a gangster’s wife in a mob movie, and, of course, a campy Disney villain:”

But for the “wealthy heiress who spent her pre-political life as a woman of leisure,” drawing that kind of attention and ridicule is the point, Marcotte argues. It got Greene attention. It got her photo plastered across print and electronic coverage:

Drawing scorn from people like [Seth] Meyers, which she can then repackage as “proof” that she’s a victim of the “coastal elite,” defined not by money, which she has plenty of, but the fact that they know the difference between the Nazi police and cold tomato soup. Above all else, she wanted to look the part of the villain. Far from being people who are unaware they’re the baddies, the MAGA movement is about glorying in their own self-image as political scoundrels. 

In The Drunkard, there are heroes, but the audience favorite is the cackling, Snidely Whiplash-style villain. It’s what many on the right aspire to, Marcotte believes.

Greene is far from the only one. Despite their hatred of actual drag queens, the modern GOP has a robust interest in using costumes to create fantasy versions of themselves — and almost always, that fantasy is of someone who is a proud scalawag. The current trend of Republicans dressing like Batman villains can be traced back to dirty trickster and shameless Nixon fan Roger Stone. For instance, he dressed like the antagonist of a Charles Dickens novel for Donald Trump’s inauguration. 

Charlotte Richardson, my high school journalism instructor, observed that journalism takes many forms, including “True Detective” and supermarket tabloids. It may be lousy journalism, she said, but at least they’re reading. One might say the same of professional wrestling. It’s not Shakespeare, but at least it’s theater. That’s the sort the Greenes and the Stones are staging for the MAGA crowd. They are heel wrestlers, the colorful villains of professional wrestling.

Then there are the Bond villains like Rupert Murdoch and Elon Musk.

Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) has adopted the pose of the “malevolent prep school student in an 80s movie.” Are his glasses even prescription?

After successfully evading an FBI investigation for sex trafficking of minors, Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida’s hair only seemed to grow taller, turning him into a dead ringer for Cesar Romero’s version of The Joker. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, whose fabricated background is drawing Santos comparisons, favors dramatic makeup paired with shiny menswear that looks very much like a cheap knockoff of Annie Lennox’s dominatrix stylings in the “Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This)” video. 

False humility is out. It doesn’t draw eyeballs and sell tickets any more than a wrestler who fights “fair,” whatever that is. The point is that MAGA is about the GOP base working out its “darkest desires.”

It’s about dispensing entirely with pretensions of morality and giving themselves permission to be proud villains. Trump, of course, started things by bragging about how good he is at getting away with crime, from sexual assault to tax fraud. He was backed by an online army of trolls with Pepe-the-frog avatars, who relished their newfound freedom to use politics as cover to harass and abuse people. 

Kyle Rittenhouse and Alex Jones are MAGA heroes.

Marcotte writes, “To a certain degree, I get it. Playing the part of the villain can be thrilling. I’ve long been a fan of goth and punk fashion, both of which get their glamour through transgression.” Clint Eastwood’s Harry Callahan made the anti-hero cool. Alan Rickman’s Hans Gruber was cooler still. But Savile Row is not what MAGA pols are shooting for.

The problem with Republicans, of course, is they aren’t actually playing. Their goals are straight evil, from forced childbirth to turning away political refugees to slashing the retirement benefits of seniors to decimating health care. What’s shifted in the past few years is a willingness of GOP leaders to wink knowingly about the immorality of their own views. Sure, there’s still plenty of effort put into pretending that they want to do heinous things for good reasons. So we still have to sit through disingenuous conservatives feigning “pro-life” reasons for abortion bans, for instance. But, led by shameless criminals like Trump, there’s just a lot more trollish approach on the right, one that treats evil like it’s just an impish good time. Once “triggering the liberals” became the main political goal, gleeful wickedness became inevitable. Of course, many of them want the costuming to match their self-congratulatory attitude about being the worst. 

Attending professional wrestling is fun once or twice. (Once, decades ago, was enough for me.) The political heels have made it a lifestyle to sell to their base. They’ve made a mockery of democracy while sneering at the audience.

Banning Yoko

It’s true.

Here’s what the book is about:

The charming, acclaimed book about a cat who is teased for the food she brings for school lunch—and that launched the beloved series about Yoko—is about accepting and embracing our differences.

Mmm, Yoko’s mom has packed her favorite for lunch today—sushi! But her classmates don’t think it looks quite so yummy. “Ick!” says one of the Franks. “It’s seaweed!” They’re not even impressed by her red bean ice cream dessert. Of course, Mrs. Jenkins has a plan that might solve Yoko’s problem. But will it work with the other children in class?

=

I suppose it is too much to ask that these people actually try to teach their kids to be polite, decent citizens, tolerant of differences with other people.  After all, they are cretinous morons themselves and only want their kids to grow up to be just like them. But what the hell? 

I think maybe we need to start looking at what books they want the schools to teach. A child’s guide to Mein Kampf? The Jim Crow Reader? What children’s’ books do they actually think are appropriate if this is too “woke” for them.

Crooked AGs throughout the GOP

Ken Paxton, Texas AG, just settled a defamation suit brought by his former deputies and Texas taxpayers will foot the bill. And why did he defame his former deputies? Because they blew the whistle on Paxton’s criminal conduct, a case which is still in limbo.

Attorney General Ken Paxton and four of his former top deputies who said he improperly fired them after they accused him of crimes have reached a tentative agreement to end a whistleblower lawsuit that would pay those employees $3.3 million.

In a filing Friday, attorneys for Paxton and the whistleblowers asked the Texas Supreme Court to further defer consideration of the whistleblower case until the two sides can finalize the tentative agreement. Once the deal is finalized and payment by the attorney general’s office is approved, the two sides will move to end the case, the filing said.

The agreement would bring an end to the lawsuit over the firing of the staffers, but would not end Paxton’s legal troubles. The allegations by the former aides of bribery and abuse of office prompted an FBI investigation, though no charges have been filed and Paxton has denied wrongdoing. Separately, Paxton remains under felony indictment on state charges of securities fraud.

In a joint statement, attorneys for three of the whistleblowers — Blake Brickman, David Maxwell and Ryan Vassar — said, “Our clients are honorable men who have spent more than two years fighting for what is right. We believe the terms of the settlement speak for themselves.”

Don Tittle, a lawyer for the other whistleblower, Mark Penley, said in a statement that the case was really important for “how government should function and what we expect out of our public officials.”

“We think this settlement goes a long way toward restoring the good reputations of the men who brought this suit against the attorney general’s office. They should never have been fired in the first place. [T]his settlement confirms that in a big way,” Tittle said.

Paxton, a Republican who won a third four-year term in November, said in a statement that he agreed to the settlement to save taxpayer money and start his new term unencumbered by the accusations.

“After over two years of litigating with four ex-staffers who accused me in October 2020 of ‘potential’ wrongdoing, I have reached a settlement agreement to put this issue to rest,” Paxton said. “I have chosen this path to save taxpayer dollars and ensure my third term as Attorney General is unburdened by unnecessary distractions. This settlement achieves these goals. I look forward to serving the People of Texas for the next four years free from this unfortunate sideshow.”

The tentative agreement would pay $3.3 million to the four whistleblowers and keep in place an appeals court ruling that allowed the case to move forward. Paxton had asked the Supreme Court to void that ruling.

The settlement, once finalized, also will include a statement from Paxton saying he “accepts that plaintiffs acted in a manner that they thought was right and apologizes for referring to them as ‘rogue employees.’” The attorney general’s office also agreed to delete a news release from its website that called the whistleblowers “rogue employees.”

The final agreement will include a statement saying neither side admits fault or accepts liability in the case, Friday’s filing said.

The settlement will be structured to pay Vassar for 27 months of back pay for work he would have done had he not been fired. That will allow Vassar, former deputy attorney general for legal counsel, to claim 27 months of service credit toward his state pension fund.

The attorney general’s office also agreed to stop opposing Maxwell’s bid to change paperwork filed with the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement about his removal as director of the attorney general’s Law Enforcement Division. Such paperwork is important in law enforcement work, and a firing could be a red flag to future employers.

The settlement, which was mediated by attorney Patrick Keel of Austin, is contingent on the approval of funding.

The other whistleblower in the suit, Penley, is a former deputy attorney general for criminal justice.

The payment for the settlement would come out of state funds and has to be approved by the Legislature. After the tentative agreement was made public, state Rep. Jeff Leach, the Republican from Plano who oversees the House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee, said he was “troubled that hardworking taxpayers might be on the hook for this settlement between the Attorney General and former employees of his office.”

“I’ve spoken with the Attorney General directly this morning and communicated in no uncertain terms that, on behalf of our constituents, legislators will have questions and legislators will expect answers,” Leach said in a statement to The Texas Tribune.

The whistleblower lawsuit was filed after eight former top deputies to Paxton accused him of bribery and abuse of office in October 2020 and reported Paxton’s alleged actions to authorities. All eight of those employees either were fired or resigned.

In November 2020, four of those former employees filed a whistleblower lawsuit claiming Paxton had improperly retaliated against them after they accused him of criminal acts. They sought reinstatement and compensation for lost wages, as well as pay for future lost earnings and damages for emotional pain and suffering.

Filings in the whistleblower suit revealed more details about the crimes the former employees alleged Paxton committed, including doing political favors for real estate developer Nate Paul, a friend and political donor who gave Paxton $25,000 for his 2018 campaign. The allegations said Paul helped Paxton with a home remodel and by hiring Paxton’s alleged girlfriend. Paxton is married to state Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney.

The whistleblowers claimed Paxton pushed to have the attorney general’s office get involved in Paul’s legal disputes, even when lawyers in the office advised against it. Paxton pushed to get involved in a real estate deal involving one of Paul’s companies and an Austin charity, and appointed a special counsel to look into claims Paul made that state and federal law enforcement had improperly raided his home in 2019. Lawyers in the attorney general’s office had found “no credible evidence” that Paul’s rights were violated, but the special counsel was appointed over their objections.

The whistleblowers said the special counsel, Brandon Cammack, then obtained more than three dozen subpoenas targeting people they believed to be Paul’s enemies.

Two weeks ago, three of the four plaintiffs in the whistleblower lawsuit — Penley, Maxwell and Vassar — asked the Texas Supreme Court to put their case on hold while they negotiated a settlement with Paxton. Brickman initially opposed the motion but signed on to the settlement agreement filed with the court Friday.

Brickman did not participate in the mediation but agreed to sign on to the settlement after the inclusion of some “significant non-monetary terms,” his lawyer Tom Nesbitt said.

“We are pleased with this outcome,” Nesbitt said.

Paxton has argued in state court that he is exempt from the Texas Whistleblower Act — written to protect government employees from on-the-job retaliation by other employees after reporting misconduct — claiming that he is an elected official, not a public employee. He also said he fired the employees not in retaliation for their complaint but because of personnel disagreements. An appeals court has ruled against him and allowed the case to move forward. Last January, Paxton appealed his case to the Texas Supreme Court.

The whistleblower suit isn’t Paxton’s only legal problem.

Paxton is still facing felony securities fraud charges tied to private business deals in 2011. He has denied wrongdoing in the nearly 8-year-old case.

The Texas State Bar also sued Paxton last year for professional misconduct for allegedly misrepresenting that he had uncovered substantial evidence of fraud in a bid to overturn Democrat Joe Biden’s election victories in four battleground states. Paxton has denied wrongdoing and criticized the suit as politically motivated.

All of this was well known during last year’s election. He won it going away. Republicans love to vote for crooks. They prefer them.

Republican officials will decide which laws should be enforced

You hear a lot about how police officers have to be allowed to shoot first and ask questions later because it’s so dangerous for them on the streets. But many of them are against gun safety laws which seem counter-intuitive. Some are going so far as to refuse to enforce them:

Law enforcement’s reaction to the recent assault weapons law approved by Gov. JB Pritzker has been largely negative, with many sheriffs saying they believe the law is illegal.

More than 80 sheriffs, including those in Peoria, Woodford and Tazewell counties, have said they will not ask those with a valid Firearm Owners Identification card to register their weapons as required by the law. Others have gone further, saying they will not arrest people “solely for noncompliance with the act.”

But can a sheriff refuse to enforce a law? Is it legal for a sheriff to decide what laws are legal, or is that the purview of the courts? The Illinois Constitution establishes the office of the sheriff and states that, in addition to duties and powers provided by ordinance, they also have the “duties, powers or functions derived from common law or historical precedent unless altered by law or county ordinance.”

That doesn’t sound like discretion to me but what do I know? These sheriffs aren’t the only ones who refuse to enforce gun laws.

Meanwhile,, the right is challenging the long established norm of prosecutorial discretion – at least when it comes to criminalizing abortion:

GOP lawmakers see a major flaw in their states’ near-total abortion bans: Some local prosecutors won’t enforce them.

Republicans in Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina and Texas — frustrated by progressive district attorneys who have publicly pledged not to bring charges under their state’s abortion laws — have introduced bills that would allow state officials to either bypass the local prosecutors or kick them out of office if their abortion-related enforcement is deemed too lenient.

In Texas, one of several bills lawmakers are pushing would allow the state attorney general or a private individual to ask a court to remove a district attorney who fails to prosecute abortion-related offenses and other “crimes of violence.” They also plan to introduce a bill to allow any resident to bring civil claims against anyone suspected of “aiding and abetting” an abortion.

In Georgia, legislators want to create a prosecutorial oversight commission that could discipline or remove local prosecutors who demonstrate a “willful and persistent failure to perform his or her duties.”

A bill introduced in the South Carolina House would give the state attorney general the power to prosecute abortion cases — something currently under the purview of local district attorneys.

And in Indiana, proposed legislation would allow a legislatively appointed special prosecutor to enforce laws when a local prosecutor declines to do so.

The mounting tension between Republican lawmakers and local prosecutors over abortion is one part of a broader fight over diverging approaches to criminal justice — seen in recent battles over drug laws, property crimes and other offenses. As more prosecutors, particularly in progressive metropolises in red states, win elections by breaking with the decadeslong tough-on-crime mindset and running as a check on GOP lawmakers, conservative state officials say they now need to rein in their excesses.

“Whatever issue we’re talking about — whether it’s marijuana, abortion, enforcing homicide statutes, enforcing whatever the law is — the law is on the books, and the law is supposed to be applied equally across the board among our citizens,” said Republican Indiana Sen. Aaron Freeman, who is sponsoring the special prosecutor bill. “If we’re just going to basically ignore the Constitution and our republic and just do whatever the hell we want, well, that’s a society that scares the hell out of me.”

GOP officials are also exploring nonlegislative tactics. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended Hillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warren, a Democrat, over his public pledge not to bring charges under the state’s 15-week abortion ban. Warren sued in federal court to be reinstated, and while the judge agreed that DeSantis’ action violated the state’s constitution, he ruled that only a state court could reverse the governor’s decision.

The moves have left local prosecutors chafing at what they see as encroachment on their executive branch powers, tactics that Warren called “ridiculous” and “undemocratic.”

“It’s a political war being waged against people for speaking their minds,” he said.

Nonpartisan legal groups view this trend as a threat to prosecutors’ ability to use their best judgment on which cases are worth pursuing and how to allocate their offices’ finite resources to best serve the community that elected them.

So police officers have discretion but prosecutors don’t, depending on which laws the Republicans want them to enforce? Good to know.

Old people are going to die soon anyway, amirite?

What’s a little more suffering?

This is depressing. But it’s best that people over 60 understand that it’s every man for himself, accept the fact that their lives are considered expendable and assess the risks accordingly:

In early December, Aldo Caretti developed a cough and, despite all his precautions, came up positive for Covid on a home test. It took his family a couple of days to persuade Mr. Caretti, never fond of doctors, to go to the emergency room. There, he was sent directly to the intensive care unit.

Mr. Caretti and his wife, Consiglia, both 85, lived quietly in a condo in Plano, Texas. “He liked to read and learn, in English and Italian,” said his son Vic Caretti, 49. “He absolutely adored his three grandchildren.”

Aldo Caretti had encountered some health setbacks last year, including a mild stroke and a serious bout of shingles, but “he recuperated from all that.”

Covid was different. Even on a ventilator, Mr. Caretti struggled to breathe. After 10 days, “he wasn’t getting better,” said Vic Caretti, who flew in from Salt Lake City. “His organs were starting to break down. They said, ‘He’s not going to make it.’”

At least, this late in the pandemic, families can be with their loved ones at the end of life. When the family agreed to remove Mr. Caretti from the ventilator and provide comfort care, “he was alert, very aware of what was happening,” his son said. “He was holding everyone’s hand.” He died a few hours later, on Dec. 14.

For older Americans, the pandemic still poses significant dangers. About three-quarters of Covid deaths have occurred in people over 65, with the greatest losses concentrated among those over 75.

In January, the number of Covid-related deaths fell after a holiday spike but nevertheless numbered about 2,100 among those ages 65 to 74, more than 3,500 among 75- to 84-year-olds and nearly 5,000 among those over 85. Those three groups accounted for about 90 percent of the nation’s Covid deaths last month.

Hospital admissions, which have also been dropping, remain more than five times as high for people over 70 than as those in their 50s. Hospitals can endanger older patients even when the conditions that brought them in are successfully treated; the harmful effects of drugs, inactivity, sleep deprivation, delirium and other stresses can take months to recover from — or can land them back in the hospital.

“There continue to be very high costs of Covid,” said Julia Raifman, a public health policy specialist at the Boston University School of Public Health and a co-author of a recent editorial in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The demographic divide reflects a debate that continues as the pandemic wears on: What responsibility do those at lower risk from the virus have to those at higher risk — not only older people, but those who are immunosuppressed or who have chronic conditions?

Should individuals, institutions, businesses and governments maintain strategies, like masking, that help protect everyone but particularly benefit the more vulnerable?

“Do we distribute them among the whole population?” Dr. Raifman asked of those measures. “Or do we forgo that, and let the chips fall where they may?”

Nancy Berlinger, a bioethicist and research scholar at the Hastings Center, made a similar point: “The foundational questions about ethics are about what we owe others, not just ourselves, not just our circle of family and friends.”

Three years in, the societal answer seems clear: With mask and vaccination mandates mostly ended, testing centers and vaccination clinics closed and the federal public health emergency scheduled to expire in May, older adults are on their own.

“Americans do not agree about the duty to protect others, whether it’s from a virus or gun violence,” Dr. Berlinger said.

Only 40.8 percent of seniors have received a bivalent booster. Some who have not believe they have strong protection against infection, a C.D.C. survey reported last month (though the data indicated otherwise).

Others worry about side effects or feel unsure of the booster’s effectiveness. Seniors may also find it difficult to locate vaccination sites, make appointments (especially online) and travel to the sites.

In nursing homes, where the early pandemic proved so devastating, only 52 percent of residents and 23 percent of staff members were up-to-date on vaccinations last month. Early on, a successful, federally funded campaign sent health care workers into nursing homes to administer the original vaccine doses. Medicare also mandated staff vaccinations.

But for boosters, nursing homes were permitted to develop their own policies — or not.

“It makes absolutely no sense,” said David Grabowski, a health policy professor at Harvard Medical School. “This is the group that should have the highest vaccination rate in the country. Everyone there is very susceptible.”

The Covid costs for older people extend beyond the most extreme dangers and include limited activities, diminished lives and continuing isolation and its associated risks.

In Hillsboro, Ore., Billie Erwin, 75, feels particularly vulnerable because she has Type 1 diabetes. She and her husband have foregone concerts and theater performances, indoor restaurant meals with friends, moviegoing and volunteering. Her book group fell apart.

“We used to spend a lot of time on the Oregon coast,” Ms. Erwin said. But because the trip involves an overnight stay, they’ve gone just twice in three years; annual visits to the Oregon Shakespeare Festival ended for the same reason.

The ongoing constraints have exacerbated the depression Ms. Erwin also contends with; some days, she doesn’t bother getting dressed.

“I’m disappointed we don’t consider other people as much as we ought to,” she said. “I don’t know that most people even think about it.”

Eleanor Bravo, 73, who lives in Corrales, N.M., lost her sister to Covid early in the pandemic; two years passed before the family could gather for a memorial. “I had this inordinate fear that if I got Covid, I would die too,” Ms. Bravo said.

She did develop Covid in July, and recovered. But she and her partner still avoid most cultural events, travel and restaurants. “Our world has gotten much smaller,” she said. An organizer with Marked by Covid, a national nonprofit organization, she is working to build a memorial to the 9,000 New Mexicans who have died of the virus.

Of course, many older Americans, too, have resumed their prepandemic routines. In Charlotte, N.C., Donna and David Bolls, both 67, fell ill with Covid in May — “the sickest I’ve been that I can remember,” Ms. Bolls said.

But afterward, they returned to restaurants, concerts, shopping, her part-time retail job and his church choir, without masks. “It’s a risk I’m willing to take,” she said. “I feel like I’m living life on my terms, doing the things I want to do.”

Though the political viability of mandates for masks, vaccination or improved indoor air quality appears nil, policymakers and organizations could still take measures to protect older (and immunocompromised) people without forcing them to become hermits.

Health care systems, pharmacies and government agencies could start renewed vaccination campaigns in communities and in nursing homes, including mobile clinics and home visits.

Remember the “senior hours” some supermarkets instituted early in the pandemic, allowing older customers to shop with smaller crowds and less exposure? Now, “public spaces are not accessible to people concerned about infections,” Dr. Raifman said.

They could be. Markets, libraries and museums could adopt some masks-required hours. Many Off Broadway theaters already designate two or three masked performances each week; others could follow suit. Steven Thrasher, author of “The Viral Underclass,” organized a masked book tour last fall with stops in 20 cities.

“Between the extremes of closing everything to mitigate transmission and doing nothing, there’s a middle ground,” Dr. Raifman said. “We can mitigate transmissions in smart and inclusive ways.”

Yet Vic Caretti, who has found a grief support group helpful, encounters comments from strangers in Salt Lake City because he wears a mask in public.

“I don’t think people understand how Covid affects older Americans,” Mr. Caretti said with frustration. “In 2020, there was this all-in-this-together vibe, and it’s been annihilated. People just need to care about other people, man. That’s my soapbox.”

I have a 65 year old friend who just got diagnosed and she feels like garbage right now. But her doctor inexplicably refused to prescribe Paxlovid because “the side effects outweigh the benefits.”

Take yer chances, I guess…

This is a minefield for older people. COVID isn’t going away and I guess we are all accepting the fact that we might get it multiple times a year depending on the variant and our lifestyles. Vaccines are great and are saving lives, thank God. But for older people the specter of getting laid out for weeks with this thing, contracting Long Covid and possibly having it all go sideways and winding up in the hospital remains a serious concern. Many are still working (because they have to…) And apparently nobody gives a damn.

Update — Good lord

Matt Gaetz does it again

He never stops being embarrassing:

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) kicked off the first meeting of the House Judiciary Committee last week by cordially inviting an accused murderer to lead the Pledge of Allegiance.

Under its new Republican leadership, the 118th Congress’ judiciary committee may choose to start each hearing with the pledge ― an amendment to the rules put forth by Gaetz, who said it allowed members to invite “inspirational constituents” to lead it.

The first honor went to Corey Beekman, a retired National Guard member accused of killing a man in 2019 whose case has not gone to trial.

Gaetz did not mention this aspect of his guest’s backstory. Beekman led the pledge in his military dress uniform on Feb. 1.

“It is my pleasure and distinct honor to introduce to the committee Staff Sgt. Corey Ryan Beekman, an American hero and a constituent of mine residing in Pensacola, Florida,” Gaetz said in the video still available on C-SPAN. He rolled through Beekman’s life story. Born in Holland, Michigan, Gaetz said Beekman enlisted in the Michigan Army National Guard while still in high school before serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, finally moving to Florida to be closer to family.

Beekman also allegedly shot and killed 32-year-old William Buchanan at a home in northern Michigan in April 2019, between his military service and his move down to Florida.

A 32-year-old woman, Katlin Buck, was injured in the attack, local news reported. However, UpNorthLive noted that Buck’s two children were left unharmed.

The pandemic disrupted the initially scheduled date for Beekman’s trial, and charges were subsequently dropped after Buck refused to testify against him, the Mason County Press reported.

Beekman was released in September 2020 from Mason County Jail, where he had been held since 2019, the outlet said.

Buchanan’s mother, Denita, told the Mason County Press that she believed her son went to Beekman’s house to help Buck move out, leading to the shooting and then a 90-minute standoff with police.

The Buchanan family told multiple news outlets that they were horrified to hear about Gaetz honoring Beekman.

“It was like getting a dagger stuck in our heart again,” Denita Buchanan told The Daily Beast.

The good news is that he sent the family an American flag and said he was sorry explaining that it never occurred to them to check into a veteran.

You’d think he’d know better…

Puncturing the GOP’s Chinese balloons

For conservative pundits reevaluating their life choices

Watching conservative pundits and consultants reevaluate their life choices in the time of Trump is heartening. It doesn’t mean that the Bill Kristols and Mona Charons and Rick Wilsons won’t rediscover their three-legged roots once MAGA fever inevitably passes, but for now, they provide refreshing clarity about their Late Great Republican Party.

Jennifer Rubin is enjoying seeing the cordyceps-infected in Congress taken down by Democrats. The GOP’s sideshow “hearings” that opened in the House last week are not going as planned. House committees may get C-SPAN coverage, but the forum is not as mine-free fro Republicans as Fox News.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), freshman Rep. Daniel S. Goldman (D-N.Y.) , and Rep. Jamie B. Raskin (D-Md.) are nobody’s props. They came to puncture MAGA Republicans’ Chinese balloons. And did, repeatedly.

Rubin writes:

Democrats came to these hearings prepared and focused. They not only eviscerated GOP conspiracy theories but also did a bang-up job exposing Republicans as the ones who have “weaponized” the government.

Perhaps this was inevitable. MAGA conspiracy theories only work in the hermetically sealed universe of right-wing media, where no assumptions are challenged, no hard questions are posed and no complete explanation of a supposed scandal is required. In that realm, a MAGA lawmaker can scream “Hunter Biden!” and be cheered for “owning the Libs.”

Once set loose into the real world, however, the MAGA conspiratorialists find it tough sledding. President Biden has no reason to be concerned about these congressional probes so long as Democrats such as Ocasio-Cortez, Goldman and Raskin are there to embarrass Republicans.

For going on the offense, defending the First Amendment and exposing the vapidness of the GOP’s inquiries, we can say well done, Reps. Goldman, Raskin and Ocasio-Cortez.

Thanks for noticing, Jennifer, that some of us on the left are smart, decent people, and not at all extremist. A belated “Welcome to the party, pal.”

A change is gonna come

If Democrats will let it

Anderson Clayton addresses Guilford County, NC Democrats. Photo via Anderson Clayton.

Whether Republican or Democrat, it is not often that state power players fail to get their way in North Carolina politics. On Saturday, however, high-level Democrats’ pick for state party chair lost reelection in an upset to a young, rural activist. Center-left Carolina Forward, a nonprofit progressive research group, dubbed the election “a massive rebuke of the party establishment.”

Anderson Clayton, 25, is chair in Person County (pop. 39,000) bordering Virginia north of Durham. N.C. Democrats’ State Executive Committee (SEC) chose Clayton over incumbent, Bobbie Richardson, 73, a former state House member and the party’s first Black chair elected in 2021. Richardson garnered endorsements from all seven Democratic members of the Congressional delegation, Attorney General Josh Stein, and Gov. Roy Cooper. Cooper delivered a prerecorded pitch for Richardson on the statewide Zoom call.

Young Democrats of America sense a generational shift.

Richardson brought endorsements. But Clayton brought game, too. The president of the state party chairs’ association was a field organizer in Iowa both for Kamala Harris (2019) and for Elizabeth Warren (2020) before becoming regional field director for Amy McGrath’s 2020 campaign for U.S. Senate in Eastern Kentucky. She works as a broadband analyst focused on bringing service to rural communities. Clayton has been profiled in The Daily Yonder and quoted as a Trump-country progressive organizer in (of all places) The Washington Times.

North Carolina politicians use “from Murphy to Manteo” to reference the largely rural state’s expanse, a nine-hour drive west to east. But few actually traverse it. In her campaign for chair, Clayton barnstormed the state from end to end. Small-county Democrats who’d not seen an official from the state party in years welcomed and embraced her.

The elections Saturday were a clash of insurgents vs. establishment, rural vs. urban, and a generational shift. Three other state party offices went to fresh faces on Saturday. A majority of SEC members felt change was overdue after N.C. Democrats’ losses in 2022, including the U.S. Senate race and General Assembly seats. Democrats’ candidate recruiting efforts that were robust in 2018 and 2020 fell apart in 2022 (with multiple factors outside Richardson’s control). They left 14 of 50 state Senate seats and 30 of 120 state House seats uncontested, likely harming turnout for the U.S. Senate and down-ticket races. Democrats lost control of the state Supreme Court to Republicans. The impact for election law will be severe and enduring.

On Saturday, those frustrations provoked a house cleaning.

“Our party wanted to have young leadership and look toward young leaders,” state Sen. Mike Woodard of Durham told the Raleigh News and Observer. “We wanted to find people who appealed to young Democrats. While they’re relatively young, they’ve all been engaged in party activity for quite some time.”

“We’re ready for someone exciting because that’s what it will take to win statewide elections and do better in places where we’ve lost ground,” Durham Democrat Carl Newman told the newspaper.

Clayton resembles that remark. Fast-talking, animated, and quick on her feet (video), Clayton does not present as someone raised in a small southern town. When she attended a taping of “The Price Is Right” last summer, it was inevitable that Anderson Clayton would “come on down.”

The Associated Press reported:

In a statement, Clayton thanked Democrats from across the state “for trusting me to lead our party as we prepare for the 2023 and 2024 elections.”

“I ran for Chair because I believe that we can build a brighter future for NCDP from the ground up, and I can’t wait to get to work,” Clayton said.

Clayton campaigned on the need for change in the party. That’s after Democrats lost seats in the General Assembly. They also lost control of the North Carolina Supreme Court.

Clayton also contended that the state party wasn’t doing enough to turn out its base and help candidates in rural areas.

Howard Dean initiated his 50-state plan because you can’t win if you don’t show up to play. Clayton is tired of Democrats feeling left behind in rural areas the party forfeits to the GOP.

For a party that imagines itself innovative, Democrats make too little room for young talent. They won’t stay if there’s nowhere up the ladder for them to go. State capitol insiders prefer the feels they get from former state politicians more at ease with the system of access-donors and old-boy consultants.

Plus, Democrats chronically pay too little attention to transition planning. Top national leadership remains a gerontocracy that does not seem to know its time is up. Baby boomers have had their turn at the tiller. They’ve made their mistakes and plenty of them. It’s time to step aside so younger generations can make theirs. It’s how a political party remains vital instead of sclerotic.

North Carolina’s grassroots are tired of losing and ready to follow Clayton. But will the top dogs?

Nationally even, Democrats are like the old joke about psychologists and light bulbs. First, the lightbulb has to want to change.